Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study
Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Peter Y. Joo [verfasserIn] Antonia F. Chen [verfasserIn] Jarod Richards [verfasserIn] Tsun Y. Law [verfasserIn] Kelly Taylor [verfasserIn] Kevin Marchand [verfasserIn] Gavin Clark [verfasserIn] Dermot Collopy [verfasserIn] Robert C. Marchand [verfasserIn] Martin Roche [verfasserIn] Michael A. Mont [verfasserIn] Arthur L. Malkani [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Bone & Joint Open - The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020, 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:3 ; year:2022 ; number:7 ; pages:589-595 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ032991665 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ032991665 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230503022337.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ032991665 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a RD701-811 | |
100 | 0 | |a Peter Y. Joo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595. | ||
650 | 4 | |a robotics | |
650 | 4 | |a total knee arthroplasty | |
650 | 4 | |a total knee replacement | |
650 | 4 | |a patient reported outcomes | |
650 | 4 | |a patient-reported outcome measures | |
650 | 4 | |a patient-reported outcome measures (proms) | |
650 | 4 | |a primary total knee arthroplasty | |
650 | 4 | |a total knee arthroplasties (tkas) | |
650 | 4 | |a forgotten joint score (fjs) | |
650 | 4 | |a koos jr | |
650 | 4 | |a pain scores | |
650 | 4 | |a knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score | |
650 | 4 | |a robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty | |
650 | 4 | |a joint replacement | |
650 | 4 | |a clinical outcomes | |
653 | 0 | |a Orthopedic surgery | |
700 | 0 | |a Antonia F. Chen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Jarod Richards |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Tsun Y. Law |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Kelly Taylor |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Kevin Marchand |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Gavin Clark |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Dermot Collopy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Robert C. Marchand |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Martin Roche |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Michael A. Mont |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Arthur L. Malkani |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Bone & Joint Open |d The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020 |g 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 |w (DE-627)1694585433 |x 26331462 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:2022 |g number:7 |g pages:589-595 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 3 |j 2022 |e 7 |h 589-595 |
author_variant |
p y j pyj a f c afc j r jr t y l tyl k t kt k m km g c gc d c dc r c m rcm m r mr m a m mam a l m alm |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:26331462:2022----::lncleutadainrpreotoefloigooiassepiayoake |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
callnumber-subject-code |
RD |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 doi (DE-627)DOAJ032991665 (DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD701-811 Peter Y. Joo verfasserin aut Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595. robotics total knee arthroplasty total knee replacement patient reported outcomes patient-reported outcome measures patient-reported outcome measures (proms) primary total knee arthroplasty total knee arthroplasties (tkas) forgotten joint score (fjs) koos jr pain scores knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty joint replacement clinical outcomes Orthopedic surgery Antonia F. Chen verfasserin aut Jarod Richards verfasserin aut Tsun Y. Law verfasserin aut Kelly Taylor verfasserin aut Kevin Marchand verfasserin aut Gavin Clark verfasserin aut Dermot Collopy verfasserin aut Robert C. Marchand verfasserin aut Martin Roche verfasserin aut Michael A. Mont verfasserin aut Arthur L. Malkani verfasserin aut In Bone & Joint Open The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 (DE-627)1694585433 26331462 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:7 pages:589-595 https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 kostenfrei https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2022 7 589-595 |
spelling |
10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 doi (DE-627)DOAJ032991665 (DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD701-811 Peter Y. Joo verfasserin aut Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595. robotics total knee arthroplasty total knee replacement patient reported outcomes patient-reported outcome measures patient-reported outcome measures (proms) primary total knee arthroplasty total knee arthroplasties (tkas) forgotten joint score (fjs) koos jr pain scores knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty joint replacement clinical outcomes Orthopedic surgery Antonia F. Chen verfasserin aut Jarod Richards verfasserin aut Tsun Y. Law verfasserin aut Kelly Taylor verfasserin aut Kevin Marchand verfasserin aut Gavin Clark verfasserin aut Dermot Collopy verfasserin aut Robert C. Marchand verfasserin aut Martin Roche verfasserin aut Michael A. Mont verfasserin aut Arthur L. Malkani verfasserin aut In Bone & Joint Open The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 (DE-627)1694585433 26331462 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:7 pages:589-595 https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 kostenfrei https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2022 7 589-595 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 doi (DE-627)DOAJ032991665 (DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD701-811 Peter Y. Joo verfasserin aut Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595. robotics total knee arthroplasty total knee replacement patient reported outcomes patient-reported outcome measures patient-reported outcome measures (proms) primary total knee arthroplasty total knee arthroplasties (tkas) forgotten joint score (fjs) koos jr pain scores knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty joint replacement clinical outcomes Orthopedic surgery Antonia F. Chen verfasserin aut Jarod Richards verfasserin aut Tsun Y. Law verfasserin aut Kelly Taylor verfasserin aut Kevin Marchand verfasserin aut Gavin Clark verfasserin aut Dermot Collopy verfasserin aut Robert C. Marchand verfasserin aut Martin Roche verfasserin aut Michael A. Mont verfasserin aut Arthur L. Malkani verfasserin aut In Bone & Joint Open The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 (DE-627)1694585433 26331462 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:7 