Stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services
Stormwater utility fees provide dedicated revenues for managing stormwater. In setting fees, household-level affordability should be considered. Existing research does not address methods to evaluate the affordability of stormwater utility fees, especially alongside other household water costs. This...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Erik Porse [verfasserIn] Maureen Kerner [verfasserIn] Joel Shinneman [verfasserIn] Jonathan Kaplan [verfasserIn] Samuel Stone [verfasserIn] Mary L. Cadenasso [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Water Policy - IWA Publishing, 2021, 24(2022), 6, Seite 998-1013 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:24 ; year:2022 ; number:6 ; pages:998-1013 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.2166/wp.2022.024 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ03997006X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ03997006X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230502081509.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230227s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.2166/wp.2022.024 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ03997006X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a TC401-506 | |
100 | 0 | |a Erik Porse |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Stormwater utility fees provide dedicated revenues for managing stormwater. In setting fees, household-level affordability should be considered. Existing research does not address methods to evaluate the affordability of stormwater utility fees, especially alongside other household water costs. This paper aims to fill that gap. We present a scenario-based approach to evaluate household affordability of stormwater utility fees in a municipality, which considers other essential household water service charges. We estimate the relative contribution of stormwater utility fees to total household water costs and evaluate affordability across income brackets by integrating data for socioeconomic status, land use, water utility charges, and impervious surface cover. Using data for a case study region, results indicate that stormwater utility fees are small contributors to overall household urban water costs and comprise no more than 2% of the median household income across nearly all income quintiles. For low-income households, stormwater charges only exceed 1% of the household income for the lowest-income brackets (<$20,000) and still represent a small portion of household water costs. The analysis demonstrates a generalizable approach that can be applied everywhere when evaluating a stormwater utility fee as a funding strategy. HIGHLIGHTS Stormwater utility fees provide a source of potential revenue.; Utility fee revenues can be linked with land-use patterns.; The affordability of stormwater fees should be considered alongside other water services.; Stormwater fees are small contributors to overall costs of water services but may still impact low-income residents.; Cities should examine the affordability of fees across the range of household incomes.; | ||
650 | 4 | |a california | |
650 | 4 | |a drainage | |
650 | 4 | |a finance | |
650 | 4 | |a one water | |
650 | 4 | |a urban ecology | |
650 | 4 | |a urban water management | |
653 | 0 | |a River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General) | |
700 | 0 | |a Maureen Kerner |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Joel Shinneman |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Jonathan Kaplan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Samuel Stone |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Mary L. Cadenasso |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Water Policy |d IWA Publishing, 2021 |g 24(2022), 6, Seite 998-1013 |w (DE-627)324916116 |w (DE-600)2032558-7 |x 19969759 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2022 |g number:6 |g pages:998-1013 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2022.024 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/ca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://wp.iwaponline.com/content/24/6/998 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1366-7017 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1996-9759 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2360 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 24 |j 2022 |e 6 |h 998-1013 |
author_variant |
e p ep m k mk j s js j k jk s s ss m l c mlc |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:19969759:2022----::trwtrtltfeadoshlafraiiyf |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
callnumber-subject-code |
TC |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.2166/wp.2022.024 doi (DE-627)DOAJ03997006X (DE-599)DOAJca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TC401-506 Erik Porse verfasserin aut Stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Stormwater utility fees provide dedicated revenues for managing stormwater. In setting fees, household-level affordability should be considered. Existing research does not address methods to evaluate the affordability of stormwater utility fees, especially alongside other household water costs. This paper aims to fill that gap. We present a scenario-based approach to evaluate household affordability of stormwater utility fees in a municipality, which considers other essential household water service charges. We estimate the relative contribution of stormwater utility fees to total household water costs and evaluate affordability across income brackets by integrating data for socioeconomic status, land use, water utility charges, and impervious surface cover. Using data for a case study region, results indicate that stormwater utility fees are small contributors to overall household urban water costs and comprise no more than 2% of the median household income across nearly all income quintiles. For low-income households, stormwater charges only exceed 1% of the household income for the lowest-income