Pollination Compatibility and Xenia in Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera, a major woody oil plant, has a low oil yield because of self-incompatibility. For commercial oil production, compatible pollen and optimal cross-pollination combinations are required. To evaluate the effects of pollination compatibility and pollen source on oil yield and quality,...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Guanxing Hu [verfasserIn] Chao Gao [verfasserIn] Xiaoming Fan [verfasserIn] Wenfang Gong [verfasserIn] Deyi Yuan [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: HortScience - American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS), 2020, 55(2020), 6, Seite 898-905 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:55 ; year:2020 ; number:6 ; pages:898-905 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ044261063 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ044261063 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230308080738.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ044261063 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a SB1-1110 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Guanxing Hu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Pollination Compatibility and Xenia in Camellia oleifera |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Camellia oleifera, a major woody oil plant, has a low oil yield because of self-incompatibility. For commercial oil production, compatible pollen and optimal cross-pollination combinations are required. To evaluate the effects of pollination compatibility and pollen source on oil yield and quality, four C. oleifera cultivars—Huashuo (HS), Huajin (HJ), Huaxin (HX), and Xianglin XLC15 (XL)—were subjected to self-, cross-, and natural pollination. Pollen compatibility, oil yield, and quality indices were analyzed. There were no significant differences in pollen germination and tube growth between self- and cross-pollination. Following self-pollination, fertilization was unsuccessful, resulting in severe ovule dysplasia; cross-pollination decreased the ovule abortion rate. Pollen source significantly affected the fruit set, fruit traits, seed traits, and fatty acid content, implying xenia in C. oleifera. In cross-pollinated plants, HX pollen produced more seeds, and HJ pollen increased linoleic acid content relative to naturally pollinated plants. For the XL and HS combinations, linolenic acid contents were significantly higher than other pollination combinations. However, oleic acid content was not significantly affected by pollen source, in any of the cultivars. Cultivar HX was, therefore, the most effective pollen donor, and HS × HX was the optimal cross-pollination combination for improving oil yield and sustainability. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a cross-polination | |
| 650 | 4 | |a pollen | |
| 650 | 4 | |a self-pollination | |
| 650 | 4 | |a tea oil | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Plant culture | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Chao Gao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Xiaoming Fan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Wenfang Gong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Deyi Yuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t HortScience |d American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS), 2020 |g 55(2020), 6, Seite 898-905 |w (DE-627)1760614955 |x 23279834 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:55 |g year:2020 |g number:6 |g pages:898-905 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14933-20 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/55/6/article-p898.xml |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2327-9834 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 55 |j 2020 |e 6 |h 898-905 | ||
| author_variant |
g h gh c g cg x f xf w g wg d y dy |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:23279834:2020----::olntocmaiiiynxnana |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
SB |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ044261063 (DE-599)DOAJ8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 Guanxing Hu verfasserin aut Pollination Compatibility and Xenia in Camellia oleifera 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Camellia oleifera, a major woody oil plant, has a low oil yield because of self-incompatibility. For commercial oil production, compatible pollen and optimal cross-pollination combinations are required. To evaluate the effects of pollination compatibility and pollen source on oil yield and quality, four C. oleifera cultivars—Huashuo (HS), Huajin (HJ), Huaxin (HX), and Xianglin XLC15 (XL)—were subjected to self-, cross-, and natural pollination. Pollen compatibility, oil yield, and quality indices were analyzed. There were no significant differences in pollen germination and tube growth between self- and cross-pollination. Following self-pollination, fertilization was unsuccessful, resulting in severe ovule dysplasia; cross-pollination decreased the ovule abortion rate. Pollen source significantly affected the fruit set, fruit traits, seed traits, and fatty acid content, implying xenia in C. oleifera. In cross-pollinated plants, HX pollen produced more seeds, and HJ pollen increased linoleic acid content relative to naturally pollinated plants. For the XL and HS combinations, linolenic acid contents were significantly higher than other pollination combinations. However, oleic acid content was not significantly affected by pollen source, in any of the cultivars. Cultivar HX was, therefore, the most effective pollen donor, and HS × HX was the optimal cross-pollination combination for improving oil yield and sustainability. cross-polination pollen self-pollination tea oil Plant culture Chao Gao verfasserin aut Xiaoming Fan verfasserin aut Wenfang Gong verfasserin aut Deyi Yuan verfasserin aut In HortScience American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS), 2020 55(2020), 6, Seite 898-905 (DE-627)1760614955 23279834 nnns volume:55 year:2020 number:6 pages:898-905 https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14933-20 