Evaluation of comparative hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non-organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice
Objectives: The study was carried out to compare hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice. Materials and Methods: In vivo hepatoprotective activity of methanol extracts of organic and non-organic Camelia sinensis extracts (200 and 400...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Dipendra Khadka [verfasserIn] Pramod Aryal [verfasserIn] Daya Ram Parajuli [verfasserIn] Anita Shah [verfasserIn] Narayan Gautam [verfasserIn] Shailendra Dhakal [verfasserIn] Bal Krishna Adhikari [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences - Al Ameen Medical College, 2019, 12(2019), 03, Seite 127-133 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:12 ; year:2019 ; number:03 ; pages:127-133 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ031835406 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ031835406 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230307163055.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230226s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ031835406 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJaa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a RM1-950 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a RA1190-1270 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Dipendra Khadka |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation of comparative hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non-organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Objectives: The study was carried out to compare hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice. Materials and Methods: In vivo hepatoprotective activity of methanol extracts of organic and non-organic Camelia sinensis extracts (200 and 400 mg/kg) were evaluated using experimental CCl4 induced toxicity model. The mice were divided into seven group (n=6). The mice were administered once daily with 10% DMSO (negative control), 25 mg/kg Silymarin (positive control), organic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) and nonorganic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) for seven days followed by the hepatotoxicity induction using carbontetrachloride. The blood samples were collected and subjected to biochemical analysis. In addition, histopathological examination of the hepatocytes was performed to observe any damage in a cellular level. Ballooning degeneration, cytic necrosis, confluent necrosis, submassive necrosis, micro and macro vesicular steatosis, lymphocyte infiltration were observed in the treatment and CCl4 induced toxicity model. Results: Severe hepatic damage due to CCl4 was indicated by significant increase in the liver enzymes level including Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransaminase (ALT) and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP). The elevated levels of these enzymes were reduced in a dose-dependent manner in biochemical analysis by the organic and nonorganic tea methanol extracts. The reduction of liver enzymes level is better in organic treated mice than that of non-organic treated mice. Mice injected with CCl4 have ballooning degeneration with confluent necrosis along with mixed infiltration of inflammatory cells which represents that the liver is highly injured. However, the organic extracts treated mice showed potent hepatoprotective effect with minimal focal ballooning degeneration indicating that the hepatocytes morphology resembling towards normal. Interestingly, the non-organic extracts showed a hepatoprotective effect but there are massive micro-vesicular steatosis and focal lymphocytes. We found a superior hepatoprotective activity of organic extracts than that of non-organic extracts. The liver injury produced by CCl4 has been reversed by the Silymarin which is the positive control in the experiment. Conclusion: The study revealed that the hepatoprotective activity of organic Camelia sinensis is better than the non organic Camelia sinensis. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Camelia sinensis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hepatoprotective activity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Organic tea | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Biochemical analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hepatotoxicity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Carbontetrachloride | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Toxicology. Poisons | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Pramod Aryal |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Daya Ram Parajuli |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Anita Shah |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Narayan Gautam |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Shailendra Dhakal |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Bal Krishna Adhikari |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences |d Al Ameen Medical College, 2019 |g 12(2019), 03, Seite 127-133 |w (DE-627)1760608491 |x 09741143 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2019 |g number:03 |g pages:127-133 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/aa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://ajms.alameenmedical.org/ArticlePDFs/5%20AJMS%20V12.N3.2019%20p%20127-133.pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 12 |j 2019 |e 03 |h 127-133 | ||
| author_variant |
d k dk p a pa d r p drp a s as n g ng s d sd b k a bka |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:09741143:2019----::vlainfoprtvhptpoetvatvtoogncessoogncaeisnn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
