Patient-initiated second opinions during acute hospital care
Second opinions are used in medicine in order to make better-informed decisions. Only a few studies have examined patient-initiated second opinions, and even fewer have examined it in the context of acute hospitalization. It is not clear whether patients and families are aware of this right and how...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Roni Gagin [verfasserIn] Neta HaGani [verfasserIn] Esti Zigelboim [verfasserIn] Shiri Shinan-Altman [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
patient-initiated second opinions |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Patient Experience Journal - The Beryl Institute, 2018, (2019) |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2019 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ050990659 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ050990659 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230308155708.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ050990659 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a R5-920 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a RA1-1270 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Roni Gagin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Patient-initiated second opinions during acute hospital care |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Second opinions are used in medicine in order to make better-informed decisions. Only a few studies have examined patient-initiated second opinions, and even fewer have examined it in the context of acute hospitalization. It is not clear whether patients and families are aware of this right and how often they exercise it during acute hospitalization. The objective of this paper is to identify factors associated with the awareness and utilization of patient-initiated second opinions. A survey was conducted among 92 neurosurgical patients who completed a questionnaire that included information regarding: awareness of second opinion consultations, reasons for not seeking a second opinion, satisfaction from the second opinion and sharing the results of the second opinion with the first physician. Multivariate Logistic Regression analysis was performed to identify potential confounders associated with awareness and seeking a second opinion. Findings revealed that 79% percent of the participants were aware of their right to receive a second opinion; however, only 31% opted to receive a second opinion before/during the hospitalization. Fifty-eight percent received a second opinion related to previous medical conditions. Fifty-four percent did not inform the first physician about the results. The Logistic Regression showed that health insurance, education, religiosity and gender predicted awareness and utilization of second opinions. Current findings indicate that although patients are aware of their right to a second opinion and many have used it in the past, they rarely use it during acute hospitalization. Encouraging health professionals in hospitals to refer their patients to a second opinion as part of shared decision-making, may improve the liability and efficacy of patients' care. <strong<Experience Framework</strong< This article is associated with the Quality & Clinical Excellence lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework. (<a href="http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework"<http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework</a<) <ul< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/PXSEARCH#resource-list-all/?view_28_page=1&view_28_filters=%5B%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_38%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22in%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22PXJ%20Article%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_20%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_40%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%2C%22Quality%20%26%20Clinical%20Excellence%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_41%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%5D"<Access other PXJ articles</a< related to this lens.</li< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/Ecosystem-QualityClinicalExcellence"<Access other resources</a< related to this lens.</li< </ul< | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a patient-initiated second opinions | |
| 650 | 4 | |a shared decision making | |
| 650 | 4 | |a patient-centered care | |
| 650 | 4 | |a physician-patient relationship | |
| 650 | 4 | |a social work in healthcare | |
| 650 | 4 | |a health communication | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Medicine (General) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Public aspects of medicine | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Neta HaGani |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Esti Zigelboim |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Shiri Shinan-Altman |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Patient Experience Journal |d The Beryl Institute, 2018 |g (2019) |w (DE-627)1760629952 |x 23720247 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2019 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol6/iss3/9 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2372-0247 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2019 | ||
| author_variant |
r g rg n h nh e z ez s s a ssa |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:23720247:2019----::ainiiitdeodpnosuigc |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
R |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ050990659 (DE-599)DOAJ30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 RA1-1270 Roni Gagin verfasserin aut Patient-initiated second opinions during acute hospital care 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Second opinions are used in medicine in order to make better-informed decisions. Only a few studies have examined patient-initiated second opinions, and even fewer have examined it in the context of acute hospitalization. It is not clear whether patients and families are aware of this right and how often they exercise it during acute hospitalization. The objective of this paper is to identify factors associated with the awareness and utilization of patient-initiated second opinions. A survey was conducted among 92 neurosurgical patients who completed a questionnaire that included information regarding: awareness of second opinion consultations, reasons for not seeking a second opinion, satisfaction from the second opinion and sharing the results of the second opinion with the first physician. Multivariate Logistic Regression analysis was performed to identify potential confounders associated with awareness and seeking a second opinion. Findings revealed that 