Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences

Recently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From Apri...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Moon Suk Choi [verfasserIn] Seong Hyeon Yun [verfasserIn] Jung Kyong Shin [verfasserIn] Yoon Ah Park [verfasserIn] Jung Wook Huh [verfasserIn] Yong Beom Cho [verfasserIn] Hee Cheol Kim [verfasserIn] Woo Yong Lee [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	rectal neoplasms proctectomy robotic surgical procedure minimally invasive surgical procedures

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Annals of Coloproctology - Korean Society of Coloproctology, 2022, 38(2022), 1, Seite 88-92
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:38 ; year:2022 ; number:1 ; pages:88-92

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ041426614

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ041426614
003	DE-627
005	20230308050055.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ041426614
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RC799-869
100	0		\|a Moon Suk Choi \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Recently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From April 2019 to March 2020, APR using a SPR platform was performed in a total of 4 patients. Three patients had a transumbilical approach, and 1 patient had a transstoma site approach. The average operation time was 307 minutes, and the patient docking time to the SPR platform was 133.5 minutes. There were no complications during the operation, and no laparoscopy or open conversion. No reoperation occurred within 30 days. Mild postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients. We found that APR has safety and feasibility in surgery using an SPR platform. There was no intraoperative event and severe postoperative complications.
650		4	\|a rectal neoplasms
650		4	\|a proctectomy
650		4	\|a robotic surgical procedure
650		4	\|a minimally invasive surgical procedures
653		0	\|a Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
700	0		\|a Seong Hyeon Yun \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jung Kyong Shin \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yoon Ah Park \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jung Wook Huh \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yong Beom Cho \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Hee Cheol Kim \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Woo Yong Lee \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Annals of Coloproctology \|d Korean Society of Coloproctology, 2022 \|g 38(2022), 1, Seite 88-92 \|w (DE-627)742225496 \|w (DE-600)2711906-3 \|x 22879722 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:38 \|g year:2022 \|g number:1 \|g pages:88-92
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://coloproctol.org/upload/pdf/ac-2021-00395-0056.pdf \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9714 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9722 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 38 \|j 2022 \|e 1 \|h 88-92

