Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga
Introduction. Performance evaluation is the process of evaluating the implementation of the tasks of organizational members, including libraries, in accordance with the performance standards using particular way including instruments. Instruments are needed to document the evaluation carried out by...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Anton Hermawan [verfasserIn] Anggita Kristiasari [verfasserIn] Fransiska N. Bhiju [verfasserIn] Dona Manik [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Indonesisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi - Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2017, 16(2020), 1 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:16 ; year:2020 ; number:1 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.22146/bip.v16i1.61 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ034949704 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ034949704 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230307193249.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.22146/bip.v16i1.61 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ034949704 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a ind | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Anton Hermawan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Introduction. Performance evaluation is the process of evaluating the implementation of the tasks of organizational members, including libraries, in accordance with the performance standards using particular way including instruments. Instruments are needed to document the evaluation carried out by the organization. Therefore, libraries need to pay attention to developa performance evaluation instrument to plan their human resources. This research explains an overview of stages in developing performance evaluation instruments in an organization, particularly libraries. Research methods. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach by involving the existing performance evaluation dimensions. After that, the performance evaluation indicators were developed. Data analysis. The measurement of validity and reliability was valid when the correlation between items was <0.3 and when Cronbach alpha was < 0.6. The measurement of validity and reliability help to support the development of performance evaluation instruments. Results and Discussion. Of the 36 statements, only 27 items were valid and used in performance appraisal instruments. The items are arranged in a model of development of the performance evaluation instruments. Conclusion and recommendations. A good organization needs to pay attention to the right indicators in an assessment instrument. In its application, it is effective to use the 360 degree method, where employees are evaluated by other staff to ensure the balance professional perspective. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a instrument development | |
| 650 | 4 | |a performance evaluation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a performance evaluation instruments | |
| 650 | 4 | |a librarian performance | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Bibliography. Library science. Information resources | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Z | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Anggita Kristiasari |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Fransiska N. Bhiju |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Dona Manik |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi |d Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2017 |g 16(2020), 1 |w (DE-627)176063347X |x 24770361 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v16i1.61 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/BIP/article/view/61 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1693-7740 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2477-0361 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 16 |j 2020 |e 1 | ||
| author_variant |
a h ah a k ak f n b fnb d m dm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:24770361:2020----::egmagnntueeausknraaaepsaannvriaki |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.22146/bip.v16i1.61 doi (DE-627)DOAJ034949704 (DE-599)DOAJ101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ind Anton Hermawan verfasserin aut Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction. Performance evaluation is the process of evaluating the implementation of the tasks of organizational members, including libraries, in accordance with the performance standards using particular way including instruments. Instruments are needed to document the evaluation carried out by the organization. Therefore, libraries need to pay attention to developa performance evaluation instrument to plan their human resources. This research explains an overview of stages in developing performance evaluation instruments in an organization, particularly libraries. Research methods. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach by involving the existing performance evaluation dimensions. After that, the performance evaluation indicators were developed. Data analysis. The measurement of validity and reliability was valid when the correlation between items was <0.3 and when Cronbach alpha was < 0.6. The measurement of validity and reliability help to support the development of performance evaluation instruments. Results and Discussion. Of the 36 statements, only 27 items were valid and used in performance appraisal instruments. The items are arranged in a model of development of the performance evaluation instruments. Conclusion and recommendations. A good organization needs to pay attention to the right indicators in an assessment instrument. In its application, it is effective to use the 360 degree method, where employees are evaluated by other staff to ensure the balance professional perspective. instrument development performance evaluation performance evaluation instruments librarian performance Bibliography. Library science. Information resources Z Anggita Kristiasari verfasserin aut Fransiska N. Bhiju verfasserin aut Dona Manik verfasserin aut In Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2017 16(2020), 1 (DE-627)176063347X 24770361 nnns volume:16 year:2020 number:1 https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v16i1.61 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d kostenfrei https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/BIP/article/view/61 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1693-7740 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2477-0361 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 16 2020 1 |
| spelling |
