Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction produced in three static lifting styles

Background: There is considerable professional debate over which technique is the best for lifting. The aim of this study is to compare three static lifting styles, the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift, using maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) as one indicator for recommending a lifting st...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Sarrafzadeh J [verfasserIn] Ebrahimi Takamjani A [verfasserIn] Khosravi A [verfasserIn] Haery F [verfasserIn] Seyed Hosseini L [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Persisch

Erschienen:	2007

Schlagwörter:	MIVC Stoop lift Semi-squat lift Arm lift Lifting styles

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Tehran University Medical Journal - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2007, 64(2007), 12, Seite 48-56
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:64 ; year:2007 ; number:12 ; pages:48-56

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ050874624

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ050874624
003	DE-627
005	20230308155247.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2007 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|per c
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ050874624
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJd4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a per
050		0	\|a R5-920
100	0		\|a Sarrafzadeh J \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction produced in three static lifting styles
264		1	\|c 2007
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Background: There is considerable professional debate over which technique is the best for lifting. The aim of this study is to compare three static lifting styles, the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift, using maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) as one indicator for recommending a lifting style. Methods: Thirty healthy women (mean age: 22.37 years) participated in this quasi-experimental study. They performed the tests in static postures by standing on the platform of the Lift TrackTM and pulling the dynamometer of the instrument with maximum effort in three lifting styles: the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift. The subjects warmed-up by practicing the lifts first. The mean MIVC from the two other sets of lifts were used for statistical analysis by repeated measurements and SPSS (ver.10) software. Results: There were significant differences between the MIVC of the three lifting styles in this study. The largest MIVC was for the semi-squat lift and was the least was for the arm lift (p<0.001). The MIVC of the stoop lift was larger than that of the arm lift (p<0.001). Conclusion: The largest MIVC for the semi-squat lift suggests that this style is useful for lifting objects from the floor. The differences in biomechanical and muscle pattern activity changes could explain these results. It seems that activation of the quadriceps muscles in the semi-squat lift was a main factor for producing more MIVC, so when this style is recommended for lifting, attention to the power of the quadriceps is important.
650		4	\|a MIVC
650		4	\|a Stoop lift
650		4	\|a Semi-squat lift
650		4	\|a Arm lift
650		4	\|a Lifting styles
653		0	\|a Medicine (General)
700	0		\|a Ebrahimi Takamjani A \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Khosravi A \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Haery F \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Seyed Hosseini L \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Tehran University Medical Journal \|d Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2007 \|g 64(2007), 12, Seite 48-56 \|w (DE-627)590956442 \|w (DE-600)2477016-4 \|x 17357322 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:64 \|g year:2007 \|g number:12 \|g pages:48-56
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/d4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/3389.pdf&manuscript_id=3389 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1683-1764 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1735-7322 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 64 \|j 2007 \|e 12 \|h 48-56

