Spatial Scale Effect and Correction of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Remote Sensing
Forest biomass is critically important for forest dynamics in the carbon cycle. However, large-scale AGB mapping applications from remote sensing data still carry large uncertainty. In this study, an AGB estimation model was first established with three different remote sensing datasets of GF-2, Sen...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Ying Yu [verfasserIn] Yan Pan [verfasserIn] Xiguang Yang [verfasserIn] Wenyi Fan [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Remote Sensing - MDPI AG, 2009, 14(2022), 12, p 2828 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:14 ; year:2022 ; number:12, p 2828 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3390/rs14122828 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ042544157 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ042544157 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240414191751.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230227s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rs14122828 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ042544157 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJf17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 0 | |a Ying Yu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Spatial Scale Effect and Correction of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Remote Sensing |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Forest biomass is critically important for forest dynamics in the carbon cycle. However, large-scale AGB mapping applications from remote sensing data still carry large uncertainty. In this study, an AGB estimation model was first established with three different remote sensing datasets of GF-2, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8. Next, the optimal scale estimation result was considered as a reference AGB to obtain the relative true AGB distribution at different scales based on the law of conservation of mass, and the error of the scale effect of AGB estimation at various spatial resolutions was analyzed. Then, the information entropy of land use type was calculated to identify the heterogeneity of pixels. Finally, a scale conversion method for the entropy-weighted index was developed to correct the scale error of the estimated AGB results from coarse-resolution remote sensing images. The results showed that the random forest model had better prediction accuracy for GF-2 (4 m), Sentinel-2 (10 m) and Landsat-8 (30 m) AGB mapping. The determination coefficient between predicted and measured AGB was 0.5711, 0.4819 and 0.4321, respectively. Compared to uncorrected AGB, R<sup<2</sup< between scale-corrected results and relative true AGB increased from 0.6226 to 0.6725 for Sentinel-2, and increased from 0.5910 to 0.6704 for Landsat-8. The scale error was effectively corrected. This study can provide a reference for forest AGB estimation and scale error reduction for AGB production upscaling with consideration of the spatial heterogeneity of the forest surface. | ||
650 | 4 | |a forest aboveground biomass (AGB) | |
650 | 4 | |a scale effect | |
650 | 4 | |a random forest (RF) | |
650 | 4 | |a scale correction | |
653 | 0 | |a Science | |
653 | 0 | |a Q | |
700 | 0 | |a Yan Pan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Xiguang Yang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Wenyi Fan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Remote Sensing |d MDPI AG, 2009 |g 14(2022), 12, p 2828 |w (DE-627)608937916 |w (DE-600)2513863-7 |x 20724292 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2022 |g number:12, p 2828 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122828 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/f17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/12/2828 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2119 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4392 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 14 |j 2022 |e 12, p 2828 |
author_variant |
y y yy y p yp x y xy w f wf |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:20724292:2022----::ptasaefetncretoofrsaoerudimsetm |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.3390/rs14122828 doi (DE-627)DOAJ042544157 (DE-599)DOAJf17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ying Yu verfasserin aut Spatial Scale Effect and Correction of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Remote Sensing 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Forest biomass is critically important for forest dynamics in the carbon cycle. However, large-scale AGB mapping applications from remote sensing data still carry large uncertainty. In this study, an AGB estimation model was first established with three different remote sensing datasets of GF-2, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8. Next, the optimal scale estimation result was considered as a reference AGB to obtain the relative true AGB distribution at different scales based on the law of conservation of mass, and the error of the scale effect of AGB estimation at various spatial resolutions was analyzed. Then, the information entropy of land use type was calculated to identify the heterogeneity of pixels. Finally, a scale conversion method for the entropy-weighted index was developed to correct the scale error of the estimated AGB results from coarse-resolution remote sensing images. The results showed that the random forest model had better prediction accuracy for GF-2 (4 m), Sentinel-2 (10 m) and Landsat-8 (30 m) AGB mapping. The determination coefficient between predicted and measured AGB was 0.5711, 0.4819 and 0.4321, respectively. Compared to uncorrected AGB, R<sup<2</sup< between scale-corrected results and relative true AGB increased from 0.6226 to 0.6725 for Sentinel-2, and increased from 0.5910 to 0.6704 for Landsat-8. The scale error was effectively corrected. This study can provide a reference for forest AGB estimation and scale error reduction for AGB production upscaling with consideration of the spatial heterogeneity of the forest surface. forest aboveground biomass (AGB) scale effect random forest (RF) scale correction Science Q Yan Pan verfasserin aut Xiguang Yang verfasserin aut Wenyi Fan verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 14(2022), 12, p 2828 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:14 year:2022 number:12, p 2828 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122828 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/12/2828 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2022 12, p 2828 |
