The experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: A cohort study

Background/Purpose: Recurrent cellulitis is an important clinical issue but the optimal strategy for prophylaxis is not determined. Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval had been adopted in our hospital and the study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy. Methods: From January 1,...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Hsien-Meng Chen [verfasserIn] Yu-Lin Li [verfasserIn] Yuag-Meng Liu [verfasserIn] Chun-Eng Liu [verfasserIn] Yu-Ren Cheng [verfasserIn] Chang-Hua Chen [verfasserIn] Ing-Moi Hii [verfasserIn] Chih-Yen Chang [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2017

Schlagwörter:	cellulitis penicillin prophylaxis

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection - Elsevier, 2017, 50(2017), 5, Seite 613-618
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:50 ; year:2017 ; number:5 ; pages:613-618

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ037697358

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ037697358
003	DE-627
005	20230308012518.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ037697358
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a QR1-502
100	0		\|a Hsien-Meng Chen \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	4	\|a The experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: A cohort study
264		1	\|c 2017
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Background/Purpose: Recurrent cellulitis is an important clinical issue but the optimal strategy for prophylaxis is not determined. Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval had been adopted in our hospital and the study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy. Methods: From January 1, 2009 to May 31, 2013, all patients aged ≥ 18 year, with a history of recurrent cellulitis and having received at least three shots of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis were retrospectively recruited for analysis. Two treatment periods (prophylaxis period and nonprophylaxis period) were defined. The effects of benzathine penicillin prophylaxis and patient characteristics on the incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis were analyzed using Poisson regression model. Results: A total of 72 patients were enrolled, including 26 (36.1%) men. The most common underlying conditions were past surgery at the proximal side of the affected limb (38, 52.8%), malignancy (31, 43.1%), and diabetes mellitus (24, 33.3%). The incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis in the prophylaxis period was 0.73 episode/patient-year, significantly lower than that of 1.25 episodes/patient-year in the nonprophylaxis period (p < 0.001). Tinea pedis was a significant factor associated with increasing incidence of recurrent cellulitis in our cohort. Conclusion: Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval may be an effective prophylactic strategy to reduce the incidence of cellulitis. Further studies are necessary to determine the factors associated with failure of prophylaxis as well as optimal individualized dosage and dosing interval of the prophylactic agent.
650		4	\|a cellulitis
650		4	\|a penicillin
650		4	\|a prophylaxis
653		0	\|a Microbiology
700	0		\|a Yu-Lin Li \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yuag-Meng Liu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Chun-Eng Liu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yu-Ren Cheng \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Chang-Hua Chen \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Ing-Moi Hii \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Chih-Yen Chang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection \|d Elsevier, 2017 \|g 50(2017), 5, Seite 613-618 \|w (DE-627)478508638 \|w (DE-600)2175858-X \|x 16841182 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:50 \|g year:2017 \|g number:5 \|g pages:613-618
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118215008312 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1684-1182 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_101
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 50 \|j 2017 \|e 5 \|h 613-618

Indexfelder

author_variant	h m c hmc y l l yll y m l yml c e l cel y r c yrc c h c chc i m h imh c y c cyc
matchkey_str	article:16841182:2017----::heprecoitauclreztieeiilnopohlxsfeu
hierarchy_sort_str	2017
callnumber-subject-code	QR
publishDate	2017
allfields	10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008 doi (DE-627)DOAJ037697358 (DE-599)DOAJ33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QR1-502 Hsien-Meng Chen verfasserin aut The experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: A cohort study 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background/Purpose: Recurrent cellulitis is an important clinical issue but the optimal strategy for prophylaxis is not determined. Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval had been adopted in our hospital and the study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy. Methods: From January 1, 2009 to May 31, 2013, all patients aged ≥ 18 year, with a history of recurrent cellulitis and having received at least three shots of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis were retrospectively recruited for analysis. Two treatment periods (prophylaxis period and nonprophylaxis period) were defined. The effects of benzathine penicillin prophylaxis and patient characteristics on the incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis were analyzed using Poisson regression model. Results: A total of 72 patients were enrolled, including 26 (36.1%) men. The most common underlying conditions were past surgery at the proximal side of the affected limb (38, 52.8%), malignancy (31, 43.1%), and diabetes mellitus (24, 33.3%). The incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis in the prophylaxis period was 0.73 episode/patient-year, significantly lower than that of 1.25 episodes/patient-year in the nonprophylaxis period (p < 0.001). Tinea pedis was a significant factor associated with increasing incidence of recurrent cellulitis in our cohort. Conclusion: Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval may be an effective prophylactic strategy to reduce the incidence of cellulitis. Further studies are necessary to determine the factors associated with failure of prophylaxis as well as optimal individualized dosage and dosing interval of the prophylactic agent. cellulitis penicillin prophylaxis Microbiology Yu-Lin Li verfasserin aut Yuag-Meng Liu verfasserin aut Chun-Eng Liu verfasserin aut Yu-Ren Cheng verfasserin aut Chang-Hua Chen verfasserin aut Ing-Moi Hii verfasserin aut Chih-Yen Chang verfasserin aut In Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection Elsevier, 2017 50(2017), 5, Seite 613-618 (DE-627)478508638 (DE-600)2175858-X 16841182 nnns volume:50 year:2017 number:5 pages:613-618 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118215008312 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1684-1182 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 50 2017 5 613-618
spelling	10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008 doi (DE-627)DOAJ037697358 (DE-599)DOAJ33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QR1-502 Hsien-Meng Chen verfasserin aut The experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: A cohort study 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background/Purpose: Recurrent cellulitis is an important clinical issue but the optimal strategy for prophylaxis is not determined. Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval had been adopted in our hospital and the study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy. Methods: From January 1, 2009 to May 31, 2013, all patients aged ≥ 18 year, with a history of recurrent cellulitis and having received at least three shots of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis were retrospectively recruited for analysis. Two treatment periods (prophylaxis period and nonprophylaxis period) were defined. The effects of benzathine penicillin prophylaxis and patient characteristics on the incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis were analyzed using Poisson regression model. Results: A total of 72 patients were enrolled, including 26 (36.1%) men. The most common underlying conditions were past surgery at the proximal side of the affected limb (38, 52.8%), malignancy (31, 43.1%), and diabetes mellitus (24, 33.3%). The incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis in the prophylaxis period was 0.73 episode/patient-year, significantly lower than that of 1.25 episodes/patient-year in the nonprophylaxis period (p < 0.001). Tinea pedis was a significant factor associated with increasing incidence of recurrent cellulitis in our cohort. Conclusion: Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval may be an effective prophylactic strategy to reduce the incidence of cellulitis. Further studies are necessary to determine the factors associated with failure of prophylaxis as well as optimal individualized dosage and dosing interval of the prophylactic agent. cellulitis penicillin prophylaxis Microbiology Yu-Lin Li verfasserin aut Yuag-Meng Liu verfasserin aut Chun-Eng Liu verfasserin aut Yu-Ren Cheng verfasserin aut Chang-Hua Chen verfasserin aut Ing-Moi Hii verfasserin aut Chih-Yen Chang verfasserin aut In Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection Elsevier, 2017 50(2017), 5, Seite 613-618 (DE-627)478508638 (DE-600)2175858-X 16841182 nnns volume:50 year:2017 number:5 pages:613-618 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118215008312 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1684-1182 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 50 2017 5 613-618
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008 doi (DE-627)DOAJ037697358 (DE-599)DOAJ33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QR1-502 Hsien-Meng Chen verfasserin aut The experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: A cohort study 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background/Purpose: Recurrent cellulitis is an important clinical issue but the optimal strategy for prophylaxis is not determined. Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval had been adopted in our hospital and the study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy. Methods: From January 1, 2009 to May 31, 2013, all patients aged ≥ 18 year, with a history of recurrent cellulitis and having received at least three shots of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis were retrospectively recruited for analysis. Two treatment periods (prophylaxis period and nonprophylaxis period) were defined. The effects of benzathine penicillin prophylaxis and patient characteristics on the incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis were analyzed using Poisson regression model. Results: A total of 72 patients were enrolled, including 26 (36.1%) men. The most common underlying conditions were past surgery at the proximal side of the affected limb (38, 52.8%), malignancy (31, 43.1%), and diabetes mellitus (24, 33.3%). The incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis in the prophylaxis period was 0.73 episode/patient-year, significantly lower than that of 1.25 episodes/patient-year in the nonprophylaxis period (p < 0.001). Tinea pedis was a significant factor associated with increasing incidence of recurrent cellulitis in our cohort. Conclusion: Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval may be an effective prophylactic strategy to reduce the incidence of cellulitis. Further studies are necessary to determine the factors associated with failure of prophylaxis as well as optimal individualized dosage and dosing interval of the prophylactic agent. cellulitis penicillin prophylaxis Microbiology Yu-Lin Li verfasserin aut Yuag-Meng Liu verfasserin aut Chun-Eng Liu verfasserin aut Yu-Ren Cheng verfasserin aut Chang-Hua Chen verfasserin aut Ing-Moi Hii verfasserin aut Chih-Yen Chang verfasserin aut In Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection Elsevier, 2017 50(2017), 5, Seite 613-618 (DE-627)478508638 (DE-600)2175858-X 16841182 nnns volume:50 year:2017 number:5 pages:613-618 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118215008312 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1684-1182 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 50 2017 5 613-618
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008 doi (DE-627)DOAJ037697358 (DE-599)DOAJ33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QR1-502 Hsien-Meng Chen verfasserin aut The experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: A cohort study 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background/Purpose: Recurrent cellulitis is an important clinical issue but the optimal strategy for prophylaxis is not determined. Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval had been adopted in our hospital and the study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy. Methods: From January 1, 2009 to May 31, 2013, all patients aged ≥ 18 year, with a history of recurrent cellulitis and having received at least three shots of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis were retrospectively recruited for analysis. Two treatment periods (prophylaxis period and nonprophylaxis period) were defined. The effects of benzathine penicillin prophylaxis and patient characteristics on the incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis were analyzed using Poisson regression model. Results: A total of 72 patients were enrolled, including 26 (36.1%) men. The most common underlying conditions were past surgery at the proximal side of the affected limb (38, 52.8%), malignancy (31, 43.1%), and diabetes mellitus (24, 33.3%). The incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis in the prophylaxis period was 0.73 episode/patient-year, significantly lower than that of 1.25 episodes/patient-year in the nonprophylaxis period (p < 0.001). Tinea pedis was a significant factor associated with increasing incidence of recurrent cellulitis in our cohort. Conclusion: Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval may be an effective prophylactic strategy to reduce the incidence of cellulitis. Further studies are necessary to determine the factors associated with failure of prophylaxis as well as optimal individualized dosage and dosing interval of the prophylactic agent. cellulitis penicillin prophylaxis Microbiology Yu-Lin Li verfasserin aut Yuag-Meng Liu verfasserin aut Chun-Eng Liu verfasserin aut Yu-Ren Cheng verfasserin aut Chang-Hua Chen verfasserin aut Ing-Moi Hii verfasserin aut Chih-Yen Chang verfasserin aut In Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection Elsevier, 2017 50(2017), 5, Seite 613-618 (DE-627)478508638 (DE-600)2175858-X 16841182 nnns volume:50 year:2017 number:5 pages:613-618 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118215008312 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1684-1182 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 50 2017 5 613-618
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008 doi (DE-627)DOAJ037697358 (DE-599)DOAJ33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QR1-502 Hsien-Meng Chen verfasserin aut The experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: A cohort study 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background/Purpose: Recurrent cellulitis is an important clinical issue but the optimal strategy for prophylaxis is not determined. Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval had been adopted in our hospital and the study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy. Methods: From January 1, 2009 to May 31, 2013, all patients aged ≥ 18 year, with a history of recurrent cellulitis and having received at least three shots of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis were retrospectively recruited for analysis. Two treatment periods (prophylaxis period and nonprophylaxis period) were defined. The effects of benzathine penicillin prophylaxis and patient characteristics on the incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis were analyzed using Poisson regression model. Results: A total of 72 patients were enrolled, including 26 (36.1%) men. The most common underlying conditions were past surgery at the proximal side of the affected limb (38, 52.8%), malignancy (31, 