Serbs in Croatia (1918-1929): Between the myth of “Greater-Serbian Hegemony” and social reality
The situation of the Serbian community in Croatia in the years following the 1918 unification has been analyzed in order to test whether the clichéd view of Croatia and Croats as having been endangered and exploited had any impact on the status of the Serbian community and, if it did, in what way...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Božić Sofija [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch ; Französisch |
Erschienen: |
2010 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Balcanica - Institute for Balkan Studies SASA, 2017, (2010), 41, Seite 185-208 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2010 ; number:41 ; pages:185-208 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.2298/BALC1041185B |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ03803316X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ03803316X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230308014907.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230227s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.2298/BALC1041185B |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ03803316X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng |a fre | ||
050 | 0 | |a DR1-2285 | |
100 | 0 | |a Božić Sofija |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Serbs in Croatia (1918-1929): Between the myth of “Greater-Serbian Hegemony” and social reality |
264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The situation of the Serbian community in Croatia in the years following the 1918 unification has been analyzed in order to test whether the clichéd view of Croatia and Croats as having been endangered and exploited had any impact on the status of the Serbian community and, if it did, in what way. Although the topic is far from being exhausted in this contribution, the examples given suggest that the two nations in Croatia were deeply divided. The sources studied cast quite a different light on the thesis that Croats were “oppressed” by Serbs, a thesis that has for quite a long time been passing as a valid historical interpretation in historiography. These sources suggest that the perception of Serbs as hegemony-minded resulted from propaganda rather than from the actual state of affairs. Besides, they show that the Serbs - systematically portrayed to the Croatian public as invaders and enslavers, while, by contrast, they saw themselves as being “third-rate citizens” - lived their daily lives under strain, surrounded by intolerance, subjected to various forms of pressure and violence, often fearing for their livelihoods, even for their lives. The inexorable logic of facts leads to the conclusion that members of the Serbian community in Croatia felt discriminated against and not quite safe. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Kingdom of SCS/Yugoslavia | |
650 | 4 | |a Serbs | |
650 | 4 | |a Croatia | |
650 | 4 | |a ethnic relations | |
650 | 4 | |a political ideologies | |
650 | 4 | |a society | |
653 | 0 | |a History of Balkan Peninsula | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Balcanica |d Institute for Balkan Studies SASA, 2017 |g (2010), 41, Seite 185-208 |w (DE-627)518344657 |w (DE-600)2252284-0 |x 24060801 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2010 |g number:41 |g pages:185-208 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2298/BALC1041185B |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-7653/2010/0350-76531041185B.pdf |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0350-7653 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_374 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2863 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4392 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |j 2010 |e 41 |h 185-208 |
author_variant |
b s bs |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:24060801:2010----::ebicota9899eweteyhfraesrinee |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2010 |
callnumber-subject-code |
DR |
publishDate |
2010 |
allfields |
10.2298/BALC1041185B doi (DE-627)DOAJ03803316X (DE-599)DOAJ8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre DR1-2285 Božić Sofija verfasserin aut Serbs in Croatia (1918-1929): Between the myth of “Greater-Serbian Hegemony” and social reality 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The situation of the Serbian community in Croatia in the years following the 1918 unification has been analyzed in order to test whether the clichéd view of Croatia and Croats as having been endangered and exploited had any impact on the status of the Serbian community and, if it did, in what way. Although the topic is far from being exhausted in this contribution, the examples given suggest that the two nations in Croatia were deeply divided. The sources studied cast quite a different light on the thesis that Croats were “oppressed” by Serbs, a thesis that has for quite a long time been passing as a valid historical interpretation in historiography. These sources suggest that the perception of Serbs as hegemony-minded resulted from propaganda rather than from the actual state of affairs. Besides, they show that the Serbs - systematically portrayed to the Croatian public as invaders and enslavers, while, by contrast, they saw themselves as being “third-rate citizens” - lived their daily lives under strain, surrounded by intolerance, subjected to various forms of pressure and violence, often fearing for their livelihoods, even for their lives. The inexorable logic of facts leads to the conclusion that members of the Serbian community in Croatia felt discriminated against and not quite safe. Kingdom of SCS/Yugoslavia Serbs Croatia ethnic relations political ideologies society History of Balkan Peninsula In Balcanica Institute for Balkan Studies SASA, 2017 (2010), 41, Seite 185-208 (DE-627)518344657 (DE-600)2252284-0 24060801 nnns year:2010 number:41 pages:185-208 https://doi.org/10.2298/BALC1041185B kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105 kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-7653/2010/0350-76531041185B.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0350-7653 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2010 41 185-208 |