brackets (<$20,000) and still represent a small portion of household water costs. The analysis demonstrates a generalizable approach that can be applied everywhere when evaluating a stormwater utility fee as a funding strategy. HIGHLIGHTS Stormwater utility fees provide a source of potential revenue.; Utility fee revenues can be linked with land-use patterns.; The affordability of stormwater fees should be considered alongside other water services.; Stormwater fees are small contributors to overall costs of water services but may still impact low-income residents.; Cities should examine the affordability of fees across the range of household incomes.; california drainage finance one water urban ecology urban water management River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General) Maureen Kerner verfasserin aut Joel Shinneman verfasserin aut Jonathan Kaplan verfasserin aut Samuel Stone verfasserin aut Mary L. Cadenasso verfasserin aut In Water Policy IWA Publishing, 2021 24(2022), 6, Seite 998-1013 (DE-627)324916116 (DE-600)2032558-7 19969759 nnns volume:24 year:2022 number:6 pages:998-1013 https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2022.024 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95 kostenfrei http://wp.iwaponline.com/content/24/6/998 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1366-7017 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1996-9759 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2360 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 AR 24 2022 6 998-1013 |
spelling |
10.2166/wp.2022.024 doi (DE-627)DOAJ03997006X (DE-599)DOAJca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TC401-506 Erik Porse verfasserin aut Stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Stormwater utility fees provide dedicated revenues for managing stormwater. In setting fees, household-level affordability should be considered. Existing research does not address methods to evaluate the affordability of stormwater utility fees, especially alongside other household water costs. This paper aims to fill that gap. We present a scenario-based approach to evaluate household affordability of stormwater utility fees in a municipality, which considers other essential household water service charges. We estimate the relative contribution of stormwater utility fees to total household water costs and evaluate affordability across income brackets by integrating data for socioeconomic status, land use, water utility charges, and impervious surface cover. Using data for a case study region, results indicate that stormwater utility fees are small contributors to overall household urban water costs and comprise no more than 2% of the median household income across nearly all income quintiles. For low-income households, stormwater charges only exceed 1% of the household income for the lowest-income brackets (<$20,000) and still represent a small portion of household water costs. The analysis demonstrates a generalizable approach that can be applied everywhere when evaluating a stormwater utility fee as a funding strategy. HIGHLIGHTS Stormwater utility fees provide a source of potential revenue.; Utility fee revenues can be linked with land-use patterns.; The affordability of stormwater fees should be considered alongside other water services.; Stormwater fees are small contributors to overall costs of water services but may still impact low-income residents.; Cities should examine the affordability of fees across the range of household incomes.; california drainage finance one water urban ecology urban water management River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General) Maureen Kerner verfasserin aut Joel Shinneman verfasserin aut Jonathan Kaplan verfasserin aut Samuel Stone verfasserin aut Mary L. Cadenasso verfasserin aut In Water Policy IWA Publishing, 2021 24(2022), 6, Seite 998-1013 (DE-627)324916116 (DE-600)2032558-7 19969759 nnns volume:24 year:2022 number:6 pages:998-1013 https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2022.024 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95 kostenfrei http://wp.iwaponline.com/content/24/6/998 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1366-7017 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1996-9759 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2360 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 AR 24 2022 6 998-1013 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.2166/wp.2022.024 doi (DE-627)DOAJ03997006X (DE-599)DOAJca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TC401-506 Erik Porse verfasserin aut Stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Stormwater utility fees provide dedicated revenues for managing stormwater. In setting fees, household-level affordability should be considered. Existing research does not address methods to evaluate the affordability of stormwater utility fees, especially alongside other household water costs. This paper aims to fill that gap. We present a scenario-based approach to evaluate household affordability of stormwater utility fees in a municipality, which considers other essential household water service charges. We estimate the relative contribution of stormwater utility fees to total household water costs and evaluate affordability across income brackets by integrating data for socioeconomic status, land use, water utility charges, and impervious surface cover. Using data for a case study region, results indicate that stormwater utility fees are small contributors to overall household urban water costs and comprise no more than 2% of the median household income across nearly all income quintiles. For low-income households, stormwater charges only exceed 1% of the household income for the lowest-income brackets (<$20,000) and still represent a small portion of household water costs. The analysis demonstrates a generalizable approach that can be applied everywhere when evaluating a stormwater utility fee as a funding strategy. HIGHLIGHTS Stormwater utility fees provide a source of potential