A Comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy

Background: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in population and post tonsillectomy pain affects analgesic consumption, hospital stay, oral intake and return to regular activity. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the study was to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods: This was a placebo-controlled study to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Ninety patients were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients were divided in 3 groups on the basis of whether they received Peritonsillar dexmedetomidine, intravenous dexmedetomidine or intravenous normal saline. The groups were compared for post-operative pain, time to first request of rescue analgesia (duration of analgesia), post-operative sedation, analgesic requirement during first 24 hours and side effects. SSPS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis and p value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Out of total 90 patients included in this study there was a female preponderance with a M: F ratio of 1:1.5. The mean age and ASA grades and mean duration of surgery of patients in all 3 groups were found to be comparable with no statistically significant difference in any of the groups (P<0.05). Preoperative mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures as well as mean arterial pressure and SPO2 was found to be comparable in all 3 groups. However intraoperative blood pressures (systolic, diastolic as well as mean arterial pressures) and SPO2 showed significant difference amongst the groups (P<0.05). Time to first request of rescue analgesia was found to be more in group - Dpt than group – Div and group – Pb which was highly statistically significant (p <0.0001).There was statistical significant difference in number of diclofenac injections consumed during first 24 hours between group – Dpt & group – Div and highly significant difference between group – Dpt & group – Pb, group – Div & group – Pb. Conclusion: Peritonsillar infiltration of dexmedetomidine is better alternative to intravenous dexmedetomidine in tonsillar surgeries. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Priya Vishwanath Lahane [verfasserIn] Niteen. Khanderao Nandanvankar [verfasserIn] Meenakshi Sumadevi Pradeep [verfasserIn] Nazima Yusuf Memon [verfasserIn] Shridhar Devidas Yennawar [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2020

Schlagwörter:	tonsillar surgery dexmedetomidine analgesia sedation hemodynamics spo2

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Asian Journal of Medical Sciences - Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, 2020, 11(2020), 6, Seite 89-95
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:11 ; year:2020 ; number:6 ; pages:89-95

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ045948399

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ045948399
003	DE-627
005	20230308101159.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ045948399
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJa161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	0		\|a Priya Vishwanath Lahane \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	2	\|a A Comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy
264		1	\|c 2020
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Background: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in population and post tonsillectomy pain affects analgesic consumption, hospital stay, oral intake and return to regular activity. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the study was to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods: This was a placebo-controlled study to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Ninety patients were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients were divided in 3 groups on the basis of whether they received Peritonsillar dexmedetomidine, intravenous dexmedetomidine or intravenous normal saline. The groups were compared for post-operative pain, time to first request of rescue analgesia (duration of analgesia), post-operative sedation, analgesic requirement during first 24 hours and side effects. SSPS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis and p value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Out of total 90 patients included in this study there was a female preponderance with a M: F ratio of 1:1.5. The mean age and ASA grades and mean duration of surgery of patients in all 3 groups were found to be comparable with no statistically significant difference in any of the groups (P<0.05). Preoperative mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures as well as mean arterial pressure and SPO2 was found to be comparable in all 3 groups. However intraoperative blood pressures (systolic, diastolic as well as mean arterial pressures) and SPO2 showed significant difference amongst the groups (P<0.05). Time to first request of rescue analgesia was found to be more in group - Dpt than group – Div and group – Pb which was highly statistically significant (p <0.0001).There was statistical significant difference in number of diclofenac injections consumed during first 24 hours between group – Dpt & group – Div and highly significant difference between group – Dpt & group – Pb, group – Div & group – Pb. Conclusion: Peritonsillar infiltration of dexmedetomidine is better alternative to intravenous dexmedetomidine in tonsillar surgeries.
