Airspace Operation Effectiveness Evaluation Based on q-Rung Orthopair Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy GRA and TOPSIS

In order to improve the ability of airspace management, a multi-attribute decision-making tool based on q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy GRA-TOPSIS is proposed to solve the problem of airspace operation effectiveness evaluation; this is in view of the fact that there are few airspace oper...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Zhiyuan Chen [verfasserIn] Di Shen [verfasserIn] Yaojun Ren [verfasserIn] Fuping Yu [verfasserIn] Xiujiu Yuan [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	airspace operation effectiveness multi-attribute decision-making q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set GRA method TOPSIS method

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Symmetry - MDPI AG, 2009, 14(2022), 2, p 242
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:14 ; year:2022 ; number:2, p 242

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3390/sym14020242

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ03269752X

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ03269752X
003	DE-627
005	20240414182519.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3390/sym14020242 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ03269752X
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJb0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a QA1-939
100	0		\|a Zhiyuan Chen \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Airspace Operation Effectiveness Evaluation Based on q-Rung Orthopair Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy GRA and TOPSIS
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a In order to improve the ability of airspace management, a multi-attribute decision-making tool based on q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy GRA-TOPSIS is proposed to solve the problem of airspace operation effectiveness evaluation; this is in view of the fact that there are few airspace operation effectiveness evaluation methods in general aviation airports. Firstly, taking general aviation airports as the research object, a complete airspace operation effectiveness evaluation system is newly established, its evaluation indicators are introduced, and its multi-attribute decision-making ideas are explained. Then, based on the q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy set, a new distance measure and information aggregation operator are defined, which can better deal with symmetry information. Secondly, we build a deviation maximization model to calculate the attribute weights of indicator elements in the decision-making process. Then, we combine the GRA method and TOPSIS method to rank the airspace operation effectiveness evaluation schemes. Finally, combined with calculation examples and comparative analysis, the reliability and rationality of the method proposed in this paper are verified, and the symmetry relationship between the evaluation results and the actual situation is better reflected. Experiments show that the method proposed in this paper can obtain more accurate airspace operation effectiveness evaluation results, and can provide reference for related research.
650		4	\|a airspace operation effectiveness
650		4	\|a multi-attribute decision-making
650		4	\|a q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set
650		4	\|a GRA method
650		4	\|a TOPSIS method
653		0	\|a Mathematics
700	0		\|a Di Shen \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yaojun Ren \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Fuping Yu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Xiujiu Yuan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Symmetry \|d MDPI AG, 2009 \|g 14(2022), 2, p 242 \|w (DE-627)610604112 \|w (DE-600)2518382-5 \|x 20738994 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:14 \|g year:2022 \|g number:2, p 242
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020242 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/b0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/2/242 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 14 \|j 2022 \|e 2, p 242

