The analysis of crack width in flexural concrete members reinforced with polymer composite bars
Introduction. Rebars, made of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP), have a number of distinguishing characteristics and disadvantages along with well-known strengths, such as high tensile strength, low specific density, high corrosion resistance, and low thermal conductivity. One of its principal strengt...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Ilshat T. Mirsayapov [verfasserIn] Igor A. Antakov [verfasserIn] Alexey B. Antakov [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch ; Russisch |
Erschienen: |
2020 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Vestnik MGSU - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013, 15(2020), 12, Seite 1663-1672 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:15 ; year:2020 ; number:12 ; pages:1663-1672 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ050437739 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ050437739 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230308152914.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ050437739 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng |a rus | ||
050 | 0 | |a NA1-9428 | |
050 | 0 | |a HD9715-9717.5 | |
100 | 0 | |a Ilshat T. Mirsayapov |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The analysis of crack width in flexural concrete members reinforced with polymer composite bars |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Introduction. Rebars, made of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP), have a number of distinguishing characteristics and disadvantages along with well-known strengths, such as high tensile strength, low specific density, high corrosion resistance, and low thermal conductivity. One of its principal strengths is the modulus of elasticity which is relatively low compared to steel. As a result, elements, having FRP reinforcement, feature higher deformability. In this regard, the requirements of serviceabi-lity limit states, applicable to structures, may become the main obstacle to the use of FRP as the reinforcement for concrete members. It is assumed that cracking patterns of members, having FRP reinforcement, may differ from those of traditional reinforced concrete structures. Materials and methods. Experimental studies were carried with regard for and in compliance with the provisions of National State Standard 8829-94. Tested samples represented concrete beams that were 1,810 mm long and had a cross section of 120 × 220 mm. Their tensile side was reinforced with two bars. Steel, glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars were used to reinforce the beams. The value of the reinforcement ratio varied. Crack width calculation methods, applied according to Construction rules and regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017 (Russia) and ACI 440.1R-06 (USA) were analyzed. Results. The results of the theoretical and experimental studies of the crack resistance of flexural members having FRP reinforcement are obtained. Discrepancies between the calculation methods are identified. Conclusions. Сracking patterns, typical for members having FRP reinforcement, are specified. They contest the applicabi-lity of methods, prescribed in the Construction Rules and Regulations. The methods, prescribed by Construction Rules and Regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017, differ in respect of crack width calculations, and it leads to diverging calculation results. | ||
650 | 4 | |a non-metallic reinforcement | |
650 | 4 | |a fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement | |
650 | 4 | |a concrete structures | |
650 | 4 | |a flexural members | |
650 | 4 | |a crack width | |
650 | 4 | |a concrete beam | |
650 | 4 | |a glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement | |
650 | 4 | |a basalt fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement | |
653 | 0 | |a Architecture | |
653 | 0 | |a Construction industry | |
700 | 0 | |a Igor A. Antakov |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Alexey B. Antakov |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Vestnik MGSU |d Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013 |g 15(2020), 12, Seite 1663-1672 |w (DE-627)792409914 |w (DE-600)2781261-3 |x 23046600 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:15 |g year:2020 |g number:12 |g pages:1663-1672 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4392 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 15 |j 2020 |e 12 |h 1663-1672 |
author_variant |
i t m itm i a a iaa a b a aba |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:23046600:2020----::haayiocakitifeuacnrtmmesenocdi |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
callnumber-subject-code |
NA |
publishDate |
2020 |
allfields |
10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 doi (DE-627)DOAJ050437739 (DE-599)DOAJ32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus NA1-9428 HD9715-9717.5 Ilshat T. Mirsayapov verfasserin aut The analysis of crack width in flexural concrete members reinforced with polymer composite bars 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction. Rebars, made of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP), have a number of distinguishing characteristics and disadvantages along with well-known strengths, such as high tensile strength, low specific density, high corrosion resistance, and low thermal conductivity. One of its principal strengths is the modulus of elasticity which is relatively low compared to steel. As a result, elements, having FRP reinforcement, feature higher deformability. In this regard, the requirements of serviceabi-lity limit states, applicable to structures, may become the main obstacle to the use of FRP as the reinforcement for concrete members. It is assumed that cracking patterns of members, having FRP reinforcement, may differ from those of traditional reinforced concrete structures. Materials and methods. Experimental studies were carried with regard for and in compliance with the provisions of National State Standard 8829-94. Tested samples represented concrete beams that were 1,810 mm long and had a cross section of 120 × 220 mm. Their tensile side was reinforced with two bars. Steel, glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars were used to reinforce the beams. The value of the reinforcement ratio varied. Crack width calculation methods, applied according to Construction rules and regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017 (Russia) and ACI 440.1R-06 (USA) were analyzed. Results. The results of the theoretical and experimental studies of the crack resistance of flexural members having FRP reinforcement are obtained. Discrepancies between the calculation methods are identified. Conclusions. Сracking patterns, typical for members having FRP reinforcement, are specified. They contest the applicabi-lity of methods, prescribed in the Construction Rules and Regulations. The methods, prescribed by Construction Rules and Regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017, differ in respect of crack width calculations, and it leads to diverging calculation results. non-metallic reinforcement fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement concrete structures flexural members crack width concrete beam glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement basalt fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement Architecture Construction industry Igor A. Antakov verfasserin aut Alexey B. Antakov verfasserin aut In Vestnik MGSU Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013 15(2020), 12, Seite 1663-1672 (DE-627)792409914 (DE-600)2781261-3 23046600 nnns volume:15 year:2020 number:12 pages:1663-1672 https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2020 12 1663-1672 |
spelling |
10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 doi (DE-627)DOAJ050437739 (DE-599)DOAJ32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus NA1-9428 HD9715-9717.5 Ilshat T. Mirsayapov verfasserin aut The analysis of crack width in flexural concrete members reinforced with polymer composite bars 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction. Rebars, made of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP), have a number of distinguishing characteristics and disadvantages along with well-known strengths, such as high tensile strength, low specific density, high corrosion resistance, and low thermal conductivity. One of its principal strengths is the modulus of elasticity which is relatively low compared to steel. As a result, elements, having FRP reinforcement, feature higher deformability. In this regard, the requirements of serviceabi-lity limit states, applicable to structures, may become the main obstacle to the use of FRP as the reinforcement for concrete members. It is assumed that cracking patterns of members, having FRP reinforcement, may differ from those of traditional reinforced concrete structures. Materials and methods. Experimental studies were carried with regard for and in compliance with the provisions of National State Standard 8829-94. Tested samples represented concrete beams that were 1,810 mm long and had a cross section of 120 × 220 mm. Their tensile side was reinforced with two bars. Steel, glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars were used to reinforce the beams. The value of the reinforcement ratio varied. Crack width calculation methods, applied according to Construction rules and regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017 (Russia) and ACI 440.1R-06 (USA) were analyzed. Results. The results of the theoretical and experimental studies of the crack resistance of flexural members having FRP reinforcement are obtained. Discrepancies between the calculation methods are identified. Conclusions. Сracking patterns, typical for members having FRP reinforcement, are specified. They contest the applicabi-lity of methods, prescribed in the Construction Rules and Regulations. The methods, prescribed by Construction Rules and Regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017, differ in respect of crack width calculations, and it leads to diverging calculation results. non-metallic reinforcement fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement concrete structures flexural members crack width concrete beam glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement basalt fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement Architecture Construction industry Igor A. Antakov verfasserin aut Alexey B. Antakov verfasserin aut In Vestnik MGSU Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013 15(2020), 12, Seite 1663-1672 (DE-627)792409914 (DE-600)2781261-3 23046600 nnns volume:15 year:2020 number:12 pages:1663-1672 https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2020 12 1663-1672 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 doi (DE-627)DOAJ050437739 (DE-599)DOAJ32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus NA1-9428 HD9715-9717.5 Ilshat T. Mirsayapov verfasserin aut The analysis of crack width in flexural concrete members reinforced with polymer composite bars 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction. Rebars, made of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP), have a number of distinguishing characteristics and disadvantages along with well-known strengths, such as high tensile strength, low specific density, high corrosion resistance, and low thermal conductivity. One of its principal strengths is the modulus of elasticity which is relatively low compared to steel. As a result, elements, having FRP reinforcement, feature higher deformability. In this regard, the requirements of serviceabi-lity limit states, applicable to structures, may become the main obstacle to the use of FRP as the reinforcement for concrete members. It is assumed that cracking patterns of members, having FRP reinforcement, may differ from those of traditional reinforced concrete structures. Materials and methods. Experimental studies were carried with regard for and in compliance with the provisions of National State Standard 8829-94. Tested samples represented concrete beams that were 1,810 mm long and had a cross section of 120 × 220 mm. Their tensile side was reinforced with two bars. Steel, glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars were used to reinforce the beams. The value of the reinforcement ratio varied. Crack width calculation methods, applied according to Construction rules and regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017 (Russia) and ACI 440.1R-06 (USA) were analyzed. Results. The results of the theoretical and experimental studies of the crack resistance of flexural members having FRP reinforcement are obtained. Discrepancies between the calculation methods are identified. Conclusions. Сracking patterns, typical for members having FRP reinforcement, are specified. They contest the applicabi-lity of methods, prescribed in the Construction Rules and Regulations. The methods, prescribed by Construction Rules and Regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017, differ in respect of crack width calculations, and it leads to diverging calculation results. non-metallic reinforcement fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement concrete structures flexural members crack width concrete beam glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement basalt fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement Architecture Construction industry Igor A. Antakov verfasserin aut Alexey B. Antakov verfasserin aut In Vestnik MGSU Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013 15(2020), 12, Seite 1663-1672 (DE-627)792409914 (DE-600)2781261-3 23046600 nnns volume:15 year:2020 number:12 pages:1663-1672 https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2020 12 1663-1672 |
