Jurisdiction of Lack of Accountability for Parliament Representativeness
Parliamentary immunity of MPs has been accepted in laws of most countries. This immunity is manifested in two ways: One way is “lack of responsibility”, meaning that parliament member can freely express his idea as he fulfils his duty of representation and he is not prosecuted and seized because of...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Zahra Sadat Raee Varaee [verfasserIn] Mohammad Javad Arasta [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Persisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: سیاست متعالیه - Political Studies Association of the Seminary, 2019, 5(2017), 18, Seite 145-160 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:5 ; year:2017 ; number:18 ; pages:145-160 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ034910867 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ034910867 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230307193040.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||per c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ034910867 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a per | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a JA1-92 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a BP1-253 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Zahra Sadat Raee Varaee |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Jurisdiction of Lack of Accountability for Parliament Representativeness |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Parliamentary immunity of MPs has been accepted in laws of most countries. This immunity is manifested in two ways: One way is “lack of responsibility”, meaning that parliament member can freely express his idea as he fulfils his duty of representation and he is not prosecuted and seized because of it. Another way is “nonoffensiveness”, meaning that if an MP commits a crime, he may be sued by permission and approval of parliament. In the post-revolution Iran, majority of members of Assembly of Elites of the Constitution opposed the principle of “non-offensiveness”, calling it against principle of “all are equal in the eyes of law” and<br /<inconsistent with “Rules of Islam”. Thus, “lack of responsibility” of MPs was only reflected in the principle 86 of the Constitution. Jurists disagree over limits of “lack of responsibility”. Some hold that lack of responsibility excludes crimes. Council of Guardians has approved the recent idea in its interpretative idea. Some others believe that “lack of responsibility” includes crimes that are committed in line with fulfilling representational duties. This article has accepted the latter idea as regards to rule of subject-order proportion. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Non-offensiveness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Lack of Responsibility | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Parliamentary Immunity | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Political science (General) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Islam | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Mohammad Javad Arasta |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t سیاست متعالیه |d Political Studies Association of the Seminary, 2019 |g 5(2017), 18, Seite 145-160 |w (DE-627)1760603619 |x 26455811 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2017 |g number:18 |g pages:145-160 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://sm.psas.ir/article_30388_56c72384a0afbb7a2ff5ba4a3cbc7fd6.pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2345-2676 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2645-5811 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 5 |j 2017 |e 18 |h 145-160 | ||
| author_variant |
z s r v zsrv m j a mja |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:26455811:2017----::uidcinfakfconaiiyoprimnr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
JA |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ034910867 (DE-599)DOAJ593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per JA1-92 BP1-253 Zahra Sadat Raee Varaee verfasserin aut Jurisdiction of Lack of Accountability for Parliament Representativeness 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Parliamentary immunity of MPs has been accepted in laws of most countries. This immunity is manifested in two ways: One way is “lack of responsibility”, meaning that parliament member can freely express his idea as he fulfils his duty of representation and he is not prosecuted and seized because of it. Another way is “nonoffensiveness”, meaning that if an MP commits a crime, he may be sued by permission and approval of parliament. In the post-revolution Iran, majority of members of Assembly of Elites of the Constitution opposed the principle of “non-offensiveness”, calling it against principle of “all are equal in the eyes of law” and<br /<inconsistent with “Rules of Islam”. Thus, “lack of responsibility” of MPs was only reflected in the principle 86 of the Constitution. Jurists disagree over limits of “lack of responsibility”. Some hold that lack of responsibility excludes crimes. Council of Guardians has approved the recent idea in its interpretative idea. Some others believe that “lack of responsibility” includes crimes that are committed in line with fulfilling representational duties. This article has accepted the latter idea as regards to rule of subject-order proportion. Non-offensiveness Lack of Responsibility Parliamentary Immunity Political science (General) Islam Mohammad Javad Arasta verfasserin aut In سیاست متعالیه Political Studies Association of the Seminary, 2019 5(2017), 18, Seite 145-160 (DE-627)1760603619 26455811 nnns volume:5 year:2017 number:18 pages:145-160 https://doaj.org/article/593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c kostenfrei http://sm.psas.ir/article_30388_56c72384a0afbb7a2ff5ba4a3cbc7fd6.