Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana

Unregulated harvest of tree bark for medicinal purposes has led to overexploitation and extinction of some valuable tree species. The study assessed bark recovery rates of four medicinal tree species and determined their regenerative abilities, stress shoot production and susceptibility to wood bore...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Issah Mohammed [verfasserIn] Daniel Dompreh [verfasserIn] Akwasi Duah-Gyamfi [verfasserIn] Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey [verfasserIn] Emmanuel Amoah Boakye [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	Borer attack Edge regrowth Medicinal species Sheet regrowth Stress shoot

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Trees, Forests and People - Elsevier, 2020, 8(2022), Seite 100268-
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:8 ; year:2022 ; pages:100268-

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ028806352

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ028806352
003	DE-627
005	20230502155739.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ028806352
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a SD1-669.5
050		0	\|a QK900-989
100	0		\|a Issah Mohammed \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Unregulated harvest of tree bark for medicinal purposes has led to overexploitation and extinction of some valuable tree species. The study assessed bark recovery rates of four medicinal tree species and determined their regenerative abilities, stress shoot production and susceptibility to wood borers. A total of 192 trees of Bombax buonopozense, Mangifera indica, Azadirachta indica and Blighia sapida were randomly selected outside protected forests in the Moist Semi-deciduous (MSD) and Guinea Savannah (GS) ecological zones of Ghana. The trees were harvested using three harvesting intensities, 25%, 50%, and 75% bark removal. Edge and sheet re-growth, stress shoot production and wood borer attack were recorded for each tree in twelfth months. Our results show that the bark of B. buonopozense (29.4% at MSD and 21.4% at GS), M. indica (22.3% at MSD and 16.1% at GS) and A. indica (13.5% at MSD and 12.8% at GS) showed higher regeneration percentage compared to B. sapida (3.8% at MSD and 3.7% at GS), while stress shoot growth percentage was limited to only B. buonopozense (4.7% at MSD and 25% at GS). Though no tree died during the study period, borer attack was recorded for all the species except A. indica. We recommend that forest managers should allow minimum harvesting of B. sapida as they showed slow recovery, while rotation period for repeated harvest can also be prescribed for B. buonopozense and M. indica. Moreover, the coppicing ability of B. buonopozense needs to be examined since it produced a higher number of stress shoots.
650		4	\|a Borer attack
650		4	\|a Edge regrowth
650		4	\|a Medicinal species
650		4	\|a Sheet regrowth
650		4	\|a Stress shoot
653		0	\|a Forestry
653		0	\|a Plant ecology
700	0		\|a Daniel Dompreh \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Akwasi Duah-Gyamfi \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Emmanuel Amoah Boakye \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Trees, Forests and People \|d Elsevier, 2020 \|g 8(2022), Seite 100268- \|w (DE-627)1699003734 \|x 26667193 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:8 \|g year:2022 \|g pages:100268-
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719322000759 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7193 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 8 \|j 2022 \|h 100268-

Indexfelder

author_variant	i m im d d dd a d g adg l k b lkb e a b eab
matchkey_str	article:26667193:2022----::otxliainakeoeyaeosmmdcnl
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
callnumber-subject-code	SD
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028806352 (DE-599)DOAJ7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SD1-669.5 QK900-989 Issah Mohammed verfasserin aut Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Unregulated harvest of tree bark for medicinal purposes has led to overexploitation and extinction of some valuable tree species. The study assessed bark recovery rates of four medicinal tree species and determined their regenerative abilities, stress shoot production and susceptibility to wood borers. A total of 192 trees of Bombax buonopozense, Mangifera indica, Azadirachta indica and Blighia sapida were randomly selected outside protected forests in the Moist Semi-deciduous (MSD) and Guinea Savannah (GS) ecological zones of Ghana. The trees were harvested using three harvesting intensities, 25%, 50%, and 75% bark removal. Edge and sheet re-growth, stress shoot production and wood borer attack were recorded for each tree in twelfth months. Our results show that the bark of B. buonopozense (29.4% at MSD and 21.4% at GS), M. indica (22.3% at MSD and 16.1% at GS) and A. indica (13.5% at