Risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery
In this study; we tried to compile risk scoring systems (Original EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS) used in robotic surgery, minimally invasive cardiac surgery and open-heart surgery in the context of the literature.As a result, literature study of risk scoring systems in the robotic surgery was not...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Habib Cakir [verfasserIn] Ismail Yurekli [verfasserIn] Koksal Donmez [verfasserIn] Hasan Iner [verfasserIn] Ihsan Peker [verfasserIn] Erturk Karaagac [verfasserIn] Ozcan Gur [verfasserIn] Mert Kestelli [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2018 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Medicine Science ; 7(2018), 4, Seite 959-61 volume:7 ; year:2018 ; number:4 ; pages:959-61 |
---|
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ036640050 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ036640050 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240413085126.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230227s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ036640050 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJc172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 0 | |a Habib Cakir |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery |
264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In this study; we tried to compile risk scoring systems (Original EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS) used in robotic surgery, minimally invasive cardiac surgery and open-heart surgery in the context of the literature.As a result, literature study of risk scoring systems in the robotic surgery was not found. In minimally invasive cardiac surgery, few studies are available. The effectiveness of existing risk scoring systems has not been established in these studies. Therefore, further investigations are required for developing risk scoring systems in robotic surgery and minimally invasive cardiac surgery. In open heart surgery, there is still no gold standard scoring system in all populations. Due to the increased case diversity, we believe that the commonly used risk scoring systems must be updated. Widely used risk-scoring systems are not effective in minimally invasive cardiac surgery and this is supporting our idea. Each clinic should choose the appropriate risk scoring system according to their own experience and case diversity. [Med-Science 2018; 7(4.000): 959-61] | ||
650 | 4 | |a Robotic surgery | |
650 | 4 | |a minimal invasive heart surgery | |
650 | 4 | |a heart surgery | |
650 | 4 | |a risk model | |
653 | 0 | |a Medicine | |
653 | 0 | |a R | |
700 | 0 | |a Ismail Yurekli |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Koksal Donmez |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Hasan Iner |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Ihsan Peker |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Erturk Karaagac |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Ozcan Gur |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Mert Kestelli |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Medicine Science |g 7(2018), 4, Seite 959-61 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:2018 |g number:4 |g pages:959-61 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/c172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=1850 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2147-0634 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 7 |j 2018 |e 4 |h 959-61 |
author_variant |
h c hc i y iy k d kd h i hi i p ip e k ek o g og m k mk |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
habibcakirismailyureklikoksaldonmezhasan:2018----:ikoesoptetudronrbtcugrmnmlnaieers |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2018 |
publishDate |
2018 |
allfields |
10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862 doi (DE-627)DOAJ036640050 (DE-599)DOAJc172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Habib Cakir verfasserin aut Risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this study; we tried to compile risk scoring systems (Original EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS) used in robotic surgery, minimally invasive cardiac surgery and open-heart surgery in the context of the literature.As a result, literature study of risk scoring systems in the robotic surgery was not found. In minimally invasive cardiac surgery, few studies are available. The effectiveness of existing risk scoring systems has not been established in these studies. Therefore, further investigations are required for developing risk scoring systems in robotic surgery and minimally invasive cardiac surgery. In open heart surgery, there is still no gold standard scoring system in all populations. Due to the increased case diversity, we believe that the commonly used risk scoring systems must be updated. Widely used risk-scoring systems are not effective in minimally invasive cardiac surgery and this is supporting our idea. Each clinic should choose the appropriate risk scoring system according to their own experience and case diversity. [Med-Science 2018; 7(4.000): 959-61] Robotic surgery minimal invasive heart surgery heart surgery risk model Medicine R Ismail Yurekli verfasserin aut Koksal Donmez verfasserin aut Hasan Iner verfasserin aut Ihsan Peker verfasserin aut Erturk Karaagac verfasserin aut Ozcan Gur verfasserin aut Mert Kestelli verfasserin aut In Medicine Science 7(2018), 4, Seite 959-61 volume:7 year:2018 number:4 pages:959-61 https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32 kostenfrei http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=1850 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2147-0634 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 7 2018 4 959-61 |
spelling |