650		4	\|a tonsillar surgery
650		4	\|a dexmedetomidine
650		4	\|a analgesia
650		4	\|a sedation hemodynamics
650		4	\|a spo2
653		0	\|a Medicine
653		0	\|a R
700	0		\|a Niteen. Khanderao Nandanvankar \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Meenakshi Sumadevi Pradeep \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Nazima Yusuf Memon \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Shridhar Devidas Yennawar \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Asian Journal of Medical Sciences \|d Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, 2020 \|g 11(2020), 6, Seite 89-95 \|w (DE-627)887837441 \|w (DE-600)2894889-0 \|x 20910576 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:11 \|g year:2020 \|g number:6 \|g pages:89-95
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v11i6.30639 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/a161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/30639 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2467-9100 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0576 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 11 \|j 2020 \|e 6 \|h 89-95

Indexfelder

author_variant	p v l pvl n k n nkn m s p msp n y m nym s d y sdy
matchkey_str	article:20910576:2020----::cmaaietdoitaprtvprtnilrnitainessnrvnudxmdtmdnfre
hierarchy_sort_str	2020
publishDate	2020
allfields	(DE-627)DOAJ045948399 (DE-599)DOAJa161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Priya Vishwanath Lahane verfasserin aut A Comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in population and post tonsillectomy pain affects analgesic consumption, hospital stay, oral intake and return to regular activity. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the study was to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods: This was a placebo-controlled study to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Ninety patients were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients were divided in 3 groups on the basis of whether they received Peritonsillar dexmedetomidine, intravenous dexmedetomidine or intravenous normal saline. The groups were compared for post-operative pain, time to first request of rescue analgesia (duration of analgesia), post-operative sedation, analgesic requirement during first 24 hours and side effects. SSPS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis and p value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Out of total 90 patients included in this study there was a female preponderance with a M: F ratio of 1:1.5. The mean age and ASA grades and mean duration of surgery of patients in all 3 groups were found to be comparable with no statistically significant difference in any of the groups (P<0.05). Preoperative mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures as well as mean arterial pressure and SPO2 was found to be comparable in all 3 groups. However intraoperative blood pressures (systolic, diastolic as well as mean arterial pressures) and SPO2 showed significant difference amongst the groups (P<0.05). Time to first request of rescue analgesia was found to be more in group - Dpt than group – Div and group – Pb which was highly statistically significant (p <0.0001).There was statistical significant difference in number of diclofenac injections consumed during first 24 hours between group – Dpt & group – Div and highly significant difference between group – Dpt & group – Pb, group – Div & group – Pb. Conclusion: Peritonsillar infiltration of dexmedetomidine is better alternative to intravenous dexmedetomidine in tonsillar surgeries. tonsillar surgery dexmedetomidine analgesia sedation hemodynamics spo2 Medicine R Niteen. Khanderao Nandanvankar verfasserin aut Meenakshi Sumadevi Pradeep verfasserin aut Nazima Yusuf Memon verfasserin aut Shridhar Devidas Yennawar verfasserin aut In Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, 2020 11(2020), 6, Seite 89-95 (DE-627)887837441 (DE-600)2894889-0 20910576 nnns volume:11 year:2020 number:6 pages:89-95 https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v11i6.30639 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08 kostenfrei https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/30639 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2467-9100 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0576 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2020 6 89-95
spelling	(DE-627)DOAJ045948399 (DE-599)DOAJa161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Priya Vishwanath Lahane verfasserin aut A Comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in population and post tonsillectomy pain affects analgesic consumption, hospital stay, oral intake and return to regular activity. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the study was to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods: This was a placebo-controlled study to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Ninety patients were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients were divided in 3 groups on the basis of whether they received Peritonsillar dexmedetomidine, intravenous dexmedetomidine or intravenous normal saline. The groups were compared for post-operative pain, time to first request of rescue analgesia (duration of analgesia), post-operative sedation, analgesic requirement during first 24 hours and side effects. SSPS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis and p value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Out of total 90 patients included in this study there was a female preponderance with a M: F ratio of 1:1.5. The mean age and ASA grades and mean duration of surgery of patients in all 3 groups were found to be comparable with no statistically significant difference in any of the groups (P<0.05). Preoperative mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures as well as mean arterial pressure and SPO2 was found to be comparable in all 3 groups. However intraoperative blood pressures (systolic, diastolic as well as mean arterial pressures) and SPO2 showed significant difference amongst the groups (P<0.05). Time to first request of rescue analgesia was found to be more in group - Dpt than group – Div and group – Pb which was highly statistically significant (p <0.0001).There was statistical significant difference in number of diclofenac injections consumed during first 24 hours between group – Dpt & group – Div and highly significant difference between group – Dpt & group – Pb, group – Div & group – Pb. Conclusion: Peritonsillar infiltration of dexmedetomidine is better alternative to intravenous dexmedetomidine in tonsillar surgeries. tonsillar surgery dexmedetomidine analgesia sedation hemodynamics spo2 Medicine R Niteen. Khanderao Nandanvankar verfasserin aut Meenakshi Sumadevi Pradeep verfasserin aut Nazima Yusuf Memon verfasserin aut Shridhar Devidas Yennawar verfasserin aut In Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, 2020 11(2020), 6, Seite 89-95 (DE-627)887837441 (DE-600)2894889-0 20910576 nnns volume:11 year:2020 number:6 pages:89-95 https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v11i6.30639 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08 kostenfrei https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/30639 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2467-9100 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0576 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2020 6 89-95
allfields_unstemmed	(DE-627)DOAJ045948399 (DE-599)DOAJa161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Priya Vishwanath Lahane verfasserin aut A Comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in population and post tonsillectomy pain affects analgesic consumption, hospital stay, oral intake and return to regular activity. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the study was to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods: This was a placebo-controlled study to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Ninety patients were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients were divided in 3 groups on the basis of whether they received Peritonsillar dexmedetomidine, intravenous dexmedetomidine or intravenous normal saline. The groups were compared for post-operative pain, time to first request of rescue analgesia (duration of analgesia), post-operative sedation, analgesic requirement during first 24 hours and side effects. SSPS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis and p value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Out of total 90 patients included in this study there was a female preponderance with a M: F ratio of 1:1.5. The mean age and ASA grades and mean duration of surgery of patients in all 3 groups were found to be comparable with no statistically significant difference in any of the groups (P<0.05). Preoperative mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures as well as mean arterial pressure and SPO2 was found to be comparable in all 3 groups. However intraoperative blood pressures (systolic, diastolic as well as mean arterial pressures) and SPO2 showed significant difference amongst the groups (P<0.05). Time to first request of rescue analgesia was found to be more in group - Dpt than group – Div and group – Pb which was highly statistically significant (p <0.0001).There was statistical significant difference in number of diclofenac injections consumed during first 24 hours between group – Dpt & group – Div and highly significant difference between group – Dpt & group – Pb, group – Div & group – Pb. Conclusion: Peritonsillar infiltration of dexmedetomidine is better alternative to intravenous dexmedetomidine in tonsillar surgeries. tonsillar surgery dexmedetomidine analgesia sedation hemodynamics spo2 Medicine R Niteen. Khanderao Nandanvankar verfasserin aut Meenakshi Sumadevi Pradeep verfasserin aut Nazima Yusuf Memon verfasserin aut Shridhar Devidas Yennawar verfasserin aut In Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, 2020 11(2020), 6, Seite 89-95 (DE-627)887837441 (DE-600)2894889-0 20910576 nnns volume:11 year:2020 number:6 pages:89-95 https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v11i6.30639 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08 kostenfrei https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/30639 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2467-9100 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0576 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2020 6 89-95