MSD and 12.8% at GS) showed higher regeneration percentage compared to B. sapida (3.8% at MSD and 3.7% at GS), while stress shoot growth percentage was limited to only B. buonopozense (4.7% at MSD and 25% at GS). Though no tree died during the study period, borer attack was recorded for all the species except A. indica. We recommend that forest managers should allow minimum harvesting of B. sapida as they showed slow recovery, while rotation period for repeated harvest can also be prescribed for B. buonopozense and M. indica. Moreover, the coppicing ability of B. buonopozense needs to be examined since it produced a higher number of stress shoots. Borer attack Edge regrowth Medicinal species Sheet regrowth Stress shoot Forestry Plant ecology Daniel Dompreh verfasserin aut Akwasi Duah-Gyamfi verfasserin aut Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey verfasserin aut Emmanuel Amoah Boakye verfasserin aut In Trees, Forests and People Elsevier, 2020 8(2022), Seite 100268- (DE-627)1699003734 26667193 nnns volume:8 year:2022 pages:100268- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719322000759 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7193 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2022 100268-
spelling	10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028806352 (DE-599)DOAJ7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SD1-669.5 QK900-989 Issah Mohammed verfasserin aut Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Unregulated harvest of tree bark for medicinal purposes has led to overexploitation and extinction of some valuable tree species. The study assessed bark recovery rates of four medicinal tree species and determined their regenerative abilities, stress shoot production and susceptibility to wood borers. A total of 192 trees of Bombax buonopozense, Mangifera indica, Azadirachta indica and Blighia sapida were randomly selected outside protected forests in the Moist Semi-deciduous (MSD) and Guinea Savannah (GS) ecological zones of Ghana. The trees were harvested using three harvesting intensities, 25%, 50%, and 75% bark removal. Edge and sheet re-growth, stress shoot production and wood borer attack were recorded for each tree in twelfth months. Our results show that the bark of B. buonopozense (29.4% at MSD and 21.4% at GS), M. indica (22.3% at MSD and 16.1% at GS) and A. indica (13.5% at MSD and 12.8% at GS) showed higher regeneration percentage compared to B. sapida (3.8% at MSD and 3.7% at GS), while stress shoot growth percentage was limited to only B. buonopozense (4.7% at MSD and 25% at GS). Though no tree died during the study period, borer attack was recorded for all the species except A. indica. We recommend that forest managers should allow minimum harvesting of B. sapida as they showed slow recovery, while rotation period for repeated harvest can also be prescribed for B. buonopozense and M. indica. Moreover, the coppicing ability of B. buonopozense needs to be examined since it produced a higher number of stress shoots. Borer attack Edge regrowth Medicinal species Sheet regrowth Stress shoot Forestry Plant ecology Daniel Dompreh verfasserin aut Akwasi Duah-Gyamfi verfasserin aut Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey verfasserin aut Emmanuel Amoah Boakye verfasserin aut In Trees, Forests and People Elsevier, 2020 8(2022), Seite 100268- (DE-627)1699003734 26667193 nnns volume:8 year:2022 pages:100268- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719322000759 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7193 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2022 100268-
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028806352 (DE-599)DOAJ7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SD1-669.5 QK900-989 Issah Mohammed verfasserin aut Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Unregulated harvest of tree bark for medicinal purposes has led to overexploitation and extinction of some valuable tree species. The study assessed bark recovery rates of four medicinal tree species and determined their regenerative abilities, stress shoot production and susceptibility to wood borers. A total of 192 trees of Bombax buonopozense, Mangifera indica, Azadirachta indica and Blighia sapida were randomly selected outside protected forests in the Moist Semi-deciduous (MSD) and Guinea Savannah (GS) ecological zones of Ghana. The trees were harvested using three harvesting intensities, 25%, 50%, and 75% bark removal. Edge and sheet re-growth, stress shoot production and wood borer attack were recorded for each tree in twelfth months. Our results show that the bark of B. buonopozense (29.4% at MSD and 21.4% at GS), M. indica (22.3% at MSD and 16.1% at GS) and A. indica (13.5% at MSD and 12.8% at GS) showed higher regeneration percentage compared to B. sapida (3.8% at MSD and 3.7% at GS), while stress shoot growth percentage was limited to only B. buonopozense (4.7% at MSD and 25% at GS). Though no tree died during the study