ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007
Abstract: This paper aim to analyze the legal implications of legal conflicts between Article 126 paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of UUPT.Article 126 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Company (UUPT) states that the acquisition process should consider the interests of minori...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Maya Sari [verfasserIn] Abdul Rachmad Budiono [verfasserIn] Hanif Nur Widhiyanti [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Indonesisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan - Universitas Negeri Malang, 2017, 2(2017), 2, Seite 115-124 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:2 ; year:2017 ; number:2 ; pages:115-124 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ051889897 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ051889897 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230501184519.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ051889897 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJdd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a ind | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a K1-7720 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a H1-99 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Maya Sari |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract: This paper aim to analyze the legal implications of legal conflicts between Article 126 paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of UUPT.Article 126 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Company (UUPT) states that the acquisition process should consider the interests of minority shareholders. But in article 126 paragraph (3) UUPT that the business undertaken by minority shareholders under Article 62 UUPT does not stop the acquisition process. It appears that the UUPT has not yet provided legal protection for minority shareholders and there is a legal conflict between Article 126 paragraph (1) of the Company Law which wishes to provide legal protection to minority shareholders and paragraph (3) of the article which illustrates that the shareholders' Minorities do not stop the acquisition process. By approach of legislation and case approach, the result is that there is no legal certainty over legal efforts by minority shareholders in using the voting rights in accordance with the shares they hold when the minority shareholders do not approve the acquisition. UUPT has not provided clear legal protection for minority shareholders so that in the process of acquisition of minority shareholders is impaired Abstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum terhadap konflik hukum antara pasal 126 ayat 1 dan ayat 3 dari UUPT. Pasal 126 ayat (1) UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) menyatakan bahwa proses akuisisi harus memperhatikan kepentingan pemegang saham minoritas. Tetapi pada Pasal 126 ayat (3) UUPT tersebut menyatakan bahwa usaha yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas berdasarkan Pasal 62 UUPT tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Terlihat belum konsistennya UUPT memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas dan terlihat adanya konflik hukum antara Pasal 126 ayat (1) UUPT yang ingin memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang saham minoritas dan ayat (3) dari pasal tersebut yang menggambarkan bahwa upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus diperoleh hasil bahwa tidak adanya kepastian hukum atas upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas dalam menggunakan hak suara sesuai dengan saham yang dimilikinya ketika pemegang saham minoritas tidak menyetujui dilakukannya akuisisi. UUPT belum memberikan perlindungan hukum yang jelas bagi pemegang saham minoritas sehingga dalam proses akuisisi pemegang saham minoritas dirugikan DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i22017p115 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a acquisition | |
| 650 | 4 | |a limited liability company | |
| 650 | 4 | |a minority shareholders | |
| 650 | 4 | |a legal protection | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Social sciences (General) | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Abdul Rachmad Budiono |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Hanif Nur Widhiyanti |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan |d Universitas Negeri Malang, 2017 |g 2(2017), 2, Seite 115-124 |w (DE-627)1760636789 |x 25278495 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g year:2017 |g number:2 |g pages:115-124 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/dd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jppk/article/view/2571 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2528-0767 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2527-8495 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 2 |j 2017 |e 2 |h 115-124 | ||
| author_variant |
m s ms a r b arb h n w hnw |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:25278495:2017----::nlspridnahkmaieeagaamnrtsaapoeaussbraaknaa1 |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
K |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ051889897 (DE-599)DOAJdd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ind K1-7720 H1-99 Maya Sari verfasserin aut ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract: This paper aim to analyze the legal implications of legal conflicts between Article 126 paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of UUPT.Article 126 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Company (UUPT) states that the acquisition process should consider the interests of minority shareholders. But in article 126 paragraph (3) UUPT that the business undertaken by minority shareholders under Article 62 UUPT does not stop the acquisition process. It appears that the UUPT has not yet provided legal protection for minority shareholders and there is a legal conflict between Article 126 paragraph (1) of the Company Law which wishes to provide legal protection to minority shareholders and paragraph (3) of the article which illustrates that the shareholders' Minorities do not stop the acquisition