Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations

Optical remote sensing (about 0.4~2.0 μm) indexes of soil moisture (SM) are valuable for some specific applications such as monitoring agricultural drought and downscaling microwave SM, due to their abundant data sources, higher spatial resolution, and easy-to-use features, etc. In this study, we ev...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Hao Sun [verfasserIn] Hao Liu [verfasserIn] Yanhui Ma [verfasserIn] Qunbo Xia [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2021

Schlagwörter:	optical remote sensing soil vegetation water content moisture drought

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Remote Sensing - MDPI AG, 2009, 13(2021), 22, p 4638
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:13 ; year:2021 ; number:22, p 4638

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3390/rs13224638

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ03476710X

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ03476710X
003	DE-627
005	20240412131150.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3390/rs13224638 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ03476710X
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	0		\|a Hao Sun \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations
264		1	\|c 2021
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Optical remote sensing (about 0.4~2.0 μm) indexes of soil moisture (SM) are valuable for some specific applications such as monitoring agricultural drought and downscaling microwave SM, due to their abundant data sources, higher spatial resolution, and easy-to-use features, etc. In this study, we evaluated thirteen typical optical SM indexes with aircraft and in situ observed SM from two field campaigns, the Soil Moisture Active Passive Validation Experiment 2012 (SMAPVEX12) and 2016 (SMAPVEX16) conducted in Manitoba, Canada. MODIS surface reflectance products (MOD09A1) and Sentinel-2 multispectral imager Level-1C data were utilized to calculate the optical SM indexes. The evaluation results demonstrated that (1) the Visible and Shortwave Infrared Drought Index (VSDI) and Optical TRApezoid Model (OPTRAM) outperform the other eleven optical SM indexes as compared with aircraft and in situ observed SM. They also presented well consistence in temporal variation with the in situ observed SM. (2) The VSDI achieved comparable performance with the OPTRAM while the former has very simple calculation expression and the latter requires complex process to determine the dry and wet boundaries. (3) Both the VSDI and OPTRAM utilize two sensitive bands of soil and vegetation moisture, i.e., Red and SWIR bands, whereas the other eleven SM indexes only employ one sensitive band. This may be the main reason of the evaluation results. (4) Based on this recognition, improvements of the VSDI and OPTRAM were created and validated in this study through adding more sensitive band to VSDI and combining NDVI and modified VSDI into a new feature space for calculating the optical SM index as with OPTRAM. The results are conducive to selecting and utilizing the current numerous optical SM indexes for SM and drought monitoring.
650		4	\|a optical remote sensing
650		4	\|a soil
650		4	\|a vegetation
650		4	\|a water content
650		4	\|a moisture
650		4	\|a drought
653		0	\|a Science
653		0	\|a Q
700	0		\|a Hao Liu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yanhui Ma \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Qunbo Xia \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Remote Sensing \|d MDPI AG, 2009 \|g 13(2021), 22, p 4638 \|w (DE-627)608937916 \|w (DE-600)2513863-7 \|x 20724292 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:13 \|g year:2021 \|g number:22, p 4638
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13224638 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/22/4638 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2108
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2119
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4392
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 13 \|j 2021 \|e 22, p 4638

Indexfelder

author_variant	h s hs h l hl y m ym q x qx
matchkey_str	article:20724292:2021----::piarmtsnigneeosimitreautoadmrvmnbsdni
hierarchy_sort_str	2021
publishDate	2021
allfields	10.3390/rs13224638 doi (DE-627)DOAJ03476710X (DE-599)DOAJ6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Hao Sun verfasserin aut Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Optical remote sensing (about 0.4~2.0 μm) indexes of soil moisture (SM) are valuable for some specific applications such as monitoring agricultural drought and downscaling microwave SM, due to their abundant data sources, higher spatial resolution, and easy-to-use features, etc. In this study, we evaluated thirteen typical optical SM indexes with aircraft and in situ observed SM from two field campaigns, the Soil Moisture Active Passive Validation Experiment 2012 (SMAPVEX12) and 2016 (SMAPVEX16) conducted in Manitoba, Canada. MODIS surface reflectance products (MOD09A1) and Sentinel-2 multispectral imager Level-1C data were utilized to calculate the optical SM indexes. The evaluation results demonstrated that (1) the Visible and Shortwave Infrared Drought