A Study of the Relationship between Mulla Sadra's " Extra-Intellectual Order" and Kierkegaard's "Sphere of Religion"
Is there a domain beyond the illogical intellect whose statements are antirational? This question has always called gnosticism to encounter rationalism. Thus, gnostics, gnosticologists, and religionologists in both Christian west and Islamic east have always paid attention to intellect and the extr...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Mahmoud Reza Sadraei [verfasserIn] Abbas Hajiha [verfasserIn] Akbar Goli Malekabadi [verfasserIn] Seyyed ali alamolhoda Alamolhoda [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Persisch |
Erschienen: |
2016 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Comparative Theology - University of Isfahan, 2013, 7(2016), 16, Seite 87-100 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:7 ; year:2016 ; number:16 ; pages:87-100 |
Links: |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ041248279 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ041248279 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230308044845.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230227s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||per c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ041248279 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a per | ||
050 | 0 | |a BT10-1480 | |
100 | 0 | |a Mahmoud Reza Sadraei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Study of the Relationship between Mulla Sadra's " Extra-Intellectual Order" and Kierkegaard's "Sphere of Religion" |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Is there a domain beyond the illogical intellect whose statements are antirational? This question has always called gnosticism to encounter rationalism. Thus, gnostics, gnosticologists, and religionologists in both Christian west and Islamic east have always paid attention to intellect and the extraintellectual order, and to the possible relationthip between them. Mulla Sadra believed that neither the statements of the intellect are invalid in the extraintellectual order, nor the statements of the latter in the former. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, in his notion of human life stages, has labeled them as esthetic, ethical, and religious. In his view, the religious domain is extra-rational and extra-ethical. In an analytic process, Mulla Sadra has classified the implications and applications of the word "intellect". In his view, intellect is present in overall human domains and no order of humanity is void of the power of reason. Additionally, in epistemological terms, intellect cannot be in conflict with other components when opining within the domain of its own and its cognitive findings; and does not proscribe its ulterior. In other words, errors emerge in the stage of intellect's decreeing, not in the stage of senses' and intuition's reporting . Now the intellect itself is able to recognize its limits, admit ignorance, and lead the humanity to the boundaries of extra-rational matters. In Mulla Sadra's view, the epistemological and cognitive domain of extraintellectual order and the complexity of knowledge within this domain are not accessible to the intellect, being otherwise (e.g., through heart or revelation) achievable by humans. In Kierkegaard's view, intellect as human capacity of thought is annexative; and experiences and attitudes acquired in relation to the existence have formed human intellect; and the boundary sought by the intellect is, in a sense, the very purpose or objective of the intellect. With his partiality toward faith, Kierkegaard is a known to be a harsh critic of rationalism. He wants to remind his readers of limitations of human reason. Placing faith in the center of Christian thinking, he believed that intellect has no role in religious creed; and that the object of faith has to be paradoxical. Without submission to the paradoxical, the necessary passion and the ground for decision would not be peovided. Submitting to the paradoxical, a passionate human being displays his/her exyreme passion and commitment to the object of his/her faith, which is a paradox, and paradoxical as much as the paradox itself. In Kierkegaard's view, the void arising from the inconsistency of two discrete, and at the same time, subsequent issues (ethical and religious life) is filled by an existential issue, namely deapair. Such a despair, he argues, is an existential process swallowing the entire individual existence and is the result of paradoxes and substantial impasses that an individual faces within the extant conditions of his/her own life, becoming the turning point where a human being is detached fron morality and adjoins religion. Such a despair is deliberaye and chosen. Humans cannot be desperate without spliciting despair. When resolving it correctly, an individual would go beyond it righteously. In Islamic view, however, faith is not an anti rational category. In Mulla Sadra's view, faith is inclusive of instinctive knowledge and intuitive knowledge. Faith has various grades, one being intuitive. Another grade is the knowledge of God through argumentative comparison. Although faith is a matter of heart/instinct, the heartfelt/instinctive faith is not exclusive to exploratory knowledge; and knowledge of God through reasoning and arguments could be considered heartfelt/inatinctive faith. He tries to reconcile intellect and religion; or in other words, gnosticism and argumentation. In his specific semantic analytic method, Mulla Sadra links elements seemingly not directly related to the concept of faith to it, even calling them equivalents. He restructures other concepts such as light, science, wisdom, and intellect into a new superior framework, renarrating the theological concept of faith using Koranic, gnostic, and philosophical literature. That's why he tries to make an aperure between intellect and heart when reaching the topic of extraintellectual order. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, raises the issue of paradox when reaching the third stage of life or the sphere of religion in his methodological model. He concludes that the sphere of religion, and entry to the stage of faith is based on existenz and has no relevance to the conceptual existence and the concept of existence, but some sort of unity is realized between it an the authentic exterior existence; and even, one has to say, faith is the same as the existenz; and what he refers to as "extra-religion" is an extraintellectual order. In his view, the process of faith requires detention of intellect, which, of course, does not imply the omission and negation of intellect. Nulla Sadra, however, with his interpretation of extra intellectual order, accepts the fact that it's statements are not accessible to the intellect and the latter is incapable of fathoming then does not imply that if a human being reaches an understanding of extra intellectual order using other means than rationality, logics, and conceptual, influential methods, the intellect will be deaf and blind toward such an understanding. He believes that the statements of the extra intellectual order are not within the intellect's domain of comprehension but in another domain are known as heartfelt /instinctive knowledge. In fact, he denies the alienation of heart and mind because in his view, psyche has a transcendental essence and a collective unity. Therefore, he does not consider heart and mind as mutually exclusive; and that intellect does not deem impossible the heart's intuitions. His interpretations of extra intellectual order are based on his specific view of intellect and Islamic anthropology. However, when Kierkegaard considers the sphere of religion as irrational, he provides a specific conception of humanity contradicting that of Nulla Sadra because he portrays human beings as completely separate and aliens to one another as an archipelago. In fact, he closes all windows between intellect and heart when stating that in the extra intellectual order, the plunge is relevant, not rationalization. Hence the separation between Mulla Sadra's and Kierkegaard's thoughts. They both accept that intellect is not a complete source of knowledge for fathoming the truth. Faced with the paradox in the sphere of religion, Kierkegaard prescribed the detention of intellect. Mulla Sadra's, on the other hand, considers coordinated and consistent the perceptual realms and knowledge domains in both areas of intellect and the extra intellectual order beyond it. Kierkegaard is a life thinker who has considered the sphere of religion to beyond beyond ethics, intellect, and esthetics in his categorization of life stages. In both their views, the sphere of religion and extra intellectual order have a mysterious and allegorical identity; an allegory which is not a poetic, literary lingo, but a specific way of thinking and a specific method for achieving knowledge. This paper tries to examine the similarities and dissimilarities of those two ways of living, namely, the sphere of religion and the extra intellectual order in the views of the two great thinkers who have developed them. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Beyond Intellect | |
650 | 4 | |a Intellect | |
650 | 4 | |a Paradox | |
653 | 0 | |a Philosophy. Psychology. Religion | |
653 | 0 | |a B | |
653 | 0 | |a Doctrinal Theology | |
700 | 0 | |a Abbas Hajiha |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Akbar Goli Malekabadi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Seyyed ali alamolhoda Alamolhoda |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Comparative Theology |d University of Isfahan, 2013 |g 7(2016), 16, Seite 87-100 |w (DE-627)1029195846 |x 23223421 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:2016 |g number:16 |g pages:87-100 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://coth.ui.ac.ir/article_20771_a61b6b2a7422542c7a03bc389a407784.pdf |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2008-9651 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2322-3421 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2036 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 7 |j 2016 |e 16 |h 87-100 |
author_variant |
m r s mrs a h ah a g m agm s a a a saaa |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:23223421:2016----::suyfhrltosibtenulsdaetanelculreadi |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
callnumber-subject-code |
BT |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ041248279 (DE-599)DOAJ2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per BT10-1480 Mahmoud Reza Sadraei verfasserin aut A Study of the Relationship between Mulla Sadra's " Extra-Intellectual Order" and Kierkegaard's "Sphere of Religion" 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Is there a domain beyond the illogical intellect whose statements are antirational? This question has always called gnosticism to encounter rationalism. Thus, gnostics, gnosticologists, and religionologists in both Christian west and Islamic east have always paid attention to intellect and the extraintellectual order, and to the possible relationthip between them. Mulla Sadra believed that neither the statements of the intellect are invalid in the extraintellectual order, nor the statements of the latter in the former. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, in his notion of human life stages, has labeled them as esthetic, ethical, and religious. In his view, the religious domain is extra-rational and extra-ethical. In an analytic process, Mulla Sadra has classified the implications and applications of the word "intellect". In his view, intellect is present in overall human domains and no order of humanity is void of the power of reason. Additionally, in epistemological terms, intellect cannot be in conflict with other components when opining within the domain of its own and its cognitive findings; and does not proscribe its ulterior. In other words, errors emerge in the stage of intellect's decreeing, not in the stage of senses' and intuition's reporting . Now the intellect itself is able to recognize its limits, admit ignorance, and lead the humanity to the boundaries of extra-rational matters. In Mulla Sadra's view, the epistemological and cognitive domain of extraintellectual order and the complexity of knowledge within this domain are not accessible to the intellect, being otherwise (e.g., through heart or revelation) achievable by humans. In Kierkegaard's view, intellect as human capacity of thought is annexative; and experiences and attitudes acquired in relation to the existence have formed human intellect; and the boundary sought by the intellect is, in a sense, the very purpose or objective of the intellect. With his partiality toward faith, Kierkegaard is a known to be a harsh critic of rationalism. He wants to remind his readers of limitations of human reason. Placing faith in the center of Christian thinking, he believed that intellect has no role in religious creed; and that the object of faith has to be paradoxical. Without submission to the paradoxical, the necessary passion and the ground for decision would not be peovided. Submitting to the paradoxical, a passionate human being displays his/her exyreme passion and commitment to the object of his/her faith, which is a paradox, and paradoxical as much as the paradox itself. In Kierkegaard's view, the void arising from the inconsistency of two discrete, and at the same time, subsequent issues (ethical and religious life) is filled by an existential issue, namely deapair. Such a despair, he argues, is an existential process swallowing the entire individual existence and is the result of paradoxes and substantial impasses that an individual faces within the extant conditions of his/her own life, becoming the turning point where a human being is detached fron morality and adjoins religion. Such a despair is deliberaye and chosen. Humans cannot be desperate without spliciting despair. When resolving it correctly, an individual would go beyond it righteously. In Islamic view, however, faith is not an anti rational category. In Mulla Sadra's view, faith is inclusive of instinctive knowledge and intuitive knowledge. Faith has various grades, one being intuitive. Another grade is the knowledge of God through argumentative comparison. Although faith is a matter of heart/instinct, the heartfelt/instinctive faith is not exclusive to exploratory knowledge; and knowledge of God through reasoning and arguments could be considered heartfelt/inatinctive faith. He tries to reconcile intellect and religion; or in other words, gnosticism and argumentation. In his specific semantic analytic method, Mulla Sadra links elements seemingly not directly related to the concept of faith to it, even calling them equivalents. He restructures other concepts such as light, science, wisdom, and intellect into a new superior framework, renarrating the theological concept of faith using Koranic, gnostic, and philosophical literature. That's why he tries to make an aperure between intellect and heart when reaching the topic of extraintellectual order. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, raises the issue of paradox when reaching the third stage of life or the sphere of religion in his methodological model. He concludes that the sphere of religion, and entry to the stage of faith is based on existenz and has no relevance to the conceptual existence and the concept of existence, but some sort of unity is realized between it an the authentic exterior existence; and even, one has to say, faith is the same as the existenz; and what he refers to as "extra-religion" is an extraintellectual order. In his view, the process of faith requires detention of intellect, which, of course, does not imply the omission and negation of intellect. Nulla Sadra, however, with his interpretation of extra intellectual order, accepts the fact that it's statements are not accessible to the intellect and the latter is incapable of fathoming then does not imply that if a human being reaches an understanding of extra intellectual order using other means than rationality, logics, and conceptual, influential methods, the intellect will be deaf and blind toward such an understanding. He believes that the statements of the extra intellectual order are not within the intellect's domain of comprehension but in another domain are known as heartfelt /instinctive knowledge. In fact, he denies the alienation of heart and mind because in his view, psyche has a transcendental essence and a collective unity. Therefore, he does not consider heart and mind as mutually exclusive; and that intellect does not deem impossible the heart's intuitions. His interpretations of extra intellectual order are based on his specific view of intellect and Islamic anthropology. However, when Kierkegaard considers the sphere of religion as irrational, he provides a specific conception of humanity contradicting that of Nulla Sadra because he portrays human beings as completely separate and aliens to one another as an archipelago. In fact, he closes all windows between intellect and heart when stating that in the extra intellectual order, the plunge is relevant, not rationalization. Hence the separation between Mulla Sadra's and Kierkegaard's thoughts. They both accept that intellect is not a complete source of knowledge for fathoming the truth. Faced with the paradox in the sphere of religion, Kierkegaard prescribed the detention of intellect. Mulla Sadra's, on the other hand, considers coordinated and consistent the perceptual realms and knowledge domains in both areas of intellect and the extra intellectual order beyond it. Kierkegaard is a life thinker who has considered the sphere of religion to beyond beyond ethics, intellect, and esthetics in his categorization of life stages. In both their views, the sphere of religion and extra intellectual order have a mysterious and allegorical identity; an allegory which is not a poetic, literary lingo, but a specific way of thinking and a specific method for achieving knowledge. This paper tries to examine the similarities and dissimilarities of those two ways of living, namely, the sphere of religion and the extra intellectual order in the views of the two great thinkers who have developed them. Beyond Intellect Intellect Paradox Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B Doctrinal Theology Abbas Hajiha verfasserin aut Akbar Goli Malekabadi verfasserin aut Seyyed ali alamolhoda Alamolhoda verfasserin aut In Comparative Theology University of Isfahan, 2013 7(2016), 16, Seite 87-100 (DE-627)1029195846 23223421 nnns volume:7 year:2016 number:16 pages:87-100 https://doaj.org/article/2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322 kostenfrei http://coth.ui.ac.ir/article_20771_a61b6b2a7422542c7a03bc389a407784.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2008-9651 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2322-3421 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2036 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2016 16 87-100 |
spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ041248279 (DE-599)DOAJ2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per BT10-1480 Mahmoud Reza Sadraei verfasserin aut A Study of the Relationship between Mulla Sadra's " Extra-Intellectual Order" and Kierkegaard's "Sphere of Religion" 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Is there a domain beyond the illogical intellect whose statements are antirational? This question has always called gnosticism to encounter rationalism. Thus, gnostics, gnosticologists, and religionologists in both Christian west and Islamic east have always paid attention to intellect and the extraintellectual order, and to the possible relationthip between them. Mulla Sadra believed that neither the statements of the intellect are invalid in the extraintellectual order, nor the statements of the latter in the former. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, in his notion of human life stages, has labeled them as esthetic, ethical, and religious. In his view, the religious domain is extra-rational and extra-ethical. In an analytic process, Mulla Sadra has classified the implications and applications of the word "intellect". In his view, intellect is present in overall human domains and no order of humanity is void of the power of reason. Additionally, in epistemological terms, intellect cannot be in conflict with other components when opining within the domain of its own and its cognitive findings; and does not proscribe its ulterior. In other words, errors emerge in the stage of intellect's decreeing, not in the stage of senses' and intuition's reporting . Now the intellect itself is able to recognize its limits, admit ignorance, and lead the humanity to the boundaries of extra-rational matters. In Mulla Sadra's view, the epistemological and cognitive domain of extraintellectual order and the complexity of knowledge within this domain are not accessible to the intellect, being otherwise (e.g., through heart or revelation) achievable by humans. In Kierkegaard's view, intellect as human capacity of thought is annexative; and experiences and attitudes acquired in relation to the existence have formed human intellect; and the boundary sought by the intellect is, in a sense, the very purpose or objective of the intellect. With his partiality toward faith, Kierkegaard is a known to be a harsh critic of rationalism. He wants to remind his readers of limitations of human reason. Placing faith in the center of Christian thinking, he believed that intellect has no role in religious creed; and that the object of faith has to be paradoxical. Without submission to the paradoxical, the necessary passion and the ground for decision would not be peovided. Submitting to the paradoxical, a passionate human being displays his/her exyreme passion and commitment to the object of his/her faith, which is a paradox, and paradoxical as much as the paradox itself. In Kierkegaard's view, the void arising from the inconsistency of two discrete, and at the same time, subsequent issues (ethical and religious life) is filled by an existential issue, namely deapair. Such a despair, he argues, is an existential process swallowing the entire individual existence and is the result of paradoxes and substantial impasses that an individual faces within the extant conditions of his/her own life, becoming the turning point where a human being is detached fron morality and adjoins religion. Such a despair is deliberaye and chosen. Humans cannot be desperate without spliciting despair. When resolving it correctly, an individual would go beyond it righteously. In Islamic view, however, faith is not an anti rational category. In Mulla Sadra's view, faith is inclusive of instinctive knowledge and intuitive knowledge. Faith has various grades, one being intuitive. Another grade is the knowledge of God through argumentative comparison. Although faith is a matter of heart/instinct, the heartfelt/instinctive faith is not exclusive to exploratory knowledge; and knowledge of God through reasoning and arguments could be considered heartfelt/inatinctive faith. He tries to reconcile intellect and religion; or in other words, gnosticism and argumentation. In his specific semantic analytic method, Mulla Sadra links elements seemingly not directly related to the concept of faith to it, even calling them equivalents. He restructures other concepts such as light, science, wisdom, and intellect into a new superior framework, renarrating the theological concept of faith using Koranic, gnostic, and philosophical literature. That's why he tries to make an aperure between intellect and heart when reaching the topic of extraintellectual order. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, raises the issue of paradox when reaching the third stage of life or the sphere of religion in his methodological model. He concludes that the sphere of religion, and entry to the stage of faith is based on existenz and has no relevance to the conceptual existence and the concept of existence, but some sort of unity is realized between it an the authentic exterior existence; and even, one has to say, faith is the same as the existenz; and what he refers to as "extra-religion" is an extraintellectual order. In his view, the process of faith requires detention of intellect, which, of course, does not imply the omission and negation of intellect. Nulla Sadra, however, with his interpretation of extra intellectual order, accepts the fact that it's statements are not accessible to the intellect and the latter is incapable of fathoming then does not imply that if a human being reaches an understanding of extra intellectual order using other means than rationality, logics, and conceptual, influential methods, the intellect will be deaf and blind toward such an understanding. He believes that the statements of the extra intellectual order are not within the intellect's domain of comprehension but in another domain are known as heartfelt /instinctive knowledge. In fact, he denies the alienation of heart and mind because in his view, psyche has a transcendental essence and a collective unity. Therefore, he does not consider heart and mind as mutually exclusive; and that intellect does not deem impossible the heart's intuitions. His interpretations of extra intellectual order are based on his specific view of intellect and Islamic anthropology. However, when Kierkegaard considers the sphere of religion as irrational, he provides a specific conception of humanity contradicting that of Nulla Sadra because he portrays human beings as completely separate and aliens to one another as an archipelago. In fact, he closes all windows between intellect and heart when stating that in the extra intellectual order, the plunge is relevant, not rationalization. Hence the separation between Mulla Sadra's and Kierkegaard's thoughts. They both accept that intellect is not a complete source of knowledge for fathoming the truth. Faced with the paradox in the sphere of religion, Kierkegaard prescribed the detention of intellect. Mulla Sadra's, on the other hand, considers coordinated and consistent the perceptual realms and knowledge domains in both areas of intellect and the extra intellectual order beyond it. Kierkegaard is a life thinker who has considered the sphere of religion to beyond beyond ethics, intellect, and esthetics in his categorization of life stages. In both their views, the sphere of religion and extra intellectual order have a mysterious and allegorical identity; an allegory which is not a poetic, literary lingo, but a specific way of thinking and a specific method for achieving knowledge. This paper tries to examine the similarities and dissimilarities of those two ways of living, namely, the sphere of religion and the extra intellectual order in the views of the two great thinkers who have developed them. Beyond Intellect Intellect Paradox Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B Doctrinal Theology Abbas Hajiha verfasserin aut Akbar Goli Malekabadi verfasserin aut Seyyed ali alamolhoda Alamolhoda verfasserin aut In Comparative Theology University of Isfahan, 2013 7(2016), 16, Seite 87-100 (DE-627)1029195846 23223421 nnns volume:7 year:2016 number:16 pages:87-100 https://doaj.org/article/2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322 kostenfrei http://coth.ui.ac.ir/article_20771_a61b6b2a7422542c7a03bc389a407784.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2008-9651 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2322-3421 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2036 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2016 16 87-100 |
allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ041248279 (DE-599)DOAJ2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per BT10-1480 Mahmoud Reza Sadraei verfasserin aut A Study of the Relationship between Mulla Sadra's " Extra-Intellectual Order" and Kierkegaard's "Sphere of Religion" 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Is there a domain beyond the illogical intellect whose statements are antirational? This question has always called gnosticism to encounter rationalism. Thus, gnostics, gnosticologists, and religionologists in both Christian west and Islamic east have always paid attention to intellect and the extraintellectual order, and to the possible relationthip between them. Mulla Sadra believed that neither the statements of the intellect are invalid in the extraintellectual order, nor the statements of the latter in the former. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, in his notion of human life stages, has labeled them as esthetic, ethical, and religious. In his view, the religious domain is extra-rational and extra-ethical. In an analytic process, Mulla Sadra has classified the implications and applications of the word "intellect". In his view, intellect is present in overall human domains and no order of humanity is void of the power of reason. Additionally, in epistemological terms, intellect cannot be in conflict with other components when opining within the domain of its own and its cognitive findings; and does not proscribe its ulterior. In other words, errors emerge in the stage of intellect's decreeing, not in the stage of senses' and intuition's reporting . Now the intellect itself is able to recognize its limits, admit ignorance, and lead the humanity to the boundaries of extra-rational matters. In Mulla Sadra's view, the epistemological and cognitive domain of extraintellectual order and the complexity of knowledge within this domain are not accessible to the intellect, being otherwise (e.g., through heart or revelation) achievable by humans. In Kierkegaard's view, intellect as human capacity of thought is annexative; and experiences and attitudes acquired in relation to the existence have formed human intellect; and the boundary sought by the intellect is, in a sense, the very purpose or objective of the intellect. With his partiality toward faith, Kierkegaard is a known to be a harsh critic of rationalism. He wants to remind his readers of limitations of human reason. Placing faith in the center of Christian thinking, he believed that intellect has no role in religious creed; and that the object of faith has to be paradoxical. Without submission to the paradoxical, the necessary passion and the ground for decision would not be peovided. Submitting to the paradoxical, a passionate human being displays his/her exyreme passion and commitment to the object of his/her faith, which is a paradox, and paradoxical as much as the paradox itself. In Kierkegaard's view, the void arising from the inconsistency of two discrete, and at the same time, subsequent issues (ethical and religious life) is filled by an existential issue, namely deapair. Such a despair, he argues, is an existential process swallowing the entire individual existence and is the result of paradoxes and substantial impasses that an individual faces within the extant conditions of his/her own life, becoming the turning point where a human being is detached fron morality and adjoins religion. Such a despair is deliberaye and chosen. Humans cannot be desperate without spliciting despair. When resolving it correctly, an individual would go beyond it righteously. In Islamic view, however, faith is not an anti rational category. In Mulla Sadra's view, faith is inclusive of instinctive knowledge and intuitive knowledge. Faith has various grades, one being intuitive. Another grade is the knowledge of God through argumentative comparison. Although faith is a matter of heart/instinct, the heartfelt/instinctive faith is not exclusive to exploratory knowledge; and knowledge of God through reasoning and arguments could be considered heartfelt/inatinctive faith. He tries to reconcile intellect and religion; or in other words, gnosticism and argumentation. In his specific semantic analytic method, Mulla Sadra links elements seemingly not directly related to the concept of faith to it, even calling them equivalents. He restructures other concepts such as light, science, wisdom, and intellect into a new superior framework, renarrating the theological concept of faith using Koranic, gnostic, and philosophical literature. That's why he tries to make an aperure between intellect and heart when reaching the topic of extraintellectual order. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, raises the issue of paradox when reaching the third stage of life or the sphere of religion in his methodological model. He concludes that the sphere of religion, and entry to the stage of faith is based on existenz and has no relevance to the conceptual existence and the concept of existence, but some sort of unity is realized between it an the authentic exterior existence; and even, one has to say, faith is the same as the existenz; and what he refers to as "extra-religion" is an extraintellectual order. In his view, the process of faith requires detention of intellect, which, of course, does not imply the omission and negation of intellect. Nulla Sadra, however, with his interpretation of extra intellectual order, accepts the fact that it's statements are not accessible to the intellect and the latter is incapable of fathoming then does not imply that if a human being reaches an understanding of extra intellectual order using other means than rationality, logics, and conceptual, influential methods, the intellect will be deaf and blind toward such an understanding. He believes that the statements of the extra intellectual order are not within the intellect's domain of comprehension but in another domain are known as heartfelt /instinctive knowledge. In fact, he denies the alienation of heart and mind because in his view, psyche has a transcendental essence and a collective unity. Therefore, he does not consider heart and mind as mutually exclusive; and that intellect does not deem impossible the heart's intuitions. His interpretations of extra intellectual order are based on his specific view of intellect and Islamic anthropology. However, when Kierkegaard considers the sphere of religion as irrational, he provides a specific conception of humanity contradicting that of Nulla Sadra because he portrays human beings as completely separate and aliens to one another as an archipelago. In fact, he closes all windows between intellect and heart when stating that in the extra intellectual order, the plunge is relevant, not rationalization. Hence the separation between Mulla Sadra's and Kierkegaard's thoughts. They both accept that intellect is not a complete source of knowledge for fathoming the truth. Faced with the paradox in the sphere of religion, Kierkegaard prescribed the detention of intellect. Mulla Sadra's, on the other hand, considers coordinated and consistent the perceptual realms and knowledge domains in both areas of intellect and the extra intellectual order beyond it. Kierkegaard is a life thinker who has considered the sphere of religion to beyond beyond ethics, intellect, and esthetics in his categorization of life stages. In both their views, the sphere of religion and extra intellectual order have a mysterious and allegorical identity; an allegory which is not a poetic, literary lingo, but a specific way of thinking and a specific method for achieving knowledge. This paper tries to examine the similarities and dissimilarities of those two ways of living, namely, the sphere of religion and the extra intellectual order in the views of the two great thinkers who have developed them. Beyond Intellect Intellect Paradox Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B Doctrinal Theology Abbas Hajiha verfasserin aut Akbar Goli Malekabadi verfasserin aut Seyyed ali alamolhoda Alamolhoda verfasserin aut In Comparative Theology University of Isfahan, 2013 7(2016), 16, Seite 87-100 (DE-627)1029195846 23223421 nnns volume:7 year:2016 number:16 pages:87-100 https://doaj.org/article/2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322 kostenfrei http://coth.ui.ac.ir/article_20771_a61b6b2a7422542c7a03bc389a407784.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2008-9651 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2322-3421 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2036 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2016 16 87-100 |
allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ041248279 (DE-599)DOAJ2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per BT10-1480 Mahmoud Reza Sadraei verfasserin aut A Study of the Relationship between Mulla Sadra's " Extra-Intellectual Order" and Kierkegaard's "Sphere of Religion" 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Is there a domain beyond the illogical intellect whose statements are antirational? This question has always called gnosticism to encounter rationalism. Thus, gnostics, gnosticologists, and religionologists in both Christian west and Islamic east have always paid attention to intellect and the extraintellectual order, and to the possible relationthip between them. Mulla Sadra believed that neither the statements of the intellect are invalid in the extraintellectual order, nor the statements of the latter in the former. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, in his notion of human life stages, has labeled them as esthetic, ethical, and religious. In his view, the religious domain is extra-rational and extra-ethical. In an analytic process, Mulla Sadra has classified the implications and applications of the word "intellect". In his view, intellect is present in overall human domains and no order of humanity is void of the power of reason. Additionally, in epistemological terms, intellect cannot be in conflict with other components when opining within the domain of its own and its cognitive findings; and does not proscribe its ulterior. In other words, errors emerge in the stage of intellect's decreeing, not in the stage of senses' and intuition's reporting . Now the intellect itself is able to recognize its limits, admit ignorance, and lead the humanity to the boundaries of extra-rational matters. In Mulla Sadra's view, the epistemological and cognitive domain of extraintellectual order and the complexity of knowledge within this domain are not accessible to the intellect, being otherwise (e.g., through heart or revelation) achievable by humans. In Kierkegaard's view, intellect as human capacity of thought is annexative; and experiences and attitudes acquired in relation to the existence have formed human intellect; and the boundary sought by the intellect is, in a sense, the very purpose or objective of the intellect. With his partiality toward faith, Kierkegaard is a known to be a harsh critic of rationalism. He wants to remind his readers of limitations of human reason. Placing faith in the center of Christian thinking, he believed that intellect has no role in religious creed; and that the object of faith has to be paradoxical. Without submission to the paradoxical, the necessary passion and the ground for decision would not be peovided. Submitting to the paradoxical, a passionate human being displays his/her exyreme passion and commitment to the object of his/her faith, which is a paradox, and paradoxical as much as the paradox itself. In Kierkegaard's view, the void arising from the inconsistency of two discrete, and at the same time, subsequent issues (ethical and religious life) is filled by an existential issue, namely deapair. Such a despair, he argues, is an existential process swallowing the entire individual existence and is the result of paradoxes and substantial impasses that an individual faces within the extant conditions of his/her own life, becoming the turning point where a human being is detached fron morality and adjoins religion. Such a despair is deliberaye and chosen. Humans cannot be desperate without spliciting despair. When resolving it correctly, an individual would go beyond it righteously. In Islamic view, however, faith is not an anti rational category. In Mulla Sadra's view, faith is inclusive of instinctive knowledge and intuitive knowledge. Faith has various grades, one being intuitive. Another grade is the knowledge of God through argumentative comparison. Although faith is a matter of heart/instinct, the heartfelt/instinctive faith is not exclusive to exploratory knowledge; and knowledge of God through reasoning and arguments could be considered heartfelt/inatinctive faith. He tries to reconcile intellect and religion; or in other words, gnosticism and argumentation. In his specific semantic analytic method, Mulla Sadra links elements seemingly not directly related to the concept of faith to it, even calling them equivalents. He restructures other concepts such as light, science, wisdom, and intellect into a new superior framework, renarrating the theological concept of faith using Koranic, gnostic, and philosophical literature. That's why he tries to make an aperure between intellect and heart when reaching the topic of extraintellectual order. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, raises the issue of paradox when reaching the third stage of life or the sphere of religion in his methodological model. He concludes that the sphere of religion, and entry to the stage of faith is based on existenz and has no relevance to the conceptual existence and the concept of existence, but some sort of unity is realized between it an the authentic exterior existence; and even, one has to say, faith is the same as the existenz; and what he refers to as "extra-religion" is an extraintellectual order. In his view, the process of faith requires detention of intellect, which, of course, does not imply the omission and negation of intellect. Nulla Sadra, however, with his interpretation of extra intellectual order, accepts the fact that it's statements are not accessible to the intellect and the latter is incapable of fathoming then does not imply that if a human being reaches an understanding of extra intellectual order using other means than rationality, logics, and conceptual, influential methods, the intellect will be deaf and blind toward such an understanding. He believes that the statements of the extra intellectual order are not within the intellect's domain of comprehension but in another domain are known as heartfelt /instinctive knowledge. In fact, he denies the alienation of heart and mind because in his view, psyche has a transcendental essence and a collective unity. Therefore, he does not consider heart and mind as mutually exclusive; and that intellect does not deem impossible the heart's intuitions. His interpretations of extra intellectual order are based on his specific view of intellect and Islamic anthropology. However, when Kierkegaard considers the sphere of religion as irrational, he provides a specific conception of humanity contradicting that of Nulla Sadra because he portrays human beings as completely separate and aliens to one another as an archipelago. In fact, he closes all windows between intellect and heart when stating that in the extra intellectual order, the plunge is relevant, not rationalization. Hence the separation between Mulla Sadra's and Kierkegaard's thoughts. They both accept that intellect is not a complete source of knowledge for fathoming the truth. Faced with the paradox in the sphere of religion, Kierkegaard prescribed the detention of intellect. Mulla Sadra's, on the other hand, considers coordinated and consistent the perceptual realms and knowledge domains in both areas of intellect and the extra intellectual order beyond it. Kierkegaard is a life thinker who has considered the sphere of religion to beyond beyond ethics, intellect, and esthetics in his categorization of life stages. In both their views, the sphere of religion and extra intellectual order have a mysterious and allegorical identity; an allegory which is not a poetic, literary lingo, but a specific way of thinking and a specific method for achieving knowledge. This paper tries to examine the similarities and dissimilarities of those two ways of living, namely, the sphere of religion and the extra intellectual order in the views of the two great thinkers who have developed them. Beyond Intellect Intellect Paradox Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B Doctrinal Theology Abbas Hajiha verfasserin aut Akbar Goli Malekabadi verfasserin aut Seyyed ali alamolhoda Alamolhoda verfasserin aut In Comparative Theology University of Isfahan, 2013 7(2016), 16, Seite 87-100 (DE-627)1029195846 23223421 nnns volume:7 year:2016 number:16 pages:87-100 https://doaj.org/article/2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322 kostenfrei http://coth.ui.ac.ir/article_20771_a61b6b2a7422542c7a03bc389a407784.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2008-9651 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2322-3421 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2036 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2016 16 87-100 |
allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ041248279 (DE-599)DOAJ2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per BT10-1480 Mahmoud Reza Sadraei verfasserin aut A Study of the Relationship between Mulla Sadra's " Extra-Intellectual Order" and Kierkegaard's "Sphere of Religion" 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Is there a domain beyond the illogical intellect whose statements are antirational? This question has always called gnosticism to encounter rationalism. Thus, gnostics, gnosticologists, and religionologists in both Christian west and Islamic east have always paid attention to intellect and the extraintellectual order, and to the possible relationthip between them. Mulla Sadra believed that neither the statements of the intellect are invalid in the extraintellectual order, nor the statements of the latter in the former. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, in his notion of human life stages, has labeled them as esthetic, ethical, and religious. In his view, the religious domain is extra-rational and extra-ethical. In an analytic process, Mulla Sadra has classified the implications and applications of the word "intellect". In his view, intellect is present in overall human domains and no order of humanity is void of the power of reason. Additionally, in epistemological terms, intellect cannot be in conflict with other components when opining within the domain of its own and its cognitive findings; and does not proscribe its ulterior. In other words, errors emerge in the stage of intellect's decreeing, not in the stage of senses' and intuition's reporting . Now the intellect itself is able to recognize its limits, admit ignorance, and lead the humanity to the boundaries of extra-rational matters. In Mulla Sadra's view, the epistemological and cognitive domain of extraintellectual order and the complexity of knowledge within this domain are not accessible to the intellect, being otherwise (e.g., through heart or revelation) achievable by humans. In Kierkegaard's view, intellect as human capacity of thought is annexative; and experiences and attitudes acquired in relation to the existence have formed human intellect; and the boundary sought by the intellect is, in a sense, the very purpose or objective of the intellect. With his partiality toward faith, Kierkegaard is a known to be a harsh critic of rationalism. He wants to remind his readers of limitations of human reason. Placing faith in the center of Christian thinking, he believed that intellect has no role in religious creed; and that the object of faith has to be paradoxical. Without submission to the paradoxical, the necessary passion and the ground for decision would not be peovided. Submitting to the paradoxical, a passionate human being displays his/her exyreme passion and commitment to the object of his/her faith, which is a paradox, and paradoxical as much as the paradox itself. In Kierkegaard's view, the void arising from the inconsistency of two discrete, and at the same time, subsequent issues (ethical and religious life) is filled by an existential issue, namely deapair. Such a despair, he argues, is an existential process swallowing the entire individual existence and is the result of paradoxes and substantial impasses that an individual faces within the extant conditions of his/her own life, becoming the turning point where a human being is detached fron morality and adjoins religion. Such a despair is deliberaye and chosen. Humans cannot be desperate without spliciting despair. When resolving it correctly, an individual would go beyond it righteously. In Islamic view, however, faith is not an anti rational category. In Mulla Sadra's view, faith is inclusive of instinctive knowledge and intuitive knowledge. Faith has various grades, one being intuitive. Another grade is the knowledge of God through argumentative comparison. Although faith is a matter of heart/instinct, the heartfelt/instinctive faith is not exclusive to exploratory knowledge; and knowledge of God through reasoning and arguments could be considered heartfelt/inatinctive faith. He tries to reconcile intellect and religion; or in other words, gnosticism and argumentation. In his specific semantic analytic method, Mulla Sadra links elements seemingly not directly related to the concept of faith to it, even calling them equivalents. He restructures other concepts such as light, science, wisdom, and intellect into a new superior framework, renarrating the theological concept of faith using Koranic, gnostic, and philosophical literature. That's why he tries to make an aperure between intellect and heart when reaching the topic of extraintellectual order. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, raises the issue of paradox when reaching the third stage of life or the sphere of religion in his methodological model. He concludes that the sphere of religion, and entry to the stage of faith is based on existenz and has no relevance to the conceptual existence and the concept of existence, but some sort of unity is realized between it an the authentic exterior existence; and even, one has to say, faith is the same as the existenz; and what he refers to as "extra-religion" is an extraintellectual order. In his view, the process of faith requires detention of intellect, which, of course, does not imply the omission and negation of intellect. Nulla Sadra, however, with his interpretation of extra intellectual order, accepts the fact that it's statements are not accessible to the intellect and the latter is incapable of fathoming then does not imply that if a human being reaches an understanding of extra intellectual order using other means than rationality, logics, and conceptual, influential methods, the intellect will be deaf and blind toward such an understanding. He believes that the statements of the extra intellectual order are not within the intellect's domain of comprehension but in another domain are known as heartfelt /instinctive knowledge. In fact, he denies the alienation of heart and mind because in his view, psyche has a transcendental essence and a collective unity. Therefore, he does not consider heart and mind as mutually exclusive; and that intellect does not deem impossible the heart's intuitions. His interpretations of extra intellectual order are based on his specific view of intellect and Islamic anthropology. However, when Kierkegaard considers the sphere of religion as irrational, he provides a specific conception of humanity contradicting that of Nulla Sadra because he portrays human beings as completely separate and aliens to one another as an archipelago. In fact, he closes all windows between intellect and heart when stating that in the extra intellectual order, the plunge is relevant, not rationalization. Hence the separation between Mulla Sadra's and Kierkegaard's thoughts. They both accept that intellect is not a complete source of knowledge for fathoming the truth. Faced with the paradox in the sphere of religion, Kierkegaard prescribed the detention of intellect. Mulla Sadra's, on the other hand, considers coordinated and consistent the perceptual realms and knowledge domains in both areas of intellect and the extra intellectual order beyond it. Kierkegaard is a life thinker who has considered the sphere of religion to beyond beyond ethics, intellect, and esthetics in his categorization of life stages. In both their views, the sphere of religion and extra intellectual order have a mysterious and allegorical identity; an allegory which is not a poetic, literary lingo, but a specific way of thinking and a specific method for achieving knowledge. This paper tries to examine the similarities and dissimilarities of those two ways of living, namely, the sphere of religion and the extra intellectual order in the views of the two great thinkers who have developed them. Beyond Intellect Intellect Paradox Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B Doctrinal Theology Abbas Hajiha verfasserin aut Akbar Goli Malekabadi verfasserin aut Seyyed ali alamolhoda Alamolhoda verfasserin aut In Comparative Theology University of Isfahan, 2013 7(2016), 16, Seite 87-100 (DE-627)1029195846 23223421 nnns volume:7 year:2016 number:16 pages:87-100 https://doaj.org/article/2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322 kostenfrei http://coth.ui.ac.ir/article_20771_a61b6b2a7422542c7a03bc389a407784.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2008-9651 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2322-3421 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2036 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2016 16 87-100 |
language |
Persian |
source |
In Comparative Theology 7(2016), 16, Seite 87-100 volume:7 year:2016 number:16 pages:87-100 |
sourceStr |
In Comparative Theology 7(2016), 16, Seite 87-100 volume:7 year:2016 number:16 pages:87-100 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Beyond Intellect Intellect Paradox Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B Doctrinal Theology |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Comparative Theology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Mahmoud Reza Sadraei @@aut@@ Abbas Hajiha @@aut@@ Akbar Goli Malekabadi @@aut@@ Seyyed ali alamolhoda Alamolhoda @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1029195846 |
id |
DOAJ041248279 |
language_de |
persisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ041248279</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308044845.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||per c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ041248279</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BT10-1480</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mahmoud Reza Sadraei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A Study of the Relationship between Mulla Sadra's " Extra-Intellectual Order" and Kierkegaard's "Sphere of Religion"</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Is there a domain beyond the illogical intellect whose statements are antirational? This question has always called gnosticism to encounter rationalism. Thus, gnostics, gnosticologists, and religionologists in both Christian west and Islamic east have always paid attention to intellect and the extraintellectual order, and to the possible relationthip between them. Mulla Sadra believed that neither the statements of the intellect are invalid in the extraintellectual order, nor the statements of the latter in the former. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, in his notion of human life stages, has labeled them as esthetic, ethical, and religious. In his view, the religious domain is extra-rational and extra-ethical. In an analytic process, Mulla Sadra has classified the implications and applications of the word "intellect". In his view, intellect is present in overall human domains and no order of humanity is void of the power of reason. Additionally, in epistemological terms, intellect cannot be in conflict with other components when opining within the domain of its own and its cognitive findings; and does not proscribe its ulterior. In other words, errors emerge in the stage of intellect's decreeing, not in the stage of senses' and intuition's reporting . Now the intellect itself is able to recognize its limits, admit ignorance, and lead the humanity to the boundaries of extra-rational matters. In Mulla Sadra's view, the epistemological and cognitive domain of extraintellectual order and the complexity of knowledge within this domain are not accessible to the intellect, being otherwise (e.g., through heart or revelation) achievable by humans. In Kierkegaard's view, intellect as human capacity of thought is annexative; and experiences and attitudes acquired in relation to the existence have formed human intellect; and the boundary sought by the intellect is, in a sense, the very purpose or objective of the intellect. With his partiality toward faith, Kierkegaard is a known to be a harsh critic of rationalism. He wants to remind his readers of limitations of human reason. Placing faith in the center of Christian thinking, he believed that intellect has no role in religious creed; and that the object of faith has to be paradoxical. Without submission to the paradoxical, the necessary passion and the ground for decision would not be peovided. Submitting to the paradoxical, a passionate human being displays his/her exyreme passion and commitment to the object of his/her faith, which is a paradox, and paradoxical as much as the paradox itself. In Kierkegaard's view, the void arising from the inconsistency of two discrete, and at the same time, subsequent issues (ethical and religious life) is filled by an existential issue, namely deapair. Such a despair, he argues, is an existential process swallowing the entire individual existence and is the result of paradoxes and substantial impasses that an individual faces within the extant conditions of his/her own life, becoming the turning point where a human being is detached fron morality and adjoins religion. Such a despair is deliberaye and chosen. Humans cannot be desperate without spliciting despair. When resolving it correctly, an individual would go beyond it righteously. In Islamic view, however, faith is not an anti rational category. In Mulla Sadra's view, faith is inclusive of instinctive knowledge and intuitive knowledge. Faith has various grades, one being intuitive. Another grade is the knowledge of God through argumentative comparison. Although faith is a matter of heart/instinct, the heartfelt/instinctive faith is not exclusive to exploratory knowledge; and knowledge of God through reasoning and arguments could be considered heartfelt/inatinctive faith. He tries to reconcile intellect and religion; or in other words, gnosticism and argumentation. In his specific semantic analytic method, Mulla Sadra links elements seemingly not directly related to the concept of faith to it, even calling them equivalents. He restructures other concepts such as light, science, wisdom, and intellect into a new superior framework, renarrating the theological concept of faith using Koranic, gnostic, and philosophical literature. That's why he tries to make an aperure between intellect and heart when reaching the topic of extraintellectual order. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, raises the issue of paradox when reaching the third stage of life or the sphere of religion in his methodological model. He concludes that the sphere of religion, and entry to the stage of faith is based on existenz and has no relevance to the conceptual existence and the concept of existence, but some sort of unity is realized between it an the authentic exterior existence; and even, one has to say, faith is the same as the existenz; and what he refers to as "extra-religion" is an extraintellectual order. In his view, the process of faith requires detention of intellect, which, of course, does not imply the omission and negation of intellect. Nulla Sadra, however, with his interpretation of extra intellectual order, accepts the fact that it's statements are not accessible to the intellect and the latter is incapable of fathoming then does not imply that if a human being reaches an understanding of extra intellectual order using other means than rationality, logics, and conceptual, influential methods, the intellect will be deaf and blind toward such an understanding. He believes that the statements of the extra intellectual order are not within the intellect's domain of comprehension but in another domain are known as heartfelt /instinctive knowledge. In fact, he denies the alienation of heart and mind because in his view, psyche has a transcendental essence and a collective unity. Therefore, he does not consider heart and mind as mutually exclusive; and that intellect does not deem impossible the heart's intuitions. His interpretations of extra intellectual order are based on his specific view of intellect and Islamic anthropology. However, when Kierkegaard considers the sphere of religion as irrational, he provides a specific conception of humanity contradicting that of Nulla Sadra because he portrays human beings as completely separate and aliens to one another as an archipelago. In fact, he closes all windows between intellect and heart when stating that in the extra intellectual order, the plunge is relevant, not rationalization. Hence the separation between Mulla Sadra's and Kierkegaard's thoughts. They both accept that intellect is not a complete source of knowledge for fathoming the truth. Faced with the paradox in the sphere of religion, Kierkegaard prescribed the detention of intellect. Mulla Sadra's, on the other hand, considers coordinated and consistent the perceptual realms and knowledge domains in both areas of intellect and the extra intellectual order beyond it. Kierkegaard is a life thinker who has considered the sphere of religion to beyond beyond ethics, intellect, and esthetics in his categorization of life stages. In both their views, the sphere of religion and extra intellectual order have a mysterious and allegorical identity; an allegory which is not a poetic, literary lingo, but a specific way of thinking and a specific method for achieving knowledge. This paper tries to examine the similarities and dissimilarities of those two ways of living, namely, the sphere of religion and the extra intellectual order in the views of the two great thinkers who have developed them.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Beyond Intellect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intellect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Paradox</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy. Psychology. Religion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Doctrinal Theology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abbas Hajiha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Akbar Goli Malekabadi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seyyed ali alamolhoda Alamolhoda</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Comparative Theology</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Isfahan, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2016), 16, Seite 87-100</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1029195846</subfield><subfield code="x">23223421</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:16</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:87-100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://coth.ui.ac.ir/article_20771_a61b6b2a7422542c7a03bc389a407784.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2008-9651</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2322-3421</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2036</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">16</subfield><subfield code="h">87-100</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
