Design and Test of the Structure of Extractor Negative Pressure Zone of Sugarcane Chopper Harvester
Given the problems of the high trash content and loss rate for mechanized sugarcane harvesting, taking the HN4GDL-194 sugarcane chopper harvester extractor developed by South China Agricultural University as the research object, three types of extractor negative pressure structures were designed and...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Jiahui Ren [verfasserIn] Tao Wu [verfasserIn] Qingting Liu [verfasserIn] Xiaoping Zou [verfasserIn] Ke Li [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Agronomy - MDPI AG, 2012, 12(2022), 10, p 2336 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:12 ; year:2022 ; number:10, p 2336 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3390/agronomy12102336 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ028057651 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ028057651 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240414182310.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/agronomy12102336 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ028057651 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 0 | |a Jiahui Ren |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Design and Test of the Structure of Extractor Negative Pressure Zone of Sugarcane Chopper Harvester |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Given the problems of the high trash content and loss rate for mechanized sugarcane harvesting, taking the HN4GDL-194 sugarcane chopper harvester extractor developed by South China Agricultural University as the research object, three types of extractor negative pressure structures were designed and internal flow field simulation analysis was conducted. Simulation results showed that the aerodynamic performance of the flow field in the negative pressure area of the extractor negative pressure structure two is the best and the wind velocity and negative pressure are the largest. The measurement results of wind velocity, wind pressure, and flow showed that the changing trend in the actual value of wind velocity and wind pressure is basically consistent with the simulation value. The relative error between the actual flow of the air outlet and the simulation value is less than 10% under different speeds, indicating that the simulation has high accuracy. Field tests of the original extractor and the optimal extractor were conducted. The test results for the trash content showed that when the feeding rate was 1.5 kg/s, there was no significant difference in the trash content between the optimal extractor and the original extractor under various fan speeds. When the feeding rate increased to 7.5 kg/s and the fan speed was low (950 r/min) and medium (1100 r/min), the trash content of the optimal extractor was significantly lower than that of the original extractor, decreasing 2.5% and 1.63%, respectively. The loss rate test results showed that when the fan speed is low and high (1250 r/min), there is no significant difference between the loss rate of the optimal extractor and the original extractor. When the fan speed was 1100 r/min and the feeding rate was 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 kg/s, compared with the original extractor, the loss rate of the optimal extractor decreased by 0.53%, 0.21%, and 0.19%, respectively. | ||
650 | 4 | |a sugarcane harvester | |
650 | 4 | |a extractor | |
650 | 4 | |a negative pressure structure | |
650 | 4 | |a CFD | |
650 | 4 | |a trash content | |
650 | 4 | |a loss rate | |
653 | 0 | |a Agriculture | |
653 | 0 | |a S | |
700 | 0 | |a Tao Wu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Qingting Liu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Xiaoping Zou |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Ke Li |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Agronomy |d MDPI AG, 2012 |g 12(2022), 10, p 2336 |w (DE-627)658000543 |w (DE-600)2607043-1 |x 20734395 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2022 |g number:10, p 2336 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102336 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/10/2336 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 12 |j 2022 |e 10, p 2336 |
author_variant |
j r jr t w tw q l ql x z xz k l kl |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:20734395:2022----::einntsotetutroetatreaiersueoefu |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.3390/agronomy12102336 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028057651 (DE-599)DOAJ0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jiahui Ren verfasserin aut Design and Test of the Structure of Extractor Negative Pressure Zone of Sugarcane Chopper Harvester 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Given the problems of the high trash content and loss rate for mechanized sugarcane harvesting, taking the HN4GDL-194 sugarcane chopper harvester extractor developed by South China Agricultural University as the research object, three types of extractor negative pressure structures were designed and internal flow field simulation analysis was conducted. Simulation results showed that the aerodynamic performance of the flow field in the negative pressure area of the extractor negative pressure structure two is the best and the wind velocity and negative pressure are the largest. The measurement results of wind velocity, wind pressure, and flow showed that the changing trend in the actual value of wind velocity and wind pressure is basically consistent with the simulation value. The relative error between the actual flow of the air outlet and the simulation value is less than 10% under different speeds, indicating that the simulation has high accuracy. Field tests of the original extractor and the optimal extractor were conducted. The test results for the trash content showed that when the feeding rate was 1.5 kg/s, there was no significant difference