Metaphysics and the Limit of the Natural Sciences Explanatory Power

The article concern is the problem of natural sciences – metaphysics relations. The criterion of metaphysical knowledge as the knowledge about fundamental objects is formulated. It is argued that natural sciences and mathematics do not meet this criterion. They cannot be metaphysics being engaged in...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Aleksandr Kulieshov [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch ; Russisch ; Ukrainisch

Erschienen:	2017

Schlagwörter:	metaphysics natural sciences naturalistic metaphysics speculative metaphysics fundamental knowledge non-fundamental knowledge

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Traektoriâ Nauki - Altezoro s.r.o. (Slovak Republic) and Publishing Center "Dialog" (Ukraine), 2016, 3(2017), 2, Seite 6.1-6.6
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:3 ; year:2017 ; number:2 ; pages:6.1-6.6

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.22178/pos.19-9

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ04070212X

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ04070212X
003	DE-627
005	20230308041124.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.22178/pos.19-9 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ04070212X
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJc49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng \|a rus \|a ukr
100	0		\|a Aleksandr Kulieshov \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Metaphysics and the Limit of the Natural Sciences Explanatory Power
264		1	\|c 2017
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The article concern is the problem of natural sciences – metaphysics relations. The criterion of metaphysical knowledge as the knowledge about fundamental objects is formulated. It is argued that natural sciences and mathematics do not meet this criterion. They cannot be metaphysics being engaged in the study of exclusively non-fundamental entities. The inference is made that only the speculative metaphysics (if such metaphysics is possible) has the means to solve metaphysical problems relying entirely on its own foundation.
650		4	\|a metaphysics
650		4	\|a natural sciences
650		4	\|a naturalistic metaphysics
650		4	\|a speculative metaphysics
650		4	\|a fundamental knowledge
650		4	\|a non-fundamental knowledge
653		0	\|a Science
653		0	\|a Q
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Traektoriâ Nauki \|d Altezoro s.r.o. (Slovak Republic) and Publishing Center "Dialog" (Ukraine), 2016 \|g 3(2017), 2, Seite 6.1-6.6 \|w (DE-627)840814925 \|w (DE-600)2840602-3 \|x 24139009 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:3 \|g year:2017 \|g number:2 \|g pages:6.1-6.6
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.19-9 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/c49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/301/354 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2413-9009 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_374
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2863
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 3 \|j 2017 \|e 2 \|h 6.1-6.6

