Which vaginal douching agent is the best choice before oocyte retrieval? A systematic review and network meta-analysis
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate six vaginal douching agents (Iodine, Saline, Iodine followed by saline, chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline, Ozone, Potassium permanganate) on oocytes pick-up related pelvic infection (OPU-PI) and IVF outcome in patients underwent assisted reproduc...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Ying Meng [verfasserIn] Gui H. Wen [verfasserIn] Hong Luo [verfasserIn] Xiu C. Tan [verfasserIn] Li Wang [verfasserIn] Juan Liao [verfasserIn] Hong Peng [verfasserIn] Ling Lan [verfasserIn] Na Yang [verfasserIn] Ying Zhao [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Frontiers in Reproductive Health - Frontiers Media S.A., 2021, 4(2022) |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:4 ; year:2022 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3389/frph.2022.1032062 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ027727386 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ027727386 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230307120445.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3389/frph.2022.1032062 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ027727386 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a QH471-489 | |
050 | 0 | |a R5-920 | |
100 | 0 | |a Ying Meng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Which vaginal douching agent is the best choice before oocyte retrieval? A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate six vaginal douching agents (Iodine, Saline, Iodine followed by saline, chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline, Ozone, Potassium permanganate) on oocytes pick-up related pelvic infection (OPU-PI) and IVF outcome in patients underwent assisted reproduction technology (ART).DesignThrough searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, CINAHL CNKI, only human clinical trials were collected to study the effects of the six vaginal douching agents on OPU-PI and IVF outcomes. The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality by the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and the data analysis software was used to analyze the data accordingly.ResultsThe clinical trials were collected between the earliest available date and June 2022. Eight studies were included, the total sample size used in the study was 12,567. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that Ozone can significantly decrease OPU-PI; Iodine followed by saline can be a antiseptic protocol ranked first without affecting the quality of oocytes and Chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline can improve patients' clinical pregnancy rate.ConclusionBased on Ranking Plot of the Network, this review reports the best evidence available regarding different vaginal douching agents used before OPU. | ||
650 | 4 | |a vaginal douching | |
650 | 4 | |a oocyte retrieval | |
650 | 4 | |a pelvic infection | |
650 | 4 | |a IVF outcome | |
650 | 4 | |a network meta analysis | |
653 | 0 | |a Reproduction | |
653 | 0 | |a Medicine (General) | |
700 | 0 | |a Gui H. Wen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Hong Luo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Xiu C. Tan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Li Wang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Juan Liao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Hong Peng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Ling Lan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Na Yang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Ying Zhao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Frontiers in Reproductive Health |d Frontiers Media S.A., 2021 |g 4(2022) |w (DE-627)1727793331 |w (DE-600)3035401-8 |x 26733153 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2022 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062/full |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2673-3153 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 4 |j 2022 |
author_variant |
y m ym g h w ghw h l hl x c t xct l w lw j l jl h p hp l l ll n y ny y z yz |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:26733153:2022----::hcvgnlociggniteethieeoeoyeereaaytmtce |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
callnumber-subject-code |
QH |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.3389/frph.2022.1032062 doi (DE-627)DOAJ027727386 (DE-599)DOAJ93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH471-489 R5-920 Ying Meng verfasserin aut Which vaginal douching agent is the best choice before oocyte retrieval? A systematic review and network meta-analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate six vaginal douching agents (Iodine, Saline, Iodine followed by saline, chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline, Ozone, Potassium permanganate) on oocytes pick-up related pelvic infection (OPU-PI) and IVF outcome in patients underwent assisted reproduction technology (ART).DesignThrough searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, CINAHL CNKI, only human clinical trials were collected to study the effects of the six vaginal douching agents on OPU-PI and IVF outcomes. The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality by the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and the data analysis software was used to analyze the data accordingly.ResultsThe clinical trials were collected between the earliest available date and June 2022. Eight studies were included, the total sample size used in the study was 12,567. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that Ozone can significantly decrease OPU-PI; Iodine followed by saline can be a antiseptic protocol ranked first without affecting the quality of oocytes and Chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline can improve patients' clinical pregnancy rate.ConclusionBased on Ranking Plot of the Network, this review reports the best evidence available regarding different vaginal douching agents used before OPU. vaginal douching oocyte retrieval pelvic infection IVF outcome network meta analysis Reproduction Medicine (General) Gui H. Wen verfasserin aut Hong Luo verfasserin aut Xiu C. Tan verfasserin aut Li Wang verfasserin aut Juan Liao verfasserin aut Hong Peng verfasserin aut Ling Lan verfasserin aut Na Yang verfasserin aut Ying Zhao verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Reproductive Health Frontiers Media S.A., 2021 4(2022) (DE-627)1727793331 (DE-600)3035401-8 26733153 nnns volume:4 year:2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2673-3153 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2022 |
