An Empirical Study on Software Test Effort Estimation for Defense Projects

Effort estimation of software testing plays a vital role in the effective completion of testing. In particular, software test effort estimation in defense projects is not an easy and simple phenomenon, owing to internal and external factors. This study aims to investigate the relationships between s...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Esra Cibir [verfasserIn] Tulin Ercelebi Ayyildiz [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	Software engineering software measurement software metrics software quality software testing

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: IEEE Access - IEEE, 2014, 10(2022), Seite 48082-48087
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:10 ; year:2022 ; pages:48082-48087

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ028059263

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ028059263
003	DE-627
005	20230307122857.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ028059263
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJbf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a TK1-9971
100	0		\|a Esra Cibir \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	3	\|a An Empirical Study on Software Test Effort Estimation for Defense Projects
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Effort estimation of software testing plays a vital role in the effective completion of testing. In particular, software test effort estimation in defense projects is not an easy and simple phenomenon, owing to internal and external factors. This study aims to investigate the relationships between software test metrics used in the industry and software testing efforts. A method for estimating the testing effort is proposed using a novel set of software testing metrics that have not been used in any previously proposed software test effort estimation methods. In this study, 15 completed software projects of a CMMI Level-3 certified defense industry company were analyzed. The results of the empirical study show that the proposed method with the given metrics provides acceptable prediction quality, with Pred (0.25) and Pred (0.30) values equal to 0.867. We obtained plausible results and demonstrated that our newly proposed metrics can be safely used for software test effort estimation.
650		4	\|a Software engineering
650		4	\|a software measurement
650		4	\|a software metrics
650		4	\|a software quality
650		4	\|a software testing
653		0	\|a Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
700	0		\|a Tulin Ercelebi Ayyildiz \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t IEEE Access \|d IEEE, 2014 \|g 10(2022), Seite 48082-48087 \|w (DE-627)728440385 \|w (DE-600)2687964-5 \|x 21693536 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:10 \|g year:2022 \|g pages:48082-48087
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/bf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9766342/ \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 10 \|j 2022 \|h 48082-48087