79% percent of the participants were aware of their right to receive a second opinion; however, only 31% opted to receive a second opinion before/during the hospitalization. Fifty-eight percent received a second opinion related to previous medical conditions. Fifty-four percent did not inform the first physician about the results. The Logistic Regression showed that health insurance, education, religiosity and gender predicted awareness and utilization of second opinions. Current findings indicate that although patients are aware of their right to a second opinion and many have used it in the past, they rarely use it during acute hospitalization. Encouraging health professionals in hospitals to refer their patients to a second opinion as part of shared decision-making, may improve the liability and efficacy of patients' care. <strong<Experience Framework</strong< This article is associated with the Quality & Clinical Excellence lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework. (<a href="http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework"<http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework</a<) <ul< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/PXSEARCH#resource-list-all/?view_28_page=1&view_28_filters=%5B%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_38%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22in%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22PXJ%20Article%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_20%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_40%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%2C%22Quality%20%26%20Clinical%20Excellence%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_41%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%5D"<Access other PXJ articles</a< related to this lens.</li< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/Ecosystem-QualityClinicalExcellence"<Access other resources</a< related to this lens.</li< </ul< patient-initiated second opinions shared decision making patient-centered care physician-patient relationship social work in healthcare health communication Medicine (General) Public aspects of medicine Neta HaGani verfasserin aut Esti Zigelboim verfasserin aut Shiri Shinan-Altman verfasserin aut In Patient Experience Journal The Beryl Institute, 2018 (2019) (DE-627)1760629952 23720247 nnns year:2019 https://doaj.org/article/30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d kostenfrei https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol6/iss3/9 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2372-0247 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2019 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ050990659 (DE-599)DOAJ30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 RA1-1270 Roni Gagin verfasserin aut Patient-initiated second opinions during acute hospital care 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Second opinions are used in medicine in order to make better-informed decisions. Only a few studies have examined patient-initiated second opinions, and even fewer have examined it in the context of acute hospitalization. It is not clear whether patients and families are aware of this right and how often they exercise it during acute hospitalization. The objective of this paper is to identify factors associated with the awareness and utilization of patient-initiated second opinions. A survey was conducted among 92 neurosurgical patients who completed a questionnaire that included information regarding: awareness of second opinion consultations, reasons for not seeking a second opinion, satisfaction from the second opinion and sharing the results of the second opinion with the first physician. Multivariate Logistic Regression analysis was performed to identify potential confounders associated with awareness and seeking a second opinion. Findings revealed that 79% percent of the participants were aware of their right to receive a second opinion; however, only 31% opted to receive a second opinion before/during the hospitalization. Fifty-eight percent received a second opinion related to previous medical conditions. Fifty-four percent did not inform the first physician about the results. The Logistic Regression showed that health insurance, education, religiosity and gender predicted awareness and utilization of second opinions. Current findings indicate that although patients are aware of their right to a second opinion and many have used it in the past, they rarely use it during acute hospitalization. Encouraging health professionals in hospitals to refer their patients to a second opinion as part of shared decision-making, may improve the liability and efficacy of patients' care. <strong<Experience Framework</strong< This article is associated with the Quality & Clinical Excellence lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework. (<a href="http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework"<http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework</a<) <ul< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/PXSEARCH#resource-list-all/?view_28_page=1&view_28_filters=%5B%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_38%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22in%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22PXJ%20Article%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_20%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_40%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%2C%22Quality%20%26%20Clinical%20Excellence%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_41%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%5D"<Access other PXJ articles</a< related to this lens.</li< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/Ecosystem-QualityClinicalExcellence"<Access other resources</a< related to this lens.