Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study
Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. Ho...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Laura Gil-Carrera [verfasserIn] Guillermo Pelaz [verfasserIn] Raúl Mateos [verfasserIn] Adrián Escapa [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2020 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems - SDEWES Centre, 2013, 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:8 ; year:2020 ; number:3 ; pages:537-546 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ051310872 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ051310872 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230308160937.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ051310872 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a HD72-88 | |
100 | 0 | |a Laura Gil-Carrera |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants. | ||
650 | 4 | |a microbial electrolysis cell | |
650 | 4 | |a carbon footprint | |
650 | 4 | |a greenhouse gas | |
650 | 4 | |a wastewater treatment plant | |
650 | 4 | |a hydrogen production | |
650 | 4 | |a domestic wastewater. | |
653 | 0 | |a Technology | |
653 | 0 | |a T | |
653 | 0 | |a Economic growth, development, planning | |
700 | 0 | |a Guillermo Pelaz |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Raúl Mateos |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Adrián Escapa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems |d SDEWES Centre, 2013 |g 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 |w (DE-627)766477541 |w (DE-600)2730778-5 |x 18489257 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2020 |g number:3 |g pages:537-546 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 8 |j 2020 |e 3 |h 537-546 |
author_variant |
l g c lgc g p gp r m rm a e ae |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:18489257:2020----::siaighcrofopitfirbaeetoyiclsnatwtr |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
callnumber-subject-code |
HD |
publishDate |
2020 |
allfields |
10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 doi (DE-627)DOAJ051310872 (DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HD72-88 Laura Gil-Carrera verfasserin aut Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants. microbial electrolysis cell carbon footprint greenhouse gas wastewater treatment plant hydrogen production domestic wastewater. Technology T Economic growth, development, planning Guillermo Pelaz verfasserin aut Raúl Mateos verfasserin aut Adrián Escapa verfasserin aut In Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems SDEWES Centre, 2013 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 (DE-627)766477541 (DE-600)2730778-5 18489257 nnns volume:8 year:2020 number:3 pages:537-546 https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 kostenfrei http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2020 3 537-546 |
spelling |
10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 doi (DE-627)DOAJ051310872 (DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HD72-88 Laura Gil-Carrera verfasserin aut Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants. microbial electrolysis cell carbon footprint greenhouse gas wastewater treatment plant hydrogen production domestic wastewater. Technology T Economic growth, development, planning Guillermo Pelaz verfasserin aut Raúl Mateos verfasserin aut Adrián Escapa verfasserin aut In Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems SDEWES Centre, 2013 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 (DE-627)766477541 (DE-600)2730778-5 18489257 nnns volume:8 year:2020 number:3 pages:537-546 https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 kostenfrei http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2020 3 537-546 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 doi (DE-627)DOAJ051310872 (DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HD72-88 Laura Gil-Carrera verfasserin aut Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants. microbial electrolysis cell carbon footprint greenhouse gas wastewater treatment plant hydrogen production domestic wastewater. Technology T Economic growth, development, planning Guillermo Pelaz verfasserin aut Raúl Mateos verfasserin aut Adrián Escapa verfasserin aut In Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems SDEWES Centre, 2013 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 (DE-627)766477541 (DE-600)2730778-5 18489257 nnns volume:8 year:2020 number:3 pages:537-546 https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 kostenfrei http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2020 3 537-546 |
allfieldsGer |
10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 doi (DE-627)DOAJ051310872 (DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HD72-88 Laura Gil-Carrera verfasserin aut Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants. microbial electrolysis cell carbon footprint greenhouse gas wastewater treatment plant hydrogen production domestic wastewater. Technology T Economic growth, development, planning Guillermo Pelaz verfasserin aut Raúl Mateos verfasserin aut Adrián Escapa verfasserin aut In Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems SDEWES Centre, 2013 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 (DE-627)766477541 (DE-600)2730778-5 18489257 nnns volume:8 year:2020 number:3 pages:537-546 https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 kostenfrei http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2020 3 537-546 |
allfieldsSound |
10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 doi (DE-627)DOAJ051310872 (DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HD72-88 Laura Gil-Carrera verfasserin aut Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants. microbial electrolysis cell carbon footprint greenhouse gas wastewater treatment plant hydrogen production domestic wastewater. Technology T Economic growth, development, planning Guillermo Pelaz verfasserin aut Raúl Mateos verfasserin aut Adrián Escapa verfasserin aut In Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems SDEWES Centre, 2013 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 (DE-627)766477541 (DE-600)2730778-5 18489257 nnns volume:8 year:2020 number:3 pages:537-546 https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 kostenfrei http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2020 3 537-546 |
language |
English |
source |
In Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 volume:8 year:2020 number:3 pages:537-546 |
sourceStr |
In Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems 8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546 volume:8 year:2020 number:3 pages:537-546 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
microbial electrolysis cell carbon footprint greenhouse gas wastewater treatment plant hydrogen production domestic wastewater. Technology T Economic growth, development, planning |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Laura Gil-Carrera @@aut@@ Guillermo Pelaz @@aut@@ Raúl Mateos @@aut@@ Adrián Escapa @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
766477541 |
id |
