Seroprevalence of Rubella Immunity (IgG Antibody) among Female Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Southern India

Introduction: Rubella is a mild exanthematous illness caused by Rubella virus which belongs to the family Togaviridae. Rubella is considered of public health importance for the teratogenic potential of the virus, this lead to disastrous consequences in pregnant women if contracted during first trimester. An effective and safe vaccine against rubella is available, yet according to estimation, over 100,000 infants are born with Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) annually worldwide. Rubella is endemic in India and CRS contributes in morbidity and mortality among the live birth. As rubella vaccine has been incorporated in their immunisation schedule, the incidence of rubella has been reduced drastically. But still seronegative population has been noted in various studies in India. Aim: To evaluate the immune status (Rubella specific IgG antibody) of Rubella among Health Care Workers (HCW) of our hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted among female health care students and workers (n=145) in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Chennai from January to February 2017. Blood samples were collected after getting informed consent and serum was separated. A rubella specific IgG antibody was detected by ELISA using the commercially available kit as per the manufacturer’s instruction. Samples showing IgG antibody titre <10 IU/mL were taken as positive and ≤10 IU/mL as negative. The results were analysed statistically using Epi Info version 7.2. Results: A total n=145 samples were analysed and among which 124 (85.5%) workers had adequate titre and 21 (14.48%) were negative for rubella IgG antibody. The mean age of the participants was 19.65. The participants were MBBS students (n=75), BDS students (n=48), Laboratory technicians (n=12), Staff nurses (n=9) and Doctor (n=1). None of them was remembering their vaccination status. Conclusion: The study concludes that immunisation of HCWs against rubella is an important target regardless of their vaccination status. There is a more chance of exposure to infection and also in transmission of infection in the hospital environment. Hence, maintenance of immunity is an essential part of prevention and infection control scheme. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	S Kandasamy [verfasserIn] D Jeyakumari [verfasserIn] E Premalatha [verfasserIn] Jamunrani Srirangaramasamy [verfasserIn] M Balamurugan [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2019

Schlagwörter:	immunisation medical students serosurvey

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited, 2009, 13(2019), 7, Seite DC10-DC13
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:13 ; year:2019 ; number:7 ; pages:DC10-DC13

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ028213904

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ028213904
003	DE-627
005	20230307123810.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ028213904
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJd6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	0		\|a S Kandasamy \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Seroprevalence of Rubella Immunity (IgG Antibody) among Female Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Southern India
264		1	\|c 2019
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Introduction: Rubella is a mild exanthematous illness caused by Rubella virus which belongs to the family Togaviridae. Rubella is considered of public health importance for the teratogenic potential of the virus, this lead to disastrous consequences in pregnant women if contracted during first trimester. An effective and safe vaccine against rubella is available, yet according to estimation, over 100,000 infants are born with Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) annually worldwide. Rubella is endemic in India and CRS contributes in morbidity and mortality among the live birth. As rubella vaccine has been incorporated in their immunisation schedule, the incidence of rubella has been reduced drastically. But still seronegative population has been noted in various studies in India. Aim: To evaluate the immune status (Rubella specific IgG antibody) of Rubella among Health Care Workers (HCW) of our hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted among female health care students and workers (n=145) in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Chennai from January to February 2017. Blood samples were collected after getting informed consent and serum was separated. A rubella specific IgG antibody was detected by ELISA using the commercially available kit as per the manufacturer’s instruction. Samples showing IgG antibody titre <10 IU/mL were taken as positive and ≤10 IU/mL as negative. The results were analysed statistically using Epi Info version 7.2. Results: A total n=145 samples were analysed and among which 124 (85.5%) workers had adequate titre and 21 (14.48%) were negative for rubella IgG antibody. The mean age of the participants was 19.65. The participants were MBBS students (n=75), BDS students (n=48), Laboratory technicians (n=12), Staff nurses (n=9) and Doctor (n=1). None of them was remembering their vaccination status. Conclusion: The study concludes that immunisation of HCWs against rubella is an important target regardless of their vaccination status. There is a more chance of exposure to infection and also in transmission of infection in the hospital environment. Hence, maintenance of immunity is an essential part of prevention and infection control scheme.