spelling |
10.3389/frph.2022.1032062 doi (DE-627)DOAJ027727386 (DE-599)DOAJ93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH471-489 R5-920 Ying Meng verfasserin aut Which vaginal douching agent is the best choice before oocyte retrieval? A systematic review and network meta-analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate six vaginal douching agents (Iodine, Saline, Iodine followed by saline, chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline, Ozone, Potassium permanganate) on oocytes pick-up related pelvic infection (OPU-PI) and IVF outcome in patients underwent assisted reproduction technology (ART).DesignThrough searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, CINAHL CNKI, only human clinical trials were collected to study the effects of the six vaginal douching agents on OPU-PI and IVF outcomes. The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality by the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and the data analysis software was used to analyze the data accordingly.ResultsThe clinical trials were collected between the earliest available date and June 2022. Eight studies were included, the total sample size used in the study was 12,567. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that Ozone can significantly decrease OPU-PI; Iodine followed by saline can be a antiseptic protocol ranked first without affecting the quality of oocytes and Chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline can improve patients' clinical pregnancy rate.ConclusionBased on Ranking Plot of the Network, this review reports the best evidence available regarding different vaginal douching agents used before OPU. vaginal douching oocyte retrieval pelvic infection IVF outcome network meta analysis Reproduction Medicine (General) Gui H. Wen verfasserin aut Hong Luo verfasserin aut Xiu C. Tan verfasserin aut Li Wang verfasserin aut Juan Liao verfasserin aut Hong Peng verfasserin aut Ling Lan verfasserin aut Na Yang verfasserin aut Ying Zhao verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Reproductive Health Frontiers Media S.A., 2021 4(2022) (DE-627)1727793331 (DE-600)3035401-8 26733153 nnns volume:4 year:2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2673-3153 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2022 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3389/frph.2022.1032062 doi (DE-627)DOAJ027727386 (DE-599)DOAJ93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH471-489 R5-920 Ying Meng verfasserin aut Which vaginal douching agent is the best choice before oocyte retrieval? A systematic review and network meta-analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate six vaginal douching agents (Iodine, Saline, Iodine followed by saline, chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline, Ozone, Potassium permanganate) on oocytes pick-up related pelvic infection (OPU-PI) and IVF outcome in patients underwent assisted reproduction technology (ART).DesignThrough searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, CINAHL CNKI, only human clinical trials were collected to study the effects of the six vaginal douching agents on OPU-PI and IVF outcomes. The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality by the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and the data analysis software was used to analyze the data accordingly.ResultsThe clinical trials were collected between the earliest available date and June 2022. Eight studies were included, the total sample size used in the study was 12,567. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that Ozone can significantly decrease OPU-PI; Iodine followed by saline can be a antiseptic protocol ranked first without affecting the quality of oocytes and Chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline can improve patients' clinical pregnancy rate.ConclusionBased on Ranking Plot of the Network, this review reports the best evidence available regarding different vaginal douching agents used before OPU. vaginal douching oocyte retrieval pelvic infection IVF outcome network meta analysis Reproduction Medicine (General) Gui H. Wen verfasserin aut Hong Luo verfasserin aut Xiu C. Tan verfasserin aut Li Wang verfasserin aut Juan Liao verfasserin aut Hong Peng verfasserin aut Ling Lan verfasserin aut Na Yang verfasserin aut Ying Zhao verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Reproductive Health Frontiers Media S.A., 2021 4(2022) (DE-627)1727793331 (DE-600)3035401-8 26733153 nnns volume:4 year:2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2673-3153 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2022 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3389/frph.2022.1032062 doi (DE-627)DOAJ027727386 (DE-599)DOAJ93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH471-489 R5-920 Ying Meng verfasserin aut Which vaginal douching agent is the best choice before oocyte retrieval? A systematic review and network meta-analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate six vaginal douching agents (Iodine, Saline, Iodine followed by saline, chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline, Ozone, Potassium permanganate) on oocytes pick-up related pelvic infection (OPU-PI) and IVF outcome in patients underwent assisted reproduction technology (ART).DesignThrough searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, CINAHL CNKI, only human clinical trials were collected to study the effects of the six vaginal douching agents on OPU-PI and IVF outcomes. The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality by the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and the data analysis software was used to analyze the data accordingly.ResultsThe clinical trials were collected between the earliest available date and June 2022. Eight studies were included, the total sample size used in the study was 12,567. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that Ozone can significantly decrease OPU-PI; Iodine followed by saline can be a antiseptic protocol ranked first without affecting the quality of oocytes and Chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline can improve patients' clinical pregnancy rate.ConclusionBased on Ranking Plot of the Network, this review reports the best evidence available regarding different vaginal douching agents used before OPU. vaginal douching oocyte retrieval pelvic infection IVF outcome network meta analysis Reproduction Medicine (General) Gui H. Wen verfasserin aut Hong Luo verfasserin aut Xiu C. Tan verfasserin aut Li Wang verfasserin aut Juan Liao verfasserin aut Hong Peng verfasserin aut Ling Lan verfasserin aut Na Yang verfasserin aut Ying Zhao verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Reproductive Health Frontiers Media S.A., 2021 4(2022) (DE-627)1727793331 (DE-600)3035401-8 26733153 nnns volume:4 year:2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2673-3153 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2022 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3389/frph.2022.1032062 doi (DE-627)DOAJ027727386 (DE-599)DOAJ93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH471-489 R5-920 Ying Meng verfasserin aut Which vaginal douching agent is the best choice before oocyte retrieval? A systematic review and network meta-analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate six vaginal douching agents (Iodine, Saline, Iodine followed by saline, chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline, Ozone, Potassium permanganate) on oocytes pick-up related pelvic infection (OPU-PI) and IVF outcome in patients underwent assisted reproduction technology (ART).DesignThrough searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, CINAHL CNKI, only human clinical trials were collected to study the effects of the six vaginal douching agents on OPU-PI and IVF outcomes. The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality by the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and the data analysis software was used to analyze the data accordingly.ResultsThe clinical trials were collected between the earliest available date and June 2022. Eight studies were included, the total sample size used in the study was 12,567. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that Ozone can significantly decrease OPU-PI; Iodine followed by saline can be a antiseptic protocol ranked first without affecting the quality of oocytes and Chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline can improve patients' clinical pregnancy rate.ConclusionBased on Ranking Plot of the Network, this review reports the best evidence available regarding different vaginal douching agents used before OPU. vaginal douching oocyte retrieval pelvic infection IVF outcome network meta analysis Reproduction Medicine (General) Gui H. Wen verfasserin aut Hong Luo verfasserin aut Xiu C. Tan verfasserin aut Li Wang verfasserin aut Juan Liao verfasserin aut Hong Peng verfasserin aut Ling Lan verfasserin aut Na Yang verfasserin aut Ying Zhao verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Reproductive Health Frontiers Media S.A., 2021 4(2022) (DE-627)1727793331 (DE-600)3035401-8 26733153 nnns volume:4 year:2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2673-3153 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2022 |
language |
English |
source |
In Frontiers in Reproductive Health 4(2022) volume:4 year:2022 |
sourceStr |
In Frontiers in Reproductive Health 4(2022) volume:4 year:2022 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
vaginal douching oocyte retrieval pelvic infection IVF outcome network meta analysis Reproduction Medicine (General) |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Frontiers in Reproductive Health |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ying Meng @@aut@@ Gui H. Wen @@aut@@ Hong Luo @@aut@@ Xiu C. Tan @@aut@@ Li Wang @@aut@@ Juan Liao @@aut@@ Hong Peng @@aut@@ Ling Lan @@aut@@ Na Yang @@aut@@ Ying Zhao @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1727793331 |
id |
DOAJ027727386 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ027727386</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307120445.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/frph.2022.1032062</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ027727386</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH471-489</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R5-920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ying Meng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Which vaginal douching agent is the best choice before oocyte retrieval? A systematic review and network meta-analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate six vaginal douching agents (Iodine, Saline, Iodine followed by saline, chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline, Ozone, Potassium permanganate) on oocytes pick-up related pelvic infection (OPU-PI) and IVF outcome in patients underwent assisted reproduction technology (ART).DesignThrough searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, CINAHL CNKI, only human clinical trials were collected to study the effects of the six vaginal douching agents on OPU-PI and IVF outcomes. The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality by the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and the data analysis software was used to analyze the data accordingly.ResultsThe clinical trials were collected between the earliest available date and June 2022. Eight studies were included, the total sample size used in the study was 12,567. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that Ozone can significantly decrease OPU-PI; Iodine followed by saline can be a antiseptic protocol ranked first without affecting the quality of oocytes and Chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline can improve patients' clinical pregnancy rate.ConclusionBased on Ranking Plot of the Network, this review reports the best evidence available regarding different vaginal douching agents used before OPU.