PREVALENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND ENTEROCOCCUS SPP. IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS) AND RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) AT THE PARCO NAZIONALE DEI MONTI SIBILLINI, ITALY
A case control study was performed in the Parco Nazionale dei Monti Sibillini, Italy, to find out whether roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) were more likely to harbour antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli in their faeces, compared to Enterococcus spp. Ten areas were selec...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
B. Cenci Goga [verfasserIn] A. Vizzani [verfasserIn] C. Monticelli [verfasserIn] I. Nicchiarelli [verfasserIn] P. Sechi [verfasserIn] I. Pisano [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch ; Italienisch |
Erschienen: |
2009 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia spp., Enterococcus spp. |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Italian Journal of Food Safety - PAGEPress Publications, 2013, 1(2009), 5, Seite 28-33 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:1 ; year:2009 ; number:5 ; pages:28-33 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ045382867 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ045382867 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230308092252.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230227s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ045382867 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJa8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng |a ita | ||
050 | 0 | |a TP368-456 | |
100 | 0 | |a B. Cenci Goga |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a PREVALENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND ENTEROCOCCUS SPP. IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS) AND RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) AT THE PARCO NAZIONALE DEI MONTI SIBILLINI, ITALY |
264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a A case control study was performed in the Parco Nazionale dei Monti Sibillini, Italy, to find out whether roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) were more likely to harbour antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli in their faeces, compared to Enterococcus spp. Ten areas were selected and samples were collected during a fourmonths (May to August, 2008) sampling period. Samples of water (n=12) and feces (n=59), collected at 10 different sites, were cultured for E. coli and Enterococcus spp. The resulting colonies were screened for tetracycline, ampicillin and kanamycin resistance using the Lederberg Replica Plating method (breakpoint 4 μg/ml). All resistant isolates were then selected, and subjected to the CLSI antimicrobial plate susceptibility test (7). Among the water specimens contaminated by E. coli, 80% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 80% to tetracycline and 40% to kanamycin. Among the water specimens contaminated by Enterococcus spp., 14.29% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 14.29% to tetracycline and 71.3% to kanamycin. Among the 39 strains of E. coli isolated from red deer feces, 12 were resistant to ampicillin (30.77%), 5 to tetracycline (12,82%) and 3 to kanamycin (7.69%). Among the 19 strains of Enterococcus spp. isolated from red deer feces, 0 were resistant to ampicillin (0%), 1 to tetracycline (5.26%) and 19 to kanamycin (100). These are significant findings, indicating that antibiotic resistance can be found in naïve animal populations and that red deer and fallow deer could act as sentinels for antimicrobial resistance. Key words Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia | ||
650 | 4 | |a Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia spp., Enterococcus spp. | |
653 | 0 | |a Food processing and manufacture | |
700 | 0 | |a A. Vizzani |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a C. Monticelli |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a I. Nicchiarelli |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a P. Sechi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a I. Pisano |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Italian Journal of Food Safety |d PAGEPress Publications, 2013 |g 1(2009), 5, Seite 28-33 |w (DE-627)74650697X |w (DE-600)2717104-8 |x 22397132 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:2009 |g number:5 |g pages:28-33 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/a8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/ijfs/article/view/1138 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2239-7132 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 1 |j 2009 |e 5 |h 28-33 |
author_variant |
b c g bcg a v av c m cm i n in p s ps i p ip |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:22397132:2009----::rvlnefniitceitnsrisfshrcicladneoocspireeraroucpelsnrderevslpu |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2009 |
callnumber-subject-code |
TP |
publishDate |
2009 |
allfields |
