Macrolide Resistance and In Vitro Potentiation by Peptidomimetics in Porcine Clinical Escherichia coli
ABSTRACT Escherichia coli is intrinsically resistant to macrolides due to outer membrane impermeability, but may also acquire macrolide resistance genes by horizontal transfer. We evaluated the prevalence and types of acquired macrolide resistance determinants in pig clinical E. coli, and we assesse...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Yibing Ma [verfasserIn] Mattia Pirolo [verfasserIn] Prabha Subramani [verfasserIn] Ronette Gehring [verfasserIn] Peter Damborg [verfasserIn] Henrik Franzyk [verfasserIn] Luca Guardabassi [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: mSphere - American Society for Microbiology, 2016, 7(2022), 5 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:7 ; year:2022 ; number:5 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1128/msphere.00402-22 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ027438120 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ027438120 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230307113950.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1128/msphere.00402-22 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ027438120 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJbab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a QR1-502 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Yibing Ma |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Macrolide Resistance and In Vitro Potentiation by Peptidomimetics in Porcine Clinical Escherichia coli |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a ABSTRACT Escherichia coli is intrinsically resistant to macrolides due to outer membrane impermeability, but may also acquire macrolide resistance genes by horizontal transfer. We evaluated the prevalence and types of acquired macrolide resistance determinants in pig clinical E. coli, and we assessed the ability of peptidomimetics to potentiate different macrolide subclasses against strains resistant to neomycin, a first-line antibiotic in the treatment of pig-enteric infections. The erythromycin MIC distribution was determined in 324 pig clinical E. coli isolates, and 62 neomycin-resistant isolates were further characterized by genome sequencing and MIC testing of azithromycin, spiramycin, tilmicosin, and tylosin. The impact on potency achieved by combining these macrolides with three selected peptidomimetic compounds was determined by checkerboard assays in six strains representing different genetic lineages and macrolide resistance gene profiles. Erythromycin MICs ranged from 16 to <1,024 μg/mL. Azithromycin showed the highest potency in wild-type strains (1 to 8 μg/mL), followed by erythromycin (16 to 128 μg/mL), tilmicosin (32 to 256 μg/mL), and spiramycin (128 to 256 μg/mL). Isolates with elevated MIC mainly carried erm(B), either alone or in combination with other acquired macrolide resistance genes, including erm(42), mef(C), mph(A), mph(B), and mph(G). All peptidomimetic-macrolide combinations exhibited synergy (fractional inhibitory concentration index [FICI] < 0.5) with a 4- to 32-fold decrease in the MICs of macrolides. Interestingly, the MICs of tilmicosin in wild-type strains were reduced to concentrations (4 to 16 μg/mL) that can be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration, indicating that peptidomimetics can potentially be employed for repurposing tilmicosin in the management of E. coli enteritis in pigs. IMPORTANCE Acquired macrolide resistance is poorly studied in Escherichia coli because of intrinsic resistance and limited antimicrobial activity in Gram-negative bacteria. This study reveals new information on the prevalence and distribution of macrolide resistance determinants in a comprehensive collection of porcine clinical E. coli from Denmark. Our results contribute to understanding the correlation between genotypic and phenotypic macrolide resistance in E. coli. From a clinical standpoint, our study provides an initial proof of concept that peptidomimetics can resensitize E. coli to macrolide concentrations that may be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration. The latter result has implications for animal health and potential applications in veterinary antimicrobial drug development in view of the high rates of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli isolated from enteric infections in pigs and the lack of viable alternatives for treating these infections. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a macrolide resistance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a E. coli | |
| 650 | 4 | |a pigs | |
| 650 | 4 | |a enteritis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a peptidomimetics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a antibiotic potentiation | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Microbiology | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Mattia Pirolo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Prabha Subramani |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Ronette Gehring |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Peter Damborg |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Henrik Franzyk |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Luca Guardabassi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t mSphere |d American Society for Microbiology, 2016 |g 7(2022), 5 |w (DE-627)845748807 |w (DE-600)2844248-9 |x 23795042 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:2022 |g number:5 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00402-22 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/bab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/msphere.00402-22 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2379-5042 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 7 |j 2022 |e 5 | ||
| author_variant |
y m ym m p mp p s ps r g rg p d pd h f hf l g lg |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:23795042:2022----::arldrssacadnirptnitobppioieisnocn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