in the trash content between the optimal extractor and the original extractor under various fan speeds. When the feeding rate increased to 7.5 kg/s and the fan speed was low (950 r/min) and medium (1100 r/min), the trash content of the optimal extractor was significantly lower than that of the original extractor, decreasing 2.5% and 1.63%, respectively. The loss rate test results showed that when the fan speed is low and high (1250 r/min), there is no significant difference between the loss rate of the optimal extractor and the original extractor. When the fan speed was 1100 r/min and the feeding rate was 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 kg/s, compared with the original extractor, the loss rate of the optimal extractor decreased by 0.53%, 0.21%, and 0.19%, respectively. sugarcane harvester extractor negative pressure structure CFD trash content loss rate Agriculture S Tao Wu verfasserin aut Qingting Liu verfasserin aut Xiaoping Zou verfasserin aut Ke Li verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 12(2022), 10, p 2336 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:12 year:2022 number:10, p 2336 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102336 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/10/2336 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2022 10, p 2336 |
spelling |
10.3390/agronomy12102336 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028057651 (DE-599)DOAJ0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jiahui Ren verfasserin aut Design and Test of the Structure of Extractor Negative Pressure Zone of Sugarcane Chopper Harvester 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Given the problems of the high trash content and loss rate for mechanized sugarcane harvesting, taking the HN4GDL-194 sugarcane chopper harvester extractor developed by South China Agricultural University as the research object, three types of extractor negative pressure structures were designed and internal flow field simulation analysis was conducted. Simulation results showed that the aerodynamic performance of the flow field in the negative pressure area of the extractor negative pressure structure two is the best and the wind velocity and negative pressure are the largest. The measurement results of wind velocity, wind pressure, and flow showed that the changing trend in the actual value of wind velocity and wind pressure is basically consistent with the simulation value. The relative error between the actual flow of the air outlet and the simulation value is less than 10% under different speeds, indicating that the simulation has high accuracy. Field tests of the original extractor and the optimal extractor were conducted. The test results for the trash content showed that when the feeding rate was 1.5 kg/s, there was no significant difference in the trash content between the optimal extractor and the original extractor under various fan speeds. When the feeding rate increased to 7.5 kg/s and the fan speed was low (950 r/min) and medium (1100 r/min), the trash content of the optimal extractor was significantly lower than that of the original extractor, decreasing 2.5% and 1.63%, respectively. The loss rate test results showed that when the fan speed is low and high (1250 r/min), there is no significant difference between the loss rate of the optimal extractor and the original extractor. When the fan speed was 1100 r/min and the feeding rate was 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 kg/s, compared with the original extractor, the loss rate of the optimal extractor decreased by 0.53%, 0.21%, and 0.19%, respectively. sugarcane harvester extractor negative pressure structure CFD trash content loss rate Agriculture S Tao Wu verfasserin aut Qingting Liu verfasserin aut Xiaoping Zou verfasserin aut Ke Li verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 12(2022), 10, p 2336 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:12 year:2022 number:10, p 2336 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102336 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/10/2336 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2022 10, p 2336 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3390/agronomy12102336 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028057651 (DE-599)DOAJ0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jiahui Ren verfasserin aut Design and Test of the Structure of Extractor Negative Pressure Zone of Sugarcane Chopper Harvester 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Given the problems of the high trash content and loss rate for mechanized sugarcane harvesting, taking the HN4GDL-194 sugarcane chopper harvester extractor developed by South China Agricultural University as the research object, three types of extractor negative pressure structures were designed and internal flow field simulation analysis was conducted. Simulation results showed that the aerodynamic performance of the flow field in the negative pressure area of the extractor negative pressure structure two is the best and the wind velocity and negative pressure are the largest. The measurement results of wind velocity, wind pressure, and flow showed that the changing trend in the actual value of wind velocity and wind pressure is basically consistent with the simulation value. The relative error between the actual flow of the air outlet and the simulation value is less than 10% under different speeds, indicating that the simulation has high accuracy. Field tests of the original extractor and the optimal extractor were conducted. The test results for the trash content showed that when the feeding rate was 1.5 kg/s, there was no significant difference in the trash content between the optimal extractor and the original extractor under various fan speeds. When the feeding rate increased to 7.5 kg/s and the fan speed was low (950 r/min) and medium (1100 r/min), the trash content of the optimal