10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862 doi (DE-627)DOAJ036640050 (DE-599)DOAJc172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Habib Cakir verfasserin aut Risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this study; we tried to compile risk scoring systems (Original EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS) used in robotic surgery, minimally invasive cardiac surgery and open-heart surgery in the context of the literature.As a result, literature study of risk scoring systems in the robotic surgery was not found. In minimally invasive cardiac surgery, few studies are available. The effectiveness of existing risk scoring systems has not been established in these studies. Therefore, further investigations are required for developing risk scoring systems in robotic surgery and minimally invasive cardiac surgery. In open heart surgery, there is still no gold standard scoring system in all populations. Due to the increased case diversity, we believe that the commonly used risk scoring systems must be updated. Widely used risk-scoring systems are not effective in minimally invasive cardiac surgery and this is supporting our idea. Each clinic should choose the appropriate risk scoring system according to their own experience and case diversity. [Med-Science 2018; 7(4.000): 959-61] Robotic surgery minimal invasive heart surgery heart surgery risk model Medicine R Ismail Yurekli verfasserin aut Koksal Donmez verfasserin aut Hasan Iner verfasserin aut Ihsan Peker verfasserin aut Erturk Karaagac verfasserin aut Ozcan Gur verfasserin aut Mert Kestelli verfasserin aut In Medicine Science 7(2018), 4, Seite 959-61 volume:7 year:2018 number:4 pages:959-61 https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32 kostenfrei http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=1850 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2147-0634 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 7 2018 4 959-61 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862 doi (DE-627)DOAJ036640050 (DE-599)DOAJc172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Habib Cakir verfasserin aut Risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this study; we tried to compile risk scoring systems (Original EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS) used in robotic surgery, minimally invasive cardiac surgery and open-heart surgery in the context of the literature.As a result, literature study of risk scoring systems in the robotic surgery was not found. In minimally invasive cardiac surgery, few studies are available. The effectiveness of existing risk scoring systems has not been established in these studies. Therefore, further investigations are required for developing risk scoring systems in robotic surgery and minimally invasive cardiac surgery. In open heart surgery, there is still no gold standard scoring system in all populations. Due to the increased case diversity, we believe that the commonly used risk scoring systems must be updated. Widely used risk-scoring systems are not effective in minimally invasive cardiac surgery and this is supporting our idea. Each clinic should choose the appropriate risk scoring system according to their own experience and case diversity. [Med-Science 2018; 7(4.000): 959-61] Robotic surgery minimal invasive heart surgery heart surgery risk model Medicine R Ismail Yurekli verfasserin aut Koksal Donmez verfasserin aut Hasan Iner verfasserin aut Ihsan Peker verfasserin aut Erturk Karaagac verfasserin aut Ozcan Gur verfasserin aut Mert Kestelli verfasserin aut In Medicine Science 7(2018), 4, Seite 959-61 volume:7 year:2018 number:4 pages:959-61 https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32 kostenfrei http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=1850 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2147-0634 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 7 2018 4 959-61 |
allfieldsGer |
10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862 doi (DE-627)DOAJ036640050 (DE-599)DOAJc172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Habib Cakir verfasserin aut Risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this study; we tried to compile risk scoring systems (Original EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS) used in robotic surgery, minimally invasive cardiac surgery and open-heart surgery in the context of the literature.As a result, literature study of risk scoring systems in the robotic surgery was not found. In minimally invasive cardiac surgery, few studies are available. The effectiveness of existing risk scoring systems has not been established in these studies. Therefore, further investigations are required for developing risk scoring systems in robotic surgery and minimally invasive cardiac surgery. In open heart surgery, there is still no gold standard scoring system in all populations. Due to the increased case diversity, we believe that the commonly used risk scoring systems must be updated. Widely used risk-scoring systems are not effective in minimally invasive cardiac surgery and this is supporting our idea. Each clinic should choose the appropriate risk scoring system according to their own experience and case diversity. [Med-Science 2018; 7(4.000): 959-61] Robotic surgery minimal invasive heart surgery heart surgery risk model Medicine R Ismail Yurekli verfasserin aut Koksal Donmez verfasserin aut Hasan Iner verfasserin aut Ihsan Peker verfasserin aut Erturk Karaagac verfasserin aut Ozcan Gur verfasserin aut Mert Kestelli verfasserin aut In Medicine Science 7(2018), 4, Seite 959-61 volume:7 year:2018 number:4 pages:959-61 https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32 kostenfrei http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=1850 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2147-0634 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 7 2018 4 959-61 |
allfieldsSound |
10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862 doi (DE-627)DOAJ036640050 (DE-599)DOAJc172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Habib Cakir verfasserin aut Risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this study; we tried to compile risk scoring systems (Original EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS) used in robotic surgery, minimally invasive cardiac surgery and open-heart surgery in the context of the literature.As a result, literature study of risk scoring systems in the robotic surgery was not found. In minimally invasive cardiac surgery, few studies are available. The effectiveness of existing risk scoring systems has not been established in these studies. Therefore, further investigations are required for developing risk scoring systems in robotic surgery and minimally invasive cardiac surgery. In open heart surgery, there is still no gold standard scoring system in all populations. Due to the increased case diversity, we believe that the commonly used risk scoring systems must be updated. Widely used risk-scoring systems are not effective in minimally invasive cardiac surgery and this is supporting our idea. Each clinic should choose the appropriate risk scoring system according to their own experience and case diversity. [Med-Science 2018; 7(4.000): 959-61] Robotic surgery minimal invasive heart surgery heart surgery risk model Medicine R Ismail Yurekli verfasserin aut Koksal Donmez verfasserin aut Hasan Iner verfasserin aut Ihsan Peker verfasserin aut Erturk Karaagac verfasserin aut Ozcan Gur verfasserin aut Mert Kestelli verfasserin aut In Medicine Science 7(2018), 4, Seite 959-61 volume:7 year:2018 number:4 pages:959-61 https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32 kostenfrei http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=1850 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2147-0634 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 7 2018 4 959-61 |
