Costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes
<p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<The evolutionary dynamics of xenobiotic resistance depends on how resistance mutations influence the fitness of their bearers, both in the presence and absence of xenobiotic selection pressure. In cases of multiple resistance, these...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Weill Mylène [verfasserIn] Agnew Philip [verfasserIn] Duchon Stéphane [verfasserIn] Bonnet Julien [verfasserIn] Berticat Claire [verfasserIn] Corbel Vincent [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2008 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: BMC Evolutionary Biology - BMC, 2003, 8(2008), 1, p 104 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:8 ; year:2008 ; number:1, p 104 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1186/1471-2148-8-104 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ050738844 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ050738844 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230308154703.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230227s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/1471-2148-8-104 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ050738844 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJd5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a QH359-425 | |
100 | 0 | |a Weill Mylène |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes |
264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a <p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<The evolutionary dynamics of xenobiotic resistance depends on how resistance mutations influence the fitness of their bearers, both in the presence and absence of xenobiotic selection pressure. In cases of multiple resistance, these dynamics will also depend on how individual resistance mutations interact with one another, and on the xenobiotics applied against them. We compared <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes harbouring two resistance alleles <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<and <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<(conferring resistance to carbamate and pyrethroid insecticides, respectively) to mosquitoes bearing only one of the alleles, or neither allele. Comparisons were made in environments where both, only one, or neither type of insecticide was present.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<Each resistance allele was associated with fitness costs (survival to adulthood) in an insecticide-free environment, with the costs of <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<being greater than for <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R</it<</sup<. However, there was a notable interaction in that the costs of harbouring both alleles were significantly less than for harbouring <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<alone. The two insecticides combined in an additive, synergistic and antagonistic manner depending on a mosquito's resistance status, but were not predictable based on the presence/absence of either, or both mutations.</p< <p<Conclusion</p< <p<Insecticide resistance mutations interacted to positively or negatively influence a mosquito's fitness, both in the presence or absence of insecticides. In particular, the presence of the <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation compensated for the costs of the <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation in an insecticide-free environment, suggesting the strength of selection in untreated areas would be less against mosquitoes resistant to both insecticides than for those resistant to carbamates alone. Additional interactions suggest the dynamics of resistance will be difficult to predict in populations where multiple resistance mutations are present or that are subject to treatment by different xenobiotics.</p< | ||
653 | 0 | |a Evolution | |
700 | 0 | |a Agnew Philip |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Duchon Stéphane |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Bonnet Julien |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Berticat Claire |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Corbel Vincent |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t BMC Evolutionary Biology |d BMC, 2003 |g 8(2008), 1, p 104 |w (DE-627)32664489X |w (DE-600)2041493-6 |x 14712148 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2008 |g number:1, p 104 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-104 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/d5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/104 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2148 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2057 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 8 |j 2008 |e 1, p 104 |
author_variant |
w m wm a p ap d s ds b j bj b c bc c v cv |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:14712148:2008----::otadeeisfutpeeitneonetcdsoiclxunu |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2008 |
callnumber-subject-code |
QH |
publishDate |
2008 |
allfields |
10.1186/1471-2148-8-104 doi (DE-627)DOAJ050738844 (DE-599)DOAJd5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH359-425 Weill Mylène verfasserin aut Costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes 2008 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<The evolutionary dynamics of xenobiotic resistance depends on how resistance mutations influence the fitness of their bearers, both in the presence and absence of xenobiotic selection pressure. In cases of multiple resistance, these dynamics will also depend on how individual resistance mutations interact with one another, and on the xenobiotics applied against them. We compared <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes harbouring two resistance alleles <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<and <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<(conferring resistance to carbamate and pyrethroid insecticides, respectively) to mosquitoes bearing only one of the alleles, or neither allele. Comparisons were made in environments where both, only one, or neither type of insecticide was present.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<Each resistance allele was associated with fitness costs (survival to adulthood) in an insecticide-free environment, with the costs of <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<being greater than for <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R</it<</sup<. However, there was a notable interaction in that the costs of harbouring both alleles were significantly less than for harbouring <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<alone. The two insecticides combined in an additive, synergistic and antagonistic manner depending on a mosquito's resistance status, but were not predictable based on the presence/absence of either, or both mutations.