650		4	\|a immunisation
650		4	\|a medical students
650		4	\|a serosurvey
653		0	\|a Medicine
653		0	\|a R
700	0		\|a D Jeyakumari \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a E Premalatha \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jamunrani Srirangaramasamy \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a M Balamurugan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research \|d JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited, 2009 \|g 13(2019), 7, Seite DC10-DC13 \|w (DE-627)789478048 \|w (DE-600)2775283-5 \|x 0973709X \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:13 \|g year:2019 \|g number:7 \|g pages:DC10-DC13
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/d6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/12996/40961_CE[Ra1]_F(SL)_PF1(AG_SHU)_PN(SL).pdf \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2249-782X \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/0973-709X \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 13 \|j 2019 \|e 7 \|h DC10-DC13

Indexfelder

author_variant	s k sk d j dj e p ep j s js m b mb
matchkey_str	article:0973709X:2019----::eorvlnefuelimntignioymnfmlhatcrwresn
hierarchy_sort_str	2019
publishDate	2019
allfields	10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028213904 (DE-599)DOAJd6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng S Kandasamy verfasserin aut Seroprevalence of Rubella Immunity (IgG Antibody) among Female Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Southern India 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Rubella is a mild exanthematous illness caused by Rubella virus which belongs to the family Togaviridae. Rubella is considered of public health importance for the teratogenic potential of the virus, this lead to disastrous consequences in pregnant women if contracted during first trimester. An effective and safe vaccine against rubella is available, yet according to estimation, over 100,000 infants are born with Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) annually worldwide. Rubella is endemic in India and CRS contributes in morbidity and mortality among the live birth. As rubella vaccine has been incorporated in their immunisation schedule, the incidence of rubella has been reduced drastically. But still seronegative population has been noted in various studies in India. Aim: To evaluate the immune status (Rubella specific IgG antibody) of Rubella among Health Care Workers (HCW) of our hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted among female health care students and workers (n=145) in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Chennai from January to February 2017. Blood samples were collected after getting informed consent and serum was separated. A rubella specific IgG antibody was detected by ELISA using the commercially available kit as per the manufacturer’s instruction. Samples showing IgG antibody titre <10 IU/mL were taken as positive and ≤10 IU/mL as negative. The results were analysed statistically using Epi Info version 7.2. Results: A total n=145 samples were analysed and among which 124 (85.5%) workers had adequate titre and 21 (14.48%) were negative for rubella IgG antibody. The mean age of the participants was 19.65. The participants were MBBS students (n=75), BDS students (n=48), Laboratory technicians (n=12), Staff nurses (n=9) and Doctor (n=1). None of them was remembering their vaccination status. Conclusion: The study concludes that immunisation of HCWs against rubella is an important target regardless of their vaccination status. There is a more chance of exposure to infection and also in transmission of infection in the hospital environment. Hence, maintenance of immunity is an essential part of prevention and infection control scheme. immunisation medical students serosurvey Medicine R D Jeyakumari verfasserin aut E Premalatha verfasserin aut Jamunrani Srirangaramasamy verfasserin aut M Balamurugan verfasserin aut In Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited, 2009 13(2019), 7, Seite DC10-DC13 (DE-627)789478048 (DE-600)2775283-5 0973709X nnns volume:13 year:2019 number:7 pages:DC10-DC13 https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064 kostenfrei https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/12996/40961_CE[Ra1]_F(SL)_PF1(AG_SHU)_PN(SL).pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2249-782X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0973-709X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2019 7 DC10-DC13
spelling	10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028213904 (DE-599)DOAJd6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng S Kandasamy verfasserin aut Seroprevalence of Rubella Immunity (IgG Antibody) among Female Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Southern India 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Rubella is a mild exanthematous illness caused by Rubella virus which belongs to the family Togaviridae. Rubella is considered of public health importance for the teratogenic potential of the virus, this lead to disastrous consequences in pregnant women if contracted during first trimester. An effective and safe vaccine against rubella is available, yet according to estimation, over 100,000 infants are born with Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) annually worldwide. Rubella is endemic in India and CRS contributes in morbidity and mortality among the live birth. As rubella vaccine has been incorporated in their immunisation schedule, the incidence of rubella has been reduced drastically. But still seronegative population has been noted in various studies in India. Aim: To evaluate the immune status (Rubella specific IgG antibody) of Rubella among Health Care Workers (HCW) of our hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted among female health care students and workers (n=145) in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Chennai from January to February 2017. Blood samples were collected after getting informed consent and serum was separated. A rubella specific IgG antibody was detected by ELISA using the commercially available kit as per the manufacturer’s instruction. Samples showing IgG antibody titre <10 IU/mL were taken as positive and ≤10 IU/mL as negative. The results were analysed statistically using Epi Info version 7.2. Results: A total n=145 samples were analysed and among which 124 (85.5%) workers had adequate titre and 21 (14.48%) were negative for rubella IgG antibody. The mean age of the participants was 19.65. The participants were MBBS students (n=75), BDS students (n=48), Laboratory technicians (n=12), Staff nurses (n=9) and Doctor (n=1). None of them was remembering their vaccination status. Conclusion: The study concludes that immunisation of HCWs against rubella is an important target regardless of their vaccination status. There is a more chance of exposure to infection and also in transmission of infection in the hospital environment. Hence, maintenance of immunity is an essential part of prevention and infection control scheme. immunisation medical students serosurvey Medicine R D Jeyakumari verfasserin aut E Premalatha verfasserin aut Jamunrani Srirangaramasamy verfasserin aut M Balamurugan verfasserin aut In Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited, 2009 13(2019), 7, Seite DC10-DC13 (DE-627)789478048 (DE-600)2775283-5 0973709X nnns volume:13 year:2019 number:7 pages:DC10-DC13 https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064 kostenfrei https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/12996/40961_CE[Ra1]_F(SL)_PF1(AG_SHU)_PN(SL).pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2249-782X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0973-709X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2019 7 DC10-DC13
allfields_unstemmed	10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028213904 (DE-599)DOAJd6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng S Kandasamy verfasserin aut Seroprevalence of Rubella Immunity (IgG Antibody) among Female Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Southern India 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Rubella is a mild exanthematous illness caused by Rubella virus which belongs to the family Togaviridae. Rubella is considered of public health importance for the teratogenic potential of the virus, this lead to disastrous consequences in pregnant women if contracted during first trimester. An effective and safe vaccine against rubella is available, yet according to estimation, over 100,000 infants are born with Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) annually worldwide. Rubella is endemic in India and CRS contributes in morbidity and mortality among the live birth. As rubella vaccine has been incorporated in their immunisation schedule, the incidence of rubella has been reduced drastically. But still seronegative population has been noted in various studies in India. Aim: To evaluate the immune status (Rubella specific IgG antibody) of Rubella among Health Care Workers (HCW) of our hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted among female health care students and workers (n=145) in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Chennai from January to February 2017. Blood samples were collected after getting informed consent and serum was separated. A rubella specific IgG antibody was detected by ELISA using the commercially available kit as per the manufacturer’s instruction. Samples showing IgG antibody titre <10 IU/mL were taken as positive and ≤10 IU/mL as negative. The results were analysed statistically using Epi Info version 7.2. Results: A total n=145 samples were analysed and among which 124 (85.5%) workers had adequate titre and 21 (14.48%) were negative for rubella IgG antibody. The mean age of the participants was 19.65. The participants were MBBS students (n=75), BDS students (n=48), Laboratory technicians (n=12), Staff nurses (n=9) and Doctor (n=1). None of them was remembering their vaccination status. Conclusion: The study concludes that immunisation of HCWs against rubella is an important target regardless of their vaccination status. There is a more chance of exposure to infection and also in transmission of infection in the hospital environment. Hence, maintenance of immunity is an essential part of prevention and infection control scheme. immunisation medical students serosurvey Medicine R D Jeyakumari verfasserin aut E Premalatha verfasserin aut Jamunrani Srirangaramasamy verfasserin aut M Balamurugan verfasserin aut In Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited, 2009 13(2019), 7, Seite DC10-DC13 (DE-627)789478048 (DE-600)2775283-5 0973709X nnns volume:13 year:2019 number:7 pages:DC10-DC13 https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064 kostenfrei https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/12996/40961_CE[Ra1]_F(SL)_PF1(AG_SHU)_PN(SL).pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2249-782X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0973-709X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2019 7 DC10-DC13
