Towards a Unified Framework for Project Success Score Computation in Construction Projects
The discussion of project success has expanded beyond project management and success criteria. The main cause of the failure to evaluate project performance in construction projects is the absence of a shared definition and a common set of criteria for project success. The aim of this paper is to de...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Athanasios Lamprou [verfasserIn] Dimitra G. Vagiona [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: CivilEng - MDPI AG, 2021, 3(2022), 3, Seite 779-793 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:3 ; year:2022 ; number:3 ; pages:779-793 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3390/civileng3030045 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ034092196 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ034092196 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240414205532.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230227s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/civileng3030045 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ034092196 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a TA1-2040 | |
100 | 0 | |a Athanasios Lamprou |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Towards a Unified Framework for Project Success Score Computation in Construction Projects |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The discussion of project success has expanded beyond project management and success criteria. The main cause of the failure to evaluate project performance in construction projects is the absence of a shared definition and a common set of criteria for project success. The aim of this paper is to develop a framework which includes certain success criteria to assess construction projects and allows for the calculation of a Project Success Score (PSS). The Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) approach is adopted and modified appropriately, providing a framework that combines primary and secondary success criteria to compute a comprehensive Project Success Score (PSS). Seventeen (17) success criteria are included in the framework, and their corresponding thresholds are formulated to determine the limits of failure of a project. The final PSS consists of five distinct classes, which range from the level of absolute success (PSS in the range of 9361 to 13,500) to the level of absolute failure (13 to 384). Finally, a web application that simulates the PSS framework is developed. The web application was tested by an end-user, in order to assess its applicability and ease of use, and the facilitation of the whole computation process of PSS was ensured. This paper provides a rational framework through which construction projects can be rapidly assessed, with the aim of highlighting the potential unsuccessful criteria in each project and increasing the probability of more effective project outcomes. | ||
650 | 4 | |a construction projects | |
650 | 4 | |a project success | |
650 | 4 | |a Project Success Score (PSS) | |
650 | 4 | |a success criteria | |
653 | 0 | |a Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) | |
700 | 0 | |a Dimitra G. Vagiona |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t CivilEng |d MDPI AG, 2021 |g 3(2022), 3, Seite 779-793 |w (DE-627)170040184X |x 26734109 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:2022 |g number:3 |g pages:779-793 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng3030045 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4109/3/3/45 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4109 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 3 |j 2022 |e 3 |h 779-793 |
author_variant |
a l al d g v dgv |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:26734109:2022----::oadanfefaeokopoetucssoeoptto |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
callnumber-subject-code |
TA |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.3390/civileng3030045 doi (DE-627)DOAJ034092196 (DE-599)DOAJ5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA1-2040 Athanasios Lamprou verfasserin aut Towards a Unified Framework for Project Success Score Computation in Construction Projects 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The discussion of project success has expanded beyond project management and success criteria. The main cause of the failure to evaluate project performance in construction projects is the absence of a shared definition and a common set of criteria for project success. The aim of this paper is to develop a framework which includes certain success criteria to assess construction projects and allows for the calculation of a Project Success Score (PSS). The Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) approach is adopted and modified appropriately, providing a framework that combines primary and secondary success criteria to compute a comprehensive Project Success Score (PSS). Seventeen (17) success criteria are included in the framework, and their corresponding thresholds are formulated to determine the limits of failure of a project. The final PSS consists of five distinct classes, which range from the level of absolute success (PSS in the range of 9361 to 13,500) to the level of absolute failure (13 to 384). Finally, a web application that simulates the PSS framework is developed. The web application was tested by an end-user, in order to assess its applicability and ease of use, and the facilitation of the whole computation process of PSS was ensured. This paper provides a rational framework through which construction projects can be rapidly assessed, with the aim of highlighting the potential unsuccessful criteria in each project and increasing the probability of more effective project outcomes. construction projects project success Project Success Score (PSS) success criteria Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Dimitra G. Vagiona verfasserin aut In CivilEng MDPI AG, 2021 3(2022), 3, Seite 779-793 (DE-627)170040184X 26734109 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:3 pages:779-793 https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng3030045 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4109/3/3/45 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4109 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 3 2022 3 779-793 |