extractor was significantly lower than that of the original extractor, decreasing 2.5% and 1.63%, respectively. The loss rate test results showed that when the fan speed is low and high (1250 r/min), there is no significant difference between the loss rate of the optimal extractor and the original extractor. When the fan speed was 1100 r/min and the feeding rate was 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 kg/s, compared with the original extractor, the loss rate of the optimal extractor decreased by 0.53%, 0.21%, and 0.19%, respectively. sugarcane harvester extractor negative pressure structure CFD trash content loss rate Agriculture S Tao Wu verfasserin aut Qingting Liu verfasserin aut Xiaoping Zou verfasserin aut Ke Li verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 12(2022), 10, p 2336 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:12 year:2022 number:10, p 2336 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102336 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/10/2336 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2022 10, p 2336 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3390/agronomy12102336 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028057651 (DE-599)DOAJ0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jiahui Ren verfasserin aut Design and Test of the Structure of Extractor Negative Pressure Zone of Sugarcane Chopper Harvester 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Given the problems of the high trash content and loss rate for mechanized sugarcane harvesting, taking the HN4GDL-194 sugarcane chopper harvester extractor developed by South China Agricultural University as the research object, three types of extractor negative pressure structures were designed and internal flow field simulation analysis was conducted. Simulation results showed that the aerodynamic performance of the flow field in the negative pressure area of the extractor negative pressure structure two is the best and the wind velocity and negative pressure are the largest. The measurement results of wind velocity, wind pressure, and flow showed that the changing trend in the actual value of wind velocity and wind pressure is basically consistent with the simulation value. The relative error between the actual flow of the air outlet and the simulation value is less than 10% under different speeds, indicating that the simulation has high accuracy. Field tests of the original extractor and the optimal extractor were conducted. The test results for the trash content showed that when the feeding rate was 1.5 kg/s, there was no significant difference in the trash content between the optimal extractor and the original extractor under various fan speeds. When the feeding rate increased to 7.5 kg/s and the fan speed was low (950 r/min) and medium (1100 r/min), the trash content of the optimal extractor was significantly lower than that of the original extractor, decreasing 2.5% and 1.63%, respectively. The loss rate test results showed that when the fan speed is low and high (1250 r/min), there is no significant difference between the loss rate of the optimal extractor and the original extractor. When the fan speed was 1100 r/min and the feeding rate was 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 kg/s, compared with the original extractor, the loss rate of the optimal extractor decreased by 0.53%, 0.21%, and 0.19%, respectively. sugarcane harvester extractor negative pressure structure CFD trash content loss rate Agriculture S Tao Wu verfasserin aut Qingting Liu verfasserin aut Xiaoping Zou verfasserin aut Ke Li verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 12(2022), 10, p 2336 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:12 year:2022 number:10, p 2336 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102336 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/10/2336 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2022 10, p 2336 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3390/agronomy12102336 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028057651 (DE-599)DOAJ0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jiahui Ren verfasserin aut Design and Test of the Structure of Extractor Negative Pressure Zone of Sugarcane Chopper Harvester 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Given the problems of the high trash content and loss rate for mechanized sugarcane harvesting, taking the HN4GDL-194 sugarcane chopper harvester extractor developed by South China Agricultural University as the research object, three types of extractor negative pressure structures were designed and internal flow field simulation analysis was conducted. Simulation results showed that the aerodynamic performance of the flow field in the negative pressure area of the extractor negative pressure structure two is the best and the wind velocity and negative pressure are the largest. The measurement results of wind velocity, wind pressure, and flow showed that the changing trend in the actual value of wind velocity and wind pressure is basically consistent with the simulation value. The relative error between the actual flow of the air outlet and the simulation value is less than 10% under different speeds, indicating that the simulation has high accuracy. Field tests of the original extractor and the optimal extractor were conducted. The test results for the trash content showed that when the feeding rate was 1.5 kg/s, there was no significant difference in the trash content between the optimal extractor and the original extractor under various fan speeds. When the feeding rate increased to 7.5 kg/s and the fan speed was low (950 r/min) and medium (1100 r/min), the trash content of the optimal extractor was significantly lower than that of the original extractor, decreasing 2.5% and 1.63%, respectively. The loss rate test results showed that when the fan speed is low and high (1250 r/min), there is no significant difference between the loss rate of the optimal extractor and the original extractor. When the fan speed was 1100 r/min and the feeding rate was 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 kg/s, compared with the original extractor, the loss rate of the optimal extractor decreased by 0.53%, 0.21%, and 0.19%, respectively. sugarcane harvester extractor negative pressure structure CFD trash content loss rate Agriculture S Tao Wu verfasserin aut Qingting Liu verfasserin aut Xiaoping Zou verfasserin aut Ke Li verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 12(2022), 10, p 2336 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:12 year:2022 number:10, p 2336 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102336 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/10/2336 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2022 10, p 2336 |