allfieldsGer	10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028213904 (DE-599)DOAJd6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng S Kandasamy verfasserin aut Seroprevalence of Rubella Immunity (IgG Antibody) among Female Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Southern India 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Rubella is a mild exanthematous illness caused by Rubella virus which belongs to the family Togaviridae. Rubella is considered of public health importance for the teratogenic potential of the virus, this lead to disastrous consequences in pregnant women if contracted during first trimester. An effective and safe vaccine against rubella is available, yet according to estimation, over 100,000 infants are born with Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) annually worldwide. Rubella is endemic in India and CRS contributes in morbidity and mortality among the live birth. As rubella vaccine has been incorporated in their immunisation schedule, the incidence of rubella has been reduced drastically. But still seronegative population has been noted in various studies in India. Aim: To evaluate the immune status (Rubella specific IgG antibody) of Rubella among Health Care Workers (HCW) of our hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted among female health care students and workers (n=145) in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Chennai from January to February 2017. Blood samples were collected after getting informed consent and serum was separated. A rubella specific IgG antibody was detected by ELISA using the commercially available kit as per the manufacturer’s instruction. Samples showing IgG antibody titre <10 IU/mL were taken as positive and ≤10 IU/mL as negative. The results were analysed statistically using Epi Info version 7.2. Results: A total n=145 samples were analysed and among which 124 (85.5%) workers had adequate titre and 21 (14.48%) were negative for rubella IgG antibody. The mean age of the participants was 19.65. The participants were MBBS students (n=75), BDS students (n=48), Laboratory technicians (n=12), Staff nurses (n=9) and Doctor (n=1). None of them was remembering their vaccination status. Conclusion: The study concludes that immunisation of HCWs against rubella is an important target regardless of their vaccination status. There is a more chance of exposure to infection and also in transmission of infection in the hospital environment. Hence, maintenance of immunity is an essential part of prevention and infection control scheme. immunisation medical students serosurvey Medicine R D Jeyakumari verfasserin aut E Premalatha verfasserin aut Jamunrani Srirangaramasamy verfasserin aut M Balamurugan verfasserin aut In Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited, 2009 13(2019), 7, Seite DC10-DC13 (DE-627)789478048 (DE-600)2775283-5 0973709X nnns volume:13 year:2019 number:7 pages:DC10-DC13 https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064 kostenfrei https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/12996/40961_CE[Ra1]_F(SL)_PF1(AG_SHU)_PN(SL).pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2249-782X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0973-709X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2019 7 DC10-DC13
allfieldsSound	10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028213904 (DE-599)DOAJd6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng S Kandasamy verfasserin aut Seroprevalence of Rubella Immunity (IgG Antibody) among Female Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Southern India 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Rubella is a mild exanthematous illness caused by Rubella virus which belongs to the family Togaviridae. Rubella is considered of public health importance for the teratogenic potential of the virus, this lead to disastrous consequences in pregnant women if contracted during first trimester. An effective and safe vaccine against rubella is available, yet according to estimation, over 100,000 infants are born with Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) annually worldwide. Rubella is endemic in India and CRS contributes in morbidity and mortality among the live birth. As rubella vaccine has been incorporated in their immunisation schedule, the incidence of rubella has been reduced drastically. But still seronegative population has been noted in various studies in India. Aim: To evaluate the immune status (Rubella specific IgG antibody) of Rubella among Health Care Workers (HCW) of our hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted among female health care students and workers (n=145) in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Chennai from January to February 2017. Blood samples were collected after getting informed consent and serum was separated. A rubella specific IgG antibody was detected by ELISA using the commercially available kit as per the manufacturer’s instruction. Samples showing IgG antibody titre <10 IU/mL were taken as positive and ≤10 IU/mL as negative. The results were analysed statistically using Epi Info version 7.2. Results: A total n=145 samples were analysed and among which 124 (85.5%) workers had adequate titre and 21 (14.48%) were negative for rubella IgG antibody. The mean age of the participants was 19.65. The participants were MBBS students (n=75), BDS students (n=48), Laboratory technicians (n=12), Staff nurses (n=9) and Doctor (n=1). None of them was remembering their vaccination status. Conclusion: The study concludes that immunisation of HCWs against rubella is an important target regardless of their vaccination status. There is a more chance of exposure to infection and also in transmission of infection in the hospital environment. Hence, maintenance of immunity is an essential part of prevention and infection control scheme. immunisation medical students serosurvey Medicine R D Jeyakumari verfasserin aut E Premalatha verfasserin aut Jamunrani Srirangaramasamy verfasserin aut M Balamurugan verfasserin aut In Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited, 2009 13(2019), 7, Seite DC10-DC13 (DE-627)789478048 (DE-600)2775283-5 0973709X nnns volume:13 year:2019 number:7 pages:DC10-DC13 https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064 kostenfrei https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/12996/40961_CE[Ra1]_F(SL)_PF1(AG_SHU)_PN(SL).pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2249-782X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0973-709X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2019 7 DC10-DC13
