Pharmacoeconomic analysis of treatment with nilotinib as the second line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia
Ilmatinib is currently the most widely used tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Russia. When patients develop resistance or intolerance to imatinib, second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Tkis) are used. in Russia, nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutini...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
N. A. Avxentyev [verfasserIn] M. Yu. Frolov [verfasserIn] A. S. Makarov [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Russisch |
Erschienen: |
2018 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Фармакоэкономика - IRBIS LLC, 2019, 11(2018), 2, Seite 27-37 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:11 ; year:2018 ; number:2 ; pages:27-37 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ027576302 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ027576302 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230410103218.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||rus c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ027576302 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJf64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a rus | ||
050 | 0 | |a RM1-950 | |
050 | 0 | |a HB71-74 | |
100 | 0 | |a N. A. Avxentyev |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Pharmacoeconomic analysis of treatment with nilotinib as the second line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia |
264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Ilmatinib is currently the most widely used tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Russia. When patients develop resistance or intolerance to imatinib, second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Tkis) are used. in Russia, nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib are registered in second-line, however only dasatinib is included in the government drug reimbursement program.The aim of this study was to conduct a pharmacoeconomic comparison of nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib as second-line treatments for patients with CML from the Russian healthcare system perspective.Materials and methods. Using the clinical trial data we developed a Markov model of CML progression on nilotinib, dasatinib or bosutinib second-line therapy and calculated the medical costs per patient. Both costeffectiveness analysis and budget-impact analysis reflected the local practice and the drug reimbursement approval process.Results. The average medical cost (per year) for nilotinib (1 683 thousand rubles or US$27 075) was 8.4% lower than that for dasatinib and 35.2% lower than for bosutinib. The 4-year total medical cost of treatment with nilotinib was 4 372 thousand rubles (US$ 70 336), which was 13.9% lower compared to dasatinib and 37.3% lower compared to bosutinib. nilotinib also had a lower cost/effectiveness ratio (US$ 1 602, 1 910 and 2 537 per life month for nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib, respectively). The estimated number of patients in Russia who need second-line treatment for CML is 996 patients. if nilotinib were included in the Government Reimbursement Program, a saving of 771 million rubles (US$ 12,4 million) over four years would be reached.Conclusions. When compared with dasatinib or bosutinib, nilotinib is the cost-saving option for the second-line treatment of CML patients in Russia. | ||
650 | 4 | |a chronic myeloid leukemia | |
650 | 4 | |a tyrosine kinase inhibitors | |
650 | 4 | |a imatinib | |
650 | 4 | |a nilotinib | |
650 | 4 | |a dasatinib | |
650 | 4 | |a bosutinib | |
650 | 4 | |a pharmacoeconomic evaluation | |
650 | 4 | |a government drug reimbursement program | |
653 | 0 | |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology | |
653 | 0 | |a Economics as a science | |
700 | 0 | |a M. Yu. Frolov |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a A. S. Makarov |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Фармакоэкономика |d IRBIS LLC, 2019 |g 11(2018), 2, Seite 27-37 |w (DE-627)176061677X |x 20704933 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2018 |g number:2 |g pages:27-37 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/f64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/248 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4909 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4933 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 11 |j 2018 |e 2 |h 27-37 |
author_variant |
n a a naa m y f myf a s m asm |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:20704933:2018----::hraocnmcnlssframnwtnltnbshscnlnteaynain |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2018 |
callnumber-subject-code |
RM |
publishDate |
2018 |
allfields |
