The Relationship Between Clinical Trial Participation and Inhaler Technique Errors in Asthma and COPD Patients
Rubeshan Perumal,1 Marcia Leite,2 Richard Nellis van Zyl-Smit1,2 1Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa; 2UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South AfricaCorrespondence: Rubeshan Perumal...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Perumal R [verfasserIn] Leite M [verfasserIn] van Zyl-Smit RN [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2020 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: International Journal of COPD - Dove Medical Press, 2009, (2020), Seite 1217-1224 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2020 ; pages:1217-1224 |
Links: |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ05194250X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ05194250X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230308163454.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ05194250X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a RC705-779 | |
100 | 0 | |a Perumal R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Relationship Between Clinical Trial Participation and Inhaler Technique Errors in Asthma and COPD Patients |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Rubeshan Perumal,1 Marcia Leite,2 Richard Nellis van Zyl-Smit1,2 1Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa; 2UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South AfricaCorrespondence: Rubeshan Perumal Email rubeshanperumalgmail.comBackground: Incorrect inhaler use is associated with poorer health outcomes, reduced quality of life, and higher healthcare utilisation in patients with asthma and COPD.Methods: We performed an observational study of pressurized metered-dose inhaler technique in patients with asthma or COPD. Patients were assessed using a six-point inhaler checklist to identify common critical inhaler technique errors. An inadequate inhaler technique was defined as the presence of one or more critical errors. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the odds of an inadequate inhaler technique.Results: During the 14-month study period, 357 patients were enrolled. At least one critical error was executed by 66.7% of participants, and 24.9% made four or more critical errors. The most common errors were failure to exhale completely prior to pMDI activation and inhalation (49.6%), failure to perform a slow, deep inhalation following device activation (48.7%), and failure to perform a breath-hold at the end of inspiration (47.3%). The risk of a critical error was higher in COPD patients (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.13– 4.47). Prior training reduced error risk specifically when trained by a doctor (aOR 0.08, 95% CI 0.1– 0.57) or a pharmacist (aOR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01– 0.26) compared to those with no training. Previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced error risk and rate: < 3 trials (aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19– 0.66) and ≥ 3 trials (aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07– 0.42). The rate of critical errors was not significantly associated with age, sex, or prior pMDI experience.Conclusion: This study found a high rate of critical inhaler technique errors in a mixed population of asthma and COPD patients; however, prior training and, in particular, multiple previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced the risk of errors.Keywords: inhaler, pressurised metered-dose inhaler, clinical trials, asthma, COPD | ||
650 | 4 | |a inhaler | |
650 | 4 | |a pressurised metered-dose inhaler | |
650 | 4 | |a clinical trials | |
650 | 4 | |a asthma | |
650 | 4 | |a copd | |
653 | 0 | |a Diseases of the respiratory system | |
700 | 0 | |a Leite M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a van Zyl-Smit RN |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t International Journal of COPD |d Dove Medical Press, 2009 |g (2020), Seite 1217-1224 |w (DE-627)504104357 |w (DE-600)2212419-6 |x 11782005 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2020 |g pages:1217-1224 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.dovepress.com/the-relationship-between-clinical-trial-participation-and-inhaler-tech-peer-reviewed-article-COPD |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2005 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |j 2020 |h 1217-1224 |
author_variant |
p r pr l m lm v z s r vzsr |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:11782005:2020----::hrltosibtenlnclrapriiainnihlrehiuerr |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
callnumber-subject-code |
RC |
publishDate |
2020 |
allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ05194250X (DE-599)DOAJ407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC705-779 Perumal R verfasserin aut The Relationship Between Clinical Trial Participation and Inhaler Technique Errors in Asthma and COPD Patients 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Rubeshan Perumal,1 Marcia Leite,2 Richard Nellis van Zyl-Smit1,2 1Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa; 2UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South AfricaCorrespondence: Rubeshan Perumal Email rubeshanperumalgmail.comBackground: Incorrect inhaler use is associated with poorer health outcomes, reduced quality of life, and higher healthcare utilisation in patients with asthma and COPD.Methods: We performed an observational study of pressurized metered-dose inhaler technique in patients with asthma or COPD. Patients were assessed using a six-point inhaler checklist to identify common critical inhaler technique errors. An inadequate inhaler technique was defined as the presence of one or more critical errors. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the odds of an inadequate inhaler technique.Results: During the 14-month study period, 357 patients were enrolled. At least one critical error was executed by 66.7% of participants, and 24.9% made four or more critical errors. The most common errors were failure to exhale completely prior to pMDI activation and inhalation (49.6%), failure to perform a slow, deep inhalation following device activation (48.7%), and failure to perform a breath-hold at the end of inspiration (47.3%). The risk of a critical error was higher in COPD patients (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.13– 4.47). Prior training reduced error risk specifically when trained by a doctor (aOR 0.08, 95% CI 0.1– 0.57) or a pharmacist (aOR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01– 0.26) compared to those with no training. Previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced error risk and rate: < 3 trials (aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19– 0.66) and ≥ 3 trials (aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07– 0.42). The rate of critical errors was not significantly associated with age, sex, or prior pMDI experience.Conclusion: This study found a high rate of critical inhaler technique errors in a mixed population of asthma and COPD patients; however, prior training and, in particular, multiple previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced the risk of errors.Keywords: inhaler, pressurised metered-dose inhaler, clinical trials, asthma, COPD inhaler pressurised metered-dose inhaler clinical trials asthma copd Diseases of the respiratory system Leite M verfasserin aut van Zyl-Smit RN verfasserin aut In International Journal of COPD Dove Medical Press, 2009 (2020), Seite 1217-1224 (DE-627)504104357 (DE-600)2212419-6 11782005 nnns year:2020 pages:1217-1224 https://doaj.org/article/407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0 kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/the-relationship-between-clinical-trial-participation-and-inhaler-tech-peer-reviewed-article-COPD kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2005 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2020 1217-1224 |
spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ05194250X (DE-599)DOAJ407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC705-779 Perumal R verfasserin aut The Relationship Between Clinical Trial Participation and Inhaler Technique Errors in Asthma and COPD Patients 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Rubeshan Perumal,1 Marcia Leite,2 Richard Nellis van Zyl-Smit1,2 1Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa; 2UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South AfricaCorrespondence: Rubeshan Perumal Email rubeshanperumalgmail.comBackground: Incorrect inhaler use is associated with poorer health outcomes, reduced quality of life, and higher healthcare utilisation in patients with asthma and COPD.Methods: We performed an observational study of pressurized metered-dose inhaler technique in patients with asthma or COPD. Patients were assessed using a six-point inhaler checklist to identify common critical inhaler technique errors. An inadequate inhaler technique was defined as the presence of one or more critical errors. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the odds of an inadequate inhaler technique.Results: During the 14-month study period, 357 patients were enrolled. At least one critical error was executed by 66.7% of participants, and 24.9% made four or more critical errors. The most common errors were failure to exhale completely prior to pMDI activation and inhalation (49.6%), failure to perform a slow, deep inhalation following device activation (48.7%), and failure to perform a breath-hold at the end of inspiration (47.3%). The risk of a critical error was higher in COPD patients (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.13– 4.47). Prior training reduced error risk specifically when trained by a doctor (aOR 0.08, 95% CI 0.1– 0.57) or a pharmacist (aOR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01– 0.26) compared to those with no training. Previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced error risk and rate: < 3 trials (aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19– 0.66) and ≥ 3 trials (aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07– 0.42). The rate of critical errors was not significantly associated with age, sex, or prior pMDI experience.Conclusion: This study found a high rate of critical inhaler technique errors in a mixed population of asthma and COPD patients; however, prior training and, in particular, multiple previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced the risk of errors.Keywords: inhaler, pressurised metered-dose inhaler, clinical trials, asthma, COPD inhaler pressurised metered-dose inhaler clinical trials asthma copd Diseases of the respiratory system Leite M verfasserin aut van Zyl-Smit RN verfasserin aut In International Journal of COPD Dove Medical Press, 2009 (2020), Seite 1217-1224 (DE-627)504104357 (DE-600)2212419-6 11782005 nnns year:2020 pages:1217-1224 https://doaj.org/article/407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0 kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/the-relationship-between-clinical-trial-participation-and-inhaler-tech-peer-reviewed-article-COPD kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2005 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2020 1217-1224 |
allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ05194250X (DE-599)DOAJ407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC705-779 Perumal R verfasserin aut The Relationship Between Clinical Trial Participation and Inhaler Technique Errors in Asthma and COPD Patients 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Rubeshan Perumal,1 Marcia Leite,2 Richard Nellis van Zyl-Smit1,2 1Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa; 2UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South AfricaCorrespondence: Rubeshan Perumal Email rubeshanperumalgmail.comBackground: Incorrect inhaler use is associated with poorer health outcomes, reduced quality of life, and higher healthcare utilisation in patients with asthma and COPD.Methods: We performed an observational study of pressurized metered-dose inhaler technique in patients with asthma or COPD. Patients were assessed using a six-point inhaler checklist to identify common critical inhaler technique errors. An inadequate inhaler technique was defined as the presence of one or more critical errors. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the odds of an inadequate inhaler technique.Results: During the 14-month study period, 357 patients were enrolled. At least one critical error was executed by 66.7% of participants, and 24.9% made four or more critical errors. The most common errors were failure to exhale completely prior to pMDI activation and inhalation (49.6%), failure to perform a slow, deep inhalation following device activation (48.7%), and failure to perform a breath-hold at the end of inspiration (47.3%). The risk of a critical error was higher in COPD patients (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.13– 4.47). Prior training reduced error risk specifically when trained by a doctor (aOR 0.08, 95% CI 0.1– 0.57) or a pharmacist (aOR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01– 0.26) compared to those with no training. Previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced error risk and rate: < 3 trials (aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19– 0.66) and ≥ 3 trials (aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07– 0.42). The rate of critical errors was not significantly associated with age, sex, or prior pMDI experience.Conclusion: This study found a high rate of critical inhaler technique errors in a mixed population of asthma and COPD patients; however, prior training and, in particular, multiple previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced the risk of errors.Keywords: inhaler, pressurised metered-dose inhaler, clinical trials, asthma, COPD inhaler pressurised metered-dose inhaler clinical trials asthma copd Diseases of the respiratory system Leite M verfasserin aut van Zyl-Smit RN verfasserin aut In International Journal of COPD Dove Medical Press, 2009 (2020), Seite 1217-1224 (DE-627)504104357 (DE-600)2212419-6 11782005 nnns year:2020 pages:1217-1224 https://doaj.org/article/407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0 kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/the-relationship-between-clinical-trial-participation-and-inhaler-tech-peer-reviewed-article-COPD kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2005 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2020 1217-1224 |
allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ05194250X (DE-599)DOAJ407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC705-779 Perumal R verfasserin aut The Relationship Between Clinical Trial Participation and Inhaler Technique Errors in Asthma and COPD Patients 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Rubeshan Perumal,1 Marcia Leite,2 Richard Nellis van Zyl-Smit1,2 1Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa; 2UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South AfricaCorrespondence: Rubeshan Perumal Email rubeshanperumalgmail.comBackground: Incorrect inhaler use is associated with poorer health outcomes, reduced quality of life, and higher healthcare utilisation in patients with asthma and COPD.Methods: We performed an observational study of pressurized metered-dose inhaler technique in patients with asthma or COPD. Patients were assessed using a six-point inhaler checklist to identify common critical inhaler technique errors. An inadequate inhaler technique was defined as the presence of one or more critical errors. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the odds of an inadequate inhaler technique.Results: During the 14-month study period, 357 patients were enrolled. At least one critical error was executed by 66.7% of participants, and 24.9% made four or more critical errors. The most common errors were failure to exhale completely prior to pMDI activation and inhalation (49.6%), failure to perform a slow, deep inhalation following device activation (48.7%), and failure to perform a breath-hold at the end of inspiration (47.3%). The risk of a critical error was higher in COPD patients (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.13– 4.47). Prior training reduced error risk specifically when trained by a doctor (aOR 0.08, 95% CI 0.1– 0.57) or a pharmacist (aOR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01– 0.26) compared to those with no training. Previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced error risk and rate: < 3 trials (aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19– 0.66) and ≥ 3 trials (aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07– 0.42). The rate of critical errors was not significantly associated with age, sex, or prior pMDI experience.Conclusion: This study found a high rate of critical inhaler technique errors in a mixed population of asthma and COPD patients; however, prior training and, in particular, multiple previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced the risk of errors.Keywords: inhaler, pressurised metered-dose inhaler, clinical trials, asthma, COPD inhaler pressurised metered-dose inhaler clinical trials asthma copd Diseases of the respiratory system Leite M verfasserin aut van Zyl-Smit RN verfasserin aut In International Journal of COPD Dove Medical Press, 2009 (2020), Seite 1217-1224 (DE-627)504104357 (DE-600)2212419-6 11782005 nnns year:2020 pages:1217-1224 https://doaj.org/article/407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0 kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/the-relationship-between-clinical-trial-participation-and-inhaler-tech-peer-reviewed-article-COPD kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2005 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2020 1217-1224 |
allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ05194250X (DE-599)DOAJ407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC705-779 Perumal R verfasserin aut The Relationship Between Clinical Trial Participation and Inhaler Technique Errors in Asthma and COPD Patients 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Rubeshan Perumal,1 Marcia Leite,2 Richard Nellis van Zyl-Smit1,2 1Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa; 2UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South AfricaCorrespondence: Rubeshan Perumal Email rubeshanperumalgmail.comBackground: Incorrect inhaler use is associated with poorer health outcomes, reduced quality of life, and higher healthcare utilisation in patients with asthma and COPD.Methods: We performed an observational study of pressurized metered-dose inhaler technique in patients with asthma or COPD. Patients were assessed using a six-point inhaler checklist to identify common critical inhaler technique errors. An inadequate inhaler technique was defined as the presence of one or more critical errors. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the odds of an inadequate inhaler technique.Results: During the 14-month study period, 357 patients were enrolled. At least one critical error was executed by 66.7% of participants, and 24.9% made four or more critical errors. The most common errors were failure to exhale completely prior to pMDI activation and inhalation (49.6%), failure to perform a slow, deep inhalation following device activation (48.7%), and failure to perform a breath-hold at the end of inspiration (47.3%). The risk of a critical error was higher in COPD patients (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.13– 4.47). Prior training reduced error risk specifically when trained by a doctor (aOR 0.08, 95% CI 0.1– 0.57) or a pharmacist (aOR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01– 0.26) compared to those with no training. Previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced error risk and rate: < 3 trials (aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19– 0.66) and ≥ 3 trials (aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07– 0.42). The rate of critical errors was not significantly associated with age, sex, or prior pMDI experience.Conclusion: This study found a high rate of critical inhaler technique errors in a mixed population of asthma and COPD patients; however, prior training and, in particular, multiple previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced the risk of errors.Keywords: inhaler, pressurised metered-dose inhaler, clinical trials, asthma, COPD inhaler pressurised metered-dose inhaler clinical trials asthma copd Diseases of the respiratory system Leite M verfasserin aut van Zyl-Smit RN verfasserin aut In International Journal of COPD Dove Medical Press, 2009 (2020), Seite 1217-1224 (DE-627)504104357 (DE-600)2212419-6 11782005 nnns year:2020 pages:1217-1224 https://doaj.org/article/407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0 kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/the-relationship-between-clinical-trial-participation-and-inhaler-tech-peer-reviewed-article-COPD kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2005 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2020 1217-1224 |
language |
English |
source |
In International Journal of COPD (2020), Seite 1217-1224 year:2020 pages:1217-1224 |
sourceStr |
In International Journal of COPD (2020), Seite 1217-1224 year:2020 pages:1217-1224 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
inhaler pressurised metered-dose inhaler clinical trials asthma copd Diseases of the respiratory system |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
International Journal of COPD |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Perumal R @@aut@@ Leite M @@aut@@ van Zyl-Smit RN @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
504104357 |
id |
DOAJ05194250X |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ05194250X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308163454.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ05194250X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC705-779</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perumal R</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Relationship Between Clinical Trial Participation and Inhaler Technique Errors in Asthma and COPD Patients</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rubeshan Perumal,1 Marcia Leite,2 Richard Nellis van Zyl-Smit1,2 1Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa; 2UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South AfricaCorrespondence: Rubeshan Perumal Email rubeshanperumalgmail.comBackground: Incorrect inhaler use is associated with poorer health outcomes, reduced quality of life, and higher healthcare utilisation in patients with asthma and COPD.Methods: We performed an observational study of pressurized metered-dose inhaler technique in patients with asthma or COPD. Patients were assessed using a six-point inhaler checklist to identify common critical inhaler technique errors. An inadequate inhaler technique was defined as the presence of one or more critical errors. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the odds of an inadequate inhaler technique.Results: During the 14-month study period, 357 patients were enrolled. At least one critical error was executed by 66.7% of participants, and 24.9% made four or more critical errors. The most common errors were failure to exhale completely prior to pMDI activation and inhalation (49.6%), failure to perform a slow, deep inhalation following device activation (48.7%), and failure to perform a breath-hold at the end of inspiration (47.3%). The risk of a critical error was higher in COPD patients (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.13&ndash; 4.47). Prior training reduced error risk specifically when trained by a doctor (aOR 0.08, 95% CI 0.1&ndash; 0.57) or a pharmacist (aOR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01&ndash; 0.26) compared to those with no training. Previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced error risk and rate: &lt; 3 trials (aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19&ndash; 0.66) and &ge; 3 trials (aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07&ndash; 0.42). The rate of critical errors was not significantly associated with age, sex, or prior pMDI experience.Conclusion: This study found a high rate of critical inhaler technique errors in a mixed population of asthma and COPD patients; however, prior training and, in particular, multiple previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced the risk of errors.Keywords: inhaler, pressurised metered-dose inhaler, clinical trials, asthma, COPD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">inhaler</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pressurised metered-dose inhaler</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">clinical trials</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">asthma</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">copd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Diseases of the respiratory system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Leite M</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van Zyl-Smit RN</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International Journal of COPD</subfield><subfield code="d">Dove Medical Press, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">(2020), Seite 1217-1224</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)504104357</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2212419-6</subfield><subfield code="x">11782005</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1217-1224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.dovepress.com/the-relationship-between-clinical-trial-participation-and-inhaler-tech-peer-reviewed-article-COPD</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2005</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="h">1217-1224</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
author |
Perumal R |
spellingShingle |
Perumal R misc RC705-779 misc inhaler misc pressurised metered-dose inhaler misc clinical trials misc asthma misc copd misc Diseases of the respiratory system The Relationship Between Clinical Trial Participation and Inhaler Technique Errors in Asthma and COPD Patients |
authorStr |
Perumal R |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)504104357 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
RC705-779 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
11782005 |
topic_title |
RC705-779 The Relationship Between Clinical Trial Participation and Inhaler Technique Errors in Asthma and COPD Patients inhaler pressurised metered-dose inhaler clinical trials asthma copd |
topic |
misc RC705-779 misc inhaler misc pressurised metered-dose inhaler misc clinical trials misc asthma misc copd misc Diseases of the respiratory system |
topic_unstemmed |
misc RC705-779 misc inhaler misc pressurised metered-dose inhaler misc clinical trials misc asthma misc copd misc Diseases of the respiratory system |
topic_browse |
misc RC705-779 misc inhaler misc pressurised metered-dose inhaler misc clinical trials misc asthma misc copd misc Diseases of the respiratory system |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
International Journal of COPD |
hierarchy_parent_id |
504104357 |
hierarchy_top_title |
International Journal of COPD |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)504104357 (DE-600)2212419-6 |
title |
The Relationship Between Clinical Trial Participation and Inhaler Technique Errors in Asthma and COPD Patients |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ05194250X (DE-599)DOAJ407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0 |
title_full |
The Relationship Between Clinical Trial Participation and Inhaler Technique Errors in Asthma and COPD Patients |
author_sort |
Perumal R |
journal |
International Journal of COPD |
journalStr |
International Journal of COPD |
callnumber-first-code |
R |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2020 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
1217 |
author_browse |
Perumal R Leite M van Zyl-Smit RN |
class |
RC705-779 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Perumal R |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
relationship between clinical trial participation and inhaler technique errors in asthma and copd patients |
callnumber |
RC705-779 |
title_auth |
The Relationship Between Clinical Trial Participation and Inhaler Technique Errors in Asthma and COPD Patients |
abstract |