spelling |
10.3390/civileng3030045 doi (DE-627)DOAJ034092196 (DE-599)DOAJ5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA1-2040 Athanasios Lamprou verfasserin aut Towards a Unified Framework for Project Success Score Computation in Construction Projects 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The discussion of project success has expanded beyond project management and success criteria. The main cause of the failure to evaluate project performance in construction projects is the absence of a shared definition and a common set of criteria for project success. The aim of this paper is to develop a framework which includes certain success criteria to assess construction projects and allows for the calculation of a Project Success Score (PSS). The Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) approach is adopted and modified appropriately, providing a framework that combines primary and secondary success criteria to compute a comprehensive Project Success Score (PSS). Seventeen (17) success criteria are included in the framework, and their corresponding thresholds are formulated to determine the limits of failure of a project. The final PSS consists of five distinct classes, which range from the level of absolute success (PSS in the range of 9361 to 13,500) to the level of absolute failure (13 to 384). Finally, a web application that simulates the PSS framework is developed. The web application was tested by an end-user, in order to assess its applicability and ease of use, and the facilitation of the whole computation process of PSS was ensured. This paper provides a rational framework through which construction projects can be rapidly assessed, with the aim of highlighting the potential unsuccessful criteria in each project and increasing the probability of more effective project outcomes. construction projects project success Project Success Score (PSS) success criteria Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Dimitra G. Vagiona verfasserin aut In CivilEng MDPI AG, 2021 3(2022), 3, Seite 779-793 (DE-627)170040184X 26734109 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:3 pages:779-793 https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng3030045 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4109/3/3/45 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4109 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 3 2022 3 779-793 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3390/civileng3030045 doi (DE-627)DOAJ034092196 (DE-599)DOAJ5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA1-2040 Athanasios Lamprou verfasserin aut Towards a Unified Framework for Project Success Score Computation in Construction Projects 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The discussion of project success has expanded beyond project management and success criteria. The main cause of the failure to evaluate project performance in construction projects is the absence of a shared definition and a common set of criteria for project success. The aim of this paper is to develop a framework which includes certain success criteria to assess construction projects and allows for the calculation of a Project Success Score (PSS). The Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) approach is adopted and modified appropriately, providing a framework that combines primary and secondary success criteria to compute a comprehensive Project Success Score (PSS). Seventeen (17) success criteria are included in the framework, and their corresponding thresholds are formulated to determine the limits of failure of a project. The final PSS consists of five distinct classes, which range from the level of absolute success (PSS in the range of 9361 to 13,500) to the level of absolute failure (13 to 384). Finally, a web application that simulates the PSS framework is developed. The web application was tested by an end-user, in order to assess its applicability and ease of use, and the facilitation of the whole computation process of PSS was ensured. This paper provides a rational framework through which construction projects can be rapidly assessed, with the aim of highlighting the potential unsuccessful criteria in each project and increasing the probability of more effective project outcomes. construction projects project success Project Success Score (PSS) success criteria Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Dimitra G. Vagiona verfasserin aut In CivilEng MDPI AG, 2021 3(2022), 3, Seite 779-793 (DE-627)170040184X 26734109 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:3 pages:779-793 https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng3030045 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4109/3/3/45 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4109 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 3 2022 3 779-793 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3390/civileng3030045 doi (DE-627)DOAJ034092196 (DE-599)DOAJ5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA1-2040 Athanasios Lamprou verfasserin aut Towards a Unified Framework for Project Success Score Computation in Construction Projects 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The discussion of project success has expanded beyond project management and success criteria. The main cause of the failure to evaluate project performance in construction projects is the absence of a shared definition and a common set of criteria for project success. The aim of this paper is to develop a framework which includes certain success criteria to assess construction projects and allows for the calculation of a Project Success Score (PSS). The Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) approach is adopted and modified appropriately, providing a framework that combines primary and secondary success criteria to compute a comprehensive Project Success Score (PSS). Seventeen (17) success criteria are included in the framework, and their