Indexfelder

author_variant	z c zc d s ds y r yr f y fy x y xy
matchkey_str	article:20738994:2022----::isaeprtoefcieesvlainaeoqugrhpipoaiit
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
callnumber-subject-code	QA
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.3390/sym14020242 doi (DE-627)DOAJ03269752X (DE-599)DOAJb0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QA1-939 Zhiyuan Chen verfasserin aut Airspace Operation Effectiveness Evaluation Based on q-Rung Orthopair Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy GRA and TOPSIS 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In order to improve the ability of airspace management, a multi-attribute decision-making tool based on q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy GRA-TOPSIS is proposed to solve the problem of airspace operation effectiveness evaluation; this is in view of the fact that there are few airspace operation effectiveness evaluation methods in general aviation airports. Firstly, taking general aviation airports as the research object, a complete airspace operation effectiveness evaluation system is newly established, its evaluation indicators are introduced, and its multi-attribute decision-making ideas are explained. Then, based on the q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy set, a new distance measure and information aggregation operator are defined, which can better deal with symmetry information. Secondly, we build a deviation maximization model to calculate the attribute weights of indicator elements in the decision-making process. Then, we combine the GRA method and TOPSIS method to rank the airspace operation effectiveness evaluation schemes. Finally, combined with calculation examples and comparative analysis, the reliability and rationality of the method proposed in this paper are verified, and the symmetry relationship between the evaluation results and the actual situation is better reflected. Experiments show that the method proposed in this paper can obtain more accurate airspace operation effectiveness evaluation results, and can provide reference for related research. airspace operation effectiveness multi-attribute decision-making q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set GRA method TOPSIS method Mathematics Di Shen verfasserin aut Yaojun Ren verfasserin aut Fuping Yu verfasserin aut Xiujiu Yuan verfasserin aut In Symmetry MDPI AG, 2009 14(2022), 2, p 242 (DE-627)610604112 (DE-600)2518382-5 20738994 nnns volume:14 year:2022 number:2, p 242 https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020242 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/2/242 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2022 2, p 242
spelling	10.3390/sym14020242 doi (DE-627)DOAJ03269752X (DE-599)DOAJb0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QA1-939 Zhiyuan Chen verfasserin aut Airspace Operation Effectiveness Evaluation Based on q-Rung Orthopair Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy GRA and TOPSIS 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In order to improve the ability of airspace management, a multi-attribute decision-making tool based on q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy GRA-TOPSIS is proposed to solve the problem of airspace operation effectiveness evaluation; this is in view of the fact that there are few airspace operation effectiveness evaluation methods in general aviation airports. Firstly, taking general aviation airports as the research object, a complete airspace operation effectiveness evaluation system is newly established, its evaluation indicators are introduced, and its multi-attribute decision-making ideas are explained. Then, based on the q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy set, a new distance measure and information aggregation operator are defined, which can better deal with symmetry information. Secondly, we build a deviation maximization model to calculate the attribute weights of indicator elements in the decision-making process. Then, we combine the GRA method and TOPSIS method to rank the airspace operation effectiveness evaluation schemes. Finally, combined with calculation examples and comparative analysis, the reliability and rationality of the method proposed in this paper are verified, and the symmetry relationship between the evaluation results and the actual situation is better reflected. Experiments show that the method proposed in this paper can obtain more accurate airspace operation effectiveness evaluation results, and can provide reference for related research. airspace operation effectiveness multi-attribute decision-making q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set GRA method TOPSIS method Mathematics Di Shen verfasserin aut Yaojun Ren verfasserin aut Fuping Yu verfasserin aut Xiujiu Yuan verfasserin aut In Symmetry MDPI AG, 2009 14(2022), 2, p 242 (DE-627)610604112 (DE-600)2518382-5 20738994 nnns volume:14 year:2022 number:2, p 242 https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020242 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/2/242 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2022 2, p 242
allfields_unstemmed	10.3390/sym14020242 doi (DE-627)DOAJ03269752X (DE-599)DOAJb0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QA1-939 Zhiyuan Chen verfasserin aut Airspace Operation Effectiveness Evaluation Based on q-Rung Orthopair Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy GRA and TOPSIS 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In order to improve the ability of airspace management, a multi-attribute decision-making tool based on q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy GRA-TOPSIS is proposed to solve the problem of airspace operation effectiveness evaluation; this is in view of the fact that there are few airspace operation effectiveness evaluation methods in general aviation airports. Firstly, taking general aviation airports as the research object, a complete airspace operation effectiveness evaluation system is newly established, its evaluation indicators are introduced, and its multi-attribute decision-making ideas are explained. Then, based on the q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy set, a new distance measure and information aggregation operator are defined, which can better deal with symmetry information. Secondly, we build a deviation maximization model to calculate the attribute weights of indicator elements in the decision-making process. Then, we combine the GRA method and TOPSIS method to rank the airspace operation effectiveness evaluation schemes. Finally, combined with calculation examples and comparative analysis, the reliability and rationality of the method proposed in this paper are verified, and the symmetry relationship between the evaluation results and the actual situation is better reflected. Experiments show that the method proposed in this paper can obtain more accurate airspace operation effectiveness evaluation results, and can provide reference for related research. airspace operation effectiveness multi-attribute decision-making q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set GRA method TOPSIS method Mathematics Di Shen verfasserin aut Yaojun Ren verfasserin aut Fuping Yu verfasserin aut Xiujiu Yuan verfasserin aut In Symmetry MDPI AG, 2009 14(2022), 2, p 242 (DE-627)610604112 (DE-600)2518382-5 20738994 nnns volume:14 year:2022 number:2, p 242 https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020242 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/2/242 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2022 2, p 242