period, borer attack was recorded for all the species except A. indica. We recommend that forest managers should allow minimum harvesting of B. sapida as they showed slow recovery, while rotation period for repeated harvest can also be prescribed for B. buonopozense and M. indica. Moreover, the coppicing ability of B. buonopozense needs to be examined since it produced a higher number of stress shoots. Borer attack Edge regrowth Medicinal species Sheet regrowth Stress shoot Forestry Plant ecology Daniel Dompreh verfasserin aut Akwasi Duah-Gyamfi verfasserin aut Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey verfasserin aut Emmanuel Amoah Boakye verfasserin aut In Trees, Forests and People Elsevier, 2020 8(2022), Seite 100268- (DE-627)1699003734 26667193 nnns volume:8 year:2022 pages:100268- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719322000759 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7193 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2022 100268-
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028806352 (DE-599)DOAJ7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SD1-669.5 QK900-989 Issah Mohammed verfasserin aut Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Unregulated harvest of tree bark for medicinal purposes has led to overexploitation and extinction of some valuable tree species. The study assessed bark recovery rates of four medicinal tree species and determined their regenerative abilities, stress shoot production and susceptibility to wood borers. A total of 192 trees of Bombax buonopozense, Mangifera indica, Azadirachta indica and Blighia sapida were randomly selected outside protected forests in the Moist Semi-deciduous (MSD) and Guinea Savannah (GS) ecological zones of Ghana. The trees were harvested using three harvesting intensities, 25%, 50%, and 75% bark removal. Edge and sheet re-growth, stress shoot production and wood borer attack were recorded for each tree in twelfth months. Our results show that the bark of B. buonopozense (29.4% at MSD and 21.4% at GS), M. indica (22.3% at MSD and 16.1% at GS) and A. indica (13.5% at MSD and 12.8% at GS) showed higher regeneration percentage compared to B. sapida (3.8% at MSD and 3.7% at GS), while stress shoot growth percentage was limited to only B. buonopozense (4.7% at MSD and 25% at GS). Though no tree died during the study period, borer attack was recorded for all the species except A. indica. We recommend that forest managers should allow minimum harvesting of B. sapida as they showed slow recovery, while rotation period for repeated harvest can also be prescribed for B. buonopozense and M. indica. Moreover, the coppicing ability of B. buonopozense needs to be examined since it produced a higher number of stress shoots. Borer attack Edge regrowth Medicinal species Sheet regrowth Stress shoot Forestry Plant ecology Daniel Dompreh verfasserin aut Akwasi Duah-Gyamfi verfasserin aut Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey verfasserin aut Emmanuel Amoah Boakye verfasserin aut In Trees, Forests and People Elsevier, 2020 8(2022), Seite 100268- (DE-627)1699003734 26667193 nnns volume:8 year:2022 pages:100268- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719322000759 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7193 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2022 100268-
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268 doi (DE-627)DOAJ028806352 (DE-599)DOAJ7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SD1-669.5 QK900-989 Issah Mohammed verfasserin aut Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Unregulated harvest of tree bark for medicinal purposes has led to overexploitation and extinction of some valuable tree species. The study assessed bark recovery rates of four medicinal tree species and determined their regenerative abilities, stress shoot production and susceptibility to wood borers. A total of 192 trees of Bombax buonopozense, Mangifera indica, Azadirachta indica and Blighia sapida were randomly selected outside protected forests in the Moist Semi-deciduous (MSD) and Guinea Savannah (GS) ecological zones of Ghana. The trees were harvested using three harvesting intensities, 25%, 50%, and 75% bark removal. Edge and sheet re-growth, stress shoot production and wood borer attack were recorded for each tree in twelfth months. Our results show that the bark of B. buonopozense (29.4% at MSD and 21.4% at GS), M. indica (22.3% at MSD and 16.1% at GS) and A. indica (13.5% at MSD and 12.8% at GS) showed higher regeneration percentage compared to B. sapida (3.8% at MSD and 3.7% at GS), while stress shoot growth percentage was limited to only B. buonopozense (4.7% at MSD and 25% at GS). Though no tree died during the study period, borer attack was recorded for all the species except A. indica. We recommend that forest managers should allow minimum harvesting of B. sapida as they showed slow recovery, while rotation period for repeated harvest can also be prescribed