Experimental Study for Determination of Collar Dimensions Around Bridge Pier
The shape and size of a collar is important to maximize its effect as a scour countermeasure. Current research shows that the depth of the scour hole is decreased by using rectangular collars around circular piers. This study determined the approximate optimum dimensions for rectangular collars to m...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Afshin Jahangirzadeh [verfasserIn] Shatirah Akib [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2015 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering - RTU Press, 2020, 10(2015), 1, Seite 89-96 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:10 ; year:2015 ; number:1 ; pages:89-96 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ033277427 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ033277427 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230307175305.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ033277427 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a TE1-450 | |
050 | 0 | |a TG1-470 | |
100 | 0 | |a Afshin Jahangirzadeh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Experimental Study for Determination of Collar Dimensions Around Bridge Pier |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The shape and size of a collar is important to maximize its effect as a scour countermeasure. Current research shows that the depth of the scour hole is decreased by using rectangular collars around circular piers. This study determined the approximate optimum dimensions for rectangular collars to minimize the temporal trend of scouring around a pier model. Effects of different sizes of rectangular collars on a model pier were investigated both at the upstream and downstream of the flume. It was observed that irrespective of the rectangular collar dimensions the upstream and the downstream were estimated to be 0.86 and 1.42, respectively. The optimum collar width was estimated to be 2.8 times the diameter of the pier. By using this optimized collar dimension, the non-dimensional depth of scour reached a min value of 0.034 at 72 h. The reduction percentage of the scour depth reached 98% at 72 h. | ||
650 | 4 | |a bridge pier model | |
650 | 4 | |a scour | |
650 | 4 | |a rectangular collar | |
650 | 4 | |a collar width | |
650 | 4 | |a downstream collar length | |
650 | 4 | |a upstream collar length | |
653 | 0 | |a Highway engineering. Roads and pavements | |
653 | 0 | |a Bridge engineering | |
700 | 0 | |a Shatirah Akib |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering |d RTU Press, 2020 |g 10(2015), 1, Seite 89-96 |w (DE-627)1726723992 |x 18224288 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |g pages:89-96 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://bjrbe-journals.rtu.lv/article/view/3422 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1822-427X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1822-4288 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2119 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4392 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 10 |j 2015 |e 1 |h 89-96 |
author_variant |
a j aj s a sa |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:18224288:2015----::xeietltdfreemntoocladmni |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
callnumber-subject-code |
TE |
publishDate |
2015 |
allfields |
10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11 doi (DE-627)DOAJ033277427 (DE-599)DOAJ9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TE1-450 TG1-470 Afshin Jahangirzadeh verfasserin aut Experimental Study for Determination of Collar Dimensions Around Bridge Pier 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The shape and size of a collar is important to maximize its effect as a scour countermeasure. Current research shows that the depth of the scour hole is decreased by using rectangular collars around circular piers. This study determined the approximate optimum dimensions for rectangular collars to minimize the temporal trend of scouring around a pier model. Effects of different sizes of rectangular collars on a model pier were investigated both at the upstream and downstream of the flume. It was observed that irrespective of the rectangular collar dimensions the upstream and the downstream were estimated to be 0.86 and 1.42, respectively. The optimum collar width was estimated to be 2.8 times the diameter of the pier. By using this optimized collar dimension, the non-dimensional depth of scour reached a min value of 0.034 at 72 h. The reduction percentage of the scour depth reached 98% at 72 h. bridge pier model scour rectangular collar collar width downstream collar length upstream collar length Highway engineering. Roads and pavements Bridge engineering Shatirah Akib verfasserin aut In The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering RTU Press, 2020 10(2015), 1, Seite 89-96 (DE-627)1726723992 18224288 nnns volume:10 year:2015 number:1 pages:89-96 https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e kostenfrei https://bjrbe-journals.rtu.lv/article/view/3422 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1822-427X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1822-4288 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2015 1 89-96 |
spelling |
10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11 doi (DE-627)DOAJ033277427 (DE-599)DOAJ9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TE1-450 TG1-470 Afshin Jahangirzadeh verfasserin aut Experimental Study for Determination of Collar Dimensions Around Bridge Pier 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The shape and size of a collar is important to maximize its effect as a scour countermeasure. Current research shows that the depth of the scour hole is decreased by using rectangular collars around circular piers. This study determined the approximate optimum dimensions for rectangular collars to minimize the temporal trend of scouring around a pier model. Effects of different sizes of rectangular collars on a model pier were investigated both at the upstream and downstream of the flume. It was observed that irrespective of the rectangular collar dimensions the upstream and the downstream were estimated to be 0.86 and 1.42, respectively. The optimum collar width was estimated to be 2.8 times the diameter of the pier. By using this optimized collar dimension, the