Demarcating Popular Education with Government Subsidies: Sweden 1911–1991
By analysing the regulating mechanisms of state subsidies to Swedish institutions generally considered mediating “popular education” during the twentieth century, it is argued that a tension has been developed between two parallel notions of popular education. A narrower ideal popular education—emph...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Samuel Edquist [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Dänisch ; Englisch ; Norwegisch ; Schwedisch |
Erschienen: |
2015 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Nordic Journal of Educational History - Umeå University, 2015, 2(2015), 1 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:2 ; year:2015 ; number:1 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ041855205 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ041855205 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230308052938.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230227s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||dan c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ041855205 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJdd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a dan |a eng |a nor |a swe | ||
050 | 0 | |a LA5-2396 | |
100 | 0 | |a Samuel Edquist |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Demarcating Popular Education with Government Subsidies: Sweden 1911–1991 |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a By analysing the regulating mechanisms of state subsidies to Swedish institutions generally considered mediating “popular education” during the twentieth century, it is argued that a tension has been developed between two parallel notions of popular education. A narrower ideal popular education—emphasising non-formality and independence—has been discursively nurtured along with a broader organisational popular education, denoting the de facto institutions that have received government funding, primarily the folk high schools and study associations. It is argued that the organisational popular education is a reality in itself, spanning over border zones between, for example, non-formal and formal education. Furthermore, an argument against using “popular education” as an analytical concept is put forth, since it is overly contested. Rather, it is promoted as a discursive construct that has formed real organisational structures with their own logic, which cannot be denoted by words such as non-formal adult education. | ||
650 | 4 | |a popular education | |
650 | 4 | |a non-formal adult education | |
650 | 4 | |a economics of education | |
650 | 4 | |a cultural politics | |
650 | 4 | |a Sweden | |
653 | 0 | |a History of education | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Nordic Journal of Educational History |d Umeå University, 2015 |g 2(2015), 1 |w (DE-627)1760617253 |x 20019076 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/dd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://journals.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh/article/view/45 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2001-7766 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2001-9076 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 2 |j 2015 |e 1 |
author_variant |
s e se |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:20019076:2015----::eactnpplrdctowtgvrmnsbii |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
callnumber-subject-code |
LA |
publishDate |
2015 |
allfields |
10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45 doi (DE-627)DOAJ041855205 (DE-599)DOAJdd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb dan eng nor swe LA5-2396 Samuel Edquist verfasserin aut Demarcating Popular Education with Government Subsidies: Sweden 1911–1991 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier By analysing the regulating mechanisms of state subsidies to Swedish institutions generally considered mediating “popular education” during the twentieth century, it is argued that a tension has been developed between two parallel notions of popular education. A narrower ideal popular education—emphasising non-formality and independence—has been discursively nurtured along with a broader organisational popular education, denoting the de facto institutions that have received government funding, primarily the folk high schools and study associations. It is argued that the organisational popular education is a reality in itself, spanning over border zones between, for example, non-formal and formal education. Furthermore, an argument against using “popular education” as an analytical concept is put forth, since it is overly contested. Rather, it is promoted as a discursive construct that has formed real organisational structures with their own logic, which cannot be denoted by words such as non-formal adult education. popular education non-formal adult education economics of education cultural politics Sweden History of education In Nordic Journal of Educational History Umeå University, 2015 2(2015), 1 (DE-627)1760617253 20019076 nnns volume:2 year:2015 number:1 https://doi.org/10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/dd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab kostenfrei http://journals.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh/article/view/45 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2001-7766 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2001-9076 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2 2015 1 |
spelling |
10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45 doi (DE-627)DOAJ041855205 (DE-599)DOAJdd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb dan eng nor swe LA5-2396 Samuel Edquist verfasserin aut Demarcating Popular Education with Government Subsidies: Sweden 1911–1991 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier By analysing the regulating mechanisms of state subsidies to Swedish institutions generally considered mediating “popular education” during the twentieth century, it is argued that a tension has been developed between two parallel notions of popular education. A narrower ideal popular education—emphasising non-formality and independence—has been discursively nurtured along with a broader organisational popular education, denoting the de facto institutions that have received government funding, primarily the folk high schools and study associations. It is argued that the organisational popular education is a reality in itself, spanning over border zones between, for example, non-formal and formal education. Furthermore, an argument against using “popular education” as an analytical concept is put forth, since it is overly contested. Rather, it is promoted as a discursive construct that has formed real organisational structures with their own logic, which cannot be denoted by words such as non-formal adult education. popular education non-formal adult education economics of education cultural politics Sweden History of education In Nordic Journal of Educational History Umeå University, 2015 2(2015), 1 (DE-627)1760617253 20019076 nnns volume:2 year:2015 number:1 https://doi.org/10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/dd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab kostenfrei http://journals.