43.1%), and diabetes mellitus (24, 33.3%). The incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis in the prophylaxis period was 0.73 episode/patient-year, significantly lower than that of 1.25 episodes/patient-year in the nonprophylaxis period (p < 0.001). Tinea pedis was a significant factor associated with increasing incidence of recurrent cellulitis in our cohort. Conclusion: Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval may be an effective prophylactic strategy to reduce the incidence of cellulitis. Further studies are necessary to determine the factors associated with failure of prophylaxis as well as optimal individualized dosage and dosing interval of the prophylactic agent. cellulitis penicillin prophylaxis Microbiology Yu-Lin Li verfasserin aut Yuag-Meng Liu verfasserin aut Chun-Eng Liu verfasserin aut Yu-Ren Cheng verfasserin aut Chang-Hua Chen verfasserin aut Ing-Moi Hii verfasserin aut Chih-Yen Chang verfasserin aut In Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection Elsevier, 2017 50(2017), 5, Seite 613-618 (DE-627)478508638 (DE-600)2175858-X 16841182 nnns volume:50 year:2017 number:5 pages:613-618 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118215008312 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1684-1182 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 50 2017 5 613-618
language	English
source	In Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection 50(2017), 5, Seite 613-618 volume:50 year:2017 number:5 pages:613-618
sourceStr	In Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection 50(2017), 5, Seite 613-618 volume:50 year:2017 number:5 pages:613-618
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	cellulitis penicillin prophylaxis Microbiology
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Hsien-Meng Chen @@aut@@ Yu-Lin Li @@aut@@ Yuag-Meng Liu @@aut@@ Chun-Eng Liu @@aut@@ Yu-Ren Cheng @@aut@@ Chang-Hua Chen @@aut@@ Ing-Moi Hii @@aut@@ Chih-Yen Chang @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	478508638
id	DOAJ037697358
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ037697358</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308012518.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ037697358</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QR1-502</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hsien-Meng Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: A cohort study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background/Purpose: Recurrent cellulitis is an important clinical issue but the optimal strategy for prophylaxis is not determined. Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval had been adopted in our hospital and the study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy. Methods: From January 1, 2009 to May 31, 2013, all patients aged ≥ 18 year, with a history of recurrent cellulitis and having received at least three shots of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis were retrospectively recruited for analysis. Two treatment periods (prophylaxis period and nonprophylaxis period) were defined. The effects of benzathine penicillin prophylaxis and patient characteristics on the incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis were analyzed using Poisson regression model. Results: A total of 72 patients were enrolled, including 26 (36.1%) men. The most common underlying conditions were past surgery at the proximal side of the affected limb (38, 52.8%), malignancy (31, 43.1%), and diabetes mellitus (24, 33.3%). The incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis in the prophylaxis period was 0.73 episode/patient-year, significantly lower than that of 1.25 episodes/patient-year in the nonprophylaxis period (p < 0.001). Tinea pedis was a significant factor associated with increasing incidence of recurrent cellulitis in our cohort. Conclusion: Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval may be an effective prophylactic strategy to reduce the incidence of cellulitis. Further studies are necessary to determine the factors associated with failure of prophylaxis as well as optimal individualized dosage and dosing interval of the prophylactic agent.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cellulitis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">penicillin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">prophylaxis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Microbiology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yu-Lin Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yuag-Meng Liu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chun-Eng Liu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yu-Ren Cheng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chang-Hua Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ing-Moi Hii</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chih-Yen Chang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">50(2017), 5, Seite 613-618</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)478508638</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2175858-X</subfield><subfield code="x">16841182</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:50</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:613-618</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118215008312</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1684-1182</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">50</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">613-618</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	Q - Science
