Evaluating intraoperative cytology with histopathology diagnosis and its importance in ovarian tumors
Background: Touch/ imprint cytology has been utilized for intraoperative evaluations of tumors to complement frozen sections in order to reach diagnosis prior to histopathology diagnosis. The main aim of this study is to find role of touch imprint in determining histopathology diagnosis of ovarian n...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Karishma Malla Vaidya [verfasserIn] Bigya Shrestha [verfasserIn] Runa Jha [verfasserIn] Binit Shrestha [verfasserIn] Aasiya Rajbhandari [verfasserIn] Rizuta Joshi [verfasserIn] Kirtipal Subedi [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of Pathology of Nepal - Association of Clinical Pathologists of Nepal, 2017, 10(2020), 1, Seite 1630-1634 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:10 ; year:2020 ; number:1 ; pages:1630-1634 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ043596088 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ043596088 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503102326.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ043596088 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a RB1-214 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Karishma Malla Vaidya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluating intraoperative cytology with histopathology diagnosis and its importance in ovarian tumors |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Background: Touch/ imprint cytology has been utilized for intraoperative evaluations of tumors to complement frozen sections in order to reach diagnosis prior to histopathology diagnosis. The main aim of this study is to find role of touch imprint in determining histopathology diagnosis of ovarian neoplasm. Materials and Methods: All together one hundred three cases were evaluated using both touch/imprint and histopathology diagnosis. The histopathology diagnoses consisted of Benign (n=85), borderline (n=4), and malignant (n=12). Touch imprint cytology consists of Negative for malignancy (n=90), Positive for malignancy (n=11) and inadequate (n=2). Inadequate smear was excluded from the study. Results: Both touch / imprint cytology were able to diagnose benign and malignant ovarian neoplasm. Out of 103 cases, in cytology showed 89.1% patients were negative and 10.9% patients were positive. Histopathology shows 84.2% of benign ovarian neoplasm, 3.9% borderline neoplasm and 11.9% of malignant. Diagnostic accuracy of touch/ imprint was 99% with sensitivity 100% and specificity was 91.67%. Positive predictive value was 98.89% and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusion: Touch/ imprint cytology examination is simple, rapid and useful test in evaluation of ovarian neoplasms. It plays very important role in preliminary intraoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a histology diagnosis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a interaoperative diagnosis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ovarian neoplasm | |
| 650 | 4 | |a touch imprint | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Pathology | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Bigya Shrestha |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Runa Jha |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Binit Shrestha |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Aasiya Rajbhandari |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Rizuta Joshi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Kirtipal Subedi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of Pathology of Nepal |d Association of Clinical Pathologists of Nepal, 2017 |g 10(2020), 1, Seite 1630-1634 |w (DE-627)1760637777 |x 20910908 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g pages:1630-1634 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JPN/article/view/27551 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0797 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0908 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 10 |j 2020 |e 1 |h 1630-1634 | ||
| author_variant |
k m v kmv b s bs r j rj b s bs a r ar r j rj k s ks |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:20910908:2020----::vlaignroeaieyooyihitptooyigoiadti |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
RB |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551 doi (DE-627)DOAJ043596088 (DE-599)DOAJ723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RB1-214 Karishma Malla Vaidya verfasserin aut Evaluating intraoperative cytology with histopathology diagnosis and its importance in ovarian tumors 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Touch/ imprint cytology has been utilized for intraoperative evaluations of tumors to complement frozen sections in order to reach diagnosis prior to histopathology diagnosis. The main aim of this study is to find role of touch imprint in determining histopathology diagnosis of ovarian neoplasm. Materials and Methods: All together one hundred three cases were evaluated using both touch/imprint and histopathology diagnosis. The histopathology diagnoses consisted of Benign (n=85), borderline (n=4), and malignant (n=12). Touch imprint cytology consists of Negative for malignancy (n=90), Positive for malignancy (n=11) and inadequate (n=2). Inadequate smear was excluded from the study. Results: Both touch / imprint cytology were able to