INCURSIUNI ANALITICE ASUPRA REALIZĂRII ACTELOR DE DISPOZIȚIE ALE DEBITORULUI ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE POTRIVIT DREPTULUI ROMÂNESC ȘI CELUI DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA

<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Prezentul studiu constituie o primă încercare de a nuanța, sub aspect comparativ, unele acte de dispoziție ale debitorului realizate în procedura de executare silită a hotărârilor judecătorești în materie civilă care n-au fost cuprinse în câmpul vizual al legiuitorului la reglementarea principiului disponibilității, dar care prin esența lor derivă din varietatea drepturilor puse la îndemâna debitorului la etapa de executare a hotărârilor judecătorești.</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Modul de exercitare a acestor acte a fost analizat prin prisma prevederilor noului Cod de procedură civilă al României </span<<span lang="RO"<și ale Codului de executare al Republicii Moldova. Apreciind finalitățile juridice ale fiecărui act de dispoziție al debitorului în raport cu reglementările de rigoare, au fost identificate unele obscurități legale ce pot crea în practică diferite dificultăți în realizarea corespunzătoare a activităților execuționale, ceea ce în consecință afectează executarea în termen rezonabil a hotărârilor judecătorești.<strong<</strong<</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<strong<<span lang="RO"<ANALITICAL INCURSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEBITOR’S ACTS OF DISPOZITION IN THE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE ACCORDINC TO THE ROMAIAN LAW AND THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA</span<</strong<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<This survey is a first attempt to underline from a comparative point of view some debtor disposal documents, performed into the procedure of forced execution of judicial judgment in civil matter which were ignored by the lawmaker within the regulation of the principle of availability, but which derive from the rights variety the debtor is entitled when enforcing the judicial judgments. </span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<During this subject approach there were identified under the principle of availability the disposal documents of the debtor that can be enforced in the procedure of forced execution, analyzing from a comparative point of view their <span<enforcement, according to provision of the Civil Procedure Code of Romania and the Enforcement Code of the Republicof Moldova. Analyzing the judicial objectives of each disposal document, comparative to regulations in force there were</span< identified some legal obscurities that could cause within practice different difficulties when pursuing the performing activities, and could affect the execution within a reasonable time of judicial judgments. </span<</p< Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Anatolie BĂNĂRESCU [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch ; Rumänisch ; Russisch

Erschienen:	2017

Schlagwörter:	law, creditor, debtor, enforceable document, forced execution, voluntary execution, principle of availability, judicial judgment, incidents during forced execution, instituting the procedure of forced execution, the deferral of procedure of forced execut

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale - Moldova State University, 2015, (2017), 3 (103)
Übergeordnetes Werk:	year:2017 ; number:3 (103)

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ034936521

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ034936521
003	DE-627
005	20230502143259.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ034936521
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng \|a rum \|a rus
100	0		\|a Anatolie BĂNĂRESCU \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a INCURSIUNI ANALITICE ASUPRA REALIZĂRII ACTELOR DE DISPOZIȚIE ALE DEBITORULUI ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE POTRIVIT DREPTULUI ROMÂNESC ȘI CELUI DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA
264		1	\|c 2017
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a <p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Prezentul studiu constituie o primă încercare de a nuanța, sub aspect comparativ, unele acte de dispoziție ale debitorului realizate în procedura de executare silită a hotărârilor judecătorești în materie civilă care n-au fost cuprinse în câmpul vizual al legiuitorului la reglementarea principiului disponibilității, dar care prin esența lor derivă din varietatea drepturilor puse la îndemâna debitorului la etapa de executare a hotărârilor judecătorești.</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Modul de exercitare a acestor acte a fost analizat prin prisma prevederilor noului Cod de procedură civilă al României </span<<span lang="RO"<și ale Codului de executare al Republicii Moldova. Apreciind finalitățile juridice ale fiecărui act de dispoziție al debitorului în raport cu reglementările de rigoare, au fost identificate unele obscurități legale ce pot crea în practică diferite dificultăți în realizarea corespunzătoare a activităților execuționale, ceea ce în consecință afectează executarea în termen rezonabil a hotărârilor judecătorești.<strong<</strong<</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<strong<<span lang="RO"<ANALITICAL INCURSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEBITOR’S ACTS OF DISPOZITION IN THE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE ACCORDINC TO THE ROMAIAN LAW AND THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA</span<</strong<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<This survey is a first attempt to underline from a comparative point of view some debtor disposal documents, performed into the procedure of forced execution of judicial judgment in civil matter which were ignored by the lawmaker within the regulation of the principle of availability, but which derive from the rights variety the debtor is entitled when enforcing the judicial judgments. </span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<During this subject approach there were identified under the principle of availability the disposal documents of the debtor that can be enforced in the procedure of forced execution, analyzing from a comparative point of view their <span<enforcement, according to provision of the Civil Procedure Code of Romania and the Enforcement Code of the Republicof Moldova. Analyzing the judicial objectives of each disposal document, comparative to regulations in force there were</span< identified some legal obscurities that could cause within practice different difficulties when pursuing the performing activities, and could affect the execution within a reasonable time of judicial judgments. </span<</p<