QR |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1128/msphere.00402-22 doi (DE-627)DOAJ027438120 (DE-599)DOAJbab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QR1-502 Yibing Ma verfasserin aut Macrolide Resistance and In Vitro Potentiation by Peptidomimetics in Porcine Clinical Escherichia coli 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ABSTRACT Escherichia coli is intrinsically resistant to macrolides due to outer membrane impermeability, but may also acquire macrolide resistance genes by horizontal transfer. We evaluated the prevalence and types of acquired macrolide resistance determinants in pig clinical E. coli, and we assessed the ability of peptidomimetics to potentiate different macrolide subclasses against strains resistant to neomycin, a first-line antibiotic in the treatment of pig-enteric infections. The erythromycin MIC distribution was determined in 324 pig clinical E. coli isolates, and 62 neomycin-resistant isolates were further characterized by genome sequencing and MIC testing of azithromycin, spiramycin, tilmicosin, and tylosin. The impact on potency achieved by combining these macrolides with three selected peptidomimetic compounds was determined by checkerboard assays in six strains representing different genetic lineages and macrolide resistance gene profiles. Erythromycin MICs ranged from 16 to <1,024 μg/mL. Azithromycin showed the highest potency in wild-type strains (1 to 8 μg/mL), followed by erythromycin (16 to 128 μg/mL), tilmicosin (32 to 256 μg/mL), and spiramycin (128 to 256 μg/mL). Isolates with elevated MIC mainly carried erm(B), either alone or in combination with other acquired macrolide resistance genes, including erm(42), mef(C), mph(A), mph(B), and mph(G). All peptidomimetic-macrolide combinations exhibited synergy (fractional inhibitory concentration index [FICI] < 0.5) with a 4- to 32-fold decrease in the MICs of macrolides. Interestingly, the MICs of tilmicosin in wild-type strains were reduced to concentrations (4 to 16 μg/mL) that can be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration, indicating that peptidomimetics can potentially be employed for repurposing tilmicosin in the management of E. coli enteritis in pigs. IMPORTANCE Acquired macrolide resistance is poorly studied in Escherichia coli because of intrinsic resistance and limited antimicrobial activity in Gram-negative bacteria. This study reveals new information on the prevalence and distribution of macrolide resistance determinants in a comprehensive collection of porcine clinical E. coli from Denmark. Our results contribute to understanding the correlation between genotypic and phenotypic macrolide resistance in E. coli. From a clinical standpoint, our study provides an initial proof of concept that peptidomimetics can resensitize E. coli to macrolide concentrations that may be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration. The latter result has implications for animal health and potential applications in veterinary antimicrobial drug development in view of the high rates of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli isolated from enteric infections in pigs and the lack of viable alternatives for treating these infections. macrolide resistance E. coli pigs enteritis peptidomimetics antibiotic potentiation Microbiology Mattia Pirolo verfasserin aut Prabha Subramani verfasserin aut Ronette Gehring verfasserin aut Peter Damborg verfasserin aut Henrik Franzyk verfasserin aut Luca Guardabassi verfasserin aut In mSphere American Society for Microbiology, 2016 7(2022), 5 (DE-627)845748807 (DE-600)2844248-9 23795042 nnns volume:7 year:2022 number:5 https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00402-22 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780 kostenfrei https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/msphere.00402-22 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2379-5042 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2022 5 |
| spelling |
10.1128/msphere.00402-22 doi (DE-627)DOAJ027438120 (DE-599)DOAJbab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QR1-502 Yibing Ma verfasserin aut Macrolide Resistance and In Vitro Potentiation by Peptidomimetics in Porcine Clinical Escherichia coli 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ABSTRACT Escherichia coli is intrinsically resistant to macrolides due to outer membrane impermeability, but may also acquire macrolide resistance genes by horizontal transfer. We evaluated the prevalence and types of acquired macrolide resistance determinants in pig clinical E. coli, and we assessed the ability of peptidomimetics to potentiate different macrolide subclasses against strains resistant to neomycin, a first-line antibiotic in the treatment of pig-enteric infections. The erythromycin MIC distribution was determined in 324 pig clinical E. coli isolates, and 62 neomycin-resistant isolates were further characterized by genome sequencing and MIC testing of azithromycin, spiramycin, tilmicosin, and tylosin. The impact on potency achieved by combining these macrolides with three selected peptidomimetic compounds was determined by checkerboard assays in six strains representing different genetic lineages and macrolide resistance gene profiles. Erythromycin MICs ranged from 16 to <1,024 μg/mL. Azithromycin showed the highest potency in wild-type strains (1 to 8 μg/mL), followed by erythromycin (16 to 128 μg/mL), tilmicosin (32 to 256 μg/mL), and spiramycin (128 to 256 μg/mL). Isolates with elevated MIC mainly carried erm(B), either alone or in combination with other acquired macrolide resistance genes, including erm(42), mef(C), mph(A), mph(B), and mph(G). All peptidomimetic-macrolide combinations exhibited synergy (fractional inhibitory concentration index [FICI] < 0.5) with a 4- to 32-fold decrease in the MICs of macrolides. Interestingly, the MICs of tilmicosin in wild-type strains were reduced to concentrations (4 to 16 μg/mL) that can be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration, indicating that peptidomimetics can potentially be employed for repurposing tilmicosin in the management of E. coli enteritis in