spelling |
10.2298/BALC1041185B doi (DE-627)DOAJ03803316X (DE-599)DOAJ8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre DR1-2285 Božić Sofija verfasserin aut Serbs in Croatia (1918-1929): Between the myth of “Greater-Serbian Hegemony” and social reality 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The situation of the Serbian community in Croatia in the years following the 1918 unification has been analyzed in order to test whether the clichéd view of Croatia and Croats as having been endangered and exploited had any impact on the status of the Serbian community and, if it did, in what way. Although the topic is far from being exhausted in this contribution, the examples given suggest that the two nations in Croatia were deeply divided. The sources studied cast quite a different light on the thesis that Croats were “oppressed” by Serbs, a thesis that has for quite a long time been passing as a valid historical interpretation in historiography. These sources suggest that the perception of Serbs as hegemony-minded resulted from propaganda rather than from the actual state of affairs. Besides, they show that the Serbs - systematically portrayed to the Croatian public as invaders and enslavers, while, by contrast, they saw themselves as being “third-rate citizens” - lived their daily lives under strain, surrounded by intolerance, subjected to various forms of pressure and violence, often fearing for their livelihoods, even for their lives. The inexorable logic of facts leads to the conclusion that members of the Serbian community in Croatia felt discriminated against and not quite safe. Kingdom of SCS/Yugoslavia Serbs Croatia ethnic relations political ideologies society History of Balkan Peninsula In Balcanica Institute for Balkan Studies SASA, 2017 (2010), 41, Seite 185-208 (DE-627)518344657 (DE-600)2252284-0 24060801 nnns year:2010 number:41 pages:185-208 https://doi.org/10.2298/BALC1041185B kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105 kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-7653/2010/0350-76531041185B.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0350-7653 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2010 41 185-208 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.2298/BALC1041185B doi (DE-627)DOAJ03803316X (DE-599)DOAJ8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre DR1-2285 Božić Sofija verfasserin aut Serbs in Croatia (1918-1929): Between the myth of “Greater-Serbian Hegemony” and social reality 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The situation of the Serbian community in Croatia in the years following the 1918 unification has been analyzed in order to test whether the clichéd view of Croatia and Croats as having been endangered and exploited had any impact on the status of the Serbian community and, if it did, in what way. Although the topic is far from being exhausted in this contribution, the examples given suggest that the two nations in Croatia were deeply divided. The sources studied cast quite a different light on the thesis that Croats were “oppressed” by Serbs, a thesis that has for quite a long time been passing as a valid historical interpretation in historiography. These sources suggest that the perception of Serbs as hegemony-minded resulted from propaganda rather than from the actual state of affairs. Besides, they show that the Serbs - systematically portrayed to the Croatian public as invaders and enslavers, while, by contrast, they saw themselves as being “third-rate citizens” - lived their daily lives under strain, surrounded by intolerance, subjected to various forms of pressure and violence, often fearing for their livelihoods, even for their lives. The inexorable logic of facts leads to the conclusion that members of the Serbian community in Croatia felt discriminated against and not quite safe. Kingdom of SCS/Yugoslavia Serbs Croatia ethnic relations political ideologies society History of Balkan Peninsula In Balcanica Institute for Balkan Studies SASA, 2017 (2010), 41, Seite 185-208 (DE-627)518344657 (DE-600)2252284-0 24060801 nnns year:2010 number:41 pages:185-208 https://doi.org/10.2298/BALC1041185B kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105 kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-7653/2010/0350-76531041185B.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0350-7653 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2010 41 185-208 |
allfieldsGer |
10.2298/BALC1041185B doi (DE-627)DOAJ03803316X (DE-599)DOAJ8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre DR1-2285 Božić Sofija verfasserin aut Serbs in Croatia (1918-1929): Between the myth of “Greater-Serbian Hegemony” and social reality 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The situation of the Serbian community in Croatia in the years following the 1918 unification has been analyzed in order to test whether the clichéd view of Croatia and Croats as having been endangered and exploited had any impact on the status of the Serbian community and, if it did, in what way. Although the topic is far from being exhausted in this contribution, the examples given suggest that the two nations in Croatia were deeply divided. The sources studied cast quite a different light on the thesis that Croats were “oppressed” by Serbs, a thesis that has for quite a long time been passing as a valid historical interpretation in historiography. These sources suggest that the perception of Serbs as hegemony-minded resulted from propaganda rather than from the actual state of