Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study

Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. Ho...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Laura Gil-Carrera [verfasserIn] Guillermo Pelaz [verfasserIn] Raúl Mateos [verfasserIn] Adrián Escapa [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2020

Schlagwörter:	microbial electrolysis cell carbon footprint greenhouse gas wastewater treatment plant hydrogen production domestic wastewater.

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems - SDEWES Centre, 2013, 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:8 ; year:2020 ; number:3 ; pages:537-546

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ051310872

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ051310872
003	DE-627
005	20230308160937.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ051310872
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a HD72-88
100	0		\|a Laura Gil-Carrera \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study
264		1	\|c 2020
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants.
650		4	\|a microbial electrolysis cell
650		4	\|a carbon footprint
650		4	\|a greenhouse gas
650		4	\|a wastewater treatment plant
650		4	\|a hydrogen production
650		4	\|a domestic wastewater.
653		0	\|a Technology
653		0	\|a T
653		0	\|a Economic growth, development, planning
700	0		\|a Guillermo Pelaz \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Raúl Mateos \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Adrián Escapa \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems \|d SDEWES Centre, 2013 \|g 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 \|w (DE-627)766477541 \|w (DE-600)2730778-5 \|x 18489257 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:8 \|g year:2020 \|g number:3 \|g pages:537-546
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 8 \|j 2020 \|e 3 \|h 537-546