RM |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ031835406 (DE-599)DOAJaa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RM1-950 RA1190-1270 Dipendra Khadka verfasserin aut Evaluation of comparative hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non-organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: The study was carried out to compare hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice. Materials and Methods: In vivo hepatoprotective activity of methanol extracts of organic and non-organic Camelia sinensis extracts (200 and 400 mg/kg) were evaluated using experimental CCl4 induced toxicity model. The mice were divided into seven group (n=6). The mice were administered once daily with 10% DMSO (negative control), 25 mg/kg Silymarin (positive control), organic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) and nonorganic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) for seven days followed by the hepatotoxicity induction using carbontetrachloride. The blood samples were collected and subjected to biochemical analysis. In addition, histopathological examination of the hepatocytes was performed to observe any damage in a cellular level. Ballooning degeneration, cytic necrosis, confluent necrosis, submassive necrosis, micro and macro vesicular steatosis, lymphocyte infiltration were observed in the treatment and CCl4 induced toxicity model. Results: Severe hepatic damage due to CCl4 was indicated by significant increase in the liver enzymes level including Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransaminase (ALT) and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP). The elevated levels of these enzymes were reduced in a dose-dependent manner in biochemical analysis by the organic and nonorganic tea methanol extracts. The reduction of liver enzymes level is better in organic treated mice than that of non-organic treated mice. Mice injected with CCl4 have ballooning degeneration with confluent necrosis along with mixed infiltration of inflammatory cells which represents that the liver is highly injured. However, the organic extracts treated mice showed potent hepatoprotective effect with minimal focal ballooning degeneration indicating that the hepatocytes morphology resembling towards normal. Interestingly, the non-organic extracts showed a hepatoprotective effect but there are massive micro-vesicular steatosis and focal lymphocytes. We found a superior hepatoprotective activity of organic extracts than that of non-organic extracts. The liver injury produced by CCl4 has been reversed by the Silymarin which is the positive control in the experiment. Conclusion: The study revealed that the hepatoprotective activity of organic Camelia sinensis is better than the non organic Camelia sinensis. Camelia sinensis Hepatoprotective activity Organic tea Biochemical analysis Hepatotoxicity Carbontetrachloride Therapeutics. Pharmacology Toxicology. Poisons Pramod Aryal verfasserin aut Daya Ram Parajuli verfasserin aut Anita Shah verfasserin aut Narayan Gautam verfasserin aut Shailendra Dhakal verfasserin aut Bal Krishna Adhikari verfasserin aut In Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences Al Ameen Medical College, 2019 12(2019), 03, Seite 127-133 (DE-627)1760608491 09741143 nnns volume:12 year:2019 number:03 pages:127-133 https://doaj.org/article/aa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683 kostenfrei http://ajms.alameenmedical.org/ArticlePDFs/5%20AJMS%20V12.N3.2019%20p%20127-133.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 12 2019 03 127-133 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ031835406 (DE-599)DOAJaa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RM1-950 RA1190-1270 Dipendra Khadka verfasserin aut Evaluation of comparative hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non-organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: The study was carried out to compare hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice. Materials and Methods: In vivo hepatoprotective activity of methanol extracts of organic and non-organic Camelia sinensis extracts (200 and 400 mg/kg) were evaluated using experimental CCl4 induced toxicity model. The mice were divided into seven group (n=6). The mice were administered once daily with 10% DMSO (negative control), 25 mg/kg Silymarin (positive control), organic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) and nonorganic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) for seven days followed by the hepatotoxicity induction using carbontetrachloride. The blood samples were collected and subjected to biochemical analysis. In addition, histopathological examination of the hepatocytes was performed to observe any damage in a cellular level. Ballooning degeneration, cytic necrosis, confluent necrosis, submassive necrosis, micro and macro vesicular steatosis, lymphocyte infiltration were observed in the treatment and CCl4 induced toxicity model. Results: Severe hepatic damage due to CCl4 was indicated by significant increase in the liver enzymes level including Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransaminase (ALT) and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP). The elevated levels of these enzymes were reduced in a dose-dependent manner in biochemical analysis by the organic and nonorganic tea methanol extracts. The reduction of liver enzymes level is better in organic treated mice than that of non-organic treated mice. Mice injected with CCl4 have ballooning degeneration with confluent necrosis along with mixed infiltration of inflammatory cells which represents that the