650		4	\|a law, creditor, debtor, enforceable document, forced execution, voluntary execution, principle of availability, judicial judgment, incidents during forced execution, instituting the procedure of forced execution, the deferral of procedure of forced execut
653		0	\|a Social Sciences
653		0	\|a H
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale \|d Moldova State University, 2015 \|g (2017), 3 (103) \|w (DE-627)828163898 \|w (DE-600)2825221-4 \|x 23451017 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g year:2017 \|g number:3 (103)
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://ojs.studiamsu.eu/index.php/social/article/view/780 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1814-3199 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2345-1017 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|j 2017 \|e 3 (103)

Indexfelder

author_variant	a b ab
matchkey_str	article:23451017:2017----::nusuinltcaurrairiceoddsoieldbtrlipoeuaexctrptiidetl
hierarchy_sort_str	2017
publishDate	2017
allfields	(DE-627)DOAJ034936521 (DE-599)DOAJ908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rum rus Anatolie BĂNĂRESCU verfasserin aut INCURSIUNI ANALITICE ASUPRA REALIZĂRII ACTELOR DE DISPOZIȚIE ALE DEBITORULUI ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE POTRIVIT DREPTULUI ROMÂNESC ȘI CELUI DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Prezentul studiu constituie o primă încercare de a nuanța, sub aspect comparativ, unele acte de dispoziție ale debitorului realizate în procedura de executare silită a hotărârilor judecătorești în materie civilă care n-au fost cuprinse în câmpul vizual al legiuitorului la reglementarea principiului disponibilității, dar care prin esența lor derivă din varietatea drepturilor puse la îndemâna debitorului la etapa de executare a hotărârilor judecătorești.</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Modul de exercitare a acestor acte a fost analizat prin prisma prevederilor noului Cod de procedură civilă al României </span<<span lang="RO"<și ale Codului de executare al Republicii Moldova. Apreciind finalitățile juridice ale fiecărui act de dispoziție al debitorului în raport cu reglementările de rigoare, au fost identificate unele obscurități legale ce pot crea în practică diferite dificultăți în realizarea corespunzătoare a activităților execuționale, ceea ce în consecință afectează executarea în termen rezonabil a hotărârilor judecătorești.<strong<</strong<</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<strong<<span lang="RO"<ANALITICAL INCURSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEBITOR’S ACTS OF DISPOZITION IN THE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE ACCORDINC TO THE ROMAIAN LAW AND THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA</span<</strong<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<This survey is a first attempt to underline from a comparative point of view some debtor disposal documents, performed into the procedure of forced execution of judicial judgment in civil matter which were ignored by the lawmaker within the regulation of the principle of availability, but which derive from the rights variety the debtor is entitled when enforcing the judicial judgments. </span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<During this subject approach there were identified under the principle of availability the disposal documents of the debtor that can be enforced in the procedure of forced execution, analyzing from a comparative point of view their <span<enforcement, according to provision of the Civil Procedure Code of Romania and the Enforcement Code of the Republicof Moldova. Analyzing the judicial objectives of each disposal document, comparative to regulations in force there were</span< identified some legal obscurities that could cause within practice different difficulties when pursuing the performing activities, and could affect the execution within a reasonable time of judicial judgments. </span<</p< law, creditor, debtor, enforceable document, forced execution, voluntary execution, principle of availability, judicial judgment, incidents during forced execution, instituting the procedure of forced execution, the deferral of procedure of forced execut Social Sciences H In Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale Moldova State University, 2015 (2017), 3 (103) (DE-627)828163898 (DE-600)2825221-4 23451017 nnns year:2017 number:3 (103) https://doaj.org/article/908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3 kostenfrei http://ojs.studiamsu.eu/index.php/social/article/view/780 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1814-3199 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-1017 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2017 3 (103)