pigs. IMPORTANCE Acquired macrolide resistance is poorly studied in Escherichia coli because of intrinsic resistance and limited antimicrobial activity in Gram-negative bacteria. This study reveals new information on the prevalence and distribution of macrolide resistance determinants in a comprehensive collection of porcine clinical E. coli from Denmark. Our results contribute to understanding the correlation between genotypic and phenotypic macrolide resistance in E. coli. From a clinical standpoint, our study provides an initial proof of concept that peptidomimetics can resensitize E. coli to macrolide concentrations that may be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration. The latter result has implications for animal health and potential applications in veterinary antimicrobial drug development in view of the high rates of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli isolated from enteric infections in pigs and the lack of viable alternatives for treating these infections. macrolide resistance E. coli pigs enteritis peptidomimetics antibiotic potentiation Microbiology Mattia Pirolo verfasserin aut Prabha Subramani verfasserin aut Ronette Gehring verfasserin aut Peter Damborg verfasserin aut Henrik Franzyk verfasserin aut Luca Guardabassi verfasserin aut In mSphere American Society for Microbiology, 2016 7(2022), 5 (DE-627)845748807 (DE-600)2844248-9 23795042 nnns volume:7 year:2022 number:5 https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00402-22 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780 kostenfrei https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/msphere.00402-22 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2379-5042 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2022 5 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1128/msphere.00402-22 doi (DE-627)DOAJ027438120 (DE-599)DOAJbab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QR1-502 Yibing Ma verfasserin aut Macrolide Resistance and In Vitro Potentiation by Peptidomimetics in Porcine Clinical Escherichia coli 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ABSTRACT Escherichia coli is intrinsically resistant to macrolides due to outer membrane impermeability, but may also acquire macrolide resistance genes by horizontal transfer. We evaluated the prevalence and types of acquired macrolide resistance determinants in pig clinical E. coli, and we assessed the ability of peptidomimetics to potentiate different macrolide subclasses against strains resistant to neomycin, a first-line antibiotic in the treatment of pig-enteric infections. The erythromycin MIC distribution was determined in 324 pig clinical E. coli isolates, and 62 neomycin-resistant isolates were further characterized by genome sequencing and MIC testing of azithromycin, spiramycin, tilmicosin, and tylosin. The impact on potency achieved by combining these macrolides with three selected peptidomimetic compounds was determined by checkerboard assays in six strains representing different genetic lineages and macrolide resistance gene profiles. Erythromycin MICs ranged from 16 to <1,024 μg/mL. Azithromycin showed the highest potency in wild-type strains (1 to 8 μg/mL), followed by erythromycin (16 to 128 μg/mL), tilmicosin (32 to 256 μg/mL), and spiramycin (128 to 256 μg/mL). Isolates with elevated MIC mainly carried erm(B), either alone or in combination with other acquired macrolide resistance genes, including erm(42), mef(C), mph(A), mph(B), and mph(G). All peptidomimetic-macrolide combinations exhibited synergy (fractional inhibitory concentration index [FICI] < 0.5) with a 4- to 32-fold decrease in the MICs of macrolides. Interestingly, the MICs of tilmicosin in wild-type strains were reduced to concentrations (4 to 16 μg/mL) that can be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration, indicating that peptidomimetics can potentially be employed for repurposing tilmicosin in the management of E. coli enteritis in pigs. IMPORTANCE Acquired macrolide resistance is poorly studied in Escherichia coli because of intrinsic resistance and limited antimicrobial activity in Gram-negative bacteria. This study reveals new information on the prevalence and distribution of macrolide resistance determinants in a comprehensive collection of porcine clinical E. coli from Denmark. Our results contribute to understanding the correlation between genotypic and phenotypic macrolide resistance in E. coli. From a clinical standpoint, our study provides an initial proof of concept that peptidomimetics can resensitize E. coli to macrolide concentrations that may be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration. The latter result has implications for animal health and potential applications in veterinary antimicrobial drug development in view of the high rates of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli isolated from enteric infections in pigs and the lack of viable alternatives for treating these infections. macrolide resistance E. coli pigs enteritis peptidomimetics antibiotic potentiation Microbiology Mattia Pirolo verfasserin aut Prabha Subramani verfasserin aut Ronette Gehring verfasserin aut Peter Damborg verfasserin aut Henrik Franzyk verfasserin aut Luca Guardabassi verfasserin aut In mSphere American Society for Microbiology, 2016 7(2022), 5 (DE-627)845748807 (DE-600)2844248-9 23795042 nnns volume:7 year:2022 number:5 https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00402-22 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780 kostenfrei https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/msphere.00402-22 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2379-5042 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2022 5 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1128/msphere.00402-22 doi (DE-627)DOAJ027438120 (DE-599)DOAJbab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QR1-502 Yibing Ma verfasserin aut Macrolide Resistance and In Vitro Potentiation by Peptidomimetics in Porcine Clinical Escherichia coli 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ABSTRACT Escherichia coli is