Index (VSDI) and Optical TRApezoid Model (OPTRAM) outperform the other eleven optical SM indexes as compared with aircraft and in situ observed SM. They also presented well consistence in temporal variation with the in situ observed SM. (2) The VSDI achieved comparable performance with the OPTRAM while the former has very simple calculation expression and the latter requires complex process to determine the dry and wet boundaries. (3) Both the VSDI and OPTRAM utilize two sensitive bands of soil and vegetation moisture, i.e., Red and SWIR bands, whereas the other eleven SM indexes only employ one sensitive band. This may be the main reason of the evaluation results. (4) Based on this recognition, improvements of the VSDI and OPTRAM were created and validated in this study through adding more sensitive band to VSDI and combining NDVI and modified VSDI into a new feature space for calculating the optical SM index as with OPTRAM. The results are conducive to selecting and utilizing the current numerous optical SM indexes for SM and drought monitoring. optical remote sensing soil vegetation water content moisture drought Science Q Hao Liu verfasserin aut Yanhui Ma verfasserin aut Qunbo Xia verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 13(2021), 22, p 4638 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:13 year:2021 number:22, p 4638 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13224638 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/22/4638 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2021 22, p 4638
spelling	10.3390/rs13224638 doi (DE-627)DOAJ03476710X (DE-599)DOAJ6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Hao Sun verfasserin aut Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Optical remote sensing (about 0.4~2.0 μm) indexes of soil moisture (SM) are valuable for some specific applications such as monitoring agricultural drought and downscaling microwave SM, due to their abundant data sources, higher spatial resolution, and easy-to-use features, etc. In this study, we evaluated thirteen typical optical SM indexes with aircraft and in situ observed SM from two field campaigns, the Soil Moisture Active Passive Validation Experiment 2012 (SMAPVEX12) and 2016 (SMAPVEX16) conducted in Manitoba, Canada. MODIS surface reflectance products (MOD09A1) and Sentinel-2 multispectral imager Level-1C data were utilized to calculate the optical SM indexes. The evaluation results demonstrated that (1) the Visible and Shortwave Infrared Drought Index (VSDI) and Optical TRApezoid Model (OPTRAM) outperform the other eleven optical SM indexes as compared with aircraft and in situ observed SM. They also presented well consistence in temporal variation with the in situ observed SM. (2) The VSDI achieved comparable performance with the OPTRAM while the former has very simple calculation expression and the latter requires complex process to determine the dry and wet boundaries. (3) Both the VSDI and OPTRAM utilize two sensitive bands of soil and vegetation moisture, i.e., Red and SWIR bands, whereas the other eleven SM indexes only employ one sensitive band. This may be the main reason of the evaluation results. (4) Based on this recognition, improvements of the VSDI and OPTRAM were created and validated in this study through adding more sensitive band to VSDI and combining NDVI and modified VSDI into a new feature space for calculating the optical SM index as with OPTRAM. The results are conducive to selecting and utilizing the current numerous optical SM indexes for SM and drought monitoring. optical remote sensing soil vegetation water content moisture drought Science Q Hao Liu verfasserin aut Yanhui Ma verfasserin aut Qunbo Xia verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 13(2021), 22, p 4638 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:13 year:2021 number:22, p 4638 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13224638 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/22/4638 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2021 22, p 4638
allfields_unstemmed	10.3390/rs13224638 doi (DE-627)DOAJ03476710X (DE-599)DOAJ6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Hao Sun verfasserin aut Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Optical remote sensing (about 0.4~2.0 μm) indexes of soil moisture (SM) are valuable for some specific applications such as monitoring agricultural drought and downscaling microwave SM, due to their abundant data sources, higher spatial resolution, and easy-to-use features, etc. In this study, we evaluated thirteen typical optical SM indexes with aircraft and in situ observed SM from two field campaigns, the Soil Moisture Active Passive Validation Experiment 2012 (SMAPVEX12) and 2016 (SMAPVEX16) conducted in Manitoba, Canada. MODIS surface reflectance products (MOD09A1) and Sentinel-2 multispectral imager Level-1C data were utilized to calculate the optical SM indexes. The evaluation results demonstrated that (1) the Visible and Shortwave Infrared Drought Index (VSDI) and Optical TRApezoid Model (OPTRAM) outperform the other eleven optical SM indexes as compared with aircraft and in situ observed SM. They also presented well consistence in temporal variation with the in situ observed SM. (2) The VSDI achieved