URDU-CRITICISM OF AIYMA NAQAAD (THE CRITICS) ON THE RAVI IN THE TERM OF PERSONAL STATUS RESEARCH AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENCES OF MUHADDITHIN
There is no work of the world in which man is involved and there is no disagreement. So disagreement is a natural process between human beings. People have different views and opinions in their ways of life according to their knowledge and wisdom. Religion and culture also affect people’s thinking....
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Muhammad Rizwan [verfasserIn] Shahzada Imran Ayub [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Arabisch ; Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
Disagreement, Religion, Ravi, Hadith, Mohaddethin, Zaief, Jarh, T`adeel. |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: دی اسکالر - Research Gateway Society, 2022, 5(2019), 2 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:5 ; year:2019 ; number:2 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ045213887 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ045213887 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230502062253.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||ara c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ045213887 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a ara |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a BP1-253 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a KBP1-4860 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Muhammad Rizwan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a URDU-CRITICISM OF AIYMA NAQAAD (THE CRITICS) ON THE RAVI IN THE TERM OF PERSONAL STATUS RESEARCH AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENCES OF MUHADDITHIN |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a There is no work of the world in which man is involved and there is no disagreement. So disagreement is a natural process between human beings. People have different views and opinions in their ways of life according to their knowledge and wisdom. Religion and culture also affect people’s thinking. As ordinary human beings, there has been a difference of opinion between Mohaddethin in regard of the health and weaknesses of Rawayan-e-Hadeeth. But it is extremely important to understand the disagreement of critics (Aima-Niqad) and evaluate their causes compared to differences in all walks of life. Because it is related to Hadith-e- Rasool which is the interpretation of Quran and the second primary source of Islam. So that the doubts and suspicions created in the mind of people can be removed. Basically, the disagreement in trustworthiness and duplication of Ruwath is either according to the personal status of critics or principles of Jarah-o-Tadeel and in the term of their application. According to the personal status of critics there are many causes of disagreements of Mohaddethin. Aima-Niqad are different about the vastness of knowledge from each other. Due to this difference of knowledge, some Mohaddethin are familiar with the living condition of all narrators but some Mohaddethin are not aware of the general conditions or specific weakness of some narrators. Due to this difference in knowledge, Mohaddethin disagree in ordering the narrators. Some times this difference of knowledge is in the Hadith. Some of the critics are familiar with all the Hadith of the narrator. But some Aima-Niqad are ignorant of the all Hadith of narrator or Hadith of any particular shiekh or the city which are not trustworthy. Due to this reason there is a disagreement in ordering the narrators. Due to different temperaments, some become violent, aggressive and some become moderate in ordering the Hadith. So, different natures of Mohaddethin are also effective on the narrators. Some, critics due to the achievement of worldly goals, impose unjust ruling, due to their difference in the opinion of Mohaddethin about the narrators. Mistakes are the weakness of human beings, some Mohaddethin also made a mistake in the matter of ruling on Rawayat, due to reasons of human weakness there is a disagreement with the other Mohaddethin. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Disagreement, Religion, Ravi, Hadith, Mohaddethin, Zaief, Jarh, T`adeel. | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Islam | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Islamic law | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Shahzada Imran Ayub |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t دی اسکالر |d Research Gateway Society, 2022 |g 5(2019), 2 |w (DE-627)DOAJ07859300X |x 26174308 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2019 |g number:2 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://siarj.com/index.php/Siarj/article/view/347 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2413-7480 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2617-4308 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 5 |j 2019 |e 2 | ||
| author_variant |
m r mr s i a sia |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:26174308:2019----::rurtcsoayaaadhciisnhrviteemfesnlttseerhnaayia |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