spelling	(DE-627)DOAJ034936521 (DE-599)DOAJ908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rum rus Anatolie BĂNĂRESCU verfasserin aut INCURSIUNI ANALITICE ASUPRA REALIZĂRII ACTELOR DE DISPOZIȚIE ALE DEBITORULUI ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE POTRIVIT DREPTULUI ROMÂNESC ȘI CELUI DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Prezentul studiu constituie o primă încercare de a nuanța, sub aspect comparativ, unele acte de dispoziție ale debitorului realizate în procedura de executare silită a hotărârilor judecătorești în materie civilă care n-au fost cuprinse în câmpul vizual al legiuitorului la reglementarea principiului disponibilității, dar care prin esența lor derivă din varietatea drepturilor puse la îndemâna debitorului la etapa de executare a hotărârilor judecătorești.</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Modul de exercitare a acestor acte a fost analizat prin prisma prevederilor noului Cod de procedură civilă al României </span<<span lang="RO"<și ale Codului de executare al Republicii Moldova. Apreciind finalitățile juridice ale fiecărui act de dispoziție al debitorului în raport cu reglementările de rigoare, au fost identificate unele obscurități legale ce pot crea în practică diferite dificultăți în realizarea corespunzătoare a activităților execuționale, ceea ce în consecință afectează executarea în termen rezonabil a hotărârilor judecătorești.<strong<</strong<</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<strong<<span lang="RO"<ANALITICAL INCURSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEBITOR’S ACTS OF DISPOZITION IN THE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE ACCORDINC TO THE ROMAIAN LAW AND THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA</span<</strong<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<This survey is a first attempt to underline from a comparative point of view some debtor disposal documents, performed into the procedure of forced execution of judicial judgment in civil matter which were ignored by the lawmaker within the regulation of the principle of availability, but which derive from the rights variety the debtor is entitled when enforcing the judicial judgments. </span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<During this subject approach there were identified under the principle of availability the disposal documents of the debtor that can be enforced in the procedure of forced execution, analyzing from a comparative point of view their <span<enforcement, according to provision of the Civil Procedure Code of Romania and the Enforcement Code of the Republicof Moldova. Analyzing the judicial objectives of each disposal document, comparative to regulations in force there were</span< identified some legal obscurities that could cause within practice different difficulties when pursuing the performing activities, and could affect the execution within a reasonable time of judicial judgments. </span<</p< law, creditor, debtor, enforceable document, forced execution, voluntary execution, principle of availability, judicial judgment, incidents during forced execution, instituting the procedure of forced execution, the deferral of procedure of forced execut Social Sciences H In Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale Moldova State University, 2015 (2017), 3 (103) (DE-627)828163898 (DE-600)2825221-4 23451017 nnns year:2017 number:3 (103) https://doaj.org/article/908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3 kostenfrei http://ojs.studiamsu.eu/index.php/social/article/view/780 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1814-3199 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-1017 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2017 3 (103)
allfields_unstemmed	(DE-627)DOAJ034936521 (DE-599)DOAJ908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rum rus Anatolie BĂNĂRESCU verfasserin aut INCURSIUNI ANALITICE ASUPRA REALIZĂRII ACTELOR DE DISPOZIȚIE ALE DEBITORULUI ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE POTRIVIT DREPTULUI ROMÂNESC ȘI CELUI DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Prezentul studiu constituie o primă încercare de a nuanța, sub aspect comparativ, unele acte de dispoziție ale debitorului realizate în procedura de executare silită a hotărârilor judecătorești în materie civilă care n-au fost cuprinse în câmpul vizual al legiuitorului la reglementarea principiului disponibilității, dar care prin esența lor derivă din varietatea drepturilor puse la îndemâna debitorului la etapa de executare a hotărârilor judecătorești.</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Modul de exercitare a acestor acte a fost analizat prin prisma prevederilor noului Cod de procedură civilă al României </span<<span lang="RO"<și ale Codului de executare al Republicii Moldova. Apreciind finalitățile juridice ale fiecărui act de dispoziție al debitorului în raport cu reglementările de rigoare, au fost identificate unele obscurități legale ce pot crea în practică diferite dificultăți în realizarea corespunzătoare a activităților execuționale, ceea ce în consecință afectează executarea în termen rezonabil a hotărârilor judecătorești.<strong<</strong<</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<strong<<span lang="RO"<ANALITICAL INCURSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEBITOR’S ACTS OF DISPOZITION IN THE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE ACCORDINC TO THE ROMAIAN LAW AND THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA</span<</strong<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<This survey is a first attempt to underline from a comparative point of view some debtor disposal documents, performed into the procedure of forced execution of judicial judgment in civil matter which were ignored by the lawmaker within the regulation of the principle of availability, but which derive from the rights variety the debtor is entitled when enforcing the judicial judgments. </span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<During this subject approach there were identified under the principle of availability the disposal documents of the debtor that can be enforced in the procedure of forced execution, analyzing from a comparative point of view their <span<enforcement, according to provision of the Civil Procedure Code of Romania and the Enforcement Code of the Republicof Moldova. Analyzing the judicial objectives of each disposal document, comparative to regulations in force there were</span< identified some legal obscurities that could cause within practice different difficulties when pursuing the performing activities, and could affect the execution within a reasonable time of judicial judgments. </span<</p< law, creditor, debtor, enforceable document, forced execution, voluntary execution, principle of availability, judicial judgment, incidents during forced execution, instituting the procedure of forced execution, the deferral of procedure of forced execut Social Sciences H In Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale Moldova State University, 2015 (2017), 3 (103) (DE-627)828163898 (DE-600)2825221-4 23451017 nnns year:2017 number:3 (103) https://doaj.org/article/908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3 kostenfrei http://ojs.studiamsu.eu/index.php/social/article/view/780 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1814-3199 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-1017 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2017 3 (103)