language |
English |
source |
In Medicine Science 7(2018), 4, Seite 959-61 volume:7 year:2018 number:4 pages:959-61 |
sourceStr |
In Medicine Science 7(2018), 4, Seite 959-61 volume:7 year:2018 number:4 pages:959-61 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Robotic surgery minimal invasive heart surgery heart surgery risk model Medicine R |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Medicine Science |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Habib Cakir @@aut@@ Ismail Yurekli @@aut@@ Koksal Donmez @@aut@@ Hasan Iner @@aut@@ Ihsan Peker @@aut@@ Erturk Karaagac @@aut@@ Ozcan Gur @@aut@@ Mert Kestelli @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
id |
DOAJ036640050 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ036640050</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413085126.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ036640050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJc172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Habib Cakir</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this study; we tried to compile risk scoring systems (Original EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS) used in robotic surgery, minimally invasive cardiac surgery and open-heart surgery in the context of the literature.As a result, literature study of risk scoring systems in the robotic surgery was not found. In minimally invasive cardiac surgery, few studies are available. The effectiveness of existing risk scoring systems has not been established in these studies. Therefore, further investigations are required for developing risk scoring systems in robotic surgery and minimally invasive cardiac surgery. In open heart surgery, there is still no gold standard scoring system in all populations. Due to the increased case diversity, we believe that the commonly used risk scoring systems must be updated. Widely used risk-scoring systems are not effective in minimally invasive cardiac surgery and this is supporting our idea. Each clinic should choose the appropriate risk scoring system according to their own experience and case diversity. [Med-Science 2018; 7(4.000): 959-61]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Robotic surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">minimal invasive heart surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">heart surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">risk model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ismail Yurekli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Koksal Donmez</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hasan Iner</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ihsan Peker</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Erturk Karaagac</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ozcan Gur</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mert Kestelli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Medicine Science</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2018), 4, Seite 959-61</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:959-61</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/c172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=1850</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2147-0634</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">959-61</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Habib Cakir |
spellingShingle |
Habib Cakir misc Robotic surgery misc minimal invasive heart surgery misc heart surgery misc risk model misc Medicine misc R Risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery |
authorStr |
Habib Cakir |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
Risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery Robotic surgery minimal invasive heart surgery heart surgery risk model |
topic |
misc Robotic surgery misc minimal invasive heart surgery misc heart surgery misc risk model misc Medicine misc R |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Robotic surgery misc minimal invasive heart surgery misc heart surgery misc risk model misc Medicine misc R |
topic_browse |
misc Robotic surgery misc minimal invasive heart surgery misc heart surgery misc risk model misc Medicine misc R |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Medicine Science |
hierarchy_top_title |
Medicine Science |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
title |
Risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ036640050 (DE-599)DOAJc172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32 |
title_full |
Risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery |
author_sort |
Habib Cakir |
journal |
Medicine Science |
journalStr |
Medicine Science |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2018 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
959 |
author_browse |
Habib Cakir Ismail Yurekli Koksal Donmez Hasan Iner Ihsan Peker Erturk Karaagac Ozcan Gur Mert Kestelli |
container_volume |
7 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Habib Cakir |
doi_str_mv |
10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery |
title_auth |
Risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery |
abstract |
