A Method for Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Scientific Mosaic
There are good reasons to think that there was a body of truths generally accepted by the scientific community under Abbasid rule during the middle ages. However, the indicators initially established by the scientonomy community to guide us in reconstructing past mosaics are not applicable in the ca...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Michael Fatigati [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Scientonomy - Scientonomy Community, 2019, 1(2017) |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:1 ; year:2017 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.33137/js.v1i0.27761 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ042998999 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ042998999 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230308065614.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.33137/js.v1i0.27761 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ042998999 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Michael Fatigati |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Method for Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Scientific Mosaic |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a There are good reasons to think that there was a body of truths generally accepted by the scientific community under Abbasid rule during the middle ages. However, the indicators initially established by the scientonomy community to guide us in reconstructing past mosaics are not applicable in the case of the medieval Arabic scientific mosaic. Instead, by attending to the particular way that knowledge was disseminated in this community, we can see the primacy of the concepts passed down in authoritative texts. It is proposed here that a good way of determining which texts, and therefore theories, were accepted would be by tracking the unique record of licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] particular texts that exist from this period. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0003]: Accept the following propositions concerning MASM in c. 750-1258 CE in the Abbasid caliphate: • Authoritative texts are indicative of theories accepted in MASM. • Licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] are reliable indicators of which texts were considered authoritative in MASM. Accept that the following method ought to be employed when reconstructing the theories accepted in MASM: • Teaching License Method: A proposition can be said to be accepted in MASM if the evidence of the licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] indicates so. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a observational scientonomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a indicators of acceptance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a method | |
| 650 | 4 | |a scientific mosaic | |
| 650 | 4 | |a medieval science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Arabic science | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Philosophy. Psychology. Religion | |
| 653 | 0 | |a B | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Scientonomy |d Scientonomy Community, 2019 |g 1(2017) |w (DE-627)1760623709 |x 25609076 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:2017 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.27761 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27761 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 1 |j 2017 | ||
| author_variant |
m f mf |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:25609076:2017----::mtofreosrcighmdeaaais |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.33137/js.v1i0.27761 doi (DE-627)DOAJ042998999 (DE-599)DOAJ32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Michael Fatigati verfasserin aut A Method for Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Scientific Mosaic 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There are good reasons to think that there was a body of truths generally accepted by the scientific community under Abbasid rule during the middle ages. However, the indicators initially established by the scientonomy community to guide us in reconstructing past mosaics are not applicable in the case of the medieval Arabic scientific mosaic. Instead, by attending to the particular way that knowledge was disseminated in this community, we can see the primacy of the concepts passed down in authoritative texts. It is proposed here that a good way of determining which texts, and therefore theories, were accepted would be by tracking the unique record of licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] particular texts that exist from this period. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0003]: Accept the following propositions concerning MASM in c. 750-1258 CE in the Abbasid caliphate: • Authoritative texts are indicative of theories accepted in MASM. • Licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] are reliable indicators of which texts were considered authoritative in MASM. Accept that the following method ought to be employed when reconstructing the theories accepted in MASM: • Teaching License Method: A proposition can be said to be accepted in MASM if the evidence of the licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] indicates so. observational scientonomy indicators of acceptance method scientific mosaic medieval science Arabic science Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B In Scientonomy Scientonomy Community, 2019 1(2017) (DE-627)1760623709 25609076 nnns volume:1 year:2017 https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.27761 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6 kostenfrei https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27761 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2017 |
| spelling |
10.33137/js.v1i0.27761 doi (DE-627)DOAJ042998999 (DE-599)DOAJ32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Michael Fatigati verfasserin aut A Method for Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Scientific Mosaic 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There are good reasons to think that there was a body of truths generally accepted by the scientific community under Abbasid rule during the middle ages. However, the indicators initially established by the scientonomy community to guide us in reconstructing past mosaics are not applicable in the case of the medieval Arabic scientific mosaic. Instead, by attending to the particular way that knowledge was disseminated in this community, we can see the primacy of the concepts passed down in authoritative texts. It is proposed here that a good way of determining which texts, and therefore theories, were accepted would be by tracking the unique record of licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] particular texts that exist from this period. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0003]: Accept the following propositions concerning MASM in c. 750-1258 CE in the Abbasid caliphate: • Authoritative texts are indicative of theories accepted in MASM. • Licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] are reliable indicators of which texts were considered authoritative in MASM. Accept that the following method ought to be employed when reconstructing the theories accepted in MASM: • Teaching License Method: A proposition can be said to be accepted in MASM if the evidence of the licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] indicates so. observational scientonomy indicators of acceptance method scientific mosaic medieval science Arabic science Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B In Scientonomy Scientonomy Community, 2019 1(2017) (DE-627)1760623709 25609076 nnns volume:1 year:2017 https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.27761 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6 kostenfrei https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27761 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2017 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.33137/js.v1i0.27761 doi (DE-627)DOAJ042998999 (DE-599)DOAJ32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Michael Fatigati verfasserin aut A Method for Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Scientific Mosaic 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There are good reasons to think that there was a body of truths generally accepted by the scientific community under Abbasid rule during the middle ages. However, the indicators initially established by the scientonomy community to guide us in reconstructing past mosaics are not applicable in the case of the medieval Arabic scientific mosaic. Instead, by attending to the particular way that knowledge was disseminated in this community, we can see the primacy of the concepts passed down in authoritative texts. It is proposed here that a good way of determining which texts, and therefore theories, were accepted would be by tracking the unique record of licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] particular texts that exist from this period. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0003]: Accept the following propositions concerning MASM in c. 750-1258 CE in the Abbasid caliphate: • Authoritative texts are indicative of theories accepted in MASM. • Licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] are reliable indicators of which texts were considered authoritative in MASM. Accept that the following method ought to be employed when reconstructing the theories accepted in MASM: • Teaching License Method: A proposition can be said to be accepted in MASM if the evidence of the licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] indicates so. observational scientonomy indicators of acceptance method scientific mosaic medieval science Arabic science Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B In Scientonomy Scientonomy Community, 2019 1(2017) (DE-627)1760623709 25609076 nnns volume:1 year:2017 https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.27761 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6 kostenfrei https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27761 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2017 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.33137/js.v1i0.27761 doi (DE-627)DOAJ042998999 (DE-599)DOAJ32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Michael Fatigati verfasserin aut A Method for Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Scientific Mosaic 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There are good reasons to think that there was a body of truths generally accepted by the scientific community under Abbasid rule during the middle ages. However, the indicators initially established by the scientonomy community to guide us in reconstructing past mosaics are not applicable in the case of the medieval Arabic scientific mosaic. Instead, by attending to the particular way that knowledge was disseminated in this community, we can see the primacy of the concepts passed down in authoritative texts. It is proposed here that a good way of determining which texts, and therefore theories, were accepted would be by tracking the unique record of licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] particular texts that exist from this period. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0003]: Accept the following propositions concerning MASM in c. 750-1258 CE in the Abbasid caliphate: • Authoritative texts are indicative of theories accepted in MASM. • Licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] are reliable indicators of which texts were considered authoritative in MASM. Accept that the following method ought to be employed when reconstructing the theories accepted in MASM: • Teaching License Method: A proposition can be said to be accepted in MASM if the evidence of the licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] indicates so. observational scientonomy indicators of acceptance method scientific mosaic medieval science Arabic science Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B In Scientonomy Scientonomy Community, 2019 1(2017) (DE-627)1760623709 25609076 nnns volume:1 year:2017 https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.27761 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6 kostenfrei https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27761 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2017 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.33137/js.v1i0.27761 doi (DE-627)DOAJ042998999 (DE-599)DOAJ32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Michael Fatigati verfasserin aut A Method for Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Scientific Mosaic 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There are good reasons to think that there was a body of truths generally accepted by the scientific community under Abbasid rule during the middle ages. However, the indicators initially established by the scientonomy community to guide us in reconstructing past mosaics are not applicable in the case of the medieval Arabic scientific mosaic. Instead, by attending to the particular way that knowledge was disseminated in this community, we can see the primacy of the concepts passed down in authoritative texts. It is proposed here that a good way of determining which texts, and therefore theories, were accepted would be by tracking the unique record of licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] particular texts that exist from this period. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0003]: Accept the following propositions concerning MASM in c. 750-1258 CE in the Abbasid caliphate: • Authoritative texts are indicative of theories accepted in MASM. • Licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] are reliable indicators of which texts were considered authoritative in MASM. Accept that the following method ought to be employed when reconstructing the theories accepted in MASM: • Teaching License Method: A proposition can be said to be accepted in MASM if the evidence of the licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] indicates so. observational scientonomy indicators of acceptance method scientific mosaic medieval science Arabic science Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B In Scientonomy Scientonomy Community, 2019 1(2017) (DE-627)1760623709 25609076 nnns volume:1 year:2017 https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.27761 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6 kostenfrei https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27761 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2017 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Scientonomy 1(2017) volume:1 year:2017 |
