Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis

To investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, and complications of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using three different approaches for acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods: A total of 106 patients with acute DVT were enrolled in this study. Forty-one patients received C...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Peng-Fei Duan [verfasserIn] Cai-Fang Ni [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2016

Schlagwörter:	catheter-directed thrombolysis saphenous vein stents venous thrombosis

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association - Elsevier, 2017, 115(2016), 8, Seite 652-657
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:115 ; year:2016 ; number:8 ; pages:652-657

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ037782371

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ037782371
003	DE-627
005	20230308013202.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ037782371
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJb9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a R5-920
100	0		\|a Peng-Fei Duan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis
264		1	\|c 2016
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a To investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, and complications of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using three different approaches for acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods: A total of 106 patients with acute DVT were enrolled in this study. Forty-one patients received CDT through the small saphenous vein (Group A), 35 through the great saphenous vein (Group B), and 30 through the popliteal vein (Group C). Iliac vein balloon dilation and stenting was performed in 65 cases. Results: The vascular approach route was not statistically related to limb edema reduction rates (Groups A, B, and C: 82.3 ± 7.6% vs. 81.6 ± 6.0% vs. 83.9 ± 6.1%), nor to thrombolysis rates (63.5 ± 7.7% vs. 66.9 ± 8.4% vs. 66.1 ± 2.7%). The procedure was significantly shorter for Groups B and C. No significant difference was found between Groups B and C. Most complications occurred in Group A. The complication rate in Group B was the lowest. Eighty-eight patients were followed up for 7–24 months. Of these, 78 were pain-free and without limb edema; six showed rethrombosis. Conclusion: CDT is an effective method to manage acute DVT. Of the three routes tested, the small saphenous vein route was associated with more frequent complications. Great saphenous vein catheterization was more effective because of its lower complication rate.
650		4	\|a catheter-directed thrombolysis
650		4	\|a saphenous vein
650		4	\|a stents
650		4	\|a venous thrombosis
653		0	\|a Medicine (General)
700	0		\|a Cai-Fang Ni \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Journal of the Formosan Medical Association \|d Elsevier, 2017 \|g 115(2016), 8, Seite 652-657 \|w (DE-627)517812649 \|w (DE-600)2250901-X \|x 09296646 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:115 \|g year:2016 \|g number:8 \|g pages:652-657
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/b9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664615002375 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/0929-6646 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 115 \|j 2016 \|e 8 \|h 652-657

Indexfelder

author_variant	p f d pfd c f n cfn
matchkey_str	article:09296646:2016----::admzdtdodfeetprahsocteedrcetrmoyifroeete
hierarchy_sort_str	2016
callnumber-subject-code	R
publishDate	2016
allfields	10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001 doi (DE-627)DOAJ037782371 (DE-599)DOAJb9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Peng-Fei Duan verfasserin aut Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, and complications of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using three different approaches for acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods: A total of 106 patients with acute DVT were enrolled in this study. Forty-one patients received CDT through the small saphenous vein (Group A), 35 through the great saphenous vein (Group B), and 30 through the popliteal vein (Group C). Iliac vein balloon dilation and stenting was performed in 65 cases. Results: The vascular approach route was not statistically related to limb edema reduction rates (Groups A, B, and C: 82.3 ± 7.6% vs. 81.6 ± 6.0% vs. 83.9 ± 6.1%), nor to thrombolysis rates (63.5 ± 7.7% vs. 66.9 ± 8.4% vs. 66.1 ± 2.7%). The procedure was significantly shorter for Groups B and C. No significant difference was found between Groups B and C. Most complications occurred in Group A. The complication rate in Group B was the lowest. Eighty-eight patients were followed up for 7–24 months. Of these, 78 were pain-free and without limb edema; six showed rethrombosis. Conclusion: CDT is an effective method to manage acute DVT. Of the three routes tested, the small saphenous vein route was associated with more frequent complications. Great saphenous vein catheterization was more effective because of its lower complication rate. catheter-directed thrombolysis saphenous vein stents venous thrombosis Medicine (General) Cai-Fang Ni verfasserin aut In Journal of the Formosan Medical Association Elsevier, 2017 115(2016), 8, Seite 652-657 (DE-627)517812649 (DE-600)2250901-X 09296646 nnns volume:115 year:2016 number:8 pages:652-657 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664615002375 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0929-6646 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 115 2016 8 652-657
