EFL Male and Female Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences A Case of Iranian EFL University Students
This study was an attempt to investigate a learning style and multiple intelligences survey distributed among two groups of senior-level EFL male and female students to use appropriate techniques and activities for different gender. Two standardized instruments were used during the data collection p...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2012 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Research in English Language Pedagogy - Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch, 2018, 1(2012), 2, Seite 20-28 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:1 ; year:2012 ; number:2 ; pages:20-28 |
Links: |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ028640314 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ028640314 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230307130231.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ028640314 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJbc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a LB5-3640 | |
050 | 0 | |a PE1-3729 | |
100 | 0 | |a Mohammad Reza Sadeghi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a EFL Male and Female Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences A Case of Iranian EFL University Students |
264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This study was an attempt to investigate a learning style and multiple intelligences survey distributed among two groups of senior-level EFL male and female students to use appropriate techniques and activities for different gender. Two standardized instruments were used during the data collection process. It should be noted that a t-test was conducted to conclude the differences between male and female groups. Since there was the same survey as a data elicitation instrument, it was possible to easily compare the results from the two groups. Furthermore, sufficient considerations of both audiences were taken into account during the design of the survey. The first part of the survey aimed at the students’ desired learning styles and the second part focused on multiple intelligences. Data analysis displayed the prevailing learning styles and multiple intelligences in each group. Furthermore, findings revealed that prevailing learning style preferences of the male group were visual, global, closure-oriented, extroverted, and intuitive learning style, respectively, whereas the female group preferred mostly a global, intuitive, closure-oriented, a visual, and finally an extroverted learning style. The findings of the study indicated that knowing the strengths and potentials of the male and female students regarding their multiple intelligences and learning styles would help both language teachers and students in order to make progress, develop language skills, and select appropriate syllabus designs and language learning methods. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Cross-gender studies | |
650 | 4 | |a Learning Styles | |
650 | 4 | |a Multiple Intelligences | |
653 | 0 | |a Theory and practice of education | |
653 | 0 | |a English language | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Research in English Language Pedagogy |d Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch, 2018 |g 1(2012), 2, Seite 20-28 |w (DE-627)1760602582 |x 25384244 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:2012 |g number:2 |g pages:20-28 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/bc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://relp.khuisf.ac.ir/article_533596_56f796f8c709ddea3a8b01cd22fe0bad.pdf |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2588-3259 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2538-4244 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 1 |j 2012 |e 2 |h 20-28 |
author_variant |
m r s mrs |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:25384244:2012----::fmladeaeerigtlsnmlilitliecscsoiai |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2012 |
callnumber-subject-code |
LB |
publishDate |
2012 |
allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ028640314 (DE-599)DOAJbc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng LB5-3640 PE1-3729 Mohammad Reza Sadeghi verfasserin aut EFL Male and Female Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences A Case of Iranian EFL University Students 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study was an attempt to investigate a learning style and multiple intelligences survey distributed among two groups of senior-level EFL male and female students to use appropriate techniques and activities for different gender. Two standardized instruments were used during the data collection process. It should be noted that a t-test was conducted to conclude the differences between male and female groups. Since there was the same survey as a data elicitation instrument, it was possible to easily compare the results from the two groups. Furthermore, sufficient considerations of both audiences were taken into account during the design of the survey. The first part of the survey aimed at the students’ desired learning styles and the second part focused on multiple intelligences. Data analysis displayed the prevailing learning styles and multiple intelligences in each group. Furthermore, findings revealed that prevailing learning style preferences of the male group were visual, global, closure-oriented, extroverted, and intuitive learning style, respectively, whereas the female group preferred mostly a global, intuitive, closure-oriented, a visual, and finally an extroverted learning style. The findings of the study indicated that knowing the strengths and potentials of the male and female students regarding their multiple intelligences and learning styles would help both language teachers and students in order to make progress, develop language skills, and select appropriate syllabus designs and language learning methods. Cross-gender studies Learning Styles Multiple Intelligences Theory and practice of education English language In Research in English Language Pedagogy Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch, 2018 1(2012), 2, Seite 20-28 (DE-627)1760602582 25384244 nnns volume:1 year:2012 number:2 pages:20-28 https://doaj.org/article/bc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83 kostenfrei http://relp.khuisf.ac.ir/article_533596_56f796f8c709ddea3a8b01cd22fe0bad.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2588-3259 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2538-4244 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2012 2 20-28 |
spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ028640314 (DE-599)DOAJbc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng LB5-3640 PE1-3729 Mohammad Reza Sadeghi verfasserin aut EFL Male and Female Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences A Case of Iranian EFL University Students 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study was an attempt to investigate a learning style and multiple intelligences survey distributed among two groups of senior-level EFL male and female students to use appropriate techniques and activities for different gender. Two standardized instruments were used during the data collection process. It should be noted that a t-test was conducted to conclude the differences between male and female groups. Since there was the same survey as a data elicitation instrument, it was possible to easily compare the results from the two groups. Furthermore, sufficient considerations of both audiences were taken into account during the design of the survey. The first part of the survey aimed at the students’ desired learning styles and the second part focused on multiple intelligences. Data analysis displayed the prevailing learning styles and multiple intelligences in each group. Furthermore, findings revealed that prevailing learning style preferences of the male group were visual, global, closure-oriented, extroverted, and intuitive learning style, respectively, whereas the female group preferred mostly a global, intuitive, closure-oriented, a visual, and finally an extroverted learning style. The findings of the study indicated that knowing the strengths and potentials of the male and female students regarding their multiple intelligences and learning styles would help both language teachers and students in order to make progress, develop language skills, and select appropriate syllabus designs and language learning methods. Cross-gender studies Learning Styles Multiple Intelligences Theory and practice of education English language In Research in English Language Pedagogy Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch, 2018 1(2012), 2, Seite 20-28 (DE-627)1760602582 25384244 nnns volume:1 year:2012 number:2 pages:20-28 https://doaj.org/article/bc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83 kostenfrei http://relp.khuisf.ac.ir/article_533596_56f796f8c709ddea3a8b01cd22fe0bad.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2588-3259 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2538-4244 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2012 2 20-28 |
allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ028640314 (DE-599)DOAJbc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng LB5-3640 PE1-3729 Mohammad Reza Sadeghi verfasserin aut EFL Male and Female Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences A Case of Iranian EFL University Students 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study was an attempt to investigate a learning style and multiple intelligences survey distributed among two groups of senior-level EFL male and female students to use appropriate techniques and activities for different gender. Two standardized instruments were used during the data collection process. It should be noted that a t-test was conducted to conclude the differences between male and female groups. Since there was the same survey as a data elicitation instrument, it was possible to easily compare the results from the two groups. Furthermore, sufficient considerations of both audiences were taken into account during the design of the survey. The first part of the survey aimed at the students’ desired learning styles and the second part focused on multiple intelligences. Data analysis displayed the prevailing learning styles and multiple intelligences in each group. Furthermore, findings revealed that prevailing learning style preferences of the male group were visual, global, closure-oriented, extroverted, and intuitive learning style, respectively, whereas the female group preferred mostly a global, intuitive, closure-oriented, a visual, and finally an extroverted learning style. The findings of the study indicated that knowing the strengths and potentials of the male and female students regarding their multiple intelligences and learning styles would help both language teachers and students in order to make progress, develop language skills, and select appropriate syllabus designs and language learning methods. Cross-gender studies Learning Styles Multiple Intelligences Theory and practice of education English language In Research in English Language Pedagogy Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch, 2018 1(2012), 2, Seite 20-28 (DE-627)1760602582 25384244 nnns volume:1 year:2012 number:2 pages:20-28 https://doaj.org/article/bc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83 kostenfrei http://relp.khuisf.ac.ir/article_533596_56f796f8c709ddea3a8b01cd22fe0bad.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2588-3259 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2538-4244 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2012 2 20-28 |
allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ028640314 (DE-599)DOAJbc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng LB5-3640 PE1-3729 Mohammad Reza Sadeghi verfasserin aut EFL Male and Female Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences A Case of Iranian EFL University Students 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study was an attempt to investigate a learning style and multiple intelligences survey distributed among two groups of senior-level EFL male and female students to use appropriate techniques and activities for different gender. Two standardized instruments were used during the data collection process. It should be noted that a t-test was conducted to conclude the differences between male and female groups. Since there was the same survey as a data elicitation instrument, it was possible to easily compare the results from the two groups. Furthermore, sufficient considerations of both audiences were taken into account during the design of the survey. The first part of the survey aimed at the students’ desired learning styles and the second part focused on multiple intelligences. Data analysis displayed the prevailing learning styles