process. By approach of legislation and case approach, the result is that there is no legal certainty over legal efforts by minority shareholders in using the voting rights in accordance with the shares they hold when the minority shareholders do not approve the acquisition. UUPT has not provided clear legal protection for minority shareholders so that in the process of acquisition of minority shareholders is impaired Abstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum terhadap konflik hukum antara pasal 126 ayat 1 dan ayat 3 dari UUPT. Pasal 126 ayat (1) UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) menyatakan bahwa proses akuisisi harus memperhatikan kepentingan pemegang saham minoritas. Tetapi pada Pasal 126 ayat (3) UUPT tersebut menyatakan bahwa usaha yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas berdasarkan Pasal 62 UUPT tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Terlihat belum konsistennya UUPT memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas dan terlihat adanya konflik hukum antara Pasal 126 ayat (1) UUPT yang ingin memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang saham minoritas dan ayat (3) dari pasal tersebut yang menggambarkan bahwa upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus diperoleh hasil bahwa tidak adanya kepastian hukum atas upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas dalam menggunakan hak suara sesuai dengan saham yang dimilikinya ketika pemegang saham minoritas tidak menyetujui dilakukannya akuisisi. UUPT belum memberikan perlindungan hukum yang jelas bagi pemegang saham minoritas sehingga dalam proses akuisisi pemegang saham minoritas dirugikan DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i22017p115 acquisition limited liability company minority shareholders legal protection Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence Social sciences (General) Abdul Rachmad Budiono verfasserin aut Hanif Nur Widhiyanti verfasserin aut In Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Universitas Negeri Malang, 2017 2(2017), 2, Seite 115-124 (DE-627)1760636789 25278495 nnns volume:2 year:2017 number:2 pages:115-124 https://doaj.org/article/dd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72 kostenfrei http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jppk/article/view/2571 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2528-0767 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2527-8495 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 2 2017 2 115-124 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ051889897 (DE-599)DOAJdd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ind K1-7720 H1-99 Maya Sari verfasserin aut ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract: This paper aim to analyze the legal implications of legal conflicts between Article 126 paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of UUPT.Article 126 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Company (UUPT) states that the acquisition process should consider the interests of minority shareholders. But in article 126 paragraph (3) UUPT that the business undertaken by minority shareholders under Article 62 UUPT does not stop the acquisition process. It appears that the UUPT has not yet provided legal protection for minority shareholders and there is a legal conflict between Article 126 paragraph (1) of the Company Law which wishes to provide legal protection to minority shareholders and paragraph (3) of the article which illustrates that the shareholders' Minorities do not stop the acquisition process. By approach of legislation and case approach, the result is that there is no legal certainty over legal efforts by minority shareholders in using the voting rights in accordance with the shares they hold when the minority shareholders do not approve the acquisition. UUPT has not provided clear legal protection for minority shareholders so that in the process of acquisition of minority shareholders is impaired Abstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum terhadap konflik hukum antara pasal 126 ayat 1 dan ayat 3 dari UUPT. Pasal 126 ayat (1) UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) menyatakan bahwa proses akuisisi harus memperhatikan kepentingan pemegang saham minoritas. Tetapi pada Pasal 126 ayat (3) UUPT tersebut menyatakan bahwa usaha yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas berdasarkan Pasal 62 UUPT tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Terlihat belum konsistennya UUPT memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas dan terlihat adanya konflik hukum antara Pasal 126 ayat (1) UUPT yang ingin memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang saham minoritas dan ayat (3) dari pasal tersebut yang menggambarkan bahwa upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus diperoleh hasil bahwa tidak adanya kepastian hukum atas upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas dalam menggunakan hak suara sesuai dengan saham yang dimilikinya ketika pemegang saham minoritas tidak menyetujui dilakukannya akuisisi. UUPT belum memberikan perlindungan hukum yang jelas bagi pemegang saham minoritas sehingga dalam proses akuisisi pemegang saham minoritas dirugikan DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i22017p115 acquisition limited liability company minority shareholders legal protection Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence Social sciences (General) Abdul Rachmad Budiono verfasserin aut Hanif Nur Widhiyanti verfasserin aut In Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Universitas Negeri Malang, 2017 2(2017), 2, Seite 115-124 (DE-627)1760636789 25278495 nnns volume:2 year:2017 number:2 pages:115-124 https://doaj.org/article/dd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72 kostenfrei http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jppk/article/view/2571 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2528-0767 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2527-8495 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 2 2017 2 115-124 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ051889897 (DE-599)DOAJdd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ind