The Magnitude and “Peanuts” Effects: Searching Implications

The framework of this paper is the field of decision-making processes in which people face the choice between probabilistic and dated rewards. Traditionally, the preferences for probabilistic outcomes have been analyzed by the Expected Utility (EU) model whilst the preferences for dated rewards have...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Salvador Cruz Rambaud [verfasserIn] Ana M. Sánchez Pérez [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2018

Schlagwörter:	intertemporal choice discounted utility model expected utility model magnitude effect “peanuts” effect

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics - Frontiers Media S.A., 2016, 4(2018)
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:4 ; year:2018

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3389/fams.2018.00036

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ029752019

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ029752019
003	DE-627
005	20230307140708.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3389/fams.2018.00036 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ029752019
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a T57-57.97
050		0	\|a QA273-280
100	0		\|a Salvador Cruz Rambaud \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	4	\|a The Magnitude and “Peanuts” Effects: Searching Implications
264		1	\|c 2018
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The framework of this paper is the field of decision-making processes in which people face the choice between probabilistic and dated rewards. Traditionally, the preferences for probabilistic outcomes have been analyzed by the Expected Utility (EU) model whilst the preferences for dated rewards have been studied by the Discounted Utility (DU) model. Nevertheless, recent empirical findings have revealed the existence of several anomalies or paradoxes in both contexts. Specifically, EU and DU models exhibit an anomaly affecting the amount of the reward, viz the “peanuts” and the magnitude effects, respectively, which seem to go in opposite directions. The aim of this paper is to analyze both effects jointly in a wide setting involving choices subject to risk and over a period of time, and thereby identify and consider the implications of one anomaly on the other.
650		4	\|a intertemporal choice
650		4	\|a discounted utility model
650		4	\|a expected utility model
650		4	\|a magnitude effect
650		4	\|a “peanuts” effect
653		0	\|a Applied mathematics. Quantitative methods
653		0	\|a Probabilities. Mathematical statistics
700	0		\|a Ana M. Sánchez Pérez \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics \|d Frontiers Media S.A., 2016 \|g 4(2018) \|w (DE-627)82702956X \|w (DE-600)2823454-6 \|x 22974687 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:4 \|g year:2018
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2018.00036 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fams.2018.00036/full \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2297-4687 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 4 \|j 2018