BP |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ045213887 (DE-599)DOAJ33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ara eng BP1-253 KBP1-4860 Muhammad Rizwan verfasserin aut URDU-CRITICISM OF AIYMA NAQAAD (THE CRITICS) ON THE RAVI IN THE TERM OF PERSONAL STATUS RESEARCH AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENCES OF MUHADDITHIN 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There is no work of the world in which man is involved and there is no disagreement. So disagreement is a natural process between human beings. People have different views and opinions in their ways of life according to their knowledge and wisdom. Religion and culture also affect people’s thinking. As ordinary human beings, there has been a difference of opinion between Mohaddethin in regard of the health and weaknesses of Rawayan-e-Hadeeth. But it is extremely important to understand the disagreement of critics (Aima-Niqad) and evaluate their causes compared to differences in all walks of life. Because it is related to Hadith-e- Rasool which is the interpretation of Quran and the second primary source of Islam. So that the doubts and suspicions created in the mind of people can be removed. Basically, the disagreement in trustworthiness and duplication of Ruwath is either according to the personal status of critics or principles of Jarah-o-Tadeel and in the term of their application. According to the personal status of critics there are many causes of disagreements of Mohaddethin. Aima-Niqad are different about the vastness of knowledge from each other. Due to this difference of knowledge, some Mohaddethin are familiar with the living condition of all narrators but some Mohaddethin are not aware of the general conditions or specific weakness of some narrators. Due to this difference in knowledge, Mohaddethin disagree in ordering the narrators. Some times this difference of knowledge is in the Hadith. Some of the critics are familiar with all the Hadith of the narrator. But some Aima-Niqad are ignorant of the all Hadith of narrator or Hadith of any particular shiekh or the city which are not trustworthy. Due to this reason there is a disagreement in ordering the narrators. Due to different temperaments, some become violent, aggressive and some become moderate in ordering the Hadith. So, different natures of Mohaddethin are also effective on the narrators. Some, critics due to the achievement of worldly goals, impose unjust ruling, due to their difference in the opinion of Mohaddethin about the narrators. Mistakes are the weakness of human beings, some Mohaddethin also made a mistake in the matter of ruling on Rawayat, due to reasons of human weakness there is a disagreement with the other Mohaddethin. Disagreement, Religion, Ravi, Hadith, Mohaddethin, Zaief, Jarh, T`adeel. Islam Islamic law Shahzada Imran Ayub verfasserin aut In دی اسکالر Research Gateway Society, 2022 5(2019), 2 (DE-627)DOAJ07859300X 26174308 nnns volume:5 year:2019 number:2 https://doaj.org/article/33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8 kostenfrei http://siarj.com/index.php/Siarj/article/view/347 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2413-7480 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2617-4308 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 5 2019 2 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ045213887 (DE-599)DOAJ33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ara eng BP1-253 KBP1-4860 Muhammad Rizwan verfasserin aut URDU-CRITICISM OF AIYMA NAQAAD (THE CRITICS) ON THE RAVI IN THE TERM OF PERSONAL STATUS RESEARCH AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENCES OF MUHADDITHIN 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There is no work of the world in which man is involved and there is no disagreement. So disagreement is a natural process between human beings. People have different views and opinions in their ways of life according to their knowledge and wisdom. Religion and culture also affect people’s thinking. As ordinary human beings, there has been a difference of opinion between Mohaddethin in regard of the health and weaknesses of Rawayan-e-Hadeeth. But it is extremely important to understand the disagreement of critics (Aima-Niqad) and evaluate their causes compared to differences in all walks of life. Because it is related to Hadith-e- Rasool which is the interpretation of Quran and the second primary source of Islam. So that the doubts and suspicions created in the mind of people can be removed. Basically, the disagreement in trustworthiness and duplication of Ruwath is either according to the personal status of critics or principles of Jarah-o-Tadeel and in the term of their application. According to the personal status of critics there are many causes of disagreements of Mohaddethin. Aima-Niqad are different about the vastness of knowledge from each other. Due to this difference of knowledge, some Mohaddethin are familiar with the living condition of all narrators but some Mohaddethin are not aware of the general conditions or specific weakness of some