Central corneal thickness using EX500 excimer laser workstation
AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of central conreal thickness(CCT)using EX500 Excimer Laser workstation(EX500)in laser <i<in situ </i<keratomileusis(LASIK)patients.<p<METHODS: The CCT of 120 eyes(63 patients)who had LASIK between January 2013 and June 2013 were measured by A-scan and...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Jiao Chen [verfasserIn] Hua Wang [verfasserIn] Shu-Xi He [verfasserIn] Dong-Qiang Luo [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2014 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Guoji Yanke Zazhi - Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS), 2017, 14(2014), 10, Seite 1828-1830 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:14 ; year:2014 ; number:10 ; pages:1828-1830 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ02820350X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ02820350X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230307123736.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230226s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ02820350X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a RE1-994 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Jiao Chen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Central corneal thickness using EX500 excimer laser workstation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of central conreal thickness(CCT)using EX500 Excimer Laser workstation(EX500)in laser <i<in situ </i<keratomileusis(LASIK)patients.<p<METHODS: The CCT of 120 eyes(63 patients)who had LASIK between January 2013 and June 2013 were measured by A-scan and EX500. Three groups were classified: <550μm, 500～550μm, <500μm according the CCT value of A-scan. The CCT were measured again by corneal flap creating by moria SBK microkeratome. The thickness of the corneal bed stroma were measured by A-scan and EX500 after keratomileusis. All outcomes were analyzed with paired <i<t</i< test.<p<RESULTS: The average preoperative CCT value was 527.9±34.3μm measured by A-scan, 528.5±34.6μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.736, <i<P</i<=0.085). In group which CCT <550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 571.4±17.3μm measured by A-scan, 572.7±15.7μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.857, <i<P</i<=0.072). In group which CCT 500～550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 523.4±13.1μm measured by A-scan, 524.2±12.4μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.934, <i<P</i<=0.058). In group which CCT <500μm, the average preoperative CCT value 484.5±9.8μm measured by A-scan, 483.7±8.9μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.395, <i<P</i<=0.174). The average CCT value after corneal flap lifting was 401.3±34.2μm measured by A-scan, 393.4±38.9μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=6.669, <i<P</i<=0.000). The average thickness of the corneal bed stroma value after keratomileusis was 332.6±38.3μm measured by A-scan, 307.3±37.1μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=17.165, <i<P</i<=0.000).<p<CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between preoperative CCT value measured by A-scan and EX500. After corneal flap lifting and keratomileusis, the CCT value measured by EX500 is smaller than measured by A-scan. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a central corneal thickness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EX500 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a A-scan | |
| 650 | 4 | |a LASIK | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Ophthalmology | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Hua Wang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Shu-Xi He |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Dong-Qiang Luo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Guoji Yanke Zazhi |d Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS), 2017 |g 14(2014), 10, Seite 1828-1830 |w (DE-627)1680946854 |x 16725123 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2014 |g number:10 |g pages:1828-1830 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2014/10/201410024.pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2817 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 14 |j 2014 |e 10 |h 1828-1830 | ||
| author_variant |
j c jc h w hw s x h sxh d q l dql |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:16725123:2014----::etacrelhcnsuigx0ecmra |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2014 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
RE |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| allfields |