</p< <p<Conclusion</p< <p<Insecticide resistance mutations interacted to positively or negatively influence a mosquito's fitness, both in the presence or absence of insecticides. In particular, the presence of the <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation compensated for the costs of the <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation in an insecticide-free environment, suggesting the strength of selection in untreated areas would be less against mosquitoes resistant to both insecticides than for those resistant to carbamates alone. Additional interactions suggest the dynamics of resistance will be difficult to predict in populations where multiple resistance mutations are present or that are subject to treatment by different xenobiotics.</p< Evolution Agnew Philip verfasserin aut Duchon Stéphane verfasserin aut Bonnet Julien verfasserin aut Berticat Claire verfasserin aut Corbel Vincent verfasserin aut In BMC Evolutionary Biology BMC, 2003 8(2008), 1, p 104 (DE-627)32664489X (DE-600)2041493-6 14712148 nnns volume:8 year:2008 number:1, p 104 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-104 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda kostenfrei http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/104 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2148 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2008 1, p 104 |
spelling |
10.1186/1471-2148-8-104 doi (DE-627)DOAJ050738844 (DE-599)DOAJd5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH359-425 Weill Mylène verfasserin aut Costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes 2008 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<The evolutionary dynamics of xenobiotic resistance depends on how resistance mutations influence the fitness of their bearers, both in the presence and absence of xenobiotic selection pressure. In cases of multiple resistance, these dynamics will also depend on how individual resistance mutations interact with one another, and on the xenobiotics applied against them. We compared <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes harbouring two resistance alleles <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<and <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<(conferring resistance to carbamate and pyrethroid insecticides, respectively) to mosquitoes bearing only one of the alleles, or neither allele. Comparisons were made in environments where both, only one, or neither type of insecticide was present.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<Each resistance allele was associated with fitness costs (survival to adulthood) in an insecticide-free environment, with the costs of <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<being greater than for <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R</it<</sup<. However, there was a notable interaction in that the costs of harbouring both alleles were significantly less than for harbouring <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<alone. The two insecticides combined in an additive, synergistic and antagonistic manner depending on a mosquito's resistance status, but were not predictable based on the presence/absence of either, or both mutations.</p< <p<Conclusion</p< <p<Insecticide resistance mutations interacted to positively or negatively influence a mosquito's fitness, both in the presence or absence of insecticides. In particular, the presence of the <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation compensated for the costs of the <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation in an insecticide-free environment, suggesting the strength of selection in untreated areas would be less against mosquitoes resistant to both insecticides than for those resistant to carbamates alone. Additional interactions suggest the dynamics of resistance will be difficult to predict in populations where multiple resistance mutations are present or that are subject to treatment by different xenobiotics.</p< Evolution Agnew Philip verfasserin aut Duchon Stéphane verfasserin aut Bonnet Julien verfasserin aut Berticat Claire verfasserin aut Corbel Vincent verfasserin aut In BMC Evolutionary Biology BMC, 2003 8(2008), 1, p 104 (DE-627)32664489X (DE-600)2041493-6 14712148 nnns volume:8 year:2008 number:1, p 104 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-104 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda kostenfrei http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/104 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2148 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2008 1, p 104 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1186/1471-2148-8-104 doi (DE-627)DOAJ050738844 (DE-599)DOAJd5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH359-425 Weill Mylène verfasserin aut Costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes 2008 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<The evolutionary dynamics of xenobiotic resistance depends on how resistance mutations influence the fitness of their bearers, both in the presence and absence of xenobiotic selection pressure. In cases of multiple resistance, these dynamics will also depend on how individual resistance mutations interact with one another, and on the xenobiotics applied against them. We compared <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes harbouring two resistance alleles <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<and <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<(conferring resistance to carbamate and pyrethroid insecticides, respectively) to mosquitoes bearing only one of the alleles, or neither allele. Comparisons were made in environments where both, only one, or neither type of insecticide was present.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<Each resistance allele was associated with fitness costs (survival to adulthood) in an insecticide-free environment, with the costs of <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<being greater than for <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R</it<</sup<. However, there was a notable interaction in that the costs of harbouring both alleles were significantly less than for harbouring <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<alone. The two insecticides combined in an additive, synergistic and antagonistic manner depending on a mosquito's resistance status, but were not predictable based on the presence/absence of either, or both mutations.