author |
Mahmoud Reza Sadraei |
spellingShingle |
Mahmoud Reza Sadraei misc BT10-1480 misc Beyond Intellect misc Intellect misc Paradox misc Philosophy. Psychology. Religion misc B misc Doctrinal Theology A Study of the Relationship between Mulla Sadra's " Extra-Intellectual Order" and Kierkegaard's "Sphere of Religion" |
authorStr |
Mahmoud Reza Sadraei |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1029195846 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
BT10-1480 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
23223421 |
topic_title |
BT10-1480 A Study of the Relationship between Mulla Sadra's " Extra-Intellectual Order" and Kierkegaard's "Sphere of Religion" Beyond Intellect Intellect Paradox |
topic |
misc BT10-1480 misc Beyond Intellect misc Intellect misc Paradox misc Philosophy. Psychology. Religion misc B misc Doctrinal Theology |
topic_unstemmed |
misc BT10-1480 misc Beyond Intellect misc Intellect misc Paradox misc Philosophy. Psychology. Religion misc B misc Doctrinal Theology |
topic_browse |
misc BT10-1480 misc Beyond Intellect misc Intellect misc Paradox misc Philosophy. Psychology. Religion misc B misc Doctrinal Theology |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Comparative Theology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1029195846 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Comparative Theology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1029195846 |
title |
A Study of the Relationship between Mulla Sadra's " Extra-Intellectual Order" and Kierkegaard's "Sphere of Religion" |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ041248279 (DE-599)DOAJ2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322 |
title_full |
A Study of the Relationship between Mulla Sadra's " Extra-Intellectual Order" and Kierkegaard's "Sphere of Religion" |
author_sort |
Mahmoud Reza Sadraei |
journal |
Comparative Theology |
journalStr |
Comparative Theology |
callnumber-first-code |
B |
lang_code |
per |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
87 |
author_browse |
Mahmoud Reza Sadraei Abbas Hajiha Akbar Goli Malekabadi Seyyed ali alamolhoda Alamolhoda |
container_volume |
7 |
class |
BT10-1480 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Mahmoud Reza Sadraei |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
study of the relationship between mulla sadra's " extra-intellectual order" and kierkegaard's "sphere of religion" |
callnumber |
BT10-1480 |
title_auth |
A Study of the Relationship between Mulla Sadra's " Extra-Intellectual Order" and Kierkegaard's "Sphere of Religion" |
abstract |
Is there a domain beyond the illogical intellect whose statements are antirational? This question has always called gnosticism to encounter rationalism. Thus, gnostics, gnosticologists, and religionologists in both Christian west and Islamic east have always paid attention to intellect and the extraintellectual order, and to the possible relationthip between them. Mulla Sadra believed that neither the statements of the intellect are invalid in the extraintellectual order, nor the statements of the latter in the former. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, in his notion of human life stages, has labeled them as esthetic, ethical, and religious. In his view, the religious domain is extra-rational and extra-ethical. In an analytic process, Mulla Sadra has classified the implications and applications of the word "intellect". In his view, intellect is present in overall human domains and no order of humanity is void of the power of reason. Additionally, in epistemological terms, intellect cannot be in conflict with other components when opining within the domain of its own and its cognitive findings; and does not proscribe its ulterior. In other words, errors emerge in the stage of intellect's decreeing, not in the stage of senses' and intuition's reporting . Now the intellect itself is able to recognize its limits, admit ignorance, and lead the humanity to the boundaries of extra-rational matters. In Mulla Sadra's view, the epistemological and cognitive domain of extraintellectual order and the complexity of knowledge within this domain are not accessible to the intellect, being otherwise (e.g., through heart or revelation) achievable by humans. In Kierkegaard's view, intellect as human capacity of thought is annexative; and experiences and attitudes acquired in relation to the existence have formed human intellect; and the boundary sought by the intellect is, in a sense, the very purpose or objective of the intellect. With his partiality toward faith, Kierkegaard is a known to be a harsh critic of rationalism. He wants to remind his readers of limitations of human reason. Placing faith in the center of Christian thinking, he believed that intellect has no role in religious creed; and that the object of faith has to be paradoxical. Without submission to the paradoxical, the necessary passion and the ground for decision would not be peovided. Submitting to the paradoxical, a passionate human being displays his/her exyreme passion and commitment to the object of his/her faith, which is a paradox, and paradoxical as much as the paradox itself. In Kierkegaard's view, the void arising from the inconsistency of two discrete, and at the same time, subsequent issues (ethical and religious life) is filled by an existential issue, namely deapair. Such a despair, he argues, is an existential process swallowing the entire individual existence and is the result of paradoxes and substantial impasses that an individual faces within the extant conditions of his/her own life, becoming the turning point where a human being is detached fron morality and adjoins religion. Such a despair is deliberaye and chosen. Humans cannot be desperate without spliciting despair. When resolving it correctly, an individual would go beyond it righteously. In Islamic view, however, faith is not an anti rational category. In Mulla Sadra's view, faith is inclusive of instinctive knowledge and intuitive knowledge. Faith has various grades, one being intuitive. Another grade is the knowledge of God through argumentative comparison. Although faith is a matter of heart/instinct, the heartfelt/instinctive faith is not exclusive to exploratory knowledge; and knowledge of God through reasoning and arguments could be considered heartfelt/inatinctive faith. He tries to reconcile intellect and religion; or in other words, gnosticism and argumentation. In his specific semantic analytic method, Mulla Sadra links elements seemingly not directly related to the concept of faith to it, even calling them equivalents. He restructures other concepts such as light, science, wisdom, and intellect into a new superior framework, renarrating the theological concept of faith using Koranic, gnostic, and philosophical literature. That's why he tries to make an aperure between intellect and heart when reaching the topic of extraintellectual order. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, raises the issue of paradox when reaching the third stage of life or the sphere of religion in his methodological model. He concludes that the sphere of religion, and entry to the stage of faith is based on existenz and has no relevance to the conceptual existence and the concept of existence, but some sort of unity is realized between it an the authentic exterior existence; and even, one has to say, faith is the same as the existenz; and what he refers to as "extra-religion" is an extraintellectual order. In his view, the process of faith requires detention of intellect, which, of course, does not imply the omission and negation of intellect. Nulla Sadra, however, with his interpretation of extra intellectual order, accepts the fact that it's statements are not accessible to the intellect and the latter is incapable of fathoming then does not imply that if a human being reaches an understanding of extra intellectual order using other means than rationality, logics, and conceptual, influential methods, the intellect will be deaf and blind toward such an understanding. He believes that the statements of the extra intellectual order are not within the intellect's domain of comprehension but in another domain are known as heartfelt /instinctive knowledge. In fact, he denies the alienation of heart and mind because in his view, psyche has a transcendental essence and a collective unity. Therefore, he does not consider heart and mind as mutually exclusive; and that intellect does not deem impossible the heart's intuitions. His interpretations of extra intellectual order are based on his specific view of intellect and Islamic anthropology. However, when Kierkegaard considers the sphere of religion as irrational, he provides a specific conception of humanity contradicting that of Nulla Sadra because he portrays human beings as completely separate and aliens to one another as an archipelago. In fact, he closes all windows between intellect and heart when stating that in the extra intellectual order, the plunge is relevant, not rationalization. Hence the separation between Mulla Sadra's and Kierkegaard's thoughts. They both accept that intellect is not a complete source of knowledge for fathoming the truth. Faced with the paradox in the sphere of religion, Kierkegaard prescribed the detention of intellect. Mulla Sadra's, on the other hand, considers coordinated and consistent the perceptual realms and knowledge domains in both areas of intellect and the extra intellectual order beyond it. Kierkegaard is a life thinker who has considered the sphere of religion to beyond beyond ethics, intellect, and esthetics in his categorization of life stages. In both their views, the sphere of religion and extra intellectual order have a mysterious and allegorical identity; an allegory which is not a poetic, literary lingo, but a specific way of thinking and a specific method for achieving knowledge. This paper tries to examine the similarities and dissimilarities of those two ways of living, namely, the sphere of religion and the extra intellectual order in the views of the two great thinkers who have developed them. |
abstractGer |