K1-7720 H1-99 Maya Sari verfasserin aut ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract: This paper aim to analyze the legal implications of legal conflicts between Article 126 paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of UUPT.Article 126 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Company (UUPT) states that the acquisition process should consider the interests of minority shareholders. But in article 126 paragraph (3) UUPT that the business undertaken by minority shareholders under Article 62 UUPT does not stop the acquisition process. It appears that the UUPT has not yet provided legal protection for minority shareholders and there is a legal conflict between Article 126 paragraph (1) of the Company Law which wishes to provide legal protection to minority shareholders and paragraph (3) of the article which illustrates that the shareholders' Minorities do not stop the acquisition process. By approach of legislation and case approach, the result is that there is no legal certainty over legal efforts by minority shareholders in using the voting rights in accordance with the shares they hold when the minority shareholders do not approve the acquisition. UUPT has not provided clear legal protection for minority shareholders so that in the process of acquisition of minority shareholders is impaired Abstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum terhadap konflik hukum antara pasal 126 ayat 1 dan ayat 3 dari UUPT. Pasal 126 ayat (1) UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) menyatakan bahwa proses akuisisi harus memperhatikan kepentingan pemegang saham minoritas. Tetapi pada Pasal 126 ayat (3) UUPT tersebut menyatakan bahwa usaha yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas berdasarkan Pasal 62 UUPT tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Terlihat belum konsistennya UUPT memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas dan terlihat adanya konflik hukum antara Pasal 126 ayat (1) UUPT yang ingin memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang saham minoritas dan ayat (3) dari pasal tersebut yang menggambarkan bahwa upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus diperoleh hasil bahwa tidak adanya kepastian hukum atas upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas dalam menggunakan hak suara sesuai dengan saham yang dimilikinya ketika pemegang saham minoritas tidak menyetujui dilakukannya akuisisi. UUPT belum memberikan perlindungan hukum yang jelas bagi pemegang saham minoritas sehingga dalam proses akuisisi pemegang saham minoritas dirugikan DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i22017p115 acquisition limited liability company minority shareholders legal protection Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence Social sciences (General) Abdul Rachmad Budiono verfasserin aut Hanif Nur Widhiyanti verfasserin aut In Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Universitas Negeri Malang, 2017 2(2017), 2, Seite 115-124 (DE-627)1760636789 25278495 nnns volume:2 year:2017 number:2 pages:115-124 https://doaj.org/article/dd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72 kostenfrei http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jppk/article/view/2571 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2528-0767 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2527-8495 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 2 2017 2 115-124 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ051889897 (DE-599)DOAJdd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ind K1-7720 H1-99 Maya Sari verfasserin aut ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract: This paper aim to analyze the legal implications of legal conflicts between Article 126 paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of UUPT.Article 126 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Company (UUPT) states that the acquisition process should consider the interests of minority shareholders. But in article 126 paragraph (3) UUPT that the business undertaken by minority shareholders under Article 62 UUPT does not stop the acquisition process. It appears that the UUPT has not yet provided legal protection for minority shareholders and there is a legal conflict between Article 126 paragraph (1) of the Company Law which wishes to provide legal protection to minority shareholders and paragraph (3) of the article which illustrates that the shareholders' Minorities do not stop the acquisition process. By approach of legislation and case approach, the result is that there is no legal certainty over legal efforts by minority shareholders in using the voting rights in accordance with the shares they hold when the minority shareholders do not approve the acquisition. UUPT has not provided clear legal protection for minority shareholders so that in the process of acquisition of minority shareholders is impaired Abstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum terhadap konflik hukum antara pasal 126 ayat 1 dan ayat 3 dari UUPT. Pasal 126 ayat (1) UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) menyatakan bahwa proses akuisisi harus memperhatikan kepentingan pemegang saham minoritas. Tetapi pada Pasal 126 ayat (3) UUPT tersebut menyatakan bahwa usaha yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas berdasarkan Pasal 62 UUPT tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Terlihat belum konsistennya UUPT memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas dan terlihat adanya konflik hukum antara Pasal 126 ayat (1) UUPT yang ingin memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang saham minoritas dan ayat (3) dari pasal tersebut yang menggambarkan bahwa upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus diperoleh hasil bahwa tidak adanya kepastian hukum atas upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas dalam menggunakan hak suara sesuai dengan saham yang dimilikinya ketika pemegang saham minoritas tidak menyetujui dilakukannya akuisisi. UUPT belum memberikan perlindungan hukum yang jelas bagi pemegang saham minoritas sehingga dalam proses akuisisi pemegang saham minoritas dirugikan DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i22017p115 