allfieldsGer	(DE-627)DOAJ034936521 (DE-599)DOAJ908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rum rus Anatolie BĂNĂRESCU verfasserin aut INCURSIUNI ANALITICE ASUPRA REALIZĂRII ACTELOR DE DISPOZIȚIE ALE DEBITORULUI ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE POTRIVIT DREPTULUI ROMÂNESC ȘI CELUI DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Prezentul studiu constituie o primă încercare de a nuanța, sub aspect comparativ, unele acte de dispoziție ale debitorului realizate în procedura de executare silită a hotărârilor judecătorești în materie civilă care n-au fost cuprinse în câmpul vizual al legiuitorului la reglementarea principiului disponibilității, dar care prin esența lor derivă din varietatea drepturilor puse la îndemâna debitorului la etapa de executare a hotărârilor judecătorești.</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Modul de exercitare a acestor acte a fost analizat prin prisma prevederilor noului Cod de procedură civilă al României </span<<span lang="RO"<și ale Codului de executare al Republicii Moldova. Apreciind finalitățile juridice ale fiecărui act de dispoziție al debitorului în raport cu reglementările de rigoare, au fost identificate unele obscurități legale ce pot crea în practică diferite dificultăți în realizarea corespunzătoare a activităților execuționale, ceea ce în consecință afectează executarea în termen rezonabil a hotărârilor judecătorești.<strong<</strong<</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<strong<<span lang="RO"<ANALITICAL INCURSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEBITOR’S ACTS OF DISPOZITION IN THE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE ACCORDINC TO THE ROMAIAN LAW AND THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA</span<</strong<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<This survey is a first attempt to underline from a comparative point of view some debtor disposal documents, performed into the procedure of forced execution of judicial judgment in civil matter which were ignored by the lawmaker within the regulation of the principle of availability, but which derive from the rights variety the debtor is entitled when enforcing the judicial judgments. </span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<During this subject approach there were identified under the principle of availability the disposal documents of the debtor that can be enforced in the procedure of forced execution, analyzing from a comparative point of view their <span<enforcement, according to provision of the Civil Procedure Code of Romania and the Enforcement Code of the Republicof Moldova. Analyzing the judicial objectives of each disposal document, comparative to regulations in force there were</span< identified some legal obscurities that could cause within practice different difficulties when pursuing the performing activities, and could affect the execution within a reasonable time of judicial judgments. </span<</p< law, creditor, debtor, enforceable document, forced execution, voluntary execution, principle of availability, judicial judgment, incidents during forced execution, instituting the procedure of forced execution, the deferral of procedure of forced execut Social Sciences H In Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale Moldova State University, 2015 (2017), 3 (103) (DE-627)828163898 (DE-600)2825221-4 23451017 nnns year:2017 number:3 (103) https://doaj.org/article/908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3 kostenfrei http://ojs.studiamsu.eu/index.php/social/article/view/780 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1814-3199 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-1017 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2017 3 (103)
allfieldsSound	(DE-627)DOAJ034936521 (DE-599)DOAJ908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rum rus Anatolie BĂNĂRESCU verfasserin aut INCURSIUNI ANALITICE ASUPRA REALIZĂRII ACTELOR DE DISPOZIȚIE ALE DEBITORULUI ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE POTRIVIT DREPTULUI ROMÂNESC ȘI CELUI DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Prezentul studiu constituie o primă încercare de a nuanța, sub aspect comparativ, unele acte de dispoziție ale debitorului realizate în procedura de executare silită a hotărârilor judecătorești în materie civilă care n-au fost cuprinse în câmpul vizual al legiuitorului la reglementarea principiului disponibilității, dar care prin esența lor derivă din varietatea drepturilor puse la îndemâna debitorului la etapa de executare a hotărârilor judecătorești.</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Modul de exercitare a acestor acte a fost analizat prin prisma prevederilor noului Cod de procedură civilă al României </span<<span lang="RO"<și ale Codului de executare al Republicii Moldova. Apreciind finalitățile juridice ale fiecărui act de dispoziție al debitorului în raport cu reglementările de rigoare, au fost identificate unele obscurități legale ce pot crea în practică diferite dificultăți în realizarea corespunzătoare a activităților execuționale, ceea ce în consecință afectează executarea în termen rezonabil a hotărârilor judecătorești.