Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study

Repair techniques for short-distance peripheral nerve defects, including adjacent joint flexion to reduce the distance between the nerve stump defects, "nerve splint" suturing, and nerve sleeve connection, have some disadvantages. Therefore, we designed a repair technique involving intraop...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Lu Bai [verfasserIn] Tian-bing Wang [verfasserIn] Xin Wang [verfasserIn] Wei-wen Zhang [verfasserIn] Ji-hai Xu [verfasserIn] Xiao-ming Cai [verfasserIn] Dan-ya Zhou [verfasserIn] Li-bing Cai [verfasserIn] Jia-dong Pan [verfasserIn] Min-tao Tian [verfasserIn] Hong Chen [verfasserIn] Dian-ying Zhang [verfasserIn] Zhong-guo Fu [verfasserIn] Pei-xun Zhang [verfasserIn] Bao-guo Jiang [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2015

Schlagwörter:	nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve deficiency; nerve elongator; British Medical Research Council scale; neurological function; prognosis; NSFC grants; neural regeneration

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Neural Regeneration Research - Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2014, 10(2015), 1, Seite 79-83
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:10 ; year:2015 ; number:1 ; pages:79-83

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.4103/1673-5374.150710

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ032847807

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ032847807
003	DE-627
005	20230501192827.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.4103/1673-5374.150710 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ032847807
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RC346-429
100	0		\|a Lu Bai \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study
264		1	\|c 2015
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Repair techniques for short-distance peripheral nerve defects, including adjacent joint flexion to reduce the distance between the nerve stump defects, "nerve splint" suturing, and nerve sleeve connection, have some disadvantages. Therefore, we designed a repair technique involving intraoperative tension-free application of a nerve elongator and obtained good outcomes in the repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects in a previous animal study. The present study compared the clinical outcomes between the use of this nerve elongator and performance of the conventional method in the repair of short-distance transection injuries in human elbows. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-up results demonstrated that early neurological function recovery was better in the nerve elongation group than in the conventional group, but no significant difference in long-term neurological function recovery was detected between the two groups. In the nerve elongation group, the nerves were sutured without tension, and the duration of postoperative immobilization of the elbow was decreased. Elbow function rehabilitation was significantly better in the nerve elongation group than in the control group. Moreover, there were no security risks. The results of this study confirm that the use of this nerve elongator for repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects is safe and effective.
650		4	\|a nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve deficiency; nerve elongator; British Medical Research Council scale; neurological function; prognosis; NSFC grants; neural regeneration
653		0	\|a Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
700	0		\|a Tian-bing Wang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Xin Wang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Wei-wen Zhang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Ji-hai Xu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Xiao-ming Cai \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Dan-ya Zhou \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Li-bing Cai \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jia-dong Pan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Min-tao Tian \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Hong Chen \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Dian-ying Zhang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Zhong-guo Fu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Pei-xun Zhang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Bao-guo Jiang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Neural Regeneration Research \|d Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2014 \|g 10(2015), 1, Seite 79-83 \|w (DE-627)545785499 \|w (DE-600)2388460-5 \|x 18767958 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:10 \|g year:2015 \|g number:1 \|g pages:79-83
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.150710 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.nrronline.org/article.asp?issn=1673-5374;year=2015;volume=10;issue=1;spage=79;epage=83;aulast=Bai \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1673-5374 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1876-7958 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_374
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2700
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2817
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 10 \|j 2015 \|e 1 \|h 79-83

Indexfelder

author_variant	l b lb t b w tbw x w xw w w z wwz j h x jhx x m c xmc d y z dyz l b c lbc j d p jdp m t t mtt h c hc d y z dyz z g f zgf p x z pxz b g j bgj
matchkey_str	article:18767958:2015----::sonrelnaotrpisotitneeihrlevdfcspo
hierarchy_sort_str	2015
callnumber-subject-code	RC
publishDate	2015
