Modern authoritarian regime: characteristics and manifestations
The article examines the modern authoritarian regime, considers its characteristics and manifestations. The author gives an overview of modern authoritarian regimes. The purpose of this article is to determine the nature and features of the authoritarian regime, as a kind of political regime, as wel...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Oleksandr Skrypniuk [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Russisch ; Ukrainisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: ScienceRise: Juridical Science - PC Technology Center, 2019, (2020), 2 (12), Seite 18-23 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2020 ; number:2 (12) ; pages:18-23 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ048151106 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ048151106 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230308132950.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||rus c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ048151106 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJcd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a rus |a ukr | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Oleksandr Skrypniuk |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Modern authoritarian regime: characteristics and manifestations |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The article examines the modern authoritarian regime, considers its characteristics and manifestations. The author gives an overview of modern authoritarian regimes. The purpose of this article is to determine the nature and features of the authoritarian regime, as a kind of political regime, as well as the reasons that lead to its emergence or maintenance in the country. It is noted, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it is always a logical consequence of the socio-political processes taking place in the country. It is noted, that it appears against the background of breakthrough processes, when the political system of the state needs changes, but these changes occur under the influence of the political elite, not society, which in turn allows us to identify the preconditions for an authoritarian regime in the state. It is stated, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it does not provide high-quality succession of power, it is unable to offer new trends and transformations of public life due to the inability of one person to change their worldview, adapting to social demands and processes. It is noted, that most authoritarian countries do not proclaim, do not identify themselves in this way, but on the contrary try to position themselves as countries that promote democratic values. Authoritarian regime as such is not perceived by most countries in the world, as it is characterized by unstable, non-transparent and unpredictable development of socio-economic and socio-political processes. The dominance of liberal democracy in the tradition of economic relations demonstrates the tendency of socio-political preferences of most business elites to operate in the conditions of projected democratic regimes. It is concluded, that the authoritarian regime is based on the imperative planting of those values that will contribute to the maintenance of power, and therefore dominated by state ideology, which is planted by the forces and means of state propaganda. Citizens are deprived not only of real influence on the formation of state policy, but also of tools for supervision and control over the activities of the state apparatus | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a political regime | |
| 650 | 4 | |a authoritarianism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a authoritarian rule | |
| 650 | 4 | |a authoritarian system | |
| 650 | 4 | |a political elite | |
| 650 | 4 | |a political rights and freedoms | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Law | |
| 653 | 0 | |a K | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t ScienceRise: Juridical Science |d PC Technology Center, 2019 |g (2020), 2 (12), Seite 18-23 |w (DE-627)176063770X |x 25234153 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2020 |g number:2 (12) |g pages:18-23 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/cd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://journals.uran.ua/sr_law/article/view/210869 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4145 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4153 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2020 |e 2 (12) |h 18-23 | ||
| author_variant |
o s os |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:25234153:2020----::oenuhrtrargmcaatrsisn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869 doi (DE-627)DOAJ048151106 (DE-599)DOAJcd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus ukr Oleksandr Skrypniuk verfasserin aut Modern authoritarian regime: characteristics and manifestations 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article examines the modern authoritarian regime, considers its characteristics and manifestations. The author gives an overview of modern authoritarian regimes. The purpose of this article is to determine the nature and features of the authoritarian regime, as a kind of political regime, as well as the reasons that lead to its emergence or maintenance in the country. It is noted, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it is always a logical consequence of the socio-political processes taking place in the country. It is noted, that it appears against the background of breakthrough processes, when the political system of the state needs changes, but these changes occur under the influence of the political elite, not society, which in turn allows us to identify the preconditions for an authoritarian regime in the state. It is stated, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it does not provide high-quality succession of power, it is unable to offer new trends and transformations of public life due to the inability of one person to change their worldview, adapting to social demands and processes. It is noted, that most authoritarian countries do not proclaim, do not identify themselves in this way, but on the contrary try to position themselves as countries that promote democratic values. Authoritarian regime as such is not perceived by most countries in the world, as it is characterized by