intrinsically resistant to macrolides due to outer membrane impermeability, but may also acquire macrolide resistance genes by horizontal transfer. We evaluated the prevalence and types of acquired macrolide resistance determinants in pig clinical E. coli, and we assessed the ability of peptidomimetics to potentiate different macrolide subclasses against strains resistant to neomycin, a first-line antibiotic in the treatment of pig-enteric infections. The erythromycin MIC distribution was determined in 324 pig clinical E. coli isolates, and 62 neomycin-resistant isolates were further characterized by genome sequencing and MIC testing of azithromycin, spiramycin, tilmicosin, and tylosin. The impact on potency achieved by combining these macrolides with three selected peptidomimetic compounds was determined by checkerboard assays in six strains representing different genetic lineages and macrolide resistance gene profiles. Erythromycin MICs ranged from 16 to <1,024 μg/mL. Azithromycin showed the highest potency in wild-type strains (1 to 8 μg/mL), followed by erythromycin (16 to 128 μg/mL), tilmicosin (32 to 256 μg/mL), and spiramycin (128 to 256 μg/mL). Isolates with elevated MIC mainly carried erm(B), either alone or in combination with other acquired macrolide resistance genes, including erm(42), mef(C), mph(A), mph(B), and mph(G). All peptidomimetic-macrolide combinations exhibited synergy (fractional inhibitory concentration index [FICI] < 0.5) with a 4- to 32-fold decrease in the MICs of macrolides. Interestingly, the MICs of tilmicosin in wild-type strains were reduced to concentrations (4 to 16 μg/mL) that can be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration, indicating that peptidomimetics can potentially be employed for repurposing tilmicosin in the management of E. coli enteritis in pigs. IMPORTANCE Acquired macrolide resistance is poorly studied in Escherichia coli because of intrinsic resistance and limited antimicrobial activity in Gram-negative bacteria. This study reveals new information on the prevalence and distribution of macrolide resistance determinants in a comprehensive collection of porcine clinical E. coli from Denmark. Our results contribute to understanding the correlation between genotypic and phenotypic macrolide resistance in E. coli. From a clinical standpoint, our study provides an initial proof of concept that peptidomimetics can resensitize E. coli to macrolide concentrations that may be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration. The latter result has implications for animal health and potential applications in veterinary antimicrobial drug development in view of the high rates of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli isolated from enteric infections in pigs and the lack of viable alternatives for treating these infections. macrolide resistance E. coli pigs enteritis peptidomimetics antibiotic potentiation Microbiology Mattia Pirolo verfasserin aut Prabha Subramani verfasserin aut Ronette Gehring verfasserin aut Peter Damborg verfasserin aut Henrik Franzyk verfasserin aut Luca Guardabassi verfasserin aut In mSphere American Society for Microbiology, 2016 7(2022), 5 (DE-627)845748807 (DE-600)2844248-9 23795042 nnns volume:7 year:2022 number:5 https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00402-22 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780 kostenfrei https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/msphere.00402-22 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2379-5042 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2022 5 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1128/msphere.00402-22 doi (DE-627)DOAJ027438120 (DE-599)DOAJbab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QR1-502 Yibing Ma verfasserin aut Macrolide Resistance and In Vitro Potentiation by Peptidomimetics in Porcine Clinical Escherichia coli 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ABSTRACT Escherichia coli is intrinsically resistant to macrolides due to outer membrane impermeability, but may also acquire macrolide resistance genes by horizontal transfer. We evaluated the prevalence and types of acquired macrolide resistance determinants in pig clinical E. coli, and we assessed the ability of peptidomimetics to potentiate different macrolide subclasses against strains resistant to neomycin, a first-line antibiotic in the treatment of pig-enteric infections. The erythromycin MIC distribution was determined in 324 pig clinical E. coli isolates, and 62 neomycin-resistant isolates were further characterized by genome sequencing and MIC testing of azithromycin, spiramycin, tilmicosin, and tylosin. The impact on potency achieved by combining these macrolides with three selected peptidomimetic compounds was determined by checkerboard assays in six strains representing different genetic lineages and macrolide resistance gene profiles. Erythromycin MICs ranged from 16 to <1,024 μg/mL. Azithromycin showed the highest potency in wild-type strains (1 to 8 μg/mL), followed by erythromycin (16 to 128 μg/mL), tilmicosin (32 to 256 μg/mL), and spiramycin (128 to 256 μg/mL). Isolates with elevated MIC mainly carried erm(B), either alone or in combination with other acquired macrolide resistance genes, including erm(42), mef(C), mph(A), mph(B), and mph(G). All peptidomimetic-macrolide combinations exhibited synergy (fractional inhibitory concentration index [FICI] < 0.5) with a 4- to 32-fold decrease in the MICs of macrolides. Interestingly, the MICs of tilmicosin in wild-type strains were reduced to concentrations (4 to 16 μg/mL) that can be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration, indicating that peptidomimetics can potentially be employed for repurposing tilmicosin in the management of E. coli enteritis in pigs. IMPORTANCE Acquired macrolide resistance is poorly studied in Escherichia coli because of intrinsic resistance and limited antimicrobial activity in Gram-negative bacteria. This study reveals new information on the prevalence and distribution of macrolide resistance determinants in a comprehensive collection of porcine clinical