Methoden Komparativer Theologie. Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht

In view of the impossibility of finding neutral categories of comparison, the author pleads for a theological approach to comparative legal research that seeks to shed theological light on the significance of religious law within the respective religion. The comparison would then not be determined b...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Klaus von Stosch [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Deutsch ; Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	komparative theologie tertium comparationis instanz des dritten rechtsästhetik islamisches recht

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Ancilla Iuris - Ancilla Iuris, 2007, (2022), Seite 47-65
Übergeordnetes Werk:	year:2022 ; pages:47-65

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.26031/2022.047

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ029402123

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ029402123
003	DE-627
005	20230307134846.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|ger c
024	7		\|a 10.26031/2022.047 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ029402123
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJa5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a ger \|a eng
050		0	\|a K1-7720
100	0		\|a Klaus von Stosch \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Methoden Komparativer Theologie. Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a In view of the impossibility of finding neutral categories of comparison, the author pleads for a theological approach to comparative legal research that seeks to shed theological light on the significance of religious law within the respective religion. The comparison would then not be determined by neutral categories, but by categories that are derived from the contexts to be compared and determined theologically from there in each case. This procedure gains scientific objectivity through the inclusion of the instance of the third party, which is directed towards the determination of the respective categories in a universal discourse community. With regard to Islamic law, the author recommends an aesthetic approach, which is made visible as a challenge for Christian dogmatic by including contemporary research on legal aesthetics.
650		4	\|a komparative theologie
650		4	\|a tertium comparationis
650		4	\|a instanz des dritten
650		4	\|a rechtsästhetik
650		4	\|a islamisches recht
653		0	\|a Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Ancilla Iuris \|d Ancilla Iuris, 2007 \|g (2022), Seite 47-65 \|w (DE-627)513880135 \|w (DE-600)2240198-2 \|x 16618610 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g year:2022 \|g pages:47-65
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.26031/2022.047 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/a5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.anci.ch/articles/Ancilla2022_47_VonStosch.pdf \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1661-8610 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4753
951			\|a AR
952			\|j 2022 \|h 47-65