language	English
source	In Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 13(2019), 7, Seite DC10-DC13 volume:13 year:2019 number:7 pages:DC10-DC13
sourceStr	In Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 13(2019), 7, Seite DC10-DC13 volume:13 year:2019 number:7 pages:DC10-DC13
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	immunisation medical students serosurvey Medicine R
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
authorswithroles_txt_mv	S Kandasamy @@aut@@ D Jeyakumari @@aut@@ E Premalatha @@aut@@ Jamunrani Srirangaramasamy @@aut@@ M Balamurugan @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	789478048
id	DOAJ028213904
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ028213904</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307123810.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ028213904</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">S Kandasamy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Seroprevalence of Rubella Immunity (IgG Antibody) among Female Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Southern India</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: Rubella is a mild exanthematous illness caused by Rubella virus which belongs to the family Togaviridae. Rubella is considered of public health importance for the teratogenic potential of the virus, this lead to disastrous consequences in pregnant women if contracted during first trimester. An effective and safe vaccine against rubella is available, yet according to estimation, over 100,000 infants are born with Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) annually worldwide. Rubella is endemic in India and CRS contributes in morbidity and mortality among the live birth. As rubella vaccine has been incorporated in their immunisation schedule, the incidence of rubella has been reduced drastically. But still seronegative population has been noted in various studies in India. Aim: To evaluate the immune status (Rubella specific IgG antibody) of Rubella among Health Care Workers (HCW) of our hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted among female health care students and workers (n=145) in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Chennai from January to February 2017. Blood samples were collected after getting informed consent and serum was separated. A rubella specific IgG antibody was detected by ELISA using the commercially available kit as per the manufacturer’s instruction. Samples showing IgG antibody titre <10 IU/mL were taken as positive and ≤10 IU/mL as negative. The results were analysed statistically using Epi Info version 7.2. Results: A total n=145 samples were analysed and among which 124 (85.5%) workers had adequate titre and 21 (14.48%) were negative for rubella IgG antibody. The mean age of the participants was 19.65. The participants were MBBS students (n=75), BDS students (n=48), Laboratory technicians (n=12), Staff nurses (n=9) and Doctor (n=1). None of them was remembering their vaccination status. Conclusion: The study concludes that immunisation of HCWs against rubella is an important target regardless of their vaccination status. There is a more chance of exposure to infection and also in transmission of infection in the hospital environment. Hence, maintenance of immunity is an essential part of prevention and infection control scheme.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">immunisation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">medical students</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">serosurvey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">D Jeyakumari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">E Premalatha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jamunrani Srirangaramasamy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">M Balamurugan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research</subfield><subfield code="d">JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2019), 7, Seite DC10-DC13</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)789478048</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2775283-5</subfield><subfield code="x">0973709X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:DC10-DC13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/12996/40961_CE[Ra1]_F(SL)_PF1(AG_SHU)_PN(SL).pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2249-782X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0973-709X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="h">DC10-DC13</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	S Kandasamy
spellingShingle	S Kandasamy misc immunisation misc medical students misc serosurvey misc Medicine misc R Seroprevalence of Rubella Immunity (IgG Antibody) among Female Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Southern India
authorStr	S Kandasamy
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)789478048
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0973709X
topic_title	Seroprevalence of Rubella Immunity (IgG Antibody) among Female Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Southern India immunisation medical students serosurvey
topic	misc immunisation misc medical students misc serosurvey misc Medicine misc R
topic_unstemmed	misc immunisation misc medical students misc serosurvey misc Medicine misc R