Indexfelder

author_variant	m s c msc s h y shy j k s jks y a p yap j w h jwh y b c ybc h c k hck w y l wyl
matchkey_str	article:22879722:2022----::igeotooasseadmnprnarscincsrveot
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
callnumber-subject-code	RC
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056 doi (DE-627)DOAJ041426614 (DE-599)DOAJ4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC799-869 Moon Suk Choi verfasserin aut Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Recently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From April 2019 to March 2020, APR using a SPR platform was performed in a total of 4 patients. Three patients had a transumbilical approach, and 1 patient had a transstoma site approach. The average operation time was 307 minutes, and the patient docking time to the SPR platform was 133.5 minutes. There were no complications during the operation, and no laparoscopy or open conversion. No reoperation occurred within 30 days. Mild postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients. We found that APR has safety and feasibility in surgery using an SPR platform. There was no intraoperative event and severe postoperative complications. rectal neoplasms proctectomy robotic surgical procedure minimally invasive surgical procedures Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology Seong Hyeon Yun verfasserin aut Jung Kyong Shin verfasserin aut Yoon Ah Park verfasserin aut Jung Wook Huh verfasserin aut Yong Beom Cho verfasserin aut Hee Cheol Kim verfasserin aut Woo Yong Lee verfasserin aut In Annals of Coloproctology Korean Society of Coloproctology, 2022 38(2022), 1, Seite 88-92 (DE-627)742225496 (DE-600)2711906-3 22879722 nnns volume:38 year:2022 number:1 pages:88-92 https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d kostenfrei http://coloproctol.org/upload/pdf/ac-2021-00395-0056.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9714 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9722 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 38 2022 1 88-92
spelling	10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056 doi (DE-627)DOAJ041426614 (DE-599)DOAJ4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC799-869 Moon Suk Choi verfasserin aut Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Recently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From April 2019 to March 2020, APR using a SPR platform was performed in a total of 4 patients. Three patients had a transumbilical approach, and 1 patient had a transstoma site approach. The average operation time was 307 minutes, and the patient docking time to the SPR platform was 133.5 minutes. There were no complications during the operation, and no laparoscopy or open conversion. No reoperation occurred within 30 days. Mild postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients. We found that APR has safety and feasibility in surgery using an SPR platform. There was no intraoperative event and severe postoperative complications. rectal neoplasms proctectomy robotic surgical procedure minimally invasive surgical procedures Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology Seong Hyeon Yun verfasserin aut Jung Kyong Shin verfasserin aut Yoon Ah Park verfasserin aut Jung Wook Huh verfasserin aut Yong Beom Cho verfasserin aut Hee Cheol Kim verfasserin aut Woo Yong Lee verfasserin aut In Annals of Coloproctology Korean Society of Coloproctology, 2022 38(2022), 1, Seite 88-92 (DE-627)742225496 (DE-600)2711906-3 22879722 nnns volume:38 year:2022 number:1 pages:88-92 https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d kostenfrei http://coloproctol.org/upload/pdf/ac-2021-00395-0056.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9714 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9722 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 38 2022 1 88-92
allfields_unstemmed	10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056 doi (DE-627)DOAJ041426614 (DE-599)DOAJ4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC799-869 Moon Suk Choi verfasserin aut Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Recently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From April 2019 to March 2020, APR using a SPR platform was performed in a total of 4 patients. Three patients had a transumbilical approach, and 1 patient had a transstoma site approach. The average operation time was 307 minutes, and the patient docking time to the SPR platform was 133.5 minutes. There were no complications during the operation, and no laparoscopy or open conversion. No reoperation occurred within 30 days. Mild postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients. We found that APR has safety and feasibility in surgery using an SPR platform. There was no intraoperative event and severe postoperative complications. rectal neoplasms proctectomy robotic surgical procedure minimally invasive surgical procedures Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology Seong Hyeon Yun verfasserin aut Jung Kyong Shin verfasserin aut Yoon Ah Park verfasserin aut Jung Wook Huh verfasserin aut Yong Beom Cho verfasserin aut Hee Cheol Kim verfasserin aut Woo Yong Lee verfasserin aut In Annals of Coloproctology Korean Society of Coloproctology, 2022 38(2022), 1, Seite 88-92 (DE-627)742225496 (DE-600)2711906-3 22879722 nnns volume:38 year:2022 number:1 pages:88-92 https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d kostenfrei http://coloproctol.org/upload/pdf/ac-2021-00395-0056.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9714 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9722 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 38 2022 1 88-92
allfieldsGer	10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056 doi (DE-627)DOAJ041426614 (DE-599)DOAJ4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC799-869 Moon Suk Choi verfasserin aut Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Recently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From April 2019 to March 2020, APR using a SPR platform was performed in a total of 4 patients. Three patients had a transumbilical approach, and 1 patient had a transstoma site approach. The average operation time was 307 minutes, and the patient docking time to the SPR platform was 133.5 minutes. There were no complications during the operation, and no laparoscopy or open conversion. No reoperation occurred within 30 days. Mild postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients. We found that APR has safety and feasibility in surgery using an SPR platform. There was no intraoperative event and severe postoperative complications. rectal neoplasms proctectomy robotic surgical procedure minimally invasive surgical procedures Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology Seong Hyeon Yun verfasserin aut Jung Kyong Shin verfasserin aut Yoon Ah Park verfasserin aut Jung Wook Huh verfasserin aut Yong Beom Cho verfasserin aut Hee Cheol Kim verfasserin aut Woo Yong Lee verfasserin aut In Annals of Coloproctology Korean Society of Coloproctology, 2022 38(2022), 1, Seite 88-92 (DE-627)742225496 (DE-600)2711906-3 22879722 nnns volume:38 year:2022 number:1 pages:88-92 https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d kostenfrei http://coloproctol.org/upload/pdf/ac-2021-00395-0056.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9714 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9722 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 38 2022 1 88-92