Indexfelder

author_variant	s j sj e t a eta k a ka h f hf s h l shl
matchkey_str	article:17357322:2007----::aiuvlnaysmticnrcinrdcdnhe
hierarchy_sort_str	2007
callnumber-subject-code	R
publishDate	2007
allfields	(DE-627)DOAJ050874624 (DE-599)DOAJd4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per R5-920 Sarrafzadeh J verfasserin aut Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction produced in three static lifting styles 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: There is considerable professional debate over which technique is the best for lifting. The aim of this study is to compare three static lifting styles, the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift, using maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) as one indicator for recommending a lifting style. Methods: Thirty healthy women (mean age: 22.37 years) participated in this quasi-experimental study. They performed the tests in static postures by standing on the platform of the Lift TrackTM and pulling the dynamometer of the instrument with maximum effort in three lifting styles: the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift. The subjects warmed-up by practicing the lifts first. The mean MIVC from the two other sets of lifts were used for statistical analysis by repeated measurements and SPSS (ver.10) software. Results: There were significant differences between the MIVC of the three lifting styles in this study. The largest MIVC was for the semi-squat lift and was the least was for the arm lift (p<0.001). The MIVC of the stoop lift was larger than that of the arm lift (p<0.001). Conclusion: The largest MIVC for the semi-squat lift suggests that this style is useful for lifting objects from the floor. The differences in biomechanical and muscle pattern activity changes could explain these results. It seems that activation of the quadriceps muscles in the semi-squat lift was a main factor for producing more MIVC, so when this style is recommended for lifting, attention to the power of the quadriceps is important. MIVC Stoop lift Semi-squat lift Arm lift Lifting styles Medicine (General) Ebrahimi Takamjani A verfasserin aut Khosravi A verfasserin aut Haery F verfasserin aut Seyed Hosseini L verfasserin aut In Tehran University Medical Journal Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2007 64(2007), 12, Seite 48-56 (DE-627)590956442 (DE-600)2477016-4 17357322 nnns volume:64 year:2007 number:12 pages:48-56 https://doaj.org/article/d4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870 kostenfrei http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/3389.pdf&manuscript_id=3389 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1683-1764 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1735-7322 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 64 2007 12 48-56
spelling	(DE-627)DOAJ050874624 (DE-599)DOAJd4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per R5-920 Sarrafzadeh J verfasserin aut Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction produced in three static lifting styles 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: There is considerable professional debate over which technique is the best for lifting. The aim of this study is to compare three static lifting styles, the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift, using maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) as one indicator for recommending a lifting style. Methods: Thirty healthy women (mean age: 22.37 years) participated in this quasi-experimental study. They performed the tests in static postures by standing on the platform of the Lift TrackTM and pulling the dynamometer of the instrument with maximum effort in three lifting styles: the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift. The subjects warmed-up by practicing the lifts first. The mean MIVC from the two other sets of lifts were used for statistical analysis by repeated measurements and SPSS (ver.10) software. Results: There were significant differences between the MIVC of the three lifting styles in this study. The largest MIVC was for the semi-squat lift and was the least was for the arm lift (p<0.001). The MIVC of the stoop lift was larger than that of the arm lift (p<0.001). Conclusion: The largest MIVC for the semi-squat lift suggests that this style is useful for lifting objects from the floor. The differences in biomechanical and muscle pattern activity changes could explain these results. It seems that activation of the quadriceps muscles in the semi-squat lift was a main factor for producing more MIVC, so when this style is recommended for lifting, attention to the power of the quadriceps is important. MIVC Stoop lift Semi-squat lift Arm lift Lifting styles Medicine (General) Ebrahimi Takamjani A verfasserin aut Khosravi A verfasserin aut Haery F verfasserin aut Seyed Hosseini L verfasserin aut In Tehran University Medical Journal Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2007 64(2007), 12, Seite 48-56 (DE-627)590956442 (DE-600)2477016-4 17357322 nnns volume:64 year:2007 number:12 pages:48-56 https://doaj.org/article/d4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870 kostenfrei http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/3389.pdf&manuscript_id=3389 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1683-1764 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1735-7322 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 64 2007 12 48-56
allfields_unstemmed	(DE-627)DOAJ050874624 (DE-599)DOAJd4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per R5-920 Sarrafzadeh J verfasserin aut Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction produced in three static lifting styles 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: There is considerable professional debate over which technique is the best for lifting. The aim of this study is to compare three static lifting styles, the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift, using maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) as one indicator for recommending a lifting style. Methods: Thirty healthy women (mean age: 22.37 years) participated in this quasi-experimental study. They performed the tests in static postures by standing on the platform of the Lift TrackTM and pulling the dynamometer of the instrument with maximum effort in three lifting styles: the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift. The subjects warmed-up by practicing the lifts first. The mean MIVC from the two other sets of lifts were used for statistical analysis by repeated measurements and SPSS (ver.10) software. Results: There were significant differences between the MIVC of the three lifting styles in this study. The largest MIVC was for the semi-squat lift and was the least was for the arm lift (p<0.001). The MIVC of the stoop lift was larger than that of the arm lift (p<0.001). Conclusion: The largest MIVC for the semi-squat lift suggests that this style is useful for lifting objects from the floor. The differences in biomechanical and muscle pattern activity changes could explain these results. It seems that activation of the quadriceps muscles in the semi-squat lift was a main factor for producing more MIVC, so when this style is recommended for lifting, attention to the power of the quadriceps is important. MIVC Stoop lift Semi-squat lift Arm lift Lifting styles Medicine (General) Ebrahimi Takamjani A verfasserin aut Khosravi A verfasserin aut Haery F verfasserin aut Seyed Hosseini L verfasserin aut In Tehran University Medical Journal Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2007 64(2007), 12, Seite 48-56 (DE-627)590956442 (DE-600)2477016-4 17357322 nnns volume:64 year:2007 number:12 pages:48-56 https://doaj.org/article/d4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870 kostenfrei http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/3389.pdf&manuscript_id=3389 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1683-1764 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1735-7322 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 64 2007 12 48-56