acquisition limited liability company minority shareholders legal protection Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence Social sciences (General) Abdul Rachmad Budiono verfasserin aut Hanif Nur Widhiyanti verfasserin aut In Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Universitas Negeri Malang, 2017 2(2017), 2, Seite 115-124 (DE-627)1760636789 25278495 nnns volume:2 year:2017 number:2 pages:115-124 https://doaj.org/article/dd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72 kostenfrei http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jppk/article/view/2571 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2528-0767 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2527-8495 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 2 2017 2 115-124 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ051889897 (DE-599)DOAJdd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng ind K1-7720 H1-99 Maya Sari verfasserin aut ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract: This paper aim to analyze the legal implications of legal conflicts between Article 126 paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of UUPT.Article 126 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Company (UUPT) states that the acquisition process should consider the interests of minority shareholders. But in article 126 paragraph (3) UUPT that the business undertaken by minority shareholders under Article 62 UUPT does not stop the acquisition process. It appears that the UUPT has not yet provided legal protection for minority shareholders and there is a legal conflict between Article 126 paragraph (1) of the Company Law which wishes to provide legal protection to minority shareholders and paragraph (3) of the article which illustrates that the shareholders' Minorities do not stop the acquisition process. By approach of legislation and case approach, the result is that there is no legal certainty over legal efforts by minority shareholders in using the voting rights in accordance with the shares they hold when the minority shareholders do not approve the acquisition. UUPT has not provided clear legal protection for minority shareholders so that in the process of acquisition of minority shareholders is impaired Abstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum terhadap konflik hukum antara pasal 126 ayat 1 dan ayat 3 dari UUPT. Pasal 126 ayat (1) UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) menyatakan bahwa proses akuisisi harus memperhatikan kepentingan pemegang saham minoritas. Tetapi pada Pasal 126 ayat (3) UUPT tersebut menyatakan bahwa usaha yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas berdasarkan Pasal 62 UUPT tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Terlihat belum konsistennya UUPT memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas dan terlihat adanya konflik hukum antara Pasal 126 ayat (1) UUPT yang ingin memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang saham minoritas dan ayat (3) dari pasal tersebut yang menggambarkan bahwa upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus diperoleh hasil bahwa tidak adanya kepastian hukum atas upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas dalam menggunakan hak suara sesuai dengan saham yang dimilikinya ketika pemegang saham minoritas tidak menyetujui dilakukannya akuisisi. UUPT belum memberikan perlindungan hukum yang jelas bagi pemegang saham minoritas sehingga dalam proses akuisisi pemegang saham minoritas dirugikan DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i22017p115 acquisition limited liability company minority shareholders legal protection Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence Social sciences (General) Abdul Rachmad Budiono verfasserin aut Hanif Nur Widhiyanti verfasserin aut In Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Universitas Negeri Malang, 2017 2(2017), 2, Seite 115-124 (DE-627)1760636789 25278495 nnns volume:2 year:2017 number:2 pages:115-124 https://doaj.org/article/dd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72 kostenfrei http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jppk/article/view/2571 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2528-0767 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2527-8495 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 2 2017 2 115-124 |
| language |
English Indonesian |
| source |
In Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan 2(2017), 2, Seite 115-124 volume:2 year:2017 number:2 pages:115-124 |
| sourceStr |
In Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan 2(2017), 2, Seite 115-124 volume:2 year:2017 number:2 pages:115-124 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
acquisition limited liability company minority shareholders legal protection Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence Social sciences (General) |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Maya Sari @@aut@@ Abdul Rachmad Budiono @@aut@@ Hanif Nur Widhiyanti @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760636789 |
| id |
DOAJ051889897 |
| language_de |
englisch Sangiang |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ051889897</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230501184519.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ051889897</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJdd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">ind</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K1-7720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">H1-99</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maya Sari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract: This paper aim to analyze the legal implications of legal conflicts between Article 126 paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of UUPT.Article 126 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Company (UUPT) states that the acquisition process should consider the interests of minority shareholders. But in article 126 paragraph (3) UUPT that the business undertaken by minority shareholders under Article 62 UUPT does not stop the acquisition process. It appears that the UUPT has not yet provided