allfieldsGer |
10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 doi (DE-627)DOAJ050437739 (DE-599)DOAJ32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus NA1-9428 HD9715-9717.5 Ilshat T. Mirsayapov verfasserin aut The analysis of crack width in flexural concrete members reinforced with polymer composite bars 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction. Rebars, made of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP), have a number of distinguishing characteristics and disadvantages along with well-known strengths, such as high tensile strength, low specific density, high corrosion resistance, and low thermal conductivity. One of its principal strengths is the modulus of elasticity which is relatively low compared to steel. As a result, elements, having FRP reinforcement, feature higher deformability. In this regard, the requirements of serviceabi-lity limit states, applicable to structures, may become the main obstacle to the use of FRP as the reinforcement for concrete members. It is assumed that cracking patterns of members, having FRP reinforcement, may differ from those of traditional reinforced concrete structures. Materials and methods. Experimental studies were carried with regard for and in compliance with the provisions of National State Standard 8829-94. Tested samples represented concrete beams that were 1,810 mm long and had a cross section of 120 × 220 mm. Their tensile side was reinforced with two bars. Steel, glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars were used to reinforce the beams. The value of the reinforcement ratio varied. Crack width calculation methods, applied according to Construction rules and regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017 (Russia) and ACI 440.1R-06 (USA) were analyzed. Results. The results of the theoretical and experimental studies of the crack resistance of flexural members having FRP reinforcement are obtained. Discrepancies between the calculation methods are identified. Conclusions. Сracking patterns, typical for members having FRP reinforcement, are specified. They contest the applicabi-lity of methods, prescribed in the Construction Rules and Regulations. The methods, prescribed by Construction Rules and Regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017, differ in respect of crack width calculations, and it leads to diverging calculation results. non-metallic reinforcement fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement concrete structures flexural members crack width concrete beam glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement basalt fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement Architecture Construction industry Igor A. Antakov verfasserin aut Alexey B. Antakov verfasserin aut In Vestnik MGSU Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013 15(2020), 12, Seite 1663-1672 (DE-627)792409914 (DE-600)2781261-3 23046600 nnns volume:15 year:2020 number:12 pages:1663-1672 https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2020 12 1663-1672 |
allfieldsSound |
10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 doi (DE-627)DOAJ050437739 (DE-599)DOAJ32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus NA1-9428 HD9715-9717.5 Ilshat T. Mirsayapov verfasserin aut The analysis of crack width in flexural concrete members reinforced with polymer composite bars 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction. Rebars, made of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP), have a number of distinguishing characteristics and disadvantages along with well-known strengths, such as high tensile strength, low specific density, high corrosion resistance, and low thermal conductivity. One of its principal strengths is the modulus of elasticity which is relatively low compared to steel. As a result, elements, having FRP reinforcement, feature higher deformability. In this regard, the requirements of serviceabi-lity limit states, applicable to structures, may become the main obstacle to the use of FRP as the reinforcement for concrete members. It is assumed that cracking patterns of members, having FRP reinforcement, may differ from those of traditional reinforced concrete structures. Materials and methods. Experimental studies were carried with regard for and in compliance with the provisions of National State Standard 8829-94. Tested samples represented concrete beams that were 1,810 mm long and had a cross section of 120 × 220 mm. Their tensile side was reinforced with two bars. Steel, glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars were used to reinforce the beams. The value of the reinforcement ratio varied. Crack width calculation methods, applied according to Construction rules and regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017 (Russia) and ACI 440.1R-06 (USA) were analyzed. Results. The results of the theoretical and experimental studies of the crack resistance of flexural members having FRP reinforcement are obtained. Discrepancies between the calculation methods are identified. Conclusions. Сracking patterns, typical for members having FRP reinforcement, are specified. They contest the applicabi-lity of methods, prescribed in the Construction Rules and Regulations. The methods, prescribed by Construction Rules and Regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017, differ in respect of crack width calculations, and it leads to diverging calculation results. non-metallic reinforcement fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement concrete structures flexural members crack width concrete beam glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement basalt fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement Architecture Construction industry Igor A. Antakov verfasserin aut Alexey B. Antakov verfasserin aut In Vestnik MGSU Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013 15(2020), 12, Seite 1663-1672 (DE-627)792409914 (DE-600)2781261-3 23046600 nnns volume:15 year:2020 number:12 pages:1663-1672 https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2020 12 1663-1672 |