</p< <p<Conclusion</p< <p<Insecticide resistance mutations interacted to positively or negatively influence a mosquito's fitness, both in the presence or absence of insecticides. In particular, the presence of the <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation compensated for the costs of the <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation in an insecticide-free environment, suggesting the strength of selection in untreated areas would be less against mosquitoes resistant to both insecticides than for those resistant to carbamates alone. Additional interactions suggest the dynamics of resistance will be difficult to predict in populations where multiple resistance mutations are present or that are subject to treatment by different xenobiotics.</p< Evolution Agnew Philip verfasserin aut Duchon Stéphane verfasserin aut Bonnet Julien verfasserin aut Berticat Claire verfasserin aut Corbel Vincent verfasserin aut In BMC Evolutionary Biology BMC, 2003 8(2008), 1, p 104 (DE-627)32664489X (DE-600)2041493-6 14712148 nnns volume:8 year:2008 number:1, p 104 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-104 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda kostenfrei http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/104 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2148 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2008 1, p 104 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1186/1471-2148-8-104 doi (DE-627)DOAJ050738844 (DE-599)DOAJd5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH359-425 Weill Mylène verfasserin aut Costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes 2008 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<The evolutionary dynamics of xenobiotic resistance depends on how resistance mutations influence the fitness of their bearers, both in the presence and absence of xenobiotic selection pressure. In cases of multiple resistance, these dynamics will also depend on how individual resistance mutations interact with one another, and on the xenobiotics applied against them. We compared <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes harbouring two resistance alleles <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<and <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<(conferring resistance to carbamate and pyrethroid insecticides, respectively) to mosquitoes bearing only one of the alleles, or neither allele. Comparisons were made in environments where both, only one, or neither type of insecticide was present.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<Each resistance allele was associated with fitness costs (survival to adulthood) in an insecticide-free environment, with the costs of <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<being greater than for <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R</it<</sup<. However, there was a notable interaction in that the costs of harbouring both alleles were significantly less than for harbouring <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<alone. The two insecticides combined in an additive, synergistic and antagonistic manner depending on a mosquito's resistance status, but were not predictable based on the presence/absence of either, or both mutations.</p< <p<Conclusion</p< <p<Insecticide resistance mutations interacted to positively or negatively influence a mosquito's fitness, both in the presence or absence of insecticides. In particular, the presence of the <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation compensated for the costs of the <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation in an insecticide-free environment, suggesting the strength of selection in untreated areas would be less against mosquitoes resistant to both insecticides than for those resistant to carbamates alone. Additional interactions suggest the dynamics of resistance will be difficult to predict in populations where multiple resistance mutations are present or that are subject to treatment by different xenobiotics.</p< Evolution Agnew Philip verfasserin aut Duchon Stéphane verfasserin aut Bonnet Julien verfasserin aut Berticat Claire verfasserin aut Corbel Vincent verfasserin aut In BMC Evolutionary Biology BMC, 2003 8(2008), 1, p 104 (DE-627)32664489X (DE-600)2041493-6 14712148 nnns volume:8 year:2008 number:1, p 104 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-104 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda kostenfrei http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/104 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2148 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2008 1, p 104 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1186/1471-2148-8-104 doi (DE-627)DOAJ050738844 (DE-599)DOAJd5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH359-425 Weill Mylène verfasserin aut Costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes 2008 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<The evolutionary dynamics of xenobiotic resistance depends on how resistance mutations influence the fitness of their bearers, both in the presence and absence of xenobiotic selection pressure. In cases of multiple resistance, these dynamics will also depend on how individual resistance mutations interact with one another, and on the xenobiotics applied against them. We compared <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes harbouring two resistance alleles <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<and <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<(conferring resistance to carbamate and pyrethroid insecticides, respectively) to mosquitoes bearing only one of the alleles, or neither allele. Comparisons were made in environments where both, only one, or neither type of insecticide was present.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<Each resistance allele was associated with fitness costs (survival to adulthood) in an insecticide-free environment, with the costs of <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<being greater than for <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R</it<</sup<. However, there was a notable interaction in that the costs of harbouring both alleles were significantly less than for harbouring <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<alone. The two insecticides combined in an additive, synergistic and antagonistic manner depending on a mosquito's resistance status, but were not predictable based on the presence/absence of either, or both mutations.