comparable performance with the OPTRAM while the former has very simple calculation expression and the latter requires complex process to determine the dry and wet boundaries. (3) Both the VSDI and OPTRAM utilize two sensitive bands of soil and vegetation moisture, i.e., Red and SWIR bands, whereas the other eleven SM indexes only employ one sensitive band. This may be the main reason of the evaluation results. (4) Based on this recognition, improvements of the VSDI and OPTRAM were created and validated in this study through adding more sensitive band to VSDI and combining NDVI and modified VSDI into a new feature space for calculating the optical SM index as with OPTRAM. The results are conducive to selecting and utilizing the current numerous optical SM indexes for SM and drought monitoring. optical remote sensing soil vegetation water content moisture drought Science Q Hao Liu verfasserin aut Yanhui Ma verfasserin aut Qunbo Xia verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 13(2021), 22, p 4638 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:13 year:2021 number:22, p 4638 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13224638 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/22/4638 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2021 22, p 4638
allfieldsGer	10.3390/rs13224638 doi (DE-627)DOAJ03476710X (DE-599)DOAJ6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Hao Sun verfasserin aut Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Optical remote sensing (about 0.4~2.0 μm) indexes of soil moisture (SM) are valuable for some specific applications such as monitoring agricultural drought and downscaling microwave SM, due to their abundant data sources, higher spatial resolution, and easy-to-use features, etc. In this study, we evaluated thirteen typical optical SM indexes with aircraft and in situ observed SM from two field campaigns, the Soil Moisture Active Passive Validation Experiment 2012 (SMAPVEX12) and 2016 (SMAPVEX16) conducted in Manitoba, Canada. MODIS surface reflectance products (MOD09A1) and Sentinel-2 multispectral imager Level-1C data were utilized to calculate the optical SM indexes. The evaluation results demonstrated that (1) the Visible and Shortwave Infrared Drought Index (VSDI) and Optical TRApezoid Model (OPTRAM) outperform the other eleven optical SM indexes as compared with aircraft and in situ observed SM. They also presented well consistence in temporal variation with the in situ observed SM. (2) The VSDI achieved comparable performance with the OPTRAM while the former has very simple calculation expression and the latter requires complex process to determine the dry and wet boundaries. (3) Both the VSDI and OPTRAM utilize two sensitive bands of soil and vegetation moisture, i.e., Red and SWIR bands, whereas the other eleven SM indexes only employ one sensitive band. This may be the main reason of the evaluation results. (4) Based on this recognition, improvements of the VSDI and OPTRAM were created and validated in this study through adding more sensitive band to VSDI and combining NDVI and modified VSDI into a new feature space for calculating the optical SM index as with OPTRAM. The results are conducive to selecting and utilizing the current numerous optical SM indexes for SM and drought monitoring. optical remote sensing soil vegetation water content moisture drought Science Q Hao Liu verfasserin aut Yanhui Ma verfasserin aut Qunbo Xia verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 13(2021), 22, p 4638 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:13 year:2021 number:22, p 4638 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13224638 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/22/4638 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2021 22, p 4638
allfieldsSound	10.3390/rs13224638 doi (DE-627)DOAJ03476710X (DE-599)DOAJ6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Hao Sun verfasserin aut Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Optical remote sensing (about 0.4~2.0 μm) indexes of soil moisture (SM) are valuable for some specific applications such as monitoring agricultural drought and downscaling microwave SM, due to their abundant data sources, higher spatial resolution, and easy-to-use features, etc. In this study, we evaluated thirteen typical optical SM indexes with aircraft and in situ observed SM from two field campaigns, the Soil Moisture Active Passive Validation Experiment 2012 (SMAPVEX12) and 2016 (SMAPVEX16) conducted in Manitoba, Canada. MODIS surface reflectance products (MOD09A1) and Sentinel-2 multispectral imager Level-1C data were utilized to calculate the optical SM indexes. The evaluation results demonstrated that (1) the Visible and Shortwave Infrared Drought Index (VSDI) and Optical TRApezoid Model (OPTRAM) outperform the other eleven optical SM indexes as compared with aircraft and in situ observed SM. They also presented well consistence in temporal variation with the in situ observed SM. (2) The VSDI achieved comparable performance with the OPTRAM while the former has very simple calculation expression and the latter requires complex process to determine the dry and wet boundaries. (3) Both the VSDI and OPTRAM utilize two sensitive bands of soil and vegetation