</li< </ul< patient-initiated second opinions shared decision making patient-centered care physician-patient relationship social work in healthcare health communication Medicine (General) Public aspects of medicine Neta HaGani verfasserin aut Esti Zigelboim verfasserin aut Shiri Shinan-Altman verfasserin aut In Patient Experience Journal The Beryl Institute, 2018 (2019) (DE-627)1760629952 23720247 nnns year:2019 https://doaj.org/article/30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d kostenfrei https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol6/iss3/9 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2372-0247 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2019 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ050990659 (DE-599)DOAJ30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 RA1-1270 Roni Gagin verfasserin aut Patient-initiated second opinions during acute hospital care 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Second opinions are used in medicine in order to make better-informed decisions. Only a few studies have examined patient-initiated second opinions, and even fewer have examined it in the context of acute hospitalization. It is not clear whether patients and families are aware of this right and how often they exercise it during acute hospitalization. The objective of this paper is to identify factors associated with the awareness and utilization of patient-initiated second opinions. A survey was conducted among 92 neurosurgical patients who completed a questionnaire that included information regarding: awareness of second opinion consultations, reasons for not seeking a second opinion, satisfaction from the second opinion and sharing the results of the second opinion with the first physician. Multivariate Logistic Regression analysis was performed to identify potential confounders associated with awareness and seeking a second opinion. Findings revealed that 79% percent of the participants were aware of their right to receive a second opinion; however, only 31% opted to receive a second opinion before/during the hospitalization. Fifty-eight percent received a second opinion related to previous medical conditions. Fifty-four percent did not inform the first physician about the results. The Logistic Regression showed that health insurance, education, religiosity and gender predicted awareness and utilization of second opinions. Current findings indicate that although patients are aware of their right to a second opinion and many have used it in the past, they rarely use it during acute hospitalization. Encouraging health professionals in hospitals to refer their patients to a second opinion as part of shared decision-making, may improve the liability and efficacy of patients' care. <strong<Experience Framework</strong< This article is associated with the Quality & Clinical Excellence lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework. (<a href="http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework"<http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework</a<) <ul< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/PXSEARCH#resource-list-all/?view_28_page=1&view_28_filters=%5B%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_38%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22in%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22PXJ%20Article%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_20%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_40%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%2C%22Quality%20%26%20Clinical%20Excellence%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_41%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%5D"<Access other PXJ articles</a< related to this lens.</li< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/Ecosystem-QualityClinicalExcellence"<Access other resources</a< related to this lens.</li< </ul< patient-initiated second opinions shared decision making patient-centered care physician-patient relationship social work in healthcare health communication Medicine (General) Public aspects of medicine Neta HaGani verfasserin aut Esti Zigelboim verfasserin aut Shiri Shinan-Altman verfasserin aut In Patient Experience Journal The Beryl Institute, 2018 (2019) (DE-627)1760629952 23720247 nnns year:2019 https://doaj.org/article/30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d kostenfrei https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol6/iss3/9 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2372-0247 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2019 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ050990659 (DE-599)DOAJ30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 RA1-1270 Roni Gagin verfasserin aut Patient-initiated second opinions during acute hospital care 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Second opinions are used in medicine in order to make better-informed decisions. Only a few studies have examined patient-initiated second opinions, and even fewer have examined it in the context of acute hospitalization. It is not clear whether patients and families are aware of this right and how often they exercise it during acute hospitalization. The objective of this paper is to identify factors associated with the awareness and utilization of patient-initiated second opinions. A survey was conducted among 92 neurosurgical patients who completed a questionnaire that included information regarding: awareness of second opinion consultations, reasons for not seeking a second opinion, satisfaction from the second opinion and sharing the results of the second opinion with the first physician. Multivariate Logistic Regression analysis was performed to identify potential confounders associated with awareness and seeking a second opinion. Findings revealed that 79% percent of the participants were aware of their right to receive a second opinion; however, only 31% opted to receive a second opinion before/during the hospitalization. Fifty-eight percent received a second opinion related to previous medical conditions. Fifty-four percent did not inform the first physician about the results. The Logistic Regression showed that health insurance, education, religiosity and gender predicted awareness and utilization of second opinions. Current findings indicate that although patients are aware of their right to a second opinion and many have used it in the past, they rarely use it during acute hospitalization. Encouraging health professionals in hospitals to refer their patients to a second opinion as part of shared decision-making, may improve the liability and efficacy of patients' care. <strong<Experience Framework</strong< This article is associated with the Quality & Clinical Excellence lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework. (<a href="http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework"<http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework</a<) <ul< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/PXSEARCH#resource-list-all/?view_28_page=1&view_28_filters=%5B%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_38%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22in%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22PXJ%20Article%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_20%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_40%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%2C%22Quality%20%26%20Clinical%20Excellence%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_41%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%5D"<Access other PXJ articles</a< related to this lens.</li< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/Ecosystem-QualityClinicalExcellence"<Access other resources</a< related to this lens.