Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study

Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Peter Y. Joo [verfasserIn] Antonia F. Chen [verfasserIn] Jarod Richards [verfasserIn] Tsun Y. Law [verfasserIn] Kelly Taylor [verfasserIn] Kevin Marchand [verfasserIn] Gavin Clark [verfasserIn] Dermot Collopy [verfasserIn] Robert C. Marchand [verfasserIn] Martin Roche [verfasserIn] Michael A. Mont [verfasserIn] Arthur L. Malkani [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	robotics total knee arthroplasty total knee replacement patient reported outcomes patient-reported outcome measures patient-reported outcome measures (proms) primary total knee arthroplasty total knee arthroplasties (tkas) forgotten joint score (fjs) koos jr pain scores knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty joint replacement clinical outcomes

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Bone & Joint Open - The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020, 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:3 ; year:2022 ; number:7 ; pages:589-595

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ032991665

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ032991665
003	DE-627
005	20230503022337.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ032991665
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RD701-811
100	0		\|a Peter Y. Joo \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595.
650		4	\|a robotics
650		4	\|a total knee arthroplasty
650		4	\|a total knee replacement
650		4	\|a patient reported outcomes
650		4	\|a patient-reported outcome measures
650		4	\|a patient-reported outcome measures (proms)
650		4	\|a primary total knee arthroplasty
650		4	\|a total knee arthroplasties (tkas)
650		4	\|a forgotten joint score (fjs)
650		4	\|a koos jr
650		4	\|a pain scores
650		4	\|a knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score
650		4	\|a robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
650		4	\|a joint replacement
650		4	\|a clinical outcomes
653		0	\|a Orthopedic surgery
700	0		\|a Antonia F. Chen \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jarod Richards \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Tsun Y. Law \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Kelly Taylor \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Kevin Marchand \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Gavin Clark \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Dermot Collopy \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Robert C. Marchand \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Martin Roche \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Michael A. Mont \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Arthur L. Malkani \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Bone & Joint Open \|d The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020 \|g 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 \|w (DE-627)1694585433 \|x 26331462 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:3 \|g year:2022 \|g number:7 \|g pages:589-595
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 3 \|j 2022 \|e 7 \|h 589-595