allfieldsGer	10.3390/sym14020242 doi (DE-627)DOAJ03269752X (DE-599)DOAJb0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QA1-939 Zhiyuan Chen verfasserin aut Airspace Operation Effectiveness Evaluation Based on q-Rung Orthopair Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy GRA and TOPSIS 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In order to improve the ability of airspace management, a multi-attribute decision-making tool based on q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy GRA-TOPSIS is proposed to solve the problem of airspace operation effectiveness evaluation; this is in view of the fact that there are few airspace operation effectiveness evaluation methods in general aviation airports. Firstly, taking general aviation airports as the research object, a complete airspace operation effectiveness evaluation system is newly established, its evaluation indicators are introduced, and its multi-attribute decision-making ideas are explained. Then, based on the q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy set, a new distance measure and information aggregation operator are defined, which can better deal with symmetry information. Secondly, we build a deviation maximization model to calculate the attribute weights of indicator elements in the decision-making process. Then, we combine the GRA method and TOPSIS method to rank the airspace operation effectiveness evaluation schemes. Finally, combined with calculation examples and comparative analysis, the reliability and rationality of the method proposed in this paper are verified, and the symmetry relationship between the evaluation results and the actual situation is better reflected. Experiments show that the method proposed in this paper can obtain more accurate airspace operation effectiveness evaluation results, and can provide reference for related research. airspace operation effectiveness multi-attribute decision-making q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set GRA method TOPSIS method Mathematics Di Shen verfasserin aut Yaojun Ren verfasserin aut Fuping Yu verfasserin aut Xiujiu Yuan verfasserin aut In Symmetry MDPI AG, 2009 14(2022), 2, p 242 (DE-627)610604112 (DE-600)2518382-5 20738994 nnns volume:14 year:2022 number:2, p 242 https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020242 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/2/242 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2022 2, p 242
allfieldsSound	10.3390/sym14020242 doi (DE-627)DOAJ03269752X (DE-599)DOAJb0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QA1-939 Zhiyuan Chen verfasserin aut Airspace Operation Effectiveness Evaluation Based on q-Rung Orthopair Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy GRA and TOPSIS 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In order to improve the ability of airspace management, a multi-attribute decision-making tool based on q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy GRA-TOPSIS is proposed to solve the problem of airspace operation effectiveness evaluation; this is in view of the fact that there are few airspace operation effectiveness evaluation methods in general aviation airports. Firstly, taking general aviation airports as the research object, a complete airspace operation effectiveness evaluation system is newly established, its evaluation indicators are introduced, and its multi-attribute decision-making ideas are explained. Then, based on the q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy set, a new distance measure and information aggregation operator are defined, which can better deal with symmetry information. Secondly, we build a deviation maximization model to calculate the attribute weights of indicator elements in the decision-making process. Then, we combine the GRA method and TOPSIS method to rank the airspace operation effectiveness evaluation schemes. Finally, combined with calculation examples and comparative analysis, the reliability and rationality of the method proposed in this paper are verified, and the symmetry relationship between the evaluation results and the actual situation is better reflected. Experiments show that the method proposed in this paper can obtain more accurate airspace operation effectiveness evaluation results, and can provide reference for related research. airspace operation effectiveness multi-attribute decision-making q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set GRA method TOPSIS method Mathematics Di Shen verfasserin aut Yaojun Ren verfasserin aut Fuping Yu verfasserin aut Xiujiu Yuan verfasserin aut In Symmetry MDPI AG, 2009 14(2022), 2, p 242 (DE-627)610604112 (DE-600)2518382-5 20738994 nnns volume:14 year:2022 number:2, p 242 https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020242 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/2/242 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2022 2, p 242
language	English
source	In Symmetry 14(2022), 2, p 242 volume:14 year:2022 number:2, p 242
sourceStr	In Symmetry 14(2022), 2, p 242 volume:14 year:2022 number:2, p 242
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	airspace operation effectiveness multi-attribute decision-making q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set GRA method TOPSIS method Mathematics
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Symmetry
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Zhiyuan Chen @@aut@@ Di Shen @@aut@@ Yaojun Ren @@aut@@ Fuping Yu @@aut@@ Xiujiu Yuan @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	610604112
id	DOAJ03269752X