corresponding thresholds are formulated to determine the limits of failure of a project. The final PSS consists of five distinct classes, which range from the level of absolute success (PSS in the range of 9361 to 13,500) to the level of absolute failure (13 to 384). Finally, a web application that simulates the PSS framework is developed. The web application was tested by an end-user, in order to assess its applicability and ease of use, and the facilitation of the whole computation process of PSS was ensured. This paper provides a rational framework through which construction projects can be rapidly assessed, with the aim of highlighting the potential unsuccessful criteria in each project and increasing the probability of more effective project outcomes. construction projects project success Project Success Score (PSS) success criteria Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Dimitra G. Vagiona verfasserin aut In CivilEng MDPI AG, 2021 3(2022), 3, Seite 779-793 (DE-627)170040184X 26734109 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:3 pages:779-793 https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng3030045 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4109/3/3/45 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4109 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 3 2022 3 779-793 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3390/civileng3030045 doi (DE-627)DOAJ034092196 (DE-599)DOAJ5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA1-2040 Athanasios Lamprou verfasserin aut Towards a Unified Framework for Project Success Score Computation in Construction Projects 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The discussion of project success has expanded beyond project management and success criteria. The main cause of the failure to evaluate project performance in construction projects is the absence of a shared definition and a common set of criteria for project success. The aim of this paper is to develop a framework which includes certain success criteria to assess construction projects and allows for the calculation of a Project Success Score (PSS). The Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) approach is adopted and modified appropriately, providing a framework that combines primary and secondary success criteria to compute a comprehensive Project Success Score (PSS). Seventeen (17) success criteria are included in the framework, and their corresponding thresholds are formulated to determine the limits of failure of a project. The final PSS consists of five distinct classes, which range from the level of absolute success (PSS in the range of 9361 to 13,500) to the level of absolute failure (13 to 384). Finally, a web application that simulates the PSS framework is developed. The web application was tested by an end-user, in order to assess its applicability and ease of use, and the facilitation of the whole computation process of PSS was ensured. This paper provides a rational framework through which construction projects can be rapidly assessed, with the aim of highlighting the potential unsuccessful criteria in each project and increasing the probability of more effective project outcomes. construction projects project success Project Success Score (PSS) success criteria Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Dimitra G. Vagiona verfasserin aut In CivilEng MDPI AG, 2021 3(2022), 3, Seite 779-793 (DE-627)170040184X 26734109 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:3 pages:779-793 https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng3030045 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4109/3/3/45 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4109 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 3 2022 3 779-793 |
language |
English |
source |
In CivilEng 3(2022), 3, Seite 779-793 volume:3 year:2022 number:3 pages:779-793 |
sourceStr |
In CivilEng 3(2022), 3, Seite 779-793 volume:3 year:2022 number:3 pages:779-793 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
construction projects project success Project Success Score (PSS) success criteria Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
CivilEng |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Athanasios Lamprou @@aut@@ Dimitra G. Vagiona @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
170040184X |
id |
DOAJ034092196 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ034092196</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414205532.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/civileng3030045</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ034092196</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TA1-2040</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Athanasios Lamprou</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Towards a Unified Framework for Project Success Score Computation in Construction Projects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The discussion of project success has expanded beyond project management and success criteria. The main cause of the failure to evaluate project performance in construction projects is the absence of a shared definition and a common set of criteria for project success. The aim of this paper is to develop a framework which includes certain success criteria to assess construction projects and allows for the calculation of a Project Success Score (PSS). The Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) approach is adopted and modified appropriately, providing a framework that combines primary and secondary success criteria to compute a comprehensive Project Success Score (PSS). Seventeen (17) success criteria are included in the framework, and their corresponding thresholds are formulated to determine the limits of failure of a project. The final PSS consists of five distinct classes, which range from the level of absolute success (PSS in the range of 9361 to 13,500) to the level of absolute failure (13 to 384). Finally, a web application that simulates the PSS framework is developed. The web application was tested by an end-user, in order to assess its applicability and ease of use, and the facilitation