Indexfelder

author_variant	p y j pyj a f c afc j r jr t y l tyl k t kt k m km g c gc d c dc r c m rcm m r mr m a m mam a l m alm
matchkey_str	article:26331462:2022----::lncleutadainrpreotoefloigooiassepiayoake
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
callnumber-subject-code	RD
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 doi (DE-627)DOAJ032991665 (DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD701-811 Peter Y. Joo verfasserin aut Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595. robotics total knee arthroplasty total knee replacement patient reported outcomes patient-reported outcome measures patient-reported outcome measures (proms) primary total knee arthroplasty total knee arthroplasties (tkas) forgotten joint score (fjs) koos jr pain scores knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty joint replacement clinical outcomes Orthopedic surgery Antonia F. Chen verfasserin aut Jarod Richards verfasserin aut Tsun Y. Law verfasserin aut Kelly Taylor verfasserin aut Kevin Marchand verfasserin aut Gavin Clark verfasserin aut Dermot Collopy verfasserin aut Robert C. Marchand verfasserin aut Martin Roche verfasserin aut Michael A. Mont verfasserin aut Arthur L. Malkani verfasserin aut In Bone & Joint Open The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 (DE-627)1694585433 26331462 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:7 pages:589-595 https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 kostenfrei https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2022 7 589-595
spelling	10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 doi (DE-627)DOAJ032991665 (DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD701-811 Peter Y. Joo verfasserin aut Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595. robotics total knee arthroplasty total knee replacement patient reported outcomes patient-reported outcome measures patient-reported outcome measures (proms) primary total knee arthroplasty total knee arthroplasties (tkas) forgotten joint score (fjs) koos jr pain scores knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty joint replacement clinical outcomes Orthopedic surgery Antonia F. Chen verfasserin aut Jarod Richards verfasserin aut Tsun Y. Law verfasserin aut Kelly Taylor verfasserin aut Kevin Marchand verfasserin aut Gavin Clark verfasserin aut Dermot Collopy verfasserin aut Robert C. Marchand verfasserin aut Martin Roche verfasserin aut Michael A. Mont verfasserin aut Arthur L. Malkani verfasserin aut In Bone & Joint Open The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 (DE-627)1694585433 26331462 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:7 pages:589-595 https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 kostenfrei https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2022 7 589-595
allfields_unstemmed	10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 doi (DE-627)DOAJ032991665 (DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD701-811 Peter Y. Joo verfasserin aut Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595. robotics total knee arthroplasty total knee replacement patient reported outcomes patient-reported outcome measures patient-reported outcome measures (proms) primary total knee arthroplasty total knee arthroplasties (tkas) forgotten joint score (fjs) koos jr pain scores knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty joint replacement clinical outcomes Orthopedic surgery Antonia F. Chen verfasserin aut Jarod Richards verfasserin aut Tsun Y. Law verfasserin aut Kelly Taylor verfasserin aut Kevin Marchand verfasserin aut Gavin Clark verfasserin aut Dermot Collopy verfasserin aut Robert C. Marchand verfasserin aut Martin Roche verfasserin aut Michael A. Mont verfasserin aut Arthur L. Malkani verfasserin aut In Bone & Joint Open The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 (DE-627)1694585433 26331462 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:7 pages:589-595 https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 kostenfrei https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2022 7 589-595
allfieldsGer	10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 doi (DE-627)DOAJ032991665 (DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD701-811 Peter Y. Joo verfasserin aut Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595. robotics total knee arthroplasty total knee replacement patient reported outcomes patient-reported outcome measures patient-reported outcome measures (proms) primary total knee arthroplasty total knee arthroplasties (tkas) forgotten joint score (fjs) koos jr pain scores knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty joint replacement clinical outcomes Orthopedic surgery Antonia F. Chen verfasserin aut Jarod Richards verfasserin aut Tsun Y. Law verfasserin aut Kelly Taylor verfasserin aut Kevin Marchand verfasserin aut Gavin Clark verfasserin aut Dermot Collopy verfasserin aut Robert C. Marchand verfasserin aut Martin Roche verfasserin aut Michael A. Mont verfasserin aut Arthur L. Malkani verfasserin aut In Bone & Joint Open The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 (DE-627)1694585433 26331462 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:7 pages:589-595 https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 kostenfrei https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2022 7 589-595
allfieldsSound	10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 doi (DE-627)DOAJ032991665 (DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD701-811 Peter Y. Joo verfasserin aut Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595. robotics total knee arthroplasty total knee replacement patient reported outcomes patient-reported outcome measures patient-reported outcome measures (proms) primary total knee arthroplasty total knee arthroplasties (tkas) forgotten joint score (fjs) koos jr pain scores knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty joint replacement clinical outcomes Orthopedic surgery Antonia F. Chen verfasserin aut Jarod Richards verfasserin aut Tsun Y. Law verfasserin aut Kelly Taylor verfasserin aut Kevin Marchand verfasserin aut Gavin Clark verfasserin aut Dermot Collopy verfasserin aut Robert C. Marchand verfasserin aut Martin Roche verfasserin aut Michael A. Mont verfasserin aut Arthur L. Malkani verfasserin aut In Bone & Joint Open The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 (DE-627)1694585433 26331462 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:7 pages:589-595 https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 kostenfrei https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2022 7 589-595
language	English
source	In Bone & Joint Open 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 volume:3 year:2022 number:7 pages:589-595
sourceStr	In Bone & Joint Open 3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595 volume:3 year:2022 number:7 pages:589-595
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	robotics total knee arthroplasty total knee replacement patient reported outcomes patient-reported outcome measures patient-reported outcome measures (proms) primary total knee arthroplasty total knee arthroplasties (tkas) forgotten joint score (fjs) koos jr pain scores knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty joint replacement clinical outcomes Orthopedic surgery
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Bone & Joint Open
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Peter Y. Joo @@aut@@ Antonia F. Chen @@aut@@ Jarod Richards @@aut@@ Tsun Y. Law @@aut@@ Kelly Taylor @@aut@@ Kevin Marchand @@aut@@ Gavin Clark @@aut@@ Dermot Collopy @@aut@@ Robert C. Marchand @@aut@@ Martin Roche @@aut@@ Michael A. Mont @@aut@@ Arthur L. Malkani @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	1694585433
id	DOAJ032991665
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ032991665</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503022337.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ032991665</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RD701-811</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peter Y. Joo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">robotics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">total knee arthroplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">total knee replacement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient reported outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient-reported outcome measures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient-reported outcome measures (proms)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">primary total knee arthroplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">total knee arthroplasties (tkas)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">forgotten joint score (fjs)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">koos jr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pain scores</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">joint replacement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">clinical outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Orthopedic surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Antonia F. Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jarod Richards</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tsun Y. Law</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kelly Taylor</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kevin Marchand</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gavin Clark</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dermot Collopy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Robert C. Marchand</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martin Roche</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michael A. Mont</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arthur L. Malkani</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Bone & Joint Open</subfield><subfield code="d">The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1694585433</subfield><subfield code="x">26331462</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:589-595</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="h">589-595</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Peter Y. Joo