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ03269752X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414182519.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/sym14020242</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ03269752X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QA1-939</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhiyuan Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Airspace Operation Effectiveness Evaluation Based on q-Rung Orthopair Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy GRA and TOPSIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In order to improve the ability of airspace management, a multi-attribute decision-making tool based on q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy GRA-TOPSIS is proposed to solve the problem of airspace operation effectiveness evaluation; this is in view of the fact that there are few airspace operation effectiveness evaluation methods in general aviation airports. Firstly, taking general aviation airports as the research object, a complete airspace operation effectiveness evaluation system is newly established, its evaluation indicators are introduced, and its multi-attribute decision-making ideas are explained. Then, based on the q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy set, a new distance measure and information aggregation operator are defined, which can better deal with symmetry information. Secondly, we build a deviation maximization model to calculate the attribute weights of indicator elements in the decision-making process. Then, we combine the GRA method and TOPSIS method to rank the airspace operation effectiveness evaluation schemes. Finally, combined with calculation examples and comparative analysis, the reliability and rationality of the method proposed in this paper are verified, and the symmetry relationship between the evaluation results and the actual situation is better reflected. Experiments show that the method proposed in this paper can obtain more accurate airspace operation effectiveness evaluation results, and can provide reference for related research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">airspace operation effectiveness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">multi-attribute decision-making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">GRA method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">TOPSIS method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mathematics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Di Shen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yaojun Ren</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fuping Yu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiujiu Yuan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Symmetry</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2022), 2, p 242</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)610604112</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2518382-5</subfield><subfield code="x">20738994</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2, p 242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020242</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/2/242</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">2, p 242</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	Q - Science
author	Zhiyuan Chen
spellingShingle	Zhiyuan Chen misc QA1-939 misc airspace operation effectiveness misc multi-attribute decision-making misc q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set misc GRA method misc TOPSIS method misc Mathematics Airspace Operation Effectiveness Evaluation Based on q-Rung Orthopair Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy GRA and TOPSIS
authorStr	Zhiyuan Chen
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)610604112
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	QA1-939
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	20738994
topic_title	QA1-939 Airspace Operation Effectiveness Evaluation Based on q-Rung Orthopair Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy GRA and TOPSIS airspace operation effectiveness multi-attribute decision-making q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set GRA method TOPSIS method
topic	misc QA1-939 misc airspace operation effectiveness misc multi-attribute decision-making misc q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set misc GRA method misc TOPSIS method misc Mathematics
topic_unstemmed	misc QA1-939 misc airspace operation effectiveness misc multi-attribute decision-making misc q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set misc GRA method misc TOPSIS method misc Mathematics
topic_browse	misc QA1-939 misc airspace operation effectiveness misc multi-attribute decision-making misc q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set misc GRA method misc TOPSIS method misc Mathematics
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Symmetry
hierarchy_parent_id	610604112
hierarchy_top_title	Symmetry
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)610604112 (DE-600)2518382-5
title	Airspace Operation Effectiveness Evaluation Based on q-Rung Orthopair Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy GRA and TOPSIS
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ03269752X (DE-599)DOAJb0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652
title_full	Airspace Operation Effectiveness Evaluation Based on q-Rung Orthopair Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy GRA and TOPSIS
author_sort	Zhiyuan Chen
journal	Symmetry
journalStr	Symmetry
callnumber-first-code	Q
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Zhiyuan Chen Di Shen Yaojun Ren Fuping Yu Xiujiu Yuan
container_volume	14
class	QA1-939
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Zhiyuan Chen
doi_str_mv	10.3390/sym14020242
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	airspace operation effectiveness evaluation based on q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy gra and topsis
callnumber	QA1-939
title_auth	Airspace Operation Effectiveness Evaluation Based on q-Rung Orthopair Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy GRA and TOPSIS
abstract	In order to improve the ability of airspace management, a multi-attribute decision-making tool based on q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy GRA-TOPSIS is proposed to solve the problem of airspace operation effectiveness evaluation; this is in view of the fact that there are few airspace operation effectiveness evaluation methods in general aviation airports. Firstly, taking general aviation airports as the research object, a complete airspace operation effectiveness evaluation system is newly established, its evaluation indicators are introduced, and its multi-attribute decision-making ideas are explained. Then, based on the q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy set, a new distance measure and information aggregation operator are defined, which can better deal with symmetry information. Secondly, we build a deviation maximization model to calculate the attribute weights of indicator elements in the decision-making process. Then, we combine the GRA method and TOPSIS method to rank the airspace operation effectiveness evaluation schemes. Finally, combined with calculation examples and comparative analysis, the reliability and rationality of the method proposed in this paper are verified, and the symmetry relationship between the evaluation results and the actual situation is better reflected. Experiments show that the method proposed in this paper can obtain more accurate airspace operation effectiveness evaluation results, and can provide reference for related research.