E. coli from Denmark. Our results contribute to understanding the correlation between genotypic and phenotypic macrolide resistance in E. coli. From a clinical standpoint, our study provides an initial proof of concept that peptidomimetics can resensitize E. coli to macrolide concentrations that may be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration. The latter result has implications for animal health and potential applications in veterinary antimicrobial drug development in view of the high rates of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli isolated from enteric infections in pigs and the lack of viable alternatives for treating these infections. macrolide resistance E. coli pigs enteritis peptidomimetics antibiotic potentiation Microbiology Mattia Pirolo verfasserin aut Prabha Subramani verfasserin aut Ronette Gehring verfasserin aut Peter Damborg verfasserin aut Henrik Franzyk verfasserin aut Luca Guardabassi verfasserin aut In mSphere American Society for Microbiology, 2016 7(2022), 5 (DE-627)845748807 (DE-600)2844248-9 23795042 nnns volume:7 year:2022 number:5 https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00402-22 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780 kostenfrei https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/msphere.00402-22 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2379-5042 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2022 5 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In mSphere 7(2022), 5 volume:7 year:2022 number:5 |
| sourceStr |
In mSphere 7(2022), 5 volume:7 year:2022 number:5 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
macrolide resistance E. coli pigs enteritis peptidomimetics antibiotic potentiation Microbiology |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
mSphere |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Yibing Ma @@aut@@ Mattia Pirolo @@aut@@ Prabha Subramani @@aut@@ Ronette Gehring @@aut@@ Peter Damborg @@aut@@ Henrik Franzyk @@aut@@ Luca Guardabassi @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
845748807 |
| id |
DOAJ027438120 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ027438120</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307113950.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1128/msphere.00402-22</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ027438120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJbab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QR1-502</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yibing Ma</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Macrolide Resistance and In Vitro Potentiation by Peptidomimetics in Porcine Clinical Escherichia coli</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ABSTRACT Escherichia coli is intrinsically resistant to macrolides due to outer membrane impermeability, but may also acquire macrolide resistance genes by horizontal transfer. We evaluated the prevalence and types of acquired macrolide resistance determinants in pig clinical E. coli, and we assessed the ability of peptidomimetics to potentiate different macrolide subclasses against strains resistant to neomycin, a first-line antibiotic in the treatment of pig-enteric infections. The erythromycin MIC distribution was determined in 324 pig clinical E. coli isolates, and 62 neomycin-resistant isolates were further characterized by genome sequencing and MIC testing of azithromycin, spiramycin, tilmicosin, and tylosin. The impact on potency achieved by combining these macrolides with three selected peptidomimetic compounds was determined by checkerboard assays in six strains representing different genetic lineages and macrolide resistance gene profiles. Erythromycin MICs ranged from 16 to <1,024 μg/mL. Azithromycin showed the highest potency in wild-type strains (1 to 8 μg/mL), followed by erythromycin (16 to 128 μg/mL), tilmicosin (32 to 256 μg/mL), and spiramycin (128 to 256 μg/mL). Isolates with elevated MIC mainly carried erm(B), either alone or in combination with other acquired macrolide resistance genes, including erm(42), mef(C), mph(A), mph(B), and mph(G). All peptidomimetic-macrolide combinations exhibited synergy (fractional inhibitory concentration index [FICI] < 0.5) with a 4- to 32-fold decrease in the MICs of macrolides. Interestingly, the MICs of tilmicosin in wild-type strains were reduced to concentrations (4 to 16 μg/mL) that can be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration, indicating that peptidomimetics can potentially be employed for repurposing tilmicosin in the management of E. coli enteritis in pigs. IMPORTANCE Acquired macrolide resistance is poorly studied in Escherichia coli because of intrinsic resistance and limited antimicrobial activity in Gram-negative bacteria. This study reveals new information on the prevalence and distribution of macrolide resistance determinants in a comprehensive collection of porcine clinical E. coli from Denmark. Our results contribute to understanding the correlation between genotypic and phenotypic macrolide resistance in E. coli. From a clinical standpoint, our study provides an initial proof of concept that peptidomimetics can resensitize E. coli to macrolide concentrations that may be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration. The latter result has implications for animal health and potential applications in veterinary antimicrobial drug development in view of the high rates of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli isolated from enteric infections in pigs and the lack of viable alternatives for treating these infections.