allfieldsGer	(DE-627)DOAJ050874624 (DE-599)DOAJd4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per R5-920 Sarrafzadeh J verfasserin aut Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction produced in three static lifting styles 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: There is considerable professional debate over which technique is the best for lifting. The aim of this study is to compare three static lifting styles, the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift, using maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) as one indicator for recommending a lifting style. Methods: Thirty healthy women (mean age: 22.37 years) participated in this quasi-experimental study. They performed the tests in static postures by standing on the platform of the Lift TrackTM and pulling the dynamometer of the instrument with maximum effort in three lifting styles: the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift. The subjects warmed-up by practicing the lifts first. The mean MIVC from the two other sets of lifts were used for statistical analysis by repeated measurements and SPSS (ver.10) software. Results: There were significant differences between the MIVC of the three lifting styles in this study. The largest MIVC was for the semi-squat lift and was the least was for the arm lift (p<0.001). The MIVC of the stoop lift was larger than that of the arm lift (p<0.001). Conclusion: The largest MIVC for the semi-squat lift suggests that this style is useful for lifting objects from the floor. The differences in biomechanical and muscle pattern activity changes could explain these results. It seems that activation of the quadriceps muscles in the semi-squat lift was a main factor for producing more MIVC, so when this style is recommended for lifting, attention to the power of the quadriceps is important. MIVC Stoop lift Semi-squat lift Arm lift Lifting styles Medicine (General) Ebrahimi Takamjani A verfasserin aut Khosravi A verfasserin aut Haery F verfasserin aut Seyed Hosseini L verfasserin aut In Tehran University Medical Journal Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2007 64(2007), 12, Seite 48-56 (DE-627)590956442 (DE-600)2477016-4 17357322 nnns volume:64 year:2007 number:12 pages:48-56 https://doaj.org/article/d4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870 kostenfrei http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/3389.pdf&manuscript_id=3389 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1683-1764 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1735-7322 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 64 2007 12 48-56
allfieldsSound	(DE-627)DOAJ050874624 (DE-599)DOAJd4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per R5-920 Sarrafzadeh J verfasserin aut Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction produced in three static lifting styles 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: There is considerable professional debate over which technique is the best for lifting. The aim of this study is to compare three static lifting styles, the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift, using maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) as one indicator for recommending a lifting style. Methods: Thirty healthy women (mean age: 22.37 years) participated in this quasi-experimental study. They performed the tests in static postures by standing on the platform of the Lift TrackTM and pulling the dynamometer of the instrument with maximum effort in three lifting styles: the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift. The subjects warmed-up by practicing the lifts first. The mean MIVC from the two other sets of lifts were used for statistical analysis by repeated measurements and SPSS (ver.10) software. Results: There were significant differences between the MIVC of the three lifting styles in this study. The largest MIVC was for the semi-squat lift and was the least was for the arm lift (p<0.001). The MIVC of the stoop lift was larger than that of the arm lift (p<0.001). Conclusion: The largest MIVC for the semi-squat lift suggests that this style is useful for lifting objects from the floor. The differences in biomechanical and muscle pattern activity changes could explain these results. It seems that activation of the quadriceps muscles in the semi-squat lift was a main factor for producing more MIVC, so when this style is recommended for lifting, attention to the power of the quadriceps is important. MIVC Stoop lift Semi-squat lift Arm lift Lifting styles Medicine (General) Ebrahimi Takamjani A verfasserin aut Khosravi A verfasserin aut Haery F verfasserin aut Seyed Hosseini L verfasserin aut In Tehran University Medical Journal Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2007 64(2007), 12, Seite 48-56 (DE-627)590956442 (DE-600)2477016-4 17357322 nnns volume:64 year:2007 number:12 pages:48-56 https://doaj.org/article/d4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870 kostenfrei http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/3389.pdf&manuscript_id=3389 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1683-1764 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1735-7322 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 64 2007 12 48-56
language	Persian
source	In Tehran University Medical Journal 64(2007), 12, Seite 48-56 volume:64 year:2007 number:12 pages:48-56
sourceStr	In Tehran University Medical Journal 64(2007), 12, Seite 48-56 volume:64 year:2007 number:12 pages:48-56
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	MIVC Stoop lift Semi-squat lift Arm lift Lifting styles Medicine (General)
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Tehran University Medical Journal
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Sarrafzadeh J @@aut@@ Ebrahimi Takamjani A @@aut@@ Khosravi A @@aut@@ Haery F @@aut@@ Seyed Hosseini L @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2007-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	590956442
id	DOAJ050874624