language |
English Russian |
source |
In Vestnik MGSU 15(2020), 12, Seite 1663-1672 volume:15 year:2020 number:12 pages:1663-1672 |
sourceStr |
In Vestnik MGSU 15(2020), 12, Seite 1663-1672 volume:15 year:2020 number:12 pages:1663-1672 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
non-metallic reinforcement fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement concrete structures flexural members crack width concrete beam glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement basalt fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement Architecture Construction industry |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Vestnik MGSU |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ilshat T. Mirsayapov @@aut@@ Igor A. Antakov @@aut@@ Alexey B. Antakov @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
792409914 |
id |
DOAJ050437739 |
language_de |
englisch russisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ050437739</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308152914.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ050437739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">NA1-9428</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HD9715-9717.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ilshat T. Mirsayapov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The analysis of crack width in flexural concrete members reinforced with polymer composite bars</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction. Rebars, made of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP), have a number of distinguishing characteristics and disadvantages along with well-known strengths, such as high tensile strength, low specific density, high corrosion resistance, and low thermal conductivity. One of its principal strengths is the modulus of elasticity which is relatively low compared to steel. As a result, elements, having FRP reinforcement, feature higher deformability. In this regard, the requirements of serviceabi-lity limit states, applicable to structures, may become the main obstacle to the use of FRP as the reinforcement for concrete members. It is assumed that cracking patterns of members, having FRP reinforcement, may differ from those of traditional reinforced concrete structures. Materials and methods. Experimental studies were carried with regard for and in compliance with the provisions of National State Standard 8829-94. Tested samples represented concrete beams that were 1,810 mm long and had a cross section of 120 × 220 mm. Their tensile side was reinforced with two bars. Steel, glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars were used to reinforce the beams. The value of the reinforcement ratio varied. Crack width calculation methods, applied according to Construction rules and regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017 (Russia) and ACI 440.1R-06 (USA) were analyzed. Results. The results of the theoretical and experimental studies of the crack resistance of flexural members having FRP reinforcement are obtained. Discrepancies between the calculation methods are identified. Conclusions. Сracking patterns, typical for members having FRP reinforcement, are specified. They contest the applicabi-lity of methods, prescribed in the Construction Rules and Regulations. The methods, prescribed by Construction Rules and Regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017, differ in respect of crack width calculations, and it leads to diverging calculation results.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">non-metallic reinforcement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">concrete structures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">flexural members</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">crack width</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">concrete beam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">basalt fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Architecture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Construction industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Igor A. Antakov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alexey B. Antakov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Vestnik MGSU</subfield><subfield code="d">Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">15(2020), 12, Seite 1663-1672</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)792409914</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2781261-3</subfield><subfield code="x">23046600</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1663-1672</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">12</subfield><subfield code="h">1663-1672</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
N - Fine Arts |
author |
Ilshat T. Mirsayapov |
spellingShingle |
Ilshat T. Mirsayapov misc NA1-9428 misc HD9715-9717.5 misc non-metallic reinforcement misc fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement misc concrete structures misc flexural members misc crack width misc concrete beam misc glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement misc basalt fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement misc Architecture misc Construction industry The analysis of crack width in flexural concrete members reinforced with polymer composite bars |
authorStr |
Ilshat T. Mirsayapov |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)792409914 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
NA1-9428 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
23046600 |
topic_title |
NA1-9428 HD9715-9717.5 The analysis of crack width in flexural concrete members reinforced with polymer composite bars non-metallic reinforcement fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement concrete structures flexural members crack width concrete beam glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement basalt fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement |
topic |
misc NA1-9428 misc HD9715-9717.5 misc non-metallic reinforcement misc fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement misc concrete structures misc flexural members misc crack width misc concrete beam misc glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement misc basalt fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement misc Architecture misc Construction industry |