legal protection for minority shareholders and there is a legal conflict between Article 126 paragraph (1) of the Company Law which wishes to provide legal protection to minority shareholders and paragraph (3) of the article which illustrates that the shareholders' Minorities do not stop the acquisition process. By approach of legislation and case approach, the result is that there is no legal certainty over legal efforts by minority shareholders in using the voting rights in accordance with the shares they hold when the minority shareholders do not approve the acquisition. UUPT has not provided clear legal protection for minority shareholders so that in the process of acquisition of minority shareholders is impaired Abstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum terhadap konflik hukum antara pasal 126 ayat 1 dan ayat 3 dari UUPT. Pasal 126 ayat (1) UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) menyatakan bahwa proses akuisisi harus memperhatikan kepentingan pemegang saham minoritas. Tetapi pada Pasal 126 ayat (3) UUPT tersebut menyatakan bahwa usaha yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas berdasarkan Pasal 62 UUPT tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Terlihat belum konsistennya UUPT memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas dan terlihat adanya konflik hukum antara Pasal 126 ayat (1) UUPT yang ingin memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang saham minoritas dan ayat (3) dari pasal tersebut yang menggambarkan bahwa upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus diperoleh hasil bahwa tidak adanya kepastian hukum atas upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas dalam menggunakan hak suara sesuai dengan saham yang dimilikinya ketika pemegang saham minoritas tidak menyetujui dilakukannya akuisisi. UUPT belum memberikan perlindungan hukum yang jelas bagi pemegang saham minoritas sehingga dalam proses akuisisi pemegang saham minoritas dirugikan DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i22017p115</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">acquisition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">limited liability company</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">minority shareholders</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">legal protection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social sciences (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abdul Rachmad Budiono</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hanif Nur Widhiyanti</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan</subfield><subfield code="d">Universitas Negeri Malang, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">2(2017), 2, Seite 115-124</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760636789</subfield><subfield code="x">25278495</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:115-124</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/dd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jppk/article/view/2571</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2528-0767</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2527-8495</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">115-124</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
K - Law |
| author |
Maya Sari |
| spellingShingle |
Maya Sari misc K1-7720 misc H1-99 misc acquisition misc limited liability company misc minority shareholders misc legal protection misc Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence misc Social sciences (General) ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 |
| authorStr |
Maya Sari |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760636789 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
K1-7720 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
25278495 |
| topic_title |
K1-7720 H1-99 ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 acquisition limited liability company minority shareholders legal protection |
| topic |
misc K1-7720 misc H1-99 misc acquisition misc limited liability company misc minority shareholders misc legal protection misc Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence misc Social sciences (General) |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc K1-7720 misc H1-99 misc acquisition misc limited liability company misc minority shareholders misc legal protection misc Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence misc Social sciences (General) |
| topic_browse |
misc K1-7720 misc H1-99 misc acquisition misc limited liability company misc minority shareholders misc legal protection misc Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence misc Social sciences (General) |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760636789 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760636789 |
| title |
ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ051889897 (DE-599)DOAJdd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72 |
| title_full |
ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 |
| author_sort |
Maya Sari |
| journal |
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan |
| journalStr |
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan |
| callnumber-first-code |
K |
| lang_code |
eng ind |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
115 |
| author_browse |
Maya Sari Abdul Rachmad Budiono Hanif Nur Widhiyanti |
| container_volume |
2 |
| class |
K1-7720 H1-99 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Maya Sari |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
analisa perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas dalam proses akuisisi berdasarkan pasal 126 undang-undang nomor 40 tahun 2007 |
| callnumber |
K1-7720 |
| title_auth |
ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 |
| abstract |