allfieldsGer	(DE-627)DOAJ045948399 (DE-599)DOAJa161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Priya Vishwanath Lahane verfasserin aut A Comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in population and post tonsillectomy pain affects analgesic consumption, hospital stay, oral intake and return to regular activity. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the study was to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods: This was a placebo-controlled study to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Ninety patients were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients were divided in 3 groups on the basis of whether they received Peritonsillar dexmedetomidine, intravenous dexmedetomidine or intravenous normal saline. The groups were compared for post-operative pain, time to first request of rescue analgesia (duration of analgesia), post-operative sedation, analgesic requirement during first 24 hours and side effects. SSPS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis and p value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Out of total 90 patients included in this study there was a female preponderance with a M: F ratio of 1:1.5. The mean age and ASA grades and mean duration of surgery of patients in all 3 groups were found to be comparable with no statistically significant difference in any of the groups (P<0.05). Preoperative mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures as well as mean arterial pressure and SPO2 was found to be comparable in all 3 groups. However intraoperative blood pressures (systolic, diastolic as well as mean arterial pressures) and SPO2 showed significant difference amongst the groups (P<0.05). Time to first request of rescue analgesia was found to be more in group - Dpt than group – Div and group – Pb which was highly statistically significant (p <0.0001).There was statistical significant difference in number of diclofenac injections consumed during first 24 hours between group – Dpt & group – Div and highly significant difference between group – Dpt & group – Pb, group – Div & group – Pb. Conclusion: Peritonsillar infiltration of dexmedetomidine is better alternative to intravenous dexmedetomidine in tonsillar surgeries. tonsillar surgery dexmedetomidine analgesia sedation hemodynamics spo2 Medicine R Niteen. Khanderao Nandanvankar verfasserin aut Meenakshi Sumadevi Pradeep verfasserin aut Nazima Yusuf Memon verfasserin aut Shridhar Devidas Yennawar verfasserin aut In Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, 2020 11(2020), 6, Seite 89-95 (DE-627)887837441 (DE-600)2894889-0 20910576 nnns volume:11 year:2020 number:6 pages:89-95 https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v11i6.30639 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08 kostenfrei https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/30639 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2467-9100 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0576 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2020 6 89-95
allfieldsSound	(DE-627)DOAJ045948399 (DE-599)DOAJa161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Priya Vishwanath Lahane verfasserin aut A Comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in population and post tonsillectomy pain affects analgesic consumption, hospital stay, oral intake and return to regular activity. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the study was to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods: This was a placebo-controlled study to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Ninety patients were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients were divided in 3 groups on the basis of whether they received Peritonsillar dexmedetomidine, intravenous dexmedetomidine or intravenous normal saline. The groups were compared for post-operative pain, time to first request of rescue analgesia (duration of analgesia), post-operative sedation, analgesic requirement during first 24 hours and side effects. SSPS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis and p value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Out of total 90 patients included in this study there was a female preponderance with a M: F ratio of 1:1.5. The mean age and ASA grades and mean duration of surgery of patients in all 3 groups were found to be comparable with no statistically significant difference in any of the groups (P<0.05). Preoperative mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures as well as mean arterial pressure and SPO2 was found to be comparable in all 3 groups. However intraoperative blood pressures (systolic, diastolic as well as mean arterial pressures) and SPO2 showed significant difference amongst the groups (P<0.05). Time to first request of rescue analgesia was found to be more in group - Dpt than group – Div and group – Pb which was highly statistically significant (p <0.0001).There was statistical significant difference in number of diclofenac injections consumed during first 24 hours between group – Dpt & group – Div and highly significant difference between group – Dpt & group – Pb, group – Div & group – Pb. Conclusion: Peritonsillar infiltration of dexmedetomidine is better alternative to intravenous dexmedetomidine in tonsillar surgeries. tonsillar surgery dexmedetomidine analgesia sedation hemodynamics spo2 Medicine R Niteen. Khanderao Nandanvankar verfasserin aut Meenakshi Sumadevi Pradeep verfasserin aut Nazima Yusuf Memon verfasserin aut Shridhar Devidas Yennawar verfasserin aut In Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, 2020 11(2020), 6, Seite 89-95 (DE-627)887837441 (DE-600)2894889-0 20910576 nnns volume:11 year:2020 number:6 pages:89-95 https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v11i6.30639 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08 kostenfrei https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/30639 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2467-9100 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0576 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2020 6 89-95