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">macrolide resistance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">E. coli</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pigs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">enteritis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">peptidomimetics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">antibiotic potentiation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Microbiology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mattia Pirolo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prabha Subramani</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ronette Gehring</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peter Damborg</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Henrik Franzyk</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Luca Guardabassi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">mSphere</subfield><subfield code="d">American Society for Microbiology, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2022), 5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)845748807</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2844248-9</subfield><subfield code="x">23795042</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00402-22</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/bab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/msphere.00402-22</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2379-5042</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
Q - Science |
| author |
Yibing Ma |
| spellingShingle |
Yibing Ma misc QR1-502 misc macrolide resistance misc E. coli misc pigs misc enteritis misc peptidomimetics misc antibiotic potentiation misc Microbiology Macrolide Resistance and In Vitro Potentiation by Peptidomimetics in Porcine Clinical Escherichia coli |
| authorStr |
Yibing Ma |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)845748807 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
QR1-502 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
23795042 |
| topic_title |
QR1-502 Macrolide Resistance and In Vitro Potentiation by Peptidomimetics in Porcine Clinical Escherichia coli macrolide resistance E. coli pigs enteritis peptidomimetics antibiotic potentiation |
| topic |
misc QR1-502 misc macrolide resistance misc E. coli misc pigs misc enteritis misc peptidomimetics misc antibiotic potentiation misc Microbiology |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc QR1-502 misc macrolide resistance misc E. coli misc pigs misc enteritis misc peptidomimetics misc antibiotic potentiation misc Microbiology |
| topic_browse |
misc QR1-502 misc macrolide resistance misc E. coli misc pigs misc enteritis misc peptidomimetics misc antibiotic potentiation misc Microbiology |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
mSphere |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
845748807 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
mSphere |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)845748807 (DE-600)2844248-9 |
| title |
Macrolide Resistance and In Vitro Potentiation by Peptidomimetics in Porcine Clinical Escherichia coli |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ027438120 (DE-599)DOAJbab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780 |
| title_full |
Macrolide Resistance and In Vitro Potentiation by Peptidomimetics in Porcine Clinical Escherichia coli |
| author_sort |
Yibing Ma |
| journal |
mSphere |
| journalStr |
mSphere |
| callnumber-first-code |
Q |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Yibing Ma Mattia Pirolo Prabha Subramani Ronette Gehring Peter Damborg Henrik Franzyk Luca Guardabassi |
| container_volume |
7 |
| class |
QR1-502 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Yibing Ma |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1128/msphere.00402-22 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
macrolide resistance and in vitro potentiation by peptidomimetics in porcine clinical escherichia coli |
| callnumber |
QR1-502 |
| title_auth |
Macrolide Resistance and In Vitro Potentiation by Peptidomimetics in Porcine Clinical Escherichia coli |
| abstract |
ABSTRACT Escherichia coli is intrinsically resistant to macrolides due to outer membrane impermeability, but may also acquire macrolide resistance genes by horizontal transfer. We evaluated the prevalence and types of acquired macrolide resistance determinants in pig clinical E. coli, and we assessed the ability of peptidomimetics to potentiate different macrolide subclasses against strains resistant to neomycin, a first-line antibiotic in the treatment of pig-enteric infections. The erythromycin MIC distribution was determined in 324 pig clinical E. coli isolates, and 62 neomycin-resistant isolates were further characterized by genome sequencing and MIC testing of azithromycin, spiramycin, tilmicosin, and tylosin. The impact on potency achieved by combining these macrolides with three selected peptidomimetic compounds was determined by checkerboard assays in six strains representing different genetic lineages and macrolide resistance gene profiles. Erythromycin MICs ranged from 16 to <1,024 μg/mL. Azithromycin showed the highest potency in wild-type strains (1 to 8 μg/mL), followed by erythromycin (16 to 128 μg/mL), tilmicosin (32 to 256 μg/mL), and spiramycin (128 to 256 μg/mL). Isolates with elevated MIC mainly carried erm(B), either alone or in combination with other acquired macrolide resistance genes, including erm(42), mef(C), mph(A), mph(B), and mph(G). All peptidomimetic-macrolide combinations exhibited synergy (fractional inhibitory concentration index [FICI] < 0.5) with a 4- to 32-fold decrease in the MICs of macrolides. Interestingly, the MICs of tilmicosin in wild-type strains were reduced to concentrations (4 to 16 μg/mL) that can be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration, indicating that peptidomimetics can potentially be employed for repurposing tilmicosin in the management of E. coli enteritis in pigs. IMPORTANCE Acquired macrolide resistance is poorly studied in Escherichia coli because of intrinsic resistance and limited antimicrobial activity in Gram-negative bacteria. This study reveals new information on the prevalence and distribution of macrolide resistance determinants in a comprehensive collection of porcine clinical E. coli from Denmark. Our results contribute to understanding the correlation between genotypic and phenotypic macrolide resistance in E. coli. From a clinical standpoint, our study provides an initial proof of concept that peptidomimetics can resensitize E. coli to macrolide concentrations that may be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration. The latter result has implications for animal health and potential applications in veterinary antimicrobial drug development in view of the high rates of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli isolated from enteric infections in pigs and the lack of viable alternatives for treating these infections. |