Indexfelder

author_variant	l g c lgc g p gp r m rm a e ae
matchkey_str	article:18489257:2020----::siaighcrofopitfirbaeetoyiclsnatwtr
hierarchy_sort_str	2020
callnumber-subject-code	HD
publishDate	2020
allfields	10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 doi (DE-627)DOAJ051310872 (DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HD72-88 Laura Gil-Carrera verfasserin aut Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants. microbial electrolysis cell carbon footprint greenhouse gas wastewater treatment plant hydrogen production domestic wastewater. Technology T Economic growth, development, planning Guillermo Pelaz verfasserin aut Raúl Mateos verfasserin aut Adrián Escapa verfasserin aut In Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems SDEWES Centre, 2013 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 (DE-627)766477541 (DE-600)2730778-5 18489257 nnns volume:8 year:2020 number:3 pages:537-546 https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 kostenfrei http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2020 3 537-546
spelling	10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 doi (DE-627)DOAJ051310872 (DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HD72-88 Laura Gil-Carrera verfasserin aut Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants. microbial electrolysis cell carbon footprint greenhouse gas wastewater treatment plant hydrogen production domestic wastewater. Technology T Economic growth, development, planning Guillermo Pelaz verfasserin aut Raúl Mateos verfasserin aut Adrián Escapa verfasserin aut In Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems SDEWES Centre, 2013 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 (DE-627)766477541 (DE-600)2730778-5 18489257 nnns volume:8 year:2020 number:3 pages:537-546 https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 kostenfrei http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2020 3 537-546
allfields_unstemmed	10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 doi (DE-627)DOAJ051310872 (DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HD72-88 Laura Gil-Carrera verfasserin aut Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants. microbial electrolysis cell carbon footprint greenhouse gas wastewater treatment plant hydrogen production domestic wastewater. Technology T Economic growth, development, planning Guillermo Pelaz verfasserin aut Raúl Mateos verfasserin aut Adrián Escapa verfasserin aut In Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems SDEWES Centre, 2013 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 (DE-627)766477541 (DE-600)2730778-5 18489257 nnns volume:8 year:2020 number:3 pages:537-546 https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 kostenfrei http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2020 3 537-546
allfieldsGer	10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 doi (DE-627)DOAJ051310872 (DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HD72-88 Laura Gil-Carrera verfasserin aut Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants. microbial electrolysis cell carbon footprint greenhouse gas wastewater treatment plant hydrogen production domestic wastewater. Technology T Economic growth, development, planning Guillermo Pelaz verfasserin aut Raúl Mateos verfasserin aut Adrián Escapa verfasserin aut In Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems SDEWES Centre, 2013 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 (DE-627)766477541 (DE-600)2730778-5 18489257 nnns volume:8 year:2020 number:3 pages:537-546 https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 kostenfrei http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2020 3 537-546
allfieldsSound	10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 doi (DE-627)DOAJ051310872 (DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HD72-88 Laura Gil-Carrera verfasserin aut Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants. microbial electrolysis cell carbon footprint greenhouse gas wastewater treatment plant hydrogen production domestic wastewater. Technology T Economic growth, development, planning Guillermo Pelaz verfasserin aut Raúl Mateos verfasserin aut Adrián Escapa verfasserin aut In Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems SDEWES Centre, 2013 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 (DE-627)766477541 (DE-600)2730778-5 18489257 nnns volume:8 year:2020 number:3 pages:537-546 https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 kostenfrei http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2020 3 537-546
language	English
source	In Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 volume:8 year:2020 number:3 pages:537-546
sourceStr	In Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 volume:8 year:2020 number:3 pages:537-546
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	microbial electrolysis cell carbon footprint greenhouse gas wastewater treatment plant hydrogen production domestic wastewater. Technology T Economic growth, development, planning
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Laura Gil-Carrera @@aut@@ Guillermo Pelaz @@aut@@ Raúl Mateos @@aut@@ Adrián Escapa @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	766477541
id	DOAJ051310872
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ051310872</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308160937.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ051310872</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HD72-88</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laura Gil-Carrera</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">microbial electrolysis cell</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">carbon footprint</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">greenhouse gas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">wastewater treatment plant</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hydrogen production</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">domestic wastewater.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Economic growth, development, planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guillermo Pelaz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Raúl Mateos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Adrián Escapa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems</subfield><subfield code="d">SDEWES Centre, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)766477541</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2730778-5</subfield><subfield code="x">18489257</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:537-546</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">537-546</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	H - Social Science
author	Laura Gil-Carrera
spellingShingle	Laura Gil-Carrera misc HD72-88 misc microbial electrolysis cell misc carbon footprint misc greenhouse gas misc wastewater treatment plant misc hydrogen production misc domestic wastewater. misc Technology misc T misc Economic growth, development, planning Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study
authorStr	Laura Gil-Carrera
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)766477541
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	HD72-88
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	18489257
topic_title	HD72-88 Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study microbial electrolysis cell carbon footprint greenhouse gas wastewater treatment plant hydrogen production domestic wastewater
topic	misc HD72-88 misc microbial electrolysis cell misc carbon footprint misc greenhouse gas misc wastewater treatment plant misc hydrogen production misc domestic wastewater. misc Technology misc T misc Economic growth, development, planning
topic_unstemmed	misc HD72-88 misc microbial electrolysis cell misc carbon footprint misc greenhouse gas misc wastewater treatment plant misc hydrogen production misc domestic wastewater. misc Technology misc T misc Economic growth, development, planning
topic_browse	misc HD72-88 misc microbial electrolysis cell misc carbon footprint misc greenhouse gas misc wastewater treatment plant misc hydrogen production misc domestic wastewater. misc Technology misc T misc Economic growth, development, planning
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems
hierarchy_parent_id	766477541
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)766477541 (DE-600)2730778-5
title	Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ051310872 (DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8
title_full	Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study
author_sort	Laura Gil-Carrera
journal	Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems
journalStr	Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems
callnumber-first-code	H
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2020
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	537
author_browse	Laura Gil-Carrera Guillermo Pelaz Raúl Mateos Adrián Escapa
container_volume	8
class	HD72-88
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Laura Gil-Carrera
doi_str_mv	10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	estimating the carbon footprint of microbial electrolysis cells in wastewater treatment plants: case study
callnumber	HD72-88
title_auth	Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study
abstract	Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants.
abstractGer	Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants.
abstract_unstemmed	Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	3
title_short	Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study
url	https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296 https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257
remote_bool	true
author2	Guillermo Pelaz Raúl Mateos Adrián Escapa
author2Str	Guillermo Pelaz Raúl Mateos Adrián Escapa
ppnlink	766477541
callnumber-subject	HD - Industries, Land Use, Labor
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296
callnumber-a	HD72-88
up_date	2024-07-03T19:36:54.025Z
_version_	1803587854298775552
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ051310872</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308160937.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ051310872</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HD72-88</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laura Gil-Carrera</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">microbial electrolysis cell</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">carbon footprint</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">greenhouse gas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">wastewater treatment plant</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hydrogen production</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">domestic wastewater.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Economic growth, development, planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guillermo Pelaz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Raúl Mateos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Adrián Escapa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems</subfield><subfield code="d">SDEWES Centre, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)766477541</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2730778-5</subfield><subfield code="x">18489257</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:537-546</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">537-546</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3999805

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?