DOAJ051310872 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ051310872</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308160937.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ051310872</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HD72-88</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laura Gil-Carrera</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">microbial electrolysis cell</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">carbon footprint</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">greenhouse gas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">wastewater treatment plant</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hydrogen production</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">domestic wastewater.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Economic growth, development, planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guillermo Pelaz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Raúl Mateos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Adrián Escapa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems</subfield><subfield code="d">SDEWES Centre, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)766477541</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2730778-5</subfield><subfield code="x">18489257</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:537-546</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">537-546</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
H - Social Science |
author |
Laura Gil-Carrera |
spellingShingle |
Laura Gil-Carrera misc HD72-88 misc microbial electrolysis cell misc carbon footprint misc greenhouse gas misc wastewater treatment plant misc hydrogen production misc domestic wastewater. misc Technology misc T misc Economic growth, development, planning Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study |
authorStr |
Laura Gil-Carrera |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)766477541 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
HD72-88 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
18489257 |
topic_title |
HD72-88 Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study microbial electrolysis cell carbon footprint greenhouse gas wastewater treatment plant hydrogen production domestic wastewater |
topic |
misc HD72-88 misc microbial electrolysis cell misc carbon footprint misc greenhouse gas misc wastewater treatment plant misc hydrogen production misc domestic wastewater. misc Technology misc T misc Economic growth, development, planning |
topic_unstemmed |
misc HD72-88 misc microbial electrolysis cell misc carbon footprint misc greenhouse gas misc wastewater treatment plant misc hydrogen production misc domestic wastewater. misc Technology misc T misc Economic growth, development, planning |
topic_browse |
misc HD72-88 misc microbial electrolysis cell misc carbon footprint misc greenhouse gas misc wastewater treatment plant misc hydrogen production misc domestic wastewater. misc Technology misc T misc Economic growth, development, planning |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems |
hierarchy_parent_id |
766477541 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)766477541 (DE-600)2730778-5 |
title |
Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ051310872 (DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 |
title_full |
Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study |
author_sort |
Laura Gil-Carrera |
journal |
Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems |
journalStr |
Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems |
callnumber-first-code |
H |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2020 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
537 |
author_browse |
Laura Gil-Carrera Guillermo Pelaz Raúl Mateos Adrián Escapa |
container_volume |
8 |
class |
HD72-88 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Laura Gil-Carrera |
doi_str_mv |
10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
estimating the carbon footprint of microbial electrolysis cells in wastewater treatment plants: case study |
callnumber |
HD72-88 |
title_auth |
Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study |
abstract |
Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants. |
abstractGer |
Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
3 |
title_short |
Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study |
url |
https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8 http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296 https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Guillermo Pelaz Raúl Mateos Adrián Escapa |
author2Str |
Guillermo Pelaz Raúl Mateos Adrián Escapa |
ppnlink |
766477541 |
callnumber-subject |
HD - Industries, Land Use, Labor |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296 |
callnumber-a |
HD72-88 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T19:36:54.025Z |
_version_ |
1803587854298775552 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ051310872</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308160937.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ051310872</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HD72-88</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laura Gil-Carrera</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Microbial Electrolysis Cells in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Case Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Microbial Electrolysis Cells are devices capable of converting the organic fraction present in the wastewaters into hydrogen. Integrating this relatively new technology into wastewater treatment plants can improve the energy balance and result in significant savings in greenhouse gases emissions. However, there are not many studies available in the scientific literature on the carbon footprint of these systems. This paper compares carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant located in South Spain, to the carbon footprint of this same plant in which the aerobic treatment is partially replaced by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. The carbon footprint attributed to the construction of the plants was similar in both cases. However, the wastewater treatment plant with the Microbial Electrolysis Cell system would allow mitigating up to 2,700 t CO2-equivalents, which represents a 42% saving in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the existing wastewater treatment plants.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">microbial electrolysis cell</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">carbon footprint</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">greenhouse gas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">wastewater treatment plant</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hydrogen production</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">domestic wastewater.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Economic growth, development, planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guillermo Pelaz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Raúl Mateos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Adrián Escapa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems</subfield><subfield code="d">SDEWES Centre, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2020), 3, Seite 537-546</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)766477541</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2730778-5</subfield><subfield code="x">18489257</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:537-546</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0296</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/49503957baca48e99f8f5704096fcde8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid7.0296</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9257</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">537-546</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3999805 |