revenue.; Utility fee revenues can be linked with land-use patterns.; The affordability of stormwater fees should be considered alongside other water services.; Stormwater fees are small contributors to overall costs of water services but may still impact low-income residents.; Cities should examine the affordability of fees across the range of household incomes.; california drainage finance one water urban ecology urban water management River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General) Maureen Kerner verfasserin aut Joel Shinneman verfasserin aut Jonathan Kaplan verfasserin aut Samuel Stone verfasserin aut Mary L. Cadenasso verfasserin aut In Water Policy IWA Publishing, 2021 24(2022), 6, Seite 998-1013 (DE-627)324916116 (DE-600)2032558-7 19969759 nnns volume:24 year:2022 number:6 pages:998-1013 https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2022.024 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95 kostenfrei http://wp.iwaponline.com/content/24/6/998 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1366-7017 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1996-9759 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2360 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 AR 24 2022 6 998-1013 |
allfieldsGer |
10.2166/wp.2022.024 doi (DE-627)DOAJ03997006X (DE-599)DOAJca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TC401-506 Erik Porse verfasserin aut Stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Stormwater utility fees provide dedicated revenues for managing stormwater. In setting fees, household-level affordability should be considered. Existing research does not address methods to evaluate the affordability of stormwater utility fees, especially alongside other household water costs. This paper aims to fill that gap. We present a scenario-based approach to evaluate household affordability of stormwater utility fees in a municipality, which considers other essential household water service charges. We estimate the relative contribution of stormwater utility fees to total household water costs and evaluate affordability across income brackets by integrating data for socioeconomic status, land use, water utility charges, and impervious surface cover. Using data for a case study region, results indicate that stormwater utility fees are small contributors to overall household urban water costs and comprise no more than 2% of the median household income across nearly all income quintiles. For low-income households, stormwater charges only exceed 1% of the household income for the lowest-income brackets (<$20,000) and still represent a small portion of household water costs. The analysis demonstrates a generalizable approach that can be applied everywhere when evaluating a stormwater utility fee as a funding strategy. HIGHLIGHTS Stormwater utility fees provide a source of potential revenue.; Utility fee revenues can be linked with land-use patterns.; The affordability of stormwater fees should be considered alongside other water services.; Stormwater fees are small contributors to overall costs of water services but may still impact low-income residents.; Cities should examine the affordability of fees across the range of household incomes.; california drainage finance one water urban ecology urban water management River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General) Maureen Kerner verfasserin aut Joel Shinneman verfasserin aut Jonathan Kaplan verfasserin aut Samuel Stone verfasserin aut Mary L. Cadenasso verfasserin aut In Water Policy IWA Publishing, 2021 24(2022), 6, Seite 998-1013 (DE-627)324916116 (DE-600)2032558-7 19969759 nnns volume:24 year:2022 number:6 pages:998-1013 https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2022.024 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95 kostenfrei http://wp.iwaponline.com/content/24/6/998 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1366-7017 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1996-9759 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2360 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 AR 24 2022 6 998-1013 |
allfieldsSound |
10.2166/wp.2022.024 doi (DE-627)DOAJ03997006X (DE-599)DOAJca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TC401-506 Erik Porse verfasserin aut Stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Stormwater utility fees provide dedicated revenues for managing stormwater. In setting fees, household-level affordability should be considered. Existing research does not address methods to evaluate the affordability of stormwater utility fees, especially alongside other household water costs. This paper aims to fill that gap. We present a scenario-based approach to evaluate household affordability of stormwater utility fees in a municipality, which considers other essential household water service charges. We estimate the relative contribution of stormwater utility fees to total household water costs and evaluate affordability across income brackets by integrating data for socioeconomic status, land use, water utility charges, and impervious surface cover. Using data for a case study region, results indicate that stormwater utility fees are small contributors to overall household urban water costs and comprise no more than 2% of the median household income across nearly all income quintiles. For low-income households, stormwater charges only exceed 1% of the household income for the lowest-income brackets (<$20,000) and still represent a small portion of household water costs. The analysis demonstrates a generalizable approach that can be applied everywhere when evaluating a stormwater utility fee as a funding strategy. HIGHLIGHTS Stormwater utility fees provide a source of potential revenue.; Utility fee revenues can be linked with land-use patterns.; The affordability of stormwater fees should be considered alongside other water services.; Stormwater fees are small contributors to overall costs of water services but may still impact low-income residents.; Cities should examine the affordability