unstable, non-transparent and unpredictable development of socio-economic and socio-political processes. The dominance of liberal democracy in the tradition of economic relations demonstrates the tendency of socio-political preferences of most business elites to operate in the conditions of projected democratic regimes. It is concluded, that the authoritarian regime is based on the imperative planting of those values that will contribute to the maintenance of power, and therefore dominated by state ideology, which is planted by the forces and means of state propaganda. Citizens are deprived not only of real influence on the formation of state policy, but also of tools for supervision and control over the activities of the state apparatus political regime authoritarianism authoritarian rule authoritarian system political elite political rights and freedoms Law K In ScienceRise: Juridical Science PC Technology Center, 2019 (2020), 2 (12), Seite 18-23 (DE-627)176063770X 25234153 nnns year:2020 number:2 (12) pages:18-23 https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab kostenfrei http://journals.uran.ua/sr_law/article/view/210869 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4145 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4153 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2020 2 (12) 18-23 |
| spelling |
10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869 doi (DE-627)DOAJ048151106 (DE-599)DOAJcd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus ukr Oleksandr Skrypniuk verfasserin aut Modern authoritarian regime: characteristics and manifestations 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article examines the modern authoritarian regime, considers its characteristics and manifestations. The author gives an overview of modern authoritarian regimes. The purpose of this article is to determine the nature and features of the authoritarian regime, as a kind of political regime, as well as the reasons that lead to its emergence or maintenance in the country. It is noted, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it is always a logical consequence of the socio-political processes taking place in the country. It is noted, that it appears against the background of breakthrough processes, when the political system of the state needs changes, but these changes occur under the influence of the political elite, not society, which in turn allows us to identify the preconditions for an authoritarian regime in the state. It is stated, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it does not provide high-quality succession of power, it is unable to offer new trends and transformations of public life due to the inability of one person to change their worldview, adapting to social demands and processes. It is noted, that most authoritarian countries do not proclaim, do not identify themselves in this way, but on the contrary try to position themselves as countries that promote democratic values. Authoritarian regime as such is not perceived by most countries in the world, as it is characterized by unstable, non-transparent and unpredictable development of socio-economic and socio-political processes. The dominance of liberal democracy in the tradition of economic relations demonstrates the tendency of socio-political preferences of most business elites to operate in the conditions of projected democratic regimes. It is concluded, that the authoritarian regime is based on the imperative planting of those values that will contribute to the maintenance of power, and therefore dominated by state ideology, which is planted by the forces and means of state propaganda. Citizens are deprived not only of real influence on the formation of state policy, but also of tools for supervision and control over the activities of the state apparatus political regime authoritarianism authoritarian rule authoritarian system political elite political rights and freedoms Law K In ScienceRise: Juridical Science PC Technology Center, 2019 (2020), 2 (12), Seite 18-23 (DE-627)176063770X 25234153 nnns year:2020 number:2 (12) pages:18-23 https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab kostenfrei http://journals.uran.ua/sr_law/article/view/210869 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4145 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4153 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2020 2 (12) 18-23 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869 doi (DE-627)DOAJ048151106 (DE-599)DOAJcd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus ukr Oleksandr Skrypniuk verfasserin aut Modern authoritarian regime: characteristics and manifestations 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article examines the modern authoritarian regime, considers its characteristics and manifestations. The author gives an overview of modern authoritarian regimes. The purpose of this article is to determine the nature and features of the authoritarian regime, as a kind of political regime, as well as the reasons that lead to its emergence or maintenance in the country. It is noted, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it is always a logical consequence of the socio-political processes taking place in the country. It is noted, that it appears against the background of breakthrough processes, when the political system of the state needs changes, but these changes occur under the influence of the political elite, not society, which in turn allows us to identify the preconditions for an authoritarian regime in the state. It is stated, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it does not provide high-quality succession of power, it is unable to offer new trends and transformations of public life due to the inability of one person to change their worldview, adapting to social demands and processes. It is noted, that most authoritarian countries do not proclaim, do not identify themselves in this way, but on the contrary try to position themselves as countries that promote democratic values. Authoritarian regime as such is not perceived by most countries in the world, as it is characterized by unstable, non-transparent and unpredictable development of socio-economic and socio-political processes. The dominance of liberal democracy in the tradition of economic relations demonstrates the tendency of socio-political preferences of most business elites to operate in the conditions of projected