topic_browse	misc immunisation misc medical students misc serosurvey misc Medicine misc R
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
hierarchy_parent_id	789478048
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)789478048 (DE-600)2775283-5
title	Seroprevalence of Rubella Immunity (IgG Antibody) among Female Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Southern India
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ028213904 (DE-599)DOAJd6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064
title_full	Seroprevalence of Rubella Immunity (IgG Antibody) among Female Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Southern India
author_sort	S Kandasamy
journal	Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
journalStr	Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2019
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	S Kandasamy D Jeyakumari E Premalatha Jamunrani Srirangaramasamy M Balamurugan
container_volume	13
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	S Kandasamy
doi_str_mv	10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	seroprevalence of rubella immunity (igg antibody) among female health care workers in a hospital in southern india
title_auth	Seroprevalence of Rubella Immunity (IgG Antibody) among Female Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Southern India
abstract	Introduction: Rubella is a mild exanthematous illness caused by Rubella virus which belongs to the family Togaviridae. Rubella is considered of public health importance for the teratogenic potential of the virus, this lead to disastrous consequences in pregnant women if contracted during first trimester. An effective and safe vaccine against rubella is available, yet according to estimation, over 100,000 infants are born with Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) annually worldwide. Rubella is endemic in India and CRS contributes in morbidity and mortality among the live birth. As rubella vaccine has been incorporated in their immunisation schedule, the incidence of rubella has been reduced drastically. But still seronegative population has been noted in various studies in India. Aim: To evaluate the immune status (Rubella specific IgG antibody) of Rubella among Health Care Workers (HCW) of our hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted among female health care students and workers (n=145) in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Chennai from January to February 2017. Blood samples were collected after getting informed consent and serum was separated. A rubella specific IgG antibody was detected by ELISA using the commercially available kit as per the manufacturer’s instruction. Samples showing IgG antibody titre <10 IU/mL were taken as positive and ≤10 IU/mL as negative. The results were analysed statistically using Epi Info version 7.2. Results: A total n=145 samples were analysed and among which 124 (85.5%) workers had adequate titre and 21 (14.48%) were negative for rubella IgG antibody. The mean age of the participants was 19.65. The participants were MBBS students (n=75), BDS students (n=48), Laboratory technicians (n=12), Staff nurses (n=9) and Doctor (n=1). None of them was remembering their vaccination status. Conclusion: The study concludes that immunisation of HCWs against rubella is an important target regardless of their vaccination status. There is a more chance of exposure to infection and also in transmission of infection in the hospital environment. Hence, maintenance of immunity is an essential part of prevention and infection control scheme.
abstractGer	Introduction: Rubella is a mild exanthematous illness caused by Rubella virus which belongs to the family Togaviridae. Rubella is considered of public health importance for the teratogenic potential of the virus, this lead to disastrous consequences in pregnant women if contracted during first trimester. An effective and safe vaccine against rubella is available, yet according to estimation, over 100,000 infants are born with Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) annually worldwide. Rubella is endemic in India and CRS contributes in morbidity and mortality among the live birth. As rubella vaccine has been incorporated in their immunisation schedule, the incidence of rubella has been reduced drastically. But still seronegative population has been noted in various studies in India. Aim: To evaluate the immune status (Rubella specific IgG antibody) of Rubella among Health Care Workers (HCW) of our hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted among female health care students and workers (n=145) in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Chennai from January to February 2017. Blood samples were collected after getting informed consent and serum was separated. A rubella specific IgG antibody was detected by ELISA using the commercially available kit as per the manufacturer’s instruction. Samples showing IgG antibody titre <10 IU/mL were taken as positive and ≤10 IU/mL as negative. The results were analysed statistically using Epi Info version 7.2. Results: A total n=145 samples were analysed and among which 124 (85.5%) workers had adequate titre and 21 (14.48%) were negative for rubella IgG antibody. The mean age of the participants was 19.65. The participants were MBBS students (n=75), BDS students (n=48), Laboratory technicians (n=12), Staff nurses (n=9) and Doctor (n=1). None of them was remembering their vaccination status. Conclusion: The study concludes that immunisation of HCWs against rubella is an important target regardless of their vaccination status. There is a more chance of exposure to infection and also in transmission of infection in the hospital environment. Hence, maintenance of immunity is an essential part of prevention and infection control scheme.