</li< </ul< patient-initiated second opinions shared decision making patient-centered care physician-patient relationship social work in healthcare health communication Medicine (General) Public aspects of medicine Neta HaGani verfasserin aut Esti Zigelboim verfasserin aut Shiri Shinan-Altman verfasserin aut In Patient Experience Journal The Beryl Institute, 2018 (2019) (DE-627)1760629952 23720247 nnns year:2019 https://doaj.org/article/30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d kostenfrei https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol6/iss3/9 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2372-0247 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2019 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ050990659 (DE-599)DOAJ30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 RA1-1270 Roni Gagin verfasserin aut Patient-initiated second opinions during acute hospital care 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Second opinions are used in medicine in order to make better-informed decisions. Only a few studies have examined patient-initiated second opinions, and even fewer have examined it in the context of acute hospitalization. It is not clear whether patients and families are aware of this right and how often they exercise it during acute hospitalization. The objective of this paper is to identify factors associated with the awareness and utilization of patient-initiated second opinions. A survey was conducted among 92 neurosurgical patients who completed a questionnaire that included information regarding: awareness of second opinion consultations, reasons for not seeking a second opinion, satisfaction from the second opinion and sharing the results of the second opinion with the first physician. Multivariate Logistic Regression analysis was performed to identify potential confounders associated with awareness and seeking a second opinion. Findings revealed that 79% percent of the participants were aware of their right to receive a second opinion; however, only 31% opted to receive a second opinion before/during the hospitalization. Fifty-eight percent received a second opinion related to previous medical conditions. Fifty-four percent did not inform the first physician about the results. The Logistic Regression showed that health insurance, education, religiosity and gender predicted awareness and utilization of second opinions. Current findings indicate that although patients are aware of their right to a second opinion and many have used it in the past, they rarely use it during acute hospitalization. Encouraging health professionals in hospitals to refer their patients to a second opinion as part of shared decision-making, may improve the liability and efficacy of patients' care. <strong<Experience Framework</strong< This article is associated with the Quality & Clinical Excellence lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework. (<a href="http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework"<http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework</a<) <ul< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/PXSEARCH#resource-list-all/?view_28_page=1&view_28_filters=%5B%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_38%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22in%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22PXJ%20Article%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_20%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_40%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%2C%22Quality%20%26%20Clinical%20Excellence%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_41%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%5D"<Access other PXJ articles</a< related to this lens.</li< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/Ecosystem-QualityClinicalExcellence"<Access other resources</a< related to this lens.</li< </ul< patient-initiated second opinions shared decision making patient-centered care physician-patient relationship social work in healthcare health communication Medicine (General) Public aspects of medicine Neta HaGani verfasserin aut Esti Zigelboim verfasserin aut Shiri Shinan-Altman verfasserin aut In Patient Experience Journal The Beryl Institute, 2018 (2019) (DE-627)1760629952 23720247 nnns year:2019 https://doaj.org/article/30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d kostenfrei https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol6/iss3/9 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2372-0247 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2019 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Patient Experience Journal (2019) year:2019 |
| sourceStr |
In Patient Experience Journal (2019) year:2019 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
patient-initiated second opinions shared decision making patient-centered care physician-patient relationship social work in healthcare health communication Medicine (General) Public aspects of medicine |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Patient Experience Journal |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Roni Gagin @@aut@@ Neta HaGani @@aut@@ Esti Zigelboim @@aut@@ Shiri Shinan-Altman @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760629952 |
| id |
DOAJ050990659 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ050990659</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308155708.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ050990659</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R5-920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RA1-1270</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roni Gagin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Patient-initiated second opinions during acute hospital care</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Second opinions are used in medicine in order to make better-informed decisions. Only a few studies have examined patient-initiated second opinions, and even fewer have examined it in the context of acute hospitalization. It is not clear whether patients and families are aware of this right and how often they exercise it during acute hospitalization. The objective of this paper is to identify factors associated with the awareness and utilization of patient-initiated second opinions. A survey was conducted among 92 neurosurgical patients who completed a questionnaire that included information regarding: awareness of second opinion consultations, reasons for not seeking a second opinion, satisfaction from the second opinion and sharing the results of the second opinion with the first physician. Multivariate Logistic Regression analysis was performed to identify potential confounders associated with awareness and seeking a second opinion. Findings revealed that 79% percent of