10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28 doi (DE-627)DOAJ045382867 (DE-599)DOAJa8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ita TP368-456 B. Cenci Goga verfasserin aut PREVALENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND ENTEROCOCCUS SPP. IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS) AND RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) AT THE PARCO NAZIONALE DEI MONTI SIBILLINI, ITALY 2009 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A case control study was performed in the Parco Nazionale dei Monti Sibillini, Italy, to find out whether roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) were more likely to harbour antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli in their faeces, compared to Enterococcus spp. Ten areas were selected and samples were collected during a fourmonths (May to August, 2008) sampling period. Samples of water (n=12) and feces (n=59), collected at 10 different sites, were cultured for E. coli and Enterococcus spp. The resulting colonies were screened for tetracycline, ampicillin and kanamycin resistance using the Lederberg Replica Plating method (breakpoint 4 μg/ml). All resistant isolates were then selected, and subjected to the CLSI antimicrobial plate susceptibility test (7). Among the water specimens contaminated by E. coli, 80% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 80% to tetracycline and 40% to kanamycin. Among the water specimens contaminated by Enterococcus spp., 14.29% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 14.29% to tetracycline and 71.3% to kanamycin. Among the 39 strains of E. coli isolated from red deer feces, 12 were resistant to ampicillin (30.77%), 5 to tetracycline (12,82%) and 3 to kanamycin (7.69%). Among the 19 strains of Enterococcus spp. isolated from red deer feces, 0 were resistant to ampicillin (0%), 1 to tetracycline (5.26%) and 19 to kanamycin (100). These are significant findings, indicating that antibiotic resistance can be found in naïve animal populations and that red deer and fallow deer could act as sentinels for antimicrobial resistance. Key words Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia spp., Enterococcus spp. Food processing and manufacture A. Vizzani verfasserin aut C. Monticelli verfasserin aut I. Nicchiarelli verfasserin aut P. Sechi verfasserin aut I. Pisano verfasserin aut In Italian Journal of Food Safety PAGEPress Publications, 2013 1(2009), 5, Seite 28-33 (DE-627)74650697X (DE-600)2717104-8 22397132 nnns volume:1 year:2009 number:5 pages:28-33 https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416 kostenfrei http://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/ijfs/article/view/1138 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2239-7132 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 AR 1 2009 5 28-33 |
spelling |
10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28 doi (DE-627)DOAJ045382867 (DE-599)DOAJa8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ita TP368-456 B. Cenci Goga verfasserin aut PREVALENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND ENTEROCOCCUS SPP. IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS) AND RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) AT THE PARCO NAZIONALE DEI MONTI SIBILLINI, ITALY 2009 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A case control study was performed in the Parco Nazionale dei Monti Sibillini, Italy, to find out whether roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) were more likely to harbour antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli in their faeces, compared to Enterococcus spp. Ten areas were selected and samples were collected during a fourmonths (May to August, 2008) sampling period. Samples of water (n=12) and feces (n=59), collected at 10 different sites, were cultured for E. coli and Enterococcus spp. The resulting colonies were screened for tetracycline, ampicillin and kanamycin resistance using the Lederberg Replica Plating method (breakpoint 4 μg/ml). All resistant isolates were then selected, and subjected to the CLSI antimicrobial plate susceptibility test (7). Among the water specimens contaminated by E. coli, 80% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 80% to tetracycline and 40% to kanamycin. Among the water specimens contaminated by Enterococcus spp., 14.29% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 14.29% to tetracycline and 71.3% to kanamycin. Among the 39 strains of E. coli isolated from red deer feces, 12 were resistant to ampicillin (30.77%), 5 to tetracycline (12,82%) and 3 to kanamycin (7.69%). Among the 19 strains of Enterococcus spp. isolated from red deer feces, 0 were resistant to ampicillin (0%), 1 to tetracycline (5.26%) and 19 to kanamycin (100). These are significant findings, indicating that antibiotic resistance can be found in naïve animal populations and that red deer and fallow deer could act as sentinels for antimicrobial resistance. Key words Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia spp., Enterococcus spp. Food processing and manufacture A. Vizzani verfasserin aut C. Monticelli verfasserin aut I. Nicchiarelli verfasserin aut P. Sechi verfasserin aut I. Pisano verfasserin aut In Italian Journal of Food Safety PAGEPress Publications, 2013 1(2009), 5, Seite 28-33 (DE-627)74650697X (DE-600)2717104-8 22397132 nnns volume:1 year:2009 number:5 pages:28-33 https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416 kostenfrei http://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/ijfs/article/view/1138 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2239-7132 