diagnose benign and malignant ovarian neoplasm. Out of 103 cases, in cytology showed 89.1% patients were negative and 10.9% patients were positive. Histopathology shows 84.2% of benign ovarian neoplasm, 3.9% borderline neoplasm and 11.9% of malignant. Diagnostic accuracy of touch/ imprint was 99% with sensitivity 100% and specificity was 91.67%. Positive predictive value was 98.89% and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusion: Touch/ imprint cytology examination is simple, rapid and useful test in evaluation of ovarian neoplasms. It plays very important role in preliminary intraoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms. histology diagnosis interaoperative diagnosis ovarian neoplasm touch imprint Pathology Bigya Shrestha verfasserin aut Runa Jha verfasserin aut Binit Shrestha verfasserin aut Aasiya Rajbhandari verfasserin aut Rizuta Joshi verfasserin aut Kirtipal Subedi verfasserin aut In Journal of Pathology of Nepal Association of Clinical Pathologists of Nepal, 2017 10(2020), 1, Seite 1630-1634 (DE-627)1760637777 20910908 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:1 pages:1630-1634 https://doi.org/10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50 kostenfrei https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JPN/article/view/27551 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0797 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0908 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 10 2020 1 1630-1634 |
| spelling |
10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551 doi (DE-627)DOAJ043596088 (DE-599)DOAJ723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RB1-214 Karishma Malla Vaidya verfasserin aut Evaluating intraoperative cytology with histopathology diagnosis and its importance in ovarian tumors 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Touch/ imprint cytology has been utilized for intraoperative evaluations of tumors to complement frozen sections in order to reach diagnosis prior to histopathology diagnosis. The main aim of this study is to find role of touch imprint in determining histopathology diagnosis of ovarian neoplasm. Materials and Methods: All together one hundred three cases were evaluated using both touch/imprint and histopathology diagnosis. The histopathology diagnoses consisted of Benign (n=85), borderline (n=4), and malignant (n=12). Touch imprint cytology consists of Negative for malignancy (n=90), Positive for malignancy (n=11) and inadequate (n=2). Inadequate smear was excluded from the study. Results: Both touch / imprint cytology were able to diagnose benign and malignant ovarian neoplasm. Out of 103 cases, in cytology showed 89.1% patients were negative and 10.9% patients were positive. Histopathology shows 84.2% of benign ovarian neoplasm, 3.9% borderline neoplasm and 11.9% of malignant. Diagnostic accuracy of touch/ imprint was 99% with sensitivity 100% and specificity was 91.67%. Positive predictive value was 98.89% and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusion: Touch/ imprint cytology examination is simple, rapid and useful test in evaluation of ovarian neoplasms. It plays very important role in preliminary intraoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms. histology diagnosis interaoperative diagnosis ovarian neoplasm touch imprint Pathology Bigya Shrestha verfasserin aut Runa Jha verfasserin aut Binit Shrestha verfasserin aut Aasiya Rajbhandari verfasserin aut Rizuta Joshi verfasserin aut Kirtipal Subedi verfasserin aut In Journal of Pathology of Nepal Association of Clinical Pathologists of Nepal, 2017 10(2020), 1, Seite 1630-1634 (DE-627)1760637777 20910908 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:1 pages:1630-1634 https://doi.org/10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50 kostenfrei https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JPN/article/view/27551 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0797 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0908 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 10 2020 1 1630-1634 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551 doi (DE-627)DOAJ043596088 (DE-599)DOAJ723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RB1-214 Karishma Malla Vaidya verfasserin aut Evaluating intraoperative cytology with histopathology diagnosis and its importance in ovarian tumors 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Touch/ imprint cytology has been utilized for intraoperative evaluations of tumors to complement frozen sections in order to reach diagnosis prior to histopathology diagnosis. The main aim of this study is to find role of touch imprint in determining histopathology diagnosis of ovarian neoplasm. Materials and Methods: All together one hundred three cases were evaluated using both touch/imprint and histopathology diagnosis. The histopathology diagnoses consisted of Benign (n=85), borderline (n=4), and malignant (n=12). Touch imprint cytology consists of Negative for malignancy (n=90), Positive for malignancy (n=11) and inadequate (n=2). Inadequate smear was excluded from the study. Results: Both touch / imprint cytology were able to diagnose benign and malignant ovarian neoplasm. Out of 103 cases, in cytology showed 89.1% patients were negative and 10.9% patients were positive. Histopathology shows 84.2% of benign ovarian neoplasm, 3.9% borderline neoplasm and 11.9% of malignant. Diagnostic accuracy