| sourceStr |
In Scientonomy 1(2017) volume:1 year:2017 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
observational scientonomy indicators of acceptance method scientific mosaic medieval science Arabic science Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Scientonomy |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Michael Fatigati @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760623709 |
| id |
DOAJ042998999 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ042998999</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308065614.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.33137/js.v1i0.27761</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ042998999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michael Fatigati</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A Method for Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Scientific Mosaic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There are good reasons to think that there was a body of truths generally accepted by the scientific community under Abbasid rule during the middle ages. However, the indicators initially established by the scientonomy community to guide us in reconstructing past mosaics are not applicable in the case of the medieval Arabic scientific mosaic. Instead, by attending to the particular way that knowledge was disseminated in this community, we can see the primacy of the concepts passed down in authoritative texts. It is proposed here that a good way of determining which texts, and therefore theories, were accepted would be by tracking the unique record of licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] particular texts that exist from this period. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0003]: Accept the following propositions concerning MASM in c. 750-1258 CE in the Abbasid caliphate: • Authoritative texts are indicative of theories accepted in MASM. • Licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] are reliable indicators of which texts were considered authoritative in MASM. Accept that the following method ought to be employed when reconstructing the theories accepted in MASM: • Teaching License Method: A proposition can be said to be accepted in MASM if the evidence of the licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] indicates so.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">observational scientonomy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">indicators of acceptance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scientific mosaic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">medieval science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arabic science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy. Psychology. Religion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Scientonomy</subfield><subfield code="d">Scientonomy Community, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2017)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760623709</subfield><subfield code="x">25609076</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.27761</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27761</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Michael Fatigati |
| spellingShingle |
Michael Fatigati misc observational scientonomy misc indicators of acceptance misc method misc scientific mosaic misc medieval science misc Arabic science misc Philosophy. Psychology. Religion misc B A Method for Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Scientific Mosaic |
| authorStr |
Michael Fatigati |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760623709 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
25609076 |
| topic_title |
A Method for Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Scientific Mosaic observational scientonomy indicators of acceptance method scientific mosaic medieval science Arabic science |
| topic |
misc observational scientonomy misc indicators of acceptance misc method misc scientific mosaic misc medieval science misc Arabic science misc Philosophy. Psychology. Religion misc B |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc observational scientonomy misc indicators of acceptance misc method misc scientific mosaic misc medieval science misc Arabic science misc Philosophy. Psychology. Religion misc B |
| topic_browse |
misc observational scientonomy misc indicators of acceptance misc method misc scientific mosaic misc medieval science misc Arabic science misc Philosophy. Psychology. Religion misc B |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Scientonomy |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760623709 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Scientonomy |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760623709 |
| title |
A Method for Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Scientific Mosaic |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ042998999 (DE-599)DOAJ32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6 |
| title_full |
A Method for Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Scientific Mosaic |
| author_sort |
Michael Fatigati |
| journal |
Scientonomy |
| journalStr |
Scientonomy |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Michael Fatigati |
| container_volume |
1 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Michael Fatigati |
| doi_str_mv |
10.33137/js.v1i0.27761 |
| title_sort |
method for reconstructing the medieval arabic scientific mosaic |
| title_auth |
A Method for Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Scientific Mosaic |
| abstract |