language	English
source	In Asian Journal of Medical Sciences 11(2020), 6, Seite 89-95 volume:11 year:2020 number:6 pages:89-95
sourceStr	In Asian Journal of Medical Sciences 11(2020), 6, Seite 89-95 volume:11 year:2020 number:6 pages:89-95
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	tonsillar surgery dexmedetomidine analgesia sedation hemodynamics spo2 Medicine R
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Priya Vishwanath Lahane @@aut@@ Niteen. Khanderao Nandanvankar @@aut@@ Meenakshi Sumadevi Pradeep @@aut@@ Nazima Yusuf Memon @@aut@@ Shridhar Devidas Yennawar @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	887837441
id	DOAJ045948399
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ045948399</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308101159.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ045948399</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJa161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Priya Vishwanath Lahane</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A Comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in population and post tonsillectomy pain affects analgesic consumption, hospital stay, oral intake and return to regular activity. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the study was to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods: This was a placebo-controlled study to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Ninety patients were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients were divided in 3 groups on the basis of whether they received Peritonsillar dexmedetomidine, intravenous dexmedetomidine or intravenous normal saline. The groups were compared for post-operative pain, time to first request of rescue analgesia (duration of analgesia), post-operative sedation, analgesic requirement during first 24 hours and side effects. SSPS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis and p value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Out of total 90 patients included in this study there was a female preponderance with a M: F ratio of 1:1.5. The mean age and ASA grades and mean duration of surgery of patients in all 3 groups were found to be comparable with no statistically significant difference in any of the groups (P<0.05). Preoperative mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures as well as mean arterial pressure and SPO2 was found to be comparable in all 3 groups. However intraoperative blood pressures (systolic, diastolic as well as mean arterial pressures) and SPO2 showed significant difference amongst the groups (P<0.05). Time to first request of rescue analgesia was found to be more in group - Dpt than group – Div and group – Pb which was highly statistically significant (p <0.0001).There was statistical significant difference in number of diclofenac injections consumed during first 24 hours between group – Dpt & group – Div and highly significant difference between group – Dpt & group – Pb, group – Div & group – Pb. Conclusion: Peritonsillar infiltration of dexmedetomidine is better alternative to intravenous dexmedetomidine in tonsillar surgeries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">tonsillar surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">dexmedetomidine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">analgesia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sedation hemodynamics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">spo2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Niteen. Khanderao Nandanvankar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meenakshi Sumadevi Pradeep</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nazima Yusuf Memon</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shridhar Devidas Yennawar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Asian Journal of Medical Sciences</subfield><subfield code="d">Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2020), 6, Seite 89-95</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)887837441</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2894889-0</subfield><subfield code="x">20910576</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:89-95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v11i6.30639</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/a161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/30639</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2467-9100</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0576</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">89-95</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Priya Vishwanath Lahane
spellingShingle	Priya Vishwanath Lahane misc tonsillar surgery misc dexmedetomidine misc analgesia misc sedation hemodynamics misc spo2 misc Medicine misc R A Comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy
authorStr	Priya Vishwanath Lahane
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)887837441
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	20910576
topic_title	A Comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy tonsillar surgery dexmedetomidine analgesia sedation hemodynamics spo2
topic	misc tonsillar surgery misc dexmedetomidine misc analgesia misc sedation hemodynamics misc spo2 misc Medicine misc R