Abstract: This paper aim to analyze the legal implications of legal conflicts between Article 126 paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of UUPT.Article 126 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Company (UUPT) states that the acquisition process should consider the interests of minority shareholders. But in article 126 paragraph (3) UUPT that the business undertaken by minority shareholders under Article 62 UUPT does not stop the acquisition process. It appears that the UUPT has not yet provided legal protection for minority shareholders and there is a legal conflict between Article 126 paragraph (1) of the Company Law which wishes to provide legal protection to minority shareholders and paragraph (3) of the article which illustrates that the shareholders' Minorities do not stop the acquisition process. By approach of legislation and case approach, the result is that there is no legal certainty over legal efforts by minority shareholders in using the voting rights in accordance with the shares they hold when the minority shareholders do not approve the acquisition. UUPT has not provided clear legal protection for minority shareholders so that in the process of acquisition of minority shareholders is impaired Abstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum terhadap konflik hukum antara pasal 126 ayat 1 dan ayat 3 dari UUPT. Pasal 126 ayat (1) UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) menyatakan bahwa proses akuisisi harus memperhatikan kepentingan pemegang saham minoritas. Tetapi pada Pasal 126 ayat (3) UUPT tersebut menyatakan bahwa usaha yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas berdasarkan Pasal 62 UUPT tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Terlihat belum konsistennya UUPT memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas dan terlihat adanya konflik hukum antara Pasal 126 ayat (1) UUPT yang ingin memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang saham minoritas dan ayat (3) dari pasal tersebut yang menggambarkan bahwa upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus diperoleh hasil bahwa tidak adanya kepastian hukum atas upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas dalam menggunakan hak suara sesuai dengan saham yang dimilikinya ketika pemegang saham minoritas tidak menyetujui dilakukannya akuisisi. UUPT belum memberikan perlindungan hukum yang jelas bagi pemegang saham minoritas sehingga dalam proses akuisisi pemegang saham minoritas dirugikan DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i22017p115 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract: This paper aim to analyze the legal implications of legal conflicts between Article 126 paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of UUPT.Article 126 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Company (UUPT) states that the acquisition process should consider the interests of minority shareholders. But in article 126 paragraph (3) UUPT that the business undertaken by minority shareholders under Article 62 UUPT does not stop the acquisition process. It appears that the UUPT has not yet provided legal protection for minority shareholders and there is a legal conflict between Article 126 paragraph (1) of the Company Law which wishes to provide legal protection to minority shareholders and paragraph (3) of the article which illustrates that the shareholders' Minorities do not stop the acquisition process. By approach of legislation and case approach, the result is that there is no legal certainty over legal efforts by minority shareholders in using the voting rights in accordance with the shares they hold when the minority shareholders do not approve the acquisition. UUPT has not provided clear legal protection for minority shareholders so that in the process of acquisition of minority shareholders is impaired Abstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum terhadap konflik hukum antara pasal 126 ayat 1 dan ayat 3 dari UUPT. Pasal 126 ayat (1) UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) menyatakan bahwa proses akuisisi harus memperhatikan kepentingan pemegang saham minoritas. Tetapi pada Pasal 126 ayat (3) UUPT tersebut menyatakan bahwa usaha yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas berdasarkan Pasal 62 UUPT tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Terlihat belum konsistennya UUPT memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas dan terlihat adanya konflik hukum antara Pasal 126 ayat (1) UUPT yang ingin memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang saham minoritas dan ayat (3) dari pasal tersebut yang menggambarkan bahwa upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus diperoleh hasil bahwa tidak adanya kepastian hukum atas upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas dalam menggunakan hak suara sesuai dengan saham yang dimilikinya ketika pemegang saham minoritas tidak menyetujui dilakukannya akuisisi. UUPT belum memberikan perlindungan hukum yang jelas bagi pemegang saham minoritas sehingga dalam proses akuisisi pemegang saham minoritas dirugikan DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i22017p115 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract: This paper aim to analyze the legal implications of legal conflicts between Article 126 paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of UUPT.Article 126 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Company (UUPT) states that the acquisition process should consider the interests of minority shareholders. But in article 126 paragraph (3) UUPT that the business undertaken by minority shareholders under Article 62 UUPT does not stop the acquisition process. It appears that the UUPT has not yet provided legal protection for minority shareholders and there is a legal conflict between Article 126 paragraph (1) of the Company Law which wishes to provide legal protection to minority shareholders and paragraph (3) of the article which illustrates that the shareholders' Minorities do not stop the acquisition process. By approach of legislation and case approach, the result is that there is no legal certainty over legal efforts by minority shareholders in using the voting rights in accordance with the shares they hold when the minority shareholders do not approve the acquisition. UUPT has not provided clear legal protection for minority shareholders so that in the process of acquisition of minority shareholders is impaired Abstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum terhadap konflik hukum antara pasal 126 ayat 1 dan ayat 3 dari UUPT. Pasal 126 