Indexfelder

author_variant	s c r scr a m s p amsp
matchkey_str	article:22974687:2018----::hmgiuenpausfetsaci
hierarchy_sort_str	2018
callnumber-subject-code	T
publishDate	2018
allfields	10.3389/fams.2018.00036 doi (DE-627)DOAJ029752019 (DE-599)DOAJ444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng T57-57.97 QA273-280 Salvador Cruz Rambaud verfasserin aut The Magnitude and “Peanuts” Effects: Searching Implications 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The framework of this paper is the field of decision-making processes in which people face the choice between probabilistic and dated rewards. Traditionally, the preferences for probabilistic outcomes have been analyzed by the Expected Utility (EU) model whilst the preferences for dated rewards have been studied by the Discounted Utility (DU) model. Nevertheless, recent empirical findings have revealed the existence of several anomalies or paradoxes in both contexts. Specifically, EU and DU models exhibit an anomaly affecting the amount of the reward, viz the “peanuts” and the magnitude effects, respectively, which seem to go in opposite directions. The aim of this paper is to analyze both effects jointly in a wide setting involving choices subject to risk and over a period of time, and thereby identify and consider the implications of one anomaly on the other. intertemporal choice discounted utility model expected utility model magnitude effect “peanuts” effect Applied mathematics. Quantitative methods Probabilities. Mathematical statistics Ana M. Sánchez Pérez verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics Frontiers Media S.A., 2016 4(2018) (DE-627)82702956X (DE-600)2823454-6 22974687 nnns volume:4 year:2018 https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2018.00036 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fams.2018.00036/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2297-4687 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2018
spelling	10.3389/fams.2018.00036 doi (DE-627)DOAJ029752019 (DE-599)DOAJ444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng T57-57.97 QA273-280 Salvador Cruz Rambaud verfasserin aut The Magnitude and “Peanuts” Effects: Searching Implications 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The framework of this paper is the field of decision-making processes in which people face the choice between probabilistic and dated rewards. Traditionally, the preferences for probabilistic outcomes have been analyzed by the Expected Utility (EU) model whilst the preferences for dated rewards have been studied by the Discounted Utility (DU) model. Nevertheless, recent empirical findings have revealed the existence of several anomalies or paradoxes in both contexts. Specifically, EU and DU models exhibit an anomaly affecting the amount of the reward, viz the “peanuts” and the magnitude effects, respectively, which seem to go in opposite directions. The aim of this paper is to analyze both effects jointly in a wide setting involving choices subject to risk and over a period of time, and thereby identify and consider the implications of one anomaly on the other. intertemporal choice discounted utility model expected utility model magnitude effect “peanuts” effect Applied mathematics. Quantitative methods Probabilities. Mathematical statistics Ana M. Sánchez Pérez verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics Frontiers Media S.A., 2016 4(2018) (DE-627)82702956X (DE-600)2823454-6 22974687 nnns volume:4 year:2018 https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2018.00036 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fams.2018.00036/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2297-4687 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2018
allfields_unstemmed	10.3389/fams.2018.00036 doi (DE-627)DOAJ029752019 (DE-599)DOAJ444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng T57-57.97 QA273-280 Salvador Cruz Rambaud verfasserin aut The Magnitude and “Peanuts” Effects: Searching Implications 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The framework of this paper is the field of decision-making processes in which people face the choice between probabilistic and dated rewards. Traditionally, the preferences for probabilistic outcomes have been analyzed by the Expected Utility (EU) model whilst the preferences for dated rewards have been studied by the Discounted Utility (DU) model. Nevertheless, recent empirical findings have revealed the existence of several anomalies or paradoxes in both contexts. Specifically, EU and DU models exhibit an anomaly affecting the amount of the reward, viz the “peanuts” and the magnitude effects, respectively, which seem to go in opposite directions. The aim of this paper is to analyze both effects jointly in a wide setting involving choices subject to risk and over a period of time, and thereby identify and consider the implications of one anomaly on the other. intertemporal choice discounted utility model expected utility model magnitude effect “peanuts” effect Applied mathematics. Quantitative methods Probabilities. Mathematical statistics Ana M. Sánchez Pérez verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics Frontiers Media S.A., 2016 4(2018) (DE-627)82702956X (DE-600)2823454-6 22974687 nnns volume:4 year:2018 https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2018.00036 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fams.2018.00036/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2297-4687 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2018
allfieldsGer	10.3389/fams.2018.00036 doi (DE-627)DOAJ029752019 (DE-599)DOAJ444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng T57-57.97 QA273-280 Salvador Cruz Rambaud verfasserin aut The Magnitude and “Peanuts” Effects: Searching Implications 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The framework of this paper is the field of decision-making processes in which people face the choice between probabilistic and dated rewards. Traditionally, the preferences for probabilistic outcomes have been analyzed by the Expected Utility (EU) model whilst the preferences for dated rewards have been studied by the Discounted Utility (DU) model. Nevertheless, recent empirical findings have revealed the existence of several anomalies or paradoxes in both contexts. Specifically, EU and DU models exhibit an anomaly affecting the amount of the reward, viz the “peanuts” and the magnitude effects, respectively, which seem to go in opposite directions. The aim of this paper is to analyze both effects jointly in a wide setting involving choices subject to risk and over a period of time, and thereby identify and consider the implications of one anomaly on the other. intertemporal choice discounted utility model expected utility model magnitude effect “peanuts” effect Applied mathematics. Quantitative methods Probabilities. Mathematical statistics Ana M. Sánchez Pérez verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics Frontiers Media S.A., 2016 4(2018) (DE-627)82702956X (DE-600)2823454-6 22974687 nnns volume:4 year:2018 https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2018.00036 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fams.2018.00036/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2297-4687 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2018