narrators. Due to this difference in knowledge, Mohaddethin disagree in ordering the narrators. Some times this difference of knowledge is in the Hadith. Some of the critics are familiar with all the Hadith of the narrator. But some Aima-Niqad are ignorant of the all Hadith of narrator or Hadith of any particular shiekh or the city which are not trustworthy. Due to this reason there is a disagreement in ordering the narrators. Due to different temperaments, some become violent, aggressive and some become moderate in ordering the Hadith. So, different natures of Mohaddethin are also effective on the narrators. Some, critics due to the achievement of worldly goals, impose unjust ruling, due to their difference in the opinion of Mohaddethin about the narrators. Mistakes are the weakness of human beings, some Mohaddethin also made a mistake in the matter of ruling on Rawayat, due to reasons of human weakness there is a disagreement with the other Mohaddethin. Disagreement, Religion, Ravi, Hadith, Mohaddethin, Zaief, Jarh, T`adeel. Islam Islamic law Shahzada Imran Ayub verfasserin aut In دی اسکالر Research Gateway Society, 2022 5(2019), 2 (DE-627)DOAJ07859300X 26174308 nnns volume:5 year:2019 number:2 https://doaj.org/article/33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8 kostenfrei http://siarj.com/index.php/Siarj/article/view/347 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2413-7480 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2617-4308 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 5 2019 2 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ045213887 (DE-599)DOAJ33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ara eng BP1-253 KBP1-4860 Muhammad Rizwan verfasserin aut URDU-CRITICISM OF AIYMA NAQAAD (THE CRITICS) ON THE RAVI IN THE TERM OF PERSONAL STATUS RESEARCH AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENCES OF MUHADDITHIN 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There is no work of the world in which man is involved and there is no disagreement. So disagreement is a natural process between human beings. People have different views and opinions in their ways of life according to their knowledge and wisdom. Religion and culture also affect people’s thinking. As ordinary human beings, there has been a difference of opinion between Mohaddethin in regard of the health and weaknesses of Rawayan-e-Hadeeth. But it is extremely important to understand the disagreement of critics (Aima-Niqad) and evaluate their causes compared to differences in all walks of life. Because it is related to Hadith-e- Rasool which is the interpretation of Quran and the second primary source of Islam. So that the doubts and suspicions created in the mind of people can be removed. Basically, the disagreement in trustworthiness and duplication of Ruwath is either according to the personal status of critics or principles of Jarah-o-Tadeel and in the term of their application. According to the personal status of critics there are many causes of disagreements of Mohaddethin. Aima-Niqad are different about the vastness of knowledge from each other. Due to this difference of knowledge, some Mohaddethin are familiar with the living condition of all narrators but some Mohaddethin are not aware of the general conditions or specific weakness of some narrators. Due to this difference in knowledge, Mohaddethin disagree in ordering the narrators. Some times this difference of knowledge is in the Hadith. Some of the critics are familiar with all the Hadith of the narrator. But some Aima-Niqad are ignorant of the all Hadith of narrator or Hadith of any particular shiekh or the city which are not trustworthy. Due to this reason there is a disagreement in ordering the narrators. Due to different temperaments, some become violent, aggressive and some become moderate in ordering the Hadith. So, different natures of Mohaddethin are also effective on the narrators. Some, critics due to the achievement of worldly goals, impose unjust ruling, due to their difference in the opinion of Mohaddethin about the narrators. Mistakes are the weakness of human beings, some Mohaddethin also made a mistake in the matter of ruling on Rawayat, due to reasons of human weakness there is a disagreement with the other Mohaddethin. Disagreement, Religion, Ravi, Hadith, Mohaddethin, Zaief, Jarh, T`adeel. Islam Islamic law Shahzada Imran Ayub verfasserin aut In دی اسکالر Research Gateway Society, 2022 5(2019), 2 (DE-627)DOAJ07859300X 26174308 nnns volume:5 year:2019 number:2 https://doaj.org/article/33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8 kostenfrei http://siarj.com/index.php/Siarj/article/view/347 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2413-7480 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2617-4308 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 5 2019 2 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ045213887 (DE-599)DOAJ33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ara eng BP1-253 KBP1-4860 Muhammad Rizwan verfasserin aut URDU-CRITICISM OF AIYMA NAQAAD (THE CRITICS) ON THE RAVI IN THE TERM OF PERSONAL STATUS RESEARCH AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENCES OF MUHADDITHIN 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There is no work of the world in which man is involved and there is no disagreement. So disagreement is a natural process between human beings. People have different views and opinions in their ways of life according to their knowledge and wisdom. Religion and culture also affect people’s thinking. As ordinary human beings, there has been a difference of opinion between Mohaddethin in regard of the health and weaknesses of Rawayan-e-Hadeeth. But it is extremely important to understand the disagreement of critics (Aima-Niqad) and evaluate their causes compared to differences in all walks of life. Because it is related to Hadith-e- Rasool which is the interpretation of Quran and the second primary source of Islam. So that the doubts and suspicions created in the mind of people can be removed. Basically, the disagreement in trustworthiness and duplication of Ruwath is either according to the personal status of critics or principles of Jarah-o-Tadeel and in the term of their application. According to the personal status of critics there are many causes of disagreements of Mohaddethin. Aima-Niqad are different about the vastness of knowledge from each other. Due to this difference of knowledge, some Mohaddethin are familiar with the living condition of all narrators but some Mohaddethin are not aware of the general conditions or specific weakness of some narrators. Due to this difference in knowledge, Mohaddethin disagree in ordering the narrators. Some times this difference of knowledge is in the Hadith. Some of the critics are familiar with all the Hadith of the narrator. But some Aima-Niqad are ignorant of the all Hadith of narrator or Hadith of any particular shiekh or the city which are not trustworthy. Due to this reason there is a disagreement in ordering the narrators. Due to different temperaments, some become violent, aggressive and some become moderate in ordering the Hadith. So, different natures of Mohaddethin are also effective on the narrators. Some, critics due to the achievement of worldly goals, impose unjust ruling, due to their difference in the opinion of Mohaddethin about the narrators. Mistakes are the weakness of human beings, some Mohaddethin also made a mistake in the matter of ruling on Rawayat, due to reasons of human weakness there is a disagreement with the other Mohaddethin. Disagreement, Religion, Ravi, Hadith, Mohaddethin, Zaief, Jarh, T`adeel. Islam Islamic law Shahzada Imran Ayub verfasserin aut In دی اسکالر Research Gateway Society, 2022 5(2019), 2 (DE-627)DOAJ07859300X 26174308 nnns volume:5 year:2019 number:2 https://doaj.org/article/33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8 kostenfrei http://siarj.com/index.php/Siarj/article/view/347 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2413-7480 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2617-4308 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 5 2019 2 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ045213887 (DE-599)DOAJ33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ara eng BP1-253 KBP1-4860 Muhammad Rizwan verfasserin aut URDU-CRITICISM OF AIYMA NAQAAD (THE CRITICS) ON THE RAVI IN THE TERM OF PERSONAL STATUS RESEARCH AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENCES OF MUHADDITHIN 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There is no work of the world in which man is involved and there is no disagreement. So disagreement is a natural process between human beings. People have different views and opinions in their ways of life according to their knowledge and wisdom. Religion and culture also affect people’s thinking. As ordinary human beings, there has been a difference of opinion between Mohaddethin in regard of the health and weaknesses of Rawayan-e-Hadeeth. But it is extremely important to understand the disagreement of critics (Aima-Niqad) and evaluate their causes compared to differences in all walks of life. Because it is related to Hadith-e- Rasool which is the interpretation of Quran and the second primary source of Islam. So that the doubts and suspicions created in the mind of people can be removed. Basically, the disagreement in trustworthiness and duplication of Ruwath is either according to the personal status of critics or principles of Jarah-o-Tadeel and in the term of their application. According to the personal status of critics there are many causes of disagreements of Mohaddethin. Aima-Niqad are different about the vastness of knowledge from each other. Due to this difference of knowledge, some Mohaddethin are familiar with the living condition of all narrators but some Mohaddethin are not aware of the general conditions or specific weakness of some narrators. Due to this difference in knowledge, Mohaddethin disagree in ordering the narrators. Some times this difference of knowledge is in the Hadith. Some of the critics are familiar with all the Hadith of the narrator. But some Aima-Niqad are ignorant of the all Hadith of narrator or Hadith of any particular shiekh or the city