| abstractGer |
ABSTRACT Escherichia coli is intrinsically resistant to macrolides due to outer membrane impermeability, but may also acquire macrolide resistance genes by horizontal transfer. We evaluated the prevalence and types of acquired macrolide resistance determinants in pig clinical E. coli, and we assessed the ability of peptidomimetics to potentiate different macrolide subclasses against strains resistant to neomycin, a first-line antibiotic in the treatment of pig-enteric infections. The erythromycin MIC distribution was determined in 324 pig clinical E. coli isolates, and 62 neomycin-resistant isolates were further characterized by genome sequencing and MIC testing of azithromycin, spiramycin, tilmicosin, and tylosin. The impact on potency achieved by combining these macrolides with three selected peptidomimetic compounds was determined by checkerboard assays in six strains representing different genetic lineages and macrolide resistance gene profiles. Erythromycin MICs ranged from 16 to <1,024 μg/mL. Azithromycin showed the highest potency in wild-type strains (1 to 8 μg/mL), followed by erythromycin (16 to 128 μg/mL), tilmicosin (32 to 256 μg/mL), and spiramycin (128 to 256 μg/mL). Isolates with elevated MIC mainly carried erm(B), either alone or in combination with other acquired macrolide resistance genes, including erm(42), mef(C), mph(A), mph(B), and mph(G). All peptidomimetic-macrolide combinations exhibited synergy (fractional inhibitory concentration index [FICI] < 0.5) with a 4- to 32-fold decrease in the MICs of macrolides. Interestingly, the MICs of tilmicosin in wild-type strains were reduced to concentrations (4 to 16 μg/mL) that can be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration, indicating that peptidomimetics can potentially be employed for repurposing tilmicosin in the management of E. coli enteritis in pigs. IMPORTANCE Acquired macrolide resistance is poorly studied in Escherichia coli because of intrinsic resistance and limited antimicrobial activity in Gram-negative bacteria. This study reveals new information on the prevalence and distribution of macrolide resistance determinants in a comprehensive collection of porcine clinical E. coli from Denmark. Our results contribute to understanding the correlation between genotypic and phenotypic macrolide resistance in E. coli. From a clinical standpoint, our study provides an initial proof of concept that peptidomimetics can resensitize E. coli to macrolide concentrations that may be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration. The latter result has implications for animal health and potential applications in veterinary antimicrobial drug development in view of the high rates of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli isolated from enteric infections in pigs and the lack of viable alternatives for treating these infections. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
ABSTRACT Escherichia coli is intrinsically resistant to macrolides due to outer membrane impermeability, but may also acquire macrolide resistance genes by horizontal transfer. We evaluated the prevalence and types of acquired macrolide resistance determinants in pig clinical E. coli, and we assessed the ability of peptidomimetics to potentiate different macrolide subclasses against strains resistant to neomycin, a first-line antibiotic in the treatment of pig-enteric infections. The erythromycin MIC distribution was determined in 324 pig clinical E. coli isolates, and 62 neomycin-resistant isolates were further characterized by genome sequencing and MIC testing of azithromycin, spiramycin, tilmicosin, and tylosin. The impact on potency achieved by combining these macrolides with three selected peptidomimetic compounds was determined by checkerboard assays in six strains representing different genetic lineages and macrolide resistance gene profiles. Erythromycin MICs ranged from 16 to <1,024 μg/mL. Azithromycin showed the highest potency in wild-type strains (1 to 8 μg/mL), followed by erythromycin (16 to 128 μg/mL), tilmicosin (32 to 256 μg/mL), and spiramycin (128 to 256 μg/mL). Isolates with elevated MIC mainly carried erm(B), either alone or in combination with other acquired macrolide resistance genes, including erm(42), mef(C), mph(A), mph(B), and mph(G). All peptidomimetic-macrolide combinations exhibited synergy (fractional inhibitory concentration index [FICI] < 0.5) with a 4- to 32-fold decrease in the MICs of macrolides. Interestingly, the MICs of tilmicosin in wild-type strains were reduced to concentrations (4 to 16 μg/mL) that can be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration, indicating that peptidomimetics can potentially be employed for repurposing tilmicosin in the management of E. coli enteritis in pigs. IMPORTANCE Acquired macrolide resistance is poorly studied in Escherichia coli because of intrinsic resistance and limited antimicrobial activity in Gram-negative bacteria. This study reveals new information on the prevalence and distribution of macrolide resistance determinants in a comprehensive collection of porcine clinical E. coli from Denmark. Our results contribute to understanding the correlation between genotypic and phenotypic macrolide resistance in E. coli. From a clinical standpoint, our study provides an initial proof of concept that peptidomimetics can resensitize E. coli to macrolide concentrations that may be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration. The latter result has implications for animal health and potential applications in veterinary antimicrobial drug development in view of the high rates of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli isolated from enteric infections in pigs and the lack of viable alternatives for treating these infections. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