the participants were aware of their right to receive a second opinion; however, only 31% opted to receive a second opinion before/during the hospitalization. Fifty-eight percent received a second opinion related to previous medical conditions. Fifty-four percent did not inform the first physician about the results. The Logistic Regression showed that health insurance, education, religiosity and gender predicted awareness and utilization of second opinions. Current findings indicate that although patients are aware of their right to a second opinion and many have used it in the past, they rarely use it during acute hospitalization. Encouraging health professionals in hospitals to refer their patients to a second opinion as part of shared decision-making, may improve the liability and efficacy of patients' care. <strong<Experience Framework</strong< This article is associated with the Quality & Clinical Excellence lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework. (<a href="http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework"<http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework</a<) <ul< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/PXSEARCH#resource-list-all/?view_28_page=1&view_28_filters=%5B%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_38%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22in%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22PXJ%20Article%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_20%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_40%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%2C%22Quality%20%26%20Clinical%20Excellence%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_41%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%5D"<Access other PXJ articles</a< related to this lens.</li< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/Ecosystem-QualityClinicalExcellence"<Access other resources</a< related to this lens.</li< </ul<</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient-initiated second opinions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">shared decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient-centered care</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">physician-patient relationship</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">social work in healthcare</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">health communication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Public aspects of medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Neta HaGani</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Esti Zigelboim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shiri Shinan-Altman</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Patient Experience Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">The Beryl Institute, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">(2019)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760629952</subfield><subfield code="x">23720247</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol6/iss3/9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2372-0247</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2019</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
| author |
Roni Gagin |
| spellingShingle |
Roni Gagin misc R5-920 misc RA1-1270 misc patient-initiated second opinions misc shared decision making misc patient-centered care misc physician-patient relationship misc social work in healthcare misc health communication misc Medicine (General) misc Public aspects of medicine Patient-initiated second opinions during acute hospital care |
| authorStr |
Roni Gagin |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760629952 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
R5-920 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
23720247 |
| topic_title |
R5-920 RA1-1270 Patient-initiated second opinions during acute hospital care patient-initiated second opinions shared decision making patient-centered care physician-patient relationship social work in healthcare health communication |
| topic |
misc R5-920 misc RA1-1270 misc patient-initiated second opinions misc shared decision making misc patient-centered care misc physician-patient relationship misc social work in healthcare misc health communication misc Medicine (General) misc Public aspects of medicine |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc R5-920 misc RA1-1270 misc patient-initiated second opinions misc shared decision making misc patient-centered care misc physician-patient relationship misc social work in healthcare misc health communication misc Medicine (General) misc Public aspects of medicine |
| topic_browse |
misc R5-920 misc RA1-1270 misc patient-initiated second opinions misc shared decision making misc patient-centered care misc physician-patient relationship misc social work in healthcare misc health communication misc Medicine (General) misc Public aspects of medicine |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Patient Experience Journal |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760629952 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Patient Experience Journal |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760629952 |
| title |
Patient-initiated second opinions during acute hospital care |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ050990659 (DE-599)DOAJ30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d |
| title_full |
Patient-initiated second opinions during acute hospital care |
| author_sort |
Roni Gagin |
| journal |
Patient Experience Journal |
| journalStr |
Patient Experience Journal |
| callnumber-first-code |
R |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Roni Gagin Neta HaGani Esti Zigelboim Shiri Shinan-Altman |
| class |
R5-920 RA1-1270 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Roni Gagin |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
patient-initiated second opinions during acute hospital care |
| callnumber |
R5-920 |
| title_auth |
Patient-initiated second opinions during acute hospital care |
| abstract |