abstract_unstemmed	Introduction: Rubella is a mild exanthematous illness caused by Rubella virus which belongs to the family Togaviridae. Rubella is considered of public health importance for the teratogenic potential of the virus, this lead to disastrous consequences in pregnant women if contracted during first trimester. An effective and safe vaccine against rubella is available, yet according to estimation, over 100,000 infants are born with Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) annually worldwide. Rubella is endemic in India and CRS contributes in morbidity and mortality among the live birth. As rubella vaccine has been incorporated in their immunisation schedule, the incidence of rubella has been reduced drastically. But still seronegative population has been noted in various studies in India. Aim: To evaluate the immune status (Rubella specific IgG antibody) of Rubella among Health Care Workers (HCW) of our hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted among female health care students and workers (n=145) in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Chennai from January to February 2017. Blood samples were collected after getting informed consent and serum was separated. A rubella specific IgG antibody was detected by ELISA using the commercially available kit as per the manufacturer’s instruction. Samples showing IgG antibody titre <10 IU/mL were taken as positive and ≤10 IU/mL as negative. The results were analysed statistically using Epi Info version 7.2. Results: A total n=145 samples were analysed and among which 124 (85.5%) workers had adequate titre and 21 (14.48%) were negative for rubella IgG antibody. The mean age of the participants was 19.65. The participants were MBBS students (n=75), BDS students (n=48), Laboratory technicians (n=12), Staff nurses (n=9) and Doctor (n=1). None of them was remembering their vaccination status. Conclusion: The study concludes that immunisation of HCWs against rubella is an important target regardless of their vaccination status. There is a more chance of exposure to infection and also in transmission of infection in the hospital environment. Hence, maintenance of immunity is an essential part of prevention and infection control scheme.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	7
title_short	Seroprevalence of Rubella Immunity (IgG Antibody) among Female Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Southern India
url	https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996 https://doaj.org/article/d6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064 https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/12996/40961_CE[Ra1]_F(SL)_PF1(AG_SHU)_PN(SL).pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2249-782X https://doaj.org/toc/0973-709X
remote_bool	true
author2	D Jeyakumari E Premalatha Jamunrani Srirangaramasamy M Balamurugan
author2Str	D Jeyakumari E Premalatha Jamunrani Srirangaramasamy M Balamurugan
ppnlink	789478048
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996
up_date	2024-07-03T16:21:50.783Z
_version_	1803575582562189313
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ028213904</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307123810.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ028213904</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">S Kandasamy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Seroprevalence of Rubella Immunity (IgG Antibody) among Female Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Southern India</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: Rubella is a mild exanthematous illness caused by Rubella virus which belongs to the family Togaviridae. Rubella is considered of public health importance for the teratogenic potential of the virus, this lead to disastrous consequences in pregnant women if contracted during first trimester. An effective and safe vaccine against rubella is available, yet according to estimation, over 100,000 infants are born with Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) annually worldwide. Rubella is endemic in India and CRS contributes in morbidity and mortality among the live birth. As rubella vaccine has been incorporated in their immunisation schedule, the incidence of rubella has been reduced drastically. But still seronegative population has been noted in various studies in India. Aim: To evaluate the immune status (Rubella specific IgG antibody) of Rubella among Health Care Workers (HCW) of our hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted among female health care students and workers (n=145) in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Chennai from January to February 2017. Blood samples were collected after getting informed consent and serum was separated. A rubella specific IgG antibody was detected by ELISA using the commercially available kit as per the manufacturer’s instruction. Samples showing IgG antibody titre <10 IU/mL were taken as positive and ≤10 IU/mL as negative. The results were analysed statistically using Epi Info version 7.2. Results: A total n=145 samples were analysed and among which 124 (85.5%) workers had adequate titre and 21 (14.48%) were negative for rubella IgG antibody. The mean age of the participants was 19.65. The participants were MBBS students (n=75), BDS students (n=48), Laboratory technicians (n=12), Staff nurses (n=9) and Doctor (n=1). None of them was remembering their vaccination status. Conclusion: The study concludes that immunisation of HCWs against rubella is an important target regardless of their vaccination status. There is a more chance of exposure to infection and also in transmission of infection in the hospital environment. Hence, maintenance of immunity is an essential part of prevention and infection control scheme.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">immunisation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">medical students</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">serosurvey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">D Jeyakumari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">E Premalatha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jamunrani Srirangaramasamy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">M Balamurugan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research</subfield><subfield code="d">JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2019), 7, Seite DC10-DC13</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)789478048</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2775283-5</subfield><subfield code="x">0973709X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:DC10-DC13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2019/40961.12996</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d6ff4f754104493184dc2dbd6008a064</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/12996/40961_CE[Ra1]_F(SL)_PF1(AG_SHU)_PN(SL).pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2249-782X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0973-709X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="h">DC10-DC13</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.399721

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Seroprevalence of Rubella Immunity (IgG Antibody) among Female Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Southern India

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?