language_de	persisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ050874624</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308155247.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2007 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|per c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ050874624</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R5-920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sarrafzadeh J</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction produced in three static lifting styles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: There is considerable professional debate over which technique is the best for lifting. The aim of this study is to compare three static lifting styles, the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift, using maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) as one indicator for recommending a lifting style. Methods: Thirty healthy women (mean age: 22.37 years) participated in this quasi-experimental study. They performed the tests in static postures by standing on the platform of the Lift TrackTM and pulling the dynamometer of the instrument with maximum effort in three lifting styles: the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift. The subjects warmed-up by practicing the lifts first. The mean MIVC from the two other sets of lifts were used for statistical analysis by repeated measurements and SPSS (ver.10) software. Results: There were significant differences between the MIVC of the three lifting styles in this study. The largest MIVC was for the semi-squat lift and was the least was for the arm lift (p&lt;0.001). The MIVC of the stoop lift was larger than that of the arm lift (p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: The largest MIVC for the semi-squat lift suggests that this style is useful for lifting objects from the floor. The differences in biomechanical and muscle pattern activity changes could explain these results. It seems that activation of the quadriceps muscles in the semi-squat lift was a main factor for producing more MIVC, so when this style is recommended for lifting, attention to the power of the quadriceps is important.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">MIVC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stoop lift</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Semi-squat lift</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arm lift</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lifting styles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ebrahimi Takamjani A</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Khosravi A</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Haery F</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seyed Hosseini L</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Tehran University Medical Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2007</subfield><subfield code="g">64(2007), 12, Seite 48-56</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)590956442</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2477016-4</subfield><subfield code="x">17357322</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:64</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:48-56</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/3389.pdf&amp;manuscript_id=3389</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1683-1764</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1735-7322</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">64</subfield><subfield code="j">2007</subfield><subfield code="e">12</subfield><subfield code="h">48-56</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Sarrafzadeh J
spellingShingle	Sarrafzadeh J misc R5-920 misc MIVC misc Stoop lift misc Semi-squat lift misc Arm lift misc Lifting styles misc Medicine (General) Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction produced in three static lifting styles
authorStr	Sarrafzadeh J
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)590956442
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	R5-920
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	17357322
topic_title	R5-920 Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction produced in three static lifting styles MIVC Stoop lift Semi-squat lift Arm lift Lifting styles
topic	misc R5-920 misc MIVC misc Stoop lift misc Semi-squat lift misc Arm lift misc Lifting styles misc Medicine (General)
topic_unstemmed	misc R5-920 misc MIVC misc Stoop lift misc Semi-squat lift misc Arm lift misc Lifting styles misc Medicine (General)
topic_browse	misc R5-920 misc MIVC misc Stoop lift misc Semi-squat lift misc Arm lift misc Lifting styles misc Medicine (General)
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Tehran University Medical Journal
hierarchy_parent_id	590956442
hierarchy_top_title	Tehran University Medical Journal
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)590956442 (DE-600)2477016-4
title	Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction produced in three static lifting styles
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ050874624 (DE-599)DOAJd4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870
title_full	Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction produced in three static lifting styles
author_sort	Sarrafzadeh J
journal	Tehran University Medical Journal
journalStr	Tehran University Medical Journal
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	per
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2007
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	48
author_browse	Sarrafzadeh J Ebrahimi Takamjani A Khosravi A Haery F Seyed Hosseini L
container_volume	64
class	R5-920
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Sarrafzadeh J
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	maximum voluntary isometric contraction produced in three static lifting styles
callnumber	R5-920
title_auth	Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction produced in three static lifting styles
abstract	Background: There is considerable professional debate over which technique is the best for lifting. The aim of this study is to compare three static lifting styles, the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift, using maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) as one indicator for recommending a lifting style. Methods: Thirty healthy women (mean age: 22.37 years) participated in this quasi-experimental study. They performed the tests in static postures by standing on the platform of the Lift TrackTM and pulling the dynamometer of the instrument with maximum effort in three lifting styles: the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift. The subjects warmed-up by practicing the lifts first. The mean MIVC from the two other sets of lifts were used for statistical analysis by repeated measurements and SPSS (ver.10) software. Results: There were significant differences between the MIVC of the three lifting styles in this study. The largest MIVC was for the semi-squat lift and was the least was for the arm lift (p<0.001). The MIVC of the stoop lift was larger than that of the arm lift (p<0.001). Conclusion: The largest MIVC for the semi-squat lift suggests that this style is useful for lifting objects from the floor. The differences in biomechanical and muscle pattern activity changes could explain these results. It seems that activation of the quadriceps muscles in the semi-squat lift was a main factor for producing more MIVC, so when this style is recommended for lifting, attention to the power of the quadriceps is important.