In this study; we tried to compile risk scoring systems (Original EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS) used in robotic surgery, minimally invasive cardiac surgery and open-heart surgery in the context of the literature.As a result, literature study of risk scoring systems in the robotic surgery was not found. In minimally invasive cardiac surgery, few studies are available. The effectiveness of existing risk scoring systems has not been established in these studies. Therefore, further investigations are required for developing risk scoring systems in robotic surgery and minimally invasive cardiac surgery. In open heart surgery, there is still no gold standard scoring system in all populations. Due to the increased case diversity, we believe that the commonly used risk scoring systems must be updated. Widely used risk-scoring systems are not effective in minimally invasive cardiac surgery and this is supporting our idea. Each clinic should choose the appropriate risk scoring system according to their own experience and case diversity. [Med-Science 2018; 7(4.000): 959-61] |
abstractGer |
In this study; we tried to compile risk scoring systems (Original EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS) used in robotic surgery, minimally invasive cardiac surgery and open-heart surgery in the context of the literature.As a result, literature study of risk scoring systems in the robotic surgery was not found. In minimally invasive cardiac surgery, few studies are available. The effectiveness of existing risk scoring systems has not been established in these studies. Therefore, further investigations are required for developing risk scoring systems in robotic surgery and minimally invasive cardiac surgery. In open heart surgery, there is still no gold standard scoring system in all populations. Due to the increased case diversity, we believe that the commonly used risk scoring systems must be updated. Widely used risk-scoring systems are not effective in minimally invasive cardiac surgery and this is supporting our idea. Each clinic should choose the appropriate risk scoring system according to their own experience and case diversity. [Med-Science 2018; 7(4.000): 959-61] |
abstract_unstemmed |
In this study; we tried to compile risk scoring systems (Original EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS) used in robotic surgery, minimally invasive cardiac surgery and open-heart surgery in the context of the literature.As a result, literature study of risk scoring systems in the robotic surgery was not found. In minimally invasive cardiac surgery, few studies are available. The effectiveness of existing risk scoring systems has not been established in these studies. Therefore, further investigations are required for developing risk scoring systems in robotic surgery and minimally invasive cardiac surgery. In open heart surgery, there is still no gold standard scoring system in all populations. Due to the increased case diversity, we believe that the commonly used risk scoring systems must be updated. Widely used risk-scoring systems are not effective in minimally invasive cardiac surgery and this is supporting our idea. Each clinic should choose the appropriate risk scoring system according to their own experience and case diversity. [Med-Science 2018; 7(4.000): 959-61] |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
container_issue |
4 |
title_short |
Risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery |
url |
https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862 https://doaj.org/article/c172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32 http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=1850 https://doaj.org/toc/2147-0634 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Ismail Yurekli Koksal Donmez Hasan Iner Ihsan Peker Erturk Karaagac Ozcan Gur Mert Kestelli |
author2Str |
Ismail Yurekli Koksal Donmez Hasan Iner Ihsan Peker Erturk Karaagac Ozcan Gur Mert Kestelli |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T21:42:46.923Z |
_version_ |
1803595774089494528 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ036640050</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413085126.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ036640050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJc172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Habib Cakir</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this study; we tried to compile risk scoring systems (Original EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS) used in robotic surgery, minimally invasive cardiac surgery and open-heart surgery in the context of the literature.As a result, literature study of risk scoring systems in the robotic surgery was not found. In minimally invasive cardiac surgery, few studies are available. The effectiveness of existing risk scoring systems has not been established in these studies. Therefore, further investigations are required for developing risk scoring systems in robotic surgery and minimally invasive cardiac surgery. In open heart surgery, there is still no gold standard scoring system in all populations. Due to the increased case diversity, we believe that the commonly used risk scoring systems must be updated. Widely used risk-scoring systems are not effective in minimally invasive cardiac surgery and this is supporting our idea. Each clinic should choose the appropriate risk scoring system according to their own experience and case diversity. [Med-Science 2018; 7(4.000): 959-61]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Robotic surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">minimal invasive heart surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">heart surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">risk model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ismail Yurekli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Koksal Donmez</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hasan Iner</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ihsan Peker</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Erturk Karaagac</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ozcan Gur</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mert Kestelli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Medicine Science</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2018), 4, Seite 959-61</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:959-61</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8862</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/c172ef99925a434d908f561a48bc6a32</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=1850</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2147-0634</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">959-61</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3979874 |