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 AR 1 2009 5 28-33 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28 doi (DE-627)DOAJ045382867 (DE-599)DOAJa8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ita TP368-456 B. Cenci Goga verfasserin aut PREVALENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND ENTEROCOCCUS SPP. IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS) AND RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) AT THE PARCO NAZIONALE DEI MONTI SIBILLINI, ITALY 2009 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A case control study was performed in the Parco Nazionale dei Monti Sibillini, Italy, to find out whether roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) were more likely to harbour antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli in their faeces, compared to Enterococcus spp. Ten areas were selected and samples were collected during a fourmonths (May to August, 2008) sampling period. Samples of water (n=12) and feces (n=59), collected at 10 different sites, were cultured for E. coli and Enterococcus spp. The resulting colonies were screened for tetracycline, ampicillin and kanamycin resistance using the Lederberg Replica Plating method (breakpoint 4 μg/ml). All resistant isolates were then selected, and subjected to the CLSI antimicrobial plate susceptibility test (7). Among the water specimens contaminated by E. coli, 80% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 80% to tetracycline and 40% to kanamycin. Among the water specimens contaminated by Enterococcus spp., 14.29% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 14.29% to tetracycline and 71.3% to kanamycin. Among the 39 strains of E. coli isolated from red deer feces, 12 were resistant to ampicillin (30.77%), 5 to tetracycline (12,82%) and 3 to kanamycin (7.69%). Among the 19 strains of Enterococcus spp. isolated from red deer feces, 0 were resistant to ampicillin (0%), 1 to tetracycline (5.26%) and 19 to kanamycin (100). These are significant findings, indicating that antibiotic resistance can be found in naïve animal populations and that red deer and fallow deer could act as sentinels for antimicrobial resistance. Key words Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia spp., Enterococcus spp. Food processing and manufacture A. Vizzani verfasserin aut C. Monticelli verfasserin aut I. Nicchiarelli verfasserin aut P. Sechi verfasserin aut I. Pisano verfasserin aut In Italian Journal of Food Safety PAGEPress Publications, 2013 1(2009), 5, Seite 28-33 (DE-627)74650697X (DE-600)2717104-8 22397132 nnns volume:1 year:2009 number:5 pages:28-33 https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416 kostenfrei http://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/ijfs/article/view/1138 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2239-7132 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 AR 1 2009 5 28-33 |
allfieldsGer |
10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28 doi (DE-627)DOAJ045382867 (DE-599)DOAJa8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ita TP368-456 B. Cenci Goga verfasserin aut PREVALENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND ENTEROCOCCUS SPP. IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS) AND RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) AT THE PARCO NAZIONALE DEI MONTI SIBILLINI, ITALY 2009 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A case control study was performed in the Parco Nazionale dei Monti Sibillini, Italy, to find out whether roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) were more likely to harbour antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli in their faeces, compared to Enterococcus spp. Ten areas were selected and samples were collected during a fourmonths (May to August, 2008) sampling period. Samples of water (n=12) and feces (n=59), collected at 10 different sites, were cultured for E. coli and Enterococcus spp. The resulting colonies were screened for tetracycline, ampicillin and kanamycin resistance using the Lederberg Replica Plating method (breakpoint 4 μg/ml). All resistant isolates were then selected, and subjected to the CLSI antimicrobial plate susceptibility test (7). Among the water specimens contaminated by E. coli, 80% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 80% to tetracycline and 40% to kanamycin. Among the water specimens contaminated by Enterococcus spp., 14.29% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 14.29% to tetracycline and 71.3% to kanamycin. Among the 39 strains of E. coli isolated from red deer feces, 12 were resistant to ampicillin (30.77%), 5 to tetracycline (12,82%) and 3 to kanamycin (7.69%). Among the 19 strains of Enterococcus spp. isolated from red deer feces, 0 were resistant to ampicillin (0%), 1 to tetracycline (5.26%) and 19 to kanamycin (100). These are significant findings, indicating that antibiotic resistance can be found in naïve animal populations and that red deer and fallow deer could act as sentinels for antimicrobial resistance. Key words Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia spp., Enterococcus spp. Food processing and manufacture A. Vizzani verfasserin aut C. Monticelli verfasserin aut I. Nicchiarelli verfasserin aut P. Sechi verfasserin aut I. Pisano verfasserin aut In Italian Journal of Food Safety PAGEPress Publications, 2013 1(2009), 5, Seite 28-33 (DE-627)74650697X (DE-600)2717104-8 22397132 nnns volume:1 year:2009 number:5 pages:28-33 https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416 kostenfrei http://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/ijfs/article/view/1138 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2239-7132 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 AR 1 2009 5 28-33 |