liver is highly injured. However, the organic extracts treated mice showed potent hepatoprotective effect with minimal focal ballooning degeneration indicating that the hepatocytes morphology resembling towards normal. Interestingly, the non-organic extracts showed a hepatoprotective effect but there are massive micro-vesicular steatosis and focal lymphocytes. We found a superior hepatoprotective activity of organic extracts than that of non-organic extracts. The liver injury produced by CCl4 has been reversed by the Silymarin which is the positive control in the experiment. Conclusion: The study revealed that the hepatoprotective activity of organic Camelia sinensis is better than the non organic Camelia sinensis. Camelia sinensis Hepatoprotective activity Organic tea Biochemical analysis Hepatotoxicity Carbontetrachloride Therapeutics. Pharmacology Toxicology. Poisons Pramod Aryal verfasserin aut Daya Ram Parajuli verfasserin aut Anita Shah verfasserin aut Narayan Gautam verfasserin aut Shailendra Dhakal verfasserin aut Bal Krishna Adhikari verfasserin aut In Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences Al Ameen Medical College, 2019 12(2019), 03, Seite 127-133 (DE-627)1760608491 09741143 nnns volume:12 year:2019 number:03 pages:127-133 https://doaj.org/article/aa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683 kostenfrei http://ajms.alameenmedical.org/ArticlePDFs/5%20AJMS%20V12.N3.2019%20p%20127-133.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 12 2019 03 127-133 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ031835406 (DE-599)DOAJaa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RM1-950 RA1190-1270 Dipendra Khadka verfasserin aut Evaluation of comparative hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non-organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: The study was carried out to compare hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice. Materials and Methods: In vivo hepatoprotective activity of methanol extracts of organic and non-organic Camelia sinensis extracts (200 and 400 mg/kg) were evaluated using experimental CCl4 induced toxicity model. The mice were divided into seven group (n=6). The mice were administered once daily with 10% DMSO (negative control), 25 mg/kg Silymarin (positive control), organic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) and nonorganic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) for seven days followed by the hepatotoxicity induction using carbontetrachloride. The blood samples were collected and subjected to biochemical analysis. In addition, histopathological examination of the hepatocytes was performed to observe any damage in a cellular level. Ballooning degeneration, cytic necrosis, confluent necrosis, submassive necrosis, micro and macro vesicular steatosis, lymphocyte infiltration were observed in the treatment and CCl4 induced toxicity model. Results: Severe hepatic damage due to CCl4 was indicated by significant increase in the liver enzymes level including Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransaminase (ALT) and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP). The elevated levels of these enzymes were reduced in a dose-dependent manner in biochemical analysis by the organic and nonorganic tea methanol extracts. The reduction of liver enzymes level is better in organic treated mice than that of non-organic treated mice. Mice injected with CCl4 have ballooning degeneration with confluent necrosis along with mixed infiltration of inflammatory cells which represents that the liver is highly injured. However, the organic extracts treated mice showed potent hepatoprotective effect with minimal focal ballooning degeneration indicating that the hepatocytes morphology resembling towards normal. Interestingly, the non-organic extracts showed a hepatoprotective effect but there are massive micro-vesicular steatosis and focal lymphocytes. We found a superior hepatoprotective activity of organic extracts than that of non-organic extracts. The liver injury produced by CCl4 has been reversed by the Silymarin which is the positive control in the experiment. Conclusion: The study revealed that the hepatoprotective activity of organic Camelia sinensis is better than the non organic Camelia sinensis. Camelia sinensis Hepatoprotective activity Organic tea Biochemical analysis Hepatotoxicity Carbontetrachloride Therapeutics. Pharmacology Toxicology. Poisons Pramod Aryal verfasserin aut Daya Ram Parajuli verfasserin aut Anita Shah verfasserin aut Narayan Gautam verfasserin aut Shailendra Dhakal verfasserin aut Bal Krishna Adhikari verfasserin aut In Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences Al Ameen Medical College, 2019 12(2019), 03, Seite 127-133 (DE-627)1760608491 09741143 nnns volume:12 year:2019 number:03 pages:127-133 https://doaj.org/article/aa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683 kostenfrei http://ajms.alameenmedical.org/ArticlePDFs/5%20AJMS%20V12.N3.2019%20p%20127-133.