There are good reasons to think that there was a body of truths generally accepted by the scientific community under Abbasid rule during the middle ages. However, the indicators initially established by the scientonomy community to guide us in reconstructing past mosaics are not applicable in the case of the medieval Arabic scientific mosaic. Instead, by attending to the particular way that knowledge was disseminated in this community, we can see the primacy of the concepts passed down in authoritative texts. It is proposed here that a good way of determining which texts, and therefore theories, were accepted would be by tracking the unique record of licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] particular texts that exist from this period. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0003]: Accept the following propositions concerning MASM in c. 750-1258 CE in the Abbasid caliphate: • Authoritative texts are indicative of theories accepted in MASM. • Licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] are reliable indicators of which texts were considered authoritative in MASM. Accept that the following method ought to be employed when reconstructing the theories accepted in MASM: • Teaching License Method: A proposition can be said to be accepted in MASM if the evidence of the licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] indicates so. |
| abstractGer |
There are good reasons to think that there was a body of truths generally accepted by the scientific community under Abbasid rule during the middle ages. However, the indicators initially established by the scientonomy community to guide us in reconstructing past mosaics are not applicable in the case of the medieval Arabic scientific mosaic. Instead, by attending to the particular way that knowledge was disseminated in this community, we can see the primacy of the concepts passed down in authoritative texts. It is proposed here that a good way of determining which texts, and therefore theories, were accepted would be by tracking the unique record of licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] particular texts that exist from this period. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0003]: Accept the following propositions concerning MASM in c. 750-1258 CE in the Abbasid caliphate: • Authoritative texts are indicative of theories accepted in MASM. • Licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] are reliable indicators of which texts were considered authoritative in MASM. Accept that the following method ought to be employed when reconstructing the theories accepted in MASM: • Teaching License Method: A proposition can be said to be accepted in MASM if the evidence of the licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] indicates so. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
There are good reasons to think that there was a body of truths generally accepted by the scientific community under Abbasid rule during the middle ages. However, the indicators initially established by the scientonomy community to guide us in reconstructing past mosaics are not applicable in the case of the medieval Arabic scientific mosaic. Instead, by attending to the particular way that knowledge was disseminated in this community, we can see the primacy of the concepts passed down in authoritative texts. It is proposed here that a good way of determining which texts, and therefore theories, were accepted would be by tracking the unique record of licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] particular texts that exist from this period. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0003]: Accept the following propositions concerning MASM in c. 750-1258 CE in the Abbasid caliphate: • Authoritative texts are indicative of theories accepted in MASM. • Licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] are reliable indicators of which texts were considered authoritative in MASM. Accept that the following method ought to be employed when reconstructing the theories accepted in MASM: • Teaching License Method: A proposition can be said to be accepted in MASM if the evidence of the licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] indicates so. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| title_short |
A Method for Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Scientific Mosaic |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.27761 https://doaj.org/article/32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6 https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27761 https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
1760623709 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.33137/js.v1i0.27761 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T15:09:17.169Z |
| _version_ |
1803571017469132800 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ042998999</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308065614.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.33137/js.v1i0.27761</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ042998999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michael Fatigati</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A Method for Reconstructing the Medieval Arabic Scientific Mosaic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There are good reasons to think that there was a body of truths generally accepted by the scientific community under Abbasid rule during the middle ages. However, the indicators initially established by the scientonomy community to guide us in reconstructing past mosaics are not applicable in the case of the medieval Arabic scientific mosaic. Instead, by attending to the particular way that knowledge was disseminated in this community, we can see the primacy of the concepts passed down in authoritative texts. It is proposed here that a good way of determining which texts, and therefore theories, were accepted would be by tracking the unique record of licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] particular texts that exist from this period. Suggested Modifications [Sciento-2017-0003]: Accept the following propositions concerning MASM in c. 750-1258 CE in the Abbasid caliphate: • Authoritative texts are indicative of theories accepted in MASM. • Licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] are reliable indicators of which texts were considered authoritative in MASM. Accept that the following method ought to be employed when reconstructing the theories accepted in MASM: • Teaching License Method: A proposition can be said to be accepted in MASM if the evidence of the licenses to teach [ʾijāzāt] indicates so.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">observational scientonomy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">indicators of acceptance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scientific mosaic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">medieval science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arabic science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy. Psychology. Religion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Scientonomy</subfield><subfield code="d">Scientonomy Community, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2017)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760623709</subfield><subfield code="x">25609076</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.33137/js.v1i0.27761</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/32770125c4d342a6aaf55e23971df3f6</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27761</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2560-9076</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.397353 |