pages:589-595 https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 kostenfrei https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2022 7 589-595 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 doi (DE-627)DOAJ032991665 (DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD701-811 Peter Y. Joo verfasserin aut Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595. robotics total knee arthroplasty total knee replacement patient reported outcomes patient-reported outcome measures patient-reported outcome measures (proms) primary total knee arthroplasty total knee arthroplasties (tkas) forgotten joint score (fjs) koos jr pain scores knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty joint replacement clinical outcomes Orthopedic surgery Antonia F. Chen verfasserin aut Jarod Richards verfasserin aut Tsun Y. Law verfasserin aut Kelly Taylor verfasserin aut Kevin Marchand verfasserin aut Gavin Clark verfasserin aut Dermot Collopy verfasserin aut Robert C. Marchand verfasserin aut Martin Roche verfasserin aut Michael A. Mont verfasserin aut Arthur L. Malkani verfasserin aut In Bone & Joint Open The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 (DE-627)1694585433 26331462 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:7 pages:589-595 https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 kostenfrei https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2022 7 589-595 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 doi (DE-627)DOAJ032991665 (DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD701-811 Peter Y. Joo verfasserin aut Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595. robotics total knee arthroplasty total knee replacement patient reported outcomes patient-reported outcome measures patient-reported outcome measures (proms) primary total knee arthroplasty total knee arthroplasties (tkas) forgotten joint score (fjs) koos jr pain scores knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty joint replacement clinical outcomes Orthopedic surgery Antonia F. Chen verfasserin aut Jarod Richards verfasserin aut Tsun Y. Law verfasserin aut Kelly Taylor verfasserin aut Kevin Marchand verfasserin aut Gavin Clark verfasserin aut Dermot Collopy verfasserin aut Robert C. Marchand verfasserin aut Martin Roche verfasserin aut Michael A. Mont verfasserin aut Arthur L. Malkani verfasserin aut In Bone & Joint Open The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 (DE-627)1694585433 26331462 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:7 pages:589-595 https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 kostenfrei https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2022 7 589-595 |
language |
English |
source |
In Bone & Joint Open 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 volume:3 year:2022 number:7 pages:589-595 |
sourceStr |
In Bone & Joint Open 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 volume:3 year:2022 number:7 pages:589-595 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
robotics total knee arthroplasty total knee replacement patient reported outcomes patient-reported outcome measures patient-reported outcome measures (proms) primary total knee arthroplasty total knee arthroplasties (tkas) forgotten joint score (fjs) koos jr pain scores knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty joint replacement clinical outcomes Orthopedic surgery |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Bone & Joint Open |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Peter Y. Joo @@aut@@ Antonia F. Chen @@aut@@ Jarod Richards @@aut@@ Tsun Y. Law @@aut@@ Kelly Taylor @@aut@@ Kevin Marchand @@aut@@ Gavin Clark @@aut@@ Dermot Collopy @@aut@@ Robert C. Marchand @@aut@@ Martin Roche @@aut@@ Michael A. Mont @@aut@@ Arthur L. Malkani @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1694585433 |
id |
DOAJ032991665 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ032991665</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503022337.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ032991665</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RD701-811</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peter Y. Joo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">robotics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">total knee arthroplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">total knee replacement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient reported outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient-reported outcome measures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient-reported outcome measures (proms)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">primary total knee arthroplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">total knee arthroplasties (tkas)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">forgotten joint score (fjs)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">koos jr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pain scores</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">joint replacement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">clinical outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Orthopedic surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Antonia F. Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jarod Richards</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tsun Y. Law</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kelly Taylor</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kevin Marchand</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gavin Clark</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dermot Collopy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Robert C. Marchand</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martin Roche</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michael A. Mont</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arthur L. Malkani</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Bone & Joint Open</subfield><subfield code="d">The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1694585433</subfield><subfield code="x">26331462</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:589-595</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="h">589-595</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
author |
Peter Y. Joo |
spellingShingle |
Peter Y. Joo misc RD701-811 misc robotics misc total knee arthroplasty misc total knee replacement misc patient reported outcomes misc patient-reported outcome measures misc patient-reported outcome measures (proms) misc primary total knee arthroplasty misc total knee arthroplasties (tkas) misc forgotten joint score (fjs) misc koos jr misc pain scores misc knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score misc robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty misc joint replacement misc clinical outcomes misc Orthopedic surgery Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study |