Rubeshan Perumal,1 Marcia Leite,2 Richard Nellis van Zyl-Smit1,2 1Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa; 2UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South AfricaCorrespondence: Rubeshan Perumal Email rubeshanperumalgmail.comBackground: Incorrect inhaler use is associated with poorer health outcomes, reduced quality of life, and higher healthcare utilisation in patients with asthma and COPD.Methods: We performed an observational study of pressurized metered-dose inhaler technique in patients with asthma or COPD. Patients were assessed using a six-point inhaler checklist to identify common critical inhaler technique errors. An inadequate inhaler technique was defined as the presence of one or more critical errors. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the odds of an inadequate inhaler technique.Results: During the 14-month study period, 357 patients were enrolled. At least one critical error was executed by 66.7% of participants, and 24.9% made four or more critical errors. The most common errors were failure to exhale completely prior to pMDI activation and inhalation (49.6%), failure to perform a slow, deep inhalation following device activation (48.7%), and failure to perform a breath-hold at the end of inspiration (47.3%). The risk of a critical error was higher in COPD patients (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.13– 4.47). Prior training reduced error risk specifically when trained by a doctor (aOR 0.08, 95% CI 0.1– 0.57) or a pharmacist (aOR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01– 0.26) compared to those with no training. Previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced error risk and rate: < 3 trials (aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19– 0.66) and ≥ 3 trials (aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07– 0.42). The rate of critical errors was not significantly associated with age, sex, or prior pMDI experience.Conclusion: This study found a high rate of critical inhaler technique errors in a mixed population of asthma and COPD patients; however, prior training and, in particular, multiple previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced the risk of errors.Keywords: inhaler, pressurised metered-dose inhaler, clinical trials, asthma, COPD |
abstractGer |
Rubeshan Perumal,1 Marcia Leite,2 Richard Nellis van Zyl-Smit1,2 1Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa; 2UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South AfricaCorrespondence: Rubeshan Perumal Email rubeshanperumalgmail.comBackground: Incorrect inhaler use is associated with poorer health outcomes, reduced quality of life, and higher healthcare utilisation in patients with asthma and COPD.Methods: We performed an observational study of pressurized metered-dose inhaler technique in patients with asthma or COPD. Patients were assessed using a six-point inhaler checklist to identify common critical inhaler technique errors. An inadequate inhaler technique was defined as the presence of one or more critical errors. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the odds of an inadequate inhaler technique.Results: During the 14-month study period, 357 patients were enrolled. At least one critical error was executed by 66.7% of participants, and 24.9% made four or more critical errors. The most common errors were failure to exhale completely prior to pMDI activation and inhalation (49.6%), failure to perform a slow, deep inhalation following device activation (48.7%), and failure to perform a breath-hold at the end of inspiration (47.3%). The risk of a critical error was higher in COPD patients (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.13– 4.47). Prior training reduced error risk specifically when trained by a doctor (aOR 0.08, 95% CI 0.1– 0.57) or a pharmacist (aOR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01– 0.26) compared to those with no training. Previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced error risk and rate: < 3 trials (aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19– 0.66) and ≥ 3 trials (aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07– 0.42). The rate of critical errors was not significantly associated with age, sex, or prior pMDI experience.Conclusion: This study found a high rate of critical inhaler technique errors in a mixed population of asthma and COPD patients; however, prior training and, in particular, multiple previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced the risk of errors.Keywords: inhaler, pressurised metered-dose inhaler, clinical trials, asthma, COPD |
abstract_unstemmed |
Rubeshan Perumal,1 Marcia Leite,2 Richard Nellis van Zyl-Smit1,2 1Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa; 2UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South AfricaCorrespondence: Rubeshan Perumal Email rubeshanperumalgmail.comBackground: Incorrect inhaler use is associated with poorer health outcomes, reduced quality of life, and higher healthcare utilisation in patients with asthma and COPD.Methods: We performed an observational study of pressurized metered-dose inhaler technique in patients with asthma or COPD. Patients were assessed using a six-point inhaler checklist to identify common critical inhaler technique errors. An inadequate inhaler technique was defined as the presence of one or more critical errors. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the odds of an inadequate inhaler technique.Results: During the 14-month study period, 357 patients were enrolled. At least one critical error was executed by 66.7% of participants, and 24.9% made four or more critical errors. The most common errors were failure to exhale completely prior to pMDI activation and inhalation (49.6%), failure to perform a slow, deep inhalation following device activation (48.7%), and failure to perform a breath-hold at the end of inspiration (47.3%). The risk of a critical error was higher in COPD patients (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.13– 4.47). Prior training reduced error risk specifically when trained by a doctor (aOR 0.08, 95% CI 0.1– 0.57) or a pharmacist (aOR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01– 0.26) compared to those with no training. Previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced error risk and rate: < 3 trials (aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19– 0.66) and ≥ 3 trials (aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07– 0.42). The rate of critical errors was not significantly associated with age, sex, or prior pMDI experience.Conclusion: This study found a high rate of critical inhaler technique errors in a mixed population of asthma and COPD patients; however, prior training and, in particular, multiple previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced the risk of errors.Keywords: inhaler, pressurised metered-dose inhaler, clinical trials, asthma, COPD |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