allfieldsSound	10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056 doi (DE-627)DOAJ041426614 (DE-599)DOAJ4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC799-869 Moon Suk Choi verfasserin aut Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Recently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From April 2019 to March 2020, APR using a SPR platform was performed in a total of 4 patients. Three patients had a transumbilical approach, and 1 patient had a transstoma site approach. The average operation time was 307 minutes, and the patient docking time to the SPR platform was 133.5 minutes. There were no complications during the operation, and no laparoscopy or open conversion. No reoperation occurred within 30 days. Mild postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients. We found that APR has safety and feasibility in surgery using an SPR platform. There was no intraoperative event and severe postoperative complications. rectal neoplasms proctectomy robotic surgical procedure minimally invasive surgical procedures Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology Seong Hyeon Yun verfasserin aut Jung Kyong Shin verfasserin aut Yoon Ah Park verfasserin aut Jung Wook Huh verfasserin aut Yong Beom Cho verfasserin aut Hee Cheol Kim verfasserin aut Woo Yong Lee verfasserin aut In Annals of Coloproctology Korean Society of Coloproctology, 2022 38(2022), 1, Seite 88-92 (DE-627)742225496 (DE-600)2711906-3 22879722 nnns volume:38 year:2022 number:1 pages:88-92 https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d kostenfrei http://coloproctol.org/upload/pdf/ac-2021-00395-0056.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9714 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9722 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 38 2022 1 88-92
language	English
source	In Annals of Coloproctology 38(2022), 1, Seite 88-92 volume:38 year:2022 number:1 pages:88-92
sourceStr	In Annals of Coloproctology 38(2022), 1, Seite 88-92 volume:38 year:2022 number:1 pages:88-92
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	rectal neoplasms proctectomy robotic surgical procedure minimally invasive surgical procedures Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Annals of Coloproctology
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Moon Suk Choi @@aut@@ Seong Hyeon Yun @@aut@@ Jung Kyong Shin @@aut@@ Yoon Ah Park @@aut@@ Jung Wook Huh @@aut@@ Yong Beom Cho @@aut@@ Hee Cheol Kim @@aut@@ Woo Yong Lee @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	742225496
id	DOAJ041426614
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ041426614</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308050055.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ041426614</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC799-869</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moon Suk Choi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Recently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From April 2019 to March 2020, APR using a SPR platform was performed in a total of 4 patients. Three patients had a transumbilical approach, and 1 patient had a transstoma site approach. The average operation time was 307 minutes, and the patient docking time to the SPR platform was 133.5 minutes. There were no complications during the operation, and no laparoscopy or open conversion. No reoperation occurred within 30 days. Mild postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients. We found that APR has safety and feasibility in surgery using an SPR platform. There was no intraoperative event and severe postoperative complications.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">rectal neoplasms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">proctectomy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">robotic surgical procedure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">minimally invasive surgical procedures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seong Hyeon Yun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jung Kyong Shin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yoon Ah Park</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jung Wook Huh</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yong Beom Cho</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hee Cheol Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Woo Yong Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Annals of Coloproctology</subfield><subfield code="d">Korean Society of Coloproctology, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">38(2022), 1, Seite 88-92</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)742225496</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2711906-3</subfield><subfield code="x">22879722</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:38</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:88-92</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://coloproctol.org/upload/pdf/ac-2021-00395-0056.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9714</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9722</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">38</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">88-92</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Moon Suk Choi
spellingShingle	Moon Suk Choi misc RC799-869 misc rectal neoplasms misc proctectomy misc robotic surgical procedure misc minimally invasive surgical procedures misc Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences
authorStr	Moon Suk Choi
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)742225496
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RC799-869
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	22879722
topic_title	RC799-869 Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences rectal neoplasms proctectomy robotic surgical procedure minimally invasive surgical procedures
topic	misc RC799-869 misc rectal neoplasms misc proctectomy misc robotic surgical procedure misc minimally invasive surgical procedures misc Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
topic_unstemmed	misc RC799-869 misc rectal neoplasms misc proctectomy misc robotic surgical procedure misc minimally invasive surgical procedures misc Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