allfieldsSound	10.3389/fams.2018.00036 doi (DE-627)DOAJ029752019 (DE-599)DOAJ444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng T57-57.97 QA273-280 Salvador Cruz Rambaud verfasserin aut The Magnitude and “Peanuts” Effects: Searching Implications 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The framework of this paper is the field of decision-making processes in which people face the choice between probabilistic and dated rewards. Traditionally, the preferences for probabilistic outcomes have been analyzed by the Expected Utility (EU) model whilst the preferences for dated rewards have been studied by the Discounted Utility (DU) model. Nevertheless, recent empirical findings have revealed the existence of several anomalies or paradoxes in both contexts. Specifically, EU and DU models exhibit an anomaly affecting the amount of the reward, viz the “peanuts” and the magnitude effects, respectively, which seem to go in opposite directions. The aim of this paper is to analyze both effects jointly in a wide setting involving choices subject to risk and over a period of time, and thereby identify and consider the implications of one anomaly on the other. intertemporal choice discounted utility model expected utility model magnitude effect “peanuts” effect Applied mathematics. Quantitative methods Probabilities. Mathematical statistics Ana M. Sánchez Pérez verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics Frontiers Media S.A., 2016 4(2018) (DE-627)82702956X (DE-600)2823454-6 22974687 nnns volume:4 year:2018 https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2018.00036 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fams.2018.00036/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2297-4687 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2018
language	English
source	In Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics 4(2018) volume:4 year:2018
sourceStr	In Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics 4(2018) volume:4 year:2018
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	intertemporal choice discounted utility model expected utility model magnitude effect “peanuts” effect Applied mathematics. Quantitative methods Probabilities. Mathematical statistics
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Salvador Cruz Rambaud @@aut@@ Ana M. Sánchez Pérez @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	82702956X
id	DOAJ029752019
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ029752019</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307140708.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/fams.2018.00036</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ029752019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T57-57.97</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QA273-280</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salvador Cruz Rambaud</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Magnitude and “Peanuts” Effects: Searching Implications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The framework of this paper is the field of decision-making processes in which people face the choice between probabilistic and dated rewards. Traditionally, the preferences for probabilistic outcomes have been analyzed by the Expected Utility (EU) model whilst the preferences for dated rewards have been studied by the Discounted Utility (DU) model. Nevertheless, recent empirical findings have revealed the existence of several anomalies or paradoxes in both contexts. Specifically, EU and DU models exhibit an anomaly affecting the amount of the reward, viz the “peanuts” and the magnitude effects, respectively, which seem to go in opposite directions. The aim of this paper is to analyze both effects jointly in a wide setting involving choices subject to risk and over a period of time, and thereby identify and consider the implications of one anomaly on the other.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">intertemporal choice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">discounted utility model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">expected utility model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">magnitude effect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">“peanuts” effect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Applied mathematics. Quantitative methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Probabilities. Mathematical statistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ana M. Sánchez Pérez</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2018)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)82702956X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2823454-6</subfield><subfield code="x">22974687</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2018.00036</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fams.2018.00036/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2297-4687</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	T - Technology
author	Salvador Cruz Rambaud
spellingShingle	Salvador Cruz Rambaud misc T57-57.97 misc QA273-280 misc intertemporal choice misc discounted utility model misc expected utility model misc magnitude effect misc “peanuts” effect misc Applied mathematics. Quantitative methods misc Probabilities. Mathematical statistics The Magnitude and “Peanuts” Effects: Searching Implications
authorStr	Salvador Cruz Rambaud
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)82702956X
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	T57-57
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	22974687
topic_title	T57-57.97 QA273-280 The Magnitude and “Peanuts” Effects: Searching Implications intertemporal choice discounted utility model expected utility model magnitude effect “peanuts” effect
topic	misc T57-57.97 misc QA273-280 misc intertemporal choice misc discounted utility model misc expected utility model misc magnitude effect misc “peanuts” effect misc Applied mathematics. Quantitative methods misc Probabilities. Mathematical statistics
topic_unstemmed	misc T57-57.97 misc QA273-280 misc intertemporal choice misc discounted utility model misc expected utility model misc magnitude effect misc “peanuts” effect misc Applied mathematics. Quantitative methods misc Probabilities. Mathematical statistics
topic_browse	misc T57-57.97 misc QA273-280 misc intertemporal choice misc discounted utility model misc expected utility model misc magnitude effect misc “peanuts” effect misc Applied mathematics. Quantitative methods misc Probabilities. Mathematical statistics
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
hierarchy_parent_id	82702956X
hierarchy_top_title	Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)82702956X (DE-600)2823454-6