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4 kostenfrei https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/55/6/article-p898.xml kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2327-9834 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 55 2020 6 898-905 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ044261063 (DE-599)DOAJ8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 Guanxing Hu verfasserin aut Pollination Compatibility and Xenia in Camellia oleifera 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Camellia oleifera, a major woody oil plant, has a low oil yield because of self-incompatibility. For commercial oil production, compatible pollen and optimal cross-pollination combinations are required. To evaluate the effects of pollination compatibility and pollen source on oil yield and quality, four C. oleifera cultivars—Huashuo (HS), Huajin (HJ), Huaxin (HX), and Xianglin XLC15 (XL)—were subjected to self-, cross-, and natural pollination. Pollen compatibility, oil yield, and quality indices were analyzed. There were no significant differences in pollen germination and tube growth between self- and cross-pollination. Following self-pollination, fertilization was unsuccessful, resulting in severe ovule dysplasia; cross-pollination decreased the ovule abortion rate. Pollen source significantly affected the fruit set, fruit traits, seed traits, and fatty acid content, implying xenia in C. oleifera. In cross-pollinated plants, HX pollen produced more seeds, and HJ pollen increased linoleic acid content relative to naturally pollinated plants. For the XL and HS combinations, linolenic acid contents were significantly higher than other pollination combinations. However, oleic acid content was not significantly affected by pollen source, in any of the cultivars. Cultivar HX was, therefore, the most effective pollen donor, and HS × HX was the optimal cross-pollination combination for improving oil yield and sustainability. cross-polination pollen self-pollination tea oil Plant culture Chao Gao verfasserin aut Xiaoming Fan verfasserin aut Wenfang Gong verfasserin aut Deyi Yuan verfasserin aut In HortScience American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS), 2020 55(2020), 6, Seite 898-905 (DE-627)1760614955 23279834 nnns volume:55 year:2020 number:6 pages:898-905 https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14933-20 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4 kostenfrei https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/55/6/article-p898.xml kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2327-9834 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 55 2020 6 898-905 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ044261063 (DE-599)DOAJ8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 Guanxing Hu verfasserin aut Pollination Compatibility and Xenia in Camellia oleifera 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Camellia oleifera, a major woody oil plant, has a low oil yield because of self-incompatibility. For commercial oil production, compatible pollen and optimal cross-pollination combinations are required. To evaluate the effects of pollination compatibility and pollen source on oil yield and quality, four C. oleifera cultivars—Huashuo (HS), Huajin (HJ), Huaxin (HX), and Xianglin XLC15 (XL)—were subjected to self-, cross-, and natural pollination. Pollen compatibility, oil yield, and quality indices were analyzed. There were no significant differences in pollen germination and tube growth between self- and cross-pollination. Following self-pollination, fertilization was unsuccessful, resulting in severe ovule dysplasia; cross-pollination decreased the ovule abortion rate. Pollen source significantly affected the fruit set, fruit traits, seed traits, and fatty acid content, implying xenia in C. oleifera. In cross-pollinated plants, HX pollen produced more seeds, and HJ pollen increased linoleic acid content relative to naturally pollinated plants. For the XL and HS combinations, linolenic acid contents were significantly higher than other pollination combinations. However, oleic acid content was not significantly affected by pollen source, in any of the cultivars. Cultivar HX was, therefore, the most effective pollen donor, and HS × HX was the optimal cross-pollination combination for improving oil yield and sustainability. cross-polination pollen self-pollination tea oil Plant culture Chao Gao verfasserin aut Xiaoming Fan verfasserin aut Wenfang Gong verfasserin aut Deyi Yuan verfasserin aut In HortScience American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS), 2020 55(2020), 6, Seite 898-905 (DE-627)1760614955 23279834 nnns volume:55 year:2020 number:6 pages:898-905 https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14933-20 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4 kostenfrei https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/55/6/article-p898.xml kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2327-9834 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 55 2020 6 898-905 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ044261063 (DE-599)DOAJ8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 Guanxing Hu verfasserin aut Pollination Compatibility and Xenia in Camellia oleifera 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Camellia oleifera, a major woody oil plant, has a low oil yield because of self-incompatibility. For commercial oil production, compatible pollen and optimal cross-pollination combinations are required. To evaluate the effects of pollination compatibility and pollen source on oil yield and quality, four C. oleifera cultivars—Huashuo (HS), Huajin (HJ), Huaxin (HX), and Xianglin XLC15 (XL)—were subjected to self-, cross-, and natural pollination. Pollen compatibility, oil yield, and quality indices were analyzed. There were no significant differences in pollen germination and tube growth between self- and cross-pollination. Following self-pollination, fertilization was unsuccessful, resulting in severe ovule dysplasia; cross-pollination decreased the