abstractGer	Background: There is considerable professional debate over which technique is the best for lifting. The aim of this study is to compare three static lifting styles, the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift, using maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) as one indicator for recommending a lifting style. Methods: Thirty healthy women (mean age: 22.37 years) participated in this quasi-experimental study. They performed the tests in static postures by standing on the platform of the Lift TrackTM and pulling the dynamometer of the instrument with maximum effort in three lifting styles: the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift. The subjects warmed-up by practicing the lifts first. The mean MIVC from the two other sets of lifts were used for statistical analysis by repeated measurements and SPSS (ver.10) software. Results: There were significant differences between the MIVC of the three lifting styles in this study. The largest MIVC was for the semi-squat lift and was the least was for the arm lift (p<0.001). The MIVC of the stoop lift was larger than that of the arm lift (p<0.001). Conclusion: The largest MIVC for the semi-squat lift suggests that this style is useful for lifting objects from the floor. The differences in biomechanical and muscle pattern activity changes could explain these results. It seems that activation of the quadriceps muscles in the semi-squat lift was a main factor for producing more MIVC, so when this style is recommended for lifting, attention to the power of the quadriceps is important.
abstract_unstemmed	Background: There is considerable professional debate over which technique is the best for lifting. The aim of this study is to compare three static lifting styles, the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift, using maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) as one indicator for recommending a lifting style. Methods: Thirty healthy women (mean age: 22.37 years) participated in this quasi-experimental study. They performed the tests in static postures by standing on the platform of the Lift TrackTM and pulling the dynamometer of the instrument with maximum effort in three lifting styles: the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift. The subjects warmed-up by practicing the lifts first. The mean MIVC from the two other sets of lifts were used for statistical analysis by repeated measurements and SPSS (ver.10) software. Results: There were significant differences between the MIVC of the three lifting styles in this study. The largest MIVC was for the semi-squat lift and was the least was for the arm lift (p<0.001). The MIVC of the stoop lift was larger than that of the arm lift (p<0.001). Conclusion: The largest MIVC for the semi-squat lift suggests that this style is useful for lifting objects from the floor. The differences in biomechanical and muscle pattern activity changes could explain these results. It seems that activation of the quadriceps muscles in the semi-squat lift was a main factor for producing more MIVC, so when this style is recommended for lifting, attention to the power of the quadriceps is important.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	12
title_short	Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction produced in three static lifting styles
url	https://doaj.org/article/d4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870 http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/3389.pdf&manuscript_id=3389 https://doaj.org/toc/1683-1764 https://doaj.org/toc/1735-7322
remote_bool	true
author2	Ebrahimi Takamjani A Khosravi A Haery F Seyed Hosseini L
author2Str	Ebrahimi Takamjani A Khosravi A Haery F Seyed Hosseini L
ppnlink	590956442
callnumber-subject	R - General Medicine
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
callnumber-a	R5-920
up_date	2024-07-03T17:13:17.391Z
_version_	1803578819113648128
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ050874624</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308155247.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2007 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|per c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ050874624</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R5-920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sarrafzadeh J</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction produced in three static lifting styles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: There is considerable professional debate over which technique is the best for lifting. The aim of this study is to compare three static lifting styles, the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift, using maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) as one indicator for recommending a lifting style. Methods: Thirty healthy women (mean age: 22.37 years) participated in this quasi-experimental study. They performed the tests in static postures by standing on the platform of the Lift TrackTM and pulling the dynamometer of the instrument with maximum effort in three lifting styles: the stoop, semi-squat and arm lift. The subjects warmed-up by practicing the lifts first. The mean MIVC from the two other sets of lifts were used for statistical analysis by repeated measurements and SPSS (ver.10) software. Results: There were significant differences between the MIVC of the three lifting styles in this study. The largest MIVC was for the semi-squat lift and was the least was for the arm lift (p&lt;0.001). The MIVC of the stoop lift was larger than that of the arm lift (p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: The largest MIVC for the semi-squat lift suggests that this style is useful for lifting objects from the floor. The differences in biomechanical and muscle pattern activity changes could explain these results. It seems that activation of the quadriceps muscles in the semi-squat lift was a main factor for producing more MIVC, so when this style is recommended for lifting, attention to the power of the quadriceps is important.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">MIVC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stoop lift</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Semi-squat lift</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arm lift</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lifting styles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ebrahimi Takamjani A</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Khosravi A</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Haery F</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seyed Hosseini L</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Tehran University Medical Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2007</subfield><subfield code="g">64(2007), 12, Seite 48-56</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)590956442</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2477016-4</subfield><subfield code="x">17357322</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:64</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:48-56</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d4fab52607e045cf894b043433bb7870</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/3389.pdf&amp;manuscript_id=3389</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1683-1764</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1735-7322</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">64</subfield><subfield code="j">2007</subfield><subfield code="e">12</subfield><subfield code="h">48-56</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400757

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction produced in three static lifting styles

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?