allfields	10.4103/1673-5374.150710 doi (DE-627)DOAJ032847807 (DE-599)DOAJ4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC346-429 Lu Bai verfasserin aut Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Repair techniques for short-distance peripheral nerve defects, including adjacent joint flexion to reduce the distance between the nerve stump defects, "nerve splint" suturing, and nerve sleeve connection, have some disadvantages. Therefore, we designed a repair technique involving intraoperative tension-free application of a nerve elongator and obtained good outcomes in the repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects in a previous animal study. The present study compared the clinical outcomes between the use of this nerve elongator and performance of the conventional method in the repair of short-distance transection injuries in human elbows. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-up results demonstrated that early neurological function recovery was better in the nerve elongation group than in the conventional group, but no significant difference in long-term neurological function recovery was detected between the two groups. In the nerve elongation group, the nerves were sutured without tension, and the duration of postoperative immobilization of the elbow was decreased. Elbow function rehabilitation was significantly better in the nerve elongation group than in the control group. Moreover, there were no security risks. The results of this study confirm that the use of this nerve elongator for repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects is safe and effective. nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve deficiency; nerve elongator; British Medical Research Council scale; neurological function; prognosis; NSFC grants; neural regeneration Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system Tian-bing Wang verfasserin aut Xin Wang verfasserin aut Wei-wen Zhang verfasserin aut Ji-hai Xu verfasserin aut Xiao-ming Cai verfasserin aut Dan-ya Zhou verfasserin aut Li-bing Cai verfasserin aut Jia-dong Pan verfasserin aut Min-tao Tian verfasserin aut Hong Chen verfasserin aut Dian-ying Zhang verfasserin aut Zhong-guo Fu verfasserin aut Pei-xun Zhang verfasserin aut Bao-guo Jiang verfasserin aut In Neural Regeneration Research Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2014 10(2015), 1, Seite 79-83 (DE-627)545785499 (DE-600)2388460-5 18767958 nnns volume:10 year:2015 number:1 pages:79-83 https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.150710 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602 kostenfrei http://www.nrronline.org/article.asp?issn=1673-5374;year=2015;volume=10;issue=1;spage=79;epage=83;aulast=Bai kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1673-5374 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1876-7958 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2700 GBV_ILN_2817 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2015 1 79-83
spelling	10.4103/1673-5374.150710 doi (DE-627)DOAJ032847807 (DE-599)DOAJ4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC346-429 Lu Bai verfasserin aut Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Repair techniques for short-distance peripheral nerve defects, including adjacent joint flexion to reduce the distance between the nerve stump defects, "nerve splint" suturing, and nerve sleeve connection, have some disadvantages. Therefore, we designed a repair technique involving intraoperative tension-free application of a nerve elongator and obtained good outcomes in the repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects in a previous animal study. The present study compared the clinical outcomes between the use of this nerve elongator and performance of the conventional method in the repair of short-distance transection injuries in human elbows. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-up results demonstrated that early neurological function recovery was better in the nerve elongation group than in the conventional group, but no significant difference in long-term neurological function recovery was detected between the two groups. In the nerve elongation group, the nerves were sutured without tension, and the duration of postoperative immobilization of the elbow was decreased. Elbow function rehabilitation was significantly better in the nerve elongation group than in the control group. Moreover, there were no security risks. The results of this study confirm that the use of this nerve elongator for repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects is safe and effective. nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve deficiency; nerve elongator; British Medical Research Council scale; neurological function; prognosis; NSFC grants; neural regeneration Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system Tian-bing Wang verfasserin aut Xin Wang verfasserin aut Wei-wen Zhang verfasserin aut Ji-hai Xu verfasserin aut Xiao-ming Cai verfasserin aut Dan-ya Zhou verfasserin aut Li-bing Cai verfasserin aut Jia-dong Pan verfasserin aut Min-tao Tian verfasserin aut Hong Chen verfasserin aut Dian-ying Zhang verfasserin aut Zhong-guo Fu verfasserin aut Pei-xun Zhang verfasserin aut Bao-guo Jiang verfasserin aut In Neural Regeneration Research Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2014 10(2015), 1, Seite 79-83 (DE-627)545785499 (DE-600)2388460-5 18767958 nnns volume:10 year:2015 number:1 pages:79-83 https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.150710 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602 kostenfrei http://www.nrronline.org/article.asp?issn=1673-5374;year=2015;volume=10;issue=1;spage=79;epage=83;aulast=Bai kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1673-5374 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1876-7958 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2700 GBV_ILN_2817 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2015 1 79-83