language |
English |
source |
In Agronomy 12(2022), 10, p 2336 volume:12 year:2022 number:10, p 2336 |
sourceStr |
In Agronomy 12(2022), 10, p 2336 volume:12 year:2022 number:10, p 2336 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
sugarcane harvester extractor negative pressure structure CFD trash content loss rate Agriculture S |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Agronomy |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jiahui Ren @@aut@@ Tao Wu @@aut@@ Qingting Liu @@aut@@ Xiaoping Zou @@aut@@ Ke Li @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
658000543 |
id |
DOAJ028057651 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ028057651</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414182310.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/agronomy12102336</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ028057651</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jiahui Ren</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Design and Test of the Structure of Extractor Negative Pressure Zone of Sugarcane Chopper Harvester</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Given the problems of the high trash content and loss rate for mechanized sugarcane harvesting, taking the HN4GDL-194 sugarcane chopper harvester extractor developed by South China Agricultural University as the research object, three types of extractor negative pressure structures were designed and internal flow field simulation analysis was conducted. Simulation results showed that the aerodynamic performance of the flow field in the negative pressure area of the extractor negative pressure structure two is the best and the wind velocity and negative pressure are the largest. The measurement results of wind velocity, wind pressure, and flow showed that the changing trend in the actual value of wind velocity and wind pressure is basically consistent with the simulation value. The relative error between the actual flow of the air outlet and the simulation value is less than 10% under different speeds, indicating that the simulation has high accuracy. Field tests of the original extractor and the optimal extractor were conducted. The test results for the trash content showed that when the feeding rate was 1.5 kg/s, there was no significant difference in the trash content between the optimal extractor and the original extractor under various fan speeds. When the feeding rate increased to 7.5 kg/s and the fan speed was low (950 r/min) and medium (1100 r/min), the trash content of the optimal extractor was significantly lower than that of the original extractor, decreasing 2.5% and 1.63%, respectively. The loss rate test results showed that when the fan speed is low and high (1250 r/min), there is no significant difference between the loss rate of the optimal extractor and the original extractor. When the fan speed was 1100 r/min and the feeding rate was 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 kg/s, compared with the original extractor, the loss rate of the optimal extractor decreased by 0.53%, 0.21%, and 0.19%, respectively.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sugarcane harvester</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">extractor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">negative pressure structure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">trash content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">loss rate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tao Wu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Qingting Liu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiaoping Zou</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ke Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Agronomy</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2022), 10, p 2336</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)658000543</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2607043-1</subfield><subfield code="x">20734395</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:10, p 2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102336</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/10/2336</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">10, p 2336</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Jiahui Ren |
spellingShingle |
Jiahui Ren misc sugarcane harvester misc extractor misc negative pressure structure misc CFD misc trash content misc loss rate misc Agriculture misc S Design and Test of the Structure of Extractor Negative Pressure Zone of Sugarcane Chopper Harvester |
authorStr |
Jiahui Ren |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)658000543 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
20734395 |
topic_title |
Design and Test of the Structure of Extractor Negative Pressure Zone of Sugarcane Chopper Harvester sugarcane harvester extractor negative pressure structure CFD trash content loss rate |
topic |
misc sugarcane harvester misc extractor misc negative pressure structure misc CFD misc trash content misc loss rate misc Agriculture misc S |