allfieldsSound |
10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28 doi (DE-627)DOAJ045382867 (DE-599)DOAJa8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ita TP368-456 B. Cenci Goga verfasserin aut PREVALENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND ENTEROCOCCUS SPP. IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS) AND RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) AT THE PARCO NAZIONALE DEI MONTI SIBILLINI, ITALY 2009 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A case control study was performed in the Parco Nazionale dei Monti Sibillini, Italy, to find out whether roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) were more likely to harbour antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli in their faeces, compared to Enterococcus spp. Ten areas were selected and samples were collected during a fourmonths (May to August, 2008) sampling period. Samples of water (n=12) and feces (n=59), collected at 10 different sites, were cultured for E. coli and Enterococcus spp. The resulting colonies were screened for tetracycline, ampicillin and kanamycin resistance using the Lederberg Replica Plating method (breakpoint 4 μg/ml). All resistant isolates were then selected, and subjected to the CLSI antimicrobial plate susceptibility test (7). Among the water specimens contaminated by E. coli, 80% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 80% to tetracycline and 40% to kanamycin. Among the water specimens contaminated by Enterococcus spp., 14.29% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 14.29% to tetracycline and 71.3% to kanamycin. Among the 39 strains of E. coli isolated from red deer feces, 12 were resistant to ampicillin (30.77%), 5 to tetracycline (12,82%) and 3 to kanamycin (7.69%). Among the 19 strains of Enterococcus spp. isolated from red deer feces, 0 were resistant to ampicillin (0%), 1 to tetracycline (5.26%) and 19 to kanamycin (100). These are significant findings, indicating that antibiotic resistance can be found in naïve animal populations and that red deer and fallow deer could act as sentinels for antimicrobial resistance. Key words Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia spp., Enterococcus spp. Food processing and manufacture A. Vizzani verfasserin aut C. Monticelli verfasserin aut I. Nicchiarelli verfasserin aut P. Sechi verfasserin aut I. Pisano verfasserin aut In Italian Journal of Food Safety PAGEPress Publications, 2013 1(2009), 5, Seite 28-33 (DE-627)74650697X (DE-600)2717104-8 22397132 nnns volume:1 year:2009 number:5 pages:28-33 https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416 kostenfrei http://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/ijfs/article/view/1138 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2239-7132 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 AR 1 2009 5 28-33 |
language |
English Italian |
source |
In Italian Journal of Food Safety 1(2009), 5, Seite 28-33 volume:1 year:2009 number:5 pages:28-33 |
sourceStr |
In Italian Journal of Food Safety 1(2009), 5, Seite 28-33 volume:1 year:2009 number:5 pages:28-33 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia spp., Enterococcus spp. Food processing and manufacture |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Italian Journal of Food Safety |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
B. Cenci Goga @@aut@@ A. Vizzani @@aut@@ C. Monticelli @@aut@@ I. Nicchiarelli @@aut@@ P. Sechi @@aut@@ I. Pisano @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
74650697X |
id |
DOAJ045382867 |
language_de |
englisch italienisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ045382867</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308092252.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ045382867</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJa8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">ita</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP368-456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">B. Cenci Goga</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">PREVALENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND ENTEROCOCCUS SPP. IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS) AND RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) AT THE PARCO NAZIONALE DEI MONTI SIBILLINI, ITALY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A case control study was performed in the Parco Nazionale dei Monti Sibillini, Italy, to find out whether roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) were more likely to harbour antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli in their faeces, compared to Enterococcus spp. Ten areas were selected and samples were collected during a fourmonths (May to August, 2008) sampling period. Samples of water (n=12) and feces (n=59), collected at 10 different