Indexfelder

author_variant	a k ak
matchkey_str	article:24139009:2017----::eahscadhlmtfhntrlcecs
hierarchy_sort_str	2017
publishDate	2017
allfields	10.22178/pos.19-9 doi (DE-627)DOAJ04070212X (DE-599)DOAJc49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus ukr Aleksandr Kulieshov verfasserin aut Metaphysics and the Limit of the Natural Sciences Explanatory Power 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article concern is the problem of natural sciences – metaphysics relations. The criterion of metaphysical knowledge as the knowledge about fundamental objects is formulated. It is argued that natural sciences and mathematics do not meet this criterion. They cannot be metaphysics being engaged in the study of exclusively non-fundamental entities. The inference is made that only the speculative metaphysics (if such metaphysics is possible) has the means to solve metaphysical problems relying entirely on its own foundation. metaphysics natural sciences naturalistic metaphysics speculative metaphysics fundamental knowledge non-fundamental knowledge Science Q In Traektoriâ Nauki Altezoro s.r.o. (Slovak Republic) and Publishing Center "Dialog" (Ukraine), 2016 3(2017), 2, Seite 6.1-6.6 (DE-627)840814925 (DE-600)2840602-3 24139009 nnns volume:3 year:2017 number:2 pages:6.1-6.6 https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.19-9 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071 kostenfrei http://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/301/354 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2413-9009 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2017 2 6.1-6.6
spelling	10.22178/pos.19-9 doi (DE-627)DOAJ04070212X (DE-599)DOAJc49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus ukr Aleksandr Kulieshov verfasserin aut Metaphysics and the Limit of the Natural Sciences Explanatory Power 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article concern is the problem of natural sciences – metaphysics relations. The criterion of metaphysical knowledge as the knowledge about fundamental objects is formulated. It is argued that natural sciences and mathematics do not meet this criterion. They cannot be metaphysics being engaged in the study of exclusively non-fundamental entities. The inference is made that only the speculative metaphysics (if such metaphysics is possible) has the means to solve metaphysical problems relying entirely on its own foundation. metaphysics natural sciences naturalistic metaphysics speculative metaphysics fundamental knowledge non-fundamental knowledge Science Q In Traektoriâ Nauki Altezoro s.r.o. (Slovak Republic) and Publishing Center "Dialog" (Ukraine), 2016 3(2017), 2, Seite 6.1-6.6 (DE-627)840814925 (DE-600)2840602-3 24139009 nnns volume:3 year:2017 number:2 pages:6.1-6.6 https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.19-9 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071 kostenfrei http://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/301/354 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2413-9009 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2017 2 6.1-6.6
allfields_unstemmed	10.22178/pos.19-9 doi (DE-627)DOAJ04070212X (DE-599)DOAJc49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus ukr Aleksandr Kulieshov verfasserin aut Metaphysics and the Limit of the Natural Sciences Explanatory Power 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article concern is the problem of natural sciences – metaphysics relations. The criterion of metaphysical knowledge as the knowledge about fundamental objects is formulated. It is argued that natural sciences and mathematics do not meet this criterion. They cannot be metaphysics being engaged in the study of exclusively non-fundamental entities. The inference is made that only the speculative metaphysics (if such metaphysics is possible) has the means to solve metaphysical problems relying entirely on its own foundation. metaphysics natural sciences naturalistic metaphysics speculative metaphysics fundamental knowledge non-fundamental knowledge Science Q In Traektoriâ Nauki Altezoro s.r.o. (Slovak Republic) and Publishing Center "Dialog" (Ukraine), 2016 3(2017), 2, Seite 6.1-6.6 (DE-627)840814925 (DE-600)2840602-3 24139009 nnns volume:3 year:2017 number:2 pages:6.1-6.6 https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.19-9 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071 kostenfrei http://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/301/354 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2413-9009 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2017 2 6.1-6.6
allfieldsGer	10.22178/pos.19-9 doi (DE-627)DOAJ04070212X (DE-599)DOAJc49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus ukr Aleksandr Kulieshov verfasserin aut Metaphysics and the Limit of the Natural Sciences Explanatory Power 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article concern is the problem of natural sciences – metaphysics relations. The criterion of metaphysical knowledge as the knowledge about fundamental objects is formulated. It is argued that natural sciences and mathematics do not meet this criterion. They cannot be metaphysics being engaged in the study of exclusively non-fundamental entities. The inference is made that only the speculative metaphysics (if such metaphysics is possible) has the means to solve metaphysical problems relying entirely on its own foundation. metaphysics natural sciences naturalistic metaphysics speculative metaphysics fundamental knowledge non-fundamental knowledge Science Q In Traektoriâ Nauki Altezoro s.r.o. (Slovak Republic) and Publishing Center "Dialog" (Ukraine), 2016 3(2017), 2, Seite 6.1-6.6 (DE-627)840814925 (DE-600)2840602-3 24139009 nnns volume:3 year:2017 number:2 pages:6.1-6.6 https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.19-9 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071 kostenfrei http://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/301/354 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2413-9009 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2017 2 6.1-6.6
allfieldsSound	10.22178/pos.19-9 doi (DE-627)DOAJ04070212X (DE-599)DOAJc49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus ukr Aleksandr Kulieshov verfasserin aut Metaphysics and the Limit of the Natural Sciences Explanatory Power 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article concern is the problem of natural sciences – metaphysics relations. The criterion of metaphysical knowledge as the knowledge about fundamental objects is formulated. It is argued that natural sciences and mathematics do not meet this criterion. They cannot be metaphysics being engaged in the study of exclusively non-fundamental entities. The inference is made that only the speculative metaphysics (if such metaphysics is possible) has the means to solve metaphysical problems relying entirely on its own foundation. metaphysics natural sciences naturalistic metaphysics speculative metaphysics fundamental knowledge non-fundamental knowledge Science Q In Traektoriâ Nauki Altezoro s.r.o. (Slovak Republic) and Publishing Center "Dialog" (Ukraine), 2016 3(2017), 2, Seite 6.1-6.6 (DE-627)840814925 (DE-600)2840602-3 24139009 nnns volume:3 year:2017 number:2 pages:6.1-6.6 https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.19-9 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071 kostenfrei http://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/301/354 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2413-9009 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2017 2 6.1-6.6
language	English Russian Ukrainian
source	In Traektoriâ Nauki 3(2017), 2, Seite 6.1-6.6 volume:3 year:2017 number:2 pages:6.1-6.6
sourceStr	In Traektoriâ Nauki 3(2017), 2, Seite 6.1-6.6 volume:3 year:2017 number:2 pages:6.1-6.6
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	metaphysics natural sciences naturalistic metaphysics speculative metaphysics fundamental knowledge non-fundamental knowledge Science Q
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Traektoriâ Nauki
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Aleksandr Kulieshov @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	840814925
id	DOAJ04070212X
