Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication
In this paper, I expand upon the research on authority delegation begun by Overgaard and myself in our 2016 paper Authority Delegation. I argue that singular authority delegation – in which a community delegates authority over a given topic to a single expert community – should be distinguished from...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Mirka Loiselle [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Scientonomy - Scientonomy Community, 2019, 1(2017) |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:1 ; year:2017 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.33137/js.v1i0.28233 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ036639958 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ036639958 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230307232408.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.33137/js.v1i0.28233 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ036639958 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJd0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Mirka Loiselle |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this paper, I expand upon the research on authority delegation begun by Overgaard and myself in our 2016 paper Authority Delegation. I argue that singular authority delegation – in which a community delegates authority over a given topic to a single expert community – should be distinguished from cases of multiple authority delegation. A community engages in multiple authority delegation iff that community delegates authority over a given topic to more than one expert community. Furthermore, multiple authority delegation can be further divided into two types: hierarchical and non-hierarchical. I examine two cases of authority delegation in the art market and argue that these cases model instances of hierarchical authority delegation. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0007]: Accept the following definitions of subtypes of authority delegation: • Singular authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of singular authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to exactly one community. • Multiple authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of multiple authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to more than one community. • Hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated different degrees of authority over topic x. • Non-hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated the same degree of authority over topic x. [Sciento-2017-0008]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Monet: • A work claimed to be by Monet is authentic if it is considered authentic by the Wildenstein Institute. [Sciento-2017-0009]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Picasso: • A work claimed to be by Picasso is authentic if it is has been certified as authentic by both Maya Widmaier-Picasso and Claude Ruiz-Picasso. [Sciento-2017-0010]: Accept the following reconstruction of the authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Modigliani between 1997 and 2015: • A work claimed to be by Modigliani is authentic iff (1) it is in the Ceroni catalogue raisonné or (2) if it is not in catalogue and has been certified as authentic by Marc Restellini. [Sciento-2017-0011]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Renoir: • A work claimed to be by Renoir is authentic iff (1) it has been certified as authentic by the Wildenstein institute or (2) it has not been dismissed by the Wildenstein institute and it is included in the Bernheim-Jeune catalogue. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a theoretical scientonomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a scientific community | |
| 650 | 4 | |a authority delegation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a singular authority delegation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a multiple authority delegation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a hierarchical authority delegation | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Philosophy. Psychology. Religion | |
| 653 | 0 | |a B | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Scientonomy |d Scientonomy Community, 2019 |g 1(2017) |w (DE-627)1760623709 |x 25609076 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:2017 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.28233 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/d0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28233 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 1 |j 2017 | ||
| author_variant |
m l ml |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:25609076:2017----::utpeuhrtdlgtoiat |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.33137/js.v1i0.28233 doi (DE-627)DOAJ036639958 (DE-599)DOAJd0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Mirka Loiselle verfasserin aut Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this paper, I expand upon the research on authority delegation begun by Overgaard and myself in our 2016 paper Authority Delegation. I argue that singular authority delegation – in which a community delegates authority over a given topic to a single expert community – should be distinguished from cases of multiple authority delegation. A community engages in multiple authority delegation iff that community delegates authority over a given topic to more than one expert community. Furthermore, multiple authority delegation can be further divided into two types: hierarchical and non-hierarchical. I examine two cases of authority delegation in the art market and argue that these cases model instances of hierarchical authority delegation. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0007]: Accept the following definitions of subtypes of authority delegation: • Singular authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of singular authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to exactly one community. • Multiple authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of multiple authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to more than one community. • Hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated different degrees of authority over topic x. • Non-hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated the same degree of authority over topic x. [Sciento-2017-0008]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Monet: • A work claimed to be by Monet is authentic if it is considered authentic by the Wildenstein Institute. [Sciento-2017-0009]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Picasso: • A work claimed to be by Picasso is authentic if it is has been certified as authentic by both Maya Widmaier-Picasso and Claude Ruiz-Picasso. [Sciento-2017-0010]: Accept the following reconstruction of the authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Modigliani between 1997 and 2015: • A work claimed to be by Modigliani is authentic iff (1) it is in the Ceroni catalogue raisonné or (2) if it is not in catalogue and has been certified as authentic by Marc Restellini. [Sciento-2017-0011]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Renoir: • A work claimed to be by Renoir is authentic iff (1) it has been certified as authentic by the Wildenstein institute or (2) it has not been dismissed by the Wildenstein institute and it is included in the Bernheim-Jeune catalogue. theoretical scientonomy scientific community authority delegation singular authority delegation multiple authority delegation hierarchical authority delegation Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B In Scientonomy Scientonomy Community, 2019 1(2017) (DE-627)1760623709 25609076 nnns volume:1 year:2017 https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.28233 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416 kostenfrei https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28233 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2017 |
| spelling |
10.33137/js.v1i0.28233 doi (DE-627)DOAJ036639958 (DE-599)DOAJd0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Mirka Loiselle verfasserin aut Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this paper, I expand upon the research on authority delegation begun by Overgaard and myself in our 2016 paper Authority Delegation. I argue that singular authority delegation – in which a community delegates authority over a given topic to a single expert community – should be distinguished from cases of multiple authority delegation. A community engages in multiple authority delegation iff that community delegates authority over a given topic to more than one expert community. Furthermore, multiple authority delegation can be further divided into two types: hierarchical and non-hierarchical. I examine two cases of authority delegation in the art market and argue that these cases model instances of hierarchical authority delegation. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0007]: Accept the following definitions of subtypes of authority delegation: • Singular authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of singular authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to exactly one community. • Multiple authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of multiple authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to more than one community. • Hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated different degrees of authority over topic x. • Non-hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated the same degree of authority over topic x. [Sciento-2017-0008]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Monet: • A work claimed to be by Monet is authentic if it is considered authentic by the Wildenstein Institute. [Sciento-2017-0009]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Picasso: • A work claimed to be by Picasso is authentic if it is has been certified as authentic by both Maya Widmaier-Picasso and Claude Ruiz-Picasso. [Sciento-2017-0010]: Accept the following reconstruction of the authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Modigliani between 1997 and 2015: • A work claimed to be by Modigliani is authentic iff (1) it is in the Ceroni catalogue raisonné or (2) if it is not in catalogue and has been certified as authentic by Marc Restellini. [Sciento-2017-0011]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Renoir: • A work claimed to be by Renoir is authentic iff (1) it has been certified as authentic by the Wildenstein institute or (2) it has not been dismissed by the Wildenstein institute and it is included in the Bernheim-Jeune catalogue. theoretical scientonomy scientific community authority delegation singular authority delegation multiple authority delegation hierarchical authority delegation Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B In Scientonomy Scientonomy Community, 2019 1(2017) (DE-627)1760623709 25609076 nnns volume:1 year:2017 https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.28233 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416 kostenfrei https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28233 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2017 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.33137/js.v1i0.28233 doi (DE-627)DOAJ036639958 (DE-599)DOAJd0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Mirka Loiselle verfasserin aut Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this paper, I expand upon the research on authority delegation begun by Overgaard and myself in our 2016 paper Authority Delegation. I argue that singular authority delegation – in which a community delegates authority over a given topic to a single expert community – should be distinguished from cases of multiple authority delegation. A community engages in multiple authority delegation iff that community delegates authority over a given topic to more than one expert community. Furthermore, multiple authority delegation can be further divided into two types: hierarchical and non-hierarchical. I examine two cases of authority delegation in the art market and argue that these cases model instances of hierarchical authority delegation. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0007]: Accept the following definitions of subtypes of authority delegation: • Singular authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of singular authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to exactly one community. • Multiple authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of multiple authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to more than one community. • Hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated different degrees of authority over topic x. • Non-hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated the same degree of authority over topic x. [Sciento-2017-0008]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Monet: • A work claimed to be by Monet is authentic if it is considered authentic by the Wildenstein Institute. [Sciento-2017-0009]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Picasso: • A work claimed to be by Picasso is authentic if it is has been certified as authentic by both Maya Widmaier-Picasso and Claude Ruiz-Picasso. [Sciento-2017-0010]: Accept the following reconstruction of the authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Modigliani between 1997 and 2015: • A work claimed to be by Modigliani is authentic iff (1) it is in the Ceroni catalogue raisonné or (2) if it is not in catalogue and has been certified as authentic by Marc Restellini. [Sciento-2017-0011]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Renoir: • A work claimed to be by Renoir is authentic iff (1) it has been certified as authentic by the Wildenstein institute or (2) it has not been dismissed by the Wildenstein institute and it is included in the Bernheim-Jeune catalogue. theoretical scientonomy scientific community authority delegation singular authority delegation multiple authority delegation hierarchical authority delegation Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B In Scientonomy Scientonomy Community, 2019 1(2017) (DE-627)1760623709 25609076 nnns volume:1 year:2017 https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.28233 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416 kostenfrei https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28233 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2017 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.33137/js.v1i0.28233 doi (DE-627)DOAJ036639958 (DE-599)DOAJd0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Mirka Loiselle verfasserin aut Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this paper, I expand upon the research on authority delegation begun by Overgaard and myself in our 2016 paper Authority Delegation. I argue that singular authority delegation – in which a community delegates authority over a given topic to a single expert community – should be distinguished from cases of multiple authority delegation. A community engages in multiple authority delegation iff that community delegates authority over a given topic to more than one expert community. Furthermore, multiple authority delegation can be further divided into two types: hierarchical and non-hierarchical. I examine two cases of authority delegation in the art market and argue that these cases model instances of hierarchical authority delegation. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0007]: Accept the following definitions of subtypes of authority delegation: • Singular authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of singular authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to exactly one community. • Multiple authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of multiple authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to more than one community. • Hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated different degrees of authority over topic x. • Non-hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated the same degree of authority over topic x. [Sciento-2017-0008]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Monet: • A work claimed to be by Monet is authentic if it is considered authentic by the Wildenstein Institute. [Sciento-2017-0009]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Picasso: • A work claimed to be by Picasso is authentic if it is has been certified as authentic by both Maya Widmaier-Picasso and Claude Ruiz-Picasso. [Sciento-2017-0010]: Accept the following reconstruction of the authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Modigliani between 1997 and 2015: • A work claimed to be by Modigliani is authentic iff (1) it is in the Ceroni catalogue raisonné or (2) if it is not in catalogue and has been certified as authentic by Marc Restellini. [Sciento-2017-0011]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Renoir: • A work claimed to be by Renoir is authentic iff (1) it has been certified as authentic by the Wildenstein institute or (2) it has not been dismissed by the Wildenstein institute and it is included in the Bernheim-Jeune catalogue. theoretical scientonomy scientific community authority delegation singular authority delegation multiple authority delegation hierarchical authority delegation Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B In Scientonomy Scientonomy Community, 2019 1(2017) (DE-627)1760623709 25609076 nnns volume:1 year:2017 https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.28233 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416 kostenfrei https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28233 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2017 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.33137/js.v1i0.28233 doi (DE-627)DOAJ036639958 (DE-599)DOAJd0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Mirka Loiselle verfasserin aut Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this paper, I expand upon the research on authority delegation begun by Overgaard and myself in our 2016 paper Authority Delegation. I argue that singular authority delegation – in which a community delegates authority over a given topic to a single expert community – should be distinguished from cases of multiple authority delegation. A community engages in multiple authority delegation iff that community delegates authority over a given topic to more than one expert community. Furthermore, multiple authority delegation can be further divided into two types: hierarchical and non-hierarchical. I examine two cases of authority delegation in the art market and argue that these cases model instances of hierarchical authority delegation. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0007]: Accept the following definitions of subtypes of authority delegation: • Singular authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of singular authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to exactly one community. • Multiple authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of multiple authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to more than one community. • Hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated different degrees of authority over topic x. • Non-hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated the same degree of authority over topic x. [Sciento-2017-0008]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Monet: • A work claimed to be by Monet is authentic if it is considered authentic by the Wildenstein Institute. [Sciento-2017-0009]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Picasso: • A work claimed to be by Picasso is authentic if it is has been certified as authentic by both Maya Widmaier-Picasso and Claude Ruiz-Picasso. [Sciento-2017-0010]: Accept the following reconstruction of the authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Modigliani