author	Hsien-Meng Chen
spellingShingle	Hsien-Meng Chen misc QR1-502 misc cellulitis misc penicillin misc prophylaxis misc Microbiology The experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: A cohort study
authorStr	Hsien-Meng Chen
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)478508638
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	QR1-502
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	16841182
topic_title	QR1-502 The experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: A cohort study cellulitis penicillin prophylaxis
topic	misc QR1-502 misc cellulitis misc penicillin misc prophylaxis misc Microbiology
topic_unstemmed	misc QR1-502 misc cellulitis misc penicillin misc prophylaxis misc Microbiology
topic_browse	misc QR1-502 misc cellulitis misc penicillin misc prophylaxis misc Microbiology
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection
hierarchy_parent_id	478508638
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)478508638 (DE-600)2175858-X
title	The experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: A cohort study
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ037697358 (DE-599)DOAJ33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c
title_full	The experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: A cohort study
author_sort	Hsien-Meng Chen
journal	Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection
journalStr	Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection
callnumber-first-code	Q
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2017
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	613
author_browse	Hsien-Meng Chen Yu-Lin Li Yuag-Meng Liu Chun-Eng Liu Yu-Ren Cheng Chang-Hua Chen Ing-Moi Hii Chih-Yen Chang
container_volume	50
class	QR1-502
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Hsien-Meng Chen
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: a cohort study
callnumber	QR1-502
title_auth	The experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: A cohort study
abstract	Background/Purpose: Recurrent cellulitis is an important clinical issue but the optimal strategy for prophylaxis is not determined. Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval had been adopted in our hospital and the study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy. Methods: From January 1, 2009 to May 31, 2013, all patients aged ≥ 18 year, with a history of recurrent cellulitis and having received at least three shots of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis were retrospectively recruited for analysis. Two treatment periods (prophylaxis period and nonprophylaxis period) were defined. The effects of benzathine penicillin prophylaxis and patient characteristics on the incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis were analyzed using Poisson regression model. Results: A total of 72 patients were enrolled, including 26 (36.1%) men. The most common underlying conditions were past surgery at the proximal side of the affected limb (38, 52.8%), malignancy (31, 43.1%), and diabetes mellitus (24, 33.3%). The incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis in the prophylaxis period was 0.73 episode/patient-year, significantly lower than that of 1.25 episodes/patient-year in the nonprophylaxis period (p < 0.001). Tinea pedis was a significant factor associated with increasing incidence of recurrent cellulitis in our cohort. Conclusion: Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval may be an effective prophylactic strategy to reduce the incidence of cellulitis. Further studies are necessary to determine the factors associated with failure of prophylaxis as well as optimal individualized dosage and dosing interval of the prophylactic agent.
abstractGer	Background/Purpose: Recurrent cellulitis is an important clinical issue but the optimal strategy for prophylaxis is not determined. Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval had been adopted in our hospital and the study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy. Methods: From January 1, 2009 to May 31, 2013, all patients aged ≥ 18 year, with a history of recurrent cellulitis and having received at least three shots of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis were retrospectively recruited for analysis. Two treatment periods (prophylaxis period and nonprophylaxis period) were defined. The effects of benzathine penicillin prophylaxis and patient characteristics on the incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis were analyzed using Poisson regression model. Results: A total of 72 patients were enrolled, including 26 (36.1%) men. The most common underlying conditions were past surgery at the proximal side of the affected limb (38, 52.8%), malignancy (31, 43.1%), and diabetes mellitus (24, 33.3%). The incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis in the prophylaxis period was 0.73 episode/patient-year, significantly lower than that of 1.25 episodes/patient-year in the nonprophylaxis period (p < 0.001). Tinea pedis was a significant factor associated with increasing incidence of recurrent cellulitis in our cohort. Conclusion: Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval may be an effective prophylactic strategy to reduce the incidence of cellulitis. Further studies are necessary to determine the factors associated with failure of prophylaxis as well as optimal individualized dosage and dosing interval of the prophylactic agent.