topic_unstemmed	misc tonsillar surgery misc dexmedetomidine misc analgesia misc sedation hemodynamics misc spo2 misc Medicine misc R
topic_browse	misc tonsillar surgery misc dexmedetomidine misc analgesia misc sedation hemodynamics misc spo2 misc Medicine misc R
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id	887837441
hierarchy_top_title	Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)887837441 (DE-600)2894889-0
title	A Comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ045948399 (DE-599)DOAJa161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08
title_full	A Comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy
author_sort	Priya Vishwanath Lahane
journal	Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
journalStr	Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2020
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	89
author_browse	Priya Vishwanath Lahane Niteen. Khanderao Nandanvankar Meenakshi Sumadevi Pradeep Nazima Yusuf Memon Shridhar Devidas Yennawar
container_volume	11
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Priya Vishwanath Lahane
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy
title_auth	A Comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy
abstract	Background: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in population and post tonsillectomy pain affects analgesic consumption, hospital stay, oral intake and return to regular activity. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the study was to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods: This was a placebo-controlled study to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Ninety patients were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients were divided in 3 groups on the basis of whether they received Peritonsillar dexmedetomidine, intravenous dexmedetomidine or intravenous normal saline. The groups were compared for post-operative pain, time to first request of rescue analgesia (duration of analgesia), post-operative sedation, analgesic requirement during first 24 hours and side effects. SSPS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis and p value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Out of total 90 patients included in this study there was a female preponderance with a M: F ratio of 1:1.5. The mean age and ASA grades and mean duration of surgery of patients in all 3 groups were found to be comparable with no statistically significant difference in any of the groups (P<0.05). Preoperative mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures as well as mean arterial pressure and SPO2 was found to be comparable in all 3 groups. However intraoperative blood pressures (systolic, diastolic as well as mean arterial pressures) and SPO2 showed significant difference amongst the groups (P<0.05). Time to first request of rescue analgesia was found to be more in group - Dpt than group – Div and group – Pb which was highly statistically significant (p <0.0001).There was statistical significant difference in number of diclofenac injections consumed during first 24 hours between group – Dpt & group – Div and highly significant difference between group – Dpt & group – Pb, group – Div & group – Pb. Conclusion: Peritonsillar infiltration of dexmedetomidine is better alternative to intravenous dexmedetomidine in tonsillar surgeries.
abstractGer	Background: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in population and post tonsillectomy pain affects analgesic consumption, hospital stay, oral intake and return to regular activity. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the study was to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods: This was a placebo-controlled study to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Ninety patients were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients were divided in 3 groups on the basis of whether they received Peritonsillar dexmedetomidine, intravenous dexmedetomidine or intravenous normal saline. The groups were compared for post-operative pain, time to first request of rescue analgesia (duration of analgesia), post-operative sedation, analgesic requirement during first 24 hours and side effects. SSPS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis and p value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Out of total 90 patients included in this study there was a female preponderance with a M: F ratio of 1:1.5. The mean age and ASA grades and mean duration of surgery of patients in all 3 groups were found to be comparable with no statistically significant difference in any of the groups (P<0.05). Preoperative mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures as well as mean arterial pressure and SPO2 was found to be comparable in all 3 groups. However intraoperative blood pressures (systolic, diastolic as well as mean arterial pressures) and SPO2 showed significant difference amongst the groups (P<0.05). Time to first request of rescue analgesia was found to be more in group - Dpt than group – Div and group – Pb which was highly statistically significant (p <0.0001).There was statistical significant difference in number of diclofenac injections consumed during first 24 hours between group – Dpt & group – Div and highly significant difference between group – Dpt & group – Pb, group – Div & group – Pb. Conclusion: Peritonsillar infiltration of dexmedetomidine is better alternative to intravenous dexmedetomidine in tonsillar surgeries.