for B. buonopozense and M. indica. Moreover, the coppicing ability of B. buonopozense needs to be examined since it produced a higher number of stress shoots. Borer attack Edge regrowth Medicinal species Sheet regrowth Stress shoot Forestry Plant ecology Daniel Dompreh verfasserin aut Akwasi Duah-Gyamfi verfasserin aut Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey verfasserin aut Emmanuel Amoah Boakye verfasserin aut In Trees, Forests and People Elsevier, 2020 8(2022), Seite 100268- (DE-627)1699003734 26667193 nnns volume:8 year:2022 pages:100268- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719322000759 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7193 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2022 100268-
language	English
source	In Trees, Forests and People 8(2022), Seite 100268- volume:8 year:2022 pages:100268-
sourceStr	In Trees, Forests and People 8(2022), Seite 100268- volume:8 year:2022 pages:100268-
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Borer attack Edge regrowth Medicinal species Sheet regrowth Stress shoot Forestry Plant ecology
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Trees, Forests and People
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Issah Mohammed @@aut@@ Daniel Dompreh @@aut@@ Akwasi Duah-Gyamfi @@aut@@ Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey @@aut@@ Emmanuel Amoah Boakye @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	1699003734
id	DOAJ028806352
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ028806352</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502155739.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ028806352</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SD1-669.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QK900-989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Issah Mohammed</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Unregulated harvest of tree bark for medicinal purposes has led to overexploitation and extinction of some valuable tree species. The study assessed bark recovery rates of four medicinal tree species and determined their regenerative abilities, stress shoot production and susceptibility to wood borers. A total of 192 trees of Bombax buonopozense, Mangifera indica, Azadirachta indica and Blighia sapida were randomly selected outside protected forests in the Moist Semi-deciduous (MSD) and Guinea Savannah (GS) ecological zones of Ghana. The trees were harvested using three harvesting intensities, 25%, 50%, and 75% bark removal. Edge and sheet re-growth, stress shoot production and wood borer attack were recorded for each tree in twelfth months. Our results show that the bark of B. buonopozense (29.4% at MSD and 21.4% at GS), M. indica (22.3% at MSD and 16.1% at GS) and A. indica (13.5% at MSD and 12.8% at GS) showed higher regeneration percentage compared to B. sapida (3.8% at MSD and 3.7% at GS), while stress shoot growth percentage was limited to only B. buonopozense (4.7% at MSD and 25% at GS). Though no tree died during the study period, borer attack was recorded for all the species except A. indica. We recommend that forest managers should allow minimum harvesting of B. sapida as they showed slow recovery, while rotation period for repeated harvest can also be prescribed for B. buonopozense and M. indica. Moreover, the coppicing ability of B. buonopozense needs to be examined since it produced a higher number of stress shoots.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Borer attack</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Edge regrowth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Medicinal species</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sheet regrowth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stress shoot</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Forestry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Plant ecology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daniel Dompreh</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Akwasi Duah-Gyamfi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Emmanuel Amoah Boakye</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Trees, Forests and People</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2022), Seite 100268-</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1699003734</subfield><subfield code="x">26667193</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:100268-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719322000759</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7193</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">100268-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	S - Agriculture
author	Issah Mohammed
spellingShingle	Issah Mohammed misc SD1-669.5 misc QK900-989 misc Borer attack misc Edge regrowth misc Medicinal species misc Sheet regrowth misc Stress shoot misc Forestry misc Plant ecology Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana
authorStr	Issah Mohammed