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24 doi (DE-627)DOAJ02820350X (DE-599)DOAJ8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RE1-994 Jiao Chen verfasserin aut Central corneal thickness using EX500 excimer laser workstation 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of central conreal thickness(CCT)using EX500 Excimer Laser workstation(EX500)in laser <i<in situ </i<keratomileusis(LASIK)patients.<p<METHODS: The CCT of 120 eyes(63 patients)who had LASIK between January 2013 and June 2013 were measured by A-scan and EX500. Three groups were classified: <550μm, 500～550μm, <500μm according the CCT value of A-scan. The CCT were measured again by corneal flap creating by moria SBK microkeratome. The thickness of the corneal bed stroma were measured by A-scan and EX500 after keratomileusis. All outcomes were analyzed with paired <i<t</i< test.<p<RESULTS: The average preoperative CCT value was 527.9±34.3μm measured by A-scan, 528.5±34.6μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.736, <i<P</i<=0.085). In group which CCT <550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 571.4±17.3μm measured by A-scan, 572.7±15.7μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.857, <i<P</i<=0.072). In group which CCT 500～550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 523.4±13.1μm measured by A-scan, 524.2±12.4μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.934, <i<P</i<=0.058). In group which CCT <500μm, the average preoperative CCT value 484.5±9.8μm measured by A-scan, 483.7±8.9μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.395, <i<P</i<=0.174). The average CCT value after corneal flap lifting was 401.3±34.2μm measured by A-scan, 393.4±38.9μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=6.669, <i<P</i<=0.000). The average thickness of the corneal bed stroma value after keratomileusis was 332.6±38.3μm measured by A-scan, 307.3±37.1μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=17.165, <i<P</i<=0.000).<p<CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between preoperative CCT value measured by A-scan and EX500. After corneal flap lifting and keratomileusis, the CCT value measured by EX500 is smaller than measured by A-scan. central corneal thickness EX500 A-scan LASIK Ophthalmology Hua Wang verfasserin aut Shu-Xi He verfasserin aut Dong-Qiang Luo verfasserin aut In Guoji Yanke Zazhi Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS), 2017 14(2014), 10, Seite 1828-1830 (DE-627)1680946854 16725123 nnns volume:14 year:2014 number:10 pages:1828-1830 https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735 kostenfrei http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2014/10/201410024.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2817 AR 14 2014 10 1828-1830 |
| spelling |
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24 doi (DE-627)DOAJ02820350X (DE-599)DOAJ8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RE1-994 Jiao Chen verfasserin aut Central corneal thickness using EX500 excimer laser workstation 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of central conreal thickness(CCT)using EX500 Excimer Laser workstation(EX500)in laser <i<in situ </i<keratomileusis(LASIK)patients.<p<METHODS: The CCT of 120 eyes(63 patients)who had LASIK between January 2013 and June 2013 were measured by A-scan and EX500. Three groups were classified: <550μm, 500～550μm, <500μm according the CCT value of A-scan. The CCT were measured again by corneal flap creating by moria SBK microkeratome. The thickness of the corneal bed stroma were measured by A-scan and EX500 after keratomileusis. All outcomes were analyzed with paired <i<t</i< test.<p<RESULTS: The average preoperative CCT value was 527.9±34.3μm measured by A-scan, 528.5±34.6μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.736, <i<P</i<=0.085). In group which CCT <550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 571.4±17.3μm measured by A-scan, 572.7±15.7μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.857, <i<P</i<=0.072). In group which CCT 500～550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 523.4±13.1μm measured by A-scan, 524.2±12.4μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.934, <i<P</i<=0.058). In group which CCT <500μm, the average preoperative CCT value 484.5±9.8μm measured by A-scan, 483.7±8.9μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.395, <i<P</i<=0.174). The average CCT value after corneal flap lifting was 401.3±34.2μm measured by A-scan, 393.4±38.9μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=6.669, <i<P</i<=0.000). The average thickness of the corneal bed stroma value after keratomileusis was 332.6±38.3μm measured by A-scan, 307.3±37.1μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=17.165, <i<P</i<=0.000).<p<CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between preoperative CCT value measured by A-scan and EX500. After corneal flap lifting and keratomileusis, the CCT value measured by EX500 is smaller than measured by A-scan. central corneal thickness EX500 A-scan LASIK Ophthalmology Hua Wang verfasserin aut Shu-Xi He verfasserin aut Dong-Qiang Luo verfasserin aut In Guoji Yanke Zazhi Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS), 2017 14(2014), 10, Seite 1828-1830 (DE-627)1680946854 16725123 nnns volume:14 year:2014 number:10 pages:1828-1830 https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735 kostenfrei http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2014/10/201410024.