language_de	englisch russisch ukrainisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ04070212X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308041124.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22178/pos.19-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ04070212X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJc49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield><subfield code="a">ukr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aleksandr Kulieshov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Metaphysics and the Limit of the Natural Sciences Explanatory Power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article concern is the problem of natural sciences – metaphysics relations. The criterion of metaphysical knowledge as the knowledge about fundamental objects is formulated. It is argued that natural sciences and mathematics do not meet this criterion. They cannot be metaphysics being engaged in the study of exclusively non-fundamental entities. The inference is made that only the speculative metaphysics (if such metaphysics is possible) has the means to solve metaphysical problems relying entirely on its own foundation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">metaphysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">natural sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">naturalistic metaphysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">speculative metaphysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">fundamental knowledge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">non-fundamental knowledge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Q</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Traektoriâ Nauki</subfield><subfield code="d">Altezoro s.r.o. (Slovak Republic) and Publishing Center "Dialog" (Ukraine), 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2017), 2, Seite 6.1-6.6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)840814925</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2840602-3</subfield><subfield code="x">24139009</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:6.1-6.6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.19-9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/c49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/301/354</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2413-9009</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">6.1-6.6</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Aleksandr Kulieshov
spellingShingle	Aleksandr Kulieshov misc metaphysics misc natural sciences misc naturalistic metaphysics misc speculative metaphysics misc fundamental knowledge misc non-fundamental knowledge misc Science misc Q Metaphysics and the Limit of the Natural Sciences Explanatory Power
authorStr	Aleksandr Kulieshov
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)840814925
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	24139009
topic_title	Metaphysics and the Limit of the Natural Sciences Explanatory Power metaphysics natural sciences naturalistic metaphysics speculative metaphysics fundamental knowledge non-fundamental knowledge
topic	misc metaphysics misc natural sciences misc naturalistic metaphysics misc speculative metaphysics misc fundamental knowledge misc non-fundamental knowledge misc Science misc Q
topic_unstemmed	misc metaphysics misc natural sciences misc naturalistic metaphysics misc speculative metaphysics misc fundamental knowledge misc non-fundamental knowledge misc Science misc Q
topic_browse	misc metaphysics misc natural sciences misc naturalistic metaphysics misc speculative metaphysics misc fundamental knowledge misc non-fundamental knowledge misc Science misc Q
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Traektoriâ Nauki
hierarchy_parent_id	840814925
hierarchy_top_title	Traektoriâ Nauki
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)840814925 (DE-600)2840602-3
title	Metaphysics and the Limit of the Natural Sciences Explanatory Power
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ04070212X (DE-599)DOAJc49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071
title_full	Metaphysics and the Limit of the Natural Sciences Explanatory Power
author_sort	Aleksandr Kulieshov
journal	Traektoriâ Nauki
journalStr	Traektoriâ Nauki
lang_code	eng rus ukr
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2017
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	6
author_browse	Aleksandr Kulieshov
container_volume	3
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Aleksandr Kulieshov
doi_str_mv	10.22178/pos.19-9
title_sort	metaphysics and the limit of the natural sciences explanatory power
title_auth	Metaphysics and the Limit of the Natural Sciences Explanatory Power
abstract	The article concern is the problem of natural sciences – metaphysics relations. The criterion of metaphysical knowledge as the knowledge about fundamental objects is formulated. It is argued that natural sciences and mathematics do not meet this criterion. They cannot be metaphysics being engaged in the study of exclusively non-fundamental entities. The inference is made that only the speculative metaphysics (if such metaphysics is possible) has the means to solve metaphysical problems relying entirely on its own foundation.
abstractGer	The article concern is the problem of natural sciences – metaphysics relations. The criterion of metaphysical knowledge as the knowledge about fundamental objects is formulated. It is argued that natural sciences and mathematics do not meet this criterion. They cannot be metaphysics being engaged in the study of exclusively non-fundamental entities. The inference is made that only the speculative metaphysics (if such metaphysics is possible) has the means to solve metaphysical problems relying entirely on its own foundation.
abstract_unstemmed	The article concern is the problem of natural sciences – metaphysics relations. The criterion of metaphysical knowledge as the knowledge about fundamental objects is formulated. It is argued that natural sciences and mathematics do not meet this criterion. They cannot be metaphysics being engaged in the study of exclusively non-fundamental entities. The inference is made that only the speculative metaphysics (if such metaphysics is possible) has the means to solve metaphysical problems relying entirely on its own foundation.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	2
title_short	Metaphysics and the Limit of the Natural Sciences Explanatory Power
url	https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.19-9 https://doaj.org/article/c49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071 http://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/301/354 https://doaj.org/toc/2413-9009
remote_bool	true
ppnlink	840814925
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.22178/pos.19-9
up_date	2024-07-03T16:16:52.722Z
_version_	1803575270018383872
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ04070212X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308041124.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22178/pos.19-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ04070212X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJc49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield><subfield code="a">ukr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aleksandr Kulieshov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Metaphysics and the Limit of the Natural Sciences Explanatory Power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article concern is the problem of natural sciences – metaphysics relations. The criterion of metaphysical knowledge as the knowledge about fundamental objects is formulated. It is argued that natural sciences and mathematics do not meet this criterion. They cannot be metaphysics being engaged in the study of exclusively non-fundamental entities. The inference is made that only the speculative metaphysics (if such metaphysics is possible) has the means to solve metaphysical problems relying entirely on its own foundation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">metaphysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">natural sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">naturalistic metaphysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">speculative metaphysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">fundamental knowledge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">non-fundamental knowledge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Q</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Traektoriâ Nauki</subfield><subfield code="d">Altezoro s.r.o. (Slovak Republic) and Publishing Center "Dialog" (Ukraine), 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2017), 2, Seite 6.1-6.6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)840814925</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2840602-3</subfield><subfield code="x">24139009</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:6.1-6.6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.19-9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/c49efc387a8d4b8c92dff6066363f071</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/301/354</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2413-9009</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">6.1-6.6</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400508

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Metaphysics and the Limit of the Natural Sciences Explanatory Power

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?