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)1699003734
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	SD1-669
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	26667193
topic_title	SD1-669.5 QK900-989 Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana Borer attack Edge regrowth Medicinal species Sheet regrowth Stress shoot
topic	misc SD1-669.5 misc QK900-989 misc Borer attack misc Edge regrowth misc Medicinal species misc Sheet regrowth misc Stress shoot misc Forestry misc Plant ecology
topic_unstemmed	misc SD1-669.5 misc QK900-989 misc Borer attack misc Edge regrowth misc Medicinal species misc Sheet regrowth misc Stress shoot misc Forestry misc Plant ecology
topic_browse	misc SD1-669.5 misc QK900-989 misc Borer attack misc Edge regrowth misc Medicinal species misc Sheet regrowth misc Stress shoot misc Forestry misc Plant ecology
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Trees, Forests and People
hierarchy_parent_id	1699003734
hierarchy_top_title	Trees, Forests and People
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)1699003734
title	Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ028806352 (DE-599)DOAJ7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626
title_full	Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana
author_sort	Issah Mohammed
journal	Trees, Forests and People
journalStr	Trees, Forests and People
callnumber-first-code	S
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	100268
author_browse	Issah Mohammed Daniel Dompreh Akwasi Duah-Gyamfi Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey Emmanuel Amoah Boakye
container_volume	8
class	SD1-669.5 QK900-989
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Issah Mohammed
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in ghana
callnumber	SD1-669.5
title_auth	Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana
abstract	Unregulated harvest of tree bark for medicinal purposes has led to overexploitation and extinction of some valuable tree species. The study assessed bark recovery rates of four medicinal tree species and determined their regenerative abilities, stress shoot production and susceptibility to wood borers. A total of 192 trees of Bombax buonopozense, Mangifera indica, Azadirachta indica and Blighia sapida were randomly selected outside protected forests in the Moist Semi-deciduous (MSD) and Guinea Savannah (GS) ecological zones of Ghana. The trees were harvested using three harvesting intensities, 25%, 50%, and 75% bark removal. Edge and sheet re-growth, stress shoot production and wood borer attack were recorded for each tree in twelfth months. Our results show that the bark of B. buonopozense (29.4% at MSD and 21.4% at GS), M. indica (22.3% at MSD and 16.1% at GS) and A. indica (13.5% at MSD and 12.8% at GS) showed higher regeneration percentage compared to B. sapida (3.8% at MSD and 3.7% at GS), while stress shoot growth percentage was limited to only B. buonopozense (4.7% at MSD and 25% at GS). Though no tree died during the study period, borer attack was recorded for all the species except A. indica. We recommend that forest managers should allow minimum harvesting of B. sapida as they showed slow recovery, while rotation period for repeated harvest can also be prescribed for B. buonopozense and M. indica. Moreover, the coppicing ability of B. buonopozense needs to be examined since it produced a higher number of stress shoots.
abstractGer	Unregulated harvest of tree bark for medicinal purposes has led to overexploitation and extinction of some valuable tree species. The study assessed bark recovery rates of four medicinal tree species and determined their regenerative abilities, stress shoot production and susceptibility to wood borers. A total of 192 trees of Bombax buonopozense, Mangifera indica, Azadirachta indica and Blighia sapida were randomly selected outside protected forests in the Moist Semi-deciduous (MSD) and Guinea Savannah (GS) ecological zones of Ghana. The trees were harvested using three harvesting intensities, 25%, 50%, and 75% bark removal. Edge and sheet re-growth, stress shoot production and wood borer attack were recorded for each tree in twelfth months. Our results show that the bark of B. buonopozense (29.4% at MSD and 21.4% at GS), M. indica (22.3% at MSD and 16.1% at GS) and A. indica (13.5% at MSD and 12.8% at GS) showed higher regeneration percentage compared to B. sapida (3.8% at MSD and 3.7% at GS), while stress shoot growth percentage was limited to only B. buonopozense (4.7% at MSD and 25% at GS). Though no tree died during the study period, borer attack was recorded for all the species except A. indica. We recommend that forest managers should allow minimum harvesting of B. sapida as they showed slow recovery, while rotation period for repeated harvest can also be prescribed for B. buonopozense and M. indica. Moreover, the coppicing ability of B. buonopozense needs to be examined since it produced a higher number of stress shoots.