</p< <p<Conclusion</p< <p<Insecticide resistance mutations interacted to positively or negatively influence a mosquito's fitness, both in the presence or absence of insecticides. In particular, the presence of the <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation compensated for the costs of the <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation in an insecticide-free environment, suggesting the strength of selection in untreated areas would be less against mosquitoes resistant to both insecticides than for those resistant to carbamates alone. Additional interactions suggest the dynamics of resistance will be difficult to predict in populations where multiple resistance mutations are present or that are subject to treatment by different xenobiotics.</p< Evolution Agnew Philip verfasserin aut Duchon Stéphane verfasserin aut Bonnet Julien verfasserin aut Berticat Claire verfasserin aut Corbel Vincent verfasserin aut In BMC Evolutionary Biology BMC, 2003 8(2008), 1, p 104 (DE-627)32664489X (DE-600)2041493-6 14712148 nnns volume:8 year:2008 number:1, p 104 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-104 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda kostenfrei http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/104 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2148 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2008 1, p 104 |
language |
English |
source |
In BMC Evolutionary Biology 8(2008), 1, p 104 volume:8 year:2008 number:1, p 104 |
sourceStr |
In BMC Evolutionary Biology 8(2008), 1, p 104 volume:8 year:2008 number:1, p 104 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Evolution |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
BMC Evolutionary Biology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Weill Mylène @@aut@@ Agnew Philip @@aut@@ Duchon Stéphane @@aut@@ Bonnet Julien @@aut@@ Berticat Claire @@aut@@ Corbel Vincent @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2008-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
32664489X |
id |
DOAJ050738844 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ050738844</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308154703.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/1471-2148-8-104</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ050738844</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH359-425</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weill Mylène</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"><p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<The evolutionary dynamics of xenobiotic resistance depends on how resistance mutations influence the fitness of their bearers, both in the presence and absence of xenobiotic selection pressure. In cases of multiple resistance, these dynamics will also depend on how individual resistance mutations interact with one another, and on the xenobiotics applied against them. We compared <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes harbouring two resistance alleles <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<and <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<(conferring resistance to carbamate and pyrethroid insecticides, respectively) to mosquitoes bearing only one of the alleles, or neither allele. Comparisons were made in environments where both, only one, or neither type of insecticide was present.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<Each resistance allele was associated with fitness costs (survival to adulthood) in an insecticide-free environment, with the costs of <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<being greater than for <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R</it<</sup<. However, there was a notable interaction in that the costs of harbouring both alleles were significantly less than for harbouring <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<alone. The two insecticides combined in an additive, synergistic and antagonistic manner depending on a mosquito's resistance status, but were not predictable based on the presence/absence of either, or both mutations.</p< <p<Conclusion</p< <p<Insecticide resistance mutations interacted to positively or negatively influence a mosquito's fitness, both in the presence or absence of insecticides. In particular, the presence of the <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation compensated for the costs of the <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation in an insecticide-free environment, suggesting the strength of selection in untreated areas would be less against mosquitoes resistant to both insecticides than for those resistant to carbamates alone. Additional interactions suggest the dynamics of resistance will be difficult to predict in populations where multiple resistance mutations are present or that are subject to treatment by different xenobiotics.</p<</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evolution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Agnew Philip</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duchon Stéphane</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bonnet Julien</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Berticat Claire</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Corbel Vincent</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">BMC Evolutionary Biology</subfield><subfield code="d">BMC, 2003</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2008), 1, p 104</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)32664489X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2041493-6</subfield><subfield code="x">14712148</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2008</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1, p 104</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-104</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/104</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2148</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2008</subfield><subfield code="e">1, p 104</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
Q - Science |
author |
Weill Mylène |
spellingShingle |
Weill Mylène misc QH359-425 misc Evolution Costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes |
authorStr |
Weill Mylène |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)32664489X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
QH359-425 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
14712148 |
topic_title |
QH359-425 Costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes |
topic |
misc QH359-425 misc Evolution |
topic_unstemmed |
misc QH359-425 misc Evolution |
topic_browse |