ovule abortion rate. Pollen source significantly affected the fruit set, fruit traits, seed traits, and fatty acid content, implying xenia in C. oleifera. In cross-pollinated plants, HX pollen produced more seeds, and HJ pollen increased linoleic acid content relative to naturally pollinated plants. For the XL and HS combinations, linolenic acid contents were significantly higher than other pollination combinations. However, oleic acid content was not significantly affected by pollen source, in any of the cultivars. Cultivar HX was, therefore, the most effective pollen donor, and HS × HX was the optimal cross-pollination combination for improving oil yield and sustainability. cross-polination pollen self-pollination tea oil Plant culture Chao Gao verfasserin aut Xiaoming Fan verfasserin aut Wenfang Gong verfasserin aut Deyi Yuan verfasserin aut In HortScience American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS), 2020 55(2020), 6, Seite 898-905 (DE-627)1760614955 23279834 nnns volume:55 year:2020 number:6 pages:898-905 https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14933-20 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4 kostenfrei https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/55/6/article-p898.xml kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2327-9834 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 55 2020 6 898-905 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ044261063 (DE-599)DOAJ8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 Guanxing Hu verfasserin aut Pollination Compatibility and Xenia in Camellia oleifera 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Camellia oleifera, a major woody oil plant, has a low oil yield because of self-incompatibility. For commercial oil production, compatible pollen and optimal cross-pollination combinations are required. To evaluate the effects of pollination compatibility and pollen source on oil yield and quality, four C. oleifera cultivars—Huashuo (HS), Huajin (HJ), Huaxin (HX), and Xianglin XLC15 (XL)—were subjected to self-, cross-, and natural pollination. Pollen compatibility, oil yield, and quality indices were analyzed. There were no significant differences in pollen germination and tube growth between self- and cross-pollination. Following self-pollination, fertilization was unsuccessful, resulting in severe ovule dysplasia; cross-pollination decreased the ovule abortion rate. Pollen source significantly affected the fruit set, fruit traits, seed traits, and fatty acid content, implying xenia in C. oleifera. In cross-pollinated plants, HX pollen produced more seeds, and HJ pollen increased linoleic acid content relative to naturally pollinated plants. For the XL and HS combinations, linolenic acid contents were significantly higher than other pollination combinations. However, oleic acid content was not significantly affected by pollen source, in any of the cultivars. Cultivar HX was, therefore, the most effective pollen donor, and HS × HX was the optimal cross-pollination combination for improving oil yield and sustainability. cross-polination pollen self-pollination tea oil Plant culture Chao Gao verfasserin aut Xiaoming Fan verfasserin aut Wenfang Gong verfasserin aut Deyi Yuan verfasserin aut In HortScience American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS), 2020 55(2020), 6, Seite 898-905 (DE-627)1760614955 23279834 nnns volume:55 year:2020 number:6 pages:898-905 https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14933-20 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4 kostenfrei https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/55/6/article-p898.xml kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2327-9834 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 55 2020 6 898-905 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In HortScience 55(2020), 6, Seite 898-905 volume:55 year:2020 number:6 pages:898-905 |
| sourceStr |
In HortScience 55(2020), 6, Seite 898-905 volume:55 year:2020 number:6 pages:898-905 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
cross-polination pollen self-pollination tea oil Plant culture |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
HortScience |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Guanxing Hu @@aut@@ Chao Gao @@aut@@ Xiaoming Fan @@aut@@ Wenfang Gong @@aut@@ Deyi Yuan @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760614955 |
| id |
DOAJ044261063 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ044261063</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308080738.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ044261063</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SB1-1110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guanxing Hu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pollination Compatibility and Xenia in Camellia oleifera</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Camellia oleifera, a major woody oil plant, has a low oil yield because of self-incompatibility. For commercial oil production, compatible pollen and optimal cross-pollination combinations are required. To evaluate the effects of pollination compatibility and pollen source on oil yield and quality, four C. oleifera cultivars—Huashuo (HS), Huajin (HJ), Huaxin (HX), and Xianglin XLC15 (XL)—were subjected to self-, cross-, and natural pollination. Pollen compatibility, oil yield, and quality indices were analyzed. There were no significant differences in pollen germination and tube growth between self- and cross-pollination. Following self-pollination, fertilization was unsuccessful, resulting in severe ovule dysplasia; cross-pollination decreased the ovule abortion rate. Pollen source significantly affected the fruit set, fruit traits, seed traits, and fatty acid content, implying xenia in C. oleifera. In cross-pollinated plants, HX pollen produced more seeds, and HJ pollen increased linoleic acid content relative to naturally pollinated plants. For the XL and HS combinations, linolenic acid contents were significantly higher than other pollination combinations. However, oleic acid content was not significantly affected by pollen source, in any of the cultivars. Cultivar HX was, therefore, the most effective pollen donor, and HS × HX was the optimal cross-pollination combination for improving oil yield and sustainability.