of fees across the range of household incomes.; california drainage finance one water urban ecology urban water management River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General) Maureen Kerner verfasserin aut Joel Shinneman verfasserin aut Jonathan Kaplan verfasserin aut Samuel Stone verfasserin aut Mary L. Cadenasso verfasserin aut In Water Policy IWA Publishing, 2021 24(2022), 6, Seite 998-1013 (DE-627)324916116 (DE-600)2032558-7 19969759 nnns volume:24 year:2022 number:6 pages:998-1013 https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2022.024 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95 kostenfrei http://wp.iwaponline.com/content/24/6/998 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1366-7017 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1996-9759 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2360 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 AR 24 2022 6 998-1013 |
language |
English |
source |
In Water Policy 24(2022), 6, Seite 998-1013 volume:24 year:2022 number:6 pages:998-1013 |
sourceStr |
In Water Policy 24(2022), 6, Seite 998-1013 volume:24 year:2022 number:6 pages:998-1013 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
california drainage finance one water urban ecology urban water management River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General) |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Water Policy |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Erik Porse @@aut@@ Maureen Kerner @@aut@@ Joel Shinneman @@aut@@ Jonathan Kaplan @@aut@@ Samuel Stone @@aut@@ Mary L. Cadenasso @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
324916116 |
id |
DOAJ03997006X |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ03997006X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502081509.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.2166/wp.2022.024</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ03997006X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TC401-506</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Erik Porse</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stormwater utility fees provide dedicated revenues for managing stormwater. In setting fees, household-level affordability should be considered. Existing research does not address methods to evaluate the affordability of stormwater utility fees, especially alongside other household water costs. This paper aims to fill that gap. We present a scenario-based approach to evaluate household affordability of stormwater utility fees in a municipality, which considers other essential household water service charges. We estimate the relative contribution of stormwater utility fees to total household water costs and evaluate affordability across income brackets by integrating data for socioeconomic status, land use, water utility charges, and impervious surface cover. Using data for a case study region, results indicate that stormwater utility fees are small contributors to overall household urban water costs and comprise no more than 2% of the median household income across nearly all income quintiles. For low-income households, stormwater charges only exceed 1% of the household income for the lowest-income brackets (<$20,000) and still represent a small portion of household water costs. The analysis demonstrates a generalizable approach that can be applied everywhere when evaluating a stormwater utility fee as a funding strategy. HIGHLIGHTS Stormwater utility fees provide a source of potential revenue.; Utility fee revenues can be linked with land-use patterns.; The affordability of stormwater fees should be considered alongside other water services.; Stormwater fees are small contributors to overall costs of water services but may still impact low-income residents.; Cities should examine the affordability of fees across the range of household incomes.;</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">california</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">drainage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">finance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">one water</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">urban ecology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">urban water management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maureen Kerner</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Joel Shinneman</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jonathan Kaplan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Samuel Stone</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mary L. Cadenasso</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Water Policy</subfield><subfield code="d">IWA Publishing, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">24(2022), 6, Seite 998-1013</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)324916116</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2032558-7</subfield><subfield code="x">19969759</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:998-1013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2022.024</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/ca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://wp.iwaponline.com/content/24/6/998</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1366-7017</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1996-9759</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2360</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">998-1013</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
author |
Erik Porse |
spellingShingle |
Erik Porse misc TC401-506 misc california misc drainage misc finance misc one water misc urban ecology misc urban water management misc River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General) Stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services |
authorStr |
Erik Porse |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)324916116 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
TC401-506 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