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 12 2019 03 127-133 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ031835406 (DE-599)DOAJaa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RM1-950 RA1190-1270 Dipendra Khadka verfasserin aut Evaluation of comparative hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non-organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: The study was carried out to compare hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice. Materials and Methods: In vivo hepatoprotective activity of methanol extracts of organic and non-organic Camelia sinensis extracts (200 and 400 mg/kg) were evaluated using experimental CCl4 induced toxicity model. The mice were divided into seven group (n=6). The mice were administered once daily with 10% DMSO (negative control), 25 mg/kg Silymarin (positive control), organic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) and nonorganic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) for seven days followed by the hepatotoxicity induction using carbontetrachloride. The blood samples were collected and subjected to biochemical analysis. In addition, histopathological examination of the hepatocytes was performed to observe any damage in a cellular level. Ballooning degeneration, cytic necrosis, confluent necrosis, submassive necrosis, micro and macro vesicular steatosis, lymphocyte infiltration were observed in the treatment and CCl4 induced toxicity model. Results: Severe hepatic damage due to CCl4 was indicated by significant increase in the liver enzymes level including Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransaminase (ALT) and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP). The elevated levels of these enzymes were reduced in a dose-dependent manner in biochemical analysis by the organic and nonorganic tea methanol extracts. The reduction of liver enzymes level is better in organic treated mice than that of non-organic treated mice. Mice injected with CCl4 have ballooning degeneration with confluent necrosis along with mixed infiltration of inflammatory cells which represents that the liver is highly injured. However, the organic extracts treated mice showed potent hepatoprotective effect with minimal focal ballooning degeneration indicating that the hepatocytes morphology resembling towards normal. Interestingly, the non-organic extracts showed a hepatoprotective effect but there are massive micro-vesicular steatosis and focal lymphocytes. We found a superior hepatoprotective activity of organic extracts than that of non-organic extracts. The liver injury produced by CCl4 has been reversed by the Silymarin which is the positive control in the experiment. Conclusion: The study revealed that the hepatoprotective activity of organic Camelia sinensis is better than the non organic Camelia sinensis. Camelia sinensis Hepatoprotective activity Organic tea Biochemical analysis Hepatotoxicity Carbontetrachloride Therapeutics. Pharmacology Toxicology. Poisons Pramod Aryal verfasserin aut Daya Ram Parajuli verfasserin aut Anita Shah verfasserin aut Narayan Gautam verfasserin aut Shailendra Dhakal verfasserin aut Bal Krishna Adhikari verfasserin aut In Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences Al Ameen Medical College, 2019 12(2019), 03, Seite 127-133 (DE-627)1760608491 09741143 nnns volume:12 year:2019 number:03 pages:127-133 https://doaj.org/article/aa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683 kostenfrei http://ajms.alameenmedical.org/ArticlePDFs/5%20AJMS%20V12.N3.2019%20p%20127-133.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 12 2019 03 127-133 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ031835406 (DE-599)DOAJaa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RM1-950 RA1190-1270 Dipendra Khadka verfasserin aut Evaluation of comparative hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non-organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: The study was carried out to compare hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice. Materials and Methods: In vivo hepatoprotective activity of methanol extracts of organic and non-organic Camelia sinensis extracts (200 and 400 mg/kg) were evaluated using experimental CCl4 induced toxicity model. The mice were divided into seven group (n=6). The mice were administered once daily with 10% DMSO (negative control), 25 mg/kg Silymarin (positive control), organic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) and nonorganic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) for seven days followed by the hepatotoxicity induction using carbontetrachloride. The blood samples were collected and subjected to biochemical analysis. In addition, histopathological examination of the hepatocytes was performed to observe any damage in a cellular level. Ballooning degeneration, cytic necrosis, confluent necrosis, submassive necrosis, micro and macro vesicular steatosis, lymphocyte infiltration were observed in the treatment and CCl4 induced toxicity model. Results: Severe hepatic damage due to CCl4 was indicated by significant increase in the liver enzymes level including Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransaminase (ALT) and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP). The elevated levels of these enzymes were reduced in a dose-dependent manner in biochemical analysis by the organic and nonorganic tea methanol extracts. The reduction of liver enzymes level is better in organic treated mice than that of non-organic treated mice. Mice injected with CCl4 have ballooning degeneration with confluent necrosis along with mixed infiltration of inflammatory cells which represents that the liver is highly injured. However, the organic extracts treated mice showed potent hepatoprotective effect with minimal focal ballooning degeneration indicating that the hepatocytes morphology resembling towards normal. Interestingly, the non-organic extracts showed a hepatoprotective effect but there are massive micro-vesicular steatosis and focal lymphocytes. We found a superior hepatoprotective activity of organic extracts than that of non-organic extracts. The liver injury produced by CCl4 has been reversed by the Silymarin which is the positive control in the experiment. Conclusion: The study revealed that the hepatoprotective activity of organic Camelia sinensis is better than the non organic Camelia sinensis. Camelia sinensis Hepatoprotective activity Organic tea Biochemical analysis Hepatotoxicity Carbontetrachloride Therapeutics. Pharmacology Toxicology. Poisons Pramod Aryal verfasserin aut Daya Ram Parajuli verfasserin aut Anita Shah verfasserin aut Narayan Gautam verfasserin aut Shailendra Dhakal verfasserin aut Bal Krishna Adhikari verfasserin aut In Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences Al Ameen Medical College, 2019 12(2019), 03, Seite 127-133 (DE-627)1760608491 09741143 nnns volume:12 year:2019 number:03 pages:127-133 https://doaj.org/article/aa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683 kostenfrei http://ajms.alameenmedical.org/ArticlePDFs/5%20AJMS%20V12.N3.2019%20p%20127-133.