moisture, i.e., Red and SWIR bands, whereas the other eleven SM indexes only employ one sensitive band. This may be the main reason of the evaluation results. (4) Based on this recognition, improvements of the VSDI and OPTRAM were created and validated in this study through adding more sensitive band to VSDI and combining NDVI and modified VSDI into a new feature space for calculating the optical SM index as with OPTRAM. The results are conducive to selecting and utilizing the current numerous optical SM indexes for SM and drought monitoring. optical remote sensing soil vegetation water content moisture drought Science Q Hao Liu verfasserin aut Yanhui Ma verfasserin aut Qunbo Xia verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 13(2021), 22, p 4638 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:13 year:2021 number:22, p 4638 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13224638 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/22/4638 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2021 22, p 4638
language	English
source	In Remote Sensing 13(2021), 22, p 4638 volume:13 year:2021 number:22, p 4638
sourceStr	In Remote Sensing 13(2021), 22, p 4638 volume:13 year:2021 number:22, p 4638
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	optical remote sensing soil vegetation water content moisture drought Science Q
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Remote Sensing
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Hao Sun @@aut@@ Hao Liu @@aut@@ Yanhui Ma @@aut@@ Qunbo Xia @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	608937916
id	DOAJ03476710X
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ03476710X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240412131150.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/rs13224638</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ03476710X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hao Sun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Optical remote sensing (about 0.4~2.0 μm) indexes of soil moisture (SM) are valuable for some specific applications such as monitoring agricultural drought and downscaling microwave SM, due to their abundant data sources, higher spatial resolution, and easy-to-use features, etc. In this study, we evaluated thirteen typical optical SM indexes with aircraft and in situ observed SM from two field campaigns, the Soil Moisture Active Passive Validation Experiment 2012 (SMAPVEX12) and 2016 (SMAPVEX16) conducted in Manitoba, Canada. MODIS surface reflectance products (MOD09A1) and Sentinel-2 multispectral imager Level-1C data were utilized to calculate the optical SM indexes. The evaluation results demonstrated that (1) the Visible and Shortwave Infrared Drought Index (VSDI) and Optical TRApezoid Model (OPTRAM) outperform the other eleven optical SM indexes as compared with aircraft and in situ observed SM. They also presented well consistence in temporal variation with the in situ observed SM. (2) The VSDI achieved comparable performance with the OPTRAM while the former has very simple calculation expression and the latter requires complex process to determine the dry and wet boundaries. (3) Both the VSDI and OPTRAM utilize two sensitive bands of soil and vegetation moisture, i.e., Red and SWIR bands, whereas the other eleven SM indexes only employ one sensitive band. This may be the main reason of the evaluation results. (4) Based on this recognition, improvements of the VSDI and OPTRAM were created and validated in this study through adding more sensitive band to VSDI and combining NDVI and modified VSDI into a new feature space for calculating the optical SM index as with OPTRAM. The results are conducive to selecting and utilizing the current numerous optical SM indexes for SM and drought monitoring.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">optical remote sensing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">soil</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">vegetation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">water content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">moisture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">drought</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Q</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hao Liu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yanhui Ma</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Qunbo Xia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Remote Sensing</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2021), 22, p 4638</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)608937916</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2513863-7</subfield><subfield code="x">20724292</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:22, p 4638</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13224638</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/22/4638</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">22, p 4638</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Hao Sun
spellingShingle	Hao Sun misc optical remote sensing misc soil misc vegetation misc water content misc moisture misc drought misc Science misc Q Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations
authorStr	Hao Sun
