NSGA-II-Based Multi-objective Mission Planning Method for Satellite Formation System
This study proposes a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II-based multi-objective optimization method to solve the multi-objective mission planning problem for satellite formation flying system which has the ability to obtain both digital elevation map and ground moving target indicator informa...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Xiaowei Shao [verfasserIn] Zehao Zhang [verfasserIn] Jihe Wang [verfasserIn] Dexin Zhang [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2016 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management - Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (IAE), 2010, 8(2016), 4 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:8 ; year:2016 ; number:4 |
Links: |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ036031364 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ036031364 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230501184441.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230227s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ036031364 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJf330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a TL1-4050 | |
100 | 0 | |a Xiaowei Shao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a NSGA-II-Based Multi-objective Mission Planning Method for Satellite Formation System |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This study proposes a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II-based multi-objective optimization method to solve the multi-objective mission planning problem for satellite formation flying system which has the ability to obtain both digital elevation map and ground moving target indicator information at the same time when certain conditions are satisfied. The 2 objectives considered in this study are maximizing total profits and maximizing numbers of completed acquisitions. Thus, the multiple-objective satellite scheduling optimization problem is formulated and solved by the proposed method. Its validity and effectiveness are verified by numerical simulations, and the results show that it can achieve better performance with respect to 2 different objectives in an overall perspective than the traditional scheduling optimization, which can consider only 1 objective | ||
650 | 4 | |a NSGA-II method | |
650 | 4 | |a Multi-objective mission planning | |
650 | 4 | |a DEM and GMTI | |
650 | 4 | |a Formation flying system. | |
653 | 0 | |a Technology | |
653 | 0 | |a T | |
653 | 0 | |a Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics | |
700 | 0 | |a Zehao Zhang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Jihe Wang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Dexin Zhang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management |d Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (IAE), 2010 |g 8(2016), 4 |w (DE-627)633082236 |w (DE-600)2567333-6 |x 21759146 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/f330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.jatm.com.br/jatm/article/view/700 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2175-9146 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 8 |j 2016 |e 4 |
author_variant |
x s xs z z zz j w jw d z dz |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:21759146:2016----::saiaemlibetvmsinlnigehdostl |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
callnumber-subject-code |
TL |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ036031364 (DE-599)DOAJf330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TL1-4050 Xiaowei Shao verfasserin aut NSGA-II-Based Multi-objective Mission Planning Method for Satellite Formation System 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study proposes a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II-based multi-objective optimization method to solve the multi-objective mission planning problem for satellite formation flying system which has the ability to obtain both digital elevation map and ground moving target indicator information at the same time when certain conditions are satisfied. The 2 objectives considered in this study are maximizing total profits and maximizing numbers of completed acquisitions. Thus, the multiple-objective satellite scheduling optimization problem is formulated and solved by the proposed method. Its validity and effectiveness are verified by numerical simulations, and the results show that it can achieve better performance with respect to 2 different objectives in an overall perspective than the traditional scheduling optimization, which can consider only 1 objective NSGA-II method Multi-objective mission planning DEM and GMTI Formation flying system. Technology T Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics Zehao Zhang verfasserin aut Jihe Wang verfasserin aut Dexin Zhang verfasserin aut In Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (IAE), 2010 8(2016), 4 (DE-627)633082236 (DE-600)2567333-6 21759146 nnns volume:8 year:2016 number:4 https://doaj.org/article/f330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3 kostenfrei https://www.jatm.com.br/jatm/article/view/700 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2175-9146 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2016 4 |
spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ036031364 (DE-599)DOAJf330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TL1-4050 Xiaowei Shao verfasserin aut NSGA-II-Based Multi-objective Mission Planning Method for Satellite Formation System 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study proposes a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II-based multi-objective optimization method to solve the multi-objective mission planning problem for satellite formation flying system which has the ability to obtain both digital elevation map and ground moving target indicator information at the same time when certain conditions are satisfied. The 2 objectives considered in this study are maximizing total profits and maximizing numbers of completed acquisitions. Thus, the multiple-objective satellite scheduling optimization problem is formulated and solved by the proposed method. Its validity and effectiveness are verified by numerical simulations, and the results show that it can achieve better performance with respect to 2 different objectives in an overall perspective than the traditional scheduling optimization, which can consider only 1 objective NSGA-II method Multi-objective mission planning DEM and GMTI Formation flying system. Technology T Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics Zehao Zhang verfasserin aut Jihe Wang verfasserin aut Dexin Zhang verfasserin aut In Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (IAE), 2010 8(2016), 4 (DE-627)633082236 (DE-600)2567333-6 21759146 nnns volume:8 year:2016 number:4 https://doaj.org/article/f330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3 kostenfrei https://www.jatm.com.br/jatm/article/view/700 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2175-9146 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2016 4 |
allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ036031364 (DE-599)DOAJf330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TL1-4050 Xiaowei Shao verfasserin aut NSGA-II-Based Multi-objective Mission Planning Method for Satellite Formation System 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study proposes a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II-based multi-objective optimization method to solve the multi-objective mission planning problem for satellite formation flying system which has the ability to obtain both digital elevation map and ground moving target indicator information at the same time when certain conditions are satisfied. The 2 objectives considered in this study are maximizing total profits and maximizing numbers of completed acquisitions. Thus, the multiple-objective satellite scheduling optimization problem is formulated and solved by the proposed method. Its validity and effectiveness are verified by numerical simulations, and the results show that it can achieve better performance with respect to 2 different objectives in an overall perspective than the traditional scheduling optimization, which can consider only 1 objective NSGA-II method Multi-objective mission planning DEM and GMTI Formation flying system. Technology T Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics Zehao Zhang verfasserin aut Jihe Wang verfasserin aut Dexin Zhang verfasserin aut In Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (IAE), 2010 8(2016), 4 (DE-627)633082236 (DE-600)2567333-6 21759146 nnns volume:8 year:2016 number:4 https://doaj.org/article/f330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3 kostenfrei https://www.jatm.com.br/jatm/article/view/700 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2175-9146 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2016 4 |
allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ036031364 (DE-599)DOAJf330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TL1-4050 Xiaowei Shao verfasserin aut NSGA-II-Based Multi-objective Mission Planning Method for Satellite Formation System 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study proposes a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II-based multi-objective optimization method to solve the multi-objective mission planning problem for satellite formation flying system which has the ability to obtain both digital elevation map and ground moving target indicator information at the same time when certain conditions are satisfied. The 2 objectives considered in this study are maximizing total profits and maximizing numbers of completed acquisitions. Thus, the multiple-objective satellite scheduling optimization problem is formulated and solved by the proposed method. Its validity and effectiveness are verified by numerical simulations, and the results show that it can achieve better performance with respect to 2 different objectives in an overall perspective than the traditional scheduling optimization, which can consider only 1 objective NSGA-II method Multi-objective mission planning DEM and GMTI Formation flying system. Technology T Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics Zehao Zhang verfasserin aut Jihe Wang verfasserin aut Dexin Zhang verfasserin aut In Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (IAE), 2010 8(2016), 4 (DE-627)633082236 (DE-600)2567333-6 21759146 nnns volume:8 year:2016 number:4 https://doaj.org/article/f330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3 kostenfrei https://www.jatm.com.br/jatm/article/view/700 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2175-9146 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2016 4 |
allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ036031364 (DE-599)DOAJf330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TL1-4050 Xiaowei Shao verfasserin aut NSGA-II-Based Multi-objective Mission Planning Method for Satellite Formation System 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study proposes a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II-based multi-objective optimization method to solve the multi-objective mission planning problem for satellite formation flying system which has the ability to obtain both digital elevation map and ground moving target indicator information at the same time when certain conditions are satisfied. The 2 objectives considered in this study are maximizing total profits and maximizing numbers of completed acquisitions. Thus, the multiple-objective satellite scheduling optimization problem is formulated and solved by the proposed method. Its validity and effectiveness are verified by numerical simulations, and the results show that it can achieve better performance with respect to 2 different objectives in an overall perspective than the traditional scheduling optimization, which can consider only 1 objective NSGA-II method Multi-objective mission planning DEM and GMTI Formation flying system. Technology T Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics Zehao Zhang verfasserin aut Jihe Wang verfasserin aut Dexin Zhang verfasserin aut In Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (IAE), 2010 8(2016), 4 (DE-627)633082236 (DE-600)2567333-6 21759146 nnns volume:8 year:2016 number:4 https://doaj.org/article/f330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3 kostenfrei https://www.jatm.com.br/jatm/article/view/700 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2175-9146 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2016 4 |
