Pedeapsa cu moartea și problematica iertării păcatului sfidător deliberat
The current study tackles two issues. The first one is the issue of the need for understanding the problem of the inexpiable sin and the application of the death penalty within the OT Israel. The main interest has been the searching for the criteria upon which this penalty was applied. Consequently,...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Florin Iacob [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Spanisch ; Ungarisch ; Rumänisch |
| Erschienen: |
2013 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: TheoRhēma - Editura Universității Adventus, 2022, 8(2013), 1 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:8 ; year:2013 ; number:1 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ039309401 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ039309401 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230526111946.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ039309401 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJb279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a spa |a hun |a rum | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a BT10-1480 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Florin Iacob |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Pedeapsa cu moartea și problematica iertării păcatului sfidător deliberat |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The current study tackles two issues. The first one is the issue of the need for understanding the problem of the inexpiable sin and the application of the death penalty within the OT Israel. The main interest has been the searching for the criteria upon which this penalty was applied. Consequently, we have enquired into the way we could explain the differentiation between sins within the sin spectrum, considering different levels of guilt and moral responsibility, and then we have looked into the OT casuistry for some hints considering the application of the death penalty in the case of the defiant, inexpiable sin. The second issue of this paper is determined by the question regarding the far-reaching implications of the correct understanding of the first one for the field of applied theology: “Have I committed a sin too great for God to forgive?”, ”Am I too bad to be saved?” In the light of these questions one can understand why the stress upon the basis on which the types of sin have been differentiated according to the forgiveness and expiation wrought through OT Sanctuary services. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a inadvertent sin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a defiant sin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a death penalty | |
| 650 | 4 | |a expiable/inexpiable | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Doctrinal Theology | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t TheoRhēma |d Editura Universității Adventus, 2022 |g 8(2013), 1 |w (DE-627)DOAJ078622905 |x 27842665 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2013 |g number:1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/b279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://publications.uadventus.ro/index.php/thrh/article/view/55 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1842-0613 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2784-2665 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 8 |j 2013 |e 1 | ||
| author_variant |
f i fi |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:27842665:2013----::eepauoreirbeaiaetipauu |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2013 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
BT |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ039309401 (DE-599)DOAJb279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa hun rum BT10-1480 Florin Iacob verfasserin aut Pedeapsa cu moartea și problematica iertării păcatului sfidător deliberat 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The current study tackles two issues. The first one is the issue of the need for understanding the problem of the inexpiable sin and the application of the death penalty within the OT Israel. The main interest has been the searching for the criteria upon which this penalty was applied. Consequently, we have enquired into the way we could explain the differentiation between sins within the sin spectrum, considering different levels of guilt and moral responsibility, and then we have looked into the OT casuistry for some hints considering the application of the death penalty in the case of the defiant, inexpiable sin. The second issue of this paper is determined by the question regarding the far-reaching implications of the correct understanding of the first one for the field of applied theology: “Have I committed a sin too great for God to forgive?”, ”Am I too bad to be saved?” In the light of these questions one can understand why the stress upon the basis on which the types of sin have been differentiated according to the forgiveness and expiation wrought through OT Sanctuary services. inadvertent sin defiant sin death penalty expiable/inexpiable Doctrinal Theology In TheoRhēma Editura Universității Adventus, 2022 8(2013), 1 (DE-627)DOAJ078622905 27842665 nnns volume:8 year:2013 number:1 https://doaj.org/article/b279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792 kostenfrei https://publications.uadventus.ro/index.php/thrh/article/view/55 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1842-0613 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2784-2665 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 8 2013 1 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ039309401 (DE-599)DOAJb279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa hun rum BT10-1480 Florin Iacob verfasserin aut Pedeapsa cu moartea și problematica iertării păcatului sfidător deliberat 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The current study tackles two issues. The first one is the issue of the need for understanding the problem of the inexpiable sin and the application of the death penalty within the OT Israel. The main interest has been the searching for the criteria upon which this penalty was applied. Consequently, we have enquired into the way we could explain the differentiation between sins within the sin spectrum, considering different levels of guilt and moral responsibility, and then