spelling	10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001 doi (DE-627)DOAJ037782371 (DE-599)DOAJb9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Peng-Fei Duan verfasserin aut Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, and complications of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using three different approaches for acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods: A total of 106 patients with acute DVT were enrolled in this study. Forty-one patients received CDT through the small saphenous vein (Group A), 35 through the great saphenous vein (Group B), and 30 through the popliteal vein (Group C). Iliac vein balloon dilation and stenting was performed in 65 cases. Results: The vascular approach route was not statistically related to limb edema reduction rates (Groups A, B, and C: 82.3 ± 7.6% vs. 81.6 ± 6.0% vs. 83.9 ± 6.1%), nor to thrombolysis rates (63.5 ± 7.7% vs. 66.9 ± 8.4% vs. 66.1 ± 2.7%). The procedure was significantly shorter for Groups B and C. No significant difference was found between Groups B and C. Most complications occurred in Group A. The complication rate in Group B was the lowest. Eighty-eight patients were followed up for 7–24 months. Of these, 78 were pain-free and without limb edema; six showed rethrombosis. Conclusion: CDT is an effective method to manage acute DVT. Of the three routes tested, the small saphenous vein route was associated with more frequent complications. Great saphenous vein catheterization was more effective because of its lower complication rate. catheter-directed thrombolysis saphenous vein stents venous thrombosis Medicine (General) Cai-Fang Ni verfasserin aut In Journal of the Formosan Medical Association Elsevier, 2017 115(2016), 8, Seite 652-657 (DE-627)517812649 (DE-600)2250901-X 09296646 nnns volume:115 year:2016 number:8 pages:652-657 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664615002375 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0929-6646 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 115 2016 8 652-657
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001 doi (DE-627)DOAJ037782371 (DE-599)DOAJb9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Peng-Fei Duan verfasserin aut Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, and complications of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using three different approaches for acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods: A total of 106 patients with acute DVT were enrolled in this study. Forty-one patients received CDT through the small saphenous vein (Group A), 35 through the great saphenous vein (Group B), and 30 through the popliteal vein (Group C). Iliac vein balloon dilation and stenting was performed in 65 cases. Results: The vascular approach route was not statistically related to limb edema reduction rates (Groups A, B, and C: 82.3 ± 7.6% vs. 81.6 ± 6.0% vs. 83.9 ± 6.1%), nor to thrombolysis rates (63.5 ± 7.7% vs. 66.9 ± 8.4% vs. 66.1 ± 2.7%). The procedure was significantly shorter for Groups B and C. No significant difference was found between Groups B and C. Most complications occurred in Group A. The complication rate in Group B was the lowest. Eighty-eight patients were followed up for 7–24 months. Of these, 78 were pain-free and without limb edema; six showed rethrombosis. Conclusion: CDT is an effective method to manage acute DVT. Of the three routes tested, the small saphenous vein route was associated with more frequent complications. Great saphenous vein catheterization was more effective because of its lower complication rate. catheter-directed thrombolysis saphenous vein stents venous thrombosis Medicine (General) Cai-Fang Ni verfasserin aut In Journal of the Formosan Medical Association Elsevier, 2017 115(2016), 8, Seite 652-657 (DE-627)517812649 (DE-600)2250901-X 09296646 nnns volume:115 year:2016 number:8 pages:652-657 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664615002375 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0929-6646 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 115 2016 8 652-657