of touch/ imprint was 99% with sensitivity 100% and specificity was 91.67%. Positive predictive value was 98.89% and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusion: Touch/ imprint cytology examination is simple, rapid and useful test in evaluation of ovarian neoplasms. It plays very important role in preliminary intraoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms. histology diagnosis interaoperative diagnosis ovarian neoplasm touch imprint Pathology Bigya Shrestha verfasserin aut Runa Jha verfasserin aut Binit Shrestha verfasserin aut Aasiya Rajbhandari verfasserin aut Rizuta Joshi verfasserin aut Kirtipal Subedi verfasserin aut In Journal of Pathology of Nepal Association of Clinical Pathologists of Nepal, 2017 10(2020), 1, Seite 1630-1634 (DE-627)1760637777 20910908 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:1 pages:1630-1634 https://doi.org/10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50 kostenfrei https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JPN/article/view/27551 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0797 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0908 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 10 2020 1 1630-1634 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551 doi (DE-627)DOAJ043596088 (DE-599)DOAJ723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RB1-214 Karishma Malla Vaidya verfasserin aut Evaluating intraoperative cytology with histopathology diagnosis and its importance in ovarian tumors 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Touch/ imprint cytology has been utilized for intraoperative evaluations of tumors to complement frozen sections in order to reach diagnosis prior to histopathology diagnosis. The main aim of this study is to find role of touch imprint in determining histopathology diagnosis of ovarian neoplasm. Materials and Methods: All together one hundred three cases were evaluated using both touch/imprint and histopathology diagnosis. The histopathology diagnoses consisted of Benign (n=85), borderline (n=4), and malignant (n=12). Touch imprint cytology consists of Negative for malignancy (n=90), Positive for malignancy (n=11) and inadequate (n=2). Inadequate smear was excluded from the study. Results: Both touch / imprint cytology were able to diagnose benign and malignant ovarian neoplasm. Out of 103 cases, in cytology showed 89.1% patients were negative and 10.9% patients were positive. Histopathology shows 84.2% of benign ovarian neoplasm, 3.9% borderline neoplasm and 11.9% of malignant. Diagnostic accuracy of touch/ imprint was 99% with sensitivity 100% and specificity was 91.67%. Positive predictive value was 98.89% and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusion: Touch/ imprint cytology examination is simple, rapid and useful test in evaluation of ovarian neoplasms. It plays very important role in preliminary intraoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms. histology diagnosis interaoperative diagnosis ovarian neoplasm touch imprint Pathology Bigya Shrestha verfasserin aut Runa Jha verfasserin aut Binit Shrestha verfasserin aut Aasiya Rajbhandari verfasserin aut Rizuta Joshi verfasserin aut Kirtipal Subedi verfasserin aut In Journal of Pathology of Nepal Association of Clinical Pathologists of Nepal, 2017 10(2020), 1, Seite 1630-1634 (DE-627)1760637777 20910908 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:1 pages:1630-1634 https://doi.org/10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50 kostenfrei https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JPN/article/view/27551 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0797 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0908 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 10 2020 1 1630-1634 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551 doi (DE-627)DOAJ043596088 (DE-599)DOAJ723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RB1-214 Karishma Malla Vaidya verfasserin aut Evaluating intraoperative cytology with histopathology diagnosis and its importance in ovarian tumors 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Touch/ imprint cytology has been utilized for intraoperative evaluations of tumors to complement frozen sections in order to reach diagnosis prior to histopathology diagnosis. The main aim of this study is to find role of touch imprint in determining histopathology diagnosis of ovarian neoplasm. Materials and Methods: All together one hundred three cases were evaluated using both touch/imprint and histopathology diagnosis. The histopathology diagnoses consisted of Benign (n=85), borderline (n=4), and malignant (n=12). Touch imprint cytology consists of Negative for malignancy (n=90), Positive for malignancy (n=11) and inadequate (n=2). Inadequate smear was excluded from the study. Results: Both touch / imprint cytology were able to diagnose benign and malignant ovarian neoplasm. Out of 103 cases, in cytology showed 89.1% patients were negative and 10.9% patients were positive. Histopathology shows 84.2% of benign ovarian neoplasm, 3.9% borderline neoplasm and 11.9% of malignant. Diagnostic accuracy of touch/ imprint was 99% with sensitivity 100% and specificity was 91.67%. Positive predictive value was 98.89% and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusion: Touch/ imprint cytology examination is simple, rapid and useful test in evaluation of ovarian neoplasms. It