democratic regimes. It is concluded, that the authoritarian regime is based on the imperative planting of those values that will contribute to the maintenance of power, and therefore dominated by state ideology, which is planted by the forces and means of state propaganda. Citizens are deprived not only of real influence on the formation of state policy, but also of tools for supervision and control over the activities of the state apparatus political regime authoritarianism authoritarian rule authoritarian system political elite political rights and freedoms Law K In ScienceRise: Juridical Science PC Technology Center, 2019 (2020), 2 (12), Seite 18-23 (DE-627)176063770X 25234153 nnns year:2020 number:2 (12) pages:18-23 https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab kostenfrei http://journals.uran.ua/sr_law/article/view/210869 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4145 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4153 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2020 2 (12) 18-23 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869 doi (DE-627)DOAJ048151106 (DE-599)DOAJcd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus ukr Oleksandr Skrypniuk verfasserin aut Modern authoritarian regime: characteristics and manifestations 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article examines the modern authoritarian regime, considers its characteristics and manifestations. The author gives an overview of modern authoritarian regimes. The purpose of this article is to determine the nature and features of the authoritarian regime, as a kind of political regime, as well as the reasons that lead to its emergence or maintenance in the country. It is noted, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it is always a logical consequence of the socio-political processes taking place in the country. It is noted, that it appears against the background of breakthrough processes, when the political system of the state needs changes, but these changes occur under the influence of the political elite, not society, which in turn allows us to identify the preconditions for an authoritarian regime in the state. It is stated, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it does not provide high-quality succession of power, it is unable to offer new trends and transformations of public life due to the inability of one person to change their worldview, adapting to social demands and processes. It is noted, that most authoritarian countries do not proclaim, do not identify themselves in this way, but on the contrary try to position themselves as countries that promote democratic values. Authoritarian regime as such is not perceived by most countries in the world, as it is characterized by unstable, non-transparent and unpredictable development of socio-economic and socio-political processes. The dominance of liberal democracy in the tradition of economic relations demonstrates the tendency of socio-political preferences of most business elites to operate in the conditions of projected democratic regimes. It is concluded, that the authoritarian regime is based on the imperative planting of those values that will contribute to the maintenance of power, and therefore dominated by state ideology, which is planted by the forces and means of state propaganda. Citizens are deprived not only of real influence on the formation of state policy, but also of tools for supervision and control over the activities of the state apparatus political regime authoritarianism authoritarian rule authoritarian system political elite political rights and freedoms Law K In ScienceRise: Juridical Science PC Technology Center, 2019 (2020), 2 (12), Seite 18-23 (DE-627)176063770X 25234153 nnns year:2020 number:2 (12) pages:18-23 https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab kostenfrei http://journals.uran.ua/sr_law/article/view/210869 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4145 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4153 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2020 2 (12) 18-23 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869 doi (DE-627)DOAJ048151106 (DE-599)DOAJcd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus ukr Oleksandr Skrypniuk verfasserin aut Modern authoritarian regime: characteristics and manifestations 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article examines the modern authoritarian regime, considers its characteristics and manifestations. The author gives an overview of modern authoritarian regimes. The purpose of this article is to determine the nature and features of the authoritarian regime, as a kind of political regime, as well as the reasons that lead to its emergence or maintenance in the country. It is noted, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it is always a logical consequence of the socio-political processes taking place in the country. It is noted, that it appears against the background of breakthrough processes, when the political system of the state needs changes, but these changes occur under the influence of the political elite, not society, which in turn allows us to identify the preconditions for an authoritarian regime in the state. It is stated, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it does not provide high-quality succession of power, it is unable to offer new trends and transformations of public life due to the inability of one person to change their worldview, adapting to social demands and processes. It is noted, that most authoritarian countries do not proclaim, do not identify themselves in this way, but on the contrary try to position themselves as countries that promote democratic values. Authoritarian regime as such is not perceived by most countries in the world, as it is characterized by unstable, non-transparent and unpredictable development of socio-economic and socio-political processes. The dominance of liberal democracy in the tradition of economic relations demonstrates the tendency of socio-political preferences of most business elites to operate in the conditions of projected democratic regimes. It is concluded, that the authoritarian regime is based on the imperative planting of those values that will contribute to the maintenance of power, and therefore dominated by state ideology, which is planted by the forces and means of state propaganda. Citizens are deprived not only of real influence on the formation of state policy, but also of tools for supervision and control over the activities of the state apparatus political regime authoritarianism authoritarian rule authoritarian system political elite political rights and freedoms Law K In ScienceRise: Juridical Science PC Technology Center, 2019 (2020), 2 (12), Seite 18-23 (DE-627)176063770X 25234153 nnns year:2020 number:2 (12) pages:18-23 https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab kostenfrei http://journals.uran.ua/sr_law/article/view/210869 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4145 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4153 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2020 2 (12) 18-23 |