abstract_unstemmed	Unregulated harvest of tree bark for medicinal purposes has led to overexploitation and extinction of some valuable tree species. The study assessed bark recovery rates of four medicinal tree species and determined their regenerative abilities, stress shoot production and susceptibility to wood borers. A total of 192 trees of Bombax buonopozense, Mangifera indica, Azadirachta indica and Blighia sapida were randomly selected outside protected forests in the Moist Semi-deciduous (MSD) and Guinea Savannah (GS) ecological zones of Ghana. The trees were harvested using three harvesting intensities, 25%, 50%, and 75% bark removal. Edge and sheet re-growth, stress shoot production and wood borer attack were recorded for each tree in twelfth months. Our results show that the bark of B. buonopozense (29.4% at MSD and 21.4% at GS), M. indica (22.3% at MSD and 16.1% at GS) and A. indica (13.5% at MSD and 12.8% at GS) showed higher regeneration percentage compared to B. sapida (3.8% at MSD and 3.7% at GS), while stress shoot growth percentage was limited to only B. buonopozense (4.7% at MSD and 25% at GS). Though no tree died during the study period, borer attack was recorded for all the species except A. indica. We recommend that forest managers should allow minimum harvesting of B. sapida as they showed slow recovery, while rotation period for repeated harvest can also be prescribed for B. buonopozense and M. indica. Moreover, the coppicing ability of B. buonopozense needs to be examined since it produced a higher number of stress shoots.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana
url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268 https://doaj.org/article/7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719322000759 https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7193
remote_bool	true
author2	Daniel Dompreh Akwasi Duah-Gyamfi Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey Emmanuel Amoah Boakye
author2Str	Daniel Dompreh Akwasi Duah-Gyamfi Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey Emmanuel Amoah Boakye
ppnlink	1699003734
callnumber-subject	SD - Forestry
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268
callnumber-a	SD1-669.5
up_date	2024-07-03T19:32:17.379Z
_version_	1803587564215468032
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ028806352</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502155739.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ028806352</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SD1-669.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QK900-989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Issah Mohammed</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Unregulated harvest of tree bark for medicinal purposes has led to overexploitation and extinction of some valuable tree species. The study assessed bark recovery rates of four medicinal tree species and determined their regenerative abilities, stress shoot production and susceptibility to wood borers. A total of 192 trees of Bombax buonopozense, Mangifera indica, Azadirachta indica and Blighia sapida were randomly selected outside protected forests in the Moist Semi-deciduous (MSD) and Guinea Savannah (GS) ecological zones of Ghana. The trees were harvested using three harvesting intensities, 25%, 50%, and 75% bark removal. Edge and sheet re-growth, stress shoot production and wood borer attack were recorded for each tree in twelfth months. Our results show that the bark of B. buonopozense (29.4% at MSD and 21.4% at GS), M. indica (22.3% at MSD and 16.1% at GS) and A. indica (13.5% at MSD and 12.8% at GS) showed higher regeneration percentage compared to B. sapida (3.8% at MSD and 3.7% at GS), while stress shoot growth percentage was limited to only B. buonopozense (4.7% at MSD and 25% at GS). Though no tree died during the study period, borer attack was recorded for all the species except A. indica. We recommend that forest managers should allow minimum harvesting of B. sapida as they showed slow recovery, while rotation period for repeated harvest can also be prescribed for B. buonopozense and M. indica. Moreover, the coppicing ability of B. buonopozense needs to be examined since it produced a higher number of stress shoots.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Borer attack</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Edge regrowth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Medicinal species</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sheet regrowth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stress shoot</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Forestry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Plant ecology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daniel Dompreh</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Akwasi Duah-Gyamfi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Emmanuel Amoah Boakye</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Trees, Forests and People</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2022), Seite 100268-</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1699003734</subfield><subfield code="x">26667193</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:100268-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/7059e3cbc8354285a692100c1f8f9626</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719322000759</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7193</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">100268-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4010143

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?