plays very important role in preliminary intraoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms. histology diagnosis interaoperative diagnosis ovarian neoplasm touch imprint Pathology Bigya Shrestha verfasserin aut Runa Jha verfasserin aut Binit Shrestha verfasserin aut Aasiya Rajbhandari verfasserin aut Rizuta Joshi verfasserin aut Kirtipal Subedi verfasserin aut In Journal of Pathology of Nepal Association of Clinical Pathologists of Nepal, 2017 10(2020), 1, Seite 1630-1634 (DE-627)1760637777 20910908 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:1 pages:1630-1634 https://doi.org/10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50 kostenfrei https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JPN/article/view/27551 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0797 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0908 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 10 2020 1 1630-1634 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Journal of Pathology of Nepal 10(2020), 1, Seite 1630-1634 volume:10 year:2020 number:1 pages:1630-1634 |
| sourceStr |
In Journal of Pathology of Nepal 10(2020), 1, Seite 1630-1634 volume:10 year:2020 number:1 pages:1630-1634 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
histology diagnosis interaoperative diagnosis ovarian neoplasm touch imprint Pathology |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Journal of Pathology of Nepal |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Karishma Malla Vaidya @@aut@@ Bigya Shrestha @@aut@@ Runa Jha @@aut@@ Binit Shrestha @@aut@@ Aasiya Rajbhandari @@aut@@ Rizuta Joshi @@aut@@ Kirtipal Subedi @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760637777 |
| id |
DOAJ043596088 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ043596088</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503102326.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ043596088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RB1-214</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Karishma Malla Vaidya</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluating intraoperative cytology with histopathology diagnosis and its importance in ovarian tumors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: Touch/ imprint cytology has been utilized for intraoperative evaluations of tumors to complement frozen sections in order to reach diagnosis prior to histopathology diagnosis. The main aim of this study is to find role of touch imprint in determining histopathology diagnosis of ovarian neoplasm. Materials and Methods: All together one hundred three cases were evaluated using both touch/imprint and histopathology diagnosis. The histopathology diagnoses consisted of Benign (n=85), borderline (n=4), and malignant (n=12). Touch imprint cytology consists of Negative for malignancy (n=90), Positive for malignancy (n=11) and inadequate (n=2). Inadequate smear was excluded from the study. Results: Both touch / imprint cytology were able to diagnose benign and malignant ovarian neoplasm. Out of 103 cases, in cytology showed 89.1% patients were negative and 10.9% patients were positive. Histopathology shows 84.2% of benign ovarian neoplasm, 3.9% borderline neoplasm and 11.9% of malignant. Diagnostic accuracy of touch/ imprint was 99% with sensitivity 100% and specificity was 91.67%. Positive predictive value was 98.89% and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusion: Touch/ imprint cytology examination is simple, rapid and useful test in evaluation of ovarian neoplasms. It plays very important role in preliminary intraoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">histology diagnosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">interaoperative diagnosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ovarian neoplasm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">touch imprint</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pathology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bigya Shrestha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Runa Jha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Binit Shrestha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aasiya Rajbhandari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rizuta Joshi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kirtipal Subedi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Pathology of Nepal</subfield><subfield code="d">Association of Clinical Pathologists of Nepal, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2020), 1, Seite 1630-1634</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760637777</subfield><subfield code="x">20910908</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1630-1634</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JPN/article/view/27551</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0797</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0908</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">1630-1634</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
| author |
Karishma Malla Vaidya |
| spellingShingle |
Karishma Malla Vaidya misc RB1-214 misc histology diagnosis misc interaoperative diagnosis misc ovarian neoplasm misc touch imprint misc Pathology Evaluating intraoperative cytology with histopathology diagnosis and its importance in ovarian tumors |
| authorStr |