topic_browse	misc RC799-869 misc rectal neoplasms misc proctectomy misc robotic surgical procedure misc minimally invasive surgical procedures misc Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Annals of Coloproctology
hierarchy_parent_id	742225496
hierarchy_top_title	Annals of Coloproctology
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)742225496 (DE-600)2711906-3
title	Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ041426614 (DE-599)DOAJ4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d
title_full	Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences
author_sort	Moon Suk Choi
journal	Annals of Coloproctology
journalStr	Annals of Coloproctology
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	88
author_browse	Moon Suk Choi Seong Hyeon Yun Jung Kyong Shin Yoon Ah Park Jung Wook Huh Yong Beom Cho Hee Cheol Kim Woo Yong Lee
container_volume	38
class	RC799-869
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Moon Suk Choi
doi_str_mv	10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences
callnumber	RC799-869
title_auth	Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences
abstract	Recently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From April 2019 to March 2020, APR using a SPR platform was performed in a total of 4 patients. Three patients had a transumbilical approach, and 1 patient had a transstoma site approach. The average operation time was 307 minutes, and the patient docking time to the SPR platform was 133.5 minutes. There were no complications during the operation, and no laparoscopy or open conversion. No reoperation occurred within 30 days. Mild postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients. We found that APR has safety and feasibility in surgery using an SPR platform. There was no intraoperative event and severe postoperative complications.
abstractGer	Recently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From April 2019 to March 2020, APR using a SPR platform was performed in a total of 4 patients. Three patients had a transumbilical approach, and 1 patient had a transstoma site approach. The average operation time was 307 minutes, and the patient docking time to the SPR platform was 133.5 minutes. There were no complications during the operation, and no laparoscopy or open conversion. No reoperation occurred within 30 days. Mild postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients. We found that APR has safety and feasibility in surgery using an SPR platform. There was no intraoperative event and severe postoperative complications.
abstract_unstemmed	Recently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From April 2019 to March 2020, APR using a SPR platform was performed in a total of 4 patients. Three patients had a transumbilical approach, and 1 patient had a transstoma site approach. The average operation time was 307 minutes, and the patient docking time to the SPR platform was 133.5 minutes. There were no complications during the operation, and no laparoscopy or open conversion. No reoperation occurred within 30 days. Mild postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients. We found that APR has safety and feasibility in surgery using an SPR platform. There was no intraoperative event and severe postoperative complications.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences
url	https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056 https://doaj.org/article/4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d http://coloproctol.org/upload/pdf/ac-2021-00395-0056.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9714 https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9722
remote_bool	true
author2	Seong Hyeon Yun Jung Kyong Shin Yoon Ah Park Jung Wook Huh Yong Beom Cho Hee Cheol Kim Woo Yong Lee
author2Str	Seong Hyeon Yun Jung Kyong Shin Yoon Ah Park Jung Wook Huh Yong Beom Cho Hee Cheol Kim Woo Yong Lee
ppnlink	742225496
callnumber-subject	RC - Internal Medicine
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056
callnumber-a	RC799-869
up_date	2024-07-03T20:11:38.478Z
_version_	1803590040007213057
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ041426614</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308050055.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ041426614</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC799-869</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moon Suk Choi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Recently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From April 2019 to March 2020, APR using a SPR platform was performed in a total of 4 patients. Three patients had a transumbilical approach, and 1 patient had a transstoma site approach. The average operation time was 307 minutes, and the patient docking time to the SPR platform was 133.5 minutes. There were no complications during the operation, and no laparoscopy or open conversion. No reoperation occurred within 30 days. Mild postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients. We found that APR has safety and feasibility in surgery using an SPR platform. There was no intraoperative event and severe postoperative complications.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">rectal neoplasms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">proctectomy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">robotic surgical procedure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">minimally invasive surgical procedures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seong Hyeon Yun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jung Kyong Shin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yoon Ah Park</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jung Wook Huh</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yong Beom Cho</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hee Cheol Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Woo Yong Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Annals of Coloproctology</subfield><subfield code="d">Korean Society of Coloproctology, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">38(2022), 1, Seite 88-92</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)742225496</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2711906-3</subfield><subfield code="x">22879722</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:38</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:88-92</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://coloproctol.org/upload/pdf/ac-2021-00395-0056.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9714</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2287-9722</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">38</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">88-92</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.398512

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?