10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037 doi (DE-627)DOAJ027576302 (DE-599)DOAJf64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus RM1-950 HB71-74 N. A. Avxentyev verfasserin aut Pharmacoeconomic analysis of treatment with nilotinib as the second line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Ilmatinib is currently the most widely used tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Russia. When patients develop resistance or intolerance to imatinib, second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Tkis) are used. in Russia, nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib are registered in second-line, however only dasatinib is included in the government drug reimbursement program.The aim of this study was to conduct a pharmacoeconomic comparison of nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib as second-line treatments for patients with CML from the Russian healthcare system perspective.Materials and methods. Using the clinical trial data we developed a Markov model of CML progression on nilotinib, dasatinib or bosutinib second-line therapy and calculated the medical costs per patient. Both costeffectiveness analysis and budget-impact analysis reflected the local practice and the drug reimbursement approval process.Results. The average medical cost (per year) for nilotinib (1 683 thousand rubles or US$27 075) was 8.4% lower than that for dasatinib and 35.2% lower than for bosutinib. The 4-year total medical cost of treatment with nilotinib was 4 372 thousand rubles (US$ 70 336), which was 13.9% lower compared to dasatinib and 37.3% lower compared to bosutinib. nilotinib also had a lower cost/effectiveness ratio (US$ 1 602, 1 910 and 2 537 per life month for nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib, respectively). The estimated number of patients in Russia who need second-line treatment for CML is 996 patients. if nilotinib were included in the Government Reimbursement Program, a saving of 771 million rubles (US$ 12,4 million) over four years would be reached.Conclusions. When compared with dasatinib or bosutinib, nilotinib is the cost-saving option for the second-line treatment of CML patients in Russia. chronic myeloid leukemia tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib nilotinib dasatinib bosutinib pharmacoeconomic evaluation government drug reimbursement program Therapeutics. Pharmacology Economics as a science M. Yu. Frolov verfasserin aut A. S. Makarov verfasserin aut In Фармакоэкономика IRBIS LLC, 2019 11(2018), 2, Seite 27-37 (DE-627)176061677X 20704933 nnns volume:11 year:2018 number:2 pages:27-37 https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d kostenfrei https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/248 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4909 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4933 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2018 2 27-37 |
spelling |
10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037 doi (DE-627)DOAJ027576302 (DE-599)DOAJf64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus RM1-950 HB71-74 N. A. Avxentyev verfasserin aut Pharmacoeconomic analysis of treatment with nilotinib as the second line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Ilmatinib is currently the most widely used tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Russia. When patients develop resistance or intolerance to imatinib, second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Tkis) are used. in Russia, nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib are registered in second-line, however only dasatinib is included in the government drug reimbursement program.The aim of this study was to conduct a pharmacoeconomic comparison of nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib as second-line treatments for patients with CML from the Russian healthcare system perspective.Materials and methods. Using the clinical trial data we developed a Markov model of CML progression on nilotinib, dasatinib or bosutinib second-line therapy and calculated the medical costs per patient. Both costeffectiveness analysis and budget-impact analysis reflected the local practice and the drug reimbursement approval process.Results. The average medical cost (per year) for nilotinib (1 683 thousand rubles or US$27 075) was 8.4% lower than that for dasatinib and 35.2% lower than for bosutinib. The 4-year total medical cost of treatment with nilotinib was 4 372 thousand rubles (US$ 70 336), which was 13.9% lower compared to dasatinib and 37.3% lower compared to bosutinib. nilotinib also had a lower cost/effectiveness ratio (US$ 1 602, 1 910 and 2 537 per life month for nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib, respectively). The estimated number of patients in Russia who need second-line treatment for CML is 996 patients. if nilotinib were included in the Government Reimbursement Program, a saving of 771 million rubles (US$ 12,4 million) over four years would be reached.Conclusions. When compared with dasatinib or bosutinib, nilotinib is the cost-saving option for the second-line treatment of CML patients in Russia. chronic myeloid leukemia tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib nilotinib dasatinib bosutinib pharmacoeconomic evaluation government drug reimbursement program Therapeutics. Pharmacology Economics as a science M. Yu. Frolov verfasserin aut A. S. Makarov verfasserin aut In Фармакоэкономика IRBIS LLC, 2019 11(2018), 2, Seite 27-37 (DE-627)176061677X 20704933 nnns volume:11 year:2018 number:2 pages:27-37 https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d kostenfrei https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/248 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4909 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4933 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2018 2 27-37 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037 doi (DE-627)DOAJ027576302 (DE-599)DOAJf64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus RM1-950 HB71-74 N. A. Avxentyev verfasserin aut Pharmacoeconomic analysis of treatment with nilotinib as the second