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 12 2019 03 127-133 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences 12(2019), 03, Seite 127-133 volume:12 year:2019 number:03 pages:127-133 |
| sourceStr |
In Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences 12(2019), 03, Seite 127-133 volume:12 year:2019 number:03 pages:127-133 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Camelia sinensis Hepatoprotective activity Organic tea Biochemical analysis Hepatotoxicity Carbontetrachloride Therapeutics. Pharmacology Toxicology. Poisons |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Dipendra Khadka @@aut@@ Pramod Aryal @@aut@@ Daya Ram Parajuli @@aut@@ Anita Shah @@aut@@ Narayan Gautam @@aut@@ Shailendra Dhakal @@aut@@ Bal Krishna Adhikari @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760608491 |
| id |
DOAJ031835406 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ031835406</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307163055.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ031835406</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJaa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RM1-950</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RA1190-1270</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dipendra Khadka</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of comparative hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non-organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives: The study was carried out to compare hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice. Materials and Methods: In vivo hepatoprotective activity of methanol extracts of organic and non-organic Camelia sinensis extracts (200 and 400 mg/kg) were evaluated using experimental CCl4 induced toxicity model. The mice were divided into seven group (n=6). The mice were administered once daily with 10% DMSO (negative control), 25 mg/kg Silymarin (positive control), organic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) and nonorganic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) for seven days followed by the hepatotoxicity induction using carbontetrachloride. The blood samples were collected and subjected to biochemical analysis. In addition, histopathological examination of the hepatocytes was performed to observe any damage in a cellular level. Ballooning degeneration, cytic necrosis, confluent necrosis, submassive necrosis, micro and macro vesicular steatosis, lymphocyte infiltration were observed in the treatment and CCl4 induced toxicity model. Results: Severe hepatic damage due to CCl4 was indicated by significant increase in the liver enzymes level including Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransaminase (ALT) and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP). The elevated levels of these enzymes were reduced in a dose-dependent manner in biochemical analysis by the organic and nonorganic tea methanol extracts. The reduction of liver enzymes level is better in organic treated mice than that of non-organic treated mice. Mice injected with CCl4 have ballooning degeneration with confluent necrosis along with mixed infiltration of inflammatory cells which represents that the liver is highly injured. However, the organic extracts treated mice showed potent hepatoprotective effect with minimal focal ballooning degeneration indicating that the hepatocytes morphology resembling towards normal. Interestingly, the non-organic extracts showed a hepatoprotective effect but there are massive micro-vesicular steatosis and focal lymphocytes. We found a superior hepatoprotective activity of organic extracts than that of non-organic extracts. The liver injury produced by CCl4 has been reversed by the Silymarin which is the positive control in the experiment. Conclusion: The study revealed that the hepatoprotective activity of organic Camelia sinensis is better than the non organic Camelia sinensis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Camelia sinensis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hepatoprotective activity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Organic tea</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biochemical analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hepatotoxicity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Carbontetrachloride</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Therapeutics. Pharmacology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Toxicology. Poisons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pramod Aryal</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daya Ram Parajuli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anita Shah</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Narayan Gautam</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shailendra Dhakal</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bal Krishna Adhikari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences</subfield><subfield code="d">Al Ameen Medical College, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2019), 03, Seite 127-133</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760608491</subfield><subfield code="x">09741143</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:127-133</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/aa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://ajms.alameenmedical.org/ArticlePDFs/5%20AJMS%20V12.N3.2019%20p%20127-133.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">03</subfield><subfield code="h">127-133</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