abstractGer	In order to improve the ability of airspace management, a multi-attribute decision-making tool based on q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy GRA-TOPSIS is proposed to solve the problem of airspace operation effectiveness evaluation; this is in view of the fact that there are few airspace operation effectiveness evaluation methods in general aviation airports. Firstly, taking general aviation airports as the research object, a complete airspace operation effectiveness evaluation system is newly established, its evaluation indicators are introduced, and its multi-attribute decision-making ideas are explained. Then, based on the q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy set, a new distance measure and information aggregation operator are defined, which can better deal with symmetry information. Secondly, we build a deviation maximization model to calculate the attribute weights of indicator elements in the decision-making process. Then, we combine the GRA method and TOPSIS method to rank the airspace operation effectiveness evaluation schemes. Finally, combined with calculation examples and comparative analysis, the reliability and rationality of the method proposed in this paper are verified, and the symmetry relationship between the evaluation results and the actual situation is better reflected. Experiments show that the method proposed in this paper can obtain more accurate airspace operation effectiveness evaluation results, and can provide reference for related research.
abstract_unstemmed	In order to improve the ability of airspace management, a multi-attribute decision-making tool based on q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy GRA-TOPSIS is proposed to solve the problem of airspace operation effectiveness evaluation; this is in view of the fact that there are few airspace operation effectiveness evaluation methods in general aviation airports. Firstly, taking general aviation airports as the research object, a complete airspace operation effectiveness evaluation system is newly established, its evaluation indicators are introduced, and its multi-attribute decision-making ideas are explained. Then, based on the q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy set, a new distance measure and information aggregation operator are defined, which can better deal with symmetry information. Secondly, we build a deviation maximization model to calculate the attribute weights of indicator elements in the decision-making process. Then, we combine the GRA method and TOPSIS method to rank the airspace operation effectiveness evaluation schemes. Finally, combined with calculation examples and comparative analysis, the reliability and rationality of the method proposed in this paper are verified, and the symmetry relationship between the evaluation results and the actual situation is better reflected. Experiments show that the method proposed in this paper can obtain more accurate airspace operation effectiveness evaluation results, and can provide reference for related research.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	2, p 242
title_short	Airspace Operation Effectiveness Evaluation Based on q-Rung Orthopair Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy GRA and TOPSIS
url	https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020242 https://doaj.org/article/b0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652 https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/2/242 https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994
remote_bool	true
author2	Di Shen Yaojun Ren Fuping Yu Xiujiu Yuan
author2Str	Di Shen Yaojun Ren Fuping Yu Xiujiu Yuan
ppnlink	610604112
callnumber-subject	QA - Mathematics
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3390/sym14020242
callnumber-a	QA1-939
up_date	2024-07-03T13:34:34.111Z
_version_	1803565058351955968
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ03269752X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414182519.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/sym14020242</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ03269752X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QA1-939</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhiyuan Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Airspace Operation Effectiveness Evaluation Based on q-Rung Orthopair Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy GRA and TOPSIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In order to improve the ability of airspace management, a multi-attribute decision-making tool based on q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy GRA-TOPSIS is proposed to solve the problem of airspace operation effectiveness evaluation; this is in view of the fact that there are few airspace operation effectiveness evaluation methods in general aviation airports. Firstly, taking general aviation airports as the research object, a complete airspace operation effectiveness evaluation system is newly established, its evaluation indicators are introduced, and its multi-attribute decision-making ideas are explained. Then, based on the q-rung orthopair probability hesitant fuzzy set, a new distance measure and information aggregation operator are defined, which can better deal with symmetry information. Secondly, we build a deviation maximization model to calculate the attribute weights of indicator elements in the decision-making process. Then, we combine the GRA method and TOPSIS method to rank the airspace operation effectiveness evaluation schemes. Finally, combined with calculation examples and comparative analysis, the reliability and rationality of the method proposed in this paper are verified, and the symmetry relationship between the evaluation results and the actual situation is better reflected. Experiments show that the method proposed in this paper can obtain more accurate airspace operation effectiveness evaluation results, and can provide reference for related research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">airspace operation effectiveness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">multi-attribute decision-making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">GRA method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">TOPSIS method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mathematics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Di Shen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yaojun Ren</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fuping Yu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiujiu Yuan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Symmetry</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2022), 2, p 242</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)610604112</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2518382-5</subfield><subfield code="x">20738994</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2, p 242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020242</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b0525b3d73f04f8586028fd7effea652</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/2/242</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">2, p 242</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.402236

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Airspace Operation Effectiveness Evaluation Based on q-Rung Orthopair Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy GRA and TOPSIS

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?