and multiple intelligences in each group. Furthermore, findings revealed that prevailing learning style preferences of the male group were visual, global, closure-oriented, extroverted, and intuitive learning style, respectively, whereas the female group preferred mostly a global, intuitive, closure-oriented, a visual, and finally an extroverted learning style. The findings of the study indicated that knowing the strengths and potentials of the male and female students regarding their multiple intelligences and learning styles would help both language teachers and students in order to make progress, develop language skills, and select appropriate syllabus designs and language learning methods. Cross-gender studies Learning Styles Multiple Intelligences Theory and practice of education English language In Research in English Language Pedagogy Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch, 2018 1(2012), 2, Seite 20-28 (DE-627)1760602582 25384244 nnns volume:1 year:2012 number:2 pages:20-28 https://doaj.org/article/bc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83 kostenfrei http://relp.khuisf.ac.ir/article_533596_56f796f8c709ddea3a8b01cd22fe0bad.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2588-3259 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2538-4244 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2012 2 20-28 |
allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ028640314 (DE-599)DOAJbc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng LB5-3640 PE1-3729 Mohammad Reza Sadeghi verfasserin aut EFL Male and Female Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences A Case of Iranian EFL University Students 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study was an attempt to investigate a learning style and multiple intelligences survey distributed among two groups of senior-level EFL male and female students to use appropriate techniques and activities for different gender. Two standardized instruments were used during the data collection process. It should be noted that a t-test was conducted to conclude the differences between male and female groups. Since there was the same survey as a data elicitation instrument, it was possible to easily compare the results from the two groups. Furthermore, sufficient considerations of both audiences were taken into account during the design of the survey. The first part of the survey aimed at the students’ desired learning styles and the second part focused on multiple intelligences. Data analysis displayed the prevailing learning styles and multiple intelligences in each group. Furthermore, findings revealed that prevailing learning style preferences of the male group were visual, global, closure-oriented, extroverted, and intuitive learning style, respectively, whereas the female group preferred mostly a global, intuitive, closure-oriented, a visual, and finally an extroverted learning style. The findings of the study indicated that knowing the strengths and potentials of the male and female students regarding their multiple intelligences and learning styles would help both language teachers and students in order to make progress, develop language skills, and select appropriate syllabus designs and language learning methods. Cross-gender studies Learning Styles Multiple Intelligences Theory and practice of education English language In Research in English Language Pedagogy Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch, 2018 1(2012), 2, Seite 20-28 (DE-627)1760602582 25384244 nnns volume:1 year:2012 number:2 pages:20-28 https://doaj.org/article/bc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83 kostenfrei http://relp.khuisf.ac.ir/article_533596_56f796f8c709ddea3a8b01cd22fe0bad.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2588-3259 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2538-4244 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2012 2 20-28 |
language |
English |
source |
In Research in English Language Pedagogy 1(2012), 2, Seite 20-28 volume:1 year:2012 number:2 pages:20-28 |
sourceStr |
In Research in English Language Pedagogy 1(2012), 2, Seite 20-28 volume:1 year:2012 number:2 pages:20-28 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Cross-gender studies Learning Styles Multiple Intelligences Theory and practice of education English language |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Research in English Language Pedagogy |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1760602582 |
id |
DOAJ028640314 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ028640314</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307130231.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ028640314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJbc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">LB5-3640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">PE1-3729</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Reza Sadeghi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">EFL Male and Female Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences A Case of Iranian EFL University Students</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study was an attempt to investigate a learning style and multiple intelligences survey distributed among two groups of senior-level EFL male and female students to use appropriate techniques and activities for different gender. Two standardized instruments were used during the data collection process. It should be noted that a t-test was conducted to conclude the differences between male and female groups. Since there was the same survey as a data elicitation instrument, it was possible to easily compare the results from the two groups. Furthermore, sufficient considerations of both audiences were taken into account during the design of the survey. The first part of the survey aimed at the students’ desired learning styles and the second part focused on multiple intelligences. Data analysis displayed the prevailing learning styles and multiple intelligences in each group. Furthermore, findings revealed that prevailing learning style preferences of the male group were visual, global, closure-oriented, extroverted, and intuitive learning style, respectively, whereas the female group preferred mostly a global, intuitive, closure-oriented, a visual, and finally an extroverted learning style. The findings of the study indicated that knowing the strengths and potentials of the male and female students regarding their multiple intelligences and learning styles would help both language teachers and students in order to make progress, develop language skills, and select appropriate syllabus designs and language learning methods.