Which One is Better? Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom
In this study, the effect of using Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the subject of “Atoms-The Basic Unit of Matter” in science course of 6th grade on academic achievement was examined. Pre-test post-test control group research was used in the study. Study population is all secondary schools in...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Hakan Turkmen [verfasserIn] Didem Buyukaltay [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
cooperative learning, jigsaw ii technique, jigsaw iv technique |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health - Seyit Ahmet Kıray, 2020, 1(2015), 2, Seite 88-94 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:1 ; year:2015 ; number:2 ; pages:88-94 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ040943003 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ040943003 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230310182430.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ040943003 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a LC8-6691 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Hakan Turkmen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Which One is Better? Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this study, the effect of using Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the subject of “Atoms-The Basic Unit of Matter” in science course of 6th grade on academic achievement was examined. Pre-test post-test control group research was used in the study. Study population is all secondary schools in Turgutlu district of Manisa province and the sample group was determined from “Samiye Nuri Sevil Secondary School” among 20 secondary schools in Turgutlu district through cluster sampling method. The experiment and control groups of the research were constituted from two branches based on the results of pre-test and there are 48 persons in total of which 24 are in experiment and 24 are in control group. In the study, the subject of “Atoms- the Basic Unit of Matter” was taught to the experiment group by using Jigsaw IV technique and it was taught to the control group by using Jigsaw II technique. In this research, Science achievement test consisting of 12 multiple-choice items which were developed by the researcher was used. T-test was used for the analysis of data obtained as a result of achievement test. In paired samples t-test (dependent group) conducted for achievement pre-tests and post-tests of the control and experiment group a significant difference was found, while no significant difference in terms of statistics in favor of the experiment group was found in independent samples t-test (independent group) conducted for post-tests of the control and experiment groups. At the end of the research, although the effect of Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the achievement in Science course was found to be positive on students learning, no statistical differences were found in these two techniques. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a cooperative learning, jigsaw ii technique, jigsaw iv technique | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Education | |
| 653 | 0 | |a L | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Special aspects of education | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Didem Buyukaltay |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health |d Seyit Ahmet Kıray, 2020 |g 1(2015), 2, Seite 88-94 |w (DE-627)1760636819 |x 2149214X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:88-94 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://jeseh.net/index.php/jeseh/article/view/9 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2149-214X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 1 |j 2015 |e 2 |h 88-94 | ||
| author_variant |
h t ht d b db |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:2149214X:2015----::hcoesetriswiessiswvnhsbetfhbidn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
LC |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ040943003 (DE-599)DOAJ4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng LC8-6691 Hakan Turkmen verfasserin aut Which One is Better? Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this study, the effect of using Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the subject of “Atoms-The Basic Unit of Matter” in science course of 6th grade on academic achievement was examined. Pre-test post-test control group research was used in the study. Study population is all secondary schools in Turgutlu district of Manisa province and the sample group was determined from “Samiye Nuri Sevil Secondary School” among 20 secondary schools in Turgutlu district through cluster sampling method. The experiment and control groups of the research were constituted from two branches based on the results of pre-test and there are 48 persons in total of which 24 are in experiment and 24 are in control group. In the study, the subject of “Atoms- the Basic Unit of Matter” was taught to the experiment group by using Jigsaw IV technique and it was taught to the control group by using Jigsaw II technique. In this research, Science achievement test consisting of 12 multiple-choice items which were developed by the researcher was used. T-test was used for the analysis of data obtained as a result of achievement test. In paired samples t-test (dependent group) conducted for achievement pre-tests and post-tests of the control and experiment group a significant difference was found, while no significant difference in terms of statistics in favor of the experiment group was found in independent samples t-test (independent group) conducted for post-tests of the control and experiment groups. At the end of the research, although the effect of Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the achievement in Science course was found to be positive on students learning, no statistical differences were found in these two techniques. cooperative learning, jigsaw ii technique, jigsaw iv technique Education L Special aspects of education Didem Buyukaltay verfasserin aut In Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health Seyit Ahmet Kıray, 2020 1(2015), 2, Seite 88-94 (DE-627)1760636819 2149214X nnns volume:1 year:2015 number:2 pages:88-94 https://doaj.org/article/4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694 kostenfrei https://jeseh.net/index.php/jeseh/article/view/9 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2149-214X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2015 2 88-94 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ040943003 (DE-599)DOAJ4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng LC8-6691 Hakan Turkmen verfasserin aut Which One is Better? Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this study, the effect of using Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the subject of “Atoms-The Basic Unit of Matter” in science course of 6th grade on academic achievement was examined. Pre-test post-test control group research was used in the study. Study population is all secondary schools in Turgutlu district of Manisa province and the sample group was determined from “Samiye Nuri Sevil Secondary School” among 20 secondary schools in Turgutlu district through cluster sampling method. The experiment and control groups of the research were constituted from two branches based on the results of pre-test and there are 48 persons in total of which 24 are in experiment and 24 are in control group. In the study, the subject of “Atoms- the Basic Unit of Matter” was taught to the experiment group by using Jigsaw IV technique and it was taught to the control group by using Jigsaw II technique. In this research, Science achievement test consisting of 12 multiple-choice items which were developed by the researcher was used. T-test was used for the analysis of data obtained as a result of achievement test. In paired samples t-test (dependent group) conducted for achievement pre-tests and post-tests of the control and experiment group a significant difference was found, while no significant difference in terms of statistics in favor of the experiment group was found in independent samples t-test (independent group) conducted for post-tests of the control and experiment groups. At the end of the research, although the effect of Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the achievement in Science course was found to be positive on students learning, no statistical differences were found in these two techniques. cooperative learning, jigsaw ii technique, jigsaw iv technique Education L Special aspects of education Didem Buyukaltay verfasserin aut In Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health Seyit Ahmet Kıray, 2020 1(2015), 2, Seite 88-94 (DE-627)1760636819 2149214X nnns volume:1 year:2015 number:2 pages:88-94 https://doaj.org/article/4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694 kostenfrei https://jeseh.net/index.php/jeseh/article/view/9 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2149-214X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2015 2 88-94 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ040943003 (DE-599)DOAJ4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng LC8-6691 Hakan Turkmen verfasserin aut Which One is Better? Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this study, the effect of using Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the subject of “Atoms-The Basic Unit of Matter” in science course of 6th grade on academic achievement was examined. Pre-test post-test control group research was used in the study. Study population is all secondary schools in Turgutlu district of Manisa province and the sample group was determined from “Samiye Nuri Sevil Secondary School” among 20 secondary schools in Turgutlu district through cluster sampling method. The experiment and control groups of the research were constituted from two branches based on the results of pre-test and there are 48 persons in total of which 24 are in experiment and 24 are in control group. In the study, the subject of “Atoms- the Basic Unit of Matter” was taught to the experiment group by using Jigsaw IV technique and it was taught to the control group by using Jigsaw II technique. In this research, Science achievement test consisting of 12 multiple-choice items which were developed by the researcher was used. T-test was used for the analysis of data obtained as a result of achievement test. In paired samples t-test (dependent group) conducted for achievement pre-tests and post-tests of the control and experiment group a significant difference was found, while no significant difference in terms of statistics in favor of the experiment group was found in independent samples t-test (independent group) conducted for post-tests of the control and experiment groups. At the end of the research, although the effect of Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the achievement in Science course was found to be positive on students learning, no statistical differences were found in these two techniques. cooperative learning, jigsaw ii technique, jigsaw iv technique Education L Special aspects of education Didem Buyukaltay verfasserin aut In Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health Seyit Ahmet Kıray, 2020 1(2015), 2, Seite 88-94 (DE-627)1760636819 2149214X nnns volume:1 year:2015 number:2 pages:88-94 https://doaj.org/article/4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694 kostenfrei https://jeseh.net/index.php/jeseh/article/view/9 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2149-214X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2015 2 88-94 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ040943003 (DE-599)DOAJ4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng LC8-6691 Hakan Turkmen verfasserin aut Which One is Better? Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this study, the effect of using Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the subject of “Atoms-The Basic Unit of Matter” in science course of 6th grade on academic achievement was examined. Pre-test post-test control group research was used in the study. Study population is all secondary schools in Turgutlu district of Manisa province and the sample group was determined from “Samiye Nuri Sevil Secondary School” among 20 secondary schools in Turgutlu district through cluster sampling method. The experiment and control groups of the research were constituted from two branches based on the results of pre-test and there are 48 persons in total of which 24 are in experiment and 24 are in control group. In the study, the subject of “Atoms- the Basic Unit of Matter” was taught to the experiment group by using Jigsaw IV technique and it was taught to the control group by using Jigsaw II technique. In this research, Science achievement test consisting of 12 multiple-choice items which were developed by the researcher was used. T-test was used for the analysis of data obtained as a result of achievement test. In paired samples t-test (dependent group) conducted for achievement pre-tests and post-tests of the control and experiment group a significant difference was found, while no significant difference in terms of statistics in favor of the experiment group was found in independent samples t-test (independent group) conducted for post-tests of the control and experiment groups. At the end of the research, although the effect of Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the achievement in Science course was found to be positive on students learning, no statistical differences were found in these two techniques. cooperative learning, jigsaw ii technique, jigsaw iv technique Education L Special aspects of education Didem Buyukaltay verfasserin aut In Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health Seyit Ahmet Kıray, 2020 1(2015), 2, Seite 88-94 (DE-627)1760636819 2149214X nnns volume:1 year:2015 number:2 pages:88-94 https://doaj.org/article/4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694 kostenfrei https://jeseh.net/index.php/jeseh/article/view/9 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2149-214X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2015 2 88-94 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ040943003 (DE-599)DOAJ4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng LC8-6691 Hakan Turkmen verfasserin aut Which One is Better? Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this study, the effect of using Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the subject of “Atoms-The Basic Unit of Matter” in science course of 6th grade on academic achievement was examined. Pre-test post-test control group research was used in the study. Study population is all secondary schools in Turgutlu district of Manisa province and the sample group was determined from “Samiye Nuri Sevil Secondary School” among 20 secondary schools in Turgutlu district through cluster sampling method. The experiment and control groups of the research were constituted from two branches based on the results of pre-test and there are 48 persons in total of which 24 are in experiment and 24 are in control group. In the study, the subject of “Atoms- the Basic Unit of Matter” was taught to the experiment group by using Jigsaw IV technique and it was taught to the control group by using Jigsaw II technique. In this research, Science achievement test consisting of 12 multiple-choice items which were developed by the researcher was used. T-test was used for the analysis of data obtained as a result of achievement test. In paired samples t-test (dependent group) conducted for achievement pre-tests and post-tests of the control and experiment group a significant difference was found, while no significant difference in terms of statistics in favor of the experiment group was found in independent samples t-test (independent group) conducted for post-tests of the control and experiment groups. At the end of the research, although the effect of Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the achievement in Science course was found to be positive on students learning, no statistical differences were found in these two techniques. cooperative learning, jigsaw ii technique, jigsaw iv technique Education L Special aspects of education Didem Buyukaltay verfasserin aut In Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health Seyit Ahmet Kıray, 2020 1(2015), 2, Seite 88-94 (DE-627)1760636819 2149214X nnns volume:1 year:2015 number:2 pages:88-94 https://doaj.org/article/4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694 kostenfrei https://jeseh.net/index.php/jeseh/article/view/9 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2149-214X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2015 2 88-94 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health 1(2015), 2, Seite 88-94 volume:1 year:2015 number:2 pages:88-94 |
| sourceStr |
In Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health 1(2015), 2, Seite 88-94 volume:1 year:2015 number:2 pages:88-94 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
cooperative learning, jigsaw ii technique, jigsaw iv technique Education L Special aspects of education |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Hakan Turkmen @@aut@@ Didem Buyukaltay @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760636819 |
| id |
DOAJ040943003 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ040943003</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310182430.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ040943003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">LC8-6691</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hakan Turkmen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Which One is Better? Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this study, the effect of using Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the subject of “Atoms-The Basic Unit of Matter” in science course of 6th grade on academic achievement was examined. Pre-test post-test control group research was used in the study. Study population is all secondary schools in Turgutlu district of Manisa province and the sample group was determined from “Samiye Nuri Sevil Secondary School” among 20 secondary schools in Turgutlu district through cluster sampling method. The experiment and control groups of the research were constituted from two branches based on the results of pre-test and there are 48 persons in total of which 24 are in experiment and 24 are in control group. In the study, the subject of “Atoms- the Basic Unit of Matter” was taught to the experiment group by using Jigsaw IV technique and it was taught to the control group by using Jigsaw II technique. In this research, Science achievement test consisting of 12 multiple-choice items which were developed by the researcher was used. T-test was used for the analysis of data obtained as a result of achievement test. In paired samples t-test (dependent group) conducted for achievement pre-tests and post-tests of the control and experiment group a significant difference was found, while no significant difference in terms of statistics in favor of the experiment group was found in independent samples t-test (independent group) conducted for post-tests of the control and experiment groups. At the end of the research, although the effect of Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the achievement in Science course was found to be positive on students learning, no statistical differences were found in these two techniques.