allfields_unstemmed	10.4103/1673-5374.150710 doi (DE-627)DOAJ032847807 (DE-599)DOAJ4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC346-429 Lu Bai verfasserin aut Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Repair techniques for short-distance peripheral nerve defects, including adjacent joint flexion to reduce the distance between the nerve stump defects, "nerve splint" suturing, and nerve sleeve connection, have some disadvantages. Therefore, we designed a repair technique involving intraoperative tension-free application of a nerve elongator and obtained good outcomes in the repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects in a previous animal study. The present study compared the clinical outcomes between the use of this nerve elongator and performance of the conventional method in the repair of short-distance transection injuries in human elbows. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-up results demonstrated that early neurological function recovery was better in the nerve elongation group than in the conventional group, but no significant difference in long-term neurological function recovery was detected between the two groups. In the nerve elongation group, the nerves were sutured without tension, and the duration of postoperative immobilization of the elbow was decreased. Elbow function rehabilitation was significantly better in the nerve elongation group than in the control group. Moreover, there were no security risks. The results of this study confirm that the use of this nerve elongator for repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects is safe and effective. nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve deficiency; nerve elongator; British Medical Research Council scale; neurological function; prognosis; NSFC grants; neural regeneration Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system Tian-bing Wang verfasserin aut Xin Wang verfasserin aut Wei-wen Zhang verfasserin aut Ji-hai Xu verfasserin aut Xiao-ming Cai verfasserin aut Dan-ya Zhou verfasserin aut Li-bing Cai verfasserin aut Jia-dong Pan verfasserin aut Min-tao Tian verfasserin aut Hong Chen verfasserin aut Dian-ying Zhang verfasserin aut Zhong-guo Fu verfasserin aut Pei-xun Zhang verfasserin aut Bao-guo Jiang verfasserin aut In Neural Regeneration Research Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2014 10(2015), 1, Seite 79-83 (DE-627)545785499 (DE-600)2388460-5 18767958 nnns volume:10 year:2015 number:1 pages:79-83 https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.150710 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602 kostenfrei http://www.nrronline.org/article.asp?issn=1673-5374;year=2015;volume=10;issue=1;spage=79;epage=83;aulast=Bai kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1673-5374 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1876-7958 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2700 GBV_ILN_2817 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2015 1 79-83
allfieldsGer	10.4103/1673-5374.150710 doi (DE-627)DOAJ032847807 (DE-599)DOAJ4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC346-429 Lu Bai verfasserin aut Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Repair techniques for short-distance peripheral nerve defects, including adjacent joint flexion to reduce the distance between the nerve stump defects, "nerve splint" suturing, and nerve sleeve connection, have some disadvantages. Therefore, we designed a repair technique involving intraoperative tension-free application of a nerve elongator and obtained good outcomes in the repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects in a previous animal study. The present study compared the clinical outcomes between the use of this nerve elongator and performance of the conventional method in the repair of short-distance transection injuries in human elbows. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-up results demonstrated that early neurological function recovery was better in the nerve elongation group than in the conventional group, but no significant difference in long-term neurological function recovery was detected between the two groups. In the nerve elongation group, the nerves were sutured without tension, and the duration of postoperative immobilization of the elbow was decreased. Elbow function rehabilitation was significantly better in the nerve elongation group than in the control group. Moreover, there were no security risks. The results of this study confirm that the use of this nerve elongator for repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects is safe and effective. nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve deficiency; nerve elongator; British Medical Research Council scale; neurological function; prognosis; NSFC grants; neural regeneration Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system Tian-bing Wang verfasserin aut Xin Wang verfasserin aut Wei-wen Zhang verfasserin aut Ji-hai Xu verfasserin aut Xiao-ming Cai verfasserin aut Dan-ya Zhou verfasserin aut Li-bing Cai verfasserin aut Jia-dong Pan verfasserin aut Min-tao Tian verfasserin aut Hong Chen verfasserin aut Dian-ying Zhang verfasserin aut Zhong-guo Fu verfasserin aut Pei-xun Zhang verfasserin aut Bao-guo Jiang verfasserin aut In Neural Regeneration Research Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2014 10(2015), 1, Seite 79-83 (DE-627)545785499 (DE-600)2388460-5 18767958 nnns volume:10 year:2015 number:1 pages:79-83 https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.150710 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602 kostenfrei http://www.nrronline.org/article.asp?issn=1673-5374;year=2015;volume=10;issue=1;spage=79;epage=83;aulast=Bai kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1673-5374 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1876-7958 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2700 GBV_ILN_2817 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2015 1 79-83