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cross-gender studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Learning Styles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multiple Intelligences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Theory and practice of education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">English language</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Research in English Language Pedagogy</subfield><subfield code="d">Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2012), 2, Seite 20-28</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760602582</subfield><subfield code="x">25384244</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:20-28</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/bc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://relp.khuisf.ac.ir/article_533596_56f796f8c709ddea3a8b01cd22fe0bad.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2588-3259</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2538-4244</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">20-28</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
L - Education |
author |
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi |
spellingShingle |
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi misc LB5-3640 misc PE1-3729 misc Cross-gender studies misc Learning Styles misc Multiple Intelligences misc Theory and practice of education misc English language EFL Male and Female Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences A Case of Iranian EFL University Students |
authorStr |
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760602582 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
LB5-3640 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
25384244 |
topic_title |
LB5-3640 PE1-3729 EFL Male and Female Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences A Case of Iranian EFL University Students Cross-gender studies Learning Styles Multiple Intelligences |
topic |
misc LB5-3640 misc PE1-3729 misc Cross-gender studies misc Learning Styles misc Multiple Intelligences misc Theory and practice of education misc English language |
topic_unstemmed |
misc LB5-3640 misc PE1-3729 misc Cross-gender studies misc Learning Styles misc Multiple Intelligences misc Theory and practice of education misc English language |
topic_browse |
misc LB5-3640 misc PE1-3729 misc Cross-gender studies misc Learning Styles misc Multiple Intelligences misc Theory and practice of education misc English language |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Research in English Language Pedagogy |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1760602582 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Research in English Language Pedagogy |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760602582 |
title |
EFL Male and Female Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences A Case of Iranian EFL University Students |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ028640314 (DE-599)DOAJbc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83 |
title_full |
EFL Male and Female Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences A Case of Iranian EFL University Students |
author_sort |
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi |
journal |
Research in English Language Pedagogy |
journalStr |
Research in English Language Pedagogy |
callnumber-first-code |
L |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2012 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
20 |
author_browse |
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi |
container_volume |
1 |
class |
LB5-3640 PE1-3729 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi |
title_sort |
efl male and female learning styles and multiple intelligences a case of iranian efl university students |
callnumber |
LB5-3640 |
title_auth |
EFL Male and Female Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences A Case of Iranian EFL University Students |
abstract |
This study was an attempt to investigate a learning style and multiple intelligences survey distributed among two groups of senior-level EFL male and female students to use appropriate techniques and activities for different gender. Two standardized instruments were used during the data collection process. It should be noted that a t-test was conducted to conclude the differences between male and female groups. Since there was the same survey as a data elicitation instrument, it was possible to easily compare the results from the two groups. Furthermore, sufficient considerations of both audiences were taken into account during the design of the survey. The first part of the survey aimed at the students’ desired learning styles and the second part focused on multiple intelligences. Data analysis displayed the prevailing learning styles and multiple intelligences in each group. Furthermore, findings revealed that prevailing learning style preferences of the male group were visual, global, closure-oriented, extroverted, and intuitive learning style, respectively, whereas the female group preferred mostly a global, intuitive, closure-oriented, a visual, and finally an extroverted learning style. The findings of the study indicated that knowing the strengths and potentials of the male and female students regarding their multiple intelligences and learning styles would help both language teachers and students in order to make progress, develop language skills, and select appropriate syllabus designs and language learning methods. |
abstractGer |