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">vaginal douching</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">oocyte retrieval</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pelvic infection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">IVF outcome</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">network meta analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Reproduction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gui H. Wen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hong Luo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiu C. Tan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Juan Liao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hong Peng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ling Lan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Na Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ying Zhao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Reproductive Health</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2022)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1727793331</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)3035401-8</subfield><subfield code="x">26733153</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2673-3153</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
Q - Science |
author |
Ying Meng |
spellingShingle |
Ying Meng misc QH471-489 misc R5-920 misc vaginal douching misc oocyte retrieval misc pelvic infection misc IVF outcome misc network meta analysis misc Reproduction misc Medicine (General) Which vaginal douching agent is the best choice before oocyte retrieval? A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
authorStr |
Ying Meng |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1727793331 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
QH471-489 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
26733153 |
topic_title |
QH471-489 R5-920 Which vaginal douching agent is the best choice before oocyte retrieval? A systematic review and network meta-analysis vaginal douching oocyte retrieval pelvic infection IVF outcome network meta analysis |
topic |
misc QH471-489 misc R5-920 misc vaginal douching misc oocyte retrieval misc pelvic infection misc IVF outcome misc network meta analysis misc Reproduction misc Medicine (General) |
topic_unstemmed |
misc QH471-489 misc R5-920 misc vaginal douching misc oocyte retrieval misc pelvic infection misc IVF outcome misc network meta analysis misc Reproduction misc Medicine (General) |
topic_browse |
misc QH471-489 misc R5-920 misc vaginal douching misc oocyte retrieval misc pelvic infection misc IVF outcome misc network meta analysis misc Reproduction misc Medicine (General) |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Frontiers in Reproductive Health |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1727793331 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Frontiers in Reproductive Health |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1727793331 (DE-600)3035401-8 |
title |
Which vaginal douching agent is the best choice before oocyte retrieval? A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ027727386 (DE-599)DOAJ93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc |
title_full |
Which vaginal douching agent is the best choice before oocyte retrieval? A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
author_sort |
Ying Meng |
journal |
Frontiers in Reproductive Health |
journalStr |
Frontiers in Reproductive Health |
callnumber-first-code |
Q |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Ying Meng Gui H. Wen Hong Luo Xiu C. Tan Li Wang Juan Liao Hong Peng Ling Lan Na Yang Ying Zhao |
container_volume |
4 |
class |
QH471-489 R5-920 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Ying Meng |
doi_str_mv |
10.3389/frph.2022.1032062 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
which vaginal douching agent is the best choice before oocyte retrieval? a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
callnumber |
QH471-489 |
title_auth |
Which vaginal douching agent is the best choice before oocyte retrieval? A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
abstract |
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate six vaginal douching agents (Iodine, Saline, Iodine followed by saline, chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline, Ozone, Potassium permanganate) on oocytes pick-up related pelvic infection (OPU-PI) and IVF outcome in patients underwent assisted reproduction technology (ART).DesignThrough searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, CINAHL CNKI, only human clinical trials were collected to study the effects of the six vaginal douching agents on OPU-PI and IVF outcomes. The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality by the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and the data analysis software was used to analyze the data accordingly.ResultsThe clinical trials were collected between the earliest available date and June 2022. Eight studies were included, the total sample size used in the study was 12,567. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that Ozone can significantly decrease OPU-PI; Iodine followed by saline can be a antiseptic protocol ranked first without affecting the quality of oocytes and Chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline can improve patients' clinical pregnancy rate.ConclusionBased on Ranking Plot of the Network, this review reports the best evidence available regarding different vaginal douching agents used before OPU. |
abstractGer |
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate six vaginal douching agents (Iodine, Saline, Iodine followed by saline, chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline, Ozone, Potassium permanganate) on oocytes pick-up related pelvic infection (OPU-PI) and IVF outcome in patients underwent assisted reproduction technology (ART).DesignThrough searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, CINAHL CNKI, only human clinical trials were collected to study the effects of the six vaginal douching agents on OPU-PI and IVF outcomes. The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality by the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and the data analysis software was used to analyze the data accordingly.ResultsThe clinical trials were collected between the earliest available date and June 2022. Eight studies were included, the total sample size used in the study was 12,567. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that Ozone can significantly decrease OPU-PI; Iodine followed by saline can be a antiseptic protocol ranked first without affecting the quality of oocytes and Chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline can improve patients' clinical pregnancy rate.ConclusionBased on Ranking Plot of the Network, this review reports the best evidence available regarding different vaginal douching agents used before OPU. |