we have looked into the OT casuistry for some hints considering the application of the death penalty in the case of the defiant, inexpiable sin. The second issue of this paper is determined by the question regarding the far-reaching implications of the correct understanding of the first one for the field of applied theology: “Have I committed a sin too great for God to forgive?”, ”Am I too bad to be saved?” In the light of these questions one can understand why the stress upon the basis on which the types of sin have been differentiated according to the forgiveness and expiation wrought through OT Sanctuary services. inadvertent sin defiant sin death penalty expiable/inexpiable Doctrinal Theology In TheoRhēma Editura Universității Adventus, 2022 8(2013), 1 (DE-627)DOAJ078622905 27842665 nnns volume:8 year:2013 number:1 https://doaj.org/article/b279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792 kostenfrei https://publications.uadventus.ro/index.php/thrh/article/view/55 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1842-0613 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2784-2665 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 8 2013 1 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ039309401 (DE-599)DOAJb279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa hun rum BT10-1480 Florin Iacob verfasserin aut Pedeapsa cu moartea și problematica iertării păcatului sfidător deliberat 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The current study tackles two issues. The first one is the issue of the need for understanding the problem of the inexpiable sin and the application of the death penalty within the OT Israel. The main interest has been the searching for the criteria upon which this penalty was applied. Consequently, we have enquired into the way we could explain the differentiation between sins within the sin spectrum, considering different levels of guilt and moral responsibility, and then we have looked into the OT casuistry for some hints considering the application of the death penalty in the case of the defiant, inexpiable sin. The second issue of this paper is determined by the question regarding the far-reaching implications of the correct understanding of the first one for the field of applied theology: “Have I committed a sin too great for God to forgive?”, ”Am I too bad to be saved?” In the light of these questions one can understand why the stress upon the basis on which the types of sin have been differentiated according to the forgiveness and expiation wrought through OT Sanctuary services. inadvertent sin defiant sin death penalty expiable/inexpiable Doctrinal Theology In TheoRhēma Editura Universității Adventus, 2022 8(2013), 1 (DE-627)DOAJ078622905 27842665 nnns volume:8 year:2013 number:1 https://doaj.org/article/b279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792 kostenfrei https://publications.uadventus.ro/index.php/thrh/article/view/55 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1842-0613 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2784-2665 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 8 2013 1 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ039309401 (DE-599)DOAJb279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa hun rum BT10-1480 Florin Iacob verfasserin aut Pedeapsa cu moartea și problematica iertării păcatului sfidător deliberat 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The current study tackles two issues. The first one is the issue of the need for understanding the problem of the inexpiable sin and the application of the death penalty within the OT Israel. The main interest has been the searching for the criteria upon which this penalty was applied. Consequently, we have enquired into the way we could explain the differentiation between sins within the sin spectrum, considering different levels of guilt and moral responsibility, and then we have looked into the OT casuistry for some hints considering the application of the death penalty in the case of the defiant, inexpiable sin. The second issue of this paper is determined by the question regarding the far-reaching implications of the correct understanding of the first one for the field of applied theology: “Have I committed a sin too great for God to forgive?”, ”Am I too bad to be saved?” In the light of these questions one can understand why the stress upon the basis on which the types of sin have been differentiated according to the forgiveness and expiation wrought through OT Sanctuary services. inadvertent sin defiant sin death penalty expiable/inexpiable Doctrinal Theology In TheoRhēma Editura Universității Adventus, 2022 8(2013), 1 (DE-627)DOAJ078622905 27842665 nnns volume:8 year:2013 number:1 https://doaj.org/article/b279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792 kostenfrei https://publications.uadventus.ro/index.php/thrh/article/view/55 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1842-0613 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2784-2665 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 8 2013 1 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ039309401 (DE-599)DOAJb279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa hun rum BT10-1480 Florin Iacob verfasserin aut Pedeapsa cu moartea și problematica iertării păcatului sfidător deliberat 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The current study tackles two issues. The first one is the issue of the need for understanding the problem of the inexpiable sin and the application of the death penalty within the OT Israel. The main interest has been the searching for the criteria upon which this penalty was applied. Consequently, we have enquired into the way we could explain the differentiation between sins within the sin spectrum, considering different levels of guilt and moral responsibility, and then we have looked into the OT casuistry for some hints considering the application of the death penalty in the case of the defiant, inexpiable sin. The second issue of this paper is determined by the question regarding the far-reaching implications of the correct understanding of the first one for the field of applied theology: “Have I committed a sin too great for God to forgive?”, ”Am I too bad to be saved?” In the light of these questions one can understand why the stress upon the basis on which the types of sin have been differentiated according to the forgiveness and expiation wrought through OT Sanctuary services. inadvertent sin defiant sin death penalty expiable/inexpiable Doctrinal Theology In TheoRhēma Editura Universității Adventus, 2022 8(2013), 1 (DE-627)DOAJ078622905 27842665 nnns volume:8 year:2013 number:1 https://doaj.org/article/b279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792 kostenfrei https://publications.uadventus.ro/index.php/thrh/article/view/55 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1842-0613 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2784-2665 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 8 2013 1 |