of the whole computation process of PSS was ensured. This paper provides a rational framework through which construction projects can be rapidly assessed, with the aim of highlighting the potential unsuccessful criteria in each project and increasing the probability of more effective project outcomes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">construction projects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">project success</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Project Success Score (PSS)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">success criteria</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dimitra G. Vagiona</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">CivilEng</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2022), 3, Seite 779-793</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)170040184X</subfield><subfield code="x">26734109</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:779-793</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng3030045</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4109/3/3/45</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4109</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">779-793</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
author |
Athanasios Lamprou |
spellingShingle |
Athanasios Lamprou misc TA1-2040 misc construction projects misc project success misc Project Success Score (PSS) misc success criteria misc Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Towards a Unified Framework for Project Success Score Computation in Construction Projects |
authorStr |
Athanasios Lamprou |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)170040184X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
TA1-2040 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
26734109 |
topic_title |
TA1-2040 Towards a Unified Framework for Project Success Score Computation in Construction Projects construction projects project success Project Success Score (PSS) success criteria |
topic |
misc TA1-2040 misc construction projects misc project success misc Project Success Score (PSS) misc success criteria misc Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
topic_unstemmed |
misc TA1-2040 misc construction projects misc project success misc Project Success Score (PSS) misc success criteria misc Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
topic_browse |
misc TA1-2040 misc construction projects misc project success misc Project Success Score (PSS) misc success criteria misc Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
CivilEng |
hierarchy_parent_id |
170040184X |
hierarchy_top_title |
CivilEng |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)170040184X |
title |
Towards a Unified Framework for Project Success Score Computation in Construction Projects |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ034092196 (DE-599)DOAJ5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586 |
title_full |
Towards a Unified Framework for Project Success Score Computation in Construction Projects |
author_sort |
Athanasios Lamprou |
journal |
CivilEng |
journalStr |
CivilEng |
callnumber-first-code |
T |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
779 |
author_browse |
Athanasios Lamprou Dimitra G. Vagiona |
container_volume |
3 |
class |
TA1-2040 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Athanasios Lamprou |
doi_str_mv |
10.3390/civileng3030045 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
towards a unified framework for project success score computation in construction projects |
callnumber |
TA1-2040 |
title_auth |
Towards a Unified Framework for Project Success Score Computation in Construction Projects |
abstract |
The discussion of project success has expanded beyond project management and success criteria. The main cause of the failure to evaluate project performance in construction projects is the absence of a shared definition and a common set of criteria for project success. The aim of this paper is to develop a framework which includes certain success criteria to assess construction projects and allows for the calculation of a Project Success Score (PSS). The Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) approach is adopted and modified appropriately, providing a framework that combines primary and secondary success criteria to compute a comprehensive Project Success Score (PSS). Seventeen (17) success criteria are included in the framework, and their corresponding thresholds are formulated to determine the limits of failure of a project. The final PSS consists of five distinct classes, which range from the level of absolute success (PSS in the range of 9361 to 13,500) to the level of absolute failure (13 to 384). Finally, a web application that simulates the PSS framework is developed. The web application was tested by an end-user, in order to assess its applicability and ease of use, and the facilitation of the whole computation process of PSS was ensured. This paper provides a rational framework through which construction projects can be rapidly assessed, with the aim of highlighting the potential unsuccessful criteria in each project and increasing the probability of more effective project outcomes. |
abstractGer |
The discussion of project success has expanded beyond project management and success criteria. The main cause of the failure to evaluate project performance in construction projects is the absence of a shared definition and a common set of criteria for project success. The aim of this paper is to develop a framework which includes certain success criteria to assess construction projects and allows for the calculation of a Project Success Score (PSS). The Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) approach is adopted and modified appropriately, providing a framework that combines primary and secondary success criteria to compute a comprehensive Project Success Score (PSS). Seventeen (17) success criteria are included in the framework, and their corresponding thresholds are formulated to determine the limits of failure of a project. The final PSS consists of five distinct classes, which range from the level of absolute success (PSS in the range of 9361 to 13,500) to the level of absolute failure (13 to 384). Finally, a web application that simulates the PSS framework is developed. The web application was tested by an end-user, in order to assess its applicability and ease of use, and the facilitation of the whole computation process of PSS was ensured. This paper provides a rational framework through which construction projects can be rapidly assessed, with the aim of highlighting the potential unsuccessful criteria in each project and increasing the probability of more effective project outcomes. |