topic_unstemmed |
misc sugarcane harvester misc extractor misc negative pressure structure misc CFD misc trash content misc loss rate misc Agriculture misc S |
topic_browse |
misc sugarcane harvester misc extractor misc negative pressure structure misc CFD misc trash content misc loss rate misc Agriculture misc S |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Agronomy |
hierarchy_parent_id |
658000543 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Agronomy |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 |
title |
Design and Test of the Structure of Extractor Negative Pressure Zone of Sugarcane Chopper Harvester |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ028057651 (DE-599)DOAJ0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66 |
title_full |
Design and Test of the Structure of Extractor Negative Pressure Zone of Sugarcane Chopper Harvester |
author_sort |
Jiahui Ren |
journal |
Agronomy |
journalStr |
Agronomy |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Jiahui Ren Tao Wu Qingting Liu Xiaoping Zou Ke Li |
container_volume |
12 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Jiahui Ren |
doi_str_mv |
10.3390/agronomy12102336 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
design and test of the structure of extractor negative pressure zone of sugarcane chopper harvester |
title_auth |
Design and Test of the Structure of Extractor Negative Pressure Zone of Sugarcane Chopper Harvester |
abstract |
Given the problems of the high trash content and loss rate for mechanized sugarcane harvesting, taking the HN4GDL-194 sugarcane chopper harvester extractor developed by South China Agricultural University as the research object, three types of extractor negative pressure structures were designed and internal flow field simulation analysis was conducted. Simulation results showed that the aerodynamic performance of the flow field in the negative pressure area of the extractor negative pressure structure two is the best and the wind velocity and negative pressure are the largest. The measurement results of wind velocity, wind pressure, and flow showed that the changing trend in the actual value of wind velocity and wind pressure is basically consistent with the simulation value. The relative error between the actual flow of the air outlet and the simulation value is less than 10% under different speeds, indicating that the simulation has high accuracy. Field tests of the original extractor and the optimal extractor were conducted. The test results for the trash content showed that when the feeding rate was 1.5 kg/s, there was no significant difference in the trash content between the optimal extractor and the original extractor under various fan speeds. When the feeding rate increased to 7.5 kg/s and the fan speed was low (950 r/min) and medium (1100 r/min), the trash content of the optimal extractor was significantly lower than that of the original extractor, decreasing 2.5% and 1.63%, respectively. The loss rate test results showed that when the fan speed is low and high (1250 r/min), there is no significant difference between the loss rate of the optimal extractor and the original extractor. When the fan speed was 1100 r/min and the feeding rate was 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 kg/s, compared with the original extractor, the loss rate of the optimal extractor decreased by 0.53%, 0.21%, and 0.19%, respectively. |
abstractGer |
Given the problems of the high trash content and loss rate for mechanized sugarcane harvesting, taking the HN4GDL-194 sugarcane chopper harvester extractor developed by South China Agricultural University as the research object, three types of extractor negative pressure structures were designed and internal flow field simulation analysis was conducted. Simulation results showed that the aerodynamic performance of the flow field in the negative pressure area of the extractor negative pressure structure two is the best and the wind velocity and negative pressure are the largest. The measurement results of wind velocity, wind pressure, and flow showed that the changing trend in the actual value of wind velocity and wind pressure is basically consistent with the simulation value. The relative error between the actual flow of the air outlet and the simulation value is less than 10% under different speeds, indicating that the simulation has high accuracy. Field tests of the original extractor and the optimal extractor were conducted. The test results for the trash content showed that when the feeding rate was 1.5 kg/s, there was no significant difference in the trash content between the optimal extractor and the original extractor under various fan speeds. When the feeding rate increased to 7.5 kg/s and the fan speed was low (950 r/min) and medium (1100 r/min), the trash content of the optimal extractor was significantly lower than that of the original extractor, decreasing 2.5% and 1.63%, respectively. The loss rate test results showed that when the fan speed is low and high (1250 r/min), there is no significant difference between the loss rate of the optimal extractor and the original extractor. When the fan speed was 1100 r/min and the feeding rate was 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 kg/s, compared with the original extractor, the loss rate of the optimal extractor decreased by 0.53%, 0.21%, and 0.19%, respectively. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Given the problems of the high trash content and loss rate for mechanized sugarcane harvesting, taking the HN4GDL-194 sugarcane chopper harvester extractor developed by South China Agricultural University as the research object, three types of extractor negative pressure structures were designed and internal flow field simulation analysis was conducted. Simulation results showed that the aerodynamic performance of the flow field in the negative pressure area of the extractor negative pressure structure two is the best and the wind velocity and negative pressure are the largest. The measurement results of wind velocity, wind pressure, and flow showed that the changing trend in the actual value of wind velocity and wind pressure is basically consistent with the simulation value. The relative error between the actual flow of the air outlet and the simulation value is less than 10% under different speeds, indicating that the simulation has high accuracy. Field tests of the original extractor and the optimal extractor were conducted. The test results for the trash content showed that when the feeding rate was 1.5 kg/s, there was no significant difference in the trash content between the optimal extractor and the original extractor under various fan speeds. When the feeding rate increased to 7.5 kg/s and the fan speed was low (950 r/min) and medium (1100 r/min), the trash content of the optimal extractor was significantly lower than that of the original extractor, decreasing 2.5% and 1.63%, respectively. The loss rate test results showed that when the fan speed is low and high (1250 r/min), there is no significant difference between the loss rate of the optimal extractor and the original extractor. When the fan speed was 1100 r/min and the feeding rate was 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 kg/s, compared with the original extractor, the loss rate of the optimal extractor decreased by 0.53%, 0.21%, and 0.19%, respectively. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
10, p 2336 |
title_short |
Design and Test of the Structure of Extractor Negative Pressure Zone of Sugarcane Chopper Harvester |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102336 https://doaj.org/article/0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66 https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/10/2336 https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Tao Wu Qingting Liu Xiaoping Zou Ke Li |
author2Str |
Tao Wu Qingting Liu Xiaoping Zou Ke Li |
ppnlink |
658000543 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3390/agronomy12102336 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T15:30:07.068Z |
_version_ |
1803572328080080896 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ028057651</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414182310.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/agronomy12102336</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ028057651</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jiahui Ren</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Design and Test of the Structure of Extractor Negative Pressure Zone of Sugarcane Chopper Harvester</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Given the problems of the high trash content and loss rate for mechanized sugarcane harvesting, taking the HN4GDL-194 sugarcane chopper harvester extractor developed by South China Agricultural University as the research object, three types of extractor negative pressure structures were designed and internal flow field simulation analysis was conducted. Simulation results showed that the aerodynamic performance of the flow field in the negative pressure area of the extractor negative pressure structure two is the best and the wind velocity and negative pressure are the largest. The measurement results of wind velocity, wind pressure, and flow showed that the changing trend in the actual value of wind velocity and wind pressure is basically consistent with the simulation value. The relative error between the actual flow of the air outlet and the simulation value is less than 10% under different speeds, indicating that the simulation has high accuracy. Field tests of the original extractor and the optimal extractor were conducted. The test results for the trash content showed that when the feeding rate was 1.5 kg/s, there was no significant difference in the trash content between the optimal extractor and the original extractor under various fan speeds. When the feeding rate increased to 7.5 kg/s and the fan speed was low (950 r/min) and medium (1100 r/min), the trash content of the optimal extractor was significantly lower than that of the original extractor, decreasing 2.5% and 1.63%, respectively. The loss rate test results showed that when the fan speed is low and high (1250 r/min), there is no significant difference between the loss rate of the optimal extractor and the original extractor. When the fan speed was 1100 r/min and the feeding rate was 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 kg/s, compared with the original extractor, the loss rate of the optimal extractor decreased by 0.53%, 0.21%, and 0.19%, respectively.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sugarcane harvester</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">extractor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">negative pressure structure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">trash content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">loss rate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tao Wu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Qingting Liu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiaoping Zou</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ke Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Agronomy</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2022), 10, p 2336</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)658000543</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2607043-1</subfield><subfield code="x">20734395</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:10, p 2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102336</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/0676288ba5c34d40b20d3e0b02fecf66</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/10/2336</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">10, p 2336</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3998737 |