non-dimensional depth of scour reached a min value of 0.034 at 72 h. The reduction percentage of the scour depth reached 98% at 72 h. bridge pier model scour rectangular collar collar width downstream collar length upstream collar length Highway engineering. Roads and pavements Bridge engineering Shatirah Akib verfasserin aut In The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering RTU Press, 2020 10(2015), 1, Seite 89-96 (DE-627)1726723992 18224288 nnns volume:10 year:2015 number:1 pages:89-96 https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e kostenfrei https://bjrbe-journals.rtu.lv/article/view/3422 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1822-427X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1822-4288 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2015 1 89-96 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11 doi (DE-627)DOAJ033277427 (DE-599)DOAJ9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TE1-450 TG1-470 Afshin Jahangirzadeh verfasserin aut Experimental Study for Determination of Collar Dimensions Around Bridge Pier 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The shape and size of a collar is important to maximize its effect as a scour countermeasure. Current research shows that the depth of the scour hole is decreased by using rectangular collars around circular piers. This study determined the approximate optimum dimensions for rectangular collars to minimize the temporal trend of scouring around a pier model. Effects of different sizes of rectangular collars on a model pier were investigated both at the upstream and downstream of the flume. It was observed that irrespective of the rectangular collar dimensions the upstream and the downstream were estimated to be 0.86 and 1.42, respectively. The optimum collar width was estimated to be 2.8 times the diameter of the pier. By using this optimized collar dimension, the non-dimensional depth of scour reached a min value of 0.034 at 72 h. The reduction percentage of the scour depth reached 98% at 72 h. bridge pier model scour rectangular collar collar width downstream collar length upstream collar length Highway engineering. Roads and pavements Bridge engineering Shatirah Akib verfasserin aut In The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering RTU Press, 2020 10(2015), 1, Seite 89-96 (DE-627)1726723992 18224288 nnns volume:10 year:2015 number:1 pages:89-96 https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e kostenfrei https://bjrbe-journals.rtu.lv/article/view/3422 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1822-427X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1822-4288 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2015 1 89-96 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11 doi (DE-627)DOAJ033277427 (DE-599)DOAJ9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TE1-450 TG1-470 Afshin Jahangirzadeh verfasserin aut Experimental Study for Determination of Collar Dimensions Around Bridge Pier 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The shape and size of a collar is important to maximize its effect as a scour countermeasure. Current research shows that the depth of the scour hole is decreased by using rectangular collars around circular piers. This study determined the approximate optimum dimensions for rectangular collars to minimize the temporal trend of scouring around a pier model. Effects of different sizes of rectangular collars on a model pier were investigated both at the upstream and downstream of the flume. It was observed that irrespective of the rectangular collar dimensions the upstream and the downstream were estimated to be 0.86 and 1.42, respectively. The optimum collar width was estimated to be 2.8 times the diameter of the pier. By using this optimized collar dimension, the non-dimensional depth of scour reached a min value of 0.034 at 72 h. The reduction percentage of the scour depth reached 98% at 72 h. bridge pier model scour rectangular collar collar width downstream collar length upstream collar length Highway engineering. Roads and pavements Bridge engineering Shatirah Akib verfasserin aut In The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering RTU Press, 2020 10(2015), 1, Seite 89-96 (DE-627)1726723992 18224288 nnns volume:10 year:2015 number:1 pages:89-96 https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e kostenfrei https://bjrbe-journals.rtu.lv/article/view/3422 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1822-427X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1822-4288 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2015 1 89-96 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11 doi (DE-627)DOAJ033277427 (DE-599)DOAJ9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TE1-450 TG1-470 Afshin Jahangirzadeh verfasserin aut Experimental Study for Determination of Collar Dimensions Around Bridge Pier 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The shape and size of a collar is important to maximize its effect as a scour countermeasure. Current research shows that the depth of the scour hole is decreased by using rectangular collars around circular piers. This study determined the approximate optimum dimensions for rectangular collars to minimize the temporal trend of scouring around a pier model. Effects of different sizes of rectangular collars on a model pier were investigated both at the upstream and downstream of the flume. It was observed that irrespective of the rectangular collar dimensions the upstream and the downstream were estimated to be 0.86 and 1.42, respectively. The optimum collar width was estimated to be 2.8 times the diameter of the pier. By using this optimized collar dimension, the non-dimensional depth of scour reached a min value of 0.034 at 72 h. The reduction percentage of the scour depth reached 98% at 72 h. bridge pier model scour rectangular collar collar width downstream collar length upstream collar length Highway engineering. Roads and pavements Bridge engineering Shatirah Akib verfasserin aut In The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering RTU Press, 2020 10(2015), 1, Seite 89-96 (DE-627)1726723992 18224288 nnns volume:10 year:2015 number:1 pages:89-96 https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e kostenfrei https://bjrbe-journals.rtu.lv/article/view/3422 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1822-427X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1822-4288 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2015 1 89-96 |