| language |
English Spanish Hungarian Romanian |
| source |
In TheoRhēma 8(2013), 1 volume:8 year:2013 number:1 |
| sourceStr |
In TheoRhēma 8(2013), 1 volume:8 year:2013 number:1 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
inadvertent sin defiant sin death penalty expiable/inexpiable Doctrinal Theology |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
TheoRhēma |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Florin Iacob @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
DOAJ078622905 |
| id |
DOAJ039309401 |
| language_de |
englisch spanisch ungarisch rumaenisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ039309401</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230526111946.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ039309401</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">hun</subfield><subfield code="a">rum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BT10-1480</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Florin Iacob</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pedeapsa cu moartea și problematica iertării păcatului sfidător deliberat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The current study tackles two issues. The first one is the issue of the need for understanding the problem of the inexpiable sin and the application of the death penalty within the OT Israel. The main interest has been the searching for the criteria upon which this penalty was applied. Consequently, we have enquired into the way we could explain the differentiation between sins within the sin spectrum, considering different levels of guilt and moral responsibility, and then we have looked into the OT casuistry for some hints considering the application of the death penalty in the case of the defiant, inexpiable sin. The second issue of this paper is determined by the question regarding the far-reaching implications of the correct understanding of the first one for the field of applied theology: “Have I committed a sin too great for God to forgive?”, ”Am I too bad to be saved?” In the light of these questions one can understand why the stress upon the basis on which the types of sin have been differentiated according to the forgiveness and expiation wrought through OT Sanctuary services.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">inadvertent sin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">defiant sin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">death penalty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">expiable/inexpiable</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Doctrinal Theology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">TheoRhēma</subfield><subfield code="d">Editura Universității Adventus, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2013), 1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ078622905</subfield><subfield code="x">27842665</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://publications.uadventus.ro/index.php/thrh/article/view/55</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1842-0613</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2784-2665</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
| author |
Florin Iacob |
| spellingShingle |
Florin Iacob misc BT10-1480 misc inadvertent sin misc defiant sin misc death penalty misc expiable/inexpiable misc Doctrinal Theology Pedeapsa cu moartea și problematica iertării păcatului sfidător deliberat |
| authorStr |
Florin Iacob |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)DOAJ078622905 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
BT10-1480 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
27842665 |
| topic_title |
BT10-1480 Pedeapsa cu moartea și problematica iertării păcatului sfidător deliberat inadvertent sin defiant sin death penalty expiable/inexpiable |
| topic |
misc BT10-1480 misc inadvertent sin misc defiant sin misc death penalty misc expiable/inexpiable misc Doctrinal Theology |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc BT10-1480 misc inadvertent sin misc defiant sin misc death penalty misc expiable/inexpiable misc Doctrinal Theology |
| topic_browse |
misc BT10-1480 misc inadvertent sin misc defiant sin misc death penalty misc expiable/inexpiable misc Doctrinal Theology |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
TheoRhēma |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
DOAJ078622905 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
TheoRhēma |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)DOAJ078622905 |
| title |
Pedeapsa cu moartea și problematica iertării păcatului sfidător deliberat |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ039309401 (DE-599)DOAJb279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792 |
| title_full |
Pedeapsa cu moartea și problematica iertării păcatului sfidător deliberat |
| author_sort |
Florin Iacob |
| journal |
TheoRhēma |
| journalStr |
TheoRhēma |
| callnumber-first-code |
B |
| lang_code |
eng spa hun rum |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2013 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Florin Iacob |
| container_volume |
8 |
| class |
BT10-1480 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Florin Iacob |
| title_sort |
pedeapsa cu moartea și problematica iertării păcatului sfidător deliberat |
| callnumber |
BT10-1480 |
| title_auth |
Pedeapsa cu moartea și problematica iertării păcatului sfidător deliberat |
| abstract |