affairs. Besides, they show that the Serbs - systematically portrayed to the Croatian public as invaders and enslavers, while, by contrast, they saw themselves as being “third-rate citizens” - lived their daily lives under strain, surrounded by intolerance, subjected to various forms of pressure and violence, often fearing for their livelihoods, even for their lives. The inexorable logic of facts leads to the conclusion that members of the Serbian community in Croatia felt discriminated against and not quite safe. Kingdom of SCS/Yugoslavia Serbs Croatia ethnic relations political ideologies society History of Balkan Peninsula In Balcanica Institute for Balkan Studies SASA, 2017 (2010), 41, Seite 185-208 (DE-627)518344657 (DE-600)2252284-0 24060801 nnns year:2010 number:41 pages:185-208 https://doi.org/10.2298/BALC1041185B kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105 kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-7653/2010/0350-76531041185B.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0350-7653 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2010 41 185-208 |
allfieldsSound |
10.2298/BALC1041185B doi (DE-627)DOAJ03803316X (DE-599)DOAJ8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre DR1-2285 Božić Sofija verfasserin aut Serbs in Croatia (1918-1929): Between the myth of “Greater-Serbian Hegemony” and social reality 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The situation of the Serbian community in Croatia in the years following the 1918 unification has been analyzed in order to test whether the clichéd view of Croatia and Croats as having been endangered and exploited had any impact on the status of the Serbian community and, if it did, in what way. Although the topic is far from being exhausted in this contribution, the examples given suggest that the two nations in Croatia were deeply divided. The sources studied cast quite a different light on the thesis that Croats were “oppressed” by Serbs, a thesis that has for quite a long time been passing as a valid historical interpretation in historiography. These sources suggest that the perception of Serbs as hegemony-minded resulted from propaganda rather than from the actual state of affairs. Besides, they show that the Serbs - systematically portrayed to the Croatian public as invaders and enslavers, while, by contrast, they saw themselves as being “third-rate citizens” - lived their daily lives under strain, surrounded by intolerance, subjected to various forms of pressure and violence, often fearing for their livelihoods, even for their lives. The inexorable logic of facts leads to the conclusion that members of the Serbian community in Croatia felt discriminated against and not quite safe. Kingdom of SCS/Yugoslavia Serbs Croatia ethnic relations political ideologies society History of Balkan Peninsula In Balcanica Institute for Balkan Studies SASA, 2017 (2010), 41, Seite 185-208 (DE-627)518344657 (DE-600)2252284-0 24060801 nnns year:2010 number:41 pages:185-208 https://doi.org/10.2298/BALC1041185B kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105 kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-7653/2010/0350-76531041185B.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0350-7653 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2010 41 185-208 |
language |
English French |
source |
In Balcanica (2010), 41, Seite 185-208 year:2010 number:41 pages:185-208 |
sourceStr |
In Balcanica (2010), 41, Seite 185-208 year:2010 number:41 pages:185-208 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Kingdom of SCS/Yugoslavia Serbs Croatia ethnic relations political ideologies society History of Balkan Peninsula |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Balcanica |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Božić Sofija @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2010-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
518344657 |
id |
DOAJ03803316X |
language_de |
englisch franzoesisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ03803316X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308014907.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.2298/BALC1041185B</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ03803316X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">DR1-2285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Božić Sofija</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Serbs in Croatia (1918-1929): Between the myth of “Greater-Serbian Hegemony” and social reality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The situation of the Serbian community in Croatia in the years following the 1918 unification has been analyzed in order to test whether the clichéd view of Croatia and Croats as having been endangered and exploited had any impact on the status of the Serbian community and, if it did, in what way. Although the topic is far from being exhausted in this contribution, the examples given suggest that the two nations in Croatia were deeply divided. The sources studied cast quite a different light on the thesis that Croats were “oppressed” by Serbs, a thesis that has for quite a long time been passing as a valid historical interpretation in historiography. These sources suggest that the perception of Serbs as hegemony-minded resulted from propaganda rather than from the actual state of affairs. Besides, they show that the Serbs - systematically portrayed to the Croatian public as invaders and enslavers, while, by contrast, they saw themselves as being “third-rate citizens” - lived their daily lives under strain, surrounded by intolerance, subjected to various forms of pressure and violence, often fearing for their livelihoods, even for their lives. The inexorable logic of facts leads to the conclusion that members of the Serbian community in Croatia felt discriminated against and not quite safe.