spelling |
10.3390/rs14122828 doi (DE-627)DOAJ042544157 (DE-599)DOAJf17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ying Yu verfasserin aut Spatial Scale Effect and Correction of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Remote Sensing 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Forest biomass is critically important for forest dynamics in the carbon cycle. However, large-scale AGB mapping applications from remote sensing data still carry large uncertainty. In this study, an AGB estimation model was first established with three different remote sensing datasets of GF-2, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8. Next, the optimal scale estimation result was considered as a reference AGB to obtain the relative true AGB distribution at different scales based on the law of conservation of mass, and the error of the scale effect of AGB estimation at various spatial resolutions was analyzed. Then, the information entropy of land use type was calculated to identify the heterogeneity of pixels. Finally, a scale conversion method for the entropy-weighted index was developed to correct the scale error of the estimated AGB results from coarse-resolution remote sensing images. The results showed that the random forest model had better prediction accuracy for GF-2 (4 m), Sentinel-2 (10 m) and Landsat-8 (30 m) AGB mapping. The determination coefficient between predicted and measured AGB was 0.5711, 0.4819 and 0.4321, respectively. Compared to uncorrected AGB, R<sup<2</sup< between scale-corrected results and relative true AGB increased from 0.6226 to 0.6725 for Sentinel-2, and increased from 0.5910 to 0.6704 for Landsat-8. The scale error was effectively corrected. This study can provide a reference for forest AGB estimation and scale error reduction for AGB production upscaling with consideration of the spatial heterogeneity of the forest surface. forest aboveground biomass (AGB) scale effect random forest (RF) scale correction Science Q Yan Pan verfasserin aut Xiguang Yang verfasserin aut Wenyi Fan verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 14(2022), 12, p 2828 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:14 year:2022 number:12, p 2828 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122828 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/12/2828 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2022 12, p 2828 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3390/rs14122828 doi (DE-627)DOAJ042544157 (DE-599)DOAJf17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ying Yu verfasserin aut Spatial Scale Effect and Correction of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Remote Sensing 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Forest biomass is critically important for forest dynamics in the carbon cycle. However, large-scale AGB mapping applications from remote sensing data still carry large uncertainty. In this study, an AGB estimation model was first established with three different remote sensing datasets of GF-2, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8. Next, the optimal scale estimation result was considered as a reference AGB to obtain the relative true AGB distribution at different scales based on the law of conservation of mass, and the error of the scale effect of AGB estimation at various spatial resolutions was analyzed. Then, the information entropy of land use type was calculated to identify the heterogeneity of pixels. Finally, a scale conversion method for the entropy-weighted index was developed to correct the scale error of the estimated AGB results from coarse-resolution remote sensing images. The results showed that the random forest model had better prediction accuracy for GF-2 (4 m), Sentinel-2 (10 m) and Landsat-8 (30 m) AGB mapping. The determination coefficient between predicted and measured AGB was 0.5711, 0.4819 and 0.4321, respectively. Compared to uncorrected AGB, R<sup<2</sup< between scale-corrected results and relative true AGB increased from 0.6226 to 0.6725 for Sentinel-2, and increased from 0.5910 to 0.6704 for Landsat-8. The scale error was effectively corrected. This study can provide a reference for forest AGB estimation and scale error reduction for AGB production upscaling with consideration of the spatial heterogeneity of the forest surface. forest aboveground biomass (AGB) scale effect random forest (RF) scale correction Science Q Yan Pan verfasserin aut Xiguang Yang verfasserin aut Wenyi Fan verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 14(2022), 12, p 2828 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:14 year:2022 number:12, p 2828 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122828 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/12/2828 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2022 12, p 2828 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3390/rs14122828 doi (DE-627)DOAJ042544157 (DE-599)DOAJf17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ying Yu verfasserin aut Spatial Scale Effect and Correction of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Remote Sensing 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Forest biomass is critically important for forest dynamics in the carbon cycle. However, large-scale AGB mapping applications from remote sensing data still carry large uncertainty. In this study, an AGB estimation model was first established with three different remote sensing datasets of GF-2, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8. Next, the optimal scale estimation result was considered as a reference AGB to obtain the relative true AGB distribution at different scales based on the law of conservation of mass, and the error of the scale effect of AGB estimation at various spatial resolutions was analyzed. Then, the information entropy of land use type was calculated to identify the heterogeneity of pixels. Finally, a scale conversion method for