between 1997 and 2015: • A work claimed to be by Modigliani is authentic iff (1) it is in the Ceroni catalogue raisonné or (2) if it is not in catalogue and has been certified as authentic by Marc Restellini. [Sciento-2017-0011]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Renoir: • A work claimed to be by Renoir is authentic iff (1) it has been certified as authentic by the Wildenstein institute or (2) it has not been dismissed by the Wildenstein institute and it is included in the Bernheim-Jeune catalogue. theoretical scientonomy scientific community authority delegation singular authority delegation multiple authority delegation hierarchical authority delegation Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B In Scientonomy Scientonomy Community, 2019 1(2017) (DE-627)1760623709 25609076 nnns volume:1 year:2017 https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.28233 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416 kostenfrei https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28233 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2017 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Scientonomy 1(2017) volume:1 year:2017 |
| sourceStr |
In Scientonomy 1(2017) volume:1 year:2017 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
theoretical scientonomy scientific community authority delegation singular authority delegation multiple authority delegation hierarchical authority delegation Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Scientonomy |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Mirka Loiselle @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760623709 |
| id |
DOAJ036639958 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ036639958</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307232408.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.33137/js.v1i0.28233</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ036639958</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mirka Loiselle</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this paper, I expand upon the research on authority delegation begun by Overgaard and myself in our 2016 paper Authority Delegation. I argue that singular authority delegation – in which a community delegates authority over a given topic to a single expert community – should be distinguished from cases of multiple authority delegation. A community engages in multiple authority delegation iff that community delegates authority over a given topic to more than one expert community. Furthermore, multiple authority delegation can be further divided into two types: hierarchical and non-hierarchical. I examine two cases of authority delegation in the art market and argue that these cases model instances of hierarchical authority delegation. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0007]: Accept the following definitions of subtypes of authority delegation: • Singular authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of singular authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to exactly one community. • Multiple authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of multiple authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to more than one community. • Hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated different degrees of authority over topic x. • Non-hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated the same degree of authority over topic x. [Sciento-2017-0008]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Monet: • A work claimed to be by Monet is authentic if it is considered authentic by the Wildenstein Institute. [Sciento-2017-0009]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Picasso: • A work claimed to be by Picasso is authentic if it is has been certified as authentic by both Maya Widmaier-Picasso and Claude Ruiz-Picasso. [Sciento-2017-0010]: Accept the following reconstruction of the authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Modigliani between 1997 and 2015: • A work claimed to be by Modigliani is authentic iff (1) it is in the Ceroni catalogue raisonné or (2) if it is not in catalogue and has been certified as authentic by Marc Restellini. [Sciento-2017-0011]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Renoir: • A work claimed to be by Renoir is authentic iff (1) it has been certified as authentic by the Wildenstein institute or (2) it has not been dismissed by the Wildenstein institute and it is included in the Bernheim-Jeune catalogue.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">theoretical scientonomy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scientific community</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">authority delegation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">singular authority delegation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">multiple authority delegation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hierarchical authority delegation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy. Psychology. Religion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Scientonomy</subfield><subfield code="d">Scientonomy Community, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2017)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760623709</subfield><subfield code="x">25609076</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.28233</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28233</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Mirka Loiselle |
| spellingShingle |
Mirka Loiselle misc theoretical scientonomy misc scientific community misc authority delegation misc singular authority delegation misc multiple authority delegation misc hierarchical authority delegation misc Philosophy. Psychology. Religion misc B Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication |
| authorStr |
Mirka Loiselle |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760623709 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
25609076 |
| topic_title |
Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication theoretical scientonomy scientific community authority delegation singular authority delegation multiple authority delegation hierarchical authority delegation |
| topic |
misc theoretical scientonomy misc scientific community misc authority delegation misc singular authority delegation misc multiple authority delegation misc hierarchical authority delegation misc Philosophy. Psychology. Religion misc B |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc theoretical scientonomy misc scientific community misc authority delegation misc singular authority delegation misc multiple authority delegation misc hierarchical authority delegation misc Philosophy. Psychology. Religion misc B |