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)608937916
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	20724292
topic_title	Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations optical remote sensing soil vegetation water content moisture drought
topic	misc optical remote sensing misc soil misc vegetation misc water content misc moisture misc drought misc Science misc Q
topic_unstemmed	misc optical remote sensing misc soil misc vegetation misc water content misc moisture misc drought misc Science misc Q
topic_browse	misc optical remote sensing misc soil misc vegetation misc water content misc moisture misc drought misc Science misc Q
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Remote Sensing
hierarchy_parent_id	608937916
hierarchy_top_title	Remote Sensing
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7
title	Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ03476710X (DE-599)DOAJ6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702
title_full	Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations
author_sort	Hao Sun
journal	Remote Sensing
journalStr	Remote Sensing
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2021
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Hao Sun Hao Liu Yanhui Ma Qunbo Xia
container_volume	13
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Hao Sun
doi_str_mv	10.3390/rs13224638
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	optical remote sensing indexes of soil moisture: evaluation and improvement based on aircraft experiment observations
title_auth	Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations
abstract	Optical remote sensing (about 0.4~2.0 μm) indexes of soil moisture (SM) are valuable for some specific applications such as monitoring agricultural drought and downscaling microwave SM, due to their abundant data sources, higher spatial resolution, and easy-to-use features, etc. In this study, we evaluated thirteen typical optical SM indexes with aircraft and in situ observed SM from two field campaigns, the Soil Moisture Active Passive Validation Experiment 2012 (SMAPVEX12) and 2016 (SMAPVEX16) conducted in Manitoba, Canada. MODIS surface reflectance products (MOD09A1) and Sentinel-2 multispectral imager Level-1C data were utilized to calculate the optical SM indexes. The evaluation results demonstrated that (1) the Visible and Shortwave Infrared Drought Index (VSDI) and Optical TRApezoid Model (OPTRAM) outperform the other eleven optical SM indexes as compared with aircraft and in situ observed SM. They also presented well consistence in temporal variation with the in situ observed SM. (2) The VSDI achieved comparable performance with the OPTRAM while the former has very simple calculation expression and the latter requires complex process to determine the dry and wet boundaries. (3) Both the VSDI and OPTRAM utilize two sensitive bands of soil and vegetation moisture, i.e., Red and SWIR bands, whereas the other eleven SM indexes only employ one sensitive band. This may be the main reason of the evaluation results. (4) Based on this recognition, improvements of the VSDI and OPTRAM were created and validated in this study through adding more sensitive band to VSDI and combining NDVI and modified VSDI into a new feature space for calculating the optical SM index as with OPTRAM. The results are conducive to selecting and utilizing the current numerous optical SM indexes for SM and drought monitoring.
abstractGer	Optical remote sensing (about 0.4~2.0 μm) indexes of soil moisture (SM) are valuable for some specific applications such as monitoring agricultural drought and downscaling microwave SM, due to their abundant data sources, higher spatial resolution, and easy-to-use features, etc. In this study, we evaluated thirteen typical optical SM indexes with aircraft and in situ observed SM from two field campaigns, the Soil Moisture Active Passive Validation Experiment 2012 (SMAPVEX12) and 2016 (SMAPVEX16) conducted in Manitoba, Canada. MODIS surface reflectance products (MOD09A1) and Sentinel-2 multispectral imager Level-1C data were utilized to calculate the optical SM indexes. The evaluation results demonstrated that (1) the Visible and Shortwave Infrared Drought Index (VSDI) and Optical TRApezoid Model (OPTRAM) outperform the other eleven optical SM indexes as compared with aircraft and in situ observed SM. They also presented well consistence in temporal variation with the in situ observed SM. (2) The VSDI achieved comparable performance with the OPTRAM while the former has very simple calculation expression and the latter requires complex process to determine the dry and wet boundaries. (3) Both the VSDI and OPTRAM utilize two sensitive bands of soil and vegetation moisture, i.e., Red and SWIR bands, whereas the other eleven SM indexes only employ one sensitive band. This may be the main reason of the evaluation results. (4) Based on this recognition, improvements of the VSDI and OPTRAM were created and validated in this study through adding more sensitive band to VSDI and combining NDVI and modified VSDI into a new feature space for calculating the optical SM index as with OPTRAM. The results are conducive to selecting and utilizing the current numerous optical SM indexes for SM and drought monitoring.