which are not trustworthy. Due to this reason there is a disagreement in ordering the narrators. Due to different temperaments, some become violent, aggressive and some become moderate in ordering the Hadith. So, different natures of Mohaddethin are also effective on the narrators. Some, critics due to the achievement of worldly goals, impose unjust ruling, due to their difference in the opinion of Mohaddethin about the narrators. Mistakes are the weakness of human beings, some Mohaddethin also made a mistake in the matter of ruling on Rawayat, due to reasons of human weakness there is a disagreement with the other Mohaddethin. Disagreement, Religion, Ravi, Hadith, Mohaddethin, Zaief, Jarh, T`adeel. Islam Islamic law Shahzada Imran Ayub verfasserin aut In دی اسکالر Research Gateway Society, 2022 5(2019), 2 (DE-627)DOAJ07859300X 26174308 nnns volume:5 year:2019 number:2 https://doaj.org/article/33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8 kostenfrei http://siarj.com/index.php/Siarj/article/view/347 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2413-7480 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2617-4308 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 5 2019 2 |
| language |
Arabic English |
| source |
In دی اسکالر 5(2019), 2 volume:5 year:2019 number:2 |
| sourceStr |
In دی اسکالر 5(2019), 2 volume:5 year:2019 number:2 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Disagreement, Religion, Ravi, Hadith, Mohaddethin, Zaief, Jarh, T`adeel. Islam Islamic law |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
دی اسکالر |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Muhammad Rizwan @@aut@@ Shahzada Imran Ayub @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
DOAJ07859300X |
| id |
DOAJ045213887 |
| language_de |
arabisch englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ045213887</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502062253.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||ara c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ045213887</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ara</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BP1-253</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KBP1-4860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muhammad Rizwan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">URDU-CRITICISM OF AIYMA NAQAAD (THE CRITICS) ON THE RAVI IN THE TERM OF PERSONAL STATUS RESEARCH AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENCES OF MUHADDITHIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There is no work of the world in which man is involved and there is no disagreement. So disagreement is a natural process between human beings. People have different views and opinions in their ways of life according to their knowledge and wisdom. Religion and culture also affect people’s thinking. As ordinary human beings, there has been a difference of opinion between Mohaddethin in regard of the health and weaknesses of Rawayan-e-Hadeeth. But it is extremely important to understand the disagreement of critics (Aima-Niqad) and evaluate their causes compared to differences in all walks of life. Because it is related to Hadith-e- Rasool which is the interpretation of Quran and the second primary source of Islam. So that the doubts and suspicions created in the mind of people can be removed. Basically, the disagreement in trustworthiness and duplication of Ruwath is either according to the personal status of critics or principles of Jarah-o-Tadeel and in the term of their application. According to the personal status of critics there are many causes of disagreements of Mohaddethin. Aima-Niqad are different about the vastness of knowledge from each other. Due to this difference of knowledge, some Mohaddethin are familiar with the living condition of all narrators but some Mohaddethin are not aware of the general conditions or specific weakness of some narrators. Due to this difference in knowledge, Mohaddethin disagree in ordering the narrators. Some times this difference of knowledge is in the Hadith. Some of the critics are familiar with all the Hadith of the narrator. But some Aima-Niqad are ignorant of the all Hadith of narrator or Hadith of any particular shiekh or the city which are not trustworthy. Due to this reason there is a disagreement in ordering the narrators. Due to different temperaments, some become violent, aggressive and some become moderate in ordering the Hadith. So, different natures of Mohaddethin are also effective on the narrators. Some, critics due to the achievement of worldly goals, impose unjust ruling, due to their difference in the opinion of Mohaddethin about the narrators. Mistakes are the weakness of human beings, some Mohaddethin also made a mistake in the matter of ruling on Rawayat, due to reasons of human weakness there is a disagreement with the other Mohaddethin. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Disagreement, Religion, Ravi, Hadith, Mohaddethin, Zaief, Jarh, T`adeel.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Islam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Islamic law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shahzada Imran Ayub</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">دی اسکالر</subfield><subfield code="d">Research Gateway Society, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2019), 2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ07859300X</subfield><subfield code="x">26174308</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://siarj.com/index.php/Siarj/article/view/347</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2413-7480</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2617-4308</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