sites, were cultured for E. coli and Enterococcus spp. The resulting colonies were screened for tetracycline, ampicillin and kanamycin resistance using the Lederberg Replica Plating method (breakpoint 4 &mu;g/ml). All resistant isolates were then selected, and subjected to the CLSI antimicrobial plate susceptibility test (7). Among the water specimens contaminated by E. coli, 80% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 80% to tetracycline and 40% to kanamycin. Among the water specimens contaminated by Enterococcus spp., 14.29% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 14.29% to tetracycline and 71.3% to kanamycin. Among the 39 strains of E. coli isolated from red deer feces, 12 were resistant to ampicillin (30.77%), 5 to tetracycline (12,82%) and 3 to kanamycin (7.69%). Among the 19 strains of Enterococcus spp. isolated from red deer feces, 0 were resistant to ampicillin (0%), 1 to tetracycline (5.26%) and 19 to kanamycin (100). These are significant findings, indicating that antibiotic resistance can be found in na&iuml;ve animal populations and that red deer and fallow deer could act as sentinels for antimicrobial resistance. Key words Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia spp., Enterococcus spp.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Food processing and manufacture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A. Vizzani</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">C. Monticelli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I. Nicchiarelli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">P. Sechi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I. Pisano</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Italian Journal of Food Safety</subfield><subfield code="d">PAGEPress Publications, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2009), 5, Seite 28-33</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)74650697X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2717104-8</subfield><subfield code="x">22397132</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2009</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:28-33</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/a8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/ijfs/article/view/1138</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2239-7132</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2009</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">28-33</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
author |
B. Cenci Goga |
spellingShingle |
B. Cenci Goga misc TP368-456 misc Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia spp., Enterococcus spp. misc Food processing and manufacture PREVALENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND ENTEROCOCCUS SPP. IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS) AND RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) AT THE PARCO NAZIONALE DEI MONTI SIBILLINI, ITALY |
authorStr |
B. Cenci Goga |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)74650697X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
TP368-456 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
22397132 |
topic_title |
TP368-456 PREVALENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND ENTEROCOCCUS SPP. IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS) AND RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) AT THE PARCO NAZIONALE DEI MONTI SIBILLINI, ITALY Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia spp., Enterococcus spp |
topic |
misc TP368-456 misc Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia spp., Enterococcus spp. misc Food processing and manufacture |
topic_unstemmed |
misc TP368-456 misc Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia spp., Enterococcus spp. misc Food processing and manufacture |
topic_browse |
misc TP368-456 misc Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia spp., Enterococcus spp. misc Food processing and manufacture |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Italian Journal of Food Safety |
hierarchy_parent_id |
74650697X |
hierarchy_top_title |
Italian Journal of Food Safety |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)74650697X (DE-600)2717104-8 |
title |
PREVALENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND ENTEROCOCCUS SPP. IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS) AND RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) AT THE PARCO NAZIONALE DEI MONTI SIBILLINI, ITALY |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ045382867 (DE-599)DOAJa8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416 |
title_full |
PREVALENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND ENTEROCOCCUS SPP. IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS) AND RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) AT THE PARCO NAZIONALE DEI MONTI SIBILLINI, ITALY |
author_sort |
B. Cenci Goga |
journal |
Italian Journal of Food Safety |
journalStr |
Italian Journal of Food Safety |
callnumber-first-code |
T |
lang_code |
eng ita |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2009 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
28 |
author_browse |
B. Cenci Goga A. Vizzani C. Monticelli I. Nicchiarelli P. Sechi I. Pisano |
container_volume |
1 |
class |
TP368-456 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