line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Ilmatinib is currently the most widely used tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Russia. When patients develop resistance or intolerance to imatinib, second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Tkis) are used. in Russia, nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib are registered in second-line, however only dasatinib is included in the government drug reimbursement program.The aim of this study was to conduct a pharmacoeconomic comparison of nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib as second-line treatments for patients with CML from the Russian healthcare system perspective.Materials and methods. Using the clinical trial data we developed a Markov model of CML progression on nilotinib, dasatinib or bosutinib second-line therapy and calculated the medical costs per patient. Both costeffectiveness analysis and budget-impact analysis reflected the local practice and the drug reimbursement approval process.Results. The average medical cost (per year) for nilotinib (1 683 thousand rubles or US$27 075) was 8.4% lower than that for dasatinib and 35.2% lower than for bosutinib. The 4-year total medical cost of treatment with nilotinib was 4 372 thousand rubles (US$ 70 336), which was 13.9% lower compared to dasatinib and 37.3% lower compared to bosutinib. nilotinib also had a lower cost/effectiveness ratio (US$ 1 602, 1 910 and 2 537 per life month for nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib, respectively). The estimated number of patients in Russia who need second-line treatment for CML is 996 patients. if nilotinib were included in the Government Reimbursement Program, a saving of 771 million rubles (US$ 12,4 million) over four years would be reached.Conclusions. When compared with dasatinib or bosutinib, nilotinib is the cost-saving option for the second-line treatment of CML patients in Russia. chronic myeloid leukemia tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib nilotinib dasatinib bosutinib pharmacoeconomic evaluation government drug reimbursement program Therapeutics. Pharmacology Economics as a science M. Yu. Frolov verfasserin aut A. S. Makarov verfasserin aut In Фармакоэкономика IRBIS LLC, 2019 11(2018), 2, Seite 27-37 (DE-627)176061677X 20704933 nnns volume:11 year:2018 number:2 pages:27-37 https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d kostenfrei https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/248 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4909 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4933 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2018 2 27-37 |
allfieldsGer |
10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037 doi (DE-627)DOAJ027576302 (DE-599)DOAJf64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus RM1-950 HB71-74 N. A. Avxentyev verfasserin aut Pharmacoeconomic analysis of treatment with nilotinib as the second line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Ilmatinib is currently the most widely used tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Russia. When patients develop resistance or intolerance to imatinib, second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Tkis) are used. in Russia, nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib are registered in second-line, however only dasatinib is included in the government drug reimbursement program.The aim of this study was to conduct a pharmacoeconomic comparison of nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib as second-line treatments for patients with CML from the Russian healthcare system perspective.Materials and methods. Using the clinical trial data we developed a Markov model of CML progression on nilotinib, dasatinib or bosutinib second-line therapy and calculated the medical costs per patient. Both costeffectiveness analysis and budget-impact analysis reflected the local practice and the drug reimbursement approval process.Results. The average medical cost (per year) for nilotinib (1 683 thousand rubles or US$27 075) was 8.4% lower than that for dasatinib and 35.2% lower than for bosutinib. The 4-year total medical cost of treatment with nilotinib was 4 372 thousand rubles (US$ 70 336), which was 13.9% lower compared to dasatinib and 37.3% lower compared to bosutinib. nilotinib also had a lower cost/effectiveness ratio (US$ 1 602, 1 910 and 2 537 per life month for nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib, respectively). The estimated number of patients in Russia who need second-line treatment for CML is 996 patients. if nilotinib were included in the Government Reimbursement Program, a saving of 771 million rubles (US$ 12,4 million) over four years would be reached.Conclusions. When compared with dasatinib or bosutinib, nilotinib is the cost-saving option for the second-line treatment of CML patients in Russia. chronic myeloid leukemia tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib nilotinib dasatinib bosutinib pharmacoeconomic evaluation government drug reimbursement program Therapeutics. Pharmacology Economics as a science M. Yu. Frolov verfasserin aut A. S. Makarov verfasserin aut In Фармакоэкономика IRBIS LLC, 2019 11(2018), 2, Seite 27-37 (DE-627)176061677X 20704933 nnns volume:11 year:2018 number:2 pages:27-37 https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d kostenfrei https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/248 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4909 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4933 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2018 2 27-37 |