| language |
Russian Ukrainian |
| source |
In ScienceRise: Juridical Science (2020), 2 (12), Seite 18-23 year:2020 number:2 (12) pages:18-23 |
| sourceStr |
In ScienceRise: Juridical Science (2020), 2 (12), Seite 18-23 year:2020 number:2 (12) pages:18-23 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
political regime authoritarianism authoritarian rule authoritarian system political elite political rights and freedoms Law K |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
ScienceRise: Juridical Science |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Oleksandr Skrypniuk @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
176063770X |
| id |
DOAJ048151106 |
| language_de |
russisch ukrainisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ048151106</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308132950.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||rus c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ048151106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJcd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rus</subfield><subfield code="a">ukr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oleksandr Skrypniuk</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Modern authoritarian regime: characteristics and manifestations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article examines the modern authoritarian regime, considers its characteristics and manifestations. The author gives an overview of modern authoritarian regimes. The purpose of this article is to determine the nature and features of the authoritarian regime, as a kind of political regime, as well as the reasons that lead to its emergence or maintenance in the country. It is noted, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it is always a logical consequence of the socio-political processes taking place in the country. It is noted, that it appears against the background of breakthrough processes, when the political system of the state needs changes, but these changes occur under the influence of the political elite, not society, which in turn allows us to identify the preconditions for an authoritarian regime in the state. It is stated, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it does not provide high-quality succession of power, it is unable to offer new trends and transformations of public life due to the inability of one person to change their worldview, adapting to social demands and processes. It is noted, that most authoritarian countries do not proclaim, do not identify themselves in this way, but on the contrary try to position themselves as countries that promote democratic values. Authoritarian regime as such is not perceived by most countries in the world, as it is characterized by unstable, non-transparent and unpredictable development of socio-economic and socio-political processes. The dominance of liberal democracy in the tradition of economic relations demonstrates the tendency of socio-political preferences of most business elites to operate in the conditions of projected democratic regimes. It is concluded, that the authoritarian regime is based on the imperative planting of those values that will contribute to the maintenance of power, and therefore dominated by state ideology, which is planted by the forces and means of state propaganda. Citizens are deprived not only of real influence on the formation of state policy, but also of tools for supervision and control over the activities of the state apparatus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">political regime</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">authoritarianism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">authoritarian rule</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">authoritarian system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">political elite</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">political rights and freedoms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">ScienceRise: Juridical Science</subfield><subfield code="d">PC Technology Center, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">(2020), 2 (12), Seite 18-23</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)176063770X</subfield><subfield code="x">25234153</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2 (12)</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:18-23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/cd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.uran.ua/sr_law/article/view/210869</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4145</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4153</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">2 (12)</subfield><subfield code="h">18-23</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Oleksandr Skrypniuk |
| spellingShingle |
Oleksandr Skrypniuk misc political regime misc authoritarianism misc authoritarian rule misc authoritarian system misc political elite misc political rights and freedoms misc Law misc K Modern authoritarian regime: characteristics and manifestations |
| authorStr |
Oleksandr Skrypniuk |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)176063770X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
25234153 |
| topic_title |
Modern authoritarian regime: characteristics and manifestations political regime authoritarianism authoritarian rule authoritarian system political elite political rights and freedoms |
| topic |
misc political regime misc authoritarianism misc authoritarian rule misc authoritarian system misc political elite misc political rights and freedoms misc Law misc K |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc political regime misc authoritarianism misc authoritarian rule misc authoritarian system misc political elite misc political rights and freedoms misc Law misc K |