language |
English |
source |
In Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management 8(2016), 4 volume:8 year:2016 number:4 |
sourceStr |
In Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management 8(2016), 4 volume:8 year:2016 number:4 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
NSGA-II method Multi-objective mission planning DEM and GMTI Formation flying system. Technology T Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Xiaowei Shao @@aut@@ Zehao Zhang @@aut@@ Jihe Wang @@aut@@ Dexin Zhang @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
633082236 |
id |
DOAJ036031364 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ036031364</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230501184441.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ036031364</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJf330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TL1-4050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiaowei Shao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">NSGA-II-Based Multi-objective Mission Planning Method for Satellite Formation System</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study proposes a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II-based multi-objective optimization method to solve the multi-objective mission planning problem for satellite formation flying system which has the ability to obtain both digital elevation map and ground moving target indicator information at the same time when certain conditions are satisfied. The 2 objectives considered in this study are maximizing total profits and maximizing numbers of completed acquisitions. Thus, the multiple-objective satellite scheduling optimization problem is formulated and solved by the proposed method. Its validity and effectiveness are verified by numerical simulations, and the results show that it can achieve better performance with respect to 2 different objectives in an overall perspective than the traditional scheduling optimization, which can consider only 1 objective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">NSGA-II method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multi-objective mission planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">DEM and GMTI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Formation flying system.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zehao Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jihe Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dexin Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management</subfield><subfield code="d">Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (IAE), 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2016), 4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)633082236</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2567333-6</subfield><subfield code="x">21759146</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/f330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.jatm.com.br/jatm/article/view/700</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2175-9146</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
author |
Xiaowei Shao |
spellingShingle |
Xiaowei Shao misc TL1-4050 misc NSGA-II method misc Multi-objective mission planning misc DEM and GMTI misc Formation flying system. misc Technology misc T misc Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics NSGA-II-Based Multi-objective Mission Planning Method for Satellite Formation System |
authorStr |
Xiaowei Shao |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)633082236 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
TL1-4050 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
21759146 |
topic_title |
TL1-4050 NSGA-II-Based Multi-objective Mission Planning Method for Satellite Formation System NSGA-II method Multi-objective mission planning DEM and GMTI Formation flying system |
topic |
misc TL1-4050 misc NSGA-II method misc Multi-objective mission planning misc DEM and GMTI misc Formation flying system. misc Technology misc T misc Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics |
topic_unstemmed |
misc TL1-4050 misc NSGA-II method misc Multi-objective mission planning misc DEM and GMTI misc Formation flying system. misc Technology misc T misc Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics |
topic_browse |
misc TL1-4050 misc NSGA-II method misc Multi-objective mission planning misc DEM and GMTI misc Formation flying system. misc Technology misc T misc Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management |
hierarchy_parent_id |
633082236 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)633082236 (DE-600)2567333-6 |
title |
NSGA-II-Based Multi-objective Mission Planning Method for Satellite Formation System |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ036031364 (DE-599)DOAJf330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3 |
title_full |
NSGA-II-Based Multi-objective Mission Planning Method for Satellite Formation System |
author_sort |
Xiaowei Shao |
journal |
Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management |
journalStr |
Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management |
callnumber-first-code |
T |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Xiaowei Shao Zehao Zhang Jihe Wang Dexin Zhang |
container_volume |
8 |
class |
TL1-4050 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Xiaowei Shao |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
nsga-ii-based multi-objective mission planning method for satellite formation system |
callnumber |
TL1-4050 |
title_auth |