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001 doi (DE-627)DOAJ037782371 (DE-599)DOAJb9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Peng-Fei Duan verfasserin aut Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, and complications of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using three different approaches for acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods: A total of 106 patients with acute DVT were enrolled in this study. Forty-one patients received CDT through the small saphenous vein (Group A), 35 through the great saphenous vein (Group B), and 30 through the popliteal vein (Group C). Iliac vein balloon dilation and stenting was performed in 65 cases. Results: The vascular approach route was not statistically related to limb edema reduction rates (Groups A, B, and C: 82.3 ± 7.6% vs. 81.6 ± 6.0% vs. 83.9 ± 6.1%), nor to thrombolysis rates (63.5 ± 7.7% vs. 66.9 ± 8.4% vs. 66.1 ± 2.7%). The procedure was significantly shorter for Groups B and C. No significant difference was found between Groups B and C. Most complications occurred in Group A. The complication rate in Group B was the lowest. Eighty-eight patients were followed up for 7–24 months. Of these, 78 were pain-free and without limb edema; six showed rethrombosis. Conclusion: CDT is an effective method to manage acute DVT. Of the three routes tested, the small saphenous vein route was associated with more frequent complications. Great saphenous vein catheterization was more effective because of its lower complication rate. catheter-directed thrombolysis saphenous vein stents venous thrombosis Medicine (General) Cai-Fang Ni verfasserin aut In Journal of the Formosan Medical Association Elsevier, 2017 115(2016), 8, Seite 652-657 (DE-627)517812649 (DE-600)2250901-X 09296646 nnns volume:115 year:2016 number:8 pages:652-657 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664615002375 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0929-6646 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 115 2016 8 652-657
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001 doi (DE-627)DOAJ037782371 (DE-599)DOAJb9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Peng-Fei Duan verfasserin aut Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, and complications of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using three different approaches for acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods: A total of 106 patients with acute DVT were enrolled in this study. Forty-one patients received CDT through the small saphenous vein (Group A), 35 through the great saphenous vein (Group B), and 30 through the popliteal vein (Group C). Iliac vein balloon dilation and stenting was performed in 65 cases. Results: The vascular approach route was not statistically related to limb edema reduction rates (Groups A, B, and C: 82.3 ± 7.6% vs. 81.6 ± 6.0% vs. 83.9 ± 6.1%), nor to thrombolysis rates (63.5 ± 7.7% vs. 66.9 ± 8.4% vs. 66.1 ± 2.7%). The procedure was significantly shorter for Groups B and C. No significant difference was found between Groups B and C. Most complications occurred in Group A. The complication rate in Group B was the lowest. Eighty-eight patients were followed up for 7–24 months. Of these, 78 were pain-free and without limb edema; six showed rethrombosis. Conclusion: CDT is an effective method to manage acute DVT. Of the three routes tested, the small saphenous vein route was associated with more frequent complications. Great saphenous vein catheterization was more effective because of its lower complication rate. catheter-directed thrombolysis saphenous vein stents venous thrombosis Medicine (General) Cai-Fang Ni verfasserin aut In Journal of the Formosan Medical Association Elsevier, 2017 115(2016), 8, Seite 652-657 (DE-627)517812649 (DE-600)2250901-X 09296646 nnns volume:115 year:2016 number:8 pages:652-657 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664615002375 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0929-6646 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 115 2016 8 652-657
language	English
source	In Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 115(2016), 8, Seite 652-657 volume:115 year:2016 number:8 pages:652-657
sourceStr	In Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 115(2016), 8, Seite 652-657 volume:115 year:2016 number:8 pages:652-657
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	catheter-directed thrombolysis saphenous vein stents venous thrombosis Medicine (General)
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Peng-Fei Duan @@aut@@ Cai-Fang Ni @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	517812649
id	DOAJ037782371
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ037782371</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308013202.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ037782371</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R5-920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peng-Fei Duan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, and complications of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using three different approaches for acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods: A total of 106 patients with acute DVT were enrolled in this study. Forty-one patients received CDT through the small saphenous vein (Group A), 35 through the great saphenous vein (Group B), and 30 through the popliteal vein (Group C). Iliac vein balloon dilation and stenting was performed in 65 cases. Results: The vascular approach route was not statistically related to limb edema reduction rates (Groups A, B, and C: 82.3 ± 7.6% vs. 81.6 ± 6.0% vs. 83.9 ± 6.1%), nor to thrombolysis rates (63.5 ± 7.7% vs. 66.9 ± 8.4% vs. 66.1 ± 2.7%). The procedure was significantly shorter for Groups B and C. No significant difference was found between Groups B and C. Most complications occurred in Group A. The complication rate in Group B was the lowest. Eighty-eight patients were followed up for 7–24 months. Of these, 78 were pain-free and without limb edema; six showed rethrombosis. Conclusion: CDT is an effective method to manage acute DVT. Of the three routes tested, the small saphenous vein route was associated with more frequent complications. Great saphenous vein catheterization was more effective because of its lower complication rate.