title_short |
The Relationship Between Clinical Trial Participation and Inhaler Technique Errors in Asthma and COPD Patients |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0 https://www.dovepress.com/the-relationship-between-clinical-trial-participation-and-inhaler-tech-peer-reviewed-article-COPD https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2005 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Leite M van Zyl-Smit RN |
author2Str |
Leite M van Zyl-Smit RN |
ppnlink |
504104357 |
callnumber-subject |
RC - Internal Medicine |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
callnumber-a |
RC705-779 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T23:00:57.233Z |
_version_ |
1803600692232847360 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ05194250X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308163454.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ05194250X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC705-779</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perumal R</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Relationship Between Clinical Trial Participation and Inhaler Technique Errors in Asthma and COPD Patients</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rubeshan Perumal,1 Marcia Leite,2 Richard Nellis van Zyl-Smit1,2 1Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa; 2UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South AfricaCorrespondence: Rubeshan Perumal Email rubeshanperumalgmail.comBackground: Incorrect inhaler use is associated with poorer health outcomes, reduced quality of life, and higher healthcare utilisation in patients with asthma and COPD.Methods: We performed an observational study of pressurized metered-dose inhaler technique in patients with asthma or COPD. Patients were assessed using a six-point inhaler checklist to identify common critical inhaler technique errors. An inadequate inhaler technique was defined as the presence of one or more critical errors. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the odds of an inadequate inhaler technique.Results: During the 14-month study period, 357 patients were enrolled. At least one critical error was executed by 66.7% of participants, and 24.9% made four or more critical errors. The most common errors were failure to exhale completely prior to pMDI activation and inhalation (49.6%), failure to perform a slow, deep inhalation following device activation (48.7%), and failure to perform a breath-hold at the end of inspiration (47.3%). The risk of a critical error was higher in COPD patients (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.13&ndash; 4.47). Prior training reduced error risk specifically when trained by a doctor (aOR 0.08, 95% CI 0.1&ndash; 0.57) or a pharmacist (aOR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01&ndash; 0.26) compared to those with no training. Previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced error risk and rate: &lt; 3 trials (aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19&ndash; 0.66) and &ge; 3 trials (aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07&ndash; 0.42). The rate of critical errors was not significantly associated with age, sex, or prior pMDI experience.Conclusion: This study found a high rate of critical inhaler technique errors in a mixed population of asthma and COPD patients; however, prior training and, in particular, multiple previous clinical trial participation significantly reduced the risk of errors.Keywords: inhaler, pressurised metered-dose inhaler, clinical trials, asthma, COPD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">inhaler</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pressurised metered-dose inhaler</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">clinical trials</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">asthma</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">copd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Diseases of the respiratory system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Leite M</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van Zyl-Smit RN</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International Journal of COPD</subfield><subfield code="d">Dove Medical Press, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">(2020), Seite 1217-1224</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)504104357</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2212419-6</subfield><subfield code="x">11782005</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1217-1224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/407687a0b8a54d2fbad6e741efabc8a0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.dovepress.com/the-relationship-between-clinical-trial-participation-and-inhaler-tech-peer-reviewed-article-COPD</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2005</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="h">1217-1224</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3995275 |