Indexfelder

author_variant	k v s kvs
matchkey_str	article:16618610:2022----::ehdnoprtvrhooienflsuiibik
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
callnumber-subject-code	K
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.26031/2022.047 doi (DE-627)DOAJ029402123 (DE-599)DOAJa5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng K1-7720 Klaus von Stosch verfasserin aut Methoden Komparativer Theologie. Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In view of the impossibility of finding neutral categories of comparison, the author pleads for a theological approach to comparative legal research that seeks to shed theological light on the significance of religious law within the respective religion. The comparison would then not be determined by neutral categories, but by categories that are derived from the contexts to be compared and determined theologically from there in each case. This procedure gains scientific objectivity through the inclusion of the instance of the third party, which is directed towards the determination of the respective categories in a universal discourse community. With regard to Islamic law, the author recommends an aesthetic approach, which is made visible as a challenge for Christian dogmatic by including contemporary research on legal aesthetics. komparative theologie tertium comparationis instanz des dritten rechtsästhetik islamisches recht Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence In Ancilla Iuris Ancilla Iuris, 2007 (2022), Seite 47-65 (DE-627)513880135 (DE-600)2240198-2 16618610 nnns year:2022 pages:47-65 https://doi.org/10.26031/2022.047 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc kostenfrei https://www.anci.ch/articles/Ancilla2022_47_VonStosch.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1661-8610 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 2022 47-65
spelling	10.26031/2022.047 doi (DE-627)DOAJ029402123 (DE-599)DOAJa5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng K1-7720 Klaus von Stosch verfasserin aut Methoden Komparativer Theologie. Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In view of the impossibility of finding neutral categories of comparison, the author pleads for a theological approach to comparative legal research that seeks to shed theological light on the significance of religious law within the respective religion. The comparison would then not be determined by neutral categories, but by categories that are derived from the contexts to be compared and determined theologically from there in each case. This procedure gains scientific objectivity through the inclusion of the instance of the third party, which is directed towards the determination of the respective categories in a universal discourse community. With regard to Islamic law, the author recommends an aesthetic approach, which is made visible as a challenge for Christian dogmatic by including contemporary research on legal aesthetics. komparative theologie tertium comparationis instanz des dritten rechtsästhetik islamisches recht Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence In Ancilla Iuris Ancilla Iuris, 2007 (2022), Seite 47-65 (DE-627)513880135 (DE-600)2240198-2 16618610 nnns year:2022 pages:47-65 https://doi.org/10.26031/2022.047 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc kostenfrei https://www.anci.ch/articles/Ancilla2022_47_VonStosch.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1661-8610 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 2022 47-65
allfields_unstemmed	10.26031/2022.047 doi (DE-627)DOAJ029402123 (DE-599)DOAJa5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng K1-7720 Klaus von Stosch verfasserin aut Methoden Komparativer Theologie. Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In view of the impossibility of finding neutral categories of comparison, the author pleads for a theological approach to comparative legal research that seeks to shed theological light on the significance of religious law within the respective religion. The comparison would then not be determined by neutral categories, but by categories that are derived from the contexts to be compared and determined theologically from there in each case. This procedure gains scientific objectivity through the inclusion of the instance of the third party, which is directed towards the determination of the respective categories in a universal discourse community. With regard to Islamic law, the author recommends an aesthetic approach, which is made visible as a challenge for Christian dogmatic by including contemporary research on legal aesthetics. komparative theologie tertium comparationis instanz des dritten rechtsästhetik islamisches recht Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence In Ancilla Iuris Ancilla Iuris, 2007 (2022), Seite 47-65 (DE-627)513880135 (DE-600)2240198-2 16618610 nnns year:2022 pages:47-65 https://doi.org/10.26031/2022.047 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc kostenfrei https://www.anci.ch/articles/Ancilla2022_47_VonStosch.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1661-8610 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 2022 47-65
allfieldsGer	10.26031/2022.047 doi (DE-627)DOAJ029402123 (DE-599)DOAJa5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng K1-7720 Klaus von Stosch verfasserin aut Methoden Komparativer Theologie. Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In view of the impossibility of finding neutral categories of comparison, the author pleads for a theological approach to comparative legal research that seeks to shed theological light on the significance of religious law within the respective religion. The comparison would then not be determined by neutral categories, but by categories that are derived from the contexts to be compared and determined theologically from there in each case. This procedure gains scientific objectivity through the inclusion of the instance of the third party, which is directed towards the determination of the respective categories in a universal discourse community. With regard to Islamic law, the author recommends an aesthetic approach, which is made visible as a challenge for Christian dogmatic by including contemporary research on legal aesthetics. komparative theologie tertium comparationis instanz des dritten rechtsästhetik islamisches recht Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence In Ancilla Iuris Ancilla Iuris, 2007 (2022), Seite 47-65 (DE-627)513880135 (DE-600)2240198-2 16618610 nnns year:2022 pages:47-65 https://doi.org/10.26031/2022.047 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc kostenfrei https://www.anci.ch/articles/Ancilla2022_47_VonStosch.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1661-8610 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 2022 47-65
allfieldsSound	10.26031/2022.047 doi (DE-627)DOAJ029402123 (DE-599)DOAJa5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng K1-7720 Klaus von Stosch verfasserin aut Methoden Komparativer Theologie. Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In view of the impossibility of finding neutral categories of comparison, the author pleads for a theological approach to comparative legal research that seeks to shed theological light on the significance of religious law within the respective religion. The comparison would then not be determined by neutral categories, but by categories that are derived from the contexts to be compared and determined theologically from there in each case. This procedure gains scientific objectivity through the inclusion of the instance of the third party, which is directed towards the determination of the respective categories in a universal discourse community. With regard to Islamic law, the author recommends an aesthetic approach, which is made visible as a challenge for Christian dogmatic by including contemporary research on legal aesthetics. komparative theologie tertium comparationis instanz des dritten rechtsästhetik islamisches recht Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence In Ancilla Iuris Ancilla Iuris, 2007 (2022), Seite 47-65 (DE-627)513880135 (DE-600)2240198-2 16618610 nnns year:2022 pages:47-65 https://doi.org/10.26031/2022.047 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc kostenfrei https://www.anci.ch/articles/Ancilla2022_47_VonStosch.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1661-8610 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 2022 47-65
language	German English
source	In Ancilla Iuris (2022), Seite 47-65 year:2022 pages:47-65
sourceStr	In Ancilla Iuris (2022), Seite 47-65 year:2022 pages:47-65
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	komparative theologie tertium comparationis instanz des dritten rechtsästhetik islamisches recht Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Ancilla Iuris
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Klaus von Stosch @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	513880135
id	DOAJ029402123