Is there a domain beyond the illogical intellect whose statements are antirational? This question has always called gnosticism to encounter rationalism. Thus, gnostics, gnosticologists, and religionologists in both Christian west and Islamic east have always paid attention to intellect and the extraintellectual order, and to the possible relationthip between them. Mulla Sadra believed that neither the statements of the intellect are invalid in the extraintellectual order, nor the statements of the latter in the former. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, in his notion of human life stages, has labeled them as esthetic, ethical, and religious. In his view, the religious domain is extra-rational and extra-ethical. In an analytic process, Mulla Sadra has classified the implications and applications of the word "intellect". In his view, intellect is present in overall human domains and no order of humanity is void of the power of reason. Additionally, in epistemological terms, intellect cannot be in conflict with other components when opining within the domain of its own and its cognitive findings; and does not proscribe its ulterior. In other words, errors emerge in the stage of intellect's decreeing, not in the stage of senses' and intuition's reporting . Now the intellect itself is able to recognize its limits, admit ignorance, and lead the humanity to the boundaries of extra-rational matters. In Mulla Sadra's view, the epistemological and cognitive domain of extraintellectual order and the complexity of knowledge within this domain are not accessible to the intellect, being otherwise (e.g., through heart or revelation) achievable by humans. In Kierkegaard's view, intellect as human capacity of thought is annexative; and experiences and attitudes acquired in relation to the existence have formed human intellect; and the boundary sought by the intellect is, in a sense, the very purpose or objective of the intellect. With his partiality toward faith, Kierkegaard is a known to be a harsh critic of rationalism. He wants to remind his readers of limitations of human reason. Placing faith in the center of Christian thinking, he believed that intellect has no role in religious creed; and that the object of faith has to be paradoxical. Without submission to the paradoxical, the necessary passion and the ground for decision would not be peovided. Submitting to the paradoxical, a passionate human being displays his/her exyreme passion and commitment to the object of his/her faith, which is a paradox, and paradoxical as much as the paradox itself. In Kierkegaard's view, the void arising from the inconsistency of two discrete, and at the same time, subsequent issues (ethical and religious life) is filled by an existential issue, namely deapair. Such a despair, he argues, is an existential process swallowing the entire individual existence and is the result of paradoxes and substantial impasses that an individual faces within the extant conditions of his/her own life, becoming the turning point where a human being is detached fron morality and adjoins religion. Such a despair is deliberaye and chosen. Humans cannot be desperate without spliciting despair. When resolving it correctly, an individual would go beyond it righteously. In Islamic view, however, faith is not an anti rational category. In Mulla Sadra's view, faith is inclusive of instinctive knowledge and intuitive knowledge. Faith has various grades, one being intuitive. Another grade is the knowledge of God through argumentative comparison. Although faith is a matter of heart/instinct, the heartfelt/instinctive faith is not exclusive to exploratory knowledge; and knowledge of God through reasoning and arguments could be considered heartfelt/inatinctive faith. He tries to reconcile intellect and religion; or in other words, gnosticism and argumentation. In his specific semantic analytic method, Mulla Sadra links elements seemingly not directly related to the concept of faith to it, even calling them equivalents. He restructures other concepts such as light, science, wisdom, and intellect into a new superior framework, renarrating the theological concept of faith using Koranic, gnostic, and philosophical literature. That's why he tries to make an aperure between intellect and heart when reaching the topic of extraintellectual order. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, raises the issue of paradox when reaching the third stage of life or the sphere of religion in his methodological model. He concludes that the sphere of religion, and entry to the stage of faith is based on existenz and has no relevance to the conceptual existence and the concept of existence, but some sort of unity is realized between it an the authentic exterior existence; and even, one has to say, faith is the same as the existenz; and what he refers to as "extra-religion" is an extraintellectual order. In his view, the process of faith requires detention of intellect, which, of course, does not imply the omission and negation of intellect. Nulla Sadra, however, with his interpretation of extra intellectual order, accepts the fact that it's statements are not accessible to the intellect and the latter is incapable of fathoming then does not imply that if a human being reaches an understanding of extra intellectual order using other means than rationality, logics, and conceptual, influential methods, the intellect will be deaf and blind toward such an understanding. He believes that the statements of the extra intellectual order are not within the intellect's domain of comprehension but in another domain are known as heartfelt /instinctive knowledge. In fact, he denies the alienation of heart and mind because in his view, psyche has a transcendental essence and a collective unity. Therefore, he does not consider heart and mind as mutually exclusive; and that intellect does not deem impossible the heart's intuitions. His interpretations of extra intellectual order are based on his specific view of intellect and Islamic anthropology. However, when Kierkegaard considers the sphere of religion as irrational, he provides a specific conception of humanity contradicting that of Nulla Sadra because he portrays human beings as completely separate and aliens to one another as an archipelago. In fact, he closes all windows between intellect and heart when stating that in the extra intellectual order, the plunge is relevant, not rationalization. Hence the separation between Mulla Sadra's and Kierkegaard's thoughts. They both accept that intellect is not a complete source of knowledge for fathoming the truth. Faced with the paradox in the sphere of religion, Kierkegaard prescribed the detention of intellect. Mulla Sadra's, on the other hand, considers coordinated and consistent the perceptual realms and knowledge domains in both areas of intellect and the extra intellectual order beyond it. Kierkegaard is a life thinker who has considered the sphere of religion to beyond beyond ethics, intellect, and esthetics in his categorization of life stages. In both their views, the sphere of religion and extra intellectual order have a mysterious and allegorical identity; an allegory which is not a poetic, literary lingo, but a specific way of thinking and a specific method for achieving knowledge. This paper tries to examine the similarities and dissimilarities of those two ways of living, namely, the sphere of religion and the extra intellectual order in the views of the two great thinkers who have developed them. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Is there a domain beyond the illogical intellect whose statements are antirational? This question has always called gnosticism to encounter rationalism. Thus, gnostics, gnosticologists, and religionologists in both Christian west and Islamic east have always paid attention to intellect and the extraintellectual order, and to the possible relationthip between them. Mulla Sadra believed that neither the statements of the intellect are invalid in the extraintellectual order, nor the statements of the latter in the former. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, in his notion of human life stages, has labeled them as esthetic, ethical, and religious. In his view, the religious domain is extra-rational and extra-ethical. In an analytic process, Mulla Sadra has classified the implications and applications of the word "intellect". In his view, intellect is present in overall human domains and no order of humanity is void of the power of reason. Additionally, in epistemological terms, intellect cannot be in conflict with other components when opining within the domain of its own and its cognitive findings; and does not proscribe its ulterior. In other words, errors emerge in the stage of intellect's decreeing, not in the stage of senses' and intuition's reporting . Now the intellect itself is able to recognize its limits, admit ignorance, and lead the humanity to the boundaries of extra-rational matters. In Mulla Sadra's view, the epistemological and cognitive domain of extraintellectual order and the complexity of knowledge within this domain are not accessible to the intellect, being otherwise (e.g., through heart or revelation) achievable by humans. In Kierkegaard's view, intellect as human capacity of thought is annexative; and experiences and attitudes acquired in relation to the existence have formed human intellect; and the boundary sought by the intellect is, in a sense, the very purpose or objective of the intellect. With his partiality toward faith, Kierkegaard is a known to be a harsh critic of rationalism. He wants to remind his readers of limitations of human reason. Placing faith in the center of Christian thinking, he believed that intellect has no role in religious creed; and that the object of faith has to be paradoxical. Without submission to the paradoxical, the necessary passion and the ground for decision would not be peovided. Submitting to the paradoxical, a passionate human being displays his/her exyreme passion and commitment to the object of his/her faith, which is a paradox, and paradoxical as much as the paradox itself. In Kierkegaard's view, the void arising from the inconsistency of two discrete, and at the same time, subsequent issues (ethical and religious life) is filled by an existential issue, namely deapair. Such a despair, he argues, is an existential process swallowing the entire individual existence and is the result of paradoxes and substantial impasses that an individual faces within the extant conditions of his/her own life, becoming the turning point where a human being is detached fron morality and adjoins religion. Such a despair is deliberaye and chosen. Humans cannot be desperate without spliciting despair. When resolving it correctly, an individual would go beyond it righteously. In Islamic view, however, faith is not an anti rational category. In Mulla Sadra's view, faith is inclusive of instinctive knowledge and intuitive knowledge. Faith has various grades, one being intuitive. Another grade is the knowledge of God through argumentative comparison. Although faith is a matter of heart/instinct, the heartfelt/instinctive faith is not exclusive to exploratory knowledge; and knowledge of God through reasoning and arguments could be considered heartfelt/inatinctive faith. He tries to reconcile intellect and religion; or in other words, gnosticism and argumentation. In his specific semantic analytic method, Mulla Sadra links elements seemingly not directly related to the concept of faith to it, even calling them equivalents. He restructures other concepts such as light, science, wisdom, and intellect into a new superior framework, renarrating the theological concept of faith using Koranic, gnostic, and philosophical literature. That's why he tries to make an aperure between intellect and heart when reaching the topic of extraintellectual order. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, raises the issue of paradox when reaching the third stage of life or the sphere of religion in his methodological model. He concludes that the sphere of religion, and entry to the stage of faith is based on existenz and has no relevance to the conceptual existence and the concept of existence, but some sort of unity is realized between it an the authentic exterior existence; and even, one has to say, faith is the same as the existenz; and what he refers to as "extra-religion" is an extraintellectual order. In his view, the process of faith requires detention of intellect, which, of course, does not imply the omission and negation of intellect. Nulla Sadra, however, with his interpretation of extra intellectual order, accepts the fact that it's statements are not accessible to the intellect and the latter is incapable of fathoming then does not imply that if a human being reaches an understanding of extra intellectual order using other means than rationality, logics, and conceptual, influential methods, the intellect will be deaf and blind toward such an understanding. He believes that the statements of the extra intellectual order are not within the intellect's domain of comprehension but in another domain are known as heartfelt /instinctive knowledge. In fact, he denies the alienation of heart and mind because in his view, psyche has a transcendental essence and a collective unity. Therefore, he does not consider heart and mind as mutually exclusive; and that intellect does not deem impossible the heart's intuitions. His interpretations of extra intellectual order are based on his specific view of intellect and Islamic anthropology. However, when Kierkegaard considers the sphere of religion as irrational, he provides a specific conception of humanity contradicting that of Nulla Sadra because he portrays human beings as completely separate and aliens to one another as an archipelago. In fact, he closes all windows between intellect and heart when stating that in the extra intellectual order, the plunge is relevant, not rationalization. Hence the separation between Mulla Sadra's and Kierkegaard's thoughts. They both accept that intellect is not a complete source of knowledge for fathoming the truth. Faced with the paradox in the sphere of religion, Kierkegaard prescribed the detention of intellect. Mulla Sadra's, on the other hand, considers coordinated and consistent the perceptual realms and knowledge domains in both areas of intellect and the extra intellectual order beyond it. Kierkegaard is a life thinker who has considered the sphere of religion to beyond beyond ethics, intellect, and esthetics in his categorization of life stages. In both their views, the sphere of religion and extra intellectual order have a mysterious and allegorical identity; an allegory which is not a poetic, literary lingo, but a specific way of thinking and a specific method for achieving knowledge. This paper tries to examine the similarities and dissimilarities of those two ways of living, namely, the sphere of religion and the extra intellectual order in the views of the two great thinkers who have developed them. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2036 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
16 |
title_short |
A Study of the Relationship between Mulla Sadra's " Extra-Intellectual Order" and Kierkegaard's "Sphere of Religion" |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322 http://coth.ui.ac.ir/article_20771_a61b6b2a7422542c7a03bc389a407784.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2008-9651 https://doaj.org/toc/2322-3421 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Abbas Hajiha Akbar Goli Malekabadi Seyyed ali alamolhoda Alamolhoda |
author2Str |
Abbas Hajiha Akbar Goli Malekabadi Seyyed ali alamolhoda Alamolhoda |
ppnlink |
1029195846 |
callnumber-subject |
BT - Doctrinal Theology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
callnumber-a |
BT10-1480 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T19:13:28.450Z |
_version_ |
1803586380445515776 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ041248279</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308044845.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||per c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ041248279</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BT10-1480</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mahmoud Reza Sadraei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A Study of the Relationship between Mulla Sadra's " Extra-Intellectual Order" and Kierkegaard's "Sphere of Religion"</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Is there a domain beyond the illogical intellect whose statements are antirational? This question has always called gnosticism to encounter rationalism. Thus, gnostics, gnosticologists, and religionologists in both Christian west and Islamic east have always paid attention to intellect and the extraintellectual order, and to the possible relationthip between them. Mulla Sadra believed that neither the statements of the intellect are invalid in the extraintellectual order, nor the statements of the latter in the former. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, in his notion of human life stages, has labeled them as esthetic, ethical, and religious. In his view, the religious domain is extra-rational and extra-ethical. In an analytic process, Mulla Sadra has classified the implications and applications of the word "intellect". In his view, intellect is present in overall human domains and no order of humanity is void of the power of reason. Additionally, in epistemological terms, intellect cannot be in conflict with other components when opining within the domain of its own and its cognitive findings; and does not proscribe its ulterior. In other words, errors emerge in the stage of intellect's decreeing, not in the stage of senses' and intuition's reporting . Now the intellect itself is able to recognize its limits, admit ignorance, and lead the humanity to the boundaries of extra-rational matters. In Mulla Sadra's view, the epistemological and cognitive domain of extraintellectual order and the complexity of knowledge within this domain are not accessible to the intellect, being otherwise (e.g., through heart or revelation) achievable by humans. In Kierkegaard's view, intellect as human capacity of thought is annexative; and experiences and attitudes acquired in relation to the existence have formed human intellect; and the boundary sought by the intellect is, in a sense, the very purpose or objective of the intellect. With his partiality toward faith, Kierkegaard is a known to be a harsh critic of rationalism. He wants to remind his readers of limitations of human reason. Placing faith in the center of Christian thinking, he believed that intellect has no role in religious creed; and that the object of faith has to be paradoxical. Without submission to the paradoxical, the necessary passion and the ground for decision would not be peovided. Submitting to the paradoxical, a passionate human being displays his/her exyreme passion and commitment to the object of his/her faith, which is a paradox, and paradoxical as much as the paradox itself. In Kierkegaard's view, the void arising from the inconsistency of two discrete, and at the same time, subsequent issues (ethical and religious life) is filled by an existential issue, namely deapair. Such a despair, he argues, is an existential process swallowing the entire individual existence and is the result of paradoxes and substantial impasses that an individual faces within the extant conditions of his/her own life, becoming the turning point where a human being is detached fron morality and adjoins religion. Such a despair is deliberaye and chosen. Humans cannot be desperate without spliciting despair. When resolving it correctly, an individual would go beyond it righteously. In Islamic view, however, faith is not an anti rational category. In Mulla Sadra's view, faith is inclusive of instinctive knowledge and intuitive knowledge. Faith has various grades, one being intuitive. Another grade is the knowledge of God through argumentative comparison. Although faith is a matter of heart/instinct, the heartfelt/instinctive faith is not exclusive to exploratory knowledge; and knowledge of God through reasoning and arguments could be considered heartfelt/inatinctive faith. He tries to reconcile intellect and religion; or in other words, gnosticism and argumentation. In his specific semantic analytic method, Mulla Sadra links elements seemingly not directly related to the concept of faith to it, even calling them equivalents. He restructures other concepts such as light, science, wisdom, and intellect into a new superior framework, renarrating the theological concept of faith using Koranic, gnostic, and philosophical literature. That's why he tries to make an aperure between intellect and heart when reaching the topic of extraintellectual order. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, raises the issue of paradox when reaching the third stage of life or the sphere of religion in his methodological model. He concludes that the sphere of religion, and entry to the stage of faith is based on existenz and has no relevance to the conceptual existence and the concept of existence, but some sort of unity is realized between it an the authentic exterior existence; and even, one has to say, faith is the same as the existenz; and what he refers to as "extra-religion" is an extraintellectual order. In his view, the process of faith requires detention of intellect, which, of course, does not imply the omission and negation of intellect. Nulla Sadra, however, with his interpretation of extra intellectual order, accepts the fact that it's statements are not accessible to the intellect and the latter is incapable of fathoming then does not imply that if a human being reaches an understanding of extra intellectual order using other means than rationality, logics, and conceptual, influential methods, the intellect will be deaf and blind toward such an understanding. He believes that the statements of the extra intellectual order are not within the intellect's domain of comprehension but in another domain are known as heartfelt /instinctive knowledge. In fact, he denies the alienation of heart and mind because in his view, psyche has a transcendental essence and a collective unity. Therefore, he does not consider heart and mind as mutually exclusive; and that intellect does not deem impossible the heart's intuitions. His interpretations of extra intellectual order are based on his specific view of intellect and Islamic anthropology. However, when Kierkegaard considers the sphere of religion as irrational, he provides a specific conception of humanity contradicting that of Nulla Sadra because he portrays human beings as completely separate and aliens to one another as an archipelago. In fact, he closes all windows between intellect and heart when stating that in the extra intellectual order, the plunge is relevant, not rationalization. Hence the separation between Mulla Sadra's and Kierkegaard's thoughts. They both accept that intellect is not a complete source of knowledge for fathoming the truth. Faced with the paradox in the sphere of religion, Kierkegaard prescribed the detention of intellect. Mulla Sadra's, on the other hand, considers coordinated and consistent the perceptual realms and knowledge domains in both areas of intellect and the extra intellectual order beyond it. Kierkegaard is a life thinker who has considered the sphere of religion to beyond beyond ethics, intellect, and esthetics in his categorization of life stages. In both their views, the sphere of religion and extra intellectual order have a mysterious and allegorical identity; an allegory which is not a poetic, literary lingo, but a specific way of thinking and a specific method for achieving knowledge. This paper tries to examine the similarities and dissimilarities of those two ways of living, namely, the sphere of religion and the extra intellectual order in the views of the two great thinkers who have developed them.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Beyond Intellect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intellect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Paradox</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy. Psychology. Religion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Doctrinal Theology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abbas Hajiha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Akbar Goli Malekabadi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seyyed ali alamolhoda Alamolhoda</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Comparative Theology</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Isfahan, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2016), 16, Seite 87-100</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1029195846</subfield><subfield code="x">23223421</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:16</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:87-100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/2eb2e20b75b94e28acb2441de5906322</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://coth.ui.ac.ir/article_20771_a61b6b2a7422542c7a03bc389a407784.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2008-9651</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2322-3421</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2036</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">16</subfield><subfield code="h">87-100</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.398197 |