Karishma Malla Vaidya |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760637777 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
RB1-214 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
20910908 |
| topic_title |
RB1-214 Evaluating intraoperative cytology with histopathology diagnosis and its importance in ovarian tumors histology diagnosis interaoperative diagnosis ovarian neoplasm touch imprint |
| topic |
misc RB1-214 misc histology diagnosis misc interaoperative diagnosis misc ovarian neoplasm misc touch imprint misc Pathology |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc RB1-214 misc histology diagnosis misc interaoperative diagnosis misc ovarian neoplasm misc touch imprint misc Pathology |
| topic_browse |
misc RB1-214 misc histology diagnosis misc interaoperative diagnosis misc ovarian neoplasm misc touch imprint misc Pathology |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of Pathology of Nepal |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760637777 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of Pathology of Nepal |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760637777 |
| title |
Evaluating intraoperative cytology with histopathology diagnosis and its importance in ovarian tumors |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ043596088 (DE-599)DOAJ723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50 |
| title_full |
Evaluating intraoperative cytology with histopathology diagnosis and its importance in ovarian tumors |
| author_sort |
Karishma Malla Vaidya |
| journal |
Journal of Pathology of Nepal |
| journalStr |
Journal of Pathology of Nepal |
| callnumber-first-code |
R |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1630 |
| author_browse |
Karishma Malla Vaidya Bigya Shrestha Runa Jha Binit Shrestha Aasiya Rajbhandari Rizuta Joshi Kirtipal Subedi |
| container_volume |
10 |
| class |
RB1-214 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Karishma Malla Vaidya |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
evaluating intraoperative cytology with histopathology diagnosis and its importance in ovarian tumors |
| callnumber |
RB1-214 |
| title_auth |
Evaluating intraoperative cytology with histopathology diagnosis and its importance in ovarian tumors |
| abstract |
Background: Touch/ imprint cytology has been utilized for intraoperative evaluations of tumors to complement frozen sections in order to reach diagnosis prior to histopathology diagnosis. The main aim of this study is to find role of touch imprint in determining histopathology diagnosis of ovarian neoplasm. Materials and Methods: All together one hundred three cases were evaluated using both touch/imprint and histopathology diagnosis. The histopathology diagnoses consisted of Benign (n=85), borderline (n=4), and malignant (n=12). Touch imprint cytology consists of Negative for malignancy (n=90), Positive for malignancy (n=11) and inadequate (n=2). Inadequate smear was excluded from the study. Results: Both touch / imprint cytology were able to diagnose benign and malignant ovarian neoplasm. Out of 103 cases, in cytology showed 89.1% patients were negative and 10.9% patients were positive. Histopathology shows 84.2% of benign ovarian neoplasm, 3.9% borderline neoplasm and 11.9% of malignant. Diagnostic accuracy of touch/ imprint was 99% with sensitivity 100% and specificity was 91.67%. Positive predictive value was 98.89% and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusion: Touch/ imprint cytology examination is simple, rapid and useful test in evaluation of ovarian neoplasms. It plays very important role in preliminary intraoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms. |
| abstractGer |
Background: Touch/ imprint cytology has been utilized for intraoperative evaluations of tumors to complement frozen sections in order to reach diagnosis prior to histopathology diagnosis. The main aim of this study is to find role of touch imprint in determining histopathology diagnosis of ovarian neoplasm. Materials and Methods: All together one hundred three cases were evaluated using both touch/imprint and histopathology diagnosis. The histopathology diagnoses consisted of Benign (n=85), borderline (n=4), and malignant (n=12). Touch imprint cytology consists of Negative for malignancy (n=90), Positive for malignancy (n=11) and inadequate (n=2). Inadequate smear was excluded from the study. Results: Both touch / imprint cytology were able to diagnose benign and malignant ovarian neoplasm. Out of 103 cases, in cytology showed 89.1% patients were negative and 10.9% patients were positive. Histopathology shows 84.2% of benign ovarian neoplasm, 3.9% borderline neoplasm and 11.9% of malignant. Diagnostic accuracy of touch/ imprint was 99% with sensitivity 100% and specificity was 91.67%. Positive predictive value was 98.89% and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusion: Touch/ imprint cytology examination is simple, rapid and useful test in evaluation of ovarian neoplasms. It plays very important role in preliminary intraoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Background: Touch/ imprint cytology has been utilized for intraoperative evaluations of tumors to complement frozen sections in order to reach diagnosis prior to histopathology diagnosis. The main aim of this study is to find role of touch imprint in determining histopathology diagnosis of ovarian neoplasm. Materials and Methods: All together one hundred three cases were evaluated using both