Indexfelder

author_variant	e c ec t e a tea
matchkey_str	article:21693536:2022----::nmiiasuynotaeetfotsiaino
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
callnumber-subject-code	TK
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028059263 (DE-599)DOAJbf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK1-9971 Esra Cibir verfasserin aut An Empirical Study on Software Test Effort Estimation for Defense Projects 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Effort estimation of software testing plays a vital role in the effective completion of testing. In particular, software test effort estimation in defense projects is not an easy and simple phenomenon, owing to internal and external factors. This study aims to investigate the relationships between software test metrics used in the industry and software testing efforts. A method for estimating the testing effort is proposed using a novel set of software testing metrics that have not been used in any previously proposed software test effort estimation methods. In this study, 15 completed software projects of a CMMI Level-3 certified defense industry company were analyzed. The results of the empirical study show that the proposed method with the given metrics provides acceptable prediction quality, with Pred (0.25) and Pred (0.30) values equal to 0.867. We obtained plausible results and demonstrated that our newly proposed metrics can be safely used for software test effort estimation. Software engineering software measurement software metrics software quality software testing Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Tulin Ercelebi Ayyildiz verfasserin aut In IEEE Access IEEE, 2014 10(2022), Seite 48082-48087 (DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5 21693536 nnns volume:10 year:2022 pages:48082-48087 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87 kostenfrei https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9766342/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2022 48082-48087
spelling	10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028059263 (DE-599)DOAJbf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK1-9971 Esra Cibir verfasserin aut An Empirical Study on Software Test Effort Estimation for Defense Projects 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Effort estimation of software testing plays a vital role in the effective completion of testing. In particular, software test effort estimation in defense projects is not an easy and simple phenomenon, owing to internal and external factors. This study aims to investigate the relationships between software test metrics used in the industry and software testing efforts. A method for estimating the testing effort is proposed using a novel set of software testing metrics that have not been used in any previously proposed software test effort estimation methods. In this study, 15 completed software projects of a CMMI Level-3 certified defense industry company were analyzed. The results of the empirical study show that the proposed method with the given metrics provides acceptable prediction quality, with Pred (0.25) and Pred (0.30) values equal to 0.867. We obtained plausible results and demonstrated that our newly proposed metrics can be safely used for software test effort estimation. Software engineering software measurement software metrics software quality software testing Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Tulin Ercelebi Ayyildiz verfasserin aut In IEEE Access IEEE, 2014 10(2022), Seite 48082-48087 (DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5 21693536 nnns volume:10 year:2022 pages:48082-48087 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87 kostenfrei https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9766342/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2022 48082-48087
allfields_unstemmed	10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028059263 (DE-599)DOAJbf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK1-9971 Esra Cibir verfasserin aut An Empirical Study on Software Test Effort Estimation for Defense Projects 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Effort estimation of software testing plays a vital role in the effective completion of testing. In particular, software test effort estimation in defense projects is not an easy and simple phenomenon, owing to internal and external factors. This study aims to investigate the relationships between software test metrics used in the industry and software testing efforts. A method for estimating the testing effort is proposed using a novel set of software testing metrics that have not been used in any previously proposed software test effort estimation methods. In this study, 15 completed software projects of a CMMI Level-3 certified defense industry company were analyzed. The results of the empirical study show that the proposed method with the given metrics provides acceptable prediction quality, with Pred (0.25) and Pred (0.30) values equal to 0.867. We obtained plausible results and demonstrated that our newly proposed metrics can be safely used for software test effort estimation. Software engineering software measurement software metrics software quality software testing Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Tulin Ercelebi Ayyildiz verfasserin aut In IEEE Access IEEE, 2014 10(2022), Seite 48082-48087 (DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5 21693536 nnns volume:10 year:2022 pages:48082-48087 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87 kostenfrei https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9766342/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2022 48082-48087
allfieldsGer	10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028059263 (DE-599)DOAJbf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK1-9971 Esra Cibir verfasserin aut An Empirical Study on Software Test Effort Estimation for Defense Projects 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Effort estimation of software testing plays a vital role in the effective completion of testing. In particular, software test effort estimation in defense projects is not an easy and simple phenomenon, owing to internal and external factors. This study aims to investigate the relationships between software test metrics used in the industry and software testing efforts. A method for estimating the testing effort is proposed using a novel set of software testing metrics that have not been used in any previously proposed software test effort estimation methods. In this study, 15 completed software projects of a CMMI Level-3 certified defense industry company were analyzed. The results of the empirical study show that the proposed method with the given metrics provides acceptable prediction quality, with Pred (0.25) and Pred (0.30) values equal to 0.867. We obtained plausible results and demonstrated that our newly proposed metrics can be safely used for software test effort estimation. Software engineering software measurement software metrics software quality software testing Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Tulin Ercelebi Ayyildiz verfasserin aut In IEEE Access IEEE, 2014 10(2022), Seite 48082-48087 (DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5 21693536 nnns volume:10 year:2022 pages:48082-48087 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87 kostenfrei https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9766342/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2022 48082-48087