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kingdom of SCS/Yugoslavia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Serbs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Croatia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ethnic relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">political ideologies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">society</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">History of Balkan Peninsula</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Balcanica</subfield><subfield code="d">Institute for Balkan Studies SASA, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">(2010), 41, Seite 185-208</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)518344657</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2252284-0</subfield><subfield code="x">24060801</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:41</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:185-208</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2298/BALC1041185B</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-7653/2010/0350-76531041185B.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0350-7653</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">41</subfield><subfield code="h">185-208</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
D - World History |
author |
Božić Sofija |
spellingShingle |
Božić Sofija misc DR1-2285 misc Kingdom of SCS/Yugoslavia misc Serbs misc Croatia misc ethnic relations misc political ideologies misc society misc History of Balkan Peninsula Serbs in Croatia (1918-1929): Between the myth of “Greater-Serbian Hegemony” and social reality |
authorStr |
Božić Sofija |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)518344657 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
DR1-2285 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
24060801 |
topic_title |
DR1-2285 Serbs in Croatia (1918-1929): Between the myth of “Greater-Serbian Hegemony” and social reality Kingdom of SCS/Yugoslavia Serbs Croatia ethnic relations political ideologies society |
topic |
misc DR1-2285 misc Kingdom of SCS/Yugoslavia misc Serbs misc Croatia misc ethnic relations misc political ideologies misc society misc History of Balkan Peninsula |
topic_unstemmed |
misc DR1-2285 misc Kingdom of SCS/Yugoslavia misc Serbs misc Croatia misc ethnic relations misc political ideologies misc society misc History of Balkan Peninsula |
topic_browse |
misc DR1-2285 misc Kingdom of SCS/Yugoslavia misc Serbs misc Croatia misc ethnic relations misc political ideologies misc society misc History of Balkan Peninsula |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Balcanica |
hierarchy_parent_id |
518344657 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Balcanica |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)518344657 (DE-600)2252284-0 |
title |
Serbs in Croatia (1918-1929): Between the myth of “Greater-Serbian Hegemony” and social reality |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ03803316X (DE-599)DOAJ8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105 |
title_full |
Serbs in Croatia (1918-1929): Between the myth of “Greater-Serbian Hegemony” and social reality |
author_sort |
Božić Sofija |
journal |
Balcanica |
journalStr |
Balcanica |
callnumber-first-code |
D |
lang_code |
eng fre |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2010 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
185 |
author_browse |
Božić Sofija |
class |
DR1-2285 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Božić Sofija |
doi_str_mv |
10.2298/BALC1041185B |
title_sort |
serbs in croatia (1918-1929): between the myth of “greater-serbian hegemony” and social reality |
callnumber |
DR1-2285 |
title_auth |
Serbs in Croatia (1918-1929): Between the myth of “Greater-Serbian Hegemony” and social reality |
abstract |
The situation of the Serbian community in Croatia in the years following the 1918 unification has been analyzed in order to test whether the clichéd view of Croatia and Croats as having been endangered and exploited had any impact on the status of the Serbian community and, if it did, in what way. Although the topic is far from being exhausted in this contribution, the examples given suggest that the two nations in Croatia were deeply divided. The sources studied cast quite a different light on the thesis that Croats were “oppressed” by Serbs, a thesis that has for quite a long time been passing as a valid historical interpretation in historiography. These sources suggest that the perception of Serbs as hegemony-minded resulted from propaganda rather than from the actual state of affairs. Besides, they show that the Serbs - systematically portrayed to the Croatian public as invaders and enslavers, while, by contrast, they saw themselves as being “third-rate citizens” - lived their daily lives under strain, surrounded by intolerance, subjected to various forms of pressure and violence, often fearing for their livelihoods, even for their lives. The inexorable logic of facts leads to the conclusion that members of the Serbian community in Croatia felt discriminated against and not quite safe. |
abstractGer |
The situation of the Serbian community in Croatia in the years following the 1918 unification has been analyzed in order to test whether the clichéd view of Croatia and Croats as having been endangered and exploited had any impact on the status of the Serbian community and, if it did, in what way. Although the topic is far from being exhausted in this contribution, the examples given suggest that the two nations in Croatia were deeply divided. The sources studied cast quite a different light on the thesis that Croats were “oppressed” by Serbs, a thesis that has for quite a long time been passing as a valid historical interpretation in historiography. These sources suggest that the perception of Serbs as hegemony-minded resulted from propaganda rather than from the actual state of affairs. Besides, they show that the Serbs - systematically portrayed to the Croatian public as invaders and enslavers, while, by contrast, they saw themselves as being “third-rate citizens” - lived their daily lives under strain, surrounded by intolerance, subjected to various forms of pressure and violence, often fearing for their livelihoods, even for their lives. The inexorable logic of facts leads to the conclusion that members of the Serbian community in Croatia felt discriminated against and not quite safe. |