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cross-polination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pollen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">self-pollination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">tea oil</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Plant culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chao Gao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiaoming Fan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wenfang Gong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Deyi Yuan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">HortScience</subfield><subfield code="d">American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS), 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">55(2020), 6, Seite 898-905</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760614955</subfield><subfield code="x">23279834</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:55</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:898-905</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14933-20</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/55/6/article-p898.xml</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2327-9834</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">55</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">898-905</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
S - Agriculture |
| author |
Guanxing Hu |
| spellingShingle |
Guanxing Hu misc SB1-1110 misc cross-polination misc pollen misc self-pollination misc tea oil misc Plant culture Pollination Compatibility and Xenia in Camellia oleifera |
| authorStr |
Guanxing Hu |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760614955 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
SB1-1110 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
23279834 |
| topic_title |
SB1-1110 Pollination Compatibility and Xenia in Camellia oleifera cross-polination pollen self-pollination tea oil |
| topic |
misc SB1-1110 misc cross-polination misc pollen misc self-pollination misc tea oil misc Plant culture |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc SB1-1110 misc cross-polination misc pollen misc self-pollination misc tea oil misc Plant culture |
| topic_browse |
misc SB1-1110 misc cross-polination misc pollen misc self-pollination misc tea oil misc Plant culture |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
HortScience |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760614955 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
HortScience |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760614955 |
| title |
Pollination Compatibility and Xenia in Camellia oleifera |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ044261063 (DE-599)DOAJ8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4 |
| title_full |
Pollination Compatibility and Xenia in Camellia oleifera |
| author_sort |
Guanxing Hu |
| journal |
HortScience |
| journalStr |
HortScience |
| callnumber-first-code |
S |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
898 |
| author_browse |
Guanxing Hu Chao Gao Xiaoming Fan Wenfang Gong Deyi Yuan |
| container_volume |
55 |
| class |
SB1-1110 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Guanxing Hu |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
pollination compatibility and xenia in camellia oleifera |
| callnumber |
SB1-1110 |
| title_auth |
Pollination Compatibility and Xenia in Camellia oleifera |
| abstract |
Camellia oleifera, a major woody oil plant, has a low oil yield because of self-incompatibility. For commercial oil production, compatible pollen and optimal cross-pollination combinations are required. To evaluate the effects of pollination compatibility and pollen source on oil yield and quality, four C. oleifera cultivars—Huashuo (HS), Huajin (HJ), Huaxin (HX), and Xianglin XLC15 (XL)—were subjected to self-, cross-, and natural pollination. Pollen compatibility, oil yield, and quality indices were analyzed. There were no significant differences in pollen germination and tube growth between self- and cross-pollination. Following self-pollination, fertilization was unsuccessful, resulting in severe ovule dysplasia; cross-pollination decreased the ovule abortion rate. Pollen source significantly affected the fruit set, fruit traits, seed traits, and fatty acid content, implying xenia in C. oleifera. In cross-pollinated plants, HX pollen produced more seeds, and HJ pollen increased linoleic acid content relative to naturally pollinated plants. For the XL and HS combinations, linolenic acid contents were significantly higher than other pollination combinations. However, oleic acid content was not significantly affected by pollen source, in any of the cultivars. Cultivar HX was, therefore, the most effective pollen donor, and HS × HX was the optimal cross-pollination combination for improving oil yield and sustainability. |
| abstractGer |
Camellia oleifera, a major woody oil plant, has a low oil yield because of self-incompatibility. For commercial oil production, compatible pollen and optimal cross-pollination combinations are required. To evaluate the effects of pollination compatibility and pollen source on oil yield and quality, four C. oleifera cultivars—Huashuo (HS), Huajin (HJ), Huaxin (HX), and Xianglin XLC15 (XL)—were subjected to self-, cross-, and natural pollination. Pollen compatibility, oil yield, and quality indices were analyzed. There were no significant differences in pollen germination and tube growth between self- and cross-pollination. Following self-pollination, fertilization was unsuccessful, resulting in severe ovule dysplasia; cross-pollination decreased the ovule abortion rate. Pollen source significantly affected the fruit set, fruit traits, seed traits, and fatty acid content, implying xenia in C. oleifera. In cross-pollinated plants, HX pollen produced more seeds, and HJ pollen increased linoleic acid content relative to naturally pollinated plants. For the XL and HS combinations, linolenic acid contents were significantly higher than other pollination combinations. However, oleic acid content was not significantly affected by pollen source, in any of the cultivars. Cultivar HX was, therefore, the most effective pollen donor, and HS × HX was the optimal cross-pollination combination for improving oil yield and sustainability. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Camellia oleifera, a major woody oil plant, has a low oil yield because of self-incompatibility. For commercial oil production, compatible pollen and optimal cross-pollination combinations are required. To evaluate the effects of pollination compatibility and pollen source on oil yield and quality, four C. oleifera cultivars—Huashuo (HS), Huajin (HJ), Huaxin (HX), and Xianglin XLC15 (XL)—were subjected to self-, cross-, and natural pollination. Pollen compatibility, oil yield, and quality indices were analyzed. There were no significant differences in pollen germination and tube growth between self- and cross-pollination. Following self-pollination, fertilization was unsuccessful, resulting in severe ovule dysplasia; cross-pollination decreased the ovule abortion rate. Pollen source significantly affected the fruit set, fruit traits, seed traits, and fatty acid content, implying xenia in C. oleifera. In cross-pollinated plants, HX pollen produced more seeds, and HJ pollen increased linoleic acid content relative to naturally pollinated plants. For the XL and HS combinations, linolenic acid contents were significantly higher than other pollination combinations. However, oleic acid content was not significantly affected by pollen source, in any of the cultivars. Cultivar HX was, therefore, the most effective pollen donor, and HS × HX was the optimal cross-pollination combination for improving oil yield and sustainability. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
6 |
| title_short |
Pollination Compatibility and Xenia in Camellia oleifera |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14933-20 https://doaj.org/article/8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4 https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/55/6/article-p898.xml https://doaj.org/toc/2327-9834 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Chao Gao Xiaoming Fan Wenfang Gong Deyi Yuan |
| author2Str |
Chao Gao Xiaoming Fan Wenfang Gong Deyi Yuan |
| ppnlink |
1760614955 |
| callnumber-subject |
SB - Plant Culture |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| callnumber-a |
SB1-1110 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T22:06:12.594Z |
| _version_ |
1803597248037126144 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ044261063</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308080738.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ044261063</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SB1-1110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guanxing Hu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pollination Compatibility and Xenia in Camellia oleifera</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Camellia oleifera, a major woody oil plant, has a low oil yield because of self-incompatibility. For commercial oil production, compatible pollen and optimal cross-pollination combinations are required. To evaluate the effects of pollination compatibility and pollen source on oil yield and quality, four C. oleifera cultivars—Huashuo (HS), Huajin (HJ), Huaxin (HX), and Xianglin XLC15 (XL)—were subjected to self-, cross-, and natural pollination. Pollen compatibility, oil yield, and quality indices were analyzed. There were no significant differences in pollen germination and tube growth between self- and cross-pollination. Following self-pollination, fertilization was unsuccessful, resulting in severe ovule dysplasia; cross-pollination decreased the ovule abortion rate. Pollen source significantly affected the fruit set, fruit traits, seed traits, and fatty acid content, implying xenia in C. oleifera. In cross-pollinated plants, HX pollen produced more seeds, and HJ pollen increased linoleic acid content relative to naturally pollinated plants. For the XL and HS combinations, linolenic acid contents were significantly higher than other pollination combinations. However, oleic acid content was not significantly affected by pollen source, in any of the cultivars. Cultivar HX was, therefore, the most effective pollen donor, and HS × HX was the optimal cross-pollination combination for improving oil yield and sustainability.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cross-polination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pollen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">self-pollination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">tea oil</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Plant culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chao Gao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiaoming Fan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wenfang Gong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Deyi Yuan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">HortScience</subfield><subfield code="d">American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS), 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">55(2020), 6, Seite 898-905</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760614955</subfield><subfield code="x">23279834</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:55</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:898-905</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14933-20</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8121d0db678f4744ae73fec530e662a4</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/55/6/article-p898.xml</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2327-9834</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">55</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">898-905</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4009047 |