allfieldsSound	10.4103/1673-5374.150710 doi (DE-627)DOAJ032847807 (DE-599)DOAJ4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC346-429 Lu Bai verfasserin aut Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Repair techniques for short-distance peripheral nerve defects, including adjacent joint flexion to reduce the distance between the nerve stump defects, "nerve splint" suturing, and nerve sleeve connection, have some disadvantages. Therefore, we designed a repair technique involving intraoperative tension-free application of a nerve elongator and obtained good outcomes in the repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects in a previous animal study. The present study compared the clinical outcomes between the use of this nerve elongator and performance of the conventional method in the repair of short-distance transection injuries in human elbows. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-up results demonstrated that early neurological function recovery was better in the nerve elongation group than in the conventional group, but no significant difference in long-term neurological function recovery was detected between the two groups. In the nerve elongation group, the nerves were sutured without tension, and the duration of postoperative immobilization of the elbow was decreased. Elbow function rehabilitation was significantly better in the nerve elongation group than in the control group. Moreover, there were no security risks. The results of this study confirm that the use of this nerve elongator for repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects is safe and effective. nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve deficiency; nerve elongator; British Medical Research Council scale; neurological function; prognosis; NSFC grants; neural regeneration Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system Tian-bing Wang verfasserin aut Xin Wang verfasserin aut Wei-wen Zhang verfasserin aut Ji-hai Xu verfasserin aut Xiao-ming Cai verfasserin aut Dan-ya Zhou verfasserin aut Li-bing Cai verfasserin aut Jia-dong Pan verfasserin aut Min-tao Tian verfasserin aut Hong Chen verfasserin aut Dian-ying Zhang verfasserin aut Zhong-guo Fu verfasserin aut Pei-xun Zhang verfasserin aut Bao-guo Jiang verfasserin aut In Neural Regeneration Research Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2014 10(2015), 1, Seite 79-83 (DE-627)545785499 (DE-600)2388460-5 18767958 nnns volume:10 year:2015 number:1 pages:79-83 https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.150710 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602 kostenfrei http://www.nrronline.org/article.asp?issn=1673-5374;year=2015;volume=10;issue=1;spage=79;epage=83;aulast=Bai kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1673-5374 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1876-7958 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2700 GBV_ILN_2817 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2015 1 79-83
language	English
source	In Neural Regeneration Research 10(2015), 1, Seite 79-83 volume:10 year:2015 number:1 pages:79-83
sourceStr	In Neural Regeneration Research 10(2015), 1, Seite 79-83 volume:10 year:2015 number:1 pages:79-83
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve deficiency; nerve elongator; British Medical Research Council scale; neurological function; prognosis; NSFC grants; neural regeneration Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Neural Regeneration Research
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Lu Bai @@aut@@ Tian-bing Wang @@aut@@ Xin Wang @@aut@@ Wei-wen Zhang @@aut@@ Ji-hai Xu @@aut@@ Xiao-ming Cai @@aut@@ Dan-ya Zhou @@aut@@ Li-bing Cai @@aut@@ Jia-dong Pan @@aut@@ Min-tao Tian @@aut@@ Hong Chen @@aut@@ Dian-ying Zhang @@aut@@ Zhong-guo Fu @@aut@@ Pei-xun Zhang @@aut@@ Bao-guo Jiang @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	545785499
id	DOAJ032847807
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ032847807</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230501192827.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4103/1673-5374.150710</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ032847807</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC346-429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lu Bai</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Repair techniques for short-distance peripheral nerve defects, including adjacent joint flexion to reduce the distance between the nerve stump defects, "nerve splint" suturing, and nerve sleeve connection, have some disadvantages. Therefore, we designed a repair technique involving intraoperative tension-free application of a nerve elongator and obtained good outcomes in the repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects in a previous animal study. The present study compared the clinical outcomes between the use of this nerve elongator and performance of the conventional method in the repair of short-distance transection injuries in human elbows. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-up results demonstrated that early neurological function recovery was better in the nerve elongation group than in the conventional group, but no significant difference in long-term neurological function recovery was detected between the two groups. In the nerve elongation group, the nerves were sutured without tension, and the duration of postoperative immobilization of the elbow was decreased. Elbow function rehabilitation was significantly better in the nerve elongation group than in the control group. Moreover, there were no security risks. The results of this study confirm that the use of this nerve elongator for repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects is safe and effective.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve deficiency; nerve elongator; British Medical Research Council scale; neurological function; prognosis; NSFC grants; neural regeneration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tian-bing Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xin Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wei-wen Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ji-hai Xu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiao-ming Cai</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dan-ya Zhou</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li-bing Cai</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jia-dong Pan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Min-tao Tian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hong Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dian-ying Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhong-guo Fu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pei-xun Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bao-guo Jiang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Neural Regeneration Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2015), 1, Seite 79-83</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)545785499</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2388460-5</subfield><subfield code="x">18767958</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:79-83</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.150710</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.nrronline.org/article.asp?issn=1673-5374;year=2015;volume=10;issue=1;spage=79;epage=83;aulast=Bai</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1673-5374</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1876-7958</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2817</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">79-83</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Lu Bai