B. Cenci Goga |
doi_str_mv |
10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
prevalence of antibiotic resistant strains of escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. in roe deer (capreolus capreolus) and red deer (cervus elaphus) at the parco nazionale dei monti sibillini, italy |
callnumber |
TP368-456 |
title_auth |
PREVALENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND ENTEROCOCCUS SPP. IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS) AND RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) AT THE PARCO NAZIONALE DEI MONTI SIBILLINI, ITALY |
abstract |
A case control study was performed in the Parco Nazionale dei Monti Sibillini, Italy, to find out whether roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) were more likely to harbour antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli in their faeces, compared to Enterococcus spp. Ten areas were selected and samples were collected during a fourmonths (May to August, 2008) sampling period. Samples of water (n=12) and feces (n=59), collected at 10 different sites, were cultured for E. coli and Enterococcus spp. The resulting colonies were screened for tetracycline, ampicillin and kanamycin resistance using the Lederberg Replica Plating method (breakpoint 4 μg/ml). All resistant isolates were then selected, and subjected to the CLSI antimicrobial plate susceptibility test (7). Among the water specimens contaminated by E. coli, 80% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 80% to tetracycline and 40% to kanamycin. Among the water specimens contaminated by Enterococcus spp., 14.29% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 14.29% to tetracycline and 71.3% to kanamycin. Among the 39 strains of E. coli isolated from red deer feces, 12 were resistant to ampicillin (30.77%), 5 to tetracycline (12,82%) and 3 to kanamycin (7.69%). Among the 19 strains of Enterococcus spp. isolated from red deer feces, 0 were resistant to ampicillin (0%), 1 to tetracycline (5.26%) and 19 to kanamycin (100). These are significant findings, indicating that antibiotic resistance can be found in naïve animal populations and that red deer and fallow deer could act as sentinels for antimicrobial resistance. Key words Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia |
abstractGer |
A case control study was performed in the Parco Nazionale dei Monti Sibillini, Italy, to find out whether roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) were more likely to harbour antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli in their faeces, compared to Enterococcus spp. Ten areas were selected and samples were collected during a fourmonths (May to August, 2008) sampling period. Samples of water (n=12) and feces (n=59), collected at 10 different sites, were cultured for E. coli and Enterococcus spp. The resulting colonies were screened for tetracycline, ampicillin and kanamycin resistance using the Lederberg Replica Plating method (breakpoint 4 μg/ml). All resistant isolates were then selected, and subjected to the CLSI antimicrobial plate susceptibility test (7). Among the water specimens contaminated by E. coli, 80% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 80% to tetracycline and 40% to kanamycin. Among the water specimens contaminated by Enterococcus spp., 14.29% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 14.29% to tetracycline and 71.3% to kanamycin. Among the 39 strains of E. coli isolated from red deer feces, 12 were resistant to ampicillin (30.77%), 5 to tetracycline (12,82%) and 3 to kanamycin (7.69%). Among the 19 strains of Enterococcus spp. isolated from red deer feces, 0 were resistant to ampicillin (0%), 1 to tetracycline (5.26%) and 19 to kanamycin (100). These are significant findings, indicating that antibiotic resistance can be found in naïve animal populations and that red deer and fallow deer could act as sentinels for antimicrobial resistance. Key words Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia |
abstract_unstemmed |
A case control study was performed in the Parco Nazionale dei Monti Sibillini, Italy, to find out whether roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) were more likely to harbour antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli in their faeces, compared to Enterococcus spp. Ten areas were selected and samples were collected during a fourmonths (May to August, 2008) sampling period. Samples of water (n=12) and feces (n=59), collected at 10 different sites, were cultured for E. coli and Enterococcus spp. The resulting colonies were screened for tetracycline, ampicillin and kanamycin resistance using the Lederberg Replica Plating method (breakpoint 4 μg/ml). All resistant isolates were then selected, and subjected to the CLSI antimicrobial plate susceptibility test (7). Among the water specimens contaminated by E. coli, 80% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 80% to tetracycline and 40% to kanamycin. Among the water specimens contaminated by Enterococcus spp., 14.29% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 14.29% to tetracycline and 71.3% to kanamycin. Among the 39 strains of E. coli isolated from red deer feces, 12 were resistant to ampicillin (30.77%), 5 to tetracycline (12,82%) and 3 to kanamycin (7.69%). Among the 19 strains of Enterococcus spp. isolated from red deer feces, 0 were resistant to ampicillin (0%), 1 to tetracycline (5.26%) and 19 to kanamycin (100). These are significant findings, indicating that antibiotic resistance can be found in naïve animal populations and that red deer and fallow deer could act as sentinels for antimicrobial resistance. Key words Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 |