abstract_unstemmed |
The discussion of project success has expanded beyond project management and success criteria. The main cause of the failure to evaluate project performance in construction projects is the absence of a shared definition and a common set of criteria for project success. The aim of this paper is to develop a framework which includes certain success criteria to assess construction projects and allows for the calculation of a Project Success Score (PSS). The Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) approach is adopted and modified appropriately, providing a framework that combines primary and secondary success criteria to compute a comprehensive Project Success Score (PSS). Seventeen (17) success criteria are included in the framework, and their corresponding thresholds are formulated to determine the limits of failure of a project. The final PSS consists of five distinct classes, which range from the level of absolute success (PSS in the range of 9361 to 13,500) to the level of absolute failure (13 to 384). Finally, a web application that simulates the PSS framework is developed. The web application was tested by an end-user, in order to assess its applicability and ease of use, and the facilitation of the whole computation process of PSS was ensured. This paper provides a rational framework through which construction projects can be rapidly assessed, with the aim of highlighting the potential unsuccessful criteria in each project and increasing the probability of more effective project outcomes. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
container_issue |
3 |
title_short |
Towards a Unified Framework for Project Success Score Computation in Construction Projects |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng3030045 https://doaj.org/article/5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586 https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4109/3/3/45 https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4109 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Dimitra G. Vagiona |
author2Str |
Dimitra G. Vagiona |
ppnlink |
170040184X |
callnumber-subject |
TA - General and Civil Engineering |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3390/civileng3030045 |
callnumber-a |
TA1-2040 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T21:22:11.006Z |
_version_ |
1803594478133444608 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ034092196</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414205532.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/civileng3030045</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ034092196</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TA1-2040</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Athanasios Lamprou</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Towards a Unified Framework for Project Success Score Computation in Construction Projects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The discussion of project success has expanded beyond project management and success criteria. The main cause of the failure to evaluate project performance in construction projects is the absence of a shared definition and a common set of criteria for project success. The aim of this paper is to develop a framework which includes certain success criteria to assess construction projects and allows for the calculation of a Project Success Score (PSS). The Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) approach is adopted and modified appropriately, providing a framework that combines primary and secondary success criteria to compute a comprehensive Project Success Score (PSS). Seventeen (17) success criteria are included in the framework, and their corresponding thresholds are formulated to determine the limits of failure of a project. The final PSS consists of five distinct classes, which range from the level of absolute success (PSS in the range of 9361 to 13,500) to the level of absolute failure (13 to 384). Finally, a web application that simulates the PSS framework is developed. The web application was tested by an end-user, in order to assess its applicability and ease of use, and the facilitation of the whole computation process of PSS was ensured. This paper provides a rational framework through which construction projects can be rapidly assessed, with the aim of highlighting the potential unsuccessful criteria in each project and increasing the probability of more effective project outcomes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">construction projects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">project success</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Project Success Score (PSS)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">success criteria</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dimitra G. Vagiona</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">CivilEng</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2022), 3, Seite 779-793</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)170040184X</subfield><subfield code="x">26734109</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:779-793</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng3030045</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/5b2d84586c934ee38833720c7ab97586</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4109/3/3/45</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4109</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">779-793</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399207 |