abstract_unstemmed	Background/Purpose: Recurrent cellulitis is an important clinical issue but the optimal strategy for prophylaxis is not determined. Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval had been adopted in our hospital and the study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy. Methods: From January 1, 2009 to May 31, 2013, all patients aged ≥ 18 year, with a history of recurrent cellulitis and having received at least three shots of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis were retrospectively recruited for analysis. Two treatment periods (prophylaxis period and nonprophylaxis period) were defined. The effects of benzathine penicillin prophylaxis and patient characteristics on the incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis were analyzed using Poisson regression model. Results: A total of 72 patients were enrolled, including 26 (36.1%) men. The most common underlying conditions were past surgery at the proximal side of the affected limb (38, 52.8%), malignancy (31, 43.1%), and diabetes mellitus (24, 33.3%). The incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis in the prophylaxis period was 0.73 episode/patient-year, significantly lower than that of 1.25 episodes/patient-year in the nonprophylaxis period (p < 0.001). Tinea pedis was a significant factor associated with increasing incidence of recurrent cellulitis in our cohort. Conclusion: Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval may be an effective prophylactic strategy to reduce the incidence of cellulitis. Further studies are necessary to determine the factors associated with failure of prophylaxis as well as optimal individualized dosage and dosing interval of the prophylactic agent.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	5
title_short	The experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: A cohort study
url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008 https://doaj.org/article/33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118215008312 https://doaj.org/toc/1684-1182
remote_bool	true
author2	Yu-Lin Li Yuag-Meng Liu Chun-Eng Liu Yu-Ren Cheng Chang-Hua Chen Ing-Moi Hii Chih-Yen Chang
author2Str	Yu-Lin Li Yuag-Meng Liu Chun-Eng Liu Yu-Ren Cheng Chang-Hua Chen Ing-Moi Hii Chih-Yen Chang
ppnlink	478508638
callnumber-subject	QR - Microbiology
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008
callnumber-a	QR1-502
up_date	2024-07-03T13:35:29.134Z
_version_	1803565116045656064
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ037697358</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308012518.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ037697358</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QR1-502</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hsien-Meng Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: A cohort study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background/Purpose: Recurrent cellulitis is an important clinical issue but the optimal strategy for prophylaxis is not determined. Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval had been adopted in our hospital and the study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy. Methods: From January 1, 2009 to May 31, 2013, all patients aged ≥ 18 year, with a history of recurrent cellulitis and having received at least three shots of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis were retrospectively recruited for analysis. Two treatment periods (prophylaxis period and nonprophylaxis period) were defined. The effects of benzathine penicillin prophylaxis and patient characteristics on the incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis were analyzed using Poisson regression model. Results: A total of 72 patients were enrolled, including 26 (36.1%) men. The most common underlying conditions were past surgery at the proximal side of the affected limb (38, 52.8%), malignancy (31, 43.1%), and diabetes mellitus (24, 33.3%). The incidence rate of recurrent cellulitis in the prophylaxis period was 0.73 episode/patient-year, significantly lower than that of 1.25 episodes/patient-year in the nonprophylaxis period (p < 0.001). Tinea pedis was a significant factor associated with increasing incidence of recurrent cellulitis in our cohort. Conclusion: Intramuscular benzathine penicillin at a 4-week interval may be an effective prophylactic strategy to reduce the incidence of cellulitis. Further studies are necessary to determine the factors associated with failure of prophylaxis as well as optimal individualized dosage and dosing interval of the prophylactic agent.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cellulitis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">penicillin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">prophylaxis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Microbiology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yu-Lin Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yuag-Meng Liu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chun-Eng Liu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yu-Ren Cheng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chang-Hua Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ing-Moi Hii</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chih-Yen Chang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">50(2017), 5, Seite 613-618</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)478508638</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2175858-X</subfield><subfield code="x">16841182</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:50</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:613-618</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.008</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/33418389bbdd42a2a431ec9a70a1815c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118215008312</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1684-1182</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">50</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">613-618</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401582

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

The experience of intramuscular benzathine penicillin for prophylaxis of recurrent cellulitis: A cohort study

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?