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-2676 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2645-5811 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 5 2017 18 145-160 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ034910867 (DE-599)DOAJ593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per JA1-92 BP1-253 Zahra Sadat Raee Varaee verfasserin aut Jurisdiction of Lack of Accountability for Parliament Representativeness 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Parliamentary immunity of MPs has been accepted in laws of most countries. This immunity is manifested in two ways: One way is “lack of responsibility”, meaning that parliament member can freely express his idea as he fulfils his duty of representation and he is not prosecuted and seized because of it. Another way is “nonoffensiveness”, meaning that if an MP commits a crime, he may be sued by permission and approval of parliament. In the post-revolution Iran, majority of members of Assembly of Elites of the Constitution opposed the principle of “non-offensiveness”, calling it against principle of “all are equal in the eyes of law” and<br /<inconsistent with “Rules of Islam”. Thus, “lack of responsibility” of MPs was only reflected in the principle 86 of the Constitution. Jurists disagree over limits of “lack of responsibility”. Some hold that lack of responsibility excludes crimes. Council of Guardians has approved the recent idea in its interpretative idea. Some others believe that “lack of responsibility” includes crimes that are committed in line with fulfilling representational duties. This article has accepted the latter idea as regards to rule of subject-order proportion. Non-offensiveness Lack of Responsibility Parliamentary Immunity Political science (General) Islam Mohammad Javad Arasta verfasserin aut In سیاست متعالیه Political Studies Association of the Seminary, 2019 5(2017), 18, Seite 145-160 (DE-627)1760603619 26455811 nnns volume:5 year:2017 number:18 pages:145-160 https://doaj.org/article/593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c kostenfrei http://sm.psas.ir/article_30388_56c72384a0afbb7a2ff5ba4a3cbc7fd6.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-2676 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2645-5811 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 5 2017 18 145-160 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ034910867 (DE-599)DOAJ593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per JA1-92 BP1-253 Zahra Sadat Raee Varaee verfasserin aut Jurisdiction of Lack of Accountability for Parliament Representativeness 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Parliamentary immunity of MPs has been accepted in laws of most countries. This immunity is manifested in two ways: One way is “lack of responsibility”, meaning that parliament member can freely express his idea as he fulfils his duty of representation and he is not prosecuted and seized because of it. Another way is “nonoffensiveness”, meaning that if an MP commits a crime, he may be sued by permission and approval of parliament. In the post-revolution Iran, majority of members of Assembly of Elites of the Constitution opposed the principle of “non-offensiveness”, calling it against principle of “all are equal in the eyes of law” and<br /<inconsistent with “Rules of Islam”. Thus, “lack of responsibility” of MPs was only reflected in the principle 86 of the Constitution. Jurists disagree over limits of “lack of responsibility”. Some hold that lack of responsibility excludes crimes. Council of Guardians has approved the recent idea in its interpretative idea. Some others believe that “lack of responsibility” includes crimes that are committed in line with fulfilling representational duties. This article has accepted the latter idea as regards to rule of subject-order proportion. Non-offensiveness Lack of Responsibility Parliamentary Immunity Political science (General) Islam Mohammad Javad Arasta verfasserin aut In سیاست متعالیه Political Studies Association of the Seminary, 2019 5(2017), 18, Seite 145-160 (DE-627)1760603619 26455811 nnns volume:5 year:2017 number:18 pages:145-160 https://doaj.org/article/593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c kostenfrei http://sm.psas.ir/article_30388_56c72384a0afbb7a2ff5ba4a3cbc7fd6.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-2676 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2645-5811 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 5 2017 18 145-160 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ034910867 (DE-599)DOAJ593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per JA1-92 BP1-253 Zahra Sadat Raee Varaee verfasserin aut Jurisdiction of Lack of Accountability for Parliament Representativeness 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Parliamentary immunity of MPs has been accepted in laws of most countries. This immunity is manifested in two ways: One way is “lack of responsibility”, meaning that parliament member can freely express his idea as he fulfils his duty of representation and he is not prosecuted and seized because of it. Another way is “nonoffensiveness”, meaning that if an MP commits a crime, he may be sued by permission and approval of parliament. In the post-revolution Iran, majority of members of Assembly of Elites of the Constitution opposed the principle of “non-offensiveness”, calling it against principle of “all are equal in the eyes of