allfieldsSound	10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028059263 (DE-599)DOAJbf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK1-9971 Esra Cibir verfasserin aut An Empirical Study on Software Test Effort Estimation for Defense Projects 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Effort estimation of software testing plays a vital role in the effective completion of testing. In particular, software test effort estimation in defense projects is not an easy and simple phenomenon, owing to internal and external factors. This study aims to investigate the relationships between software test metrics used in the industry and software testing efforts. A method for estimating the testing effort is proposed using a novel set of software testing metrics that have not been used in any previously proposed software test effort estimation methods. In this study, 15 completed software projects of a CMMI Level-3 certified defense industry company were analyzed. The results of the empirical study show that the proposed method with the given metrics provides acceptable prediction quality, with Pred (0.25) and Pred (0.30) values equal to 0.867. We obtained plausible results and demonstrated that our newly proposed metrics can be safely used for software test effort estimation. Software engineering software measurement software metrics software quality software testing Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Tulin Ercelebi Ayyildiz verfasserin aut In IEEE Access IEEE, 2014 10(2022), Seite 48082-48087 (DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5 21693536 nnns volume:10 year:2022 pages:48082-48087 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87 kostenfrei https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9766342/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2022 48082-48087
language	English
source	In IEEE Access 10(2022), Seite 48082-48087 volume:10 year:2022 pages:48082-48087
sourceStr	In IEEE Access 10(2022), Seite 48082-48087 volume:10 year:2022 pages:48082-48087
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Software engineering software measurement software metrics software quality software testing Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	IEEE Access
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Esra Cibir @@aut@@ Tulin Ercelebi Ayyildiz @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	728440385
id	DOAJ028059263
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ028059263</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307122857.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ028059263</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJbf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TK1-9971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Esra Cibir</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">An Empirical Study on Software Test Effort Estimation for Defense Projects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Effort estimation of software testing plays a vital role in the effective completion of testing. In particular, software test effort estimation in defense projects is not an easy and simple phenomenon, owing to internal and external factors. This study aims to investigate the relationships between software test metrics used in the industry and software testing efforts. A method for estimating the testing effort is proposed using a novel set of software testing metrics that have not been used in any previously proposed software test effort estimation methods. In this study, 15 completed software projects of a CMMI Level-3 certified defense industry company were analyzed. The results of the empirical study show that the proposed method with the given metrics provides acceptable prediction quality, with Pred (0.25) and Pred (0.30) values equal to 0.867. We obtained plausible results and demonstrated that our newly proposed metrics can be safely used for software test effort estimation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Software engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">software measurement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">software metrics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">software quality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">software testing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tulin Ercelebi Ayyildiz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">IEEE Access</subfield><subfield code="d">IEEE, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2022), Seite 48082-48087</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)728440385</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2687964-5</subfield><subfield code="x">21693536</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:48082-48087</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/bf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9766342/</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">48082-48087</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	T - Technology
author	Esra Cibir
spellingShingle	Esra Cibir misc TK1-9971 misc Software engineering misc software measurement misc software metrics misc software quality misc software testing misc Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering An Empirical Study on Software Test Effort Estimation for Defense Projects
authorStr	Esra Cibir
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)728440385
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	TK1-9971
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	21693536
topic_title	TK1-9971 An Empirical Study on Software Test Effort Estimation for Defense Projects Software engineering software measurement software metrics software quality software testing
topic	misc TK1-9971 misc Software engineering misc software measurement misc software metrics misc software quality misc software testing misc Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
topic_unstemmed	misc TK1-9971 misc Software engineering misc software measurement misc software metrics misc software quality misc software testing misc Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
topic_browse	misc TK1-9971 misc Software engineering misc software measurement misc software metrics misc software quality misc software testing misc Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	IEEE Access
hierarchy_parent_id	728440385
hierarchy_top_title	IEEE Access
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5
title	An Empirical Study on Software Test Effort Estimation for Defense Projects
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ028059263 (DE-599)DOAJbf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87