10.22146/bip.v16i1.61 doi (DE-627)DOAJ034949704 (DE-599)DOAJ101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ind Anton Hermawan verfasserin aut Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction. Performance evaluation is the process of evaluating the implementation of the tasks of organizational members, including libraries, in accordance with the performance standards using particular way including instruments. Instruments are needed to document the evaluation carried out by the organization. Therefore, libraries need to pay attention to developa performance evaluation instrument to plan their human resources. This research explains an overview of stages in developing performance evaluation instruments in an organization, particularly libraries. Research methods. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach by involving the existing performance evaluation dimensions. After that, the performance evaluation indicators were developed. Data analysis. The measurement of validity and reliability was valid when the correlation between items was <0.3 and when Cronbach alpha was < 0.6. The measurement of validity and reliability help to support the development of performance evaluation instruments. Results and Discussion. Of the 36 statements, only 27 items were valid and used in performance appraisal instruments. The items are arranged in a model of development of the performance evaluation instruments. Conclusion and recommendations. A good organization needs to pay attention to the right indicators in an assessment instrument. In its application, it is effective to use the 360 degree method, where employees are evaluated by other staff to ensure the balance professional perspective. instrument development performance evaluation performance evaluation instruments librarian performance Bibliography. Library science. Information resources Z Anggita Kristiasari verfasserin aut Fransiska N. Bhiju verfasserin aut Dona Manik verfasserin aut In Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2017 16(2020), 1 (DE-627)176063347X 24770361 nnns volume:16 year:2020 number:1 https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v16i1.61 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d kostenfrei https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/BIP/article/view/61 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1693-7740 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2477-0361 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 16 2020 1 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.22146/bip.v16i1.61 doi (DE-627)DOAJ034949704 (DE-599)DOAJ101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ind Anton Hermawan verfasserin aut Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction. Performance evaluation is the process of evaluating the implementation of the tasks of organizational members, including libraries, in accordance with the performance standards using particular way including instruments. Instruments are needed to document the evaluation carried out by the organization. Therefore, libraries need to pay attention to developa performance evaluation instrument to plan their human resources. This research explains an overview of stages in developing performance evaluation instruments in an organization, particularly libraries. Research methods. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach by involving the existing performance evaluation dimensions. After that, the performance evaluation indicators were developed. Data analysis. The measurement of validity and reliability was valid when the correlation between items was <0.3 and when Cronbach alpha was < 0.6. The measurement of validity and reliability help to support the development of performance evaluation instruments. Results and Discussion. Of the 36 statements, only 27 items were valid and used in performance appraisal instruments. The items are arranged in a model of development of the performance evaluation instruments. Conclusion and recommendations. A good organization needs to pay attention to the right indicators in an assessment instrument. In its application, it is effective to use the 360 degree method, where employees are evaluated by other staff to ensure the balance professional perspective. instrument development performance evaluation performance evaluation instruments librarian performance Bibliography. Library science. Information resources Z Anggita Kristiasari verfasserin aut Fransiska N. Bhiju verfasserin aut Dona Manik verfasserin aut In Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2017 16(2020), 1 (DE-627)176063347X 24770361 nnns volume:16 year:2020 number:1 https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v16i1.61 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d kostenfrei https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/BIP/article/view/61 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1693-7740 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2477-0361 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 16 2020 1 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.22146/bip.v16i1.61 doi (DE-627)DOAJ034949704 (DE-599)DOAJ101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ind Anton Hermawan verfasserin aut Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction. Performance evaluation is the process of evaluating the implementation of the tasks of organizational members, including libraries, in accordance with the performance standards using particular way including instruments. Instruments are needed to document the evaluation carried out by the organization. Therefore, libraries need to pay attention to developa performance evaluation instrument to plan their human resources. This research explains an overview of stages in developing performance evaluation instruments in an organization, particularly libraries. Research methods. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach by involving the existing performance evaluation dimensions. After that, the performance evaluation indicators were developed. Data analysis. The measurement of validity and reliability was valid when the correlation between items was <0.3 and when Cronbach alpha was < 0.6. The measurement of validity and reliability help to support the development of performance evaluation instruments. Results and Discussion. Of the 36 statements, only 27 items were valid and used in performance appraisal instruments. The items are arranged in a model of development of the performance evaluation instruments. Conclusion and recommendations. A good organization needs to pay attention to the right indicators in an assessment instrument. In its application, it is effective to use the 360 degree method, where employees are evaluated by other staff to ensure the balance professional perspective. instrument development performance evaluation performance evaluation instruments librarian performance Bibliography. Library science. Information resources Z Anggita Kristiasari verfasserin aut Fransiska N. Bhiju verfasserin aut Dona Manik verfasserin aut In Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2017 16(2020), 1 (DE-627)176063347X 24770361 nnns volume:16 year:2020 number:1 https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v16i1.61 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d kostenfrei https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/BIP/article/view/61 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1693-7740 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2477-0361 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 16 2020 1 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.22146/bip.v16i1.61 doi (DE-627)DOAJ034949704 (DE-599)DOAJ101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ind Anton Hermawan verfasserin aut Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction. Performance evaluation is the process of evaluating the implementation of the tasks of organizational members, including libraries, in accordance with the performance standards using particular way including instruments. Instruments are needed to document the evaluation carried out by the organization. Therefore, libraries need to pay attention to developa performance evaluation instrument to plan their human resources. This research explains an overview of stages in developing performance evaluation instruments in an organization, particularly libraries. Research methods. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach by involving the existing performance evaluation dimensions. After that, the performance evaluation indicators were developed. Data analysis. The measurement of validity and reliability was valid when the correlation between items was <0.3 and when Cronbach alpha was < 0.6. The measurement of validity and reliability help to support the development of performance evaluation instruments. Results and Discussion. Of the 36 statements, only 27 items were valid and used in performance appraisal instruments. The items are arranged in a model of development of the performance evaluation instruments. Conclusion and recommendations. A good organization needs to pay attention to the right indicators in an assessment instrument. In its application, it is effective to use the 360 degree method, where employees are evaluated by other staff to ensure the balance professional perspective. instrument development performance evaluation performance evaluation instruments librarian performance Bibliography. Library science. Information resources Z Anggita Kristiasari verfasserin aut Fransiska N. Bhiju verfasserin aut Dona Manik verfasserin aut In Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2017 16(2020), 1 (DE-627)176063347X 24770361 nnns volume:16 year:2020 number:1 https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v16i1.61 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d kostenfrei https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/BIP/article/view/61 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1693-7740 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2477-0361 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 16 2020 1 |