| topic_browse |
misc political regime misc authoritarianism misc authoritarian rule misc authoritarian system misc political elite misc political rights and freedoms misc Law misc K |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
ScienceRise: Juridical Science |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
176063770X |
| hierarchy_top_title |
ScienceRise: Juridical Science |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)176063770X |
| title |
Modern authoritarian regime: characteristics and manifestations |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ048151106 (DE-599)DOAJcd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab |
| title_full |
Modern authoritarian regime: characteristics and manifestations |
| author_sort |
Oleksandr Skrypniuk |
| journal |
ScienceRise: Juridical Science |
| journalStr |
ScienceRise: Juridical Science |
| lang_code |
rus ukr |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
18 |
| author_browse |
Oleksandr Skrypniuk |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Oleksandr Skrypniuk |
| doi_str_mv |
10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869 |
| title_sort |
modern authoritarian regime: characteristics and manifestations |
| title_auth |
Modern authoritarian regime: characteristics and manifestations |
| abstract |
The article examines the modern authoritarian regime, considers its characteristics and manifestations. The author gives an overview of modern authoritarian regimes. The purpose of this article is to determine the nature and features of the authoritarian regime, as a kind of political regime, as well as the reasons that lead to its emergence or maintenance in the country. It is noted, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it is always a logical consequence of the socio-political processes taking place in the country. It is noted, that it appears against the background of breakthrough processes, when the political system of the state needs changes, but these changes occur under the influence of the political elite, not society, which in turn allows us to identify the preconditions for an authoritarian regime in the state. It is stated, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it does not provide high-quality succession of power, it is unable to offer new trends and transformations of public life due to the inability of one person to change their worldview, adapting to social demands and processes. It is noted, that most authoritarian countries do not proclaim, do not identify themselves in this way, but on the contrary try to position themselves as countries that promote democratic values. Authoritarian regime as such is not perceived by most countries in the world, as it is characterized by unstable, non-transparent and unpredictable development of socio-economic and socio-political processes. The dominance of liberal democracy in the tradition of economic relations demonstrates the tendency of socio-political preferences of most business elites to operate in the conditions of projected democratic regimes. It is concluded, that the authoritarian regime is based on the imperative planting of those values that will contribute to the maintenance of power, and therefore dominated by state ideology, which is planted by the forces and means of state propaganda. Citizens are deprived not only of real influence on the formation of state policy, but also of tools for supervision and control over the activities of the state apparatus |
| abstractGer |
The article examines the modern authoritarian regime, considers its characteristics and manifestations. The author gives an overview of modern authoritarian regimes. The purpose of this article is to determine the nature and features of the authoritarian regime, as a kind of political regime, as well as the reasons that lead to its emergence or maintenance in the country. It is noted, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it is always a logical consequence of the socio-political processes taking place in the country. It is noted, that it appears against the background of breakthrough processes, when the political system of the state needs changes, but these changes occur under the influence of the political elite, not society, which in turn allows us to identify the preconditions for an authoritarian regime in the state. It is stated, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it does not provide high-quality succession of power, it is unable to offer new trends and transformations of public life due to the inability of one person to change their worldview, adapting to social demands and processes. It is noted, that most authoritarian countries do not proclaim, do not identify themselves in this way, but on the contrary try to position themselves as countries that promote democratic values. Authoritarian regime as such is not perceived by most countries in the world, as it is characterized by unstable, non-transparent and unpredictable development of socio-economic and socio-political processes. The dominance of liberal democracy in the tradition of economic relations demonstrates the tendency of socio-political preferences of most business elites to operate in the conditions of projected democratic regimes. It is concluded, that the authoritarian regime is based on the imperative planting of those values that will contribute to the maintenance of power, and therefore dominated by state ideology, which is planted by the forces and means of state propaganda. Citizens are deprived not only of real influence on the formation of state policy, but also of tools for supervision and control over the activities of the state apparatus |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The article examines the modern authoritarian regime, considers its characteristics and manifestations. The author gives an overview of modern authoritarian regimes. The purpose of this article is to determine the nature and features of the authoritarian regime, as a kind of political regime, as well as the reasons that lead to its emergence or maintenance in the country. It is noted, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it is always a logical consequence of the socio-political processes taking place in the country. It is noted, that it appears against the