topic_unstemmed |
misc NA1-9428 misc HD9715-9717.5 misc non-metallic reinforcement misc fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement misc concrete structures misc flexural members misc crack width misc concrete beam misc glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement misc basalt fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement misc Architecture misc Construction industry |
topic_browse |
misc NA1-9428 misc HD9715-9717.5 misc non-metallic reinforcement misc fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement misc concrete structures misc flexural members misc crack width misc concrete beam misc glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement misc basalt fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement misc Architecture misc Construction industry |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Vestnik MGSU |
hierarchy_parent_id |
792409914 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Vestnik MGSU |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)792409914 (DE-600)2781261-3 |
title |
The analysis of crack width in flexural concrete members reinforced with polymer composite bars |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ050437739 (DE-599)DOAJ32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966 |
title_full |
The analysis of crack width in flexural concrete members reinforced with polymer composite bars |
author_sort |
Ilshat T. Mirsayapov |
journal |
Vestnik MGSU |
journalStr |
Vestnik MGSU |
callnumber-first-code |
N |
lang_code |
eng rus |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2020 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
1663 |
author_browse |
Ilshat T. Mirsayapov Igor A. Antakov Alexey B. Antakov |
container_volume |
15 |
class |
NA1-9428 HD9715-9717.5 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Ilshat T. Mirsayapov |
doi_str_mv |
10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
analysis of crack width in flexural concrete members reinforced with polymer composite bars |
callnumber |
NA1-9428 |
title_auth |
The analysis of crack width in flexural concrete members reinforced with polymer composite bars |
abstract |
Introduction. Rebars, made of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP), have a number of distinguishing characteristics and disadvantages along with well-known strengths, such as high tensile strength, low specific density, high corrosion resistance, and low thermal conductivity. One of its principal strengths is the modulus of elasticity which is relatively low compared to steel. As a result, elements, having FRP reinforcement, feature higher deformability. In this regard, the requirements of serviceabi-lity limit states, applicable to structures, may become the main obstacle to the use of FRP as the reinforcement for concrete members. It is assumed that cracking patterns of members, having FRP reinforcement, may differ from those of traditional reinforced concrete structures. Materials and methods. Experimental studies were carried with regard for and in compliance with the provisions of National State Standard 8829-94. Tested samples represented concrete beams that were 1,810 mm long and had a cross section of 120 × 220 mm. Their tensile side was reinforced with two bars. Steel, glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars were used to reinforce the beams. The value of the reinforcement ratio varied. Crack width calculation methods, applied according to Construction rules and regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017 (Russia) and ACI 440.1R-06 (USA) were analyzed. Results. The results of the theoretical and experimental studies of the crack resistance of flexural members having FRP reinforcement are obtained. Discrepancies between the calculation methods are identified. Conclusions. Сracking patterns, typical for members having FRP reinforcement, are specified. They contest the applicabi-lity of methods, prescribed in the Construction Rules and Regulations. The methods, prescribed by Construction Rules and Regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017, differ in respect of crack width calculations, and it leads to diverging calculation results. |
abstractGer |
Introduction. Rebars, made of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP), have a number of distinguishing characteristics and disadvantages along with well-known strengths, such as high tensile strength, low specific density, high corrosion resistance, and low thermal conductivity. One of its principal strengths is the modulus of elasticity which is relatively low compared to steel. As a result, elements, having FRP reinforcement, feature higher deformability. In this regard, the requirements of serviceabi-lity limit states, applicable to structures, may become the main obstacle to the use of FRP as the reinforcement for concrete members. It is assumed that cracking patterns of members, having FRP reinforcement, may differ from those of traditional reinforced concrete structures. Materials and methods. Experimental studies were carried with regard for and in compliance with the provisions of National State Standard 8829-94. Tested samples represented concrete beams that were 1,810 mm long and had a cross section of 120 × 220 mm. Their tensile side was reinforced with two bars. Steel, glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars were used to reinforce the beams. The value of the reinforcement ratio varied. Crack width calculation methods, applied according to Construction rules and regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017 (Russia) and ACI 440.1R-06 (USA) were analyzed. Results. The results of the theoretical and experimental studies of the crack resistance of flexural members having FRP reinforcement are obtained. Discrepancies between the calculation methods are identified. Conclusions. Сracking patterns, typical for members having FRP reinforcement, are specified. They contest the applicabi-lity of methods, prescribed in the Construction Rules and Regulations. The methods, prescribed by Construction Rules and Regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017, differ in respect of crack width calculations, and it leads to diverging calculation results. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Introduction. Rebars, made of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP), have a number of distinguishing characteristics and disadvantages along with well-known strengths, such as high tensile strength, low specific density, high corrosion resistance, and low thermal conductivity. One of its principal strengths is the modulus of elasticity which is relatively low compared to steel. As a result, elements, having FRP reinforcement, feature higher deformability. In this regard, the requirements of serviceabi-lity limit states, applicable to structures, may become the main obstacle to the use of FRP as the reinforcement for concrete members. It is assumed that cracking patterns of members, having FRP reinforcement, may differ from those of traditional reinforced concrete structures. Materials and methods. Experimental studies were carried with regard for and in compliance with the provisions of National State Standard 8829-94. Tested samples represented concrete beams that were 1,810 mm long and had a cross section of 120 × 220 mm. Their tensile side was reinforced with two bars. Steel, glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars were used to reinforce the beams. The value of the reinforcement ratio varied. Crack width calculation methods, applied according to Construction rules and regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017 (Russia) and ACI 440.1R-06 (USA) were analyzed. Results. The results of the theoretical and experimental studies of the crack resistance of flexural members having FRP reinforcement are obtained. Discrepancies between the calculation methods are identified. Conclusions. Сracking patterns, typical for members having FRP reinforcement, are specified. They contest the applicabi-lity of methods, prescribed in the Construction Rules and Regulations. The methods, prescribed by Construction Rules and Regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017, differ in respect of crack width calculations, and it leads to diverging calculation results. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
12 |
title_short |
The analysis of crack width in flexural concrete members reinforced with polymer composite bars |
url |
https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 https://doaj.org/article/32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966 https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Igor A. Antakov Alexey B. Antakov |
author2Str |
Igor A. Antakov Alexey B. Antakov |
ppnlink |
792409914 |
callnumber-subject |
NA - Architecture |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672 |
callnumber-a |
NA1-9428 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T14:50:55.973Z |
_version_ |
1803569862777241600 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ050437739</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308152914.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ050437739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">NA1-9428</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HD9715-9717.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ilshat T. Mirsayapov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The analysis of crack width in flexural concrete members reinforced with polymer composite bars</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction. Rebars, made of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP), have a number of distinguishing characteristics and disadvantages along with well-known strengths, such as high tensile strength, low specific density, high corrosion resistance, and low thermal conductivity. One of its principal strengths is the modulus of elasticity which is relatively low compared to steel. As a result, elements, having FRP reinforcement, feature higher deformability. In this regard, the requirements of serviceabi-lity limit states, applicable to structures, may become the main obstacle to the use of FRP as the reinforcement for concrete members. It is assumed that cracking patterns of members, having FRP reinforcement, may differ from those of traditional reinforced concrete structures. Materials and methods. Experimental studies were carried with regard for and in compliance with the provisions of National State Standard 8829-94. Tested samples represented concrete beams that were 1,810 mm long and had a cross section of 120 × 220 mm. Their tensile side was reinforced with two bars. Steel, glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars were used to reinforce the beams. The value of the reinforcement ratio varied. Crack width calculation methods, applied according to Construction rules and regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017 (Russia) and ACI 440.1R-06 (USA) were analyzed. Results. The results of the theoretical and experimental studies of the crack resistance of flexural members having FRP reinforcement are obtained. Discrepancies between the calculation methods are identified. Conclusions. Сracking patterns, typical for members having FRP reinforcement, are specified. They contest the applicabi-lity of methods, prescribed in the Construction Rules and Regulations. The methods, prescribed by Construction Rules and Regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017, differ in respect of crack width calculations, and it leads to diverging calculation results.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">non-metallic reinforcement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">concrete structures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">flexural members</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">crack width</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">concrete beam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">basalt fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Architecture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Construction industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Igor A. Antakov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alexey B. Antakov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Vestnik MGSU</subfield><subfield code="d">Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">15(2020), 12, Seite 1663-1672</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)792409914</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2781261-3</subfield><subfield code="x">23046600</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1663-1672</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/32b6f7827f8e4cc39ee5a40e64f18966</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1663-1672</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">12</subfield><subfield code="h">1663-1672</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4002705 |