law” and<br /<inconsistent with “Rules of Islam”. Thus, “lack of responsibility” of MPs was only reflected in the principle 86 of the Constitution. Jurists disagree over limits of “lack of responsibility”. Some hold that lack of responsibility excludes crimes. Council of Guardians has approved the recent idea in its interpretative idea. Some others believe that “lack of responsibility” includes crimes that are committed in line with fulfilling representational duties. This article has accepted the latter idea as regards to rule of subject-order proportion. Non-offensiveness Lack of Responsibility Parliamentary Immunity Political science (General) Islam Mohammad Javad Arasta verfasserin aut In سیاست متعالیه Political Studies Association of the Seminary, 2019 5(2017), 18, Seite 145-160 (DE-627)1760603619 26455811 nnns volume:5 year:2017 number:18 pages:145-160 https://doaj.org/article/593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c kostenfrei http://sm.psas.ir/article_30388_56c72384a0afbb7a2ff5ba4a3cbc7fd6.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-2676 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2645-5811 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 5 2017 18 145-160 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ034910867 (DE-599)DOAJ593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per JA1-92 BP1-253 Zahra Sadat Raee Varaee verfasserin aut Jurisdiction of Lack of Accountability for Parliament Representativeness 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Parliamentary immunity of MPs has been accepted in laws of most countries. This immunity is manifested in two ways: One way is “lack of responsibility”, meaning that parliament member can freely express his idea as he fulfils his duty of representation and he is not prosecuted and seized because of it. Another way is “nonoffensiveness”, meaning that if an MP commits a crime, he may be sued by permission and approval of parliament. In the post-revolution Iran, majority of members of Assembly of Elites of the Constitution opposed the principle of “non-offensiveness”, calling it against principle of “all are equal in the eyes of law” and<br /<inconsistent with “Rules of Islam”. Thus, “lack of responsibility” of MPs was only reflected in the principle 86 of the Constitution. Jurists disagree over limits of “lack of responsibility”. Some hold that lack of responsibility excludes crimes. Council of Guardians has approved the recent idea in its interpretative idea. Some others believe that “lack of responsibility” includes crimes that are committed in line with fulfilling representational duties. This article has accepted the latter idea as regards to rule of subject-order proportion. Non-offensiveness Lack of Responsibility Parliamentary Immunity Political science (General) Islam Mohammad Javad Arasta verfasserin aut In سیاست متعالیه Political Studies Association of the Seminary, 2019 5(2017), 18, Seite 145-160 (DE-627)1760603619 26455811 nnns volume:5 year:2017 number:18 pages:145-160 https://doaj.org/article/593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c kostenfrei http://sm.psas.ir/article_30388_56c72384a0afbb7a2ff5ba4a3cbc7fd6.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-2676 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2645-5811 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 5 2017 18 145-160 |
| language |
Persian |
| source |
In سیاست متعالیه 5(2017), 18, Seite 145-160 volume:5 year:2017 number:18 pages:145-160 |
| sourceStr |
In سیاست متعالیه 5(2017), 18, Seite 145-160 volume:5 year:2017 number:18 pages:145-160 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Non-offensiveness Lack of Responsibility Parliamentary Immunity Political science (General) Islam |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
سیاست متعالیه |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Zahra Sadat Raee Varaee @@aut@@ Mohammad Javad Arasta @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760603619 |
| id |
DOAJ034910867 |
| language_de |
persisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ034910867</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307193040.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||per c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ034910867</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JA1-92</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BP1-253</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zahra Sadat Raee Varaee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Jurisdiction of Lack of Accountability for Parliament Representativeness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Parliamentary immunity of MPs has been accepted in laws of most countries. This immunity is manifested in two ways: One way is “lack of responsibility”, meaning that parliament member can freely express his idea as he fulfils his duty of representation and he is not prosecuted and seized because of it. Another way is “nonoffensiveness”, meaning that if an MP commits a crime, he may be sued by permission and approval of parliament. In the post-revolution Iran, majority of members of Assembly of Elites of the Constitution opposed the principle of “non-offensiveness”, calling it against principle of “all are equal in the eyes of law” and<br /<inconsistent with “Rules of Islam”. Thus, “lack of responsibility” of MPs was only reflected in the principle 86 of the Constitution. Jurists disagree over limits of “lack of responsibility”. Some hold that lack of responsibility excludes crimes. Council of Guardians has approved the recent idea in its interpretative idea. Some others believe that “lack of responsibility” includes crimes