language_de	deutsch englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ029402123</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307134846.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|ger c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.26031/2022.047</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ029402123</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJa5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ger</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K1-7720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Klaus von Stosch</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Methoden Komparativer Theologie. Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In view of the impossibility of finding neutral categories of comparison, the author pleads for a theological approach to comparative legal research that seeks to shed theological light on the significance of religious law within the respective religion. The comparison would then not be determined by neutral categories, but by categories that are derived from the contexts to be compared and determined theologically from there in each case. This procedure gains scientific objectivity through the inclusion of the instance of the third party, which is directed towards the determination of the respective categories in a universal discourse community. With regard to Islamic law, the author recommends an aesthetic approach, which is made visible as a challenge for Christian dogmatic by including contemporary research on legal aesthetics.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">komparative theologie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">tertium comparationis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">instanz des dritten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">rechtsästhetik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">islamisches recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Ancilla Iuris</subfield><subfield code="d">Ancilla Iuris, 2007</subfield><subfield code="g">(2022), Seite 47-65</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)513880135</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2240198-2</subfield><subfield code="x">16618610</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:47-65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.26031/2022.047</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/a5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.anci.ch/articles/Ancilla2022_47_VonStosch.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1661-8610</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4753</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">47-65</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	K - Law
author	Klaus von Stosch
spellingShingle	Klaus von Stosch misc K1-7720 misc komparative theologie misc tertium comparationis misc instanz des dritten misc rechtsästhetik misc islamisches recht misc Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence Methoden Komparativer Theologie. Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht
authorStr	Klaus von Stosch
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)513880135
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	K1-7720
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	16618610
topic_title	K1-7720 Methoden Komparativer Theologie. Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht komparative theologie tertium comparationis instanz des dritten rechtsästhetik islamisches recht
topic	misc K1-7720 misc komparative theologie misc tertium comparationis misc instanz des dritten misc rechtsästhetik misc islamisches recht misc Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
topic_unstemmed	misc K1-7720 misc komparative theologie misc tertium comparationis misc instanz des dritten misc rechtsästhetik misc islamisches recht misc Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
topic_browse	misc K1-7720 misc komparative theologie misc tertium comparationis misc instanz des dritten misc rechtsästhetik misc islamisches recht misc Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Ancilla Iuris
hierarchy_parent_id	513880135
hierarchy_top_title	Ancilla Iuris
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)513880135 (DE-600)2240198-2
title	Methoden Komparativer Theologie. Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ029402123 (DE-599)DOAJa5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc
title_full	Methoden Komparativer Theologie. Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht
author_sort	Klaus von Stosch
journal	Ancilla Iuris
journalStr	Ancilla Iuris
callnumber-first-code	K
lang_code	ger eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	47
author_browse	Klaus von Stosch
class	K1-7720
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Klaus von Stosch
doi_str_mv	10.26031/2022.047
title_sort	methoden komparativer theologie. eine fallstudie im blick auf das islamische recht
callnumber	K1-7720
title_auth	Methoden Komparativer Theologie. Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht
abstract	In view of the impossibility of finding neutral categories of comparison, the author pleads for a theological approach to comparative legal research that seeks to shed theological light on the significance of religious law within the respective religion. The comparison would then not be determined by neutral categories, but by categories that are derived from the contexts to be compared and determined theologically from there in each case. This procedure gains scientific objectivity through the inclusion of the instance of the third party, which is directed towards the determination of the respective categories in a universal discourse community. With regard to Islamic law, the author recommends an aesthetic approach, which is made visible as a challenge for Christian dogmatic by including contemporary research on legal aesthetics.
abstractGer	In view of the impossibility of finding neutral categories of comparison, the author pleads for a theological approach to comparative legal research that seeks to shed theological light on the significance of religious law within the respective religion. The comparison would then not be determined by neutral categories, but by categories that are derived from the contexts to be compared and determined theologically from there in each case. This procedure gains scientific objectivity through the inclusion of the instance of the third party, which is directed towards the determination of the respective categories in a universal discourse community. With regard to Islamic law, the author recommends an aesthetic approach, which is made visible as a challenge for Christian dogmatic by including contemporary research on legal aesthetics.
abstract_unstemmed	In view of the impossibility of finding neutral categories of comparison, the author pleads for a theological approach to comparative legal research that seeks to shed theological light on the significance of religious law within the respective religion. The comparison would then not be determined by neutral categories, but by categories that are derived from the contexts to be compared and determined theologically from there in each case. This procedure gains scientific objectivity through the inclusion of the instance of the third party, which is directed towards the determination of the respective categories in a universal discourse community. With regard to Islamic law, the author recommends an aesthetic approach, which is made visible as a challenge for Christian dogmatic by including contemporary research on legal aesthetics.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753
title_short	Methoden Komparativer Theologie. Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht
url	https://doi.org/10.26031/2022.047 https://doaj.org/article/a5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc https://www.anci.ch/articles/Ancilla2022_47_VonStosch.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1661-8610
remote_bool	true
ppnlink	513880135
callnumber-subject	K - General Law
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.26031/2022.047
callnumber-a	K1-7720
up_date	2024-07-03T22:42:47.895Z
_version_	1803599549980213249
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ029402123</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307134846.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|ger c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.26031/2022.047</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ029402123</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJa5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ger</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K1-7720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Klaus von Stosch</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Methoden Komparativer Theologie. Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In view of the impossibility of finding neutral categories of comparison, the author pleads for a theological approach to comparative legal research that seeks to shed theological light on the significance of religious law within the respective religion. The comparison would then not be determined by neutral categories, but by categories that are derived from the contexts to be compared and determined theologically from there in each case. This procedure gains scientific objectivity through the inclusion of the instance of the third party, which is directed towards the determination of the respective categories in a universal discourse community. With regard to Islamic law, the author recommends an aesthetic approach, which is made visible as a challenge for Christian dogmatic by including contemporary research on legal aesthetics.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">komparative theologie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">tertium comparationis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">instanz des dritten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">rechtsästhetik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">islamisches recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Ancilla Iuris</subfield><subfield code="d">Ancilla Iuris, 2007</subfield><subfield code="g">(2022), Seite 47-65</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)513880135</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2240198-2</subfield><subfield code="x">16618610</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:47-65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.26031/2022.047</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/a5b686c0c3794796971f39d46b6765cc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.anci.ch/articles/Ancilla2022_47_VonStosch.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1661-8610</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4753</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">47-65</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3998165

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Methoden Komparativer Theologie. Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?