19969759 |
topic_title |
TC401-506 Stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services california drainage finance one water urban ecology urban water management |
topic |
misc TC401-506 misc california misc drainage misc finance misc one water misc urban ecology misc urban water management misc River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General) |
topic_unstemmed |
misc TC401-506 misc california misc drainage misc finance misc one water misc urban ecology misc urban water management misc River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General) |
topic_browse |
misc TC401-506 misc california misc drainage misc finance misc one water misc urban ecology misc urban water management misc River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General) |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Water Policy |
hierarchy_parent_id |
324916116 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Water Policy |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)324916116 (DE-600)2032558-7 |
title |
Stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ03997006X (DE-599)DOAJca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95 |
title_full |
Stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services |
author_sort |
Erik Porse |
journal |
Water Policy |
journalStr |
Water Policy |
callnumber-first-code |
T |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
998 |
author_browse |
Erik Porse Maureen Kerner Joel Shinneman Jonathan Kaplan Samuel Stone Mary L. Cadenasso |
container_volume |
24 |
class |
TC401-506 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Erik Porse |
doi_str_mv |
10.2166/wp.2022.024 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services |
callnumber |
TC401-506 |
title_auth |
Stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services |
abstract |
Stormwater utility fees provide dedicated revenues for managing stormwater. In setting fees, household-level affordability should be considered. Existing research does not address methods to evaluate the affordability of stormwater utility fees, especially alongside other household water costs. This paper aims to fill that gap. We present a scenario-based approach to evaluate household affordability of stormwater utility fees in a municipality, which considers other essential household water service charges. We estimate the relative contribution of stormwater utility fees to total household water costs and evaluate affordability across income brackets by integrating data for socioeconomic status, land use, water utility charges, and impervious surface cover. Using data for a case study region, results indicate that stormwater utility fees are small contributors to overall household urban water costs and comprise no more than 2% of the median household income across nearly all income quintiles. For low-income households, stormwater charges only exceed 1% of the household income for the lowest-income brackets (<$20,000) and still represent a small portion of household water costs. The analysis demonstrates a generalizable approach that can be applied everywhere when evaluating a stormwater utility fee as a funding strategy. HIGHLIGHTS Stormwater utility fees provide a source of potential revenue.; Utility fee revenues can be linked with land-use patterns.; The affordability of stormwater fees should be considered alongside other water services.; Stormwater fees are small contributors to overall costs of water services but may still impact low-income residents.; Cities should examine the affordability of fees across the range of household incomes.; |
abstractGer |
Stormwater utility fees provide dedicated revenues for managing stormwater. In setting fees, household-level affordability should be considered. Existing research does not address methods to evaluate the affordability of stormwater utility fees, especially alongside other household water costs. This paper aims to fill that gap. We present a scenario-based approach to evaluate household affordability of stormwater utility fees in a municipality, which considers other essential household water service charges. We estimate the relative contribution of stormwater utility fees to total household water costs and evaluate affordability across income brackets by integrating data for socioeconomic status, land use, water utility charges, and impervious surface cover. Using data for a case study region, results indicate that stormwater utility fees are small contributors to overall household urban water costs and comprise no more than 2% of the median household income across nearly all income quintiles. For low-income households, stormwater charges only exceed 1% of the household income for the lowest-income brackets (<$20,000) and still represent a small portion of household water costs. The analysis demonstrates a generalizable approach that can be applied everywhere when evaluating a stormwater utility fee as a funding strategy. HIGHLIGHTS Stormwater utility fees provide a source of potential revenue.; Utility fee revenues can be linked with land-use patterns.; The affordability of stormwater fees should be considered alongside other water services.; Stormwater fees are small contributors to overall costs of water services but may still impact low-income residents.; Cities should examine the affordability of fees across the range of household incomes.; |
abstract_unstemmed |