| author |
Dipendra Khadka |
| spellingShingle |
Dipendra Khadka misc RM1-950 misc RA1190-1270 misc Camelia sinensis misc Hepatoprotective activity misc Organic tea misc Biochemical analysis misc Hepatotoxicity misc Carbontetrachloride misc Therapeutics. Pharmacology misc Toxicology. Poisons Evaluation of comparative hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non-organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice |
| authorStr |
Dipendra Khadka |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760608491 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
RM1-950 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
09741143 |
| topic_title |
RM1-950 RA1190-1270 Evaluation of comparative hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non-organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice Camelia sinensis Hepatoprotective activity Organic tea Biochemical analysis Hepatotoxicity Carbontetrachloride |
| topic |
misc RM1-950 misc RA1190-1270 misc Camelia sinensis misc Hepatoprotective activity misc Organic tea misc Biochemical analysis misc Hepatotoxicity misc Carbontetrachloride misc Therapeutics. Pharmacology misc Toxicology. Poisons |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc RM1-950 misc RA1190-1270 misc Camelia sinensis misc Hepatoprotective activity misc Organic tea misc Biochemical analysis misc Hepatotoxicity misc Carbontetrachloride misc Therapeutics. Pharmacology misc Toxicology. Poisons |
| topic_browse |
misc RM1-950 misc RA1190-1270 misc Camelia sinensis misc Hepatoprotective activity misc Organic tea misc Biochemical analysis misc Hepatotoxicity misc Carbontetrachloride misc Therapeutics. Pharmacology misc Toxicology. Poisons |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760608491 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760608491 |
| title |
Evaluation of comparative hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non-organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ031835406 (DE-599)DOAJaa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683 |
| title_full |
Evaluation of comparative hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non-organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice |
| author_sort |
Dipendra Khadka |
| journal |
Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences |
| journalStr |
Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences |
| callnumber-first-code |
R |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
127 |
| author_browse |
Dipendra Khadka Pramod Aryal Daya Ram Parajuli Anita Shah Narayan Gautam Shailendra Dhakal Bal Krishna Adhikari |
| container_volume |
12 |
| class |
RM1-950 RA1190-1270 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Dipendra Khadka |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
evaluation of comparative hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non-organic camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice |
| callnumber |
RM1-950 |
| title_auth |
Evaluation of comparative hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non-organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice |
| abstract |
Objectives: The study was carried out to compare hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice. Materials and Methods: In vivo hepatoprotective activity of methanol extracts of organic and non-organic Camelia sinensis extracts (200 and 400 mg/kg) were evaluated using experimental CCl4 induced toxicity model. The mice were divided into seven group (n=6). The mice were administered once daily with 10% DMSO (negative control), 25 mg/kg Silymarin (positive control), organic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) and nonorganic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) for seven days followed by the hepatotoxicity induction using carbontetrachloride. The blood samples were collected and subjected to biochemical analysis. In addition, histopathological examination of the hepatocytes was performed to observe any damage in a cellular level. Ballooning degeneration, cytic necrosis, confluent necrosis, submassive necrosis, micro and macro vesicular steatosis, lymphocyte infiltration were observed in the treatment and CCl4 induced toxicity model. Results: Severe hepatic damage due to CCl4 was indicated by significant increase in the liver enzymes level including Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransaminase (ALT) and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP). The elevated levels of these enzymes were reduced in a dose-dependent manner in biochemical analysis by the organic and nonorganic tea methanol extracts. The reduction of liver enzymes level is better in organic treated mice than that of non-organic treated mice. Mice injected with CCl4 have ballooning degeneration with confluent necrosis along with mixed infiltration of inflammatory cells which represents that the liver is highly injured. However, the organic extracts treated mice showed potent hepatoprotective effect with minimal focal ballooning degeneration indicating that the hepatocytes morphology resembling towards normal. Interestingly, the non-organic extracts showed a hepatoprotective effect but there are massive micro-vesicular steatosis and focal lymphocytes. We found a superior hepatoprotective activity of organic extracts than that of non-organic extracts. The liver injury produced by CCl4 has been reversed by the Silymarin which is the positive control in the experiment. Conclusion: The study revealed that the hepatoprotective activity of organic Camelia sinensis is better than the non organic Camelia sinensis. |