| language |
English Indonesian |
| source |
In Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi 16(2020), 1 volume:16 year:2020 number:1 |
| sourceStr |
In Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi 16(2020), 1 volume:16 year:2020 number:1 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
instrument development performance evaluation performance evaluation instruments librarian performance Bibliography. Library science. Information resources Z |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Anton Hermawan @@aut@@ Anggita Kristiasari @@aut@@ Fransiska N. Bhiju @@aut@@ Dona Manik @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
176063347X |
| id |
DOAJ034949704 |
| language_de |
englisch Sangiang |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ034949704</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307193249.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22146/bip.v16i1.61</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ034949704</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">ind</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anton Hermawan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction. Performance evaluation is the process of evaluating the implementation of the tasks of organizational members, including libraries, in accordance with the performance standards using particular way including instruments. Instruments are needed to document the evaluation carried out by the organization. Therefore, libraries need to pay attention to developa performance evaluation instrument to plan their human resources. This research explains an overview of stages in developing performance evaluation instruments in an organization, particularly libraries. Research methods. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach by involving the existing performance evaluation dimensions. After that, the performance evaluation indicators were developed. Data analysis. The measurement of validity and reliability was valid when the correlation between items was <0.3 and when Cronbach alpha was < 0.6. The measurement of validity and reliability help to support the development of performance evaluation instruments. Results and Discussion. Of the 36 statements, only 27 items were valid and used in performance appraisal instruments. The items are arranged in a model of development of the performance evaluation instruments. Conclusion and recommendations. A good organization needs to pay attention to the right indicators in an assessment instrument. In its application, it is effective to use the 360 degree method, where employees are evaluated by other staff to ensure the balance professional perspective.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">instrument development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">performance evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">performance evaluation instruments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">librarian performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Bibliography. Library science. Information resources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anggita Kristiasari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fransiska N. Bhiju</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dona Manik</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi</subfield><subfield code="d">Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2020), 1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)176063347X</subfield><subfield code="x">24770361</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v16i1.61</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/BIP/article/view/61</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1693-7740</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2477-0361</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Anton Hermawan |
| spellingShingle |
Anton Hermawan misc instrument development misc performance evaluation misc performance evaluation instruments misc librarian performance misc Bibliography. Library science. Information resources misc Z Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga |
| authorStr |
Anton Hermawan |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)176063347X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
24770361 |
| topic_title |
Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga instrument development performance evaluation performance evaluation instruments librarian performance |
| topic |
misc instrument development misc performance evaluation misc performance evaluation instruments misc librarian performance misc Bibliography. Library science. Information resources misc Z |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc instrument development misc performance evaluation misc performance evaluation instruments misc librarian performance misc Bibliography. Library science. Information resources misc Z |
| topic_browse |
misc instrument development misc performance evaluation misc performance evaluation instruments misc librarian performance misc Bibliography. Library science. Information resources misc Z |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
176063347X |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)176063347X |
| title |
Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ034949704 (DE-599)DOAJ101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d |
| title_full |
Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga |
| author_sort |
Anton Hermawan |
| journal |
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi |
| journalStr |
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi |
| lang_code |
eng ind |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Anton Hermawan Anggita Kristiasari Fransiska N. Bhiju Dona Manik |
| container_volume |
16 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Anton Hermawan |
| doi_str_mv |
10.22146/bip.v16i1.61 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada perpustakaan universitas kristen satya wacana salatiga |
| title_auth |
Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga |
| abstract |