language |
English |
source |
In The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 10(2015), 1, Seite 89-96 volume:10 year:2015 number:1 pages:89-96 |
sourceStr |
In The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 10(2015), 1, Seite 89-96 volume:10 year:2015 number:1 pages:89-96 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
bridge pier model scour rectangular collar collar width downstream collar length upstream collar length Highway engineering. Roads and pavements Bridge engineering |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Afshin Jahangirzadeh @@aut@@ Shatirah Akib @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1726723992 |
id |
DOAJ033277427 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ033277427</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307175305.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ033277427</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TE1-450</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TG1-470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Afshin Jahangirzadeh</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Experimental Study for Determination of Collar Dimensions Around Bridge Pier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The shape and size of a collar is important to maximize its effect as a scour countermeasure. Current research shows that the depth of the scour hole is decreased by using rectangular collars around circular piers. This study determined the approximate optimum dimensions for rectangular collars to minimize the temporal trend of scouring around a pier model. Effects of different sizes of rectangular collars on a model pier were investigated both at the upstream and downstream of the flume. It was observed that irrespective of the rectangular collar dimensions the upstream and the downstream were estimated to be 0.86 and 1.42, respectively. The optimum collar width was estimated to be 2.8 times the diameter of the pier. By using this optimized collar dimension, the non-dimensional depth of scour reached a min value of 0.034 at 72 h. The reduction percentage of the scour depth reached 98% at 72 h.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bridge pier model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scour</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">rectangular collar</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">collar width</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">downstream collar length</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">upstream collar length</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Highway engineering. Roads and pavements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Bridge engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shatirah Akib</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">RTU Press, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2015), 1, Seite 89-96</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1726723992</subfield><subfield code="x">18224288</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:89-96</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://bjrbe-journals.rtu.lv/article/view/3422</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1822-427X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1822-4288</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">89-96</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
author |
Afshin Jahangirzadeh |
spellingShingle |
Afshin Jahangirzadeh misc TE1-450 misc TG1-470 misc bridge pier model misc scour misc rectangular collar misc collar width misc downstream collar length misc upstream collar length misc Highway engineering. Roads and pavements misc Bridge engineering Experimental Study for Determination of Collar Dimensions Around Bridge Pier |
authorStr |
Afshin Jahangirzadeh |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1726723992 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
TE1-450 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
18224288 |
topic_title |
TE1-450 TG1-470 Experimental Study for Determination of Collar Dimensions Around Bridge Pier bridge pier model scour rectangular collar collar width downstream collar length upstream collar length |
topic |
misc TE1-450 misc TG1-470 misc bridge pier model misc scour misc rectangular collar misc collar width misc downstream collar length misc upstream collar length misc Highway engineering. Roads and pavements misc Bridge engineering |
topic_unstemmed |
misc TE1-450 misc TG1-470 misc bridge pier model misc scour misc rectangular collar misc collar width misc downstream collar length misc upstream collar length misc Highway engineering. Roads and pavements misc Bridge engineering |
topic_browse |
misc TE1-450 misc TG1-470 misc bridge pier model misc scour misc rectangular collar misc collar width misc downstream collar length misc upstream collar length misc Highway engineering. Roads and pavements misc Bridge engineering |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1726723992 |
hierarchy_top_title |
The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1726723992 |
title |
Experimental Study for Determination of Collar Dimensions Around Bridge Pier |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ033277427 (DE-599)DOAJ9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e |
title_full |
Experimental Study for Determination of Collar Dimensions Around Bridge Pier |
author_sort |
Afshin Jahangirzadeh |
journal |
The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering |
journalStr |
The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering |
callnumber-first-code |
T |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2015 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
89 |
author_browse |
Afshin Jahangirzadeh Shatirah Akib |
container_volume |
10 |
class |
TE1-450 TG1-470 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Afshin Jahangirzadeh |
doi_str_mv |
10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
experimental study for determination of collar dimensions around bridge pier |
callnumber |
TE1-450 |
title_auth |
Experimental Study for Determination of Collar Dimensions Around Bridge Pier |
abstract |