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh/article/view/45 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2001-7766 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2001-9076 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2 2015 1 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45 doi (DE-627)DOAJ041855205 (DE-599)DOAJdd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb dan eng nor swe LA5-2396 Samuel Edquist verfasserin aut Demarcating Popular Education with Government Subsidies: Sweden 1911–1991 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier By analysing the regulating mechanisms of state subsidies to Swedish institutions generally considered mediating “popular education” during the twentieth century, it is argued that a tension has been developed between two parallel notions of popular education. A narrower ideal popular education—emphasising non-formality and independence—has been discursively nurtured along with a broader organisational popular education, denoting the de facto institutions that have received government funding, primarily the folk high schools and study associations. It is argued that the organisational popular education is a reality in itself, spanning over border zones between, for example, non-formal and formal education. Furthermore, an argument against using “popular education” as an analytical concept is put forth, since it is overly contested. Rather, it is promoted as a discursive construct that has formed real organisational structures with their own logic, which cannot be denoted by words such as non-formal adult education. popular education non-formal adult education economics of education cultural politics Sweden History of education In Nordic Journal of Educational History Umeå University, 2015 2(2015), 1 (DE-627)1760617253 20019076 nnns volume:2 year:2015 number:1 https://doi.org/10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/dd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab kostenfrei http://journals.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh/article/view/45 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2001-7766 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2001-9076 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2 2015 1 |
allfieldsGer |
10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45 doi (DE-627)DOAJ041855205 (DE-599)DOAJdd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb dan eng nor swe LA5-2396 Samuel Edquist verfasserin aut Demarcating Popular Education with Government Subsidies: Sweden 1911–1991 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier By analysing the regulating mechanisms of state subsidies to Swedish institutions generally considered mediating “popular education” during the twentieth century, it is argued that a tension has been developed between two parallel notions of popular education. A narrower ideal popular education—emphasising non-formality and independence—has been discursively nurtured along with a broader organisational popular education, denoting the de facto institutions that have received government funding, primarily the folk high schools and study associations. It is argued that the organisational popular education is a reality in itself, spanning over border zones between, for example, non-formal and formal education. Furthermore, an argument against using “popular education” as an analytical concept is put forth, since it is overly contested. Rather, it is promoted as a discursive construct that has formed real organisational structures with their own logic, which cannot be denoted by words such as non-formal adult education. popular education non-formal adult education economics of education cultural politics Sweden History of education In Nordic Journal of Educational History Umeå University, 2015 2(2015), 1 (DE-627)1760617253 20019076 nnns volume:2 year:2015 number:1 https://doi.org/10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/dd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab kostenfrei http://journals.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh/article/view/45 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2001-7766 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2001-9076 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2 2015 1 |
allfieldsSound |
10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45 doi (DE-627)DOAJ041855205 (DE-599)DOAJdd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb dan eng nor swe LA5-2396 Samuel Edquist verfasserin aut Demarcating Popular Education with Government Subsidies: Sweden 1911–1991 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier By analysing the regulating mechanisms of state subsidies to Swedish institutions generally considered mediating “popular education” during the twentieth century, it is argued that a tension has been developed between two parallel notions of popular education. A narrower ideal popular education—emphasising non-formality and independence—has been discursively nurtured along with a broader organisational popular education, denoting the de facto institutions that have received government funding, primarily the folk high schools and study associations. It is argued that the organisational popular education is a reality in itself, spanning over border zones between, for example, non-formal and formal education. Furthermore, an argument against using “popular education” as an analytical concept is put forth, since it is overly contested. Rather, it is promoted as a discursive construct that has formed real organisational structures with their own logic, which cannot be denoted by words such as non-formal adult education. popular education non-formal adult education economics of education cultural politics Sweden History of education In Nordic Journal of Educational History Umeå University, 2015 2(2015), 1 (DE-627)1760617253 20019076 nnns volume:2 year:2015 number:1 https://doi.org/10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/dd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab kostenfrei http://journals.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh/article/view/45 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2001-7766 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2001-9076 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2 2015 1 |