abstract_unstemmed |
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate six vaginal douching agents (Iodine, Saline, Iodine followed by saline, chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline, Ozone, Potassium permanganate) on oocytes pick-up related pelvic infection (OPU-PI) and IVF outcome in patients underwent assisted reproduction technology (ART).DesignThrough searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, CINAHL CNKI, only human clinical trials were collected to study the effects of the six vaginal douching agents on OPU-PI and IVF outcomes. The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality by the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and the data analysis software was used to analyze the data accordingly.ResultsThe clinical trials were collected between the earliest available date and June 2022. Eight studies were included, the total sample size used in the study was 12,567. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that Ozone can significantly decrease OPU-PI; Iodine followed by saline can be a antiseptic protocol ranked first without affecting the quality of oocytes and Chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline can improve patients' clinical pregnancy rate.ConclusionBased on Ranking Plot of the Network, this review reports the best evidence available regarding different vaginal douching agents used before OPU. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
title_short |
Which vaginal douching agent is the best choice before oocyte retrieval? A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062 https://doaj.org/article/93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062/full https://doaj.org/toc/2673-3153 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Gui H. Wen Hong Luo Xiu C. Tan Li Wang Juan Liao Hong Peng Ling Lan Na Yang Ying Zhao |
author2Str |
Gui H. Wen Hong Luo Xiu C. Tan Li Wang Juan Liao Hong Peng Ling Lan Na Yang Ying Zhao |
ppnlink |
1727793331 |
callnumber-subject |
QH - Natural History and Biology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3389/frph.2022.1032062 |
callnumber-a |
QH471-489 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T13:43:01.900Z |
_version_ |
1803565590805217280 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ027727386</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307120445.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/frph.2022.1032062</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ027727386</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH471-489</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R5-920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ying Meng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Which vaginal douching agent is the best choice before oocyte retrieval? A systematic review and network meta-analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate six vaginal douching agents (Iodine, Saline, Iodine followed by saline, chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline, Ozone, Potassium permanganate) on oocytes pick-up related pelvic infection (OPU-PI) and IVF outcome in patients underwent assisted reproduction technology (ART).DesignThrough searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, CINAHL CNKI, only human clinical trials were collected to study the effects of the six vaginal douching agents on OPU-PI and IVF outcomes. The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality by the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and the data analysis software was used to analyze the data accordingly.ResultsThe clinical trials were collected between the earliest available date and June 2022. Eight studies were included, the total sample size used in the study was 12,567. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that Ozone can significantly decrease OPU-PI; Iodine followed by saline can be a antiseptic protocol ranked first without affecting the quality of oocytes and Chlorhexidine acetate followed by saline can improve patients' clinical pregnancy rate.ConclusionBased on Ranking Plot of the Network, this review reports the best evidence available regarding different vaginal douching agents used before OPU.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">vaginal douching</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">oocyte retrieval</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pelvic infection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">IVF outcome</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">network meta analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Reproduction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gui H. Wen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hong Luo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiu C. Tan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Juan Liao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hong Peng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ling Lan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Na Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ying Zhao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Reproductive Health</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2022)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1727793331</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)3035401-8</subfield><subfield code="x">26733153</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/93c40a7d430e4093b84deb23053a6dcc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frph.2022.1032062/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2673-3153</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4000654 |