Introduction. Performance evaluation is the process of evaluating the implementation of the tasks of organizational members, including libraries, in accordance with the performance standards using particular way including instruments. Instruments are needed to document the evaluation carried out by the organization. Therefore, libraries need to pay attention to developa performance evaluation instrument to plan their human resources. This research explains an overview of stages in developing performance evaluation instruments in an organization, particularly libraries. Research methods. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach by involving the existing performance evaluation dimensions. After that, the performance evaluation indicators were developed. Data analysis. The measurement of validity and reliability was valid when the correlation between items was <0.3 and when Cronbach alpha was < 0.6. The measurement of validity and reliability help to support the development of performance evaluation instruments. Results and Discussion. Of the 36 statements, only 27 items were valid and used in performance appraisal instruments. The items are arranged in a model of development of the performance evaluation instruments. Conclusion and recommendations. A good organization needs to pay attention to the right indicators in an assessment instrument. In its application, it is effective to use the 360 degree method, where employees are evaluated by other staff to ensure the balance professional perspective. |
| abstractGer |
Introduction. Performance evaluation is the process of evaluating the implementation of the tasks of organizational members, including libraries, in accordance with the performance standards using particular way including instruments. Instruments are needed to document the evaluation carried out by the organization. Therefore, libraries need to pay attention to developa performance evaluation instrument to plan their human resources. This research explains an overview of stages in developing performance evaluation instruments in an organization, particularly libraries. Research methods. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach by involving the existing performance evaluation dimensions. After that, the performance evaluation indicators were developed. Data analysis. The measurement of validity and reliability was valid when the correlation between items was <0.3 and when Cronbach alpha was < 0.6. The measurement of validity and reliability help to support the development of performance evaluation instruments. Results and Discussion. Of the 36 statements, only 27 items were valid and used in performance appraisal instruments. The items are arranged in a model of development of the performance evaluation instruments. Conclusion and recommendations. A good organization needs to pay attention to the right indicators in an assessment instrument. In its application, it is effective to use the 360 degree method, where employees are evaluated by other staff to ensure the balance professional perspective. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Introduction. Performance evaluation is the process of evaluating the implementation of the tasks of organizational members, including libraries, in accordance with the performance standards using particular way including instruments. Instruments are needed to document the evaluation carried out by the organization. Therefore, libraries need to pay attention to developa performance evaluation instrument to plan their human resources. This research explains an overview of stages in developing performance evaluation instruments in an organization, particularly libraries. Research methods. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach by involving the existing performance evaluation dimensions. After that, the performance evaluation indicators were developed. Data analysis. The measurement of validity and reliability was valid when the correlation between items was <0.3 and when Cronbach alpha was < 0.6. The measurement of validity and reliability help to support the development of performance evaluation instruments. Results and Discussion. Of the 36 statements, only 27 items were valid and used in performance appraisal instruments. The items are arranged in a model of development of the performance evaluation instruments. Conclusion and recommendations. A good organization needs to pay attention to the right indicators in an assessment instrument. In its application, it is effective to use the 360 degree method, where employees are evaluated by other staff to ensure the balance professional perspective. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v16i1.61 https://doaj.org/article/101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/BIP/article/view/61 https://doaj.org/toc/1693-7740 https://doaj.org/toc/2477-0361 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Anggita Kristiasari Fransiska N. Bhiju Dona Manik |
| author2Str |
Anggita Kristiasari Fransiska N. Bhiju Dona Manik |
| ppnlink |
176063347X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.22146/bip.v16i1.61 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T01:13:31.700Z |
| _version_ |
1803609033102327808 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ034949704</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307193249.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22146/bip.v16i1.61</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ034949704</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">ind</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anton Hermawan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction. Performance evaluation is the process of evaluating the implementation of the tasks of organizational members, including libraries, in accordance with the performance standards using particular way including instruments. Instruments are needed to document the evaluation carried out by the organization. Therefore, libraries need to pay attention to developa performance evaluation instrument to plan their human resources. This research explains an overview of stages in developing performance evaluation instruments in an organization, particularly libraries. Research methods. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach by involving the existing performance evaluation dimensions. After that, the performance evaluation indicators were developed. Data analysis. The measurement of validity and reliability was valid when the correlation between items was <0.3 and when Cronbach alpha was < 0.6. The measurement of validity and reliability help to support the development of performance evaluation instruments. Results and Discussion. Of the 36 statements, only 27 items were valid and used in performance appraisal instruments. The items are arranged in a model of development of the performance evaluation instruments. Conclusion and recommendations. A good organization needs to pay attention to the right indicators in an assessment instrument. In its application, it is effective to use the 360 degree method, where employees are evaluated by other staff to ensure the balance professional perspective.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">instrument development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">performance evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">performance evaluation instruments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">librarian performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Bibliography. Library science. Information resources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anggita Kristiasari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fransiska N. Bhiju</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dona Manik</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi</subfield><subfield code="d">Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2020), 1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)176063347X</subfield><subfield code="x">24770361</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v16i1.61</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/101639d251e24798943cf6bcd94c1c6d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/BIP/article/view/61</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1693-7740</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2477-0361</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3996143 |