language |
Danish English Norwegian Swedish |
source |
In Nordic Journal of Educational History 2(2015), 1 volume:2 year:2015 number:1 |
sourceStr |
In Nordic Journal of Educational History 2(2015), 1 volume:2 year:2015 number:1 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
popular education non-formal adult education economics of education cultural politics Sweden History of education |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Nordic Journal of Educational History |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Samuel Edquist @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1760617253 |
id |
DOAJ041855205 |
language_de |
daenisch englisch norwegisch schwedisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ041855205</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308052938.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||dan c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ041855205</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJdd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">dan</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">nor</subfield><subfield code="a">swe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">LA5-2396</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Samuel Edquist</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Demarcating Popular Education with Government Subsidies: Sweden 1911–1991</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">By analysing the regulating mechanisms of state subsidies to Swedish institutions generally considered mediating “popular education” during the twentieth century, it is argued that a tension has been developed between two parallel notions of popular education. A narrower ideal popular education—emphasising non-formality and independence—has been discursively nurtured along with a broader organisational popular education, denoting the de facto institutions that have received government funding, primarily the folk high schools and study associations. It is argued that the organisational popular education is a reality in itself, spanning over border zones between, for example, non-formal and formal education. Furthermore, an argument against using “popular education” as an analytical concept is put forth, since it is overly contested. Rather, it is promoted as a discursive construct that has formed real organisational structures with their own logic, which cannot be denoted by words such as non-formal adult education.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">popular education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">non-formal adult education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">economics of education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cultural politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sweden</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">History of education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Nordic Journal of Educational History</subfield><subfield code="d">Umeå University, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">2(2015), 1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760617253</subfield><subfield code="x">20019076</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/dd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh/article/view/45</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2001-7766</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2001-9076</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
L - Education |
author |
Samuel Edquist |
spellingShingle |
Samuel Edquist misc LA5-2396 misc popular education misc non-formal adult education misc economics of education misc cultural politics misc Sweden misc History of education Demarcating Popular Education with Government Subsidies: Sweden 1911–1991 |
authorStr |
Samuel Edquist |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760617253 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
LA5-2396 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
20019076 |
topic_title |
LA5-2396 Demarcating Popular Education with Government Subsidies: Sweden 1911–1991 popular education non-formal adult education economics of education cultural politics Sweden |
topic |
misc LA5-2396 misc popular education misc non-formal adult education misc economics of education misc cultural politics misc Sweden misc History of education |
topic_unstemmed |
misc LA5-2396 misc popular education misc non-formal adult education misc economics of education misc cultural politics misc Sweden misc History of education |
topic_browse |
misc LA5-2396 misc popular education misc non-formal adult education misc economics of education misc cultural politics misc Sweden misc History of education |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Nordic Journal of Educational History |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1760617253 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Nordic Journal of Educational History |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760617253 |
title |
Demarcating Popular Education with Government Subsidies: Sweden 1911–1991 |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ041855205 (DE-599)DOAJdd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab |
title_full |
Demarcating Popular Education with Government Subsidies: Sweden 1911–1991 |
author_sort |
Samuel Edquist |
journal |
Nordic Journal of Educational History |
journalStr |
Nordic Journal of Educational History |
callnumber-first-code |
L |
lang_code |
dan eng nor swe |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2015 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Samuel Edquist |
container_volume |
2 |
class |
LA5-2396 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Samuel Edquist |
doi_str_mv |
10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45 |
title_sort |
demarcating popular education with government subsidies: sweden 1911–1991 |
callnumber |
LA5-2396 |
title_auth |
Demarcating Popular Education with Government Subsidies: Sweden 1911–1991 |
abstract |