Stormwater utility fees provide dedicated revenues for managing stormwater. In setting fees, household-level affordability should be considered. Existing research does not address methods to evaluate the affordability of stormwater utility fees, especially alongside other household water costs. This paper aims to fill that gap. We present a scenario-based approach to evaluate household affordability of stormwater utility fees in a municipality, which considers other essential household water service charges. We estimate the relative contribution of stormwater utility fees to total household water costs and evaluate affordability across income brackets by integrating data for socioeconomic status, land use, water utility charges, and impervious surface cover. Using data for a case study region, results indicate that stormwater utility fees are small contributors to overall household urban water costs and comprise no more than 2% of the median household income across nearly all income quintiles. For low-income households, stormwater charges only exceed 1% of the household income for the lowest-income brackets (<$20,000) and still represent a small portion of household water costs. The analysis demonstrates a generalizable approach that can be applied everywhere when evaluating a stormwater utility fee as a funding strategy. HIGHLIGHTS Stormwater utility fees provide a source of potential revenue.; Utility fee revenues can be linked with land-use patterns.; The affordability of stormwater fees should be considered alongside other water services.; Stormwater fees are small contributors to overall costs of water services but may still impact low-income residents.; Cities should examine the affordability of fees across the range of household incomes.; |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2360 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 |
container_issue |
6 |
title_short |
Stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2022.024 https://doaj.org/article/ca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95 http://wp.iwaponline.com/content/24/6/998 https://doaj.org/toc/1366-7017 https://doaj.org/toc/1996-9759 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Maureen Kerner Joel Shinneman Jonathan Kaplan Samuel Stone Mary L. Cadenasso |
author2Str |
Maureen Kerner Joel Shinneman Jonathan Kaplan Samuel Stone Mary L. Cadenasso |
ppnlink |
324916116 |
callnumber-subject |
TC - Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.2166/wp.2022.024 |
callnumber-a |
TC401-506 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T01:26:58.822Z |
_version_ |
1803609879430037504 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ03997006X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502081509.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.2166/wp.2022.024</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ03997006X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TC401-506</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Erik Porse</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Stormwater utility fees and household affordability of urban water services</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stormwater utility fees provide dedicated revenues for managing stormwater. In setting fees, household-level affordability should be considered. Existing research does not address methods to evaluate the affordability of stormwater utility fees, especially alongside other household water costs. This paper aims to fill that gap. We present a scenario-based approach to evaluate household affordability of stormwater utility fees in a municipality, which considers other essential household water service charges. We estimate the relative contribution of stormwater utility fees to total household water costs and evaluate affordability across income brackets by integrating data for socioeconomic status, land use, water utility charges, and impervious surface cover. Using data for a case study region, results indicate that stormwater utility fees are small contributors to overall household urban water costs and comprise no more than 2% of the median household income across nearly all income quintiles. For low-income households, stormwater charges only exceed 1% of the household income for the lowest-income brackets (<$20,000) and still represent a small portion of household water costs. The analysis demonstrates a generalizable approach that can be applied everywhere when evaluating a stormwater utility fee as a funding strategy. HIGHLIGHTS Stormwater utility fees provide a source of potential revenue.; Utility fee revenues can be linked with land-use patterns.; The affordability of stormwater fees should be considered alongside other water services.; Stormwater fees are small contributors to overall costs of water services but may still impact low-income residents.; Cities should examine the affordability of fees across the range of household incomes.;</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">california</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">drainage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">finance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">one water</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">urban ecology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">urban water management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maureen Kerner</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Joel Shinneman</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jonathan Kaplan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Samuel Stone</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mary L. Cadenasso</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Water Policy</subfield><subfield code="d">IWA Publishing, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">24(2022), 6, Seite 998-1013</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)324916116</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2032558-7</subfield><subfield code="x">19969759</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:998-1013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2022.024</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/ca3e3328a612406aa9bc11074a7bfc95</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://wp.iwaponline.com/content/24/6/998</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1366-7017</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1996-9759</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2360</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">998-1013</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3994503 |