The shape and size of a collar is important to maximize its effect as a scour countermeasure. Current research shows that the depth of the scour hole is decreased by using rectangular collars around circular piers. This study determined the approximate optimum dimensions for rectangular collars to minimize the temporal trend of scouring around a pier model. Effects of different sizes of rectangular collars on a model pier were investigated both at the upstream and downstream of the flume. It was observed that irrespective of the rectangular collar dimensions the upstream and the downstream were estimated to be 0.86 and 1.42, respectively. The optimum collar width was estimated to be 2.8 times the diameter of the pier. By using this optimized collar dimension, the non-dimensional depth of scour reached a min value of 0.034 at 72 h. The reduction percentage of the scour depth reached 98% at 72 h. |
abstractGer |
The shape and size of a collar is important to maximize its effect as a scour countermeasure. Current research shows that the depth of the scour hole is decreased by using rectangular collars around circular piers. This study determined the approximate optimum dimensions for rectangular collars to minimize the temporal trend of scouring around a pier model. Effects of different sizes of rectangular collars on a model pier were investigated both at the upstream and downstream of the flume. It was observed that irrespective of the rectangular collar dimensions the upstream and the downstream were estimated to be 0.86 and 1.42, respectively. The optimum collar width was estimated to be 2.8 times the diameter of the pier. By using this optimized collar dimension, the non-dimensional depth of scour reached a min value of 0.034 at 72 h. The reduction percentage of the scour depth reached 98% at 72 h. |
abstract_unstemmed |
The shape and size of a collar is important to maximize its effect as a scour countermeasure. Current research shows that the depth of the scour hole is decreased by using rectangular collars around circular piers. This study determined the approximate optimum dimensions for rectangular collars to minimize the temporal trend of scouring around a pier model. Effects of different sizes of rectangular collars on a model pier were investigated both at the upstream and downstream of the flume. It was observed that irrespective of the rectangular collar dimensions the upstream and the downstream were estimated to be 0.86 and 1.42, respectively. The optimum collar width was estimated to be 2.8 times the diameter of the pier. By using this optimized collar dimension, the non-dimensional depth of scour reached a min value of 0.034 at 72 h. The reduction percentage of the scour depth reached 98% at 72 h. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
1 |
title_short |
Experimental Study for Determination of Collar Dimensions Around Bridge Pier |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11 https://doaj.org/article/9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e https://bjrbe-journals.rtu.lv/article/view/3422 https://doaj.org/toc/1822-427X https://doaj.org/toc/1822-4288 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Shatirah Akib |
author2Str |
Shatirah Akib |
ppnlink |
1726723992 |
callnumber-subject |
TE - Highway Engineering |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11 |
callnumber-a |
TE1-450 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T16:49:30.279Z |
_version_ |
1803577322684547072 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ033277427</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307175305.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230226s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ033277427</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TE1-450</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TG1-470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Afshin Jahangirzadeh</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Experimental Study for Determination of Collar Dimensions Around Bridge Pier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The shape and size of a collar is important to maximize its effect as a scour countermeasure. Current research shows that the depth of the scour hole is decreased by using rectangular collars around circular piers. This study determined the approximate optimum dimensions for rectangular collars to minimize the temporal trend of scouring around a pier model. Effects of different sizes of rectangular collars on a model pier were investigated both at the upstream and downstream of the flume. It was observed that irrespective of the rectangular collar dimensions the upstream and the downstream were estimated to be 0.86 and 1.42, respectively. The optimum collar width was estimated to be 2.8 times the diameter of the pier. By using this optimized collar dimension, the non-dimensional depth of scour reached a min value of 0.034 at 72 h. The reduction percentage of the scour depth reached 98% at 72 h.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bridge pier model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scour</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">rectangular collar</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">collar width</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">downstream collar length</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">upstream collar length</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Highway engineering. Roads and pavements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Bridge engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shatirah Akib</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">RTU Press, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2015), 1, Seite 89-96</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1726723992</subfield><subfield code="x">18224288</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:89-96</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2015.11</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/9e3be2286c674259905639797aa53e1e</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://bjrbe-journals.rtu.lv/article/view/3422</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1822-427X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1822-4288</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">89-96</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400216 |