5 |
| title_short |
Macrolide Resistance and In Vitro Potentiation by Peptidomimetics in Porcine Clinical Escherichia coli |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00402-22 https://doaj.org/article/bab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780 https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/msphere.00402-22 https://doaj.org/toc/2379-5042 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Mattia Pirolo Prabha Subramani Ronette Gehring Peter Damborg Henrik Franzyk Luca Guardabassi |
| author2Str |
Mattia Pirolo Prabha Subramani Ronette Gehring Peter Damborg Henrik Franzyk Luca Guardabassi |
| ppnlink |
845748807 |
| callnumber-subject |
QR - Microbiology |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1128/msphere.00402-22 |
| callnumber-a |
QR1-502 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T01:42:14.899Z |
| _version_ |
1803610840001150976 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ027438120</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307113950.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1128/msphere.00402-22</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ027438120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJbab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QR1-502</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yibing Ma</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Macrolide Resistance and In Vitro Potentiation by Peptidomimetics in Porcine Clinical Escherichia coli</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ABSTRACT Escherichia coli is intrinsically resistant to macrolides due to outer membrane impermeability, but may also acquire macrolide resistance genes by horizontal transfer. We evaluated the prevalence and types of acquired macrolide resistance determinants in pig clinical E. coli, and we assessed the ability of peptidomimetics to potentiate different macrolide subclasses against strains resistant to neomycin, a first-line antibiotic in the treatment of pig-enteric infections. The erythromycin MIC distribution was determined in 324 pig clinical E. coli isolates, and 62 neomycin-resistant isolates were further characterized by genome sequencing and MIC testing of azithromycin, spiramycin, tilmicosin, and tylosin. The impact on potency achieved by combining these macrolides with three selected peptidomimetic compounds was determined by checkerboard assays in six strains representing different genetic lineages and macrolide resistance gene profiles. Erythromycin MICs ranged from 16 to <1,024 μg/mL. Azithromycin showed the highest potency in wild-type strains (1 to 8 μg/mL), followed by erythromycin (16 to 128 μg/mL), tilmicosin (32 to 256 μg/mL), and spiramycin (128 to 256 μg/mL). Isolates with elevated MIC mainly carried erm(B), either alone or in combination with other acquired macrolide resistance genes, including erm(42), mef(C), mph(A), mph(B), and mph(G). All peptidomimetic-macrolide combinations exhibited synergy (fractional inhibitory concentration index [FICI] < 0.5) with a 4- to 32-fold decrease in the MICs of macrolides. Interestingly, the MICs of tilmicosin in wild-type strains were reduced to concentrations (4 to 16 μg/mL) that can be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration, indicating that peptidomimetics can potentially be employed for repurposing tilmicosin in the management of E. coli enteritis in pigs. IMPORTANCE Acquired macrolide resistance is poorly studied in Escherichia coli because of intrinsic resistance and limited antimicrobial activity in Gram-negative bacteria. This study reveals new information on the prevalence and distribution of macrolide resistance determinants in a comprehensive collection of porcine clinical E. coli from Denmark. Our results contribute to understanding the correlation between genotypic and phenotypic macrolide resistance in E. coli. From a clinical standpoint, our study provides an initial proof of concept that peptidomimetics can resensitize E. coli to macrolide concentrations that may be achieved in the pig intestinal tract after oral administration. The latter result has implications for animal health and potential applications in veterinary antimicrobial drug development in view of the high rates of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli isolated from enteric infections in pigs and the lack of viable alternatives for treating these infections.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">macrolide resistance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">E. coli</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pigs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">enteritis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">peptidomimetics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">antibiotic potentiation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Microbiology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mattia Pirolo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prabha Subramani</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ronette Gehring</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peter Damborg</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Henrik Franzyk</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Luca Guardabassi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">mSphere</subfield><subfield code="d">American Society for Microbiology, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2022), 5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)845748807</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2844248-9</subfield><subfield code="x">23795042</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00402-22</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/bab2000b2a7f4b8384675976dbc82780</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/msphere.00402-22</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2379-5042</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4025126 |