A Foucauldian Theory of American Islamophobia
With the emergence of ISIS andAmerican public furor over allowing Syrian refugeeslim Americans find themselves oind themselves once again in the cross-hairs of a nation obsessed with searching for answers and someone to blame. I argue that the premise behind American anti-Muslim sentiment is rooted...
Full description
Author: |
SHYAM K. SRIRAM [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Electronic Article |
---|---|
Language: |
Arabic ; English ; Malaysisch |
Published: |
2016 |
---|
Subjects: |
---|
Containing Work: |
In: International Journal of Islamic Thought - Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 2013, 10(2016), Seite 47-54 |
---|---|
Containing Work: |
volume:10 ; year:2016 ; pages:47-54 |
Links: |
https://doaj.org/article/9d9bcd3cee53475aba1eb7bc45ebc42e [Kostenfrei] http://www.ukm.my/ijit/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/IJIT-Vol-10-Dec-2016_5_47-54.pdf [Kostenfrei] Journal toc [Kostenfrei] |
---|
Catalog id: |
DOAJ034028714 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ034028714 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210212093507.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200520s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||ara c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ034028714 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ9d9bcd3cee53475aba1eb7bc45ebc42e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a ara |a eng |a may | ||
050 | 0 | |a BP1-253 | |
100 | 0 | |a SHYAM K. SRIRAM |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Foucauldian Theory of American Islamophobia |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a With the emergence of ISIS andAmerican public furor over allowing Syrian refugeeslim Americans find themselves oind themselves once again in the cross-hairs of a nation obsessed with searching for answers and someone to blame. I argue that the premise behind American anti-Muslim sentiment is rooted in two of Michel Foucault’s concepts -“biopower” and “pastoral power.” This article is divided in two halves. In the first, I argue that American nationalism is articulated in a unique way, particularly through “pastoral power.” In conjunction with an “imagined” American nationhood (Anderson 1983), it has created a state that is often viewed as secular, but is quite Christian ideologically and structurally. Drawing on Göle (1996), I surmise that the Western “culture of confession,” an extension of pastoral power, is incompatible with Islam – or at least is viewed as such. In the second half, I present my main argument towards a new understanding of Foucault’s (1990) biopower in the context of the sovereign and its ability to designate who is “sacred,” a la Agamben (1998). I suggest that a new evaluation of Agamben (1998) should be undertaken to account for the renewed racialization of and discrimination towards American Muslims. | ||
650 | 4 | |a biopower | |
650 | 4 | |a Foucauldian Theory | |
650 | 4 | |a Islamophobia | |
650 | 4 | |a Islam in the United States | |
653 | 0 | |a Islam | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t International Journal of Islamic Thought |d Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 2013 |g 10(2016), Seite 47-54 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000030988 |x 22321314 |7 |||s |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2016 |g pages:47-54 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/9d9bcd3cee53475aba1eb7bc45ebc42e |z Kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.ukm.my/ijit/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/IJIT-Vol-10-Dec-2016_5_47-54.pdf |z Kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2232-1314 |y Journal toc |z Kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2232-1314 |y Journal toc |z Kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
936 | u | w | |d 10 |j 2016 |h 47-54 |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 10 |j 2016 |h 47-54 |