<strong<</strong<</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<strong<<span lang="RO"<ANALITICAL INCURSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEBITOR’S ACTS OF DISPOZITION IN THE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE ACCORDINC TO THE ROMAIAN LAW AND THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA</span<</strong<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<This survey is a first attempt to underline from a comparative point of view some debtor disposal documents, performed into the procedure of forced execution of judicial judgment in civil matter which were ignored by the lawmaker within the regulation of the principle of availability, but which derive from the rights variety the debtor is entitled when enforcing the judicial judgments. </span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<During this subject approach there were identified under the principle of availability the disposal documents of the debtor that can be enforced in the procedure of forced execution, analyzing from a comparative point of view their <span<enforcement, according to provision of the Civil Procedure Code of Romania and the Enforcement Code of the Republicof Moldova. Analyzing the judicial objectives of each disposal document, comparative to regulations in force there were</span< identified some legal obscurities that could cause within practice different difficulties when pursuing the performing activities, and could affect the execution within a reasonable time of judicial judgments. </span<</p< law, creditor, debtor, enforceable document, forced execution, voluntary execution, principle of availability, judicial judgment, incidents during forced execution, instituting the procedure of forced execution, the deferral of procedure of forced execut Social Sciences H In Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale Moldova State University, 2015 (2017), 3 (103) (DE-627)828163898 (DE-600)2825221-4 23451017 nnns year:2017 number:3 (103) https://doaj.org/article/908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3 kostenfrei http://ojs.studiamsu.eu/index.php/social/article/view/780 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1814-3199 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-1017 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2017 3 (103)
language	English Romanian Russian
source	In Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale (2017), 3 (103) year:2017 number:3 (103)
sourceStr	In Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale (2017), 3 (103) year:2017 number:3 (103)
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	law, creditor, debtor, enforceable document, forced execution, voluntary execution, principle of availability, judicial judgment, incidents during forced execution, instituting the procedure of forced execution, the deferral of procedure of forced execut Social Sciences H
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Anatolie BĂNĂRESCU @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	828163898
id	DOAJ034936521
language_de	englisch rumaenisch russisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ034936521</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502143259.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ034936521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rum</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anatolie BĂNĂRESCU</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">INCURSIUNI ANALITICE ASUPRA REALIZĂRII ACTELOR DE DISPOZIȚIE ALE DEBITORULUI ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE POTRIVIT DREPTULUI ROMÂNESC ȘI CELUI DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"><p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Prezentul studiu constituie o primă încercare de a nuanța, sub aspect comparativ, unele acte de dispoziție ale debitorului realizate în procedura de executare silită a hotărârilor judecătorești în materie civilă care n-au fost cuprinse în câmpul vizual al legiuitorului la reglementarea principiului disponibilității, dar care prin esența lor derivă din varietatea drepturilor puse la îndemâna debitorului la etapa de executare a hotărârilor judecătorești.</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Modul de exercitare a acestor acte a fost analizat prin prisma prevederilor noului Cod de procedură civilă al României </span<<span lang="RO"<și ale Codului de executare al Republicii Moldova. Apreciind finalitățile juridice ale fiecărui act de dispoziție al debitorului în raport cu reglementările de rigoare, au fost identificate unele obscurități legale ce pot crea în practică diferite dificultăți în realizarea corespunzătoare a activităților execuționale, ceea ce în consecință afectează executarea în termen rezonabil a hotărârilor judecătorești.<strong<</strong<</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<strong<<span lang="RO"<ANALITICAL INCURSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEBITOR’S ACTS OF DISPOZITION IN THE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE ACCORDINC TO THE ROMAIAN LAW AND THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA</span<</strong<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<This survey is a first attempt to underline from a comparative point of view some debtor disposal documents, performed into the procedure of forced execution of judicial judgment in civil matter which were ignored by the lawmaker within the regulation of the principle of availability, but which derive from the rights variety the debtor is entitled when enforcing the judicial judgments. </span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<During this subject approach there were identified under the principle of availability the disposal documents of the debtor that can be enforced in the procedure of forced execution, analyzing from a comparative point of view their <span<enforcement, according to provision of the Civil Procedure Code of Romania and the Enforcement Code of the Republicof Moldova. Analyzing the judicial objectives of each disposal document, comparative to regulations in force there were</span< identified some legal obscurities that could cause within practice different difficulties when pursuing the performing activities, and could affect