container_issue |
5 |
title_short |
PREVALENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND ENTEROCOCCUS SPP. IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS) AND RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) AT THE PARCO NAZIONALE DEI MONTI SIBILLINI, ITALY |
url |
https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28 https://doaj.org/article/a8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416 http://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/ijfs/article/view/1138 https://doaj.org/toc/2239-7132 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
A. Vizzani C. Monticelli I. Nicchiarelli P. Sechi I. Pisano |
author2Str |
A. Vizzani C. Monticelli I. Nicchiarelli P. Sechi I. Pisano |
ppnlink |
74650697X |
callnumber-subject |
TP - Chemical Technology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28 |
callnumber-a |
TP368-456 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T14:39:59.258Z |
_version_ |
1803569174168993792 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ045382867</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308092252.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ045382867</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJa8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">ita</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP368-456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">B. Cenci Goga</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">PREVALENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND ENTEROCOCCUS SPP. IN ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS) AND RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) AT THE PARCO NAZIONALE DEI MONTI SIBILLINI, ITALY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A case control study was performed in the Parco Nazionale dei Monti Sibillini, Italy, to find out whether roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) were more likely to harbour antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli in their faeces, compared to Enterococcus spp. Ten areas were selected and samples were collected during a fourmonths (May to August, 2008) sampling period. Samples of water (n=12) and feces (n=59), collected at 10 different sites, were cultured for E. coli and Enterococcus spp. The resulting colonies were screened for tetracycline, ampicillin and kanamycin resistance using the Lederberg Replica Plating method (breakpoint 4 &mu;g/ml). All resistant isolates were then selected, and subjected to the CLSI antimicrobial plate susceptibility test (7). Among the water specimens contaminated by E. coli, 80% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 80% to tetracycline and 40% to kanamycin. Among the water specimens contaminated by Enterococcus spp., 14.29% were found to be resistant to ampicillin, 14.29% to tetracycline and 71.3% to kanamycin. Among the 39 strains of E. coli isolated from red deer feces, 12 were resistant to ampicillin (30.77%), 5 to tetracycline (12,82%) and 3 to kanamycin (7.69%). Among the 19 strains of Enterococcus spp. isolated from red deer feces, 0 were resistant to ampicillin (0%), 1 to tetracycline (5.26%) and 19 to kanamycin (100). These are significant findings, indicating that antibiotic resistance can be found in na&iuml;ve animal populations and that red deer and fallow deer could act as sentinels for antimicrobial resistance. Key words Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Antibiotic-resistance, red deer, fallow deer, Escherichia spp., Enterococcus spp.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Food processing and manufacture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A. Vizzani</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">C. Monticelli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I. Nicchiarelli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">P. Sechi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I. Pisano</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Italian Journal of Food Safety</subfield><subfield code="d">PAGEPress Publications, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2009), 5, Seite 28-33</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)74650697X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2717104-8</subfield><subfield code="x">22397132</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2009</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:28-33</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2009.5.28</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/a8645cabf2bc470b9c05a365d1c82416</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/ijfs/article/view/1138</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2239-7132</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2009</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">28-33</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4021883 |