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2817 AR 14 2014 10 1828-1830 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24 doi (DE-627)DOAJ02820350X (DE-599)DOAJ8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RE1-994 Jiao Chen verfasserin aut Central corneal thickness using EX500 excimer laser workstation 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of central conreal thickness(CCT)using EX500 Excimer Laser workstation(EX500)in laser <i<in situ </i<keratomileusis(LASIK)patients.<p<METHODS: The CCT of 120 eyes(63 patients)who had LASIK between January 2013 and June 2013 were measured by A-scan and EX500. Three groups were classified: <550μm, 500～550μm, <500μm according the CCT value of A-scan. The CCT were measured again by corneal flap creating by moria SBK microkeratome. The thickness of the corneal bed stroma were measured by A-scan and EX500 after keratomileusis. All outcomes were analyzed with paired <i<t</i< test.<p<RESULTS: The average preoperative CCT value was 527.9±34.3μm measured by A-scan, 528.5±34.6μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.736, <i<P</i<=0.085). In group which CCT <550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 571.4±17.3μm measured by A-scan, 572.7±15.7μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.857, <i<P</i<=0.072). In group which CCT 500～550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 523.4±13.1μm measured by A-scan, 524.2±12.4μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.934, <i<P</i<=0.058). In group which CCT <500μm, the average preoperative CCT value 484.5±9.8μm measured by A-scan, 483.7±8.9μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.395, <i<P</i<=0.174). The average CCT value after corneal flap lifting was 401.3±34.2μm measured by A-scan, 393.4±38.9μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=6.669, <i<P</i<=0.000). The average thickness of the corneal bed stroma value after keratomileusis was 332.6±38.3μm measured by A-scan, 307.3±37.1μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=17.165, <i<P</i<=0.000).<p<CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between preoperative CCT value measured by A-scan and EX500. After corneal flap lifting and keratomileusis, the CCT value measured by EX500 is smaller than measured by A-scan. central corneal thickness EX500 A-scan LASIK Ophthalmology Hua Wang verfasserin aut Shu-Xi He verfasserin aut Dong-Qiang Luo verfasserin aut In Guoji Yanke Zazhi Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS), 2017 14(2014), 10, Seite 1828-1830 (DE-627)1680946854 16725123 nnns volume:14 year:2014 number:10 pages:1828-1830 https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735 kostenfrei http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2014/10/201410024.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2817 AR 14 2014 10 1828-1830 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24 doi (DE-627)DOAJ02820350X (DE-599)DOAJ8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RE1-994 Jiao Chen verfasserin aut Central corneal thickness using EX500 excimer laser workstation 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of central conreal thickness(CCT)using EX500 Excimer Laser workstation(EX500)in laser <i<in situ </i<keratomileusis(LASIK)patients.<p<METHODS: The CCT of 120 eyes(63 patients)who had LASIK between January 2013 and June 2013 were measured by A-scan and EX500. Three groups were classified: <550μm, 500～550μm, <500μm according the CCT value of A-scan. The CCT were measured again by corneal flap creating by moria SBK microkeratome. The thickness of the corneal bed stroma were measured by A-scan and EX500 after keratomileusis. All outcomes were analyzed with paired <i<t</i< test.<p<RESULTS: The average preoperative CCT value was 527.9±34.3μm measured by A-scan, 528.5±34.6μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.736, <i<P</i<=0.085). In group which CCT <550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 571.4±17.3μm measured by A-scan, 572.7±15.7μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.857, <i<P</i<=0.072). In group which CCT 500～550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 523.4±13.1μm measured by A-scan, 524.2±12.4μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.934, <i<P</i<=0.058). In group which CCT <500μm, the average preoperative CCT value 484.5±9.8μm measured by A-scan, 483.7±8.9μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.395, <i<P</i<=0.174). The average CCT value after corneal flap lifting was 401.3±34.2μm measured by A-scan, 393.4±38.9μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=6.669, <i<P</i<=0.000). The average thickness of the corneal bed stroma value after keratomileusis was 332.6±38.3μm measured by A-scan, 307.3±37.1μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=17.165, <i<P</i<=0.000).