spellingShingle	Peter Y. Joo misc RD701-811 misc robotics misc total knee arthroplasty misc total knee replacement misc patient reported outcomes misc patient-reported outcome measures misc patient-reported outcome measures (proms) misc primary total knee arthroplasty misc total knee arthroplasties (tkas) misc forgotten joint score (fjs) misc koos jr misc pain scores misc knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score misc robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty misc joint replacement misc clinical outcomes misc Orthopedic surgery Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study
authorStr	Peter Y. Joo
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)1694585433
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RD701-811
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	26331462
topic_title	RD701-811 Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study robotics total knee arthroplasty total knee replacement patient reported outcomes patient-reported outcome measures patient-reported outcome measures (proms) primary total knee arthroplasty total knee arthroplasties (tkas) forgotten joint score (fjs) koos jr pain scores knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty joint replacement clinical outcomes
topic	misc RD701-811 misc robotics misc total knee arthroplasty misc total knee replacement misc patient reported outcomes misc patient-reported outcome measures misc patient-reported outcome measures (proms) misc primary total knee arthroplasty misc total knee arthroplasties (tkas) misc forgotten joint score (fjs) misc koos jr misc pain scores misc knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score misc robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty misc joint replacement misc clinical outcomes misc Orthopedic surgery
topic_unstemmed	misc RD701-811 misc robotics misc total knee arthroplasty misc total knee replacement misc patient reported outcomes misc patient-reported outcome measures misc patient-reported outcome measures (proms) misc primary total knee arthroplasty misc total knee arthroplasties (tkas) misc forgotten joint score (fjs) misc koos jr misc pain scores misc knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score misc robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty misc joint replacement misc clinical outcomes misc Orthopedic surgery
topic_browse	misc RD701-811 misc robotics misc total knee arthroplasty misc total knee replacement misc patient reported outcomes misc patient-reported outcome measures misc patient-reported outcome measures (proms) misc primary total knee arthroplasty misc total knee arthroplasties (tkas) misc forgotten joint score (fjs) misc koos jr misc pain scores misc knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score misc robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty misc joint replacement misc clinical outcomes misc Orthopedic surgery
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Bone & Joint Open
hierarchy_parent_id	1694585433
hierarchy_top_title	Bone & Joint Open
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)1694585433
title	Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ032991665 (DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28
title_full	Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study
author_sort	Peter Y. Joo
journal	Bone & Joint Open
journalStr	Bone & Joint Open
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	589
author_browse	Peter Y. Joo Antonia F. Chen Jarod Richards Tsun Y. Law Kelly Taylor Kevin Marchand Gavin Clark Dermot Collopy Robert C. Marchand Martin Roche Michael A. Mont Arthur L. Malkani
container_volume	3
class	RD701-811
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Peter Y. Joo
doi_str_mv	10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study
callnumber	RD701-811
title_auth	Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study
abstract	Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595.
abstractGer	Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595.
abstract_unstemmed	Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	7
title_short	Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study
url	https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28 https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1 https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462
remote_bool	true
author2	Antonia F. Chen Jarod Richards Tsun Y. Law Kelly Taylor Kevin Marchand Gavin Clark Dermot Collopy Robert C. Marchand Martin Roche Michael A. Mont Arthur L. Malkani
author2Str	Antonia F. Chen Jarod Richards Tsun Y. Law Kelly Taylor Kevin Marchand Gavin Clark Dermot Collopy Robert C. Marchand Martin Roche Michael A. Mont Arthur L. Malkani
ppnlink	1694585433
callnumber-subject	RD - Surgery
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1
callnumber-a	RD701-811
up_date	2024-07-03T15:13:50.507Z
_version_	1803571304095285248
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ032991665</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503022337.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ032991665</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RD701-811</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peter Y. Joo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aims: The aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: This was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants. Results: There were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and < two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%). Conclusion: RA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">robotics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">total knee arthroplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">total knee replacement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient reported outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient-reported outcome measures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient-reported outcome measures (proms)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">primary total knee arthroplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">total knee arthroplasties (tkas)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">forgotten joint score (fjs)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">koos jr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pain scores</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">joint replacement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">clinical outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Orthopedic surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Antonia F. Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jarod Richards</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tsun Y. Law</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kelly Taylor</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kevin Marchand</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gavin Clark</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dermot Collopy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Robert C. Marchand</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martin Roche</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michael A. Mont</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arthur L. Malkani</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Bone & Joint Open</subfield><subfield code="d">The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2022), 7, Seite 589-595</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1694585433</subfield><subfield code="x">26331462</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:589-595</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/031f10b188d244bd8843d8a51bee5d28</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0076.R1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="h">589-595</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4006443

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?