spellingShingle	Lu Bai misc RC346-429 misc nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve deficiency; nerve elongator; British Medical Research Council scale; neurological function; prognosis; NSFC grants; neural regeneration misc Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study
authorStr	Lu Bai
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)545785499
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RC346-429
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	18767958
topic_title	RC346-429 Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve deficiency; nerve elongator; British Medical Research Council scale; neurological function; prognosis; NSFC grants; neural regeneration
topic	misc RC346-429 misc nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve deficiency; nerve elongator; British Medical Research Council scale; neurological function; prognosis; NSFC grants; neural regeneration misc Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
topic_unstemmed	misc RC346-429 misc nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve deficiency; nerve elongator; British Medical Research Council scale; neurological function; prognosis; NSFC grants; neural regeneration misc Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
topic_browse	misc RC346-429 misc nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve deficiency; nerve elongator; British Medical Research Council scale; neurological function; prognosis; NSFC grants; neural regeneration misc Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Neural Regeneration Research
hierarchy_parent_id	545785499
hierarchy_top_title	Neural Regeneration Research
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)545785499 (DE-600)2388460-5
title	Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ032847807 (DE-599)DOAJ4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602
title_full	Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study
author_sort	Lu Bai
journal	Neural Regeneration Research
journalStr	Neural Regeneration Research
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2015
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	79
author_browse	Lu Bai Tian-bing Wang Xin Wang Wei-wen Zhang Ji-hai Xu Xiao-ming Cai Dan-ya Zhou Li-bing Cai Jia-dong Pan Min-tao Tian Hong Chen Dian-ying Zhang Zhong-guo Fu Pei-xun Zhang Bao-guo Jiang
container_volume	10
class	RC346-429
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Lu Bai
doi_str_mv	10.4103/1673-5374.150710
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study
callnumber	RC346-429
title_auth	Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study
abstract	Repair techniques for short-distance peripheral nerve defects, including adjacent joint flexion to reduce the distance between the nerve stump defects, "nerve splint" suturing, and nerve sleeve connection, have some disadvantages. Therefore, we designed a repair technique involving intraoperative tension-free application of a nerve elongator and obtained good outcomes in the repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects in a previous animal study. The present study compared the clinical outcomes between the use of this nerve elongator and performance of the conventional method in the repair of short-distance transection injuries in human elbows. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-up results demonstrated that early neurological function recovery was better in the nerve elongation group than in the conventional group, but no significant difference in long-term neurological function recovery was detected between the two groups. In the nerve elongation group, the nerves were sutured without tension, and the duration of postoperative immobilization of the elbow was decreased. Elbow function rehabilitation was significantly better in the nerve elongation group than in the control group. Moreover, there were no security risks. The results of this study confirm that the use of this nerve elongator for repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects is safe and effective.
abstractGer	Repair techniques for short-distance peripheral nerve defects, including adjacent joint flexion to reduce the distance between the nerve stump defects, "nerve splint" suturing, and nerve sleeve connection, have some disadvantages. Therefore, we designed a repair technique involving intraoperative tension-free application of a nerve elongator and obtained good outcomes in the repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects in a previous animal study. The present study compared the clinical outcomes between the use of this nerve elongator and performance of the conventional method in the repair of short-distance transection injuries in human elbows. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-up results demonstrated that early neurological function recovery was better in the nerve elongation group than in the conventional group, but no significant difference in long-term neurological function recovery was detected between the two groups. In the nerve elongation group, the nerves were sutured without tension, and the duration of postoperative immobilization of the elbow was decreased. Elbow function rehabilitation was significantly better in the nerve elongation group than in the control group. Moreover, there were no security risks. The results of this study confirm that the use of this nerve elongator for repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects is safe and effective.