authorStr |
Peter Y. Joo |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1694585433 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
RD701-811 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
26331462 |
topic_title |
RD701-811 Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study robotics total knee arthroplasty total knee replacement patient reported outcomes patient-reported outcome measures patient-reported outcome measures (proms) primary total knee arthroplasty total knee arthroplasties (tkas) forgotten joint score (fjs) koos jr pain scores knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty joint replacement clinical outcomes |
topic |
misc RD701-811 misc robotics misc total knee arthroplasty misc total knee replacement misc patient reported outcomes misc patient-reported outcome measures misc patient-reported outcome measures (proms) misc primary total knee arthroplasty misc total knee arthroplasties (tkas) misc forgotten joint score (fjs) misc koos jr misc pain scores misc knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score misc robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty misc joint replacement misc clinical outcomes misc Orthopedic surgery |
topic_unstemmed |
misc RD701-811 misc robotics misc total knee arthroplasty misc total knee replacement misc patient reported outcomes misc patient-reported outcome measures misc patient-reported outcome measures (proms) misc primary total knee arthroplasty misc total knee arthroplasties (tkas) misc forgotten joint score (fjs) misc koos jr misc pain scores misc knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score misc robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty misc joint replacement misc clinical outcomes misc Orthopedic surgery |
topic_browse |
misc RD701-811 misc robotics misc total knee arthroplasty misc total knee replacement misc patient reported outcomes misc patient-reported outcome measures misc patient-reported outcome measures (proms) misc primary total knee arthroplasty misc total knee arthroplasties (tkas) misc forgotten joint score (fjs) misc koos jr misc pain scores misc knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score misc robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty misc joint replacement misc clinical outcomes misc Orthopedic surgery |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Bone & Joint Open |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1694585433 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Bone & Joint Open |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1694585433 |
title |
Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ032991665 (DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 |
title_full |
Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study |
author_sort |
Peter Y. Joo |
journal |
Bone & Joint Open |
journalStr |
Bone & Joint Open |
callnumber-first-code |
R |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
589 |
author_browse |
Peter Y. Joo Antonia F. Chen Jarod Richards Tsun Y. Law Kelly Taylor Kevin Marchand Gavin Clark Dermot Collopy Robert C. Marchand Martin Roche Michael A. Mont Arthur L. Malkani |
container_volume |
3 |
class |
RD701-811 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Peter Y. Joo |
doi_str_mv |
10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study |
callnumber |
RD701-811 |
title_auth |
Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study |
abstract |
Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595. |
abstractGer |
Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
7 |
title_short |
Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Antonia F. Chen Jarod Richards Tsun Y. Law Kelly Taylor Kevin Marchand Gavin Clark Dermot Collopy Robert C. Marchand Martin Roche Michael A. Mont Arthur L. Malkani |
author2Str |
Antonia F. Chen Jarod Richards Tsun Y. Law Kelly Taylor Kevin Marchand Gavin Clark Dermot Collopy Robert C. Marchand Martin Roche Michael A. Mont Arthur L. Malkani |
ppnlink |
1694585433 |
callnumber-subject |
RD - Surgery |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 |
callnumber-a |
RD701-811 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T15:13:50.507Z |
_version_ |
1803571304095285248 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ032991665</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503022337.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ032991665</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RD701-811</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peter Y. Joo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">robotics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">total knee arthroplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">total knee replacement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient reported outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient-reported outcome measures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient-reported outcome measures (proms)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">primary total knee arthroplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">total knee arthroplasties (tkas)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">forgotten joint score (fjs)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">koos jr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pain scores</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">joint replacement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">clinical outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Orthopedic surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Antonia F. Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jarod Richards</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tsun Y. Law</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kelly Taylor</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kevin Marchand</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gavin Clark</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dermot Collopy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Robert C. Marchand</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martin Roche</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michael A. Mont</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arthur L. Malkani</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Bone & Joint Open</subfield><subfield code="d">The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1694585433</subfield><subfield code="x">26331462</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:589-595</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="h">589-595</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4006443 |