touch/imprint and histopathology diagnosis. The histopathology diagnoses consisted of Benign (n=85), borderline (n=4), and malignant (n=12). Touch imprint cytology consists of Negative for malignancy (n=90), Positive for malignancy (n=11) and inadequate (n=2). Inadequate smear was excluded from the study. Results: Both touch / imprint cytology were able to diagnose benign and malignant ovarian neoplasm. Out of 103 cases, in cytology showed 89.1% patients were negative and 10.9% patients were positive. Histopathology shows 84.2% of benign ovarian neoplasm, 3.9% borderline neoplasm and 11.9% of malignant. Diagnostic accuracy of touch/ imprint was 99% with sensitivity 100% and specificity was 91.67%. Positive predictive value was 98.89% and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusion: Touch/ imprint cytology examination is simple, rapid and useful test in evaluation of ovarian neoplasms. It plays very important role in preliminary intraoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Evaluating intraoperative cytology with histopathology diagnosis and its importance in ovarian tumors |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551 https://doaj.org/article/723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50 https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JPN/article/view/27551 https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0797 https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0908 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Bigya Shrestha Runa Jha Binit Shrestha Aasiya Rajbhandari Rizuta Joshi Kirtipal Subedi |
| author2Str |
Bigya Shrestha Runa Jha Binit Shrestha Aasiya Rajbhandari Rizuta Joshi Kirtipal Subedi |
| ppnlink |
1760637777 |
| callnumber-subject |
RB - Pathology |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551 |
| callnumber-a |
RB1-214 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T18:25:28.946Z |
| _version_ |
1803583361067778048 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ043596088</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503102326.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ043596088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RB1-214</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Karishma Malla Vaidya</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluating intraoperative cytology with histopathology diagnosis and its importance in ovarian tumors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: Touch/ imprint cytology has been utilized for intraoperative evaluations of tumors to complement frozen sections in order to reach diagnosis prior to histopathology diagnosis. The main aim of this study is to find role of touch imprint in determining histopathology diagnosis of ovarian neoplasm. Materials and Methods: All together one hundred three cases were evaluated using both touch/imprint and histopathology diagnosis. The histopathology diagnoses consisted of Benign (n=85), borderline (n=4), and malignant (n=12). Touch imprint cytology consists of Negative for malignancy (n=90), Positive for malignancy (n=11) and inadequate (n=2). Inadequate smear was excluded from the study. Results: Both touch / imprint cytology were able to diagnose benign and malignant ovarian neoplasm. Out of 103 cases, in cytology showed 89.1% patients were negative and 10.9% patients were positive. Histopathology shows 84.2% of benign ovarian neoplasm, 3.9% borderline neoplasm and 11.9% of malignant. Diagnostic accuracy of touch/ imprint was 99% with sensitivity 100% and specificity was 91.67%. Positive predictive value was 98.89% and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusion: Touch/ imprint cytology examination is simple, rapid and useful test in evaluation of ovarian neoplasms. It plays very important role in preliminary intraoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">histology diagnosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">interaoperative diagnosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ovarian neoplasm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">touch imprint</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pathology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bigya Shrestha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Runa Jha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Binit Shrestha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aasiya Rajbhandari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rizuta Joshi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kirtipal Subedi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Pathology of Nepal</subfield><subfield code="d">Association of Clinical Pathologists of Nepal, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2020), 1, Seite 1630-1634</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760637777</subfield><subfield code="x">20910908</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1630-1634</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3126/jpn.v10i1.27551</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/723b177bded740c3acb76f95a52bbc50</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JPN/article/view/27551</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0797</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0908</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">1630-1634</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4022093 |