the entropy-weighted index was developed to correct the scale error of the estimated AGB results from coarse-resolution remote sensing images. The results showed that the random forest model had better prediction accuracy for GF-2 (4 m), Sentinel-2 (10 m) and Landsat-8 (30 m) AGB mapping. The determination coefficient between predicted and measured AGB was 0.5711, 0.4819 and 0.4321, respectively. Compared to uncorrected AGB, R<sup<2</sup< between scale-corrected results and relative true AGB increased from 0.6226 to 0.6725 for Sentinel-2, and increased from 0.5910 to 0.6704 for Landsat-8. The scale error was effectively corrected. This study can provide a reference for forest AGB estimation and scale error reduction for AGB production upscaling with consideration of the spatial heterogeneity of the forest surface. forest aboveground biomass (AGB) scale effect random forest (RF) scale correction Science Q Yan Pan verfasserin aut Xiguang Yang verfasserin aut Wenyi Fan verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 14(2022), 12, p 2828 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:14 year:2022 number:12, p 2828 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122828 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/12/2828 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2022 12, p 2828 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3390/rs14122828 doi (DE-627)DOAJ042544157 (DE-599)DOAJf17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ying Yu verfasserin aut Spatial Scale Effect and Correction of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Remote Sensing 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Forest biomass is critically important for forest dynamics in the carbon cycle. However, large-scale AGB mapping applications from remote sensing data still carry large uncertainty. In this study, an AGB estimation model was first established with three different remote sensing datasets of GF-2, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8. Next, the optimal scale estimation result was considered as a reference AGB to obtain the relative true AGB distribution at different scales based on the law of conservation of mass, and the error of the scale effect of AGB estimation at various spatial resolutions was analyzed. Then, the information entropy of land use type was calculated to identify the heterogeneity of pixels. Finally, a scale conversion method for the entropy-weighted index was developed to correct the scale error of the estimated AGB results from coarse-resolution remote sensing images. The results showed that the random forest model had better prediction accuracy for GF-2 (4 m), Sentinel-2 (10 m) and Landsat-8 (30 m) AGB mapping. The determination coefficient between predicted and measured AGB was 0.5711, 0.4819 and 0.4321, respectively. Compared to uncorrected AGB, R<sup<2</sup< between scale-corrected results and relative true AGB increased from 0.6226 to 0.6725 for Sentinel-2, and increased from 0.5910 to 0.6704 for Landsat-8. The scale error was effectively corrected. This study can provide a reference for forest AGB estimation and scale error reduction for AGB production upscaling with consideration of the spatial heterogeneity of the forest surface. forest aboveground biomass (AGB) scale effect random forest (RF) scale correction Science Q Yan Pan verfasserin aut Xiguang Yang verfasserin aut Wenyi Fan verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 14(2022), 12, p 2828 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:14 year:2022 number:12, p 2828 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122828 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/12/2828 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2022 12, p 2828 |
language |
English |
source |
In Remote Sensing 14(2022), 12, p 2828 volume:14 year:2022 number:12, p 2828 |
sourceStr |
In Remote Sensing 14(2022), 12, p 2828 volume:14 year:2022 number:12, p 2828 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
forest aboveground biomass (AGB) scale effect random forest (RF) scale correction Science Q |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Remote Sensing |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ying Yu @@aut@@ Yan Pan @@aut@@ Xiguang Yang @@aut@@ Wenyi Fan @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
608937916 |
id |
DOAJ042544157 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ042544157</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414191751.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/rs14122828</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ042544157</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJf17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ying Yu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Spatial Scale Effect and Correction of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Remote Sensing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Forest biomass is critically important for forest dynamics in the carbon cycle. However, large-scale AGB mapping applications from remote sensing data still carry large uncertainty. In this study, an AGB estimation model was first established with three different remote sensing datasets of GF-2, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8. Next, the optimal scale estimation result was considered as a reference AGB to obtain the relative true AGB distribution at different scales based on the law of conservation of mass, and the error of the scale effect of AGB estimation at various spatial resolutions was analyzed. Then, the information entropy of land use type was calculated to identify the heterogeneity of pixels. Finally, a scale conversion method for the entropy-weighted index was developed to correct the scale error of the estimated AGB results from coarse-resolution remote sensing images. The results showed that the random forest model had better prediction accuracy for GF-2 (4 m), Sentinel-2 (10 m) and Landsat-8 (30 m) AGB mapping. The determination coefficient between predicted and measured AGB was 0.5711, 0.4819 and 0.4321, respectively. Compared to uncorrected AGB, R<sup<2</sup< between scale-corrected results and relative true AGB increased from 0.6226 to 0.6725 for Sentinel-2, and increased from 0.5910 to 0.6704 for Landsat-8. The scale error was effectively corrected. This study can provide a reference for forest AGB estimation and scale error reduction for AGB production upscaling with consideration of the spatial heterogeneity of the forest surface.