that are committed in line with fulfilling representational duties. This article has accepted the latter idea as regards to rule of subject-order proportion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Non-offensiveness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lack of Responsibility</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Parliamentary Immunity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political science (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Islam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Javad Arasta</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">سیاست متعالیه</subfield><subfield code="d">Political Studies Association of the Seminary, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2017), 18, Seite 145-160</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760603619</subfield><subfield code="x">26455811</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:18</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:145-160</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://sm.psas.ir/article_30388_56c72384a0afbb7a2ff5ba4a3cbc7fd6.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2345-2676</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2645-5811</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">18</subfield><subfield code="h">145-160</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
J - Political Science |
| author |
Zahra Sadat Raee Varaee |
| spellingShingle |
Zahra Sadat Raee Varaee misc JA1-92 misc BP1-253 misc Non-offensiveness misc Lack of Responsibility misc Parliamentary Immunity misc Political science (General) misc Islam Jurisdiction of Lack of Accountability for Parliament Representativeness |
| authorStr |
Zahra Sadat Raee Varaee |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760603619 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
JA1-92 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
26455811 |
| topic_title |
JA1-92 BP1-253 Jurisdiction of Lack of Accountability for Parliament Representativeness Non-offensiveness Lack of Responsibility Parliamentary Immunity |
| topic |
misc JA1-92 misc BP1-253 misc Non-offensiveness misc Lack of Responsibility misc Parliamentary Immunity misc Political science (General) misc Islam |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc JA1-92 misc BP1-253 misc Non-offensiveness misc Lack of Responsibility misc Parliamentary Immunity misc Political science (General) misc Islam |
| topic_browse |
misc JA1-92 misc BP1-253 misc Non-offensiveness misc Lack of Responsibility misc Parliamentary Immunity misc Political science (General) misc Islam |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
سیاست متعالیه |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760603619 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
سیاست متعالیه |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760603619 |
| title |
Jurisdiction of Lack of Accountability for Parliament Representativeness |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ034910867 (DE-599)DOAJ593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c |
| title_full |
Jurisdiction of Lack of Accountability for Parliament Representativeness |
| author_sort |
Zahra Sadat Raee Varaee |
| journal |
سیاست متعالیه |
| journalStr |
سیاست متعالیه |
| callnumber-first-code |
J |
| lang_code |
per |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
145 |
| author_browse |
Zahra Sadat Raee Varaee Mohammad Javad Arasta |
| container_volume |
5 |
| class |
JA1-92 BP1-253 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Zahra Sadat Raee Varaee |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
jurisdiction of lack of accountability for parliament representativeness |
| callnumber |
JA1-92 |
| title_auth |
Jurisdiction of Lack of Accountability for Parliament Representativeness |
| abstract |
Parliamentary immunity of MPs has been accepted in laws of most countries. This immunity is manifested in two ways: One way is “lack of responsibility”, meaning that parliament member can freely express his idea as he fulfils his duty of representation and he is not prosecuted and seized because of it. Another way is “nonoffensiveness”, meaning that if an MP commits a crime, he may be sued by permission and approval of parliament. In the post-revolution Iran, majority of members of Assembly of Elites of the Constitution opposed the principle of “non-offensiveness”, calling it against principle of “all are equal in the eyes of law” and<br /<inconsistent with “Rules of Islam”. Thus, “lack of responsibility” of MPs was only reflected in the principle 86 of the Constitution. Jurists disagree over limits of “lack of responsibility”. Some hold that lack of responsibility excludes crimes. Council of Guardians has approved the recent idea in its interpretative idea. Some others believe that “lack of responsibility” includes crimes that are committed in line with fulfilling representational duties. This article has accepted the latter idea as regards to rule of subject-order proportion. |
| abstractGer |