the execution within a reasonable time of judicial judgments. </span<</p<</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">law, creditor, debtor, enforceable document, forced execution, voluntary execution, principle of availability, judicial judgment, incidents during forced execution, instituting the procedure of forced execution, the deferral of procedure of forced execut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social Sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">H</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale</subfield><subfield code="d">Moldova State University, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">(2017), 3 (103)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)828163898</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2825221-4</subfield><subfield code="x">23451017</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3 (103)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://ojs.studiamsu.eu/index.php/social/article/view/780</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1814-3199</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2345-1017</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">3 (103)</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Anatolie BĂNĂRESCU
spellingShingle	Anatolie BĂNĂRESCU misc law, creditor, debtor, enforceable document, forced execution, voluntary execution, principle of availability, judicial judgment, incidents during forced execution, instituting the procedure of forced execution, the deferral of procedure of forced execut misc Social Sciences misc H INCURSIUNI ANALITICE ASUPRA REALIZĂRII ACTELOR DE DISPOZIȚIE ALE DEBITORULUI ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE POTRIVIT DREPTULUI ROMÂNESC ȘI CELUI DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA
authorStr	Anatolie BĂNĂRESCU
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)828163898
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	23451017
topic_title	INCURSIUNI ANALITICE ASUPRA REALIZĂRII ACTELOR DE DISPOZIȚIE ALE DEBITORULUI ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE POTRIVIT DREPTULUI ROMÂNESC ȘI CELUI DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA law, creditor, debtor, enforceable document, forced execution, voluntary execution, principle of availability, judicial judgment, incidents during forced execution, instituting the procedure of forced execution, the deferral of procedure of forced execut
topic	misc law, creditor, debtor, enforceable document, forced execution, voluntary execution, principle of availability, judicial judgment, incidents during forced execution, instituting the procedure of forced execution, the deferral of procedure of forced execut misc Social Sciences misc H
topic_unstemmed	misc law, creditor, debtor, enforceable document, forced execution, voluntary execution, principle of availability, judicial judgment, incidents during forced execution, instituting the procedure of forced execution, the deferral of procedure of forced execut misc Social Sciences misc H
topic_browse	misc law, creditor, debtor, enforceable document, forced execution, voluntary execution, principle of availability, judicial judgment, incidents during forced execution, instituting the procedure of forced execution, the deferral of procedure of forced execut misc Social Sciences misc H
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale
hierarchy_parent_id	828163898
hierarchy_top_title	Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)828163898 (DE-600)2825221-4
title	INCURSIUNI ANALITICE ASUPRA REALIZĂRII ACTELOR DE DISPOZIȚIE ALE DEBITORULUI ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE POTRIVIT DREPTULUI ROMÂNESC ȘI CELUI DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ034936521 (DE-599)DOAJ908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3
title_full	INCURSIUNI ANALITICE ASUPRA REALIZĂRII ACTELOR DE DISPOZIȚIE ALE DEBITORULUI ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE POTRIVIT DREPTULUI ROMÂNESC ȘI CELUI DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA
author_sort	Anatolie BĂNĂRESCU
journal	Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale
journalStr	Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale
lang_code	eng rum rus
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2017
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Anatolie BĂNĂRESCU
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Anatolie BĂNĂRESCU
title_sort	incursiuni analitice asupra realizării actelor de dispoziție ale debitorului în procedura de executare potrivit dreptului românesc și celui din republica moldova
title_auth	INCURSIUNI ANALITICE ASUPRA REALIZĂRII ACTELOR DE DISPOZIȚIE ALE DEBITORULUI ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE POTRIVIT DREPTULUI ROMÂNESC ȘI CELUI DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA
abstract	<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Prezentul studiu constituie o primă încercare de a nuanța, sub aspect comparativ, unele acte de dispoziție ale debitorului realizate în procedura de executare silită a hotărârilor judecătorești în materie civilă care n-au fost cuprinse în câmpul vizual al legiuitorului la reglementarea principiului disponibilității, dar care prin esența lor derivă din varietatea drepturilor puse la îndemâna debitorului la etapa de executare a hotărârilor judecătorești.</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Modul de exercitare a acestor acte a fost analizat prin prisma prevederilor noului Cod de procedură civilă al României </span<<span lang="RO"<și ale Codului de executare al Republicii Moldova. Apreciind finalitățile juridice ale fiecărui act de dispoziție al debitorului în raport cu reglementările de rigoare, au fost identificate unele obscurități legale ce pot crea în practică diferite dificultăți în realizarea corespunzătoare a activităților execuționale, ceea ce în consecință afectează executarea în termen rezonabil a hotărârilor judecătorești.