abstract_unstemmed	Optical remote sensing (about 0.4~2.0 μm) indexes of soil moisture (SM) are valuable for some specific applications such as monitoring agricultural drought and downscaling microwave SM, due to their abundant data sources, higher spatial resolution, and easy-to-use features, etc. In this study, we evaluated thirteen typical optical SM indexes with aircraft and in situ observed SM from two field campaigns, the Soil Moisture Active Passive Validation Experiment 2012 (SMAPVEX12) and 2016 (SMAPVEX16) conducted in Manitoba, Canada. MODIS surface reflectance products (MOD09A1) and Sentinel-2 multispectral imager Level-1C data were utilized to calculate the optical SM indexes. The evaluation results demonstrated that (1) the Visible and Shortwave Infrared Drought Index (VSDI) and Optical TRApezoid Model (OPTRAM) outperform the other eleven optical SM indexes as compared with aircraft and in situ observed SM. They also presented well consistence in temporal variation with the in situ observed SM. (2) The VSDI achieved comparable performance with the OPTRAM while the former has very simple calculation expression and the latter requires complex process to determine the dry and wet boundaries. (3) Both the VSDI and OPTRAM utilize two sensitive bands of soil and vegetation moisture, i.e., Red and SWIR bands, whereas the other eleven SM indexes only employ one sensitive band. This may be the main reason of the evaluation results. (4) Based on this recognition, improvements of the VSDI and OPTRAM were created and validated in this study through adding more sensitive band to VSDI and combining NDVI and modified VSDI into a new feature space for calculating the optical SM index as with OPTRAM. The results are conducive to selecting and utilizing the current numerous optical SM indexes for SM and drought monitoring.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	22, p 4638
title_short	Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations
url	https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13224638 https://doaj.org/article/6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702 https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/22/4638 https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292
remote_bool	true
author2	Hao Liu Yanhui Ma Qunbo Xia
author2Str	Hao Liu Yanhui Ma Qunbo Xia
ppnlink	608937916
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3390/rs13224638
up_date	2024-07-04T00:32:48.719Z
_version_	1803606471444791296
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ03476710X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240412131150.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/rs13224638</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ03476710X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hao Sun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Optical remote sensing (about 0.4~2.0 μm) indexes of soil moisture (SM) are valuable for some specific applications such as monitoring agricultural drought and downscaling microwave SM, due to their abundant data sources, higher spatial resolution, and easy-to-use features, etc. In this study, we evaluated thirteen typical optical SM indexes with aircraft and in situ observed SM from two field campaigns, the Soil Moisture Active Passive Validation Experiment 2012 (SMAPVEX12) and 2016 (SMAPVEX16) conducted in Manitoba, Canada. MODIS surface reflectance products (MOD09A1) and Sentinel-2 multispectral imager Level-1C data were utilized to calculate the optical SM indexes. The evaluation results demonstrated that (1) the Visible and Shortwave Infrared Drought Index (VSDI) and Optical TRApezoid Model (OPTRAM) outperform the other eleven optical SM indexes as compared with aircraft and in situ observed SM. They also presented well consistence in temporal variation with the in situ observed SM. (2) The VSDI achieved comparable performance with the OPTRAM while the former has very simple calculation expression and the latter requires complex process to determine the dry and wet boundaries. (3) Both the VSDI and OPTRAM utilize two sensitive bands of soil and vegetation moisture, i.e., Red and SWIR bands, whereas the other eleven SM indexes only employ one sensitive band. This may be the main reason of the evaluation results. (4) Based on this recognition, improvements of the VSDI and OPTRAM were created and validated in this study through adding more sensitive band to VSDI and combining NDVI and modified VSDI into a new feature space for calculating the optical SM index as with OPTRAM. The results are conducive to selecting and utilizing the current numerous optical SM indexes for SM and drought monitoring.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">optical remote sensing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">soil</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">vegetation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">water content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">moisture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">drought</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Q</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hao Liu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yanhui Ma</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Qunbo Xia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Remote Sensing</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2021), 22, p 4638</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)608937916</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2513863-7</subfield><subfield code="x">20724292</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:22, p 4638</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13224638</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6a56251caad74c73bfee57adca890702</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/22/4638</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">22, p 4638</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3990917

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?