Second opinions are used in medicine in order to make better-informed decisions. Only a few studies have examined patient-initiated second opinions, and even fewer have examined it in the context of acute hospitalization. It is not clear whether patients and families are aware of this right and how often they exercise it during acute hospitalization. The objective of this paper is to identify factors associated with the awareness and utilization of patient-initiated second opinions. A survey was conducted among 92 neurosurgical patients who completed a questionnaire that included information regarding: awareness of second opinion consultations, reasons for not seeking a second opinion, satisfaction from the second opinion and sharing the results of the second opinion with the first physician. Multivariate Logistic Regression analysis was performed to identify potential confounders associated with awareness and seeking a second opinion. Findings revealed that 79% percent of the participants were aware of their right to receive a second opinion; however, only 31% opted to receive a second opinion before/during the hospitalization. Fifty-eight percent received a second opinion related to previous medical conditions. Fifty-four percent did not inform the first physician about the results. The Logistic Regression showed that health insurance, education, religiosity and gender predicted awareness and utilization of second opinions. Current findings indicate that although patients are aware of their right to a second opinion and many have used it in the past, they rarely use it during acute hospitalization. Encouraging health professionals in hospitals to refer their patients to a second opinion as part of shared decision-making, may improve the liability and efficacy of patients' care. <strong<Experience Framework</strong< This article is associated with the Quality & Clinical Excellence lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework. (<a href="http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework"<http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework</a<) <ul< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/PXSEARCH#resource-list-all/?view_28_page=1&view_28_filters=%5B%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_38%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22in%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22PXJ%20Article%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_20%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_40%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%2C%22Quality%20%26%20Clinical%20Excellence%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_41%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%5D"<Access other PXJ articles</a< related to this lens.</li< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/Ecosystem-QualityClinicalExcellence"<Access other resources</a< related to this lens.</li< </ul< |
| abstractGer |
Second opinions are used in medicine in order to make better-informed decisions. Only a few studies have examined patient-initiated second opinions, and even fewer have examined it in the context of acute hospitalization. It is not clear whether patients and families are aware of this right and how often they exercise it during acute hospitalization. The objective of this paper is to identify factors associated with the awareness and utilization of patient-initiated second opinions. A survey was conducted among 92 neurosurgical patients who completed a questionnaire that included information regarding: awareness of second opinion consultations, reasons for not seeking a second opinion, satisfaction from the second opinion and sharing the results of the second opinion with the first physician. Multivariate Logistic Regression analysis was performed to identify potential confounders associated with awareness and seeking a second opinion. Findings revealed that 79% percent of the participants were aware of their right to receive a second opinion; however, only 31% opted to receive a second opinion before/during the hospitalization. Fifty-eight percent received a second opinion related to previous medical conditions. Fifty-four percent did not inform the first physician about the results. The Logistic Regression showed that health insurance, education, religiosity and gender predicted awareness and utilization of second opinions. Current findings indicate that although patients are aware of their right to a second opinion and many have used it in the past, they rarely use it during acute hospitalization. Encouraging health professionals in hospitals to refer their patients to a second opinion as part of shared decision-making, may improve the liability and efficacy of patients' care. <strong<Experience Framework</strong< This article is associated with the Quality & Clinical Excellence lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework. (<a href="http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework"<http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework</a<) <ul< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/PXSEARCH#resource-list-all/?view_28_page=1&view_28_filters=%5B%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_38%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22in%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22PXJ%20Article%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_20%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_40%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%2C%22Quality%20%26%20Clinical%20Excellence%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_41%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%5D"<Access other PXJ articles</a< related to this lens.</li< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/Ecosystem-QualityClinicalExcellence"<Access other resources</a< related to this lens.</li< </ul< |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Second opinions are used in medicine in order to make better-informed decisions. Only a few studies have examined patient-initiated second opinions, and even fewer have examined it in the context of acute hospitalization. It is not clear whether patients and families are aware of this right and how often they exercise it during acute hospitalization. The objective of this paper is to identify factors associated with the awareness and utilization of patient-initiated second opinions. A survey was conducted among 92 neurosurgical patients who completed a questionnaire that included information regarding: awareness of second opinion consultations, reasons for not seeking a second opinion, satisfaction from the second opinion and sharing the results of the second opinion with the first physician. Multivariate Logistic Regression analysis was performed to identify potential confounders associated with awareness and seeking a second opinion. Findings revealed that 79% percent of the participants were aware of their right to receive a second opinion; however, only 31% opted to receive a second opinion before/during the hospitalization. Fifty-eight percent received a second opinion related to previous medical conditions. Fifty-four percent did not inform the first physician about the results. The Logistic Regression showed that health insurance, education, religiosity and gender predicted awareness and utilization of second opinions. Current findings indicate that although patients are aware of their right to a second opinion and many have used it in the past, they rarely use it during