<strong<</strong<</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<strong<<span lang="RO"<ANALITICAL INCURSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEBITOR’S ACTS OF DISPOZITION IN THE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE ACCORDINC TO THE ROMAIAN LAW AND THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA</span<</strong<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<This survey is a first attempt to underline from a comparative point of view some debtor disposal documents, performed into the procedure of forced execution of judicial judgment in civil matter which were ignored by the lawmaker within the regulation of the principle of availability, but which derive from the rights variety the debtor is entitled when enforcing the judicial judgments. </span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<During this subject approach there were identified under the principle of availability the disposal documents of the debtor that can be enforced in the procedure of forced execution, analyzing from a comparative point of view their <span<enforcement, according to provision of the Civil Procedure Code of Romania and the Enforcement Code of the Republicof Moldova. Analyzing the judicial objectives of each disposal document, comparative to regulations in force there were</span< identified some legal obscurities that could cause within practice different difficulties when pursuing the performing activities, and could affect the execution within a reasonable time of judicial judgments. </span<</p<
abstractGer	<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Prezentul studiu constituie o primă încercare de a nuanța, sub aspect comparativ, unele acte de dispoziție ale debitorului realizate în procedura de executare silită a hotărârilor judecătorești în materie civilă care n-au fost cuprinse în câmpul vizual al legiuitorului la reglementarea principiului disponibilității, dar care prin esența lor derivă din varietatea drepturilor puse la îndemâna debitorului la etapa de executare a hotărârilor judecătorești.</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Modul de exercitare a acestor acte a fost analizat prin prisma prevederilor noului Cod de procedură civilă al României </span<<span lang="RO"<și ale Codului de executare al Republicii Moldova. Apreciind finalitățile juridice ale fiecărui act de dispoziție al debitorului în raport cu reglementările de rigoare, au fost identificate unele obscurități legale ce pot crea în practică diferite dificultăți în realizarea corespunzătoare a activităților execuționale, ceea ce în consecință afectează executarea în termen rezonabil a hotărârilor judecătorești.<strong<</strong<</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<strong<<span lang="RO"<ANALITICAL INCURSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEBITOR’S ACTS OF DISPOZITION IN THE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE ACCORDINC TO THE ROMAIAN LAW AND THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA</span<</strong<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<This survey is a first attempt to underline from a comparative point of view some debtor disposal documents, performed into the procedure of forced execution of judicial judgment in civil matter which were ignored by the lawmaker within the regulation of the principle of availability, but which derive from the rights variety the debtor is entitled when enforcing the judicial judgments. </span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<During this subject approach there were identified under the principle of availability the disposal documents of the debtor that can be enforced in the procedure of forced execution, analyzing from a comparative point of view their <span<enforcement, according to provision of the Civil Procedure Code of Romania and the Enforcement Code of the Republicof Moldova. Analyzing the judicial objectives of each disposal document, comparative to regulations in force there were</span< identified some legal obscurities that could cause within practice different difficulties when pursuing the performing activities, and could affect the execution within a reasonable time of judicial judgments. </span<</p<
abstract_unstemmed	<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Prezentul studiu constituie o primă încercare de a nuanța, sub aspect comparativ, unele acte de dispoziție ale debitorului realizate în procedura de executare silită a hotărârilor judecătorești în materie civilă care n-au fost cuprinse în câmpul vizual al legiuitorului la reglementarea principiului disponibilității, dar care prin esența lor derivă din varietatea drepturilor puse la îndemâna debitorului la etapa de executare a hotărârilor judecătorești.</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Modul de exercitare a acestor acte a fost analizat prin prisma prevederilor noului Cod de procedură civilă al României </span<<span lang="RO"<și ale Codului de executare al Republicii Moldova. Apreciind finalitățile juridice ale fiecărui act de dispoziție al debitorului în raport cu reglementările de rigoare, au fost identificate unele obscurități legale ce pot crea în practică diferite dificultăți în realizarea corespunzătoare a activităților execuționale, ceea ce în consecință afectează executarea în termen rezonabil a hotărârilor judecătorești.<strong<</strong<</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<strong<<span lang="RO"<ANALITICAL INCURSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEBITOR’S ACTS OF DISPOZITION IN THE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE ACCORDINC TO THE ROMAIAN LAW AND THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA</span<</strong<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<This survey is a first attempt to underline from a comparative point of view some debtor disposal documents, performed into the procedure of forced execution of judicial judgment in civil matter which were ignored by the lawmaker within the regulation of the principle of availability, but which derive from the rights variety the debtor is entitled when enforcing the judicial judgments. </span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<During this subject approach there were identified under the principle of availability the disposal documents of the debtor that can be enforced in the procedure of forced execution, analyzing from a comparative point of view their <span<enforcement, according to provision of the Civil Procedure Code of Romania and the Enforcement Code of the Republicof Moldova. Analyzing the judicial objectives of each disposal document, comparative to regulations in force there were</span< identified some legal obscurities that could cause within practice different difficulties when pursuing the performing activities, and could affect the execution within a reasonable time of judicial judgments. </span<</p<