misc QH359-425 misc Evolution |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
BMC Evolutionary Biology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
32664489X |
hierarchy_top_title |
BMC Evolutionary Biology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)32664489X (DE-600)2041493-6 |
title |
Costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ050738844 (DE-599)DOAJd5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda |
title_full |
Costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes |
author_sort |
Weill Mylène |
journal |
BMC Evolutionary Biology |
journalStr |
BMC Evolutionary Biology |
callnumber-first-code |
Q |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2008 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Weill Mylène Agnew Philip Duchon Stéphane Bonnet Julien Berticat Claire Corbel Vincent |
container_volume |
8 |
class |
QH359-425 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Weill Mylène |
doi_str_mv |
10.1186/1471-2148-8-104 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for <it<culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes |
callnumber |
QH359-425 |
title_auth |
Costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes |
abstract |
<p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<The evolutionary dynamics of xenobiotic resistance depends on how resistance mutations influence the fitness of their bearers, both in the presence and absence of xenobiotic selection pressure. In cases of multiple resistance, these dynamics will also depend on how individual resistance mutations interact with one another, and on the xenobiotics applied against them. We compared <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes harbouring two resistance alleles <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<and <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<(conferring resistance to carbamate and pyrethroid insecticides, respectively) to mosquitoes bearing only one of the alleles, or neither allele. Comparisons were made in environments where both, only one, or neither type of insecticide was present.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<Each resistance allele was associated with fitness costs (survival to adulthood) in an insecticide-free environment, with the costs of <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<being greater than for <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R</it<</sup<. However, there was a notable interaction in that the costs of harbouring both alleles were significantly less than for harbouring <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<alone. The two insecticides combined in an additive, synergistic and antagonistic manner depending on a mosquito's resistance status, but were not predictable based on the presence/absence of either, or both mutations.</p< <p<Conclusion</p< <p<Insecticide resistance mutations interacted to positively or negatively influence a mosquito's fitness, both in the presence or absence of insecticides. In particular, the presence of the <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation compensated for the costs of the <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation in an insecticide-free environment, suggesting the strength of selection in untreated areas would be less against mosquitoes resistant to both insecticides than for those resistant to carbamates alone. Additional interactions suggest the dynamics of resistance will be difficult to predict in populations where multiple resistance mutations are present or that are subject to treatment by different xenobiotics.</p< |
abstractGer |
<p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<The evolutionary dynamics of xenobiotic resistance depends on how resistance mutations influence the fitness of their bearers, both in the presence and absence of xenobiotic selection pressure. In cases of multiple resistance, these dynamics will also depend on how individual resistance mutations interact with one another, and on the xenobiotics applied against them. We compared <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes harbouring two resistance alleles <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<and <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<(conferring resistance to carbamate and pyrethroid insecticides, respectively) to mosquitoes bearing only one of the alleles, or neither allele. Comparisons were made in environments where both, only one, or neither type of insecticide was present.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<Each resistance allele was associated with fitness costs (survival to adulthood) in an insecticide-free environment, with the costs of <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<being greater than for <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R</it<</sup<. However, there was a notable interaction in that the costs of harbouring both alleles were significantly less than for harbouring <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<alone. The two insecticides combined in an additive, synergistic and antagonistic manner depending on a mosquito's resistance status, but were not predictable based on the presence/absence of either, or both mutations.</p< <p<Conclusion</p< <p<Insecticide resistance mutations interacted to positively or negatively influence a mosquito's fitness, both in the presence or absence of insecticides. In particular, the presence of the <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation compensated for the costs of the <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation in an insecticide-free environment, suggesting the strength of selection in untreated areas would be less against mosquitoes resistant to both insecticides than for those resistant to carbamates alone. Additional interactions suggest the dynamics of resistance will be difficult to predict in populations where multiple resistance mutations are present or that are subject to treatment by different xenobiotics.</p< |
abstract_unstemmed |