abstract_unstemmed |
The situation of the Serbian community in Croatia in the years following the 1918 unification has been analyzed in order to test whether the clichéd view of Croatia and Croats as having been endangered and exploited had any impact on the status of the Serbian community and, if it did, in what way. Although the topic is far from being exhausted in this contribution, the examples given suggest that the two nations in Croatia were deeply divided. The sources studied cast quite a different light on the thesis that Croats were “oppressed” by Serbs, a thesis that has for quite a long time been passing as a valid historical interpretation in historiography. These sources suggest that the perception of Serbs as hegemony-minded resulted from propaganda rather than from the actual state of affairs. Besides, they show that the Serbs - systematically portrayed to the Croatian public as invaders and enslavers, while, by contrast, they saw themselves as being “third-rate citizens” - lived their daily lives under strain, surrounded by intolerance, subjected to various forms of pressure and violence, often fearing for their livelihoods, even for their lives. The inexorable logic of facts leads to the conclusion that members of the Serbian community in Croatia felt discriminated against and not quite safe. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
41 |
title_short |
Serbs in Croatia (1918-1929): Between the myth of “Greater-Serbian Hegemony” and social reality |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2298/BALC1041185B https://doaj.org/article/8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105 http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-7653/2010/0350-76531041185B.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/0350-7653 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
518344657 |
callnumber-subject |
DR - Balkan Peninsula |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.2298/BALC1041185B |
callnumber-a |
DR1-2285 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T15:36:54.948Z |
_version_ |
1803572755773259776 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ03803316X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308014907.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.2298/BALC1041185B</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ03803316X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">DR1-2285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Božić Sofija</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Serbs in Croatia (1918-1929): Between the myth of “Greater-Serbian Hegemony” and social reality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The situation of the Serbian community in Croatia in the years following the 1918 unification has been analyzed in order to test whether the clichéd view of Croatia and Croats as having been endangered and exploited had any impact on the status of the Serbian community and, if it did, in what way. Although the topic is far from being exhausted in this contribution, the examples given suggest that the two nations in Croatia were deeply divided. The sources studied cast quite a different light on the thesis that Croats were “oppressed” by Serbs, a thesis that has for quite a long time been passing as a valid historical interpretation in historiography. These sources suggest that the perception of Serbs as hegemony-minded resulted from propaganda rather than from the actual state of affairs. Besides, they show that the Serbs - systematically portrayed to the Croatian public as invaders and enslavers, while, by contrast, they saw themselves as being “third-rate citizens” - lived their daily lives under strain, surrounded by intolerance, subjected to various forms of pressure and violence, often fearing for their livelihoods, even for their lives. The inexorable logic of facts leads to the conclusion that members of the Serbian community in Croatia felt discriminated against and not quite safe.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kingdom of SCS/Yugoslavia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Serbs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Croatia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ethnic relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">political ideologies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">society</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">History of Balkan Peninsula</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Balcanica</subfield><subfield code="d">Institute for Balkan Studies SASA, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">(2010), 41, Seite 185-208</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)518344657</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2252284-0</subfield><subfield code="x">24060801</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:41</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:185-208</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2298/BALC1041185B</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8cc0ccf9ea854e6c98d00f4cffaa4105</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-7653/2010/0350-76531041185B.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0350-7653</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">41</subfield><subfield code="h">185-208</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399666 |