allfieldsSound |
10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037 doi (DE-627)DOAJ027576302 (DE-599)DOAJf64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus RM1-950 HB71-74 N. A. Avxentyev verfasserin aut Pharmacoeconomic analysis of treatment with nilotinib as the second line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Ilmatinib is currently the most widely used tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Russia. When patients develop resistance or intolerance to imatinib, second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Tkis) are used. in Russia, nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib are registered in second-line, however only dasatinib is included in the government drug reimbursement program.The aim of this study was to conduct a pharmacoeconomic comparison of nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib as second-line treatments for patients with CML from the Russian healthcare system perspective.Materials and methods. Using the clinical trial data we developed a Markov model of CML progression on nilotinib, dasatinib or bosutinib second-line therapy and calculated the medical costs per patient. Both costeffectiveness analysis and budget-impact analysis reflected the local practice and the drug reimbursement approval process.Results. The average medical cost (per year) for nilotinib (1 683 thousand rubles or US$27 075) was 8.4% lower than that for dasatinib and 35.2% lower than for bosutinib. The 4-year total medical cost of treatment with nilotinib was 4 372 thousand rubles (US$ 70 336), which was 13.9% lower compared to dasatinib and 37.3% lower compared to bosutinib. nilotinib also had a lower cost/effectiveness ratio (US$ 1 602, 1 910 and 2 537 per life month for nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib, respectively). The estimated number of patients in Russia who need second-line treatment for CML is 996 patients. if nilotinib were included in the Government Reimbursement Program, a saving of 771 million rubles (US$ 12,4 million) over four years would be reached.Conclusions. When compared with dasatinib or bosutinib, nilotinib is the cost-saving option for the second-line treatment of CML patients in Russia. chronic myeloid leukemia tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib nilotinib dasatinib bosutinib pharmacoeconomic evaluation government drug reimbursement program Therapeutics. Pharmacology Economics as a science M. Yu. Frolov verfasserin aut A. S. Makarov verfasserin aut In Фармакоэкономика IRBIS LLC, 2019 11(2018), 2, Seite 27-37 (DE-627)176061677X 20704933 nnns volume:11 year:2018 number:2 pages:27-37 https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d kostenfrei https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/248 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4909 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4933 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2018 2 27-37 |
language |
Russian |
source |
In Фармакоэкономика 11(2018), 2, Seite 27-37 volume:11 year:2018 number:2 pages:27-37 |
sourceStr |
In Фармакоэкономика 11(2018), 2, Seite 27-37 volume:11 year:2018 number:2 pages:27-37 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
chronic myeloid leukemia tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib nilotinib dasatinib bosutinib pharmacoeconomic evaluation government drug reimbursement program Therapeutics. Pharmacology Economics as a science |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Фармакоэкономика |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
N. A. Avxentyev @@aut@@ M. Yu. Frolov @@aut@@ A. S. Makarov @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
176061677X |
id |
DOAJ027576302 |
language_de |
russisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ027576302</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230410103218.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||rus c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ027576302</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJf64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RM1-950</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HB71-74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N. A. Avxentyev</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pharmacoeconomic analysis of treatment with nilotinib as the second line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ilmatinib is currently the most widely used tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Russia. When patients develop resistance or intolerance to imatinib, second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Tkis) are used. in Russia, nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib are registered in second-line, however only dasatinib is included in the government drug reimbursement program.The aim of this study was to conduct a pharmacoeconomic comparison of nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib as second-line treatments for patients with CML from the Russian healthcare system perspective.Materials and methods. Using the clinical trial data we developed a Markov model of CML progression on nilotinib, dasatinib or bosutinib second-line therapy and calculated the medical costs per patient. Both costeffectiveness analysis and budget-impact analysis reflected the local practice and the drug reimbursement approval process.Results. The