abstract_unstemmed	Background: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in population and post tonsillectomy pain affects analgesic consumption, hospital stay, oral intake and return to regular activity. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the study was to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods: This was a placebo-controlled study to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Ninety patients were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients were divided in 3 groups on the basis of whether they received Peritonsillar dexmedetomidine, intravenous dexmedetomidine or intravenous normal saline. The groups were compared for post-operative pain, time to first request of rescue analgesia (duration of analgesia), post-operative sedation, analgesic requirement during first 24 hours and side effects. SSPS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis and p value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Out of total 90 patients included in this study there was a female preponderance with a M: F ratio of 1:1.5. The mean age and ASA grades and mean duration of surgery of patients in all 3 groups were found to be comparable with no statistically significant difference in any of the groups (P<0.05). Preoperative mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures as well as mean arterial pressure and SPO2 was found to be comparable in all 3 groups. However intraoperative blood pressures (systolic, diastolic as well as mean arterial pressures) and SPO2 showed significant difference amongst the groups (P<0.05). Time to first request of rescue analgesia was found to be more in group - Dpt than group – Div and group – Pb which was highly statistically significant (p <0.0001).There was statistical significant difference in number of diclofenac injections consumed during first 24 hours between group – Dpt & group – Div and highly significant difference between group – Dpt & group – Pb, group – Div & group – Pb. Conclusion: Peritonsillar infiltration of dexmedetomidine is better alternative to intravenous dexmedetomidine in tonsillar surgeries.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	6
title_short	A Comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy
url	https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v11i6.30639 https://doaj.org/article/a161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08 https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/30639 https://doaj.org/toc/2467-9100 https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0576
remote_bool	true
author2	Niteen. Khanderao Nandanvankar Meenakshi Sumadevi Pradeep Nazima Yusuf Memon Shridhar Devidas Yennawar
author2Str	Niteen. Khanderao Nandanvankar Meenakshi Sumadevi Pradeep Nazima Yusuf Memon Shridhar Devidas Yennawar
ppnlink	887837441
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
up_date	2024-07-03T17:57:24.187Z
_version_	1803581594469924864
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ045948399</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308101159.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ045948399</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJa161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Priya Vishwanath Lahane</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A Comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in population and post tonsillectomy pain affects analgesic consumption, hospital stay, oral intake and return to regular activity. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the study was to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods: This was a placebo-controlled study to compare peritonsillar infiltration and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Ninety patients were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients were divided in 3 groups on the basis of whether they received Peritonsillar dexmedetomidine, intravenous dexmedetomidine or intravenous normal saline. The groups were compared for post-operative pain, time to first request of rescue analgesia (duration of analgesia), post-operative sedation, analgesic requirement during first 24 hours and side effects. SSPS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis and p value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: Out of total 90 patients included in this study there was a female preponderance with a M: F ratio of 1:1.5. The mean age and ASA grades and mean duration of surgery of patients in all 3 groups were found to be comparable with no statistically significant difference in any of the groups (P<0.05). Preoperative mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures as well as mean arterial pressure and SPO2 was found to be comparable in all 3 groups. However intraoperative blood pressures (systolic, diastolic as well as mean arterial pressures) and SPO2 showed significant difference amongst the groups (P<0.05). Time to first request of rescue analgesia was found to be more in group - Dpt than group – Div and group – Pb which was highly statistically significant (p <0.0001).There was statistical significant difference in number of diclofenac injections consumed during first 24 hours between group – Dpt & group – Div and highly significant difference between group – Dpt & group – Pb, group – Div & group – Pb. Conclusion: Peritonsillar infiltration of dexmedetomidine is better alternative to intravenous dexmedetomidine in tonsillar surgeries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">tonsillar surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">dexmedetomidine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">analgesia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sedation hemodynamics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">spo2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Niteen. Khanderao Nandanvankar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meenakshi Sumadevi Pradeep</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nazima Yusuf Memon</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shridhar Devidas Yennawar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Asian Journal of Medical Sciences</subfield><subfield code="d">Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2020), 6, Seite 89-95</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)887837441</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2894889-0</subfield><subfield code="x">20910576</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:89-95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v11i6.30639</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/a161d61aa84e497ab80c10e8518bce08</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/30639</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2467-9100</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2091-0576</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">89-95</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4031916

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

A Comparative study of intraoperative peritonsillar infiltration versus intravenous dexemedetomidine for perioperative analgesia in tonsillectomy

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?