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	3 (103)
title_short	INCURSIUNI ANALITICE ASUPRA REALIZĂRII ACTELOR DE DISPOZIȚIE ALE DEBITORULUI ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE POTRIVIT DREPTULUI ROMÂNESC ȘI CELUI DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA
url	https://doaj.org/article/908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3 http://ojs.studiamsu.eu/index.php/social/article/view/780 https://doaj.org/toc/1814-3199 https://doaj.org/toc/2345-1017
remote_bool	true
ppnlink	828163898
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
up_date	2024-07-04T01:10:31.178Z
_version_	1803608843804999680
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ034936521</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502143259.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ034936521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rum</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anatolie BĂNĂRESCU</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">INCURSIUNI ANALITICE ASUPRA REALIZĂRII ACTELOR DE DISPOZIȚIE ALE DEBITORULUI ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE POTRIVIT DREPTULUI ROMÂNESC ȘI CELUI DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"><p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Prezentul studiu constituie o primă încercare de a nuanța, sub aspect comparativ, unele acte de dispoziție ale debitorului realizate în procedura de executare silită a hotărârilor judecătorești în materie civilă care n-au fost cuprinse în câmpul vizual al legiuitorului la reglementarea principiului disponibilității, dar care prin esența lor derivă din varietatea drepturilor puse la îndemâna debitorului la etapa de executare a hotărârilor judecătorești.</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="RO"<Modul de exercitare a acestor acte a fost analizat prin prisma prevederilor noului Cod de procedură civilă al României </span<<span lang="RO"<și ale Codului de executare al Republicii Moldova. Apreciind finalitățile juridice ale fiecărui act de dispoziție al debitorului în raport cu reglementările de rigoare, au fost identificate unele obscurități legale ce pot crea în practică diferite dificultăți în realizarea corespunzătoare a activităților execuționale, ceea ce în consecință afectează executarea în termen rezonabil a hotărârilor judecătorești.<strong<</strong<</span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<strong<<span lang="RO"<ANALITICAL INCURSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEBITOR’S ACTS OF DISPOZITION IN THE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE ACCORDINC TO THE ROMAIAN LAW AND THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA</span<</strong<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<This survey is a first attempt to underline from a comparative point of view some debtor disposal documents, performed into the procedure of forced execution of judicial judgment in civil matter which were ignored by the lawmaker within the regulation of the principle of availability, but which derive from the rights variety the debtor is entitled when enforcing the judicial judgments. </span<</p<<p class="NoSpacing"<<span lang="EN-US"<During this subject approach there were identified under the principle of availability the disposal documents of the debtor that can be enforced in the procedure of forced execution, analyzing from a comparative point of view their <span<enforcement, according to provision of the Civil Procedure Code of Romania and the Enforcement Code of the Republicof Moldova. Analyzing the judicial objectives of each disposal document, comparative to regulations in force there were</span< identified some legal obscurities that could cause within practice different difficulties when pursuing the performing activities, and could affect the execution within a reasonable time of judicial judgments. </span<</p<</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">law, creditor, debtor, enforceable document, forced execution, voluntary execution, principle of availability, judicial judgment, incidents during forced execution, instituting the procedure of forced execution, the deferral of procedure of forced execut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social Sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">H</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale</subfield><subfield code="d">Moldova State University, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">(2017), 3 (103)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)828163898</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2825221-4</subfield><subfield code="x">23451017</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3 (103)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/908a9d5f3c8f4a10a5b71ebcff1ca6e3</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://ojs.studiamsu.eu/index.php/social/article/view/780</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1814-3199</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2345-1017</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">3 (103)</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3985004

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

INCURSIUNI ANALITICE ASUPRA REALIZĂRII ACTELOR DE DISPOZIȚIE ALE DEBITORULUI ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE POTRIVIT DREPTULUI ROMÂNESC ȘI CELUI DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?