| author |
Muhammad Rizwan |
| spellingShingle |
Muhammad Rizwan misc BP1-253 misc KBP1-4860 misc Disagreement, Religion, Ravi, Hadith, Mohaddethin, Zaief, Jarh, T`adeel. misc Islam misc Islamic law URDU-CRITICISM OF AIYMA NAQAAD (THE CRITICS) ON THE RAVI IN THE TERM OF PERSONAL STATUS RESEARCH AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENCES OF MUHADDITHIN |
| authorStr |
Muhammad Rizwan |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)DOAJ07859300X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
BP1-253 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
26174308 |
| topic_title |
BP1-253 KBP1-4860 URDU-CRITICISM OF AIYMA NAQAAD (THE CRITICS) ON THE RAVI IN THE TERM OF PERSONAL STATUS RESEARCH AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENCES OF MUHADDITHIN Disagreement, Religion, Ravi, Hadith, Mohaddethin, Zaief, Jarh, T`adeel |
| topic |
misc BP1-253 misc KBP1-4860 misc Disagreement, Religion, Ravi, Hadith, Mohaddethin, Zaief, Jarh, T`adeel. misc Islam misc Islamic law |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc BP1-253 misc KBP1-4860 misc Disagreement, Religion, Ravi, Hadith, Mohaddethin, Zaief, Jarh, T`adeel. misc Islam misc Islamic law |
| topic_browse |
misc BP1-253 misc KBP1-4860 misc Disagreement, Religion, Ravi, Hadith, Mohaddethin, Zaief, Jarh, T`adeel. misc Islam misc Islamic law |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
دی اسکالر |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
DOAJ07859300X |
| hierarchy_top_title |
دی اسکالر |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)DOAJ07859300X |
| title |
URDU-CRITICISM OF AIYMA NAQAAD (THE CRITICS) ON THE RAVI IN THE TERM OF PERSONAL STATUS RESEARCH AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENCES OF MUHADDITHIN |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ045213887 (DE-599)DOAJ33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8 |
| title_full |
URDU-CRITICISM OF AIYMA NAQAAD (THE CRITICS) ON THE RAVI IN THE TERM OF PERSONAL STATUS RESEARCH AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENCES OF MUHADDITHIN |
| author_sort |
Muhammad Rizwan |
| journal |
دی اسکالر |
| journalStr |
دی اسکالر |
| callnumber-first-code |
B |
| lang_code |
ara eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Muhammad Rizwan Shahzada Imran Ayub |
| container_volume |
5 |
| class |
BP1-253 KBP1-4860 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Muhammad Rizwan |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
urdu-criticism of aiyma naqaad (the critics) on the ravi in the term of personal status research and analytical study of differences of muhaddithin |
| callnumber |
BP1-253 |
| title_auth |
URDU-CRITICISM OF AIYMA NAQAAD (THE CRITICS) ON THE RAVI IN THE TERM OF PERSONAL STATUS RESEARCH AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENCES OF MUHADDITHIN |
| abstract |
There is no work of the world in which man is involved and there is no disagreement. So disagreement is a natural process between human beings. People have different views and opinions in their ways of life according to their knowledge and wisdom. Religion and culture also affect people’s thinking. As ordinary human beings, there has been a difference of opinion between Mohaddethin in regard of the health and weaknesses of Rawayan-e-Hadeeth. But it is extremely important to understand the disagreement of critics (Aima-Niqad) and evaluate their causes compared to differences in all walks of life. Because it is related to Hadith-e- Rasool which is the interpretation of Quran and the second primary source of Islam. So that the doubts and suspicions created in the mind of people can be removed. Basically, the disagreement in trustworthiness and duplication of Ruwath is either according to the personal status of critics or principles of Jarah-o-Tadeel and in the term of their application. According to the personal status of critics there are many causes of disagreements of Mohaddethin. Aima-Niqad are different about the vastness of knowledge from each other. Due to this difference of knowledge, some Mohaddethin are familiar with the living condition of all narrators but some Mohaddethin are not aware of the general conditions or specific weakness of some narrators. Due to this difference in knowledge, Mohaddethin disagree in ordering the narrators. Some times this difference of knowledge is in the Hadith. Some of the critics are familiar with all the Hadith of the narrator. But some Aima-Niqad are ignorant of the all Hadith of narrator or Hadith of any particular shiekh or the city which are not trustworthy. Due to this reason there is a disagreement in ordering the narrators. Due to different temperaments, some become violent, aggressive and some become moderate in ordering the Hadith. So, different natures of Mohaddethin are also effective on the narrators. Some, critics due to the achievement of worldly goals, impose unjust ruling, due to their difference in the opinion of Mohaddethin about the narrators. Mistakes are the weakness of human beings, some Mohaddethin also made a mistake in the matter of ruling on Rawayat, due to reasons of human weakness there is a disagreement with the other Mohaddethin. |