| abstractGer |
Objectives: The study was carried out to compare hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice. Materials and Methods: In vivo hepatoprotective activity of methanol extracts of organic and non-organic Camelia sinensis extracts (200 and 400 mg/kg) were evaluated using experimental CCl4 induced toxicity model. The mice were divided into seven group (n=6). The mice were administered once daily with 10% DMSO (negative control), 25 mg/kg Silymarin (positive control), organic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) and nonorganic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) for seven days followed by the hepatotoxicity induction using carbontetrachloride. The blood samples were collected and subjected to biochemical analysis. In addition, histopathological examination of the hepatocytes was performed to observe any damage in a cellular level. Ballooning degeneration, cytic necrosis, confluent necrosis, submassive necrosis, micro and macro vesicular steatosis, lymphocyte infiltration were observed in the treatment and CCl4 induced toxicity model. Results: Severe hepatic damage due to CCl4 was indicated by significant increase in the liver enzymes level including Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransaminase (ALT) and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP). The elevated levels of these enzymes were reduced in a dose-dependent manner in biochemical analysis by the organic and nonorganic tea methanol extracts. The reduction of liver enzymes level is better in organic treated mice than that of non-organic treated mice. Mice injected with CCl4 have ballooning degeneration with confluent necrosis along with mixed infiltration of inflammatory cells which represents that the liver is highly injured. However, the organic extracts treated mice showed potent hepatoprotective effect with minimal focal ballooning degeneration indicating that the hepatocytes morphology resembling towards normal. Interestingly, the non-organic extracts showed a hepatoprotective effect but there are massive micro-vesicular steatosis and focal lymphocytes. We found a superior hepatoprotective activity of organic extracts than that of non-organic extracts. The liver injury produced by CCl4 has been reversed by the Silymarin which is the positive control in the experiment. Conclusion: The study revealed that the hepatoprotective activity of organic Camelia sinensis is better than the non organic Camelia sinensis. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Objectives: The study was carried out to compare hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice. Materials and Methods: In vivo hepatoprotective activity of methanol extracts of organic and non-organic Camelia sinensis extracts (200 and 400 mg/kg) were evaluated using experimental CCl4 induced toxicity model. The mice were divided into seven group (n=6). The mice were administered once daily with 10% DMSO (negative control), 25 mg/kg Silymarin (positive control), organic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) and nonorganic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) for seven days followed by the hepatotoxicity induction using carbontetrachloride. The blood samples were collected and subjected to biochemical analysis. In addition, histopathological examination of the hepatocytes was performed to observe any damage in a cellular level. Ballooning degeneration, cytic necrosis, confluent necrosis, submassive necrosis, micro and macro vesicular steatosis, lymphocyte infiltration were observed in the treatment and CCl4 induced toxicity model. Results: Severe hepatic damage due to CCl4 was indicated by significant increase in the liver enzymes level including Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransaminase (ALT) and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP). The elevated levels of these enzymes were reduced in a dose-dependent manner in biochemical analysis by the organic and nonorganic tea methanol extracts. The reduction of liver enzymes level is better in organic treated mice than that of non-organic treated mice. Mice injected with CCl4 have ballooning degeneration with confluent necrosis along with mixed infiltration of inflammatory cells which represents that the liver is highly injured. However, the organic extracts treated mice showed potent hepatoprotective effect with minimal focal ballooning degeneration indicating that the hepatocytes morphology resembling towards normal. Interestingly, the non-organic extracts showed a hepatoprotective effect but there are massive micro-vesicular steatosis and focal lymphocytes. We found a superior hepatoprotective activity of organic extracts than that of non-organic extracts. The liver injury produced by CCl4 has been reversed by the Silymarin which is the positive control in the experiment. Conclusion: The study revealed that the hepatoprotective activity of organic Camelia sinensis is better than the non organic Camelia sinensis. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
03 |
| title_short |