| topic_browse |
misc theoretical scientonomy misc scientific community misc authority delegation misc singular authority delegation misc multiple authority delegation misc hierarchical authority delegation misc Philosophy. Psychology. Religion misc B |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Scientonomy |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760623709 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Scientonomy |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760623709 |
| title |
Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ036639958 (DE-599)DOAJd0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416 |
| title_full |
Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication |
| author_sort |
Mirka Loiselle |
| journal |
Scientonomy |
| journalStr |
Scientonomy |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Mirka Loiselle |
| container_volume |
1 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Mirka Loiselle |
| doi_str_mv |
10.33137/js.v1i0.28233 |
| title_sort |
multiple authority delegation in art authentication |
| title_auth |
Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication |
| abstract |
In this paper, I expand upon the research on authority delegation begun by Overgaard and myself in our 2016 paper Authority Delegation. I argue that singular authority delegation – in which a community delegates authority over a given topic to a single expert community – should be distinguished from cases of multiple authority delegation. A community engages in multiple authority delegation iff that community delegates authority over a given topic to more than one expert community. Furthermore, multiple authority delegation can be further divided into two types: hierarchical and non-hierarchical. I examine two cases of authority delegation in the art market and argue that these cases model instances of hierarchical authority delegation. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0007]: Accept the following definitions of subtypes of authority delegation: • Singular authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of singular authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to exactly one community. • Multiple authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of multiple authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to more than one community. • Hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated different degrees of authority over topic x. • Non-hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated the same degree of authority over topic x. [Sciento-2017-0008]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Monet: • A work claimed to be by Monet is authentic if it is considered authentic by the Wildenstein Institute. [Sciento-2017-0009]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Picasso: • A work claimed to be by Picasso is authentic if it is has been certified as authentic by both Maya Widmaier-Picasso and Claude Ruiz-Picasso. [Sciento-2017-0010]: Accept the following reconstruction of the authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Modigliani between 1997 and 2015: • A work claimed to be by Modigliani is authentic iff (1) it is in the Ceroni catalogue raisonné or (2) if it is not in catalogue and has been certified as authentic by Marc Restellini. [Sciento-2017-0011]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Renoir: • A work claimed to be by Renoir is authentic iff (1) it has been certified as authentic by the Wildenstein institute or (2) it has not been dismissed by the Wildenstein institute and it is included in the Bernheim-Jeune catalogue. |
| abstractGer |
In this paper, I expand upon the research on authority delegation begun by Overgaard and myself in our 2016 paper Authority Delegation. I argue that singular authority delegation – in which a community delegates authority over a given topic to a single expert community – should be distinguished from cases of multiple authority delegation. A community engages in multiple authority delegation iff that community delegates authority over a given topic to more than one expert community. Furthermore, multiple authority delegation can be further divided into two types: hierarchical and non-hierarchical. I examine two cases of authority delegation in the art market and argue that these cases model instances of hierarchical authority delegation. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0007]: Accept the following definitions of subtypes of authority delegation: • Singular authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of singular authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to exactly one community. • Multiple authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of multiple authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to more than one community. • Hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated different degrees of authority over topic x. • Non-hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated the same degree of authority over topic x. [Sciento-2017-0008]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Monet: • A work claimed to be by Monet is authentic if it is considered authentic by the Wildenstein Institute. [Sciento-2017-0009]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Picasso: • A work claimed to be by Picasso is authentic if it is has been certified as authentic by both Maya Widmaier-Picasso and Claude Ruiz-Picasso. [Sciento-2017-0010]: Accept the following reconstruction of the authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Modigliani between 1997 and 2015: • A work claimed to be by Modigliani is authentic iff (1) it is in the Ceroni catalogue raisonné or (2) if it is not in catalogue and has been certified as authentic by Marc Restellini. [Sciento-2017-0011]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Renoir: • A work claimed to be by Renoir is authentic iff (1) it has been certified as authentic by the Wildenstein institute or (2) it has not been dismissed by the Wildenstein institute and it is included in the Bernheim-Jeune catalogue. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In this paper, I expand upon the research on authority delegation begun by Overgaard and myself in our 2016 paper Authority Delegation. I argue that singular authority delegation – in which a community delegates authority over a given topic to a single expert community – should be distinguished from cases of multiple authority delegation. A community engages in multiple authority delegation iff that community delegates authority over a given topic to more than one expert community. Furthermore, multiple authority delegation can be further divided into two types: hierarchical and non-hierarchical. I examine two cases of authority delegation in the art market and argue that these cases model instances of hierarchical authority delegation. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0007]: Accept the following definitions of subtypes of authority delegation: • Singular authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of singular authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to exactly one community. • Multiple authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of multiple authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to more than one community. • Hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated different degrees of authority over topic x. • Non-hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated the same degree of authority over topic x. [Sciento-2017-0008]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Monet: • A work claimed to be by Monet is authentic if it is considered authentic by the Wildenstein Institute. [Sciento-2017-0009]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Picasso: • A work claimed to be by Picasso is authentic if it is has been certified as authentic by both Maya Widmaier-Picasso and Claude Ruiz-Picasso. [Sciento-2017-0010]: Accept the following reconstruction of the authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Modigliani between 1997 and 2015: • A work claimed to be by Modigliani is authentic iff (1) it is in the Ceroni catalogue raisonné or (2) if it is not in catalogue and has been certified as authentic by Marc Restellini. [Sciento-2017-0011]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Renoir: • A work claimed to be by Renoir is authentic iff (1) it has been certified as authentic by the Wildenstein institute or (2) it has not been dismissed by the Wildenstein institute and it is included in the Bernheim-Jeune catalogue. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| title_short |
Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.28233 https://doaj.org/article/d0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416 https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28233 https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
1760623709 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.33137/js.v1i0.28233 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T21:42:45.315Z |
| _version_ |
1803595772400238592 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ036639958</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307232408.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.33137/js.v1i0.28233</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ036639958</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mirka Loiselle</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this paper, I expand upon the research on authority delegation begun by Overgaard and myself in our 2016 paper Authority Delegation. I argue that singular authority delegation – in which a community delegates authority over a given topic to a single expert community – should be distinguished from cases of multiple authority delegation. A community engages in multiple authority delegation iff that community delegates authority over a given topic to more than one expert community. Furthermore, multiple authority delegation can be further divided into two types: hierarchical and non-hierarchical. I examine two cases of authority delegation in the art market and argue that these cases model instances of hierarchical authority delegation. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0007]: Accept the following definitions of subtypes of authority delegation: • Singular authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of singular authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to exactly one community. • Multiple authority delegation ≡ community A is said to engage in a relationship of multiple authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to more than one community. • Hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated different degrees of authority over topic x. • Non-hierarchical authority delegation ≡ a sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated the same degree of authority over topic x. [Sciento-2017-0008]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Monet: • A work claimed to be by Monet is authentic if it is considered authentic by the Wildenstein Institute. [Sciento-2017-0009]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Picasso: • A work claimed to be by Picasso is authentic if it is has been certified as authentic by both Maya Widmaier-Picasso and Claude Ruiz-Picasso. [Sciento-2017-0010]: Accept the following reconstruction of the authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Modigliani between 1997 and 2015: • A work claimed to be by Modigliani is authentic iff (1) it is in the Ceroni catalogue raisonné or (2) if it is not in catalogue and has been certified as authentic by Marc Restellini. [Sciento-2017-0011]: Accept the following reconstruction of the contemporary authority delegation structure in the art market regarding the works of Renoir: • A work claimed to be by Renoir is authentic iff (1) it has been certified as authentic by the Wildenstein institute or (2) it has not been dismissed by the Wildenstein institute and it is included in the Bernheim-Jeune catalogue.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">theoretical scientonomy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scientific community</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">authority delegation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">singular authority delegation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">multiple authority delegation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hierarchical authority delegation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy. Psychology. Religion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Scientonomy</subfield><subfield code="d">Scientonomy Community, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2017)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760623709</subfield><subfield code="x">25609076</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.28233</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d0904a91c9c04ce7994ed30f18a57416</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28233</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398258 |