| abstractGer |
There is no work of the world in which man is involved and there is no disagreement. So disagreement is a natural process between human beings. People have different views and opinions in their ways of life according to their knowledge and wisdom. Religion and culture also affect people’s thinking. As ordinary human beings, there has been a difference of opinion between Mohaddethin in regard of the health and weaknesses of Rawayan-e-Hadeeth. But it is extremely important to understand the disagreement of critics (Aima-Niqad) and evaluate their causes compared to differences in all walks of life. Because it is related to Hadith-e- Rasool which is the interpretation of Quran and the second primary source of Islam. So that the doubts and suspicions created in the mind of people can be removed. Basically, the disagreement in trustworthiness and duplication of Ruwath is either according to the personal status of critics or principles of Jarah-o-Tadeel and in the term of their application. According to the personal status of critics there are many causes of disagreements of Mohaddethin. Aima-Niqad are different about the vastness of knowledge from each other. Due to this difference of knowledge, some Mohaddethin are familiar with the living condition of all narrators but some Mohaddethin are not aware of the general conditions or specific weakness of some narrators. Due to this difference in knowledge, Mohaddethin disagree in ordering the narrators. Some times this difference of knowledge is in the Hadith. Some of the critics are familiar with all the Hadith of the narrator. But some Aima-Niqad are ignorant of the all Hadith of narrator or Hadith of any particular shiekh or the city which are not trustworthy. Due to this reason there is a disagreement in ordering the narrators. Due to different temperaments, some become violent, aggressive and some become moderate in ordering the Hadith. So, different natures of Mohaddethin are also effective on the narrators. Some, critics due to the achievement of worldly goals, impose unjust ruling, due to their difference in the opinion of Mohaddethin about the narrators. Mistakes are the weakness of human beings, some Mohaddethin also made a mistake in the matter of ruling on Rawayat, due to reasons of human weakness there is a disagreement with the other Mohaddethin. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
There is no work of the world in which man is involved and there is no disagreement. So disagreement is a natural process between human beings. People have different views and opinions in their ways of life according to their knowledge and wisdom. Religion and culture also affect people’s thinking. As ordinary human beings, there has been a difference of opinion between Mohaddethin in regard of the health and weaknesses of Rawayan-e-Hadeeth. But it is extremely important to understand the disagreement of critics (Aima-Niqad) and evaluate their causes compared to differences in all walks of life. Because it is related to Hadith-e- Rasool which is the interpretation of Quran and the second primary source of Islam. So that the doubts and suspicions created in the mind of people can be removed. Basically, the disagreement in trustworthiness and duplication of Ruwath is either according to the personal status of critics or principles of Jarah-o-Tadeel and in the term of their application. According to the personal status of critics there are many causes of disagreements of Mohaddethin. Aima-Niqad are different about the vastness of knowledge from each other. Due to this difference of knowledge, some Mohaddethin are familiar with the living condition of all narrators but some Mohaddethin are not aware of the general conditions or specific weakness of some narrators. Due to this difference in knowledge, Mohaddethin disagree in ordering the narrators. Some times this difference of knowledge is in the Hadith. Some of the critics are familiar with all the Hadith of the narrator. But some Aima-Niqad are ignorant of the all Hadith of narrator or Hadith of any particular shiekh or the city which are not trustworthy. Due to this reason there is a disagreement in ordering the narrators. Due to different temperaments, some become violent, aggressive and some become moderate in ordering the Hadith. So, different natures of Mohaddethin are also effective on the narrators. Some, critics due to the achievement of worldly goals, impose unjust ruling, due to their difference in the opinion of Mohaddethin about the narrators. Mistakes are the weakness of human beings, some Mohaddethin also made a mistake in the matter of ruling on Rawayat, due to reasons of human weakness there is a disagreement with the other Mohaddethin. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