<p<CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between preoperative CCT value measured by A-scan and EX500. After corneal flap lifting and keratomileusis, the CCT value measured by EX500 is smaller than measured by A-scan. central corneal thickness EX500 A-scan LASIK Ophthalmology Hua Wang verfasserin aut Shu-Xi He verfasserin aut Dong-Qiang Luo verfasserin aut In Guoji Yanke Zazhi Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS), 2017 14(2014), 10, Seite 1828-1830 (DE-627)1680946854 16725123 nnns volume:14 year:2014 number:10 pages:1828-1830 https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735 kostenfrei http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2014/10/201410024.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2817 AR 14 2014 10 1828-1830 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24 doi (DE-627)DOAJ02820350X (DE-599)DOAJ8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RE1-994 Jiao Chen verfasserin aut Central corneal thickness using EX500 excimer laser workstation 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of central conreal thickness(CCT)using EX500 Excimer Laser workstation(EX500)in laser <i<in situ </i<keratomileusis(LASIK)patients.<p<METHODS: The CCT of 120 eyes(63 patients)who had LASIK between January 2013 and June 2013 were measured by A-scan and EX500. Three groups were classified: <550μm, 500～550μm, <500μm according the CCT value of A-scan. The CCT were measured again by corneal flap creating by moria SBK microkeratome. The thickness of the corneal bed stroma were measured by A-scan and EX500 after keratomileusis. All outcomes were analyzed with paired <i<t</i< test.<p<RESULTS: The average preoperative CCT value was 527.9±34.3μm measured by A-scan, 528.5±34.6μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.736, <i<P</i<=0.085). In group which CCT <550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 571.4±17.3μm measured by A-scan, 572.7±15.7μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.857, <i<P</i<=0.072). In group which CCT 500～550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 523.4±13.1μm measured by A-scan, 524.2±12.4μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.934, <i<P</i<=0.058). In group which CCT <500μm, the average preoperative CCT value 484.5±9.8μm measured by A-scan, 483.7±8.9μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.395, <i<P</i<=0.174). The average CCT value after corneal flap lifting was 401.3±34.2μm measured by A-scan, 393.4±38.9μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=6.669, <i<P</i<=0.000). The average thickness of the corneal bed stroma value after keratomileusis was 332.6±38.3μm measured by A-scan, 307.3±37.1μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=17.165, <i<P</i<=0.000).<p<CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between preoperative CCT value measured by A-scan and EX500. After corneal flap lifting and keratomileusis, the CCT value measured by EX500 is smaller than measured by A-scan. central corneal thickness EX500 A-scan LASIK Ophthalmology Hua Wang verfasserin aut Shu-Xi He verfasserin aut Dong-Qiang Luo verfasserin aut In Guoji Yanke Zazhi Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS), 2017 14(2014), 10, Seite 1828-1830 (DE-627)1680946854 16725123 nnns volume:14 year:2014 number:10 pages:1828-1830 https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735 kostenfrei http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2014/10/201410024.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2817 AR 14 2014 10 1828-1830 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Guoji Yanke Zazhi 14(2014), 10, Seite 1828-1830 volume:14 year:2014 number:10 pages:1828-1830 |
| sourceStr |
In Guoji Yanke Zazhi 14(2014), 10, Seite 1828-1830 volume:14 year:2014 number:10 pages:1828-1830 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
central corneal thickness EX500 A-scan LASIK Ophthalmology |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Guoji Yanke Zazhi |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jiao Chen @@aut@@ Hua Wang @@aut@@ Shu-Xi He @@aut@@ Dong-Qiang Luo @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1680946854 |
| id |
DOAJ02820350X |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ02820350X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307123736.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ02820350X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RE1-994</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jiao Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Central corneal thickness using EX500 excimer laser workstation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of central conreal thickness(CCT)using EX500 Excimer Laser workstation(EX500)in laser <i<in situ </i<keratomileusis(LASIK)patients.<p<METHODS: The CCT of 120 eyes(63 patients)who had LASIK between January 2013 and June 2013 were measured by A-scan and EX500. Three groups were classified: <550μm, 500～550μm, <500μm according the CCT value of A-scan. The CCT were measured again by corneal flap creating by moria SBK microkeratome. The thickness of the corneal bed stroma were measured by A-scan and EX500 after keratomileusis. All outcomes were analyzed with paired <i<t</i< test.