background of breakthrough processes, when the political system of the state needs changes, but these changes occur under the influence of the political elite, not society, which in turn allows us to identify the preconditions for an authoritarian regime in the state. It is stated, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it does not provide high-quality succession of power, it is unable to offer new trends and transformations of public life due to the inability of one person to change their worldview, adapting to social demands and processes. It is noted, that most authoritarian countries do not proclaim, do not identify themselves in this way, but on the contrary try to position themselves as countries that promote democratic values. Authoritarian regime as such is not perceived by most countries in the world, as it is characterized by unstable, non-transparent and unpredictable development of socio-economic and socio-political processes. The dominance of liberal democracy in the tradition of economic relations demonstrates the tendency of socio-political preferences of most business elites to operate in the conditions of projected democratic regimes. It is concluded, that the authoritarian regime is based on the imperative planting of those values that will contribute to the maintenance of power, and therefore dominated by state ideology, which is planted by the forces and means of state propaganda. Citizens are deprived not only of real influence on the formation of state policy, but also of tools for supervision and control over the activities of the state apparatus |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
2 (12) |
| title_short |
Modern authoritarian regime: characteristics and manifestations |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869 https://doaj.org/article/cd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab http://journals.uran.ua/sr_law/article/view/210869 https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4145 https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4153 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
176063770X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T16:12:52.267Z |
| _version_ |
1803575017883041792 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ048151106</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308132950.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||rus c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ048151106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJcd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rus</subfield><subfield code="a">ukr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oleksandr Skrypniuk</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Modern authoritarian regime: characteristics and manifestations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article examines the modern authoritarian regime, considers its characteristics and manifestations. The author gives an overview of modern authoritarian regimes. The purpose of this article is to determine the nature and features of the authoritarian regime, as a kind of political regime, as well as the reasons that lead to its emergence or maintenance in the country. It is noted, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it is always a logical consequence of the socio-political processes taking place in the country. It is noted, that it appears against the background of breakthrough processes, when the political system of the state needs changes, but these changes occur under the influence of the political elite, not society, which in turn allows us to identify the preconditions for an authoritarian regime in the state. It is stated, that the authoritarian regime is not an evolutionary form of state development, it does not provide high-quality succession of power, it is unable to offer new trends and transformations of public life due to the inability of one person to change their worldview, adapting to social demands and processes. It is noted, that most authoritarian countries do not proclaim, do not identify themselves in this way, but on the contrary try to position themselves as countries that promote democratic values. Authoritarian regime as such is not perceived by most countries in the world, as it is characterized by unstable, non-transparent and unpredictable development of socio-economic and socio-political processes. The dominance of liberal democracy in the tradition of economic relations demonstrates the tendency of socio-political preferences of most business elites to operate in the conditions of projected democratic regimes. It is concluded, that the authoritarian regime is based on the imperative planting of those values that will contribute to the maintenance of power, and therefore dominated by state ideology, which is planted by the forces and means of state propaganda. Citizens are deprived not only of real influence on the formation of state policy, but also of tools for supervision and control over the activities of the state apparatus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">political regime</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">authoritarianism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">authoritarian rule</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">authoritarian system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">political elite</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">political rights and freedoms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">ScienceRise: Juridical Science</subfield><subfield code="d">PC Technology Center, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">(2020), 2 (12), Seite 18-23</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)176063770X</subfield><subfield code="x">25234153</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2 (12)</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:18-23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210869</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/cd13edaf099f4db0af83c46d3d3dafab</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.uran.ua/sr_law/article/view/210869</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4145</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4153</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">2 (12)</subfield><subfield code="h">18-23</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400321 |