acute hospitalization. Encouraging health professionals in hospitals to refer their patients to a second opinion as part of shared decision-making, may improve the liability and efficacy of patients' care. <strong<Experience Framework</strong< This article is associated with the Quality & Clinical Excellence lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework. (<a href="http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework"<http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework</a<) <ul< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/PXSEARCH#resource-list-all/?view_28_page=1&view_28_filters=%5B%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_38%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22in%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22PXJ%20Article%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_20%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_40%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%2C%22Quality%20%26%20Clinical%20Excellence%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_41%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%5D"<Access other PXJ articles</a< related to this lens.</li< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/Ecosystem-QualityClinicalExcellence"<Access other resources</a< related to this lens.</li< </ul< |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| title_short |
Patient-initiated second opinions during acute hospital care |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol6/iss3/9 https://doaj.org/toc/2372-0247 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Neta HaGani Esti Zigelboim Shiri Shinan-Altman |
| author2Str |
Neta HaGani Esti Zigelboim Shiri Shinan-Altman |
| ppnlink |
1760629952 |
| callnumber-subject |
R - General Medicine |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| callnumber-a |
R5-920 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T17:50:50.938Z |
| _version_ |
1803581182121607168 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ050990659</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308155708.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ050990659</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R5-920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RA1-1270</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roni Gagin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Patient-initiated second opinions during acute hospital care</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Second opinions are used in medicine in order to make better-informed decisions. Only a few studies have examined patient-initiated second opinions, and even fewer have examined it in the context of acute hospitalization. It is not clear whether patients and families are aware of this right and how often they exercise it during acute hospitalization. The objective of this paper is to identify factors associated with the awareness and utilization of patient-initiated second opinions. A survey was conducted among 92 neurosurgical patients who completed a questionnaire that included information regarding: awareness of second opinion consultations, reasons for not seeking a second opinion, satisfaction from the second opinion and sharing the results of the second opinion with the first physician. Multivariate Logistic Regression analysis was performed to identify potential confounders associated with awareness and seeking a second opinion. Findings revealed that 79% percent of the participants were aware of their right to receive a second opinion; however, only 31% opted to receive a second opinion before/during the hospitalization. Fifty-eight percent received a second opinion related to previous medical conditions. Fifty-four percent did not inform the first physician about the results. The Logistic Regression showed that health insurance, education, religiosity and gender predicted awareness and utilization of second opinions. Current findings indicate that although patients are aware of their right to a second opinion and many have used it in the past, they rarely use it during acute hospitalization. Encouraging health professionals in hospitals to refer their patients to a second opinion as part of shared decision-making, may improve the liability and efficacy of patients' care. <strong<Experience Framework</strong< This article is associated with the Quality & Clinical Excellence lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework. (<a href="http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework"<http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework</a<) <ul< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/PXSEARCH#resource-list-all/?view_28_page=1&view_28_filters=%5B%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_38%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22in%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22PXJ%20Article%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_20%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_40%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%2C%22Quality%20%26%20Clinical%20Excellence%22%5D%7D%2C%7B%22field%22%3A%22field_41%22%2C%22operator%22%3A%22is%22%2C%22value%22%3A%5B%22%22%5D%7D%5D"<Access other PXJ articles</a< related to this lens.</li< <li<<a href="https://www.theberylinstitute.org/page/Ecosystem-QualityClinicalExcellence"<Access other resources</a< related to this lens.</li< </ul<</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient-initiated second opinions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">shared decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient-centered care</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">physician-patient relationship</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">social work in healthcare</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">health communication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Public aspects of medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Neta HaGani</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Esti Zigelboim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shiri Shinan-Altman</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Patient Experience Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">The Beryl Institute, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">(2019)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760629952</subfield><subfield code="x">23720247</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/30f4d228f449442a869e474ebf81dc6d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol6/iss3/9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2372-0247</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2019</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4011545 |