average medical cost (per year) for nilotinib (1 683 thousand rubles or US$27 075) was 8.4% lower than that for dasatinib and 35.2% lower than for bosutinib. The 4-year total medical cost of treatment with nilotinib was 4 372 thousand rubles (US$ 70 336), which was 13.9% lower compared to dasatinib and 37.3% lower compared to bosutinib. nilotinib also had a lower cost/effectiveness ratio (US$ 1 602, 1 910 and 2 537 per life month for nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib, respectively). The estimated number of patients in Russia who need second-line treatment for CML is 996 patients. if nilotinib were included in the Government Reimbursement Program, a saving of 771 million rubles (US$ 12,4 million) over four years would be reached.Conclusions. When compared with dasatinib or bosutinib, nilotinib is the cost-saving option for the second-line treatment of CML patients in Russia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">chronic myeloid leukemia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">tyrosine kinase inhibitors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">imatinib</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">nilotinib</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">dasatinib</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bosutinib</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pharmacoeconomic evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">government drug reimbursement program</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Therapeutics. Pharmacology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Economics as a science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">M. Yu. Frolov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A. S. Makarov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Фармакоэкономика</subfield><subfield code="d">IRBIS LLC, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2018), 2, Seite 27-37</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)176061677X</subfield><subfield code="x">20704933</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:27-37</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/f64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/248</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4909</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4933</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">27-37</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
author |
N. A. Avxentyev |
spellingShingle |
N. A. Avxentyev misc RM1-950 misc HB71-74 misc chronic myeloid leukemia misc tyrosine kinase inhibitors misc imatinib misc nilotinib misc dasatinib misc bosutinib misc pharmacoeconomic evaluation misc government drug reimbursement program misc Therapeutics. Pharmacology misc Economics as a science Pharmacoeconomic analysis of treatment with nilotinib as the second line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia |
authorStr |
N. A. Avxentyev |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)176061677X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
RM1-950 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
20704933 |
topic_title |
RM1-950 HB71-74 Pharmacoeconomic analysis of treatment with nilotinib as the second line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia chronic myeloid leukemia tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib nilotinib dasatinib bosutinib pharmacoeconomic evaluation government drug reimbursement program |
topic |
misc RM1-950 misc HB71-74 misc chronic myeloid leukemia misc tyrosine kinase inhibitors misc imatinib misc nilotinib misc dasatinib misc bosutinib misc pharmacoeconomic evaluation misc government drug reimbursement program misc Therapeutics. Pharmacology misc Economics as a science |
topic_unstemmed |
misc RM1-950 misc HB71-74 misc chronic myeloid leukemia misc tyrosine kinase inhibitors misc imatinib misc nilotinib misc dasatinib misc bosutinib misc pharmacoeconomic evaluation misc government drug reimbursement program misc Therapeutics. Pharmacology misc Economics as a science |
topic_browse |
misc RM1-950 misc HB71-74 misc chronic myeloid leukemia misc tyrosine kinase inhibitors misc imatinib misc nilotinib misc dasatinib misc bosutinib misc pharmacoeconomic evaluation misc government drug reimbursement program misc Therapeutics. Pharmacology misc Economics as a science |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Фармакоэкономика |
hierarchy_parent_id |
176061677X |
hierarchy_top_title |
Фармакоэкономика |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)176061677X |
title |
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of treatment with nilotinib as the second line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ027576302 (DE-599)DOAJf64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d |
title_full |
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of treatment with nilotinib as the second line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia |
author_sort |
N. A. Avxentyev |
journal |
Фармакоэкономика |
journalStr |
Фармакоэкономика |
callnumber-first-code |
R |
lang_code |
rus |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2018 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
27 |
author_browse |
N. A. Avxentyev M. Yu. Frolov A. S. Makarov |
container_volume |
11 |
class |
RM1-950 HB71-74 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
N. A. Avxentyev |
doi_str_mv |
10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