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cooperative learning, jigsaw ii technique, jigsaw iv technique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">L</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Special aspects of education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Didem Buyukaltay</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health</subfield><subfield code="d">Seyit Ahmet Kıray, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2015), 2, Seite 88-94</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760636819</subfield><subfield code="x">2149214X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:88-94</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://jeseh.net/index.php/jeseh/article/view/9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2149-214X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">88-94</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
L - Education |
| author |
Hakan Turkmen |
| spellingShingle |
Hakan Turkmen misc LC8-6691 misc cooperative learning, jigsaw ii technique, jigsaw iv technique misc Education misc L misc Special aspects of education Which One is Better? Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom |
| authorStr |
Hakan Turkmen |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760636819 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
LC8-6691 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
2149214X |
| topic_title |
LC8-6691 Which One is Better? Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom cooperative learning, jigsaw ii technique, jigsaw iv technique |
| topic |
misc LC8-6691 misc cooperative learning, jigsaw ii technique, jigsaw iv technique misc Education misc L misc Special aspects of education |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc LC8-6691 misc cooperative learning, jigsaw ii technique, jigsaw iv technique misc Education misc L misc Special aspects of education |
| topic_browse |
misc LC8-6691 misc cooperative learning, jigsaw ii technique, jigsaw iv technique misc Education misc L misc Special aspects of education |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760636819 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760636819 |
| title |
Which One is Better? Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ040943003 (DE-599)DOAJ4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694 |
| title_full |
Which One is Better? Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom |
| author_sort |
Hakan Turkmen |
| journal |
Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health |
| journalStr |
Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health |
| callnumber-first-code |
L |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
88 |
| author_browse |
Hakan Turkmen Didem Buyukaltay |
| container_volume |
1 |
| class |
LC8-6691 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Hakan Turkmen |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
which one is better? jigsaw ii versus jigsaw iv on the subject of the building blocks of matter and atom |
| callnumber |
LC8-6691 |
| title_auth |
Which One is Better? Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom |
| abstract |
In this study, the effect of using Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the subject of “Atoms-The Basic Unit of Matter” in science course of 6th grade on academic achievement was examined. Pre-test post-test control group research was used in the study. Study population is all secondary schools in Turgutlu district of Manisa province and the sample group was determined from “Samiye Nuri Sevil Secondary School” among 20 secondary schools in Turgutlu district through cluster sampling method. The experiment and control groups of the research were constituted from two branches based on the results of pre-test and there are 48 persons in total of which 24 are in experiment and 24 are in control group. In the study, the subject of “Atoms- the Basic Unit of Matter” was taught to the experiment group by using Jigsaw IV technique and it was taught to the control group by using Jigsaw II technique. In this research, Science achievement test consisting of 12 multiple-choice items which were developed by the researcher was used. T-test was used for the analysis of data obtained as a result of achievement test. In paired samples t-test (dependent group) conducted for achievement pre-tests and post-tests of the control and experiment group a significant difference was found, while no significant difference in terms of statistics in favor of the experiment group was found in independent samples t-test (independent group) conducted for post-tests of the control and experiment groups. At the end of the research, although the effect of Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the achievement in Science course was found to be positive on students learning, no statistical differences were found in these two techniques. |
| abstractGer |
In this study, the effect of using Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the subject of “Atoms-The Basic Unit of Matter” in science course of 6th grade on academic achievement was examined. Pre-test post-test control group research was used in the study. Study population is all secondary schools in Turgutlu district of Manisa province and the sample group was determined from “Samiye Nuri Sevil Secondary School” among 20 secondary schools in Turgutlu district through cluster sampling method. The experiment and control groups of the research were constituted from two branches based on the results of pre-test and there are 48 persons in total of which 24 are in experiment and 24 are in control group. In the study, the subject of “Atoms- the Basic Unit of Matter” was taught to the experiment group by using Jigsaw IV technique and it was taught to the control group by using Jigsaw II technique. In this research, Science achievement test consisting of 12 multiple-choice items which were developed by the researcher was used. T-test was used for the analysis of data obtained as a result of achievement test. In paired samples t-test (dependent group) conducted for achievement pre-tests and post-tests of the control and experiment group a significant difference was found, while no significant difference in terms of statistics in favor of the experiment group was found in independent samples t-test (independent group) conducted for post-tests of the control and experiment groups. At the end of the research, although the effect of Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the achievement in Science course was found to be positive on students learning, no statistical differences were found in these two techniques. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In this study, the effect of using Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the subject of “Atoms-The Basic Unit of Matter” in science course of 6th grade on academic achievement was examined. Pre-test post-test control group research was used in the study. Study population is all secondary schools in Turgutlu district of Manisa province and the sample group was determined from “Samiye Nuri Sevil Secondary School” among 20 secondary schools in Turgutlu district through cluster sampling method. The experiment and control groups of the research were constituted from two branches based on the results of pre-test and there are 48 persons in total of which 24 are in experiment and 24 are in control group. In the study, the subject of “Atoms- the Basic Unit of Matter” was taught to the experiment group by using Jigsaw IV technique and it was taught to the control group by using Jigsaw II technique. In this research, Science achievement test consisting of 12 multiple-choice items which were developed by the researcher was used. T-test was used for the analysis of data obtained as a result of achievement test. In paired samples t-test (dependent group) conducted for achievement pre-tests and post-tests of the control and experiment group a significant difference was found, while no significant difference in terms of statistics in favor of the experiment group was found in independent samples t-test (independent group) conducted for post-tests of the control and experiment groups. At the end of the research, although the effect of Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the achievement in Science course was found to be positive on students learning, no statistical differences were found in these two techniques. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Which One is Better? Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694 https://jeseh.net/index.php/jeseh/article/view/9 https://doaj.org/toc/2149-214X |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Didem Buyukaltay |
| author2Str |
Didem Buyukaltay |
| ppnlink |
1760636819 |
| callnumber-subject |
LC - Social Aspects of Education |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| callnumber-a |
LC8-6691 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T17:35:45.598Z |
| _version_ |
1803580232799617024 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ040943003</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310182430.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ040943003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">LC8-6691</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hakan Turkmen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Which One is Better? Jigsaw II Versus Jigsaw IV on the Subject of the Building Blocks of Matter and Atom</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this study, the effect of using Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the subject of “Atoms-The Basic Unit of Matter” in science course of 6th grade on academic achievement was examined. Pre-test post-test control group research was used in the study. Study population is all secondary schools in Turgutlu district of Manisa province and the sample group was determined from “Samiye Nuri Sevil Secondary School” among 20 secondary schools in Turgutlu district through cluster sampling method. The experiment and control groups of the research were constituted from two branches based on the results of pre-test and there are 48 persons in total of which 24 are in experiment and 24 are in control group. In the study, the subject of “Atoms- the Basic Unit of Matter” was taught to the experiment group by using Jigsaw IV technique and it was taught to the control group by using Jigsaw II technique. In this research, Science achievement test consisting of 12 multiple-choice items which were developed by the researcher was used. T-test was used for the analysis of data obtained as a result of achievement test. In paired samples t-test (dependent group) conducted for achievement pre-tests and post-tests of the control and experiment group a significant difference was found, while no significant difference in terms of statistics in favor of the experiment group was found in independent samples t-test (independent group) conducted for post-tests of the control and experiment groups. At the end of the research, although the effect of Jigsaw II and Jigsaw IV techniques on the achievement in Science course was found to be positive on students learning, no statistical differences were found in these two techniques.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cooperative learning, jigsaw ii technique, jigsaw iv technique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">L</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Special aspects of education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Didem Buyukaltay</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health</subfield><subfield code="d">Seyit Ahmet Kıray, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2015), 2, Seite 88-94</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760636819</subfield><subfield code="x">2149214X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:88-94</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4043c528e1a44a768ed9a79378a58694</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://jeseh.net/index.php/jeseh/article/view/9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2149-214X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">88-94</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3998938 |