<p<RESULTS: The average preoperative CCT value was 527.9±34.3μm measured by A-scan, 528.5±34.6μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.736, <i<P</i<=0.085). In group which CCT <550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 571.4±17.3μm measured by A-scan, 572.7±15.7μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.857, <i<P</i<=0.072). In group which CCT 500～550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 523.4±13.1μm measured by A-scan, 524.2±12.4μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.934, <i<P</i<=0.058). In group which CCT <500μm, the average preoperative CCT value 484.5±9.8μm measured by A-scan, 483.7±8.9μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.395, <i<P</i<=0.174). The average CCT value after corneal flap lifting was 401.3±34.2μm measured by A-scan, 393.4±38.9μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=6.669, <i<P</i<=0.000). The average thickness of the corneal bed stroma value after keratomileusis was 332.6±38.3μm measured by A-scan, 307.3±37.1μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=17.165, <i<P</i<=0.000).<p<CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between preoperative CCT value measured by A-scan and EX500. After corneal flap lifting and keratomileusis, the CCT value measured by EX500 is smaller than measured by A-scan.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">central corneal thickness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EX500</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">A-scan</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LASIK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ophthalmology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hua Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shu-Xi He</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dong-Qiang Luo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Guoji Yanke Zazhi</subfield><subfield code="d">Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS), 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2014), 10, Seite 1828-1830</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1680946854</subfield><subfield code="x">16725123</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1828-1830</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2014/10/201410024.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2817</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">10</subfield><subfield code="h">1828-1830</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
| author |
Jiao Chen |
| spellingShingle |
Jiao Chen misc RE1-994 misc central corneal thickness misc EX500 misc A-scan misc LASIK misc Ophthalmology Central corneal thickness using EX500 excimer laser workstation |
| authorStr |
Jiao Chen |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1680946854 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
RE1-994 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
16725123 |
| topic_title |
RE1-994 Central corneal thickness using EX500 excimer laser workstation central corneal thickness EX500 A-scan LASIK |
| topic |
misc RE1-994 misc central corneal thickness misc EX500 misc A-scan misc LASIK misc Ophthalmology |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc RE1-994 misc central corneal thickness misc EX500 misc A-scan misc LASIK misc Ophthalmology |
| topic_browse |
misc RE1-994 misc central corneal thickness misc EX500 misc A-scan misc LASIK misc Ophthalmology |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Guoji Yanke Zazhi |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1680946854 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Guoji Yanke Zazhi |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1680946854 |
| title |
Central corneal thickness using EX500 excimer laser workstation |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ02820350X (DE-599)DOAJ8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735 |
| title_full |
Central corneal thickness using EX500 excimer laser workstation |
| author_sort |
Jiao Chen |
| journal |
Guoji Yanke Zazhi |
| journalStr |
Guoji Yanke Zazhi |
| callnumber-first-code |
R |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2014 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1828 |
| author_browse |
Jiao Chen Hua Wang Shu-Xi He Dong-Qiang Luo |
| container_volume |
14 |
| class |
RE1-994 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Jiao Chen |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
central corneal thickness using ex500 excimer laser workstation |
| callnumber |
RE1-994 |
| title_auth |
Central corneal thickness using EX500 excimer laser workstation |
| abstract |
AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of central conreal thickness(CCT)using EX500 Excimer Laser workstation(EX500)in laser <i<in situ </i<keratomileusis(LASIK)patients.<p<METHODS: The CCT of 120 eyes(63 patients)who had LASIK between January 2013 and June 2013 were measured by A-scan and EX500. Three groups were classified: <550μm, 500～550μm, <500μm according the CCT value of A-scan. The CCT were measured again by corneal flap creating by moria SBK microkeratome. The thickness of the corneal bed stroma were measured by A-scan and EX500 after keratomileusis. All outcomes were analyzed with paired <i<t</i< test.<p<RESULTS: The average preoperative CCT value was 527.9±34.3μm measured by A-scan, 528.5±34.6μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.736, <i<P</i<=0.085). In group which CCT <550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 571.4±17.3μm measured by A-scan, 572.7±15.7μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.857, <i<P</i<=0.072). In group which CCT 500～550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 523.4±13.1μm measured by A-scan, 524.2±12.4μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.934, <i<P</i<=0.058). In group which CCT <500μm, the average preoperative CCT value 484.5±9.8μm measured by A-scan, 483.7±8.9μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.395, <i<P</i<=0.174). The average CCT value after corneal flap lifting was 401.3±34.2μm measured by A-scan, 393.4±38.9μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=6.669, <i<P</i<=0.000). The average thickness of the corneal bed stroma value after keratomileusis was 332.6±38.3μm measured by A-scan, 307.3±37.1μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=17.165, <i<P</i<=0.000).<p<CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between preoperative CCT value measured by A-scan and EX500. After corneal flap lifting and keratomileusis, the CCT value measured by EX500 is smaller than measured by A-scan. |
| abstractGer |
AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of central conreal thickness(CCT)using EX500 Excimer Laser workstation(EX500)in laser <i<in situ </i<keratomileusis(LASIK)patients.<p<METHODS: The CCT of 120 eyes(63 patients)who had LASIK between January 2013 and June 2013 were measured by A-scan and EX500. Three groups were classified: <550μm, 500～550μm, <500μm according the CCT value of A-scan. The CCT were measured again by corneal flap creating by moria SBK microkeratome. The thickness of the corneal bed stroma were measured by A-scan and EX500 after keratomileusis. All outcomes were analyzed with paired <i<t</i< test.<p<RESULTS: The average preoperative CCT value was 527.9±34.3μm measured by A-scan, 528.5±34.6μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.736, <i<P</i<=0.085). In group which CCT <550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 571.4±17.3μm measured by A-scan, 572.7±15.7μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.857, <i<P</i<=0.072). In group which CCT 500～550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 523.4±13.1μm measured by A-scan, 524.2±12.4μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.934, <i<P</i<=0.058). In group which CCT <500μm, the average preoperative CCT value 484.5±9.8μm measured by A-scan, 483.7±8.9μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.395, <i<P</i<=0.174). The average CCT value after corneal flap lifting was 401.3±34.2μm measured by A-scan, 393.4±38.9μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=6.669, <i<P</i<=0.000). The average thickness of the corneal bed stroma value after keratomileusis was 332.6±38.3μm measured by A-scan, 307.3±37.1μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=17.165, <i<P</i<=0.000).<p<CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between preoperative CCT value measured by A-scan and EX500. After corneal flap lifting and keratomileusis, the CCT value measured by EX500 is smaller than measured by A-scan. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of central conreal thickness(CCT)using EX500 Excimer Laser workstation(EX500)in laser <i<in situ </i<keratomileusis(LASIK)patients.<p<METHODS: The CCT of 120 eyes(63 patients)who had LASIK between January 2013 and June 2013 were measured by A-scan and EX500. Three groups were classified: <550μm, 500～550μm, <500μm according the CCT value of A-scan. The CCT were measured again by corneal flap creating by moria SBK microkeratome. The thickness of the corneal bed stroma were measured by A-scan and EX500 after keratomileusis. All outcomes were analyzed with paired <i<t</i< test.<p<RESULTS: The average preoperative CCT value was 527.9±34.3μm measured by A-scan, 528.5±34.6μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.736, <i<P</i<=0.085). In group which CCT <550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 571.4±17.3μm measured by A-scan, 572.7±15.7μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.857, <i<P</i<=0.072). In group which CCT 500～550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 523.4±13.1μm measured by A-scan, 524.2±12.4μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.934, <i<P</i<=0.058). In group which CCT <500μm, the average preoperative CCT value 484.5±9.8μm measured by A-scan, 483.7±8.9μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.395, <i<P</i<=0.174). The average CCT value after corneal flap lifting was 401.3±34.2μm measured by A-scan, 393.4±38.9μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=6.669, <i<P</i<=0.000). The average thickness of the corneal bed stroma value after keratomileusis was 332.6±38.3μm measured by A-scan, 307.3±37.1μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=17.165, <i<P</i<=0.000).<p<CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between preoperative CCT value measured by A-scan and EX500. After corneal flap lifting and keratomileusis, the CCT value measured by EX500 is smaller than measured by A-scan. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2817 |