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">forest aboveground biomass (AGB)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scale effect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">random forest (RF)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scale correction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Q</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yan Pan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiguang Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wenyi Fan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Remote Sensing</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2022), 12, p 2828</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)608937916</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2513863-7</subfield><subfield code="x">20724292</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:12, p 2828</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122828</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/f17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/12/2828</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">12, p 2828</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Ying Yu |
spellingShingle |
Ying Yu misc forest aboveground biomass (AGB) misc scale effect misc random forest (RF) misc scale correction misc Science misc Q Spatial Scale Effect and Correction of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Remote Sensing |
authorStr |
Ying Yu |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)608937916 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
20724292 |
topic_title |
Spatial Scale Effect and Correction of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Remote Sensing forest aboveground biomass (AGB) scale effect random forest (RF) scale correction |
topic |
misc forest aboveground biomass (AGB) misc scale effect misc random forest (RF) misc scale correction misc Science misc Q |
topic_unstemmed |
misc forest aboveground biomass (AGB) misc scale effect misc random forest (RF) misc scale correction misc Science misc Q |
topic_browse |
misc forest aboveground biomass (AGB) misc scale effect misc random forest (RF) misc scale correction misc Science misc Q |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Remote Sensing |
hierarchy_parent_id |
608937916 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Remote Sensing |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 |
title |
Spatial Scale Effect and Correction of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Remote Sensing |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ042544157 (DE-599)DOAJf17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323 |
title_full |
Spatial Scale Effect and Correction of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Remote Sensing |
author_sort |
Ying Yu |
journal |
Remote Sensing |
journalStr |
Remote Sensing |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Ying Yu Yan Pan Xiguang Yang Wenyi Fan |
container_volume |
14 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Ying Yu |
doi_str_mv |
10.3390/rs14122828 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
spatial scale effect and correction of forest aboveground biomass estimation using remote sensing |
title_auth |
Spatial Scale Effect and Correction of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Remote Sensing |
abstract |
Forest biomass is critically important for forest dynamics in the carbon cycle. However, large-scale AGB mapping applications from remote sensing data still carry large uncertainty. In this study, an AGB estimation model was first established with three different remote sensing datasets of GF-2, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8. Next, the optimal scale estimation result was considered as a reference AGB to obtain the relative true AGB distribution at different scales based on the law of conservation of mass, and the error of the scale effect of AGB estimation at various spatial resolutions was analyzed. Then, the information entropy of land use type was calculated to identify the heterogeneity of pixels. Finally, a scale conversion method for the entropy-weighted index was developed to correct the scale error of the estimated AGB results from coarse-resolution remote sensing images. The results showed that the random forest model had better prediction accuracy for GF-2 (4 m), Sentinel-2 (10 m) and Landsat-8 (30 m) AGB mapping. The determination coefficient between predicted and measured AGB was 0.5711, 0.4819 and 0.4321, respectively. Compared to uncorrected AGB, R<sup<2</sup< between scale-corrected results and relative true AGB increased from 0.6226 to 0.6725 for Sentinel-2, and increased from 0.5910 to 0.6704 for Landsat-8. The scale error was effectively corrected. This study can provide a reference for forest AGB estimation and scale error reduction for AGB production upscaling with consideration of the spatial heterogeneity of the forest surface. |
abstractGer |
Forest biomass is critically important for forest dynamics in the carbon cycle. However, large-scale AGB mapping applications from remote sensing data still carry large uncertainty. In this study, an AGB estimation model was first established with three different remote sensing datasets of GF-2, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8. Next, the optimal scale estimation result was considered as a reference AGB to obtain the relative true AGB distribution at different scales based on the law of conservation of mass, and the error of the scale effect of AGB estimation at various spatial resolutions was analyzed. Then, the information entropy of land use type was calculated to identify the heterogeneity of pixels. Finally, a scale conversion method for the entropy-weighted index was developed to correct the scale error of the estimated AGB results from coarse-resolution remote sensing images. The results showed that the random forest model had better prediction accuracy for GF-2 (4 m), Sentinel-2 (10 m) and Landsat-8 (30 m) AGB mapping. The determination coefficient between predicted and measured AGB was 0.5711, 0.4819 and 0.4321, respectively. Compared to uncorrected AGB, R<sup<2</sup< between scale-corrected results and relative true AGB increased from 0.6226 to 0.6725 for Sentinel-2, and increased from 0.5910 to 0.6704 for Landsat-8. The scale error was effectively corrected. This study can provide a reference for forest AGB estimation and scale error reduction for AGB production upscaling with consideration of the spatial heterogeneity of the forest surface. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Forest biomass is critically important for forest dynamics in the carbon cycle. However, large-scale AGB mapping applications from remote sensing data still carry large uncertainty. In this study, an AGB estimation model was first established with three different remote sensing datasets of GF-2, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8. Next, the optimal scale estimation result was considered as a reference AGB to obtain the relative true AGB distribution at different scales based on the law of conservation of mass, and the error of the scale effect of AGB estimation at various spatial resolutions was analyzed. Then, the information entropy of land use type was calculated to identify the heterogeneity of pixels. Finally, a scale conversion method for the entropy-weighted index was developed to correct the scale error of the estimated AGB results from coarse-resolution remote sensing images. The results showed that the random forest model had better prediction accuracy for GF-2 (4 m), Sentinel-2 (10 m) and Landsat-8 (30 m) AGB mapping. The determination coefficient between predicted and measured AGB was 0.5711, 0.4819 and 0.4321, respectively. Compared to uncorrected AGB, R<sup<2</sup< between scale-corrected results and relative true AGB increased from 0.6226 to 0.6725 for Sentinel-2, and increased from 0.5910 to 0.6704 for Landsat-8. The scale error was effectively corrected. This study can provide a reference for forest AGB estimation and scale error reduction for AGB production upscaling with consideration of the spatial heterogeneity of the forest surface. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
12, p 2828 |
title_short |
Spatial Scale Effect and Correction of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Remote Sensing |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122828 https://doaj.org/article/f17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323 https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/12/2828 https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Yan Pan Xiguang Yang Wenyi Fan |
author2Str |
Yan Pan Xiguang Yang Wenyi Fan |
ppnlink |
608937916 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3390/rs14122828 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T01:21:26.002Z |
_version_ |
1803609530438778880 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ042544157</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414191751.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/rs14122828</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ042544157</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJf17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ying Yu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Spatial Scale Effect and Correction of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Remote Sensing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Forest biomass is critically important for forest dynamics in the carbon cycle. However, large-scale AGB mapping applications from remote sensing data still carry large uncertainty. In this study, an AGB estimation model was first established with three different remote sensing datasets of GF-2, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8. Next, the optimal scale estimation result was considered as a reference AGB to obtain the relative true AGB distribution at different scales based on the law of conservation of mass, and the error of the scale effect of AGB estimation at various spatial resolutions was analyzed. Then, the information entropy of land use type was calculated to identify the heterogeneity of pixels. Finally, a scale conversion method for the entropy-weighted index was developed to correct the scale error of the estimated AGB results from coarse-resolution remote sensing images. The results showed that the random forest model had better prediction accuracy for GF-2 (4 m), Sentinel-2 (10 m) and Landsat-8 (30 m) AGB mapping. The determination coefficient between predicted and measured AGB was 0.5711, 0.4819 and 0.4321, respectively. Compared to uncorrected AGB, R<sup<2</sup< between scale-corrected results and relative true AGB increased from 0.6226 to 0.6725 for Sentinel-2, and increased from 0.5910 to 0.6704 for Landsat-8. The scale error was effectively corrected. This study can provide a reference for forest AGB estimation and scale error reduction for AGB production upscaling with consideration of the spatial heterogeneity of the forest surface.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">forest aboveground biomass (AGB)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scale effect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">random forest (RF)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scale correction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Q</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yan Pan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiguang Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wenyi Fan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Remote Sensing</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2022), 12, p 2828</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)608937916</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2513863-7</subfield><subfield code="x">20724292</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:12, p 2828</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122828</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/f17fb6331ba847978babbf51cbb99323</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/12/2828</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">12, p 2828</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.39983 |