By analysing the regulating mechanisms of state subsidies to Swedish institutions generally considered mediating “popular education” during the twentieth century, it is argued that a tension has been developed between two parallel notions of popular education. A narrower ideal popular education—emphasising non-formality and independence—has been discursively nurtured along with a broader organisational popular education, denoting the de facto institutions that have received government funding, primarily the folk high schools and study associations. It is argued that the organisational popular education is a reality in itself, spanning over border zones between, for example, non-formal and formal education. Furthermore, an argument against using “popular education” as an analytical concept is put forth, since it is overly contested. Rather, it is promoted as a discursive construct that has formed real organisational structures with their own logic, which cannot be denoted by words such as non-formal adult education. |
abstractGer |
By analysing the regulating mechanisms of state subsidies to Swedish institutions generally considered mediating “popular education” during the twentieth century, it is argued that a tension has been developed between two parallel notions of popular education. A narrower ideal popular education—emphasising non-formality and independence—has been discursively nurtured along with a broader organisational popular education, denoting the de facto institutions that have received government funding, primarily the folk high schools and study associations. It is argued that the organisational popular education is a reality in itself, spanning over border zones between, for example, non-formal and formal education. Furthermore, an argument against using “popular education” as an analytical concept is put forth, since it is overly contested. Rather, it is promoted as a discursive construct that has formed real organisational structures with their own logic, which cannot be denoted by words such as non-formal adult education. |
abstract_unstemmed |
By analysing the regulating mechanisms of state subsidies to Swedish institutions generally considered mediating “popular education” during the twentieth century, it is argued that a tension has been developed between two parallel notions of popular education. A narrower ideal popular education—emphasising non-formality and independence—has been discursively nurtured along with a broader organisational popular education, denoting the de facto institutions that have received government funding, primarily the folk high schools and study associations. It is argued that the organisational popular education is a reality in itself, spanning over border zones between, for example, non-formal and formal education. Furthermore, an argument against using “popular education” as an analytical concept is put forth, since it is overly contested. Rather, it is promoted as a discursive construct that has formed real organisational structures with their own logic, which cannot be denoted by words such as non-formal adult education. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
container_issue |
1 |
title_short |
Demarcating Popular Education with Government Subsidies: Sweden 1911–1991 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45 https://doaj.org/article/dd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab http://journals.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh/article/view/45 https://doaj.org/toc/2001-7766 https://doaj.org/toc/2001-9076 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
1760617253 |
callnumber-subject |
LA - History of Education |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45 |
callnumber-a |
LA5-2396 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T22:28:43.704Z |
_version_ |
1803598664780742656 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ041855205</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308052938.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||dan c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ041855205</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJdd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">dan</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">nor</subfield><subfield code="a">swe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">LA5-2396</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Samuel Edquist</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Demarcating Popular Education with Government Subsidies: Sweden 1911–1991</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">By analysing the regulating mechanisms of state subsidies to Swedish institutions generally considered mediating “popular education” during the twentieth century, it is argued that a tension has been developed between two parallel notions of popular education. A narrower ideal popular education—emphasising non-formality and independence—has been discursively nurtured along with a broader organisational popular education, denoting the de facto institutions that have received government funding, primarily the folk high schools and study associations. It is argued that the organisational popular education is a reality in itself, spanning over border zones between, for example, non-formal and formal education. Furthermore, an argument against using “popular education” as an analytical concept is put forth, since it is overly contested. Rather, it is promoted as a discursive construct that has formed real organisational structures with their own logic, which cannot be denoted by words such as non-formal adult education.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">popular education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">non-formal adult education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">economics of education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cultural politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sweden</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">History of education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Nordic Journal of Educational History</subfield><subfield code="d">Umeå University, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">2(2015), 1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760617253</subfield><subfield code="x">20019076</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.36368/njedh.v2i1.45</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/dd7da3b07df74cc9b7ab16ff4ed895ab</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.ub.umu.se/index.php/njedh/article/view/45</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2001-7766</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2001-9076</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4001446 |