Evaluation of comparative hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non-organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/aa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683 http://ajms.alameenmedical.org/ArticlePDFs/5%20AJMS%20V12.N3.2019%20p%20127-133.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Pramod Aryal Daya Ram Parajuli Anita Shah Narayan Gautam Shailendra Dhakal Bal Krishna Adhikari |
| author2Str |
Pramod Aryal Daya Ram Parajuli Anita Shah Narayan Gautam Shailendra Dhakal Bal Krishna Adhikari |
| ppnlink |
1760608491 |
| callnumber-subject |
RM - Therapeutics and Pharmacology |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| callnumber-a |
RM1-950 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T22:41:55.690Z |
| _version_ |
1803599495239303168 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ031835406</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307163055.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ031835406</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJaa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RM1-950</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RA1190-1270</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dipendra Khadka</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of comparative hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non-organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives: The study was carried out to compare hepatoprotective activity of organic versus non organic Camelia sinensis methanol extracts in albino mice. Materials and Methods: In vivo hepatoprotective activity of methanol extracts of organic and non-organic Camelia sinensis extracts (200 and 400 mg/kg) were evaluated using experimental CCl4 induced toxicity model. The mice were divided into seven group (n=6). The mice were administered once daily with 10% DMSO (negative control), 25 mg/kg Silymarin (positive control), organic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) and nonorganic tea methanol extracts (200mg/kg, 400mg/kg) for seven days followed by the hepatotoxicity induction using carbontetrachloride. The blood samples were collected and subjected to biochemical analysis. In addition, histopathological examination of the hepatocytes was performed to observe any damage in a cellular level. Ballooning degeneration, cytic necrosis, confluent necrosis, submassive necrosis, micro and macro vesicular steatosis, lymphocyte infiltration were observed in the treatment and CCl4 induced toxicity model. Results: Severe hepatic damage due to CCl4 was indicated by significant increase in the liver enzymes level including Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransaminase (ALT) and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP). The elevated levels of these enzymes were reduced in a dose-dependent manner in biochemical analysis by the organic and nonorganic tea methanol extracts. The reduction of liver enzymes level is better in organic treated mice than that of non-organic treated mice. Mice injected with CCl4 have ballooning degeneration with confluent necrosis along with mixed infiltration of inflammatory cells which represents that the liver is highly injured. However, the organic extracts treated mice showed potent hepatoprotective effect with minimal focal ballooning degeneration indicating that the hepatocytes morphology resembling towards normal. Interestingly, the non-organic extracts showed a hepatoprotective effect but there are massive micro-vesicular steatosis and focal lymphocytes. We found a superior hepatoprotective activity of organic extracts than that of non-organic extracts. The liver injury produced by CCl4 has been reversed by the Silymarin which is the positive control in the experiment. Conclusion: The study revealed that the hepatoprotective activity of organic Camelia sinensis is better than the non organic Camelia sinensis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Camelia sinensis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hepatoprotective activity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Organic tea</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biochemical analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hepatotoxicity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Carbontetrachloride</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Therapeutics. Pharmacology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Toxicology. Poisons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pramod Aryal</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daya Ram Parajuli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anita Shah</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Narayan Gautam</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shailendra Dhakal</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bal Krishna Adhikari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences</subfield><subfield code="d">Al Ameen Medical College, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2019), 03, Seite 127-133</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760608491</subfield><subfield code="x">09741143</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:127-133</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/aa482bafb7474c8e8cc31fa3dc99b683</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://ajms.alameenmedical.org/ArticlePDFs/5%20AJMS%20V12.N3.2019%20p%20127-133.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1143</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">03</subfield><subfield code="h">127-133</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4000015 |