abstract_unstemmed	Repair techniques for short-distance peripheral nerve defects, including adjacent joint flexion to reduce the distance between the nerve stump defects, "nerve splint" suturing, and nerve sleeve connection, have some disadvantages. Therefore, we designed a repair technique involving intraoperative tension-free application of a nerve elongator and obtained good outcomes in the repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects in a previous animal study. The present study compared the clinical outcomes between the use of this nerve elongator and performance of the conventional method in the repair of short-distance transection injuries in human elbows. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-up results demonstrated that early neurological function recovery was better in the nerve elongation group than in the conventional group, but no significant difference in long-term neurological function recovery was detected between the two groups. In the nerve elongation group, the nerves were sutured without tension, and the duration of postoperative immobilization of the elbow was decreased. Elbow function rehabilitation was significantly better in the nerve elongation group than in the control group. Moreover, there were no security risks. The results of this study confirm that the use of this nerve elongator for repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects is safe and effective.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2700 GBV_ILN_2817 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study
url	https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.150710 https://doaj.org/article/4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602 http://www.nrronline.org/article.asp?issn=1673-5374;year=2015;volume=10;issue=1;spage=79;epage=83;aulast=Bai https://doaj.org/toc/1673-5374 https://doaj.org/toc/1876-7958
remote_bool	true
author2	Tian-bing Wang Xin Wang Wei-wen Zhang Ji-hai Xu Xiao-ming Cai Dan-ya Zhou Li-bing Cai Jia-dong Pan Min-tao Tian Hong Chen Dian-ying Zhang Zhong-guo Fu Pei-xun Zhang Bao-guo Jiang
author2Str	Tian-bing Wang Xin Wang Wei-wen Zhang Ji-hai Xu Xiao-ming Cai Dan-ya Zhou Li-bing Cai Jia-dong Pan Min-tao Tian Hong Chen Dian-ying Zhang Zhong-guo Fu Pei-xun Zhang Bao-guo Jiang
ppnlink	545785499
callnumber-subject	RC - Internal Medicine
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.4103/1673-5374.150710
callnumber-a	RC346-429
up_date	2024-07-03T14:25:59.166Z
_version_	1803568293268684800
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ032847807</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230501192827.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4103/1673-5374.150710</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ032847807</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC346-429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lu Bai</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Repair techniques for short-distance peripheral nerve defects, including adjacent joint flexion to reduce the distance between the nerve stump defects, "nerve splint" suturing, and nerve sleeve connection, have some disadvantages. Therefore, we designed a repair technique involving intraoperative tension-free application of a nerve elongator and obtained good outcomes in the repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects in a previous animal study. The present study compared the clinical outcomes between the use of this nerve elongator and performance of the conventional method in the repair of short-distance transection injuries in human elbows. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-up results demonstrated that early neurological function recovery was better in the nerve elongation group than in the conventional group, but no significant difference in long-term neurological function recovery was detected between the two groups. In the nerve elongation group, the nerves were sutured without tension, and the duration of postoperative immobilization of the elbow was decreased. Elbow function rehabilitation was significantly better in the nerve elongation group than in the control group. Moreover, there were no security risks. The results of this study confirm that the use of this nerve elongator for repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects is safe and effective.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve deficiency; nerve elongator; British Medical Research Council scale; neurological function; prognosis; NSFC grants; neural regeneration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tian-bing Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xin Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wei-wen Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ji-hai Xu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiao-ming Cai</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dan-ya Zhou</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li-bing Cai</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jia-dong Pan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Min-tao Tian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hong Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dian-ying Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhong-guo Fu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pei-xun Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bao-guo Jiang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Neural Regeneration Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2015), 1, Seite 79-83</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)545785499</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2388460-5</subfield><subfield code="x">18767958</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:79-83</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.150710</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4e321686d7ff4b27b54d33cf73dfb602</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.nrronline.org/article.asp?issn=1673-5374;year=2015;volume=10;issue=1;spage=79;epage=83;aulast=Bai</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1673-5374</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1876-7958</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2817</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">79-83</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.398486

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?