Parliamentary immunity of MPs has been accepted in laws of most countries. This immunity is manifested in two ways: One way is “lack of responsibility”, meaning that parliament member can freely express his idea as he fulfils his duty of representation and he is not prosecuted and seized because of it. Another way is “nonoffensiveness”, meaning that if an MP commits a crime, he may be sued by permission and approval of parliament. In the post-revolution Iran, majority of members of Assembly of Elites of the Constitution opposed the principle of “non-offensiveness”, calling it against principle of “all are equal in the eyes of law” and<br /<inconsistent with “Rules of Islam”. Thus, “lack of responsibility” of MPs was only reflected in the principle 86 of the Constitution. Jurists disagree over limits of “lack of responsibility”. Some hold that lack of responsibility excludes crimes. Council of Guardians has approved the recent idea in its interpretative idea. Some others believe that “lack of responsibility” includes crimes that are committed in line with fulfilling representational duties. This article has accepted the latter idea as regards to rule of subject-order proportion. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Parliamentary immunity of MPs has been accepted in laws of most countries. This immunity is manifested in two ways: One way is “lack of responsibility”, meaning that parliament member can freely express his idea as he fulfils his duty of representation and he is not prosecuted and seized because of it. Another way is “nonoffensiveness”, meaning that if an MP commits a crime, he may be sued by permission and approval of parliament. In the post-revolution Iran, majority of members of Assembly of Elites of the Constitution opposed the principle of “non-offensiveness”, calling it against principle of “all are equal in the eyes of law” and<br /<inconsistent with “Rules of Islam”. Thus, “lack of responsibility” of MPs was only reflected in the principle 86 of the Constitution. Jurists disagree over limits of “lack of responsibility”. Some hold that lack of responsibility excludes crimes. Council of Guardians has approved the recent idea in its interpretative idea. Some others believe that “lack of responsibility” includes crimes that are committed in line with fulfilling representational duties. This article has accepted the latter idea as regards to rule of subject-order proportion. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
18 |
| title_short |
Jurisdiction of Lack of Accountability for Parliament Representativeness |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c http://sm.psas.ir/article_30388_56c72384a0afbb7a2ff5ba4a3cbc7fd6.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2345-2676 https://doaj.org/toc/2645-5811 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Mohammad Javad Arasta |
| author2Str |
Mohammad Javad Arasta |
| ppnlink |
1760603619 |
| callnumber-subject |
JA - Political Science |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| callnumber-a |
JA1-92 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T01:05:04.011Z |
| _version_ |
1803608500745535488 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ034910867</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307193040.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||per c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ034910867</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JA1-92</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BP1-253</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zahra Sadat Raee Varaee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Jurisdiction of Lack of Accountability for Parliament Representativeness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Parliamentary immunity of MPs has been accepted in laws of most countries. This immunity is manifested in two ways: One way is “lack of responsibility”, meaning that parliament member can freely express his idea as he fulfils his duty of representation and he is not prosecuted and seized because of it. Another way is “nonoffensiveness”, meaning that if an MP commits a crime, he may be sued by permission and approval of parliament. In the post-revolution Iran, majority of members of Assembly of Elites of the Constitution opposed the principle of “non-offensiveness”, calling it against principle of “all are equal in the eyes of law” and<br /<inconsistent with “Rules of Islam”. Thus, “lack of responsibility” of MPs was only reflected in the principle 86 of the Constitution. Jurists disagree over limits of “lack of responsibility”. Some hold that lack of responsibility excludes crimes. Council of Guardians has approved the recent idea in its interpretative idea. Some others believe that “lack of responsibility” includes crimes that are committed in line with fulfilling representational duties. This article has accepted the latter idea as regards to rule of subject-order proportion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Non-offensiveness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lack of Responsibility</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Parliamentary Immunity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political science (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Islam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Javad Arasta</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">سیاست متعالیه</subfield><subfield code="d">Political Studies Association of the Seminary, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2017), 18, Seite 145-160</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760603619</subfield><subfield code="x">26455811</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:18</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:145-160</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/593527b6de9742248e17ecd7f86f415c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://sm.psas.ir/article_30388_56c72384a0afbb7a2ff5ba4a3cbc7fd6.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2345-2676</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2645-5811</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">18</subfield><subfield code="h">145-160</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400179 |