ayat (1) UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) menyatakan bahwa proses akuisisi harus memperhatikan kepentingan pemegang saham minoritas. Tetapi pada Pasal 126 ayat (3) UUPT tersebut menyatakan bahwa usaha yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas berdasarkan Pasal 62 UUPT tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Terlihat belum konsistennya UUPT memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas dan terlihat adanya konflik hukum antara Pasal 126 ayat (1) UUPT yang ingin memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang saham minoritas dan ayat (3) dari pasal tersebut yang menggambarkan bahwa upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus diperoleh hasil bahwa tidak adanya kepastian hukum atas upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas dalam menggunakan hak suara sesuai dengan saham yang dimilikinya ketika pemegang saham minoritas tidak menyetujui dilakukannya akuisisi. UUPT belum memberikan perlindungan hukum yang jelas bagi pemegang saham minoritas sehingga dalam proses akuisisi pemegang saham minoritas dirugikan DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i22017p115 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/dd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72 http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jppk/article/view/2571 https://doaj.org/toc/2528-0767 https://doaj.org/toc/2527-8495 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Abdul Rachmad Budiono Hanif Nur Widhiyanti |
| author2Str |
Abdul Rachmad Budiono Hanif Nur Widhiyanti |
| ppnlink |
1760636789 |
| callnumber-subject |
K - General Law |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| callnumber-a |
K1-7720 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T22:46:13.105Z |
| _version_ |
1803599765156397056 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ051889897</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230501184519.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ051889897</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJdd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">ind</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K1-7720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">H1-99</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maya Sari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract: This paper aim to analyze the legal implications of legal conflicts between Article 126 paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of UUPT.Article 126 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Company (UUPT) states that the acquisition process should consider the interests of minority shareholders. But in article 126 paragraph (3) UUPT that the business undertaken by minority shareholders under Article 62 UUPT does not stop the acquisition process. It appears that the UUPT has not yet provided legal protection for minority shareholders and there is a legal conflict between Article 126 paragraph (1) of the Company Law which wishes to provide legal protection to minority shareholders and paragraph (3) of the article which illustrates that the shareholders' Minorities do not stop the acquisition process. By approach of legislation and case approach, the result is that there is no legal certainty over legal efforts by minority shareholders in using the voting rights in accordance with the shares they hold when the minority shareholders do not approve the acquisition. UUPT has not provided clear legal protection for minority shareholders so that in the process of acquisition of minority shareholders is impaired Abstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum terhadap konflik hukum antara pasal 126 ayat 1 dan ayat 3 dari UUPT. Pasal 126 ayat (1) UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) menyatakan bahwa proses akuisisi harus memperhatikan kepentingan pemegang saham minoritas. Tetapi pada Pasal 126 ayat (3) UUPT tersebut menyatakan bahwa usaha yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas berdasarkan Pasal 62 UUPT tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Terlihat belum konsistennya UUPT memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas dan terlihat adanya konflik hukum antara Pasal 126 ayat (1) UUPT yang ingin memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang saham minoritas dan ayat (3) dari pasal tersebut yang menggambarkan bahwa upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus diperoleh hasil bahwa tidak adanya kepastian hukum atas upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas dalam menggunakan hak suara sesuai dengan saham yang dimilikinya ketika pemegang saham minoritas tidak menyetujui dilakukannya akuisisi. UUPT belum memberikan perlindungan hukum yang jelas bagi pemegang saham minoritas sehingga dalam proses akuisisi pemegang saham minoritas dirugikan DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i22017p115</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">acquisition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">limited liability company</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">minority shareholders</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">legal protection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social sciences (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abdul Rachmad Budiono</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hanif Nur Widhiyanti</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan</subfield><subfield code="d">Universitas Negeri Malang, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">2(2017), 2, Seite 115-124</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760636789</subfield><subfield code="x">25278495</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:115-124</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/dd8cb48f5d15425fb4c2783b0f95ba72</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jppk/article/view/2571</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2528-0767</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2527-8495</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">115-124</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4013023 |