The current study tackles two issues. The first one is the issue of the need for understanding the problem of the inexpiable sin and the application of the death penalty within the OT Israel. The main interest has been the searching for the criteria upon which this penalty was applied. Consequently, we have enquired into the way we could explain the differentiation between sins within the sin spectrum, considering different levels of guilt and moral responsibility, and then we have looked into the OT casuistry for some hints considering the application of the death penalty in the case of the defiant, inexpiable sin. The second issue of this paper is determined by the question regarding the far-reaching implications of the correct understanding of the first one for the field of applied theology: “Have I committed a sin too great for God to forgive?”, ”Am I too bad to be saved?” In the light of these questions one can understand why the stress upon the basis on which the types of sin have been differentiated according to the forgiveness and expiation wrought through OT Sanctuary services. |
| abstractGer |
The current study tackles two issues. The first one is the issue of the need for understanding the problem of the inexpiable sin and the application of the death penalty within the OT Israel. The main interest has been the searching for the criteria upon which this penalty was applied. Consequently, we have enquired into the way we could explain the differentiation between sins within the sin spectrum, considering different levels of guilt and moral responsibility, and then we have looked into the OT casuistry for some hints considering the application of the death penalty in the case of the defiant, inexpiable sin. The second issue of this paper is determined by the question regarding the far-reaching implications of the correct understanding of the first one for the field of applied theology: “Have I committed a sin too great for God to forgive?”, ”Am I too bad to be saved?” In the light of these questions one can understand why the stress upon the basis on which the types of sin have been differentiated according to the forgiveness and expiation wrought through OT Sanctuary services. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The current study tackles two issues. The first one is the issue of the need for understanding the problem of the inexpiable sin and the application of the death penalty within the OT Israel. The main interest has been the searching for the criteria upon which this penalty was applied. Consequently, we have enquired into the way we could explain the differentiation between sins within the sin spectrum, considering different levels of guilt and moral responsibility, and then we have looked into the OT casuistry for some hints considering the application of the death penalty in the case of the defiant, inexpiable sin. The second issue of this paper is determined by the question regarding the far-reaching implications of the correct understanding of the first one for the field of applied theology: “Have I committed a sin too great for God to forgive?”, ”Am I too bad to be saved?” In the light of these questions one can understand why the stress upon the basis on which the types of sin have been differentiated according to the forgiveness and expiation wrought through OT Sanctuary services. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Pedeapsa cu moartea și problematica iertării păcatului sfidător deliberat |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/b279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792 https://publications.uadventus.ro/index.php/thrh/article/view/55 https://doaj.org/toc/1842-0613 https://doaj.org/toc/2784-2665 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
DOAJ078622905 |
| callnumber-subject |
BT - Doctrinal Theology |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| callnumber-a |
BT10-1480 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T22:42:44.819Z |
| _version_ |
1803599546752696320 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ039309401</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230526111946.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ039309401</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">hun</subfield><subfield code="a">rum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BT10-1480</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Florin Iacob</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pedeapsa cu moartea și problematica iertării păcatului sfidător deliberat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The current study tackles two issues. The first one is the issue of the need for understanding the problem of the inexpiable sin and the application of the death penalty within the OT Israel. The main interest has been the searching for the criteria upon which this penalty was applied. Consequently, we have enquired into the way we could explain the differentiation between sins within the sin spectrum, considering different levels of guilt and moral responsibility, and then we have looked into the OT casuistry for some hints considering the application of the death penalty in the case of the defiant, inexpiable sin. The second issue of this paper is determined by the question regarding the far-reaching implications of the correct understanding of the first one for the field of applied theology: “Have I committed a sin too great for God to forgive?”, ”Am I too bad to be saved?” In the light of these questions one can understand why the stress upon the basis on which the types of sin have been differentiated according to the forgiveness and expiation wrought through OT Sanctuary services.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">inadvertent sin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">defiant sin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">death penalty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">expiable/inexpiable</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Doctrinal Theology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">TheoRhēma</subfield><subfield code="d">Editura Universității Adventus, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2013), 1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ078622905</subfield><subfield code="x">27842665</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b279c65cebc34e3da71defd8492c7792</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://publications.uadventus.ro/index.php/thrh/article/view/55</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1842-0613</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2784-2665</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4011383 |