This study was an attempt to investigate a learning style and multiple intelligences survey distributed among two groups of senior-level EFL male and female students to use appropriate techniques and activities for different gender. Two standardized instruments were used during the data collection process. It should be noted that a t-test was conducted to conclude the differences between male and female groups. Since there was the same survey as a data elicitation instrument, it was possible to easily compare the results from the two groups. Furthermore, sufficient considerations of both audiences were taken into account during the design of the survey. The first part of the survey aimed at the students’ desired learning styles and the second part focused on multiple intelligences. Data analysis displayed the prevailing learning styles and multiple intelligences in each group. Furthermore, findings revealed that prevailing learning style preferences of the male group were visual, global, closure-oriented, extroverted, and intuitive learning style, respectively, whereas the female group preferred mostly a global, intuitive, closure-oriented, a visual, and finally an extroverted learning style. The findings of the study indicated that knowing the strengths and potentials of the male and female students regarding their multiple intelligences and learning styles would help both language teachers and students in order to make progress, develop language skills, and select appropriate syllabus designs and language learning methods. |
abstract_unstemmed |
This study was an attempt to investigate a learning style and multiple intelligences survey distributed among two groups of senior-level EFL male and female students to use appropriate techniques and activities for different gender. Two standardized instruments were used during the data collection process. It should be noted that a t-test was conducted to conclude the differences between male and female groups. Since there was the same survey as a data elicitation instrument, it was possible to easily compare the results from the two groups. Furthermore, sufficient considerations of both audiences were taken into account during the design of the survey. The first part of the survey aimed at the students’ desired learning styles and the second part focused on multiple intelligences. Data analysis displayed the prevailing learning styles and multiple intelligences in each group. Furthermore, findings revealed that prevailing learning style preferences of the male group were visual, global, closure-oriented, extroverted, and intuitive learning style, respectively, whereas the female group preferred mostly a global, intuitive, closure-oriented, a visual, and finally an extroverted learning style. The findings of the study indicated that knowing the strengths and potentials of the male and female students regarding their multiple intelligences and learning styles would help both language teachers and students in order to make progress, develop language skills, and select appropriate syllabus designs and language learning methods. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
EFL Male and Female Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences A Case of Iranian EFL University Students |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/bc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83 http://relp.khuisf.ac.ir/article_533596_56f796f8c709ddea3a8b01cd22fe0bad.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2588-3259 https://doaj.org/toc/2538-4244 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
1760602582 |
callnumber-subject |
LB - Theory and Practice of Education |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
callnumber-a |
LB5-3640 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T18:40:21.665Z |
_version_ |
1803584297151496192 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ028640314</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307130231.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ028640314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJbc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">LB5-3640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">PE1-3729</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Reza Sadeghi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">EFL Male and Female Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences A Case of Iranian EFL University Students</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study was an attempt to investigate a learning style and multiple intelligences survey distributed among two groups of senior-level EFL male and female students to use appropriate techniques and activities for different gender. Two standardized instruments were used during the data collection process. It should be noted that a t-test was conducted to conclude the differences between male and female groups. Since there was the same survey as a data elicitation instrument, it was possible to easily compare the results from the two groups. Furthermore, sufficient considerations of both audiences were taken into account during the design of the survey. The first part of the survey aimed at the students’ desired learning styles and the second part focused on multiple intelligences. Data analysis displayed the prevailing learning styles and multiple intelligences in each group. Furthermore, findings revealed that prevailing learning style preferences of the male group were visual, global, closure-oriented, extroverted, and intuitive learning style, respectively, whereas the female group preferred mostly a global, intuitive, closure-oriented, a visual, and finally an extroverted learning style. The findings of the study indicated that knowing the strengths and potentials of the male and female students regarding their multiple intelligences and learning styles would help both language teachers and students in order to make progress, develop language skills, and select appropriate syllabus designs and language learning methods.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cross-gender studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Learning Styles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multiple Intelligences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Theory and practice of education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">English language</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Research in English Language Pedagogy</subfield><subfield code="d">Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2012), 2, Seite 20-28</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760602582</subfield><subfield code="x">25384244</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:20-28</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/bc3ebe9185374b4eb283d341dfe44b83</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://relp.khuisf.ac.ir/article_533596_56f796f8c709ddea3a8b01cd22fe0bad.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2588-3259</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2538-4244</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">20-28</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4019423 |