<p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<The evolutionary dynamics of xenobiotic resistance depends on how resistance mutations influence the fitness of their bearers, both in the presence and absence of xenobiotic selection pressure. In cases of multiple resistance, these dynamics will also depend on how individual resistance mutations interact with one another, and on the xenobiotics applied against them. We compared <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes harbouring two resistance alleles <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<and <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<(conferring resistance to carbamate and pyrethroid insecticides, respectively) to mosquitoes bearing only one of the alleles, or neither allele. Comparisons were made in environments where both, only one, or neither type of insecticide was present.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<Each resistance allele was associated with fitness costs (survival to adulthood) in an insecticide-free environment, with the costs of <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<being greater than for <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R</it<</sup<. However, there was a notable interaction in that the costs of harbouring both alleles were significantly less than for harbouring <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<alone. The two insecticides combined in an additive, synergistic and antagonistic manner depending on a mosquito's resistance status, but were not predictable based on the presence/absence of either, or both mutations.</p< <p<Conclusion</p< <p<Insecticide resistance mutations interacted to positively or negatively influence a mosquito's fitness, both in the presence or absence of insecticides. In particular, the presence of the <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation compensated for the costs of the <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation in an insecticide-free environment, suggesting the strength of selection in untreated areas would be less against mosquitoes resistant to both insecticides than for those resistant to carbamates alone. Additional interactions suggest the dynamics of resistance will be difficult to predict in populations where multiple resistance mutations are present or that are subject to treatment by different xenobiotics.</p< |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
1, p 104 |
title_short |
Costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-104 https://doaj.org/article/d5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/104 https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2148 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Agnew Philip Duchon Stéphane Bonnet Julien Berticat Claire Corbel Vincent |
author2Str |
Agnew Philip Duchon Stéphane Bonnet Julien Berticat Claire Corbel Vincent |
ppnlink |
32664489X |
callnumber-subject |
QH - Natural History and Biology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1186/1471-2148-8-104 |
callnumber-a |
QH359-425 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T16:30:25.870Z |
_version_ |
1803576122667958272 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ050738844</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308154703.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/1471-2148-8-104</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ050738844</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH359-425</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weill Mylène</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"><p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<The evolutionary dynamics of xenobiotic resistance depends on how resistance mutations influence the fitness of their bearers, both in the presence and absence of xenobiotic selection pressure. In cases of multiple resistance, these dynamics will also depend on how individual resistance mutations interact with one another, and on the xenobiotics applied against them. We compared <it<Culex quinquefasciatus </it<mosquitoes harbouring two resistance alleles <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<and <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<(conferring resistance to carbamate and pyrethroid insecticides, respectively) to mosquitoes bearing only one of the alleles, or neither allele. Comparisons were made in environments where both, only one, or neither type of insecticide was present.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<Each resistance allele was associated with fitness costs (survival to adulthood) in an insecticide-free environment, with the costs of <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<being greater than for <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R</it<</sup<. However, there was a notable interaction in that the costs of harbouring both alleles were significantly less than for harbouring <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<alone. The two insecticides combined in an additive, synergistic and antagonistic manner depending on a mosquito's resistance status, but were not predictable based on the presence/absence of either, or both mutations.</p< <p<Conclusion</p< <p<Insecticide resistance mutations interacted to positively or negatively influence a mosquito's fitness, both in the presence or absence of insecticides. In particular, the presence of the <it<Kdr</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation compensated for the costs of the <it<ace-1</it<<sup<<it<R </it<</sup<mutation in an insecticide-free environment, suggesting the strength of selection in untreated areas would be less against mosquitoes resistant to both insecticides than for those resistant to carbamates alone. Additional interactions suggest the dynamics of resistance will be difficult to predict in populations where multiple resistance mutations are present or that are subject to treatment by different xenobiotics.</p<</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evolution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Agnew Philip</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duchon Stéphane</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bonnet Julien</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Berticat Claire</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Corbel Vincent</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">BMC Evolutionary Biology</subfield><subfield code="d">BMC, 2003</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2008), 1, p 104</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)32664489X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2041493-6</subfield><subfield code="x">14712148</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2008</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1, p 104</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-104</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d5d846efcf6c412981b92f8ef9833dda</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/104</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2148</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2008</subfield><subfield code="e">1, p 104</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399867 |