title_full	An Empirical Study on Software Test Effort Estimation for Defense Projects
author_sort	Esra Cibir
journal	IEEE Access
journalStr	IEEE Access
callnumber-first-code	T
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	48082
author_browse	Esra Cibir Tulin Ercelebi Ayyildiz
container_volume	10
class	TK1-9971
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Esra Cibir
doi_str_mv	10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	empirical study on software test effort estimation for defense projects
callnumber	TK1-9971
title_auth	An Empirical Study on Software Test Effort Estimation for Defense Projects
abstract	Effort estimation of software testing plays a vital role in the effective completion of testing. In particular, software test effort estimation in defense projects is not an easy and simple phenomenon, owing to internal and external factors. This study aims to investigate the relationships between software test metrics used in the industry and software testing efforts. A method for estimating the testing effort is proposed using a novel set of software testing metrics that have not been used in any previously proposed software test effort estimation methods. In this study, 15 completed software projects of a CMMI Level-3 certified defense industry company were analyzed. The results of the empirical study show that the proposed method with the given metrics provides acceptable prediction quality, with Pred (0.25) and Pred (0.30) values equal to 0.867. We obtained plausible results and demonstrated that our newly proposed metrics can be safely used for software test effort estimation.
abstractGer	Effort estimation of software testing plays a vital role in the effective completion of testing. In particular, software test effort estimation in defense projects is not an easy and simple phenomenon, owing to internal and external factors. This study aims to investigate the relationships between software test metrics used in the industry and software testing efforts. A method for estimating the testing effort is proposed using a novel set of software testing metrics that have not been used in any previously proposed software test effort estimation methods. In this study, 15 completed software projects of a CMMI Level-3 certified defense industry company were analyzed. The results of the empirical study show that the proposed method with the given metrics provides acceptable prediction quality, with Pred (0.25) and Pred (0.30) values equal to 0.867. We obtained plausible results and demonstrated that our newly proposed metrics can be safely used for software test effort estimation.
abstract_unstemmed	Effort estimation of software testing plays a vital role in the effective completion of testing. In particular, software test effort estimation in defense projects is not an easy and simple phenomenon, owing to internal and external factors. This study aims to investigate the relationships between software test metrics used in the industry and software testing efforts. A method for estimating the testing effort is proposed using a novel set of software testing metrics that have not been used in any previously proposed software test effort estimation methods. In this study, 15 completed software projects of a CMMI Level-3 certified defense industry company were analyzed. The results of the empirical study show that the proposed method with the given metrics provides acceptable prediction quality, with Pred (0.25) and Pred (0.30) values equal to 0.867. We obtained plausible results and demonstrated that our newly proposed metrics can be safely used for software test effort estimation.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	An Empirical Study on Software Test Effort Estimation for Defense Projects
url	https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326 https://doaj.org/article/bf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9766342/ https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536
remote_bool	true
author2	Tulin Ercelebi Ayyildiz
author2Str	Tulin Ercelebi Ayyildiz
ppnlink	728440385
callnumber-subject	TK - Electrical and Nuclear Engineering
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326
callnumber-a	TK1-9971
up_date	2024-07-03T15:30:35.846Z
_version_	1803572358258098176
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ028059263</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307122857.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ028059263</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJbf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TK1-9971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Esra Cibir</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">An Empirical Study on Software Test Effort Estimation for Defense Projects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Effort estimation of software testing plays a vital role in the effective completion of testing. In particular, software test effort estimation in defense projects is not an easy and simple phenomenon, owing to internal and external factors. This study aims to investigate the relationships between software test metrics used in the industry and software testing efforts. A method for estimating the testing effort is proposed using a novel set of software testing metrics that have not been used in any previously proposed software test effort estimation methods. In this study, 15 completed software projects of a CMMI Level-3 certified defense industry company were analyzed. The results of the empirical study show that the proposed method with the given metrics provides acceptable prediction quality, with Pred (0.25) and Pred (0.30) values equal to 0.867. We obtained plausible results and demonstrated that our newly proposed metrics can be safely used for software test effort estimation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Software engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">software measurement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">software metrics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">software quality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">software testing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tulin Ercelebi Ayyildiz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">IEEE Access</subfield><subfield code="d">IEEE, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2022), Seite 48082-48087</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)728440385</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2687964-5</subfield><subfield code="x">21693536</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:48082-48087</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172326</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/bf682030ddf54ddab50469da7a11cd87</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9766342/</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">48082-48087</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400011

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

An Empirical Study on Software Test Effort Estimation for Defense Projects

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?