NSGA-II-Based Multi-objective Mission Planning Method for Satellite Formation System |
abstract |
This study proposes a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II-based multi-objective optimization method to solve the multi-objective mission planning problem for satellite formation flying system which has the ability to obtain both digital elevation map and ground moving target indicator information at the same time when certain conditions are satisfied. The 2 objectives considered in this study are maximizing total profits and maximizing numbers of completed acquisitions. Thus, the multiple-objective satellite scheduling optimization problem is formulated and solved by the proposed method. Its validity and effectiveness are verified by numerical simulations, and the results show that it can achieve better performance with respect to 2 different objectives in an overall perspective than the traditional scheduling optimization, which can consider only 1 objective |
abstractGer |
This study proposes a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II-based multi-objective optimization method to solve the multi-objective mission planning problem for satellite formation flying system which has the ability to obtain both digital elevation map and ground moving target indicator information at the same time when certain conditions are satisfied. The 2 objectives considered in this study are maximizing total profits and maximizing numbers of completed acquisitions. Thus, the multiple-objective satellite scheduling optimization problem is formulated and solved by the proposed method. Its validity and effectiveness are verified by numerical simulations, and the results show that it can achieve better performance with respect to 2 different objectives in an overall perspective than the traditional scheduling optimization, which can consider only 1 objective |
abstract_unstemmed |
This study proposes a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II-based multi-objective optimization method to solve the multi-objective mission planning problem for satellite formation flying system which has the ability to obtain both digital elevation map and ground moving target indicator information at the same time when certain conditions are satisfied. The 2 objectives considered in this study are maximizing total profits and maximizing numbers of completed acquisitions. Thus, the multiple-objective satellite scheduling optimization problem is formulated and solved by the proposed method. Its validity and effectiveness are verified by numerical simulations, and the results show that it can achieve better performance with respect to 2 different objectives in an overall perspective than the traditional scheduling optimization, which can consider only 1 objective |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
4 |
title_short |
NSGA-II-Based Multi-objective Mission Planning Method for Satellite Formation System |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/f330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3 https://www.jatm.com.br/jatm/article/view/700 https://doaj.org/toc/2175-9146 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Zehao Zhang Jihe Wang Dexin Zhang |
author2Str |
Zehao Zhang Jihe Wang Dexin Zhang |
ppnlink |
633082236 |
callnumber-subject |
TL - Motor Vehicles and Aeronautics |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
callnumber-a |
TL1-4050 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T18:19:06.886Z |
_version_ |
1803582960454074369 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ036031364</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230501184441.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ036031364</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJf330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TL1-4050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiaowei Shao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">NSGA-II-Based Multi-objective Mission Planning Method for Satellite Formation System</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study proposes a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II-based multi-objective optimization method to solve the multi-objective mission planning problem for satellite formation flying system which has the ability to obtain both digital elevation map and ground moving target indicator information at the same time when certain conditions are satisfied. The 2 objectives considered in this study are maximizing total profits and maximizing numbers of completed acquisitions. Thus, the multiple-objective satellite scheduling optimization problem is formulated and solved by the proposed method. Its validity and effectiveness are verified by numerical simulations, and the results show that it can achieve better performance with respect to 2 different objectives in an overall perspective than the traditional scheduling optimization, which can consider only 1 objective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">NSGA-II method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multi-objective mission planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">DEM and GMTI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Formation flying system.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zehao Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jihe Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dexin Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management</subfield><subfield code="d">Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (IAE), 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2016), 4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)633082236</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2567333-6</subfield><subfield code="x">21759146</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/f330e9a3aef34a3a995724e8f855efe3</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.jatm.com.br/jatm/article/view/700</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2175-9146</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401107 |