URDU-CRITICISM OF AIYMA NAQAAD (THE CRITICS) ON THE RAVI IN THE TERM OF PERSONAL STATUS RESEARCH AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENCES OF MUHADDITHIN |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8 http://siarj.com/index.php/Siarj/article/view/347 https://doaj.org/toc/2413-7480 https://doaj.org/toc/2617-4308 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Shahzada Imran Ayub |
| author2Str |
Shahzada Imran Ayub |
| ppnlink |
DOAJ07859300X |
| callnumber-subject |
BP - Islam, Bahaism, Theosophy |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| callnumber-a |
BP1-253 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T13:39:49.766Z |
| _version_ |
1803565389339164672 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ045213887</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502062253.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||ara c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ045213887</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ara</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BP1-253</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KBP1-4860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muhammad Rizwan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">URDU-CRITICISM OF AIYMA NAQAAD (THE CRITICS) ON THE RAVI IN THE TERM OF PERSONAL STATUS RESEARCH AND ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENCES OF MUHADDITHIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There is no work of the world in which man is involved and there is no disagreement. So disagreement is a natural process between human beings. People have different views and opinions in their ways of life according to their knowledge and wisdom. Religion and culture also affect people’s thinking. As ordinary human beings, there has been a difference of opinion between Mohaddethin in regard of the health and weaknesses of Rawayan-e-Hadeeth. But it is extremely important to understand the disagreement of critics (Aima-Niqad) and evaluate their causes compared to differences in all walks of life. Because it is related to Hadith-e- Rasool which is the interpretation of Quran and the second primary source of Islam. So that the doubts and suspicions created in the mind of people can be removed. Basically, the disagreement in trustworthiness and duplication of Ruwath is either according to the personal status of critics or principles of Jarah-o-Tadeel and in the term of their application. According to the personal status of critics there are many causes of disagreements of Mohaddethin. Aima-Niqad are different about the vastness of knowledge from each other. Due to this difference of knowledge, some Mohaddethin are familiar with the living condition of all narrators but some Mohaddethin are not aware of the general conditions or specific weakness of some narrators. Due to this difference in knowledge, Mohaddethin disagree in ordering the narrators. Some times this difference of knowledge is in the Hadith. Some of the critics are familiar with all the Hadith of the narrator. But some Aima-Niqad are ignorant of the all Hadith of narrator or Hadith of any particular shiekh or the city which are not trustworthy. Due to this reason there is a disagreement in ordering the narrators. Due to different temperaments, some become violent, aggressive and some become moderate in ordering the Hadith. So, different natures of Mohaddethin are also effective on the narrators. Some, critics due to the achievement of worldly goals, impose unjust ruling, due to their difference in the opinion of Mohaddethin about the narrators. Mistakes are the weakness of human beings, some Mohaddethin also made a mistake in the matter of ruling on Rawayat, due to reasons of human weakness there is a disagreement with the other Mohaddethin. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Disagreement, Religion, Ravi, Hadith, Mohaddethin, Zaief, Jarh, T`adeel.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Islam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Islamic law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shahzada Imran Ayub</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">دی اسکالر</subfield><subfield code="d">Research Gateway Society, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2019), 2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ07859300X</subfield><subfield code="x">26174308</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/33c682bd2a224818a4334ac3d4417ca8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://siarj.com/index.php/Siarj/article/view/347</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2413-7480</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2617-4308</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4000187 |