pharmacoeconomic analysis of treatment with nilotinib as the second line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia |
callnumber |
RM1-950 |
title_auth |
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of treatment with nilotinib as the second line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia |
abstract |
Ilmatinib is currently the most widely used tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Russia. When patients develop resistance or intolerance to imatinib, second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Tkis) are used. in Russia, nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib are registered in second-line, however only dasatinib is included in the government drug reimbursement program.The aim of this study was to conduct a pharmacoeconomic comparison of nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib as second-line treatments for patients with CML from the Russian healthcare system perspective.Materials and methods. Using the clinical trial data we developed a Markov model of CML progression on nilotinib, dasatinib or bosutinib second-line therapy and calculated the medical costs per patient. Both costeffectiveness analysis and budget-impact analysis reflected the local practice and the drug reimbursement approval process.Results. The average medical cost (per year) for nilotinib (1 683 thousand rubles or US$27 075) was 8.4% lower than that for dasatinib and 35.2% lower than for bosutinib. The 4-year total medical cost of treatment with nilotinib was 4 372 thousand rubles (US$ 70 336), which was 13.9% lower compared to dasatinib and 37.3% lower compared to bosutinib. nilotinib also had a lower cost/effectiveness ratio (US$ 1 602, 1 910 and 2 537 per life month for nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib, respectively). The estimated number of patients in Russia who need second-line treatment for CML is 996 patients. if nilotinib were included in the Government Reimbursement Program, a saving of 771 million rubles (US$ 12,4 million) over four years would be reached.Conclusions. When compared with dasatinib or bosutinib, nilotinib is the cost-saving option for the second-line treatment of CML patients in Russia. |
abstractGer |
Ilmatinib is currently the most widely used tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Russia. When patients develop resistance or intolerance to imatinib, second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Tkis) are used. in Russia, nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib are registered in second-line, however only dasatinib is included in the government drug reimbursement program.The aim of this study was to conduct a pharmacoeconomic comparison of nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib as second-line treatments for patients with CML from the Russian healthcare system perspective.Materials and methods. Using the clinical trial data we developed a Markov model of CML progression on nilotinib, dasatinib or bosutinib second-line therapy and calculated the medical costs per patient. Both costeffectiveness analysis and budget-impact analysis reflected the local practice and the drug reimbursement approval process.Results. The average medical cost (per year) for nilotinib (1 683 thousand rubles or US$27 075) was 8.4% lower than that for dasatinib and 35.2% lower than for bosutinib. The 4-year total medical cost of treatment with nilotinib was 4 372 thousand rubles (US$ 70 336), which was 13.9% lower compared to dasatinib and 37.3% lower compared to bosutinib. nilotinib also had a lower cost/effectiveness ratio (US$ 1 602, 1 910 and 2 537 per life month for nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib, respectively). The estimated number of patients in Russia who need second-line treatment for CML is 996 patients. if nilotinib were included in the Government Reimbursement Program, a saving of 771 million rubles (US$ 12,4 million) over four years would be reached.Conclusions. When compared with dasatinib or bosutinib, nilotinib is the cost-saving option for the second-line treatment of CML patients in Russia. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Ilmatinib is currently the most widely used tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Russia. When patients develop resistance or intolerance to imatinib, second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Tkis) are used. in Russia, nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib are registered in second-line, however only dasatinib is included in the government drug reimbursement program.The aim of this study was to conduct a pharmacoeconomic comparison of nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib as second-line treatments for patients with CML from the Russian healthcare system perspective.Materials and methods. Using the clinical trial data we developed a Markov model of CML progression on nilotinib, dasatinib or bosutinib second-line therapy and calculated the medical costs per patient. Both costeffectiveness analysis and budget-impact analysis reflected the local practice and the drug reimbursement approval process.Results. The average medical cost (per year) for nilotinib (1 683 thousand rubles or US$27 075) was 8.4% lower than that for dasatinib and 35.2% lower than for bosutinib. The 4-year total medical cost of treatment with nilotinib was 4 372 thousand rubles (US$ 70 336), which was 13.9% lower compared to dasatinib and 37.3% lower compared to bosutinib. nilotinib also had a lower cost/effectiveness ratio (US$ 1 602, 1 910 and 2 537 per life month for nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib, respectively). The estimated number of patients in Russia who need second-line treatment for CML is 996 patients. if nilotinib were included in the Government Reimbursement Program, a saving of 771 million rubles (US$ 12,4 million) over four years would be reached.Conclusions. When compared with dasatinib or bosutinib, nilotinib is the cost-saving option for the second-line treatment of CML patients in Russia. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of treatment with nilotinib as the second line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037 https://doaj.org/article/f64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/248 https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4909 https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4933 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
M. Yu. Frolov A. S. Makarov |
author2Str |
M. Yu. Frolov A. S. Makarov |
ppnlink |
176061677X |
callnumber-subject |
RM - Therapeutics and Pharmacology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037 |
callnumber-a |
RM1-950 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T02:12:35.486Z |
_version_ |
1803612749027082240 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ027576302</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230410103218.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||rus c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ027576302</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJf64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RM1-950</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HB71-74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N. A. Avxentyev</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pharmacoeconomic analysis of treatment with nilotinib as the second line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ilmatinib is currently the most widely used tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Russia. When patients develop resistance or intolerance to imatinib, second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Tkis) are used. in Russia, nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib are registered in second-line, however only dasatinib is included in the government drug reimbursement program.The aim of this study was to conduct a pharmacoeconomic comparison of nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib as second-line treatments for patients with CML from the Russian healthcare system perspective.Materials and methods. Using the clinical trial data we developed a Markov model of CML progression on nilotinib, dasatinib or bosutinib second-line therapy and calculated the medical costs per patient. Both costeffectiveness analysis and budget-impact analysis reflected the local practice and the drug reimbursement approval process.Results. The average medical cost (per year) for nilotinib (1 683 thousand rubles or US$27 075) was 8.4% lower than that for dasatinib and 35.2% lower than for bosutinib. The 4-year total medical cost of treatment with nilotinib was 4 372 thousand rubles (US$ 70 336), which was 13.9% lower compared to dasatinib and 37.3% lower compared to bosutinib. nilotinib also had a lower cost/effectiveness ratio (US$ 1 602, 1 910 and 2 537 per life month for nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib, respectively). The estimated number of patients in Russia who need second-line treatment for CML is 996 patients. if nilotinib were included in the Government Reimbursement Program, a saving of 771 million rubles (US$ 12,4 million) over four years would be reached.Conclusions. When compared with dasatinib or bosutinib, nilotinib is the cost-saving option for the second-line treatment of CML patients in Russia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">chronic myeloid leukemia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">tyrosine kinase inhibitors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">imatinib</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">nilotinib</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">dasatinib</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bosutinib</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pharmacoeconomic evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">government drug reimbursement program</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Therapeutics. Pharmacology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Economics as a science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">M. Yu. Frolov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A. S. Makarov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Фармакоэкономика</subfield><subfield code="d">IRBIS LLC, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2018), 2, Seite 27-37</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)176061677X</subfield><subfield code="x">20704933</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:27-37</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.2.027-037</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/f64add991b5e4d718ca8d25ae6d78e4d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/248</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4909</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2070-4933</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">27-37</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401602 |