title	The Magnitude and “Peanuts” Effects: Searching Implications
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ029752019 (DE-599)DOAJ444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e
title_full	The Magnitude and “Peanuts” Effects: Searching Implications
author_sort	Salvador Cruz Rambaud
journal	Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
journalStr	Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
callnumber-first-code	T
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2018
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Salvador Cruz Rambaud Ana M. Sánchez Pérez
container_volume	4
class	T57-57.97 QA273-280
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Salvador Cruz Rambaud
doi_str_mv	10.3389/fams.2018.00036
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	magnitude and “peanuts” effects: searching implications
callnumber	T57-57.97
title_auth	The Magnitude and “Peanuts” Effects: Searching Implications
abstract	The framework of this paper is the field of decision-making processes in which people face the choice between probabilistic and dated rewards. Traditionally, the preferences for probabilistic outcomes have been analyzed by the Expected Utility (EU) model whilst the preferences for dated rewards have been studied by the Discounted Utility (DU) model. Nevertheless, recent empirical findings have revealed the existence of several anomalies or paradoxes in both contexts. Specifically, EU and DU models exhibit an anomaly affecting the amount of the reward, viz the “peanuts” and the magnitude effects, respectively, which seem to go in opposite directions. The aim of this paper is to analyze both effects jointly in a wide setting involving choices subject to risk and over a period of time, and thereby identify and consider the implications of one anomaly on the other.
abstractGer	The framework of this paper is the field of decision-making processes in which people face the choice between probabilistic and dated rewards. Traditionally, the preferences for probabilistic outcomes have been analyzed by the Expected Utility (EU) model whilst the preferences for dated rewards have been studied by the Discounted Utility (DU) model. Nevertheless, recent empirical findings have revealed the existence of several anomalies or paradoxes in both contexts. Specifically, EU and DU models exhibit an anomaly affecting the amount of the reward, viz the “peanuts” and the magnitude effects, respectively, which seem to go in opposite directions. The aim of this paper is to analyze both effects jointly in a wide setting involving choices subject to risk and over a period of time, and thereby identify and consider the implications of one anomaly on the other.
abstract_unstemmed	The framework of this paper is the field of decision-making processes in which people face the choice between probabilistic and dated rewards. Traditionally, the preferences for probabilistic outcomes have been analyzed by the Expected Utility (EU) model whilst the preferences for dated rewards have been studied by the Discounted Utility (DU) model. Nevertheless, recent empirical findings have revealed the existence of several anomalies or paradoxes in both contexts. Specifically, EU and DU models exhibit an anomaly affecting the amount of the reward, viz the “peanuts” and the magnitude effects, respectively, which seem to go in opposite directions. The aim of this paper is to analyze both effects jointly in a wide setting involving choices subject to risk and over a period of time, and thereby identify and consider the implications of one anomaly on the other.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	The Magnitude and “Peanuts” Effects: Searching Implications
url	https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2018.00036 https://doaj.org/article/444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fams.2018.00036/full https://doaj.org/toc/2297-4687
remote_bool	true
author2	Ana M. Sánchez Pérez
author2Str	Ana M. Sánchez Pérez
ppnlink	82702956X
callnumber-subject	T - General Technology
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3389/fams.2018.00036
callnumber-a	T57-57.97
up_date	2024-07-04T00:15:07.755Z
_version_	1803605358950744064
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ029752019</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307140708.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/fams.2018.00036</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ029752019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T57-57.97</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QA273-280</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salvador Cruz Rambaud</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Magnitude and “Peanuts” Effects: Searching Implications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The framework of this paper is the field of decision-making processes in which people face the choice between probabilistic and dated rewards. Traditionally, the preferences for probabilistic outcomes have been analyzed by the Expected Utility (EU) model whilst the preferences for dated rewards have been studied by the Discounted Utility (DU) model. Nevertheless, recent empirical findings have revealed the existence of several anomalies or paradoxes in both contexts. Specifically, EU and DU models exhibit an anomaly affecting the amount of the reward, viz the “peanuts” and the magnitude effects, respectively, which seem to go in opposite directions. The aim of this paper is to analyze both effects jointly in a wide setting involving choices subject to risk and over a period of time, and thereby identify and consider the implications of one anomaly on the other.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">intertemporal choice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">discounted utility model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">expected utility model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">magnitude effect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">“peanuts” effect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Applied mathematics. Quantitative methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Probabilities. Mathematical statistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ana M. Sánchez Pérez</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2018)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)82702956X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2823454-6</subfield><subfield code="x">22974687</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2018.00036</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/444ea90c4d1f4e1fb66111bfe9b6b36e</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fams.2018.00036/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2297-4687</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4010057

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

The Magnitude and “Peanuts” Effects: Searching Implications

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?