| container_issue |
10 |
| title_short |
Central corneal thickness using EX500 excimer laser workstation |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24 https://doaj.org/article/8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735 http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2014/10/201410024.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Hua Wang Shu-Xi He Dong-Qiang Luo |
| author2Str |
Hua Wang Shu-Xi He Dong-Qiang Luo |
| ppnlink |
1680946854 |
| callnumber-subject |
RE - Ophthalmology |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24 |
| callnumber-a |
RE1-994 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T16:18:14.848Z |
| _version_ |
1803575356136882176 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ02820350X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307123736.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ02820350X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RE1-994</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jiao Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Central corneal thickness using EX500 excimer laser workstation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of central conreal thickness(CCT)using EX500 Excimer Laser workstation(EX500)in laser <i<in situ </i<keratomileusis(LASIK)patients.<p<METHODS: The CCT of 120 eyes(63 patients)who had LASIK between January 2013 and June 2013 were measured by A-scan and EX500. Three groups were classified: <550μm, 500～550μm, <500μm according the CCT value of A-scan. The CCT were measured again by corneal flap creating by moria SBK microkeratome. The thickness of the corneal bed stroma were measured by A-scan and EX500 after keratomileusis. All outcomes were analyzed with paired <i<t</i< test.<p<RESULTS: The average preoperative CCT value was 527.9±34.3μm measured by A-scan, 528.5±34.6μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.736, <i<P</i<=0.085). In group which CCT <550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 571.4±17.3μm measured by A-scan, 572.7±15.7μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.857, <i<P</i<=0.072). In group which CCT 500～550μm, the average preoperative CCT value was 523.4±13.1μm measured by A-scan, 524.2±12.4μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.934, <i<P</i<=0.058). In group which CCT <500μm, the average preoperative CCT value 484.5±9.8μm measured by A-scan, 483.7±8.9μm measured by EX500. There was no significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=1.395, <i<P</i<=0.174). The average CCT value after corneal flap lifting was 401.3±34.2μm measured by A-scan, 393.4±38.9μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=6.669, <i<P</i<=0.000). The average thickness of the corneal bed stroma value after keratomileusis was 332.6±38.3μm measured by A-scan, 307.3±37.1μm measured by EX500. There was a significant difference between these two measurements(<i<t</i<=17.165, <i<P</i<=0.000).<p<CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between preoperative CCT value measured by A-scan and EX500. After corneal flap lifting and keratomileusis, the CCT value measured by EX500 is smaller than measured by A-scan.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">central corneal thickness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EX500</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">A-scan</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LASIK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ophthalmology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hua Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shu-Xi He</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dong-Qiang Luo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Guoji Yanke Zazhi</subfield><subfield code="d">Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS), 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2014), 10, Seite 1828-1830</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1680946854</subfield><subfield code="x">16725123</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1828-1830</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.24</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8a876e1451914088835bcba7faf49735</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2014/10/201410024.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2817</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">10</subfield><subfield code="h">1828-1830</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3990564 |