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">catheter-directed thrombolysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">saphenous vein</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">stents</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">venous thrombosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cai-Fang Ni</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of the Formosan Medical Association</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">115(2016), 8, Seite 652-657</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)517812649</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2250901-X</subfield><subfield code="x">09296646</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:115</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:8</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:652-657</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664615002375</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0929-6646</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">115</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">8</subfield><subfield code="h">652-657</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Peng-Fei Duan
spellingShingle	Peng-Fei Duan misc R5-920 misc catheter-directed thrombolysis misc saphenous vein misc stents misc venous thrombosis misc Medicine (General) Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis
authorStr	Peng-Fei Duan
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)517812649
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	R5-920
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	09296646
topic_title	R5-920 Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis catheter-directed thrombolysis saphenous vein stents venous thrombosis
topic	misc R5-920 misc catheter-directed thrombolysis misc saphenous vein misc stents misc venous thrombosis misc Medicine (General)
topic_unstemmed	misc R5-920 misc catheter-directed thrombolysis misc saphenous vein misc stents misc venous thrombosis misc Medicine (General)
topic_browse	misc R5-920 misc catheter-directed thrombolysis misc saphenous vein misc stents misc venous thrombosis misc Medicine (General)
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
hierarchy_parent_id	517812649
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)517812649 (DE-600)2250901-X
title	Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ037782371 (DE-599)DOAJb9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298
title_full	Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis
author_sort	Peng-Fei Duan
journal	Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
journalStr	Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2016
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	652
author_browse	Peng-Fei Duan Cai-Fang Ni
container_volume	115
class	R5-920
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Peng-Fei Duan
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis
callnumber	R5-920
title_auth	Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis
abstract	To investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, and complications of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using three different approaches for acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods: A total of 106 patients with acute DVT were enrolled in this study. Forty-one patients received CDT through the small saphenous vein (Group A), 35 through the great saphenous vein (Group B), and 30 through the popliteal vein (Group C). Iliac vein balloon dilation and stenting was performed in 65 cases. Results: The vascular approach route was not statistically related to limb edema reduction rates (Groups A, B, and C: 82.3 ± 7.6% vs. 81.6 ± 6.0% vs. 83.9 ± 6.1%), nor to thrombolysis rates (63.5 ± 7.7% vs. 66.9 ± 8.4% vs. 66.1 ± 2.7%). The procedure was significantly shorter for Groups B and C. No significant difference was found between Groups B and C. Most complications occurred in Group A. The complication rate in Group B was the lowest. Eighty-eight patients were followed up for 7–24 months. Of these, 78 were pain-free and without limb edema; six showed rethrombosis. Conclusion: CDT is an effective method to manage acute DVT. Of the three routes tested, the small saphenous vein route was associated with more frequent complications. Great saphenous vein catheterization was more effective because of its lower complication rate.
abstractGer	To investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, and complications of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using three different approaches for acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods: A total of 106 patients with acute DVT were enrolled in this study. Forty-one patients received CDT through the small saphenous vein (Group A), 35 through the great saphenous vein (Group B), and 30 through the popliteal vein (Group C). Iliac vein balloon dilation and stenting was performed in 65 cases. Results: The vascular approach route was not statistically related to limb edema reduction rates (Groups A, B, and C: 82.3 ± 7.6% vs. 81.6 ± 6.0% vs. 83.9 ± 6.1%), nor to thrombolysis rates (63.5 ± 7.7% vs. 66.9 ± 8.4% vs. 66.1 ± 2.7%). The procedure was significantly shorter for Groups B and C. No significant difference was found between Groups B and C. Most complications occurred in Group A. The complication rate in Group B was the lowest. Eighty-eight patients were followed up for 7–24 months. Of these, 78 were pain-free and without limb edema; six showed rethrombosis. Conclusion: CDT is an effective method to manage acute DVT. Of the three routes tested, the small saphenous vein route was associated with more frequent complications. Great saphenous vein catheterization was more effective because of its lower complication rate.
abstract_unstemmed	To investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, and complications of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using three different approaches for acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods: A total of 106 patients with acute DVT were enrolled in this study. Forty-one patients received CDT through the small saphenous vein (Group A), 35 through the great saphenous vein (Group B), and 30 through the popliteal vein (Group C). Iliac vein balloon dilation and stenting was performed in 65 cases. Results: The vascular approach route was not statistically related to limb edema reduction rates (Groups A, B, and C: 82.3 ± 7.6% vs. 81.6 ± 6.0% vs. 83.9 ± 6.1%), nor to thrombolysis rates (63.5 ± 7.7% vs. 66.9 ± 8.4% vs. 66.1 ± 2.7%). The procedure was significantly shorter for Groups B and C. No significant difference was found between Groups B and C. Most complications occurred in Group A. The complication rate in Group B was the lowest. Eighty-eight patients were followed up for 7–24 months. Of these, 78 were pain-free and without limb edema; six showed rethrombosis. Conclusion: CDT is an effective method to manage acute DVT. Of the three routes tested, the small saphenous vein route was associated with more frequent complications. Great saphenous vein catheterization was more effective because of its lower complication rate.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	8
title_short	Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis
url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001 https://doaj.org/article/b9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664615002375 https://doaj.org/toc/0929-6646
remote_bool	true
author2	Cai-Fang Ni
author2Str	Cai-Fang Ni
ppnlink	517812649
callnumber-subject	R - General Medicine
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001
callnumber-a	R5-920
up_date	2024-07-03T14:05:39.796Z
_version_	1803567014662373376
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ037782371</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308013202.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ037782371</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R5-920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peng-Fei Duan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, and complications of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using three different approaches for acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods: A total of 106 patients with acute DVT were enrolled in this study. Forty-one patients received CDT through the small saphenous vein (Group A), 35 through the great saphenous vein (Group B), and 30 through the popliteal vein (Group C). Iliac vein balloon dilation and stenting was performed in 65 cases. Results: The vascular approach route was not statistically related to limb edema reduction rates (Groups A, B, and C: 82.3 ± 7.6% vs. 81.6 ± 6.0% vs. 83.9 ± 6.1%), nor to thrombolysis rates (63.5 ± 7.7% vs. 66.9 ± 8.4% vs. 66.1 ± 2.7%). The procedure was significantly shorter for Groups B and C. No significant difference was found between Groups B and C. Most complications occurred in Group A. The complication rate in Group B was the lowest. Eighty-eight patients were followed up for 7–24 months. Of these, 78 were pain-free and without limb edema; six showed rethrombosis. Conclusion: CDT is an effective method to manage acute DVT. Of the three routes tested, the small saphenous vein route was associated with more frequent complications. Great saphenous vein catheterization was more effective because of its lower complication rate.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">catheter-directed thrombolysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">saphenous vein</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">stents</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">venous thrombosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cai-Fang Ni</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of the Formosan Medical Association</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">115(2016), 8, Seite 652-657</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)517812649</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2250901-X</subfield